A Review of the Customer Lifetime Value As a Customer Profitabilitu Measure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Review of the Customer Lifetime Value As a Customer Profitabilitu Measure IC, 2011 – 7(2): 261-279 - Online ISSN: 1697-9818 - Print ISSN: 2014-3214 http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.2011.v7n2.p261-279 A review of the customer lifetime value as a customer profitability measure in the context of customer relationship management Raphael Damm, Carlos Rodríguez Monroy Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (Spain) [email protected], [email protected] Received December, 2010 Accepted June, 2011 Abstract Purpose: A number of customer metrics allow estimating customer profitability with methods such as the Customer Lifetime Value (CLV). However, investments in customer relationships carry the potential risk to destroy value and reduce profitability when based on incorrect estimates of customer profitability. Therefore, estimating future customer value correctly is essential to allocate marketing expenditures in the most effective way. In this article recent literature about the CLV is reviewed in order to assess its ability as a customer profitability measure. Besides the financial perspective of the CLV, non-financial perspectives such as customer advocacy, (customer or open) innovation and learning have been identified to have an impact on customer profitability. How to properly estimate a customer’s value taking all relevant value creating factors, financial as well as non-financial, into account is the underlying research question. Design/methodology/approach: This research is based on the review of a number of theoretical and empirical articles published between 1990 and 2010. The aggregation of measures, key-drivers and risks of each key- perspective of the customer relationship contributes to the development of a more systematic understanding of the value creation process and provides answers to the research question. Indirect effects of the CLV as a source of - 261 - Intangible Capital - http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.2011.v7n2.p261-279 value have received increasing attention in previous research but are not sufficiently accounted for by mainstream methods for valuing customers (Ryals, 2008). Therefore, the attempt to structure available knowledge on indirect effects of the CLV in its contextual setting is made. Findings: This research is concluded providing evidence that one- dimensional calculations of the CLV deliver an incomplete picture of the customer relationship and estimate customer profitability incorrectly. This supports the idea of a multidimensional CLV approach that accounts for interrelated key-perspectives and results in superior resource allocation. Originality/value: Seeing customers in a comprehensive way helps to better understand their needs and potential contributions, so that long-term overall profitability can be advanced through the consideration of indirect effects. Indirect effects are usually not reflected in common accounting methods but might result in benefits for the firm. In this research, evidence is provided for the importance of indirect effects offered by customers. This makes the consideration of all relevant dimensions in the value creation process fundamental in order to allocate marketing resources in the most effective way. Keywords: customer lifetime value, customer profitability, non-financial values, customer relationship management Jel Codes: M31 1. Introduction The ever-present need to justify investments in marketing activities, calls for marketing measures that can be linked to future customer value and firm performance (Peterson et al., 2009). The CLV approach captures customer metrics in order to quantify the potential monetary value of customers over their lifetime. This allows better estimating customers’ financial values, focusing on profitability, grouping customers and analyzing the returns on investments made into customers. The purpose of the CLV is to increases marketing’s accountability within the firm, help managers and retailers to identify the drivers of future customer and firm value and build linkages between marketing strategy and financial outcomes - 262 - Intangible Capital - http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.2011.v7n2.p261-279 (Peterson et al., 2009). However, applying the CLV also leads to a number of questions. 1. Does the valuation take all relevant value creating factors into account so that the CLV is properly estimated? 2. Does the CLV properly account for risks inherent in customer relationships such as customer defection or negative customer advocacy? 3. Do forecasting difficulties limit the practical use and acceptance of the CLV? The CLV takes direct customer spending into account but does not incorporate indirect revenues from additional sales through Word of Mouth (WOM) or the likes. In addition, neither savings that result from customer triggered process optimizations are subject of the CLV, nor are reductions of uncertainties resulting from reliable customer relationships reflected by the CLV. That raises the question if customer profitability will be estimated correctly when neither customer advocacy, the innovation potential nor the learning potential are accounted for. Moreover, will marketing expenses be utilized in the most adequate, that is, profitable way if long-term overall customer profitability is estimated incorrectly not accounting for important value creating potentials? Relationships might be seen as emotional selling propositions due to the fact that satisfied customers return to trusted companies (Urban, 2005). The Customer Relationship Management (CRM) aims at establishing long-term relationships with customers in order to gain insights into what matters most to customers. Insights into specific customer needs enable companies to better target and satisfy them and provide knowledge for potential product developments. Measuring and comparing the costs to acquire and to maintain customers are prerequisites in order to be able to decide focusing on customer retention or on customer acquisition. Although it is commonly accepted that it is important to measure what is to be managed there are important aspects that are unobservable but nevertheless need to be managed. As the CLV is estimated over a number of transactions, that are likely to occur throughout the customer lifetime, it cannot be seen in an isolated way but rather in the long–term relationship context that CRM suggests. The CLV can therefore be seen as a tool that allows the calculation of potential customer value only if a (long- term) relationship exists. The contextual settings, such as long-term relationship, customer satisfaction, customer learning and others that are suggested by the CRM approach are crucial, as CLV estimates will only be calculated correctly if contextual - 263 - Intangible Capital - http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.2011.v7n2.p261-279 settings support the compliance of customer metrics. Expected lifetime, retention rate and others are CLV determining elements that are strongly influenced by the contextual settings. Hence, an overview of the CRM approach is necessary to understand the contextual settings that are required for the calculation of the CLV. 2. A brief review of the customer relationship management concept The CRM approach reflects the shift from functional traditional marketing, focused on products and customer acquisition, towards comprehensive marketing that puts the relationship with the customer first. The essence of CRM is to change organizations from a products-centric to customer-centric philosophy (Kim et al., 2003). Developments in technology have enabled companies to see customer relationships more holistically provoking this change from transactional to relationship marketing (Alt et al., 2005). Although technologies play a crucial role in CRM enabling the aggregation of customer data and the recognition of patterns, they are not subject of this research and will not be discussed here. The central idea behind engaging customers in long-term relationships is to increase company and customer value by systematical management of existing customers. Kim et al. (2003) summarize the following potential benefits of CRM: • Increased customer retention and loyalty • Higher customer profitability • Creation value for the customer • Customization of products and services • Lower process, higher quality products and services The tangible effects of companies’ commitment to retaining customers were first published by Dawkins and Reichheld (1990) who claim that higher retention rate leads to higher net present value of customers (Ahmad & Buttle, 2002). The selection and acquisition of customers based on the purely financial CLV become critical to the long-term customer profitability. The CLV as the measure for customer profitability possesses a fundamental role as it serves within the customer analysis as a deciding feature. The correctness of the CLV in terms of long-term overall customer profitability consequently turns out to be essential for the most efficient employment of marketing expenditures. - 264 - Intangible Capital - http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.2011.v7n2.p261-279 The review of literature on the CRM approach has revealed the existence of varying definitions (Reinartz et al., 2004; Payne & Frow, 2005; Richards & Jones, 2008) and an imperfect conceptualization of the CRM concept (Magro & Goy, 2008). The aim of a conceptualization is to provide a general definition and categories, so that areas can be classified and grouped accordingly. A formalized ontology building process is suggested by Pinto and Martins (2004). They state specification, conceptualization, formalization, implementation and maintenance
Recommended publications
  • ROI for Marketing: Balancing Accountability with Long-Term Needs
    ROI for Marketing: Balancing Accountability with Long-Term Needs By Robert S. Duboff ROI for Marketing: Balancing Accountability with Long-Term Needs By Robert S. Duboff ISBN 1-56318-075-8 © Copyright 2007 by the Association of National Advertisers, Inc. All rights in this book are reserved. No part of the book may be used or reproduced in any manner without written permission, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information, please contact: Association of National Advertisers, Inc. 708 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017-4270 (212) 697-5950 www.ana.net Printed in the United States iii Table of Contents About the ANA ANA Mission Statement . .v About the Author Robert S. Duboff . .vii Foreword . .ix Chapter One Return on Investment: The ROI Conundrum . .1 Chapter Two The Nature of Marketing . .9 Chapter Three Measurement . .21 Chapter Four Decisions . .39 Chapter Five Doing Some Math . .51 Chapter Six The Path Forward . .69 Footnotes . .77 ROI for Marketing: Balancing Accountability with Long-Term Needs iv ROI for Marketing: Balancing Accountability with Long-Term Needs v About the ANA The Association of National Advertisers leads the marketing community by providing its members insights, collaboration and advocacy. ANA’s membership includes 370 companies with 8,000 brands that collectively spend over $100 billion in marketing communications and advertising. The ANA strives to communicate marketing best practices, lead industry initiatives, influence industry prac- tices, manage industry affairs and advance, promote and protect all advertisers and marketers. For more information visit: www.ana.net. ANA Mission Statement ANA provides indispensable leadership that drives marketing excellence and champions, promotes and defends the interests of the marketing community.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Definitive, Up-To-Date Guide to Marketing Metrics
    Your Definitive, Up-to-Date Guide to Marketing Metrics This award-winning guide will helps accurately quantify the performance of all marketing investments, increase marketing ROI, and grow profits. Learn how to apply today’s best practices for assessing everything from brand equity to social media, email performance, and rich media interaction. Four experts explain how to measure costly sponsorships, explore links between marketing and financial metrics for current and aspiring C-suite decision-makers; present better ways to measure omnichannel marketing activities; and discuss accountability and standardization in marketing measurement. As in their best-selling previous editions, the authors present pros, cons, and practical guidance for every technique they cover. • Measure promotions, advertising, distribution, customer perceptions, competitor power, margins, pricing, product portfolios, salesforces, and more SAVE 35% • Apply web, online, social, and mobile metrics more effectively informit.com/marketing-metrics • Build models to optimize planning and decision- Enter the code METRICS during making checkout • Attribute purchase decisions when multiple channels FREE US SHIPPING on print books interact • Understand the links between search and distribution, Major eBook Formats and use new online distribution metrics Only InformIT offers PDF, EPUB, & • Evaluate marketings impact on a publicly traded firms MOBI together for one price financial objectives New to This Edition OTHER AVAILABILITY • Evaluating the value of sponsorships — a
    [Show full text]
  • Three Strikes and You're
    White Paper Three Strikes and You’re Out Three Strikes and You’re Out Why Marketing Automation Failed the First time, and Why This Time is Different Matt Williams, a Golden-Glove winning second baseman, was a promising batter but couldn‟t hit a curveball. He had potential but the wrong strategy. What did he do? He revamped his swing–and dramatically improved his batting average, not to mention his salary. Chipper Jones was the star third baseman for the Atlanta Braves, but he knew the importance of versatility. So to expand what he could offer the team he switched to the outfield–and may have saved his job. He‟s still playing for the Braves today, and he‟s back at third base by the way. What do these players have in common? They recognized the changing nature of their industry and did something significant to maintain their value, with significant success as result. Just as baseball has evolved, requiring new strategies and techniques to stay competitive, marketing is also undergoing a dramatic upheaval, driven by the Internet and the rise of marketing accountability. In turn, this will lead to new players and strategies for success in marketing automation. Marketing upheaval The Internet has forever changed the way we interact with and market to customers. Web sites, email campaigns, Webinars and pay-per-click campaign management are just a few examples of this, not to mention blogs, podcasts, and user-generated content. You won‟t find any of these tactics referenced in classic marketing textbooks from just a handful of years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Success Factors for Building a Best-Run Marketing Organization
    SAP White Paper SAP Customer Relationship Management SIX SUCCESS FACTORS FOR BUILDING A BEST-RUN MARKETING ORGANIZATION Version 01 © Copyright 2007 SAP AG. All rights reserved. HTML, XML, XHTML and W3C are trademarks or registered trademarks of W3C®, World Wide Web Consortium, No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in Massachusetts Institute of Technology. any form or for any purpose without the express permission of SAP AG. The information contained herein may be changed Java is a registered trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc. without prior notice. JavaScript is a registered trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc., Some software products marketed by SAP AG and its distributors used under license for technology invented and implemented contain proprietary software components of other software by Netscape. vendors. MaxDB is a trademark of MySQL AB, Sweden. Microsoft, Windows, Excel, Outlook, and PowerPoint are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. SAP, R/3, mySAP, mySAP.com, xApps, xApp, SAP NetWeaver, Duet, PartnerEdge, and other SAP products and services IBM, DB2, DB2 Universal Database, OS/2, Parallel Sysplex, mentioned herein as well as their respective logos are trademarks MVS/ESA, AIX, S/390, AS/400, OS/390, OS/400, iSeries, pSeries, or registered trademarks of SAP AG in Germany and in several xSeries, zSeries, System i, System i5, System p, System p5, System x, other countries all over the world. All other product and System z, System z9, z/OS, AFP, Intelligent Miner, WebSphere, service names mentioned are the trademarks of their respective Netfinity, Tivoli, Informix, i5/OS, POWER, POWER5, POWER5+, companies. Data contained in this document serves informational OpenPower and PowerPC are trademarks or registered purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing Accountability Study White Paper
    Marketing Accountability Study White Paper Presented by © 2005 INTRODUCTION It’s one thing to ask marketers to justify expenses on their well-researched, thoroughly contemplated marketing programs, especially when it comes to a company’s bottom-line objectives in a given fiscal period. It’s quite another thing to impose accountability and responsibility for such expenditures onto those marketers in an effort to ensure that such efforts will have a direct connection with the overall business plan in the near- and long-terms. This 2005 study, co-sponsored by the American Marketing Association and Aprimo, Inc. is geared to provide evi- dence that the concepts behind marketing accountability are penetrating the silos of today’s C-level executives at Fortune 1000 and Global 2000 companies in the United States — specifically CMOs and others ultimately respon- sible for developing and implementing marketing programs. In an era of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and other federally mandated initiatives that hold corporate executives responsible for their business practices, marketing ac- countability is expected to play a key role in the formation of future marketing procedures. The AMA defines marketing accountability as: “The responsibility for the systematic management of marketing resources and processes to achieve measurable gains in return on mar- keting investment and increased marketing efficiency, while maintaining quality and increasing the value of the corporation.” The goal of the study was to establish the importance of marketing accountability and other marketing-related is- sues; determine which initiatives related to marketing accountability are already in place (including the software and tools currently in use); identify the benefits and the obstacles to implementing marketing accountability objectives; and establish the degree to which companies are in compliance with accountability legislation imposed by regulatory bodies, such as the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing Accountability and Marketing
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/1450-2194.htm Marketing Marketing accountability and accountability marketing automation: and evidence from Portugal automation Susana C. Silva Catolica Porto Business School and CEGE, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal Received 3 November 2020 Revised 17 March 2021 Leonardo Corbo 13 April 2021 University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy and Accepted 20 April 2021 CEGE, Catolica Porto Business School, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal, and Bozidar Vlacic and Mariana Fernandes Catolica Porto Business School and CEGE, Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal Abstract Purpose – The present study seeks to outline the role of marketing automation (MA) in measuring the return on marketing activities and the challenges associated with reaching accountability in marketing. Design/methodology/approach – To investigate the objective of the study, the authors adopted a qualitative approach, conducting an exploratory study among ten key informants located in Portugal. Findings – Based on the results of the qualitative analysis, a conceptual framework is proposed, which includes both strategic- and operational-level factors with the goal of creating a value-based agenda. In this agenda, executives such as the Chief Marketing Officer emerge as value creators, fostering business scalability, and further arguments are provided to justify budget allocation to MA activities. Originality/value – Through careful research of the elements that characterize the phenomenon under study, the present paper ultimately contributes to a better understanding of MA and accountability within the current business paradigm. Keywords Accountability, Automation, Marketer, Marketing, Performance measurement Paper type Research paper 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Condensed Guide to Marketing Accountability for Ceos by Oscar Jamhouri and Marek Winiarz
    A Condensed Guide to Marketing Accountability for CEOs By Oscar Jamhouri and Marek Winiarz All material contained in this document remain the copyright of Integration (Marketing & Communications) Limited. No part of this document shall be used or reproduced or transmitted without the express written permission of the copyright holder. Copyright 2013 by Integration. All Rights Reserved. Integration® is owner of all MCA® products, tools and trademarks. September 2013 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................... 5 Section 1 – The Road to System Thinking 1. The Marketing Problem ..................................................................... 8 2. What do the Experts Say? .................................................................. 11 3. The MCA System Provides Marketing Accountability ......................... 12 Section 2 - The Right Data 1. Marketing Data Fundamentals ........................................................... 14 2. What is “Right” Data? ......................................................................... 14 3. Data Relevance ................................................................................... 14 3.1. Interaction Effectiveness.................................................. 15 3.2. Transaction Effectiveness................................................. 16 3.3. Costs of Marketing ........................................................... 17 3.4. Marketing ROI .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining the Relationships Between Marketing's Accountability And
    Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(7): 777-786, 2013 ISSN 1991-8178 Explaining the Relationships Between Marketing's Accountability and Internal Legitimacy with the Firm Performance (The Case Study of the Productive Brand Owner Firms) 1Shiva Yazdanfar, 2Bahman Hajipour and 3Afshin Ghasemi 1Master of Executive Management, Department of Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, khouzestan-Iran. 2Associate professor, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. 3Master of Administration Management, Shahid Chamran University-Ahvaz, Iran. Abstract: Consensus exists in the academic and business expertsregarding the growing challenges in the status of the marketing department within the organization. Practitioners and academics suggest that the department does not get enough acknowledgeelements from the upper echelondue to its lack of accountability and internal legitimacy, despite its pivotal role in influencing the company's strategic direction.Marketing's lack of accountability not only leads to a weakening of the department's influence within the organization, but also threatens the department's legitimacy within the organization. Importance of marketing department and accountability of the firms have always been discussed by the industries and different organization's managers. In some firms, marketing has merely been one of the firm's segments and all of the branches have an identical status in the firm and none of them have the leadership duty. The aim of this study is explaining the relationship between the marketing's accountability and internal legitimacy by the firm performance. The methodology of the current study is a kind of descriptive-correlational one. The data collection instrument is a researcher-made questionnaire including a five-choice-range of Likert which has been distributed among the statistical sample of 315 of the middle managers and the employees of 35 brand owner firms in the clothing, home appliances, audio-visual, and furniture industries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Definitive Guide to Marketing Metrics and Analytics Table of Contents
    The Definitive Guide to Marketing Metrics and Analytics Table of Contents 4 PART 1 Measurement Builds Respect and Accountability 6 PART 2 Planning for Marketing ROI 12 PART 3 A Framework for Measurement 24 PART 4 Revenue Analytics 32 PART 5 Marketing Performance Measurement 45 PART 6 The Art of Forecasting 57 PART 7 Dashboards 62 PART 8 Implementation: Team, Tactics, Technology THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE TO MARKETING METRICS & ANALYTICS 2 INTRODUCTION Why Should I Read the Definitive Guide to Marketing Metrics and Analytics? Marketing metrics and analytics—done right—can be a strategic enabler of trust, greater budget, and increased business impact. Today’s CMO is allocating more time and budget than ever before to understand marketing’s performance and influence on growth. Gartner found that marketing analytics 42.1% of organizations report using area. Gartner found that only one third of earns the greatest share of marketing marketing analytics for decision-making CMOs say ROI of total marketing spend budget at 9.2%, while a recent CMO (the largest percentage in the last is a strategic key performance indicator.3 Survey from Deloitte and Duke five years).2 77% of global B2B marketing decision University’s Fuqua School of Business makers cite their use of data and found that spending on marketing The growing imperative for marketers to analytics to guide marketing decisions analytics is forecasted to increase by prove their worth has arrived—but many as one of their department's top five nearly 200% in the next three years.1 firms have ground to make up in this weaknesses, according to Forrester.4 THIS GUIDE WILL HELP YOU ANSWER KEY QUESTIONS RELATED TO MARKETING METRICS AND ANALYTICS LIKE: What are the most important Which personnel, procedural, How can I best communicate marketing metrics for my team and cultural changes need to marketing results with my to consider? occur within my organization executive team and board? so I can implement marketing How can I measure my various And many more..
    [Show full text]
  • Whitepaper Integrated Marketing Automation
    WHITEPAPER INTEGRATED MARKETING AUTOMATION By: ActiveConversion ENGINEERED FOR INDUSTRY Page 1 Executive Summary Today, almost all your marketing activity directs interested prospects and customers to your website. Whether that activity is generated by traditional or online marketing methods, there haven’t been effective and low cost solutions for companies to measure the effectiveness of their marketing. In addition, there needed a way to convert those visitors into reliable leads for a sales team. Businesses that have longer sales cycles, such as in business to business (B to B), have not been able to take full advantage of their marketing because they are unable to extract enough information from these same leads. Leads are reluctant to fill out forms or call because they are not ready to buy, leaving 98% of visitors undiscovered. Who’s your next buyer? We can tell you in minutes. What’s working to reach them? Also, since direct response on the Internet is faster than the buyer’s ability to move through a sales cycle, businesses are unable to take full advantage of their online demand generation efforts. What was required to overcome this barrier was a system built specifically to follow a sales cycle, over time. ActiveConversion™ is software as a service (SaaS) that provides an organization with the ability to: manage marketing accountability, generate and nurture leads, and track their readiness to buy. It can be up and running in less than an hour. There is no software to install, no hardware to lease, and no IT expertise required. And because it is an integrated web service, it takes advantage of direct integration with tools such as Google, Vertical Response, Salesforce.com and Jigsaw Data.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Amarketing PERSPECTIVE on the IMPACT of FINANCIAL and NON
    216 SAJEMS NS 16 (2013) No 2 A MARKETING PERSPECTIVE ON THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL AND NON-FINANCIAL MEASURES ON SHAREHOLDER VALUE Nic S Terblanche, Charlene Gerber, Pierre Erasmus and Delia Schmidt Department of Business Management, University of Stellenbosch Accepted: August 2012 Abstract The pressure for financial accountability contributed to widespread concern about the function of marketing within the company. Consequently, marketers have become preoccupied with measuring the performance of marketing activity. Diverse financial and non-financial methods have been developed to provide evidence of how marketing activity impacts on the bottom line. This article proposes an approach whereby financial and non-financial performance measures are combined to measure the contribution of marketing to sales. Secondary data from two retail brands within the same industry were analysed whereby actual accounting data were adjusted to examine the link between marketing expenditures, specifically with regard to the 4Ps (typical non-financial measures), and sales. The results of the time series regression showed that the nature of the relationship between marketing expenditures and sales is dependent largely on the product characteristics. The link between marketing and sales depicted serves as a starting point from which to build a more robust measurement tool incorporating financial and non-financial marketing performance measures that will serve to justify investment in the marketing of a brand. Key words: shareholder value, marketing performance measures, time series analysis JEL: M368 1 these seem to be inadequate for measuring Introduction important elements of marketing performance (Lehmann, 2004). Researchers have found that Marketing managers are being required to a combination of financial (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • WHITE PAPER WHITE PAPER Brand Investment and Valuation
    WHITE PAPER Brand Investment and Valuation a new, empirically-based approach Frank Findley MSW•ARS Research presented at ARF Re!think Conference March 2016 MarketingMarketing Accountability Accountability Standards Standards Board Board 1 of theof theMarketing Marketing Accountability Accountability Foundation Foundation themasb.org About The Marketing Accountability Standards Board began as a visionary initiative by industry professionals and academics who saw an opportunity to increase the contribution of the MASB marketing function through the development of standards for marketing performance measurement and processes that link marketing activities to financial performance. After comprehensive review of current practices, needs and accountability initiatives sponsored by industry organizations, it was determined that while marketing was not ignoring the issues surrounding metrics and accountability, the practices and initiatives underway were narrow in focus, lacking integration and generally not tied to financial performance in predictable ways. “As it was for product quality in manufacturing (with ANSI & ISO) and financial accounting and reporting (FASB & IASB), marketers taking the lead in this will gain sustained competitive advantage.” – Dr. Joseph Plummer, MASB Founding Director MASB is THE independent, cross-industry forum that sets the measurement and accountability standards that visionary leaders in Finance and Marketing rely on to guide investment decisions for enterprise value. MASB Establishing MASB in 2007 was viewed as the seminal opportunity to approach the measurement foundation of accountability and continuous improvement at the highest Members level. Membership crosses all industries and includes marketer companies, business schools, industry associations, media providers, media & advertising agencies, measurement providers and independent consultants that believe in linking marketing actions to financial performance.
    [Show full text]