DOCSLIB.ORG

Thesis Final Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thesis Final Draft Harris, Emily (2016) Making a home: the difficulty of dwelling in Genesis and its intertexts. MTh(R) thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/7470/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] ! Making a Home: the difficulty of dwelling in Genesis and its intertexts Emily Harris MA (Joint Hons) English Literature and Theology and Religious Studies Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Theology and Religious Studies, MTh (Research) University of Glasgow Theology and Religious Studies School of Critical Studies, College of Arts September, 2015 (c) Emily Harris, September 2015 Abstract Using an inter-disciplinary range of research on the home-space, home-making practices and the concept of ‘dwelling’, I achieve a new understanding of a central thematic concern in Genesis: its characters’ struggle to build stable, lasting homes upon the earth. Genesis starts with a lost home-space named Eden, before progressing towards other temporary dwellings such as the ark Noah builds, and Abraham’s tents. The biblical ‘home’ is constructed from a mix of materials: the birth of children, divine instructions and journeys, dreams, homemaking acts and so on. Alongside social scientific criticism, this thesis uses literary and midrashic intertexts as a way into re-imagining the ‘unhomely’ experiences of certain characters, or drawing out tensions in acts such as home-unmaking or homecomings. The investigation of the concept of ‘home’ in Genesis contributes to the study of this space more widely, as well as reinterpreting familiar biblical themes such as identity, family and community. Acknowledgements With thanks to my supervisors Dr. Sarah Nicholson and Dr. Heather Walton for their guidance. Contents Introduction There is a magic in that little world, home p.1 Methodology The makings of a house p.15 Chapter one - ‘Eden’ A lost home p.20 Chapter two - ‘Exile’ To make an end p.41 Chapter three - ‘Homeland’ Entering the tents p.60 Chapter four - ‘Homecoming’ Stealing Away, We Returned p.80 Conclusion Dwelling, then, brings us home p.99 Bibliography p.103 In the beginning There is a magic in that little world, home1 ‘to face homeward is a turn toward the most primordial of places’2 The first book of the Hebrew Bible3 begins with the world as a a ‘formless void’,4 ready for God’s inscription. In the first passage of Genesis, God shapes raw materials into ‘Earth and the cosmos we inhabit’.5 A habitable space has been crafted, upon which the Hebrew Bible’s mythical figures will trace their well-known histories in the book of Genesis ,bereshit. This Hebrew phrase ;’בְּרֵ אשִׁית‘ and beyond. The first word, in the Hebrew, is translated as ‘in the beginning’, is also the book’s name in Jewish scriptures. With bereshit, as and in ’ב‘ the Jewish writer Elie Wiesel identifies, ‘The Bible begins with the letter bet or Hebrew, ‘Bet is a house’.6 Mimi Levy Lipis, a cultural studies researcher, has also noted that the letter’s acrophonic name means house in Hebrew; furthermore, she argues that its visual shape can be read as the ‘simplest depiction of the floor plan of a house […] a square with an opening for the door’.7 For Lipis, the strong ‘base line’ of the letter bet symbolises the house’s ‘roots’ in its environment, and ‘rootedness’ is itself an important theme throughout Genesis,8 one I will return to in each chapter. In a similar vein, the Hebrew Bible scholar Aviva Gottlieb 1 Robert Southey, English poet and writer. 2 Forrest Clingerman, ‘Homecoming and the Half-Remembered: Environmental Amnesia, the Uncanny and the Path Home’ in Daniel Boscaljon, ed. Resisting the Place of Belonging: Uncanny Homecomings in Religion, Narrative and the Arts (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013), pp.33-46, p.41. 3 Known as the ‘Tanakh’ to Jewish people and the ‘Old Testament’ to Christians, I will refer to it as the ‘Hebrew Bible’. 4 Genesis chapter one, verse two - The Bible with Apocrypha: New Revised Standard Version (Oxford: University Press, 1995). All following biblical references taken from the NRSV will be indicated in-text in brackets. 5 Anne Elvey, ‘Matter, Freedom and the Future: Reframing Feminist Theologies through an Ecological Materialist Lens’, Feminist Theology Vol 32, No. 2 (2015), pp.186-204, p.187. 6 Elie Wiesel, ‘Longing for Home’ in Rouner, Leroy S. The Longing for Home (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996), pp.17-29, p.17. 7 Mimi Levi Lipis, Symbolic Houses in Judaism: how objects and metaphors construct hybrid places of belonging (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), pp.119-21. This reminds me of a line in Gaston Bachelard’s The Poetics of Space: ‘Words - I often imagine this - are little houses…’ (Massachusetts: Beacon Press, 1992), p.147. 8 Ibid., p.121. Page !1 of !112 Zornberg sees the story of man as ‘the story of the quest for amidah, for a solid reality on which to base his life.’9 The letter bet is our way into these questions. his habitable earth10 The opening chapters of Genesis constitute the ‘description of a home - the world’, as Lipis phrases it, and it is only after their ‘dwelling place [is] completed’11 that the first humans are made. The world is a house on a grand scale. As it is phrased in Isaiah: ‘He did not create it [the world] a waste [tohu]; but formed it for habitation’.12 A theoretical discourse through we can understand the world as ‘home’ on a larger scale is that of ecofeminism. ‘As oikos (Greek for home) translates to the English prefix eco of ecology’, Kimberly Carfore argues, ‘it is important to extend our conception of home to include earth as home’.13 Karen J Warren, an eco-feminist philosopher, writes: it is here, on planet earth that we build our houses, establish intentional communities […] it is on the planet earth that we build our earthly homes. The earth truly is our home.14 When the sky is formed, in Robert Alter’s (1996) translation, it is a ‘vault’ which divides the water: ‘The Hebrew’, he notes, ‘suggests a hammered-out slab’ so ‘the English architectural term [is] appropriate.’15 This idea of the sky as a roof is present elsewhere, as the Bible scholar and rabbi Benno Jacob identified in his early twentieth century commentary on Genesis: ‘[i]n other biblical passages [the sky] which seems to arch over the earth is described 9 Aviva Gottlieb Zornberg, The Beginning of Desire: Reflections on Genesis (New York: Schocken Books, 1995), p.24. 10 Proverbs 8:30-31 (Soncino translation), quoted by Zornberg, pp.110-1. 11 Lipis, pp.121-2. 12 Isaiah 45:18, referenced by Zornberg, p.132. 13 Kimberly Carfore, ‘The Paradox of Homecoming: Home is Where the Haunt Is’, in Daniel Boscaljon, ed. Resisting the Place of Belonging (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013), pp.61-72, p.69. 14 Warren, p.228, her italics. 15 Robert Alter, Genesis: Translation and Commentary (London: W.W. Norton and Company, 1996), p.3 - I will use Alter’s translation throughout my thesis in addition to the NRSV, in order to compare word choices, and to make use of Alter’s valuable explanatory notes. Page !2 of !112 as […] like the roof of a tent’.16 The sky/roof’s placement is followed by land and sea (1:9-10): the ‘dry land’, of course, will be the ‘habitation of men’,17 and can be viewed within this world/house metaphor as the floor or ‘foundation’ of the earth/home. Plants and trees (1:11-2) follow, and after four days, in Jacob’s words: ‘the house of the world is ready for its inhabitants.’18 What began as a silent, empty wasteland has been shaped into an expectant dwelling-place. What has occurred in this first chapter is the establishment of a setting, within which – ostensibly – the narrative events of the following chapters and biblical books occur. The creation of this peaceful, fertile environment is God’s first act: the framework is put in place before it is storied, before ‘everything […] happens and lives’,19 as Jacob puts it. In verse twenty-seven, the final inhabitants of the earth are created: man and woman. God is an ‘architect’ here, who ‘builds man’s house, furnishes it and places him at a well decked table’.20 The world is His ‘founding construction’,21 to use Iris Marion Young’s phrase. One of the central concerns of the book of Genesis is thus contained within its very first letter, the bet of bereshit, which foregrounds the idea of a house, and stability. In the Bible, ‘the home precedes everything else’,22 to use Wiesel’s words: this is true on both a typographical and thematic level. Furthermore, its presence is not limited to Genesis chapter one: ‘In the tissue of words of Genesis,’ the biblical critic Mieke Bal has written, ‘the house is surely a motif of great importance’.23 For a reader of the Hebrew, on a micro-level, each reoccurrence 16 Jacob gives the example of Isaiah 40:22 (‘It is he… who stretches out the heavens like a curtain,| and spreads them like a tent to live in’, NRSV) - Benno Jacob, The First Book of the Bible: Genesis Abridged, edited and translated by Jacob, Dr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Put Some Past in Your Future Hebrew and the Contemporary Jewish Experience
    CHAPTER 1 Put Some Past in Your Future Hebrew and the Contemporary Jewish Experience הַכְּתָ ב הָעִבְרִ י וְהָעַרְ בִ י הוֹלְכִים Hebrew and Arabic writing go מִ ּ ִ מ ְז רָ ח לְ מַ ֲע רָ ב ,from east to west הַכְּתָב הַ ּלָטִ ינִי, מִ ַּ מעֲרָ ב לְמִ זְרָ ח .Latin writing, from west to east ;שׂפוֹת הֵן כְּמוֹ חֲתוֹלִ ים :Languages are like cats .אָ סוּר לָבוֹא בָהֶן נֶגֶד כִּוּוּן הַ שְּׂ עָרוֹת You must not stroke their hair the wrong way. ְיהוּ ָדה ַע ִּמ ַיחי, ׁ ִשיר ְז ַמ ִּני Yehuda Amichai, Temporary Poem of My Time— Translation by Barbara and Benjamin Harshav Though this book is written in English, as we saw in the introduction even a very basic understanding of Hebrew roots and how they work can enrich our Jewish lives, wherever we live and whether or not we use Hebrew on a daily basis. This chapter digs much deeper, unpacking the ways in which Hebrew can be an asset in all our Jewish doings, so much of which are wrapped up in our ongoing dialogue with words and texts. We’ll explore this 2 PUT SOME PAST IN YOUR FUTURE idea not just in theory but through concrete discussions of particular words—their roots, meanings, and significance. Hebrew is one of the few aspects of Jewish life that can truly transcend all historical periods and all religious, political, and ethnic schisms. It’s a bridge builder that connects our Jewish lives and worlds. As we examine so-called religious terminology throughout this chapter (Torah, holiness, halachah, aggadah—Jewish normative and narrative traditions), it should become clear that these are not the sole property of religiously observant Jews, but rather are key ideas that can inform and inspire all kinds of Jewish doing.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam, the Fall, and Original Sin Baker Academic, a Division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2014
    Adam, the Fall, and Original Sin Theological, Biblical, and Scientific Perspectives EDITED BY Hans Madueme and Michael Reeves k Hans Madueme and Michael Reeves, Adam, The Fall, and Original Sin Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2014. Used by permission. (Unpublished manuscript—copyright protected Baker Publishing Group) MaduemeReeves_Adam_LC_wo.indd iii 9/17/14 7:47 AM © 2014 by Hans Madueme and Michael Reeves Published by Baker Academic a division of Baker Publishing Group P.O. Box 6287, Grand Rapids, MI 49516-6287 www.bakeracademic.com Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—for example, electronic, photocopy, recording—without the prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is brief quotations in printed reviews. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Adam, the fall, and original sin : theological, biblical, and scientific perspectives / Hans Madueme and Michael Reeves, editors. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8010-3992-8 (pbk.) 1. Sin, Original. 2. Adam (Biblical figure) 3. Fall of man. I. Madueme, Hans, 1975– editor. BT720.A33 2014 233 .14—dc23 2014021973 Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. ESV Text Edition: 2011 Scripture quotations labeled NASB are from the New American Standard Bible®, copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelicalism's Search for Chronological Gaps in Genesis 5
    JETS 61.1 (2018): 5–25 EVANGELICALISM’S SEARCH FOR CHRONOLOGICAL GAPS IN GENESIS 5 AND 11: A HISTORICAL, HERMENEUTICAL, AND LINGUISTIC CRITIQUE JEREMY SEXTON* Abstract: This article sheds historical light on William Henry Green’s influential article -translated “be) ילד Primeval Chronology” (1890), establishes the meaning of the hiphil of“ gat” in the AV) throughout Genesis 5 and 11, and analyzes Andrew Steinmann’s recent case for chronological gaps. Interpreters did not challenge the chronological intent of the Genesis ge- nealogies until the ascendancy of Darwinism in the 1860s. Green’s article became the most famous attempt to disrupt the timeline. As a young scholar, Green had ardently defended the chronology, but prevailing scientific claims finally compelled him to abandon this conviction. Re- cent scholarship (as well as a censored article from the mid-1890s) has demonstrated that Green only showed the possibility of genealogical gaps, which do not entail chronological gaps. Steinmann bases his unprecedented argument for chronological gaps on an idiosyncratic seman- that contradicts the consensus among (ילד tics of causation (which he applies to the hiphil of Hebraists and other linguists. Key words: Genesis 5, Genesis 11, genealogies, chronology, historical Adam, age of human- ity, William H. Green, Old Princeton, science and Scripture, hermeneutics, Hebrew grammar, semantics of causation ,ילד hiphil of Biblical interpreters did not challenge the chronological intent of the genealo- gies in Genesis 5 and 11 until the nineteenth century.1 The uNaNimous aNd oft- * Jeremy Sexton is pastor of Christ the King Church, 2537 N. Broadway Ave., Springfield, MO 65803. He can be reached at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Creationism a Valley Bible Church Position Paper
    Creationism A Valley Bible Church Position Paper www.valleybible.net The book of Genesis describes the creation of the heavens and the earth. God is described as the Creator and the process of His creation is shown in the first two chapters of Genesis. This paper will address what the Bible says about creation, including who created, how creation occurred and when creation occurred. We believe that God communicated truthfully about the creation account in Genesis 1-2. We also believe that God’s Word is the final source of authority on all matters that it touches, including how all things were made. In other words, we believe what God says is more important than what anyone else says about the creation of the universe. If this view of the Bible is not accepted, then the following presentation will carry no weight. Before we address the teaching of the Bible on the subject of creation, we must agree on the significance of what it teaches. We have designed this paper with the understanding that the reader accepts the authority of the Word of God. God created all things That God is the Creator of all is taught throughout the Bible. 1. God created the heavens and the earth (Psalm 33:6; Jonah 1:9; Jeremiah 32:17; Revelation 14:7). 2. God created all that is in the heavens and the earth (Nehemiah 9:6; Revelation 10:6; Acts 14:15). 3. God created the heavens and the earth from the beginning (Genesis 1:1; Hebrews 1:10). 4. God created the heavens and the earth from nothing that was visible (Hebrews 11:3).
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis Bibliography
    1 Genesis Bibliography Ted Hildebrandt Gordon College, 2004 2 Top Picks Alter, Robert. The Art of Biblical Narrative. (New York: Basic Books, 1981). Borgman, Paul C. Genesis: The Story We Haven’t Heard (Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press, 2001). Brueggemann, Walter. Genesis: in Bible commentary for teaching and preaching (Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1982). Hamilton, Victor. The Book of Genesis, Chapters 1-17. NICOT (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990). ________. The Book of Genesis 18-50 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995). Longacre, R. E. Joseph: A Story of Divine Providence. (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1989). Waltke, Bruce K. and Cathi Fredricks. Genesis (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2001). Walton, John H. Genesis in the NIV Application Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2001). Wenham, Gordon, J. Genesis 1-15. Word Biblical Commentary (Waco, TX: Word Books, Publisher, 1987). _________. Genesis 16-50. Word Biblical Commentary (Waco, TX: Word Books, Publisher, 1994). Westermann, Claus. Genesis 1-11: A Commentary (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1984-86). _________. Genesis 12-36: A Commentary (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1984-86). _________. Genesis 36-50: A Commentary (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1984-86). 3 Alphabetic Table of Contents click on the letter and go, click on the page numbers to return click on the binoculars to search, click on the magnifying glass to zoom in If you find any errors or find additions please contact: [email protected] A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 4 A Aalders, G. Charles. Genesis. Grand Rapids,: Zondervan Pub. House, 1981. Aaron, David H.
    [Show full text]
  • Gracetemple Reverend Dr
    GraceTemple Reverend Dr. Charles L. McNeil, Sr., Senior Pastor 15 E. Charleston Avenue Lawnside, New Jersey 08045 BAPTIST CHURCH www.gracetemplebaptist.org A STUDY OF THE WHOLE BIBLE THE BOOK OF GENESIS THE DOWNWARD SPIRAL OF SIN (4:1-11:26) The Place of the Passage Sometimes sin has immediate consequences; sometimes it does not. In the previous chapter, we saw sin’s immediate consequences. Adam and Eve realized they were naked, they hid from God, and God punished them for their sins. In this section of Genesis, we see the longer-term consequences of sin—how it just seems to get worse and worse. The scope of Genesis 4-11 is the “big picture”: instead of the earth being filled with representatives of God, the earth is filled with the consequences of sin. Nevertheless, God’s grace abounds even in the face of our sin. Glimpses of his mercy are evident amid this big picture of the spread of sin with Seth, Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth, and this prepares the way for the zeroed in focus beginning in chapter 12 on Abraham, who will bring blessings to the nations. The Big Picture The fall initiates a downward spiral of sin, beginning with Cain’s murder of Abel and culminating in the Tower of Babel. Discussion In order to get a basic snapshot of this period, skim through the following passages and jot down brief answers to the following questions: How does sin spread? What is God’s punishment for that sin? How do you see God’s grace in this passage? Cain and Abel (Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogies and Spiritualities in Genesis 4:17-22, 4:25-26, 5:1-32
    Acta Theologica Supplementum 8 2006 GENEALOGIES AND SPIRITUALITIES IN GENESIS 4:17-22, 4:25-26, 5:1-32 C. Lombaard1 ABSTRACT The three genealogies in Genesis 4:17-22, 4:25-26 en 5:1-32 show different intentions: the first wants (amongst other purposes) to give an aetiology of the trades; the second wants to stress the importance of a new beginning; the third wants to relate Adam to Noah. Each of these approaches to genealogy has a different intent; each wants to in- dicate a different aspect of God’s care. Each thus evidences an own (though not unre- lated) configuration of faith experienced, that is, a different spirituality. 1. OF FAITH IN OLD TESTAMENT TIMES, THE STUDY OF SPIRITUALITY, AND GENEALOGY SCHOLARSHIP Recent Old Testament scholarship has increasingly become aware of the variety of configurations of faith within ancient Israel. This diversity does not involve only a rather straightforward growth in the faith of Israel from one form of belief in God to, presumably, a more advanced form of belief in God. Such a heilsgeschichtliche approach — in the earlier sense of the term (cf. Mildenberger 2000:1585) — would be akin to the concept of progressive revelation, a view which regarded Old Testament history as a process of divine education of the Israelite nation (Rogerson 1988:537; cf. also Lombaard 2003:441). Rather, Old Testament scholarship has made us increasingly aware of different forms of faith within ancient Israel at different times, also with such different expressions competing with one another at the same time. Particularly useful in this regard have been formulations such as those by Rainer Albertz and Philip Davies, the former referring to “Religionsinterner Pluralismus” (Albertz 1978), the latter to “Judaisms” 1 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Genesis 5 and 11: a Closer Look at the Chronogenealogies
    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Vol. 53, No. 2, 253-277. Copyright © 2015 Andrews University Seminary Studies. REVISITING GENESIS 5 AND 11: A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CHRONOGENEALOGIES BERNARD WHITE Busan, South Korea The genealogies of Gen 5 and 11 are unique in the Scripture record. Gerhard Hasel’s term chronogenealogy captures a major aspect of that uniqueness: they are genealogies with a major chronological component.1 By including ages at the birth of each named son, the number of years each individual lived after begetting that son, and the stated or implied total years of life for each individual, the two genealogies appear to provide a means by which to calculate the approximate number of years from Adam to Abraham.2 For 1Gerhard F. Hasel, “Genesis 5 and 11: Chronogenealogies in the Biblical History of Beginnings,” Origins 7.1 (1980): 23–37; “The Meaning of the Chronogenealogies of Genesis 5 and 11,” Origins 7.2 (1980): 53–70. Hasel’s term seems to have been adopted only by those inclined to accept a prima facie chronological intent of the two genealogies. See, for example, Jonathan Sarfati, “Biblical Chronogenealogies,” TJ 17.3 (2003): 14-18; Travis R. Freeman, “The Genesis 5 and 11 Fluidity Question,” TJ 19.2 (2005): 83–90. Chronological data is occasionally found in other genealogical material (Ex 6:16, 18, 20; 1 Chron 2:21); the significance of these ‘rarities’ will be explored at a later point in this paper. 2Bishop Ussher famously did just that—with injudicious precision!—in the mid-seventeenth century. But it is a pity that his name alone is so often cited in this respect, with the implication that using the chronological details of Gen 5 and 11 to estimate time since creation is to follow in his steps.
    [Show full text]
  • Moses' Design in the Genesis Genealogy
    Moses’ Design in the Genesis Genealogy By Gioacchino Michael Cascione November 20, 2012 Over the centuries, scholars have published excellent studies on Old Testament genealogy and chronology. However, rarely do they write about the design of the genealogy. Chapter Eleven of In Search of the Biblical Order , published in 2012 by RedeemerPress.org, and available through Northwestern Publishing House, explores the origin of genealogical patterns recorded in Matthew and Luke. This article expands this focus by investigating the relationship between text and numbers in the genealogy of Genesis. We begin by comparing the genealogical patterns within Genesis. These patterns are a paradigm for genealogical patterns in Matthew, Luke, Ezra, and Nehemiah. Genesis chapters 4 and 5 record two lines of descent from Adam, Cain and Seth. After the flood, the most important genealogy is Shem to Abraham, found in Genesis chapter 11. The more significant genealogies include the number of years these patriarchs lived. There are remarkable similarities and differences between the three lines of genealogy in Figure 1. For example, each list contains 10 names; women (not included in these three lists) are rarely named as matriarchs; similar names appear in the first two lists; God does not use Cain’s genealogy to mark time; Cain’s genealogy also includes Lamech’s three sons, Jabal, Jubal, and Tubalcain; and Seth’s genealogy includes the ages of the patriarchs and the year their sons were born. In Search of the Biblical Order asserts that symbolic numerical patterns in Revelation have their literal source in Genesis. The predominant numerical patterns in Revelation are 7, 10, and their multiples, and these are also prevalent in the Genesis genealogies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genealogies of Genesis 5 & 11
    ETS Conference Nov 17, 2016 San Antonio, TX The Genealogies of Genesis 5 & 11: Reasons for Understanding These as Gapless Chronologies J. Paul Tanner, ThM, PhD [email protected] Introduction This paper is concerned with the genealogies given in Genesis 5 and 11 and the bearing they might have on the dating of the creation account (Gen 1–2) and the flood event (Gen 7–9). Specifically the question is whether the genealogies in Gen 5 and 11 are “tight chronologies” or whether they have “gaps” (missing names). The question is not a moot one. If the latter is the case, then admittedly one cannot merely add up the numbers between Abraham and Adam to calculate the date of the creation account in Gen 1–2. The argument that Gen 5 and 11 have gaps was given classic expression in an article by W. H. Green in 1890, an article that has subsequently had significant influence on evangelical scholars.1 More recently, a number of modern evangelical commentators have embraced the idea that there are gaps, including Gordon Wenham, Victor Hamilton, and Kenneth Matthews, as well as other OT scholars such as Gleason Archer.2 Numerous studies have been done on biblical chronologies in an effort to understand their purpose and function.3 The Old Testament alone has something like twenty-five genealogies of varying complexity. In general scholars distinguish two categories of biblical genealogies: linear (or vertical) genealogies and segmented (or horizontal) genealogies. Linear genealogies simply trace an unbroken line of descendants, whereas segmented genealogies trace more than one line of descent from a common ancestor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Functions of the Biblical Genealogies
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Faculty Publications 2016 The Role and Functions of the Biblical Genealogies Paul Ray Andrews University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/pubs Part of the Biblical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Ray, Paul, "The Role and Functions of the Biblical Genealogies" (2016). Faculty Publications. 192. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/pubs/192 This Contribution to Book is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2 The Role and Functions of the Biblical Genealogies Paul J. Ray, Jr. Introduction nterest in the biblical genealogies was cultivated as early as the post- exilic period. The authors of the various Apocryphal (Tob 1:1–2), I Pseudepigraphal (Jubilees 4:1–33), NT (Matt 1:1–17), and Rabbinic writings (b. Pes 62b) produced at that time considered this type of literature to be historically accurate. This was the dominant position until the latter half of the nineteenth century when serious doubts were raised concerning the use of this material for writing history. Ancient Near Eastern parallels to the early parts of Genesis led scholars to suspect that their biblical counterparts might have been extracted from these early legends and myths. It was also discovered through ethnographical data, that tribal societies, like ancient Israel, 1 used genealogies to express political and social relationships between families, and 1 For the latest critique on tribalism, see Piotr Bienkowski, “‘Tribalism’ and ‘Segmentary Society’ in Iron Age Transjordan,” in Studies on Iron Age Moab and Neighbouring Areas in Honour of Michèle Daviau , ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Kingdom Prologue, by Meredith Kline, Hildebrandt, Lecture 2
    1 Dr. Meredith Kline, Prologue, Lecture 2 © 2012, Dr. Meredith Kline and Ted Hildebrandt The covenant of common grace is an interim situation in which believers and non- believers can coexist politically and otherwise. It was a completely different covenant of common grace as opposed to this covenant of salvation. Palmer Robinson used to confuse these; all kinds of people are confused. If you confuse these two you’re going to end up completely unable to handle properly the questions of: “What is the State?”, “What is the Church?”, and “What are the functions of the two?” You’re going to get them all confused. So that’s one of the big important things that we’re going to deal when we come back to that section. Genesis 10 Table of Nations: The City of Man once again Alright! Now here we are chapter 10 verse 1 and following. This is the story once again of the City of Man. Remember what you have in chapter 10--the table of nations? It is the account of how after the flood the world is repopulated through the three sons of Noah. It isn't just obviously God’s people, the Covenant People, but here’s mankind in general spread all over the earth and many of them are unbelievers. So some are believers and some are non-believers. But this is the story of the City of Man. And, by the way, the City of Man, as I said, in itself is a legitimate thing. God instituted it. It’s perfectly good.
    [Show full text]