LUTP-7th BATCH STRENGTHENING INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS TOWARDS INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT CASE OF

By, Thiru. A. Krishna Kumar Thiru. R. Shiva Kumar CHENNAI METROPOLITAN 1189 sq.km 2 AREA Extent of CMA Corporations GCC and Avadi 7 Municipalities 426 sq.km 11 GCC Area 10 Town Panchayats Panchayat86.5497.72 Lakh Unions people CMA Population ( Census (2018 Projected)2011) 46.4670.9 Lakh Lakh people City Population (2018(Census Projected) 2011) 77 pph CMA GREATER Population 109 pph CHENNAI CORPORATION Density City Population 2 Density ROAD NETWORK OF CMA

To Nellore To Minjur

TRANSPORTATION NETWORK

To Thiruvallur 6010 km 387.35 km Roads BRR Maintained by 5622.6km3740 GCC & DoH InteriorBuses Roads With 684 routes 89.4 km Sub-Urban Commuter Rail To Bangalore Roads 19.5 km

MRTS Ring Roads 5km stretch -Velachery to St.Thomas Mount under progress peak demand of 45.1 km around 24,000 Metro Rail passengers per hour Phase 2 – 119km per direction under progress 3 To Thiruchirapally To Siruseri No. of Accidents over the years

157 lakh TRANSPORTATION SCENARIO All Trips (Daily) 28.20% Motorized PT Modal Share over the years mode share Registered vehicle Composition(Bus + Rail) in Chennai,2018 50% Average Trip length for each mode Cars & 45% Jeep 12.9 km 1% 40% 2% 1.2 km Buses 10.3 km 1.6216% 35% 2% 30% Per Capita Trip 30% 1% Trucks 25% Rate 25% 2.9 km 22% (Including Walking Trips) Auto 20% 6.4 km 79% 15% 10.5 km 13.2 km Motor Cabs 10% 7% 7% 6% 3% 5% 9.9 kmTwo Wheelers 0% Average Trip Walk Bicycle Auto-rickshaw Car/van Two-wheeler Bus Train Length

4 1970 1984 1992 2008 2015 2018 CENTRAL AGENCIES STATE AGENCIES

Chennai Metropolitan Greater Development National Highway Chennai Authority Authority of India Southern Corporation Railways

STAKEHOLDERS IN CENTRE – STATE AGENCIES TRANSPORTATION SETC SECTOR OF CHENNAI METROPOLITAN AREA Smart Greater Chennai RTO Chennai city Rail Limited Traffic Police

INSITUTIONAL AGENCIES

PWD

Indian Institute of Anna Technology University STAKEHOLDERS

PLANNING AUTHORITY - CMDA

• CMDA is the planning body • But depending upon the scope, sector Physical Economical Social Planning and jurisdiction of the project, the Planning Planning implementing agencies would vary

Transportation Road Water Infrastructure

DoH NHAI GCC CMWSSB GCC MTC CMRL S.Rly

6 PLANS FOR CMA

Madras Urban Madras Urban Project • Identified 20yr • Prepared by Interim • Development of (1st CTTS) Prepared by programme • Prepared by • Prepared by Madras Greater Madras Plan Thiru.C.Ramdas • Allocated First187 Master Plan Alan Turner & CTTS Alan Turner & CMP Corporation 1970 1967 IAS crores for 1974 Associates 1992 Associates 2019 • Aimed to • Recommended transport • Recommended • Recommended provide improvements improvement Inner rail Inner rail organized in utility & incl. road, rail , corridor, corridor, growth of the services airport & Parking policy Parking policy city harbour etc. etc.

• • Prepared by • Prepared by DTP • Prepared by • Prepared by ‘RITES,PTC & • Recommended Thiru.Badrinath MMDA • Kirloskar establishment IAS • RecommendedPrepared Landa • UMTA Proposed of MMDA, land • Recommended listuse planof projectsand DR 1957 1968 1971 • 1980 2008 use plan with 8 establishment likeORR< MRTSroads,, Metropolitan General zones and ZR of MMDA, Madras bridges, Structural Plan CCTS Town Plan Economic &Metropolitan subways, truck Planning Social Plan terminals, etc for immediate Scheme Development Plan implementation

7 PLANNING TO IMPLEMENTATION

Identification of projects Implementation of Planning of projects in based on funding and Projects by different Master Plan by CMDA implementation agencies mechanism

▪ Since the agencies who plan and implement the projects are different, ▫ There is a lag in co-ordination which disrupts project implementation, ▫ Overlapping of projects is not taken into consideration, ▫ Funding of projects is also a major concern.

▪ Project implementation and finalization not decided by the planning body (CMDA) hence,

8 the project when implemented deviates from the actual plan. NEW TOWN KWMC & CMBT TERMINALS DEVELOPMENT Shifting of core Madhavaram MM Nagar & utilities to Bus terminal & Manali exterior area Kilambakkam Bus Terminal CONTAINER IRON AND TERMINAL STEEL MARKET At

At Sathangadu TRANSPORTATION

Manjambakkam INFRASTRUCTURE CMDA AND Long Long Term projects STRATERGIES ITS’S

Long Term projectsTermLong INNER RING ORR

STRATERGIES ROAD to EXECUTED DECONGESTION DECONGESTION Adambakkam to Minjur Madhavaram to PROJECTS Minjur

NH BYPASS MRTS INTERMEDIATE 19.5 km RING ROAD completed Bypass not an Urban Road 9 MINI FLYOVERS GRADE STATION STRATERGIES MANAGEMENT

32 Flyovers SEPARARTORS UPGRADATION Short projects & Term Medium throughout Kathipara, At and Chennai , Padi Tondiarpet TRANSPORTATION & Maduravoyal

SIGNAL LEVEL IMPROVEMENTS CROSSINGS CMDA AND Through funding At all grade from World Bank separators in ITS’S via TNUDP Phased manner EXECUTED PROJECTS

ELEVATED ELEVATED CORRIDOR ROAD From Airport to From Port to PLANNING Chengalpet Toll Maduravoyal

Plaza

Long Term projectsTermLong TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION

10 POLCIES AND STUDIES

▪ NMT Policy ▪ Utilization of 50m strip adjoining ORR ▪ Parking Policy ▪ Transport System ▪ CTTS-1972,1992 Management for KWMC& ▪ CCTS - 2008 CMBT ▪ Multi Modal Integration ▪ FoB at Egmore & VoC Nagar ▪ Local Area Traffic Plan ▪ FoB at Alandur & Arumbakkam ▪ Densification along MRTS ▪ Utilization of space beneath Corridor Flyovers ISSUES IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT IMPROVEMENT

 Lack of Land-use Transport Integration

 Lack of NMT Facilities

 Need For Parking Policy

 Lack of Integration

 Route Integration, Operation And Service Integration

 Technological Integration

 Institutional Integration CURRENT SCENARIO

 Though the City has various infrastructure policies (mostly planned in 1974), the PT Share is still at 28%.

IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING

PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED REASONS FOR LAG IN PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

 Lack of Co-ordination between agencies

 Different agencies for planning and implementation

 Jurisdiction restrictions

 Lack of monitoring project implementation

 No specific regulatory body

 Funding issues

This paves the need for a UNIFIED METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY In future, this will be sorted out by CUMTA, since it But,Time there to Timewould is a Traffic huge act timeas and a facilitator lagTransportation in planning for any & issues execution have owingbeenprojects/studies/policy identifiedto the lack and of integration addressed with atand prioritizing different communication levels the of projects for implementationbetweenimplementation agencies along with funding & monitoring

15 THANK YOU

16