Downloaded By: [Farman, Jason] At: 21:53 1 February 2008 tt.Mc ntemne fRcadSchech- Richard of manner the ner’s in the Much and the state. practice orbit and performance the defined, between within so interaction practice performance’ their ‘community inclu- questions and of the pose artists community, of to of sion self- flexibility constitution of the the ( aims about text change’ for the people, political allows of and group non- expression expression diverse creative perfor- a relatively facilitates that for community the ‘work is that with mance assessment work committal accessible but with access. experi- dialogue material seeing, and in of ence formation conditions historical dominant culturally an sentimental ‘community’, as of as plenitude but not reified the field for yearning the elucidates practices rprtr amu,‘setn h breath space, ( taking be’ the to action: place political a claiming ‘asserting first the [became] warm-up, preparatory hoeia ee,tems aifigesy attend essays satisfying a most At the project. level, and the theoretical errors compromise spelling references level, is omitted whole procedural a a as At text this uneven. exciting, are Though categories ‘practices’. these and challenge’, embodiment, ‘rituals, ‘environments’, ‘relations’, ‘pedagogical communities’, themes: van five around example, Eugene commissioned structured newly essays, Freire, with (for Kershaw) Boal, Baz and Moral from field Erven extracts a the and as Act’ ‘Performing in Conquergood’s writers Dwight familiar essays existing by together brings efface It reflection. critical to not Reader desire to and speak ambition they difficulty. but text’s scope, the their in overwhelming differ- conceal of ( to ability ence’ performance ‘the consider in example, key ‘‘communitas’’ to for exer- reader-practitioner problems; from ‘reflection associated the Victor suggested asking and quotations alongside cises’ Anderson sit Benedict through Extended Turner as run such in exercises text. thinkers or research examples and the narrative studies, operating practice case authoritative to of Structured opposed single competition. as a working another, within features questions, one the it of beside methodologies sense bricolage a and visual gives projects design of this quality by or the lent practitioners me, For from navigable theorists. citations easily by containing supplemented and boxes chapter, each compact through offers pathways text body’ upr pn hsmtclul researched meticulously this opens Kuppers fthe If efrac Studies Performance CI od u h rms fmr in-depth more of promise the out holds 5.Smtmsteeqetosseem questions these Sometimes 35). , Introduction spthda ud,the guide, a as pitched is CI 3.Ti igigof mingling This 43). , 20) h ‘main the (2002), CI ) This 3). , otiuin yBrySih–i nedtemost the indeed is – Smith Barry by contributions book, n ifrn ah hog h aeil ( material’ will that the through practitioners suggesting paths and different by find teachers opens readers, and ‘different ( rich, the less although undeniably play’ other, And, with at celebrations. contrasts critical issues example this political However, I see a where situation the could with extraordinary community, an the me presented to prize provide ‘‘good’’ bring than to moment ‘rather home, that care Becky Dutch a concludes in Generosity Choirs. residency short ‘The her upon Movement Project’, reflection fine excellent Laban’s Berson’s Shaw’s Jess of with Women Bush tension analysis Urban productive instantiated of in work sits community dance the Gonzalez’s of through Anita practice. account of detail interesting the to closely iy n promne r oe-ne,and ( project’ ‘open-ended, political specific are and a describes ‘performance’ Kuppers neither ‘commu- and that given observation nity’ especially opening sections, each Robertson’s to the introductions editorial of the in direction reader more the from to benefited have perhaps may it nuuulcmimn ocmuiythinking’ community to ( shares commitment that unusual field dedicated gathering an a unusually rather few, but a individuals, not ‘represents mance ( dialogue’ yield high possibility low-cost, ‘the invokes of introduction such One 3). pnigoe 0 ae,SeeDxnsnew Dixon’s Steve pages, 800 over Spanning Farman Jason pp, 825 2007, (hardback) Press, 0-262-04235-5 MIT ISBN: The MA: Cambridge, Installa- and tion Art, Performance in Media Dance, New Theater, of History A Performance: Digital Ó in community of category of performance. the conditions in the interest into increased enquiry further for avenues nrdcint the to introduction languages. associated their administrative and structures contemporary analytic might towards critical projects more perspective books’ of a against the creation mitigate the whether sometimes – facilitate to to work as desire question performance a community prompting by generated CR 07Lus Owen Louise 2007 f sKpesadRbrsnwiei the in write Robertson and Kuppers as If, )te hs rdciebosoe up open books productive these then 2) , ySeeDixon Steve by iia Performance Digital Reader omnt perfor- community , ihsubstantial with – CR CR Reader CR 131). , 151) , CR 7), , 583 is , Downloaded By: [Farman, Jason] At: 21:53 1 February 2008 fdpha oet swl ot the worth well thor- this is in discussed moments topics survey. ough of at range substantial sacrifice amazing inter- depth the be very opinion, some to my of In of there performances. particulars covered esting allow the topics of not of discussion does breadth book’s the the often as seen weakness: theoretical This be major topic. also digital the can the of however, on and strength, topic written previously context, impressive the discussions an its on presents knowledge performance, that of and style clear breadth Dixon’s writing notice Here, but lively strengths. help greatest cannot book’s readers clues the immediately into book readers the of section tualization the Wooster in The given is of group book). the discussion attention short only Ander- (the very Laurie Group by a Paik, book and June Nam son, the of includ- 1970s, discussions of the ing from section art multi-media history analysing He 1960s. the and and late-1950s concludes and the 1920s, dada of the ‘happenings’ the of biomechanics, design multi-media Meyerhold’s surrealism, through of constructi- performance the vism manifestos, digital on) theatre continues futurist so of Dixon several (41). and genealogy interface’ video, the single all sound, a unifies image, modern within that (text, the ‘‘‘meta-medium’’ on media a in as reliance exemplified computer performance’s a media, as digital convergent served creative to and the artforms’ precursor was multiple .] of . [. the unification vision of Wagner’s notion Wagner Artwork). Richard his ‘with century, and it nineteenth tracing the performance, to digital of previously genealogy works depth other the topic. the in on time. gaps present published glaring are the and some addresses that importantly Arts that quite study the of for Performance part anticipated a Council-funded Archive research as (9). Performance Research Smith’s 1999 practitioners’ and Humanities in Dixon and with of started dealing practices out second Conceived specific the the of performance, contexts and first digital The theories, the histories, sections, date. of the two array examining into to wide divided a ‘broadly subject cover topics the chapters twenty-five on book’s study exhaustive ovnignwapoce otetheoretical the to approaches new convincing 584 Throughout contex- theoretical and analysis historical The in- an readers offers Dixon section, first the In sauiu n rlinl written brilliantly and unique a is iia Performance Digital hsbo a enwidely been has book this , Gesamtkunstwerk io offers Dixon , Digital Digital (Total icsino omnWieadLuaKikauka’s humorous performance, Laura and and 1988 White memorable Norman of section Dixon’s discussion the (229– bodies. out chapter a rounds on body’ by performances, followed cyborg physical robots, and on on the chapter ghostly A of already 230). always status the their ephemeral metapho- of power, and symbols poetic aesthetic The perfor- rical, bodies AIDS. the real the renders in of its virtuality bodies face ‘provides the projected the mance the in highlight of body to virtuality the of projections fragility In laserdisc is body. utilized the Pictures Type on Loving Pictures, section Dumb Dying the troupe in The discussed subsequent ‘Time’. performance and of ‘Space’, Japanese Body’, rubrics ‘The 235 on the sections these by of under majority large (accompanied performances a to frames performances and photographs) given of and dreds experience, (190). superlatives’ the were and Critics eulogies by unexplained. great enthralled overwhelming the affording the an supernatural, into the insights created and in ‘approaching a audience of performance’, moment sense the as from digital seminal ‘regarded gasps of was and development dancers which point ‘live’ a piece, turning material, on The the dances’ (188). behind same screen the to huge that figure performing computer hand-drawn bodies beautiful the animations and dancers’ into complex movements ‘create the their on relayed Cunningham’s markers Merce capture of digital discussion digital on BIPED a of chapter use this in the in the dance, is nonexistent.) of to performance discussions practically book in best media it’s the the subtle of of One so section is first perfor- second the specific proposed from that Dixon’s shift perspective, on chapters my (From extensively the mances. into more begins transition and elaborate dance subtle ‘theories’ digital the thoroughly extremely of on sides chapter focuses a both final section The on his with. offers theorists align of can that yet, example, subject approach well-worn, satisfying the for debates and to these ‘liveness’, approach of tired Some phenomenological become subject. the have of debates h yoga mlmtzdi h several the in emblematized of discussion as serious more cyborg a (275). by the followed sexuality’ is and This to technology the works of with copulation, fascination conjunction ‘contemporary for the together female exemplify fit and male that a robot designed performers the which iia Performance Digital 19) h efrac sdmotion used performance The (1999). hmFci’Robots Fuckin’ Them oso odsushun- discuss to on goes 19) h group the (1994), Lovers: ,in Downloaded By: [Farman, Jason] At: 21:53 1 February 2008 h lsro,i h har,adi hi own their Ó will in and and theatre, in engaging the again writing. in time book and classroom, time the entire it from the draw art net undoubtedly digital of find world the in and will theatre the interested both practi- in and tioners only Theorists cybertheory. those and as technology just as be will enthralled scholars studies the Performance throughout book. audiences multiple prolific, addresses fully most a theater’ popular are of (620). form to developing ‘videogames studies and effective, these how synthesizes show Dixon Press), Murray’s in MIT Janet studies as performance Holodeck been works to have live relation such media the these in on Though discussed bear as theatre. to of such CD-ROMs stage and topics games bring video is importantly space ‘Interactivity’ theatrical age. that digital the ways in the reconsidered success- develops section or this fully theater Ultimately, or drama (421). of new narrative’ with nature one essential sheds play the on we thinking, with light re- facility conventional room, or our own feature one fragments its new in every yields wards: happen Experimentation . . theater can . audience of think what to as ridiculous about becomes ideas It our theater. change co- Theater: to begin Repertory Reaves, experiments Stein ‘Our John is Gertrude in from the that of quotation director change’ has a paradigm in however, addressed ‘theatrical a discussed, many of common too performances Each far here. covers adequately the and discuss itself to of interest- performances and an in in rooms. made book have ing chat would reality section and ‘Space’ virtual The surveillance, wide webcams, a including perfor- mance, discuss telematic architecture, topics to liquid performance, on and of of goes Association, analyses variety and Builders in-depth Lepage The with Robert Coates, begins it George nearly pages, Spanning book. 200 the of diverse and engaging (306). matrix’ within technological wholeness alchemical, for an desire societies, uncertainties human Western a industrial spiritual re- symbolizing late within and technological crises existential and a to constitutes sponse cyborgism Go that Guillermo and Pen Stelarc by performances adsusd io rus Oronve is view own ‘Our argues, Dixon discussed. ˜a 07JsnFarman Jason 2007 hs nlscin ipa o io success- Dixon how display sections final These and ‘Time’ on book the of sections final The most the of one is ‘Space’ titled section The n h anthology the and is Person First alto the on Hamlet as by (also ´mez- ac rmter‘nones.JeKelleher’s Joe ‘encounters’. rele- their political and from social extra- vance thereby cultural, and some position, theatre, polating the subject of the ‘experience’ the charting contributor record Each to way. careful all own is their they in marking although merit individually, treat to contribution impossible of be each variety the would more given it and approaches, an title, critical and the in ‘betrays terms also three the plural but the (3). mass, of definition’ around use critical anxiety as the a process the importantly in as history throughout a plural well with the form in the And used imbuing splits is ideologically. geographically, various ‘theatres’ and finally the historically, economically given concept politically, out the teased within also ‘Eur- the is of embraces signification ope’ performance potential also The that encounter subsequently. with yet of engagement and moment (intellectual) the performance, of with in sense taken temporal is ‘Contemporary’ its title. the of definitions two. the between dialogue much tre publica- Lehmann’s readers Routledge potential (Hans-Thies another that tion a with recommend themselves to would in as arm I far practice context. as go postdramatic spectatorial in and to about see postmodern theatre they very contributors them that theatre what but the teaches the subject, the as them not that of all front is learn of degrees swiftly different concerns viewing We skewed primary a however. on a position, international based fear not the methodology need by faulty Historians possible circuit. touring made of festival been most has and thea- European UK tre contemporary the of in experiences work their All us. contributors lead the and an contributors, of twelve Kelleher such their from that and Ridout, far narrative is totalising of it impossible march However historical avant-garde. the the siting within in perspective, contemporary theatre quasi-historical the contemporary a an of from state expect Europe the might of book overview this approaching Readers Singleton Brian xvii 0-415-32940 2005, Routledge, London: Critical A Ridout Europe: in Companion Theatres Contemporary n edtetobosi adma hr is there as tandem in books two the read and ) ihsc ies e fapoce oec of each to approaches of set diverse a such With their out spell to careful are editors the First, dtdb o elhradNicholas and Kelleher Joe by edited otrmtcThea- Postdramatic þ 1 p ISBN pp, 214 585