DOCSLIB.ORG

America's History Eighth Edition Terms & Concepts – Unit 7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
America's History Eighth Edition Terms & Concepts – Unit 7 America’s History Eighth Edition Terms & Concepts – Unit 7 Chapter 13: Expansion, War, and Sectional Crisis, 1844-1860 Big Idea: What were the causes of the Mexican War, and in what ways did it bring about a growing sectional crisis during the 1850s? 1. Introduction o Expansionist surge of the 1840s had deep roots. o However, obstacles included Native Americans on the Great Plains, Mexico, and Britain o Expansionist James K. Polk is elected in 1844 (key election!) . New Mexico . California . Oregon o Territorial acquisitions ignited sectional debate over slavery 2. Manifest Destiny: North and South o Generational Shift – older statesmen (i.e. Clay, Webster, etc.) were more willing to compromise and/or avoid sectional issues. The new generation would not compromise. o The Push to the Pacific . John L. O’Sullivan and the coining of Manifest Destiny • Underlying rhetoric: Anglo-American superiority, republican ideals (spread American freedom and democracy), and spread Protestantism. Oregon – desired for its fertile farm land, particularly the Willamette Valley • Since 1818, the territory had been jointly held by Britain and the United States. • Oregon Trail • “Oregon Fever” • Settlers attempted to re-create life of the eastern states in the West (*caption on page 413) . California • California Trail – About 3,000 early pioneers settled along the Sacramento River. • Spanish Forts and Missions, 1770s • Mexican Independence in 1821 • American economic link to California (pg. 415) • Californios • Many Americans did not assimilate into Mexican society. o The Plains Indians . Unique ecology of the Great Plains – West of the 100th Meridian = semiarid region (“The Great American Desert”) . Nomadic buffalo-hunting tribes (Apache, Comanche, Kiowa, Cheyenne, Sioux, etc.) – students need to be familiar with some of these examples, especially the Comanche and the Lakota Sioux. Nomadic horse culture dominated the Great Plains . Many tribes were devastated by smallpox and other illnesses just as earlier tribes to the east had been. European weapons also altered the geography of the native peoples.\ . Dependence on the buffalo o The Fateful Election of 1844 . Changed American policy toward the Great Plains, the Far West, and Texas . Annexation of Texas • Southern leaders supported / northerners opposed expansion of slavery • Rumors of British desires to keep Texas independent, take California and possibly Spanish Cuba sparked new demands by southerners to annex Texas and expand. (pg. 417) • Northerners begin demanding American sovereignty over ALL of Oregon Territory (54⁰40’) • Northerners want Oregon / Southerners want Texas (President John Tyler) • Van Buren (northern Democrat) and Clay (Whig) persuade the Senate to reject Tyler’s proposed treaty to annex Texas – They are hoping to, once again, avoid the issue of slavery. The issue of expansion is the central issue in this election! . The Democrats nominate James K. Polk – the “dark horse” from Tennessee • Southern expansionist • Slave holder • Known as “Young Hickory” • Campaigned on the promise to take both Oregon and Texas o Rallying cry for taking ALL of Oregon = “Fifty-four forty or fight!” o Idea of jingoism – extreme patriotism/nationalism (pg. 418) . Whigs nominate Henry Clay – supported the American system, tried to dodge the Texas issue, alienated northern Whigs with his eventual support for annexation. Northern Whigs threw their support to Liberty Party candidate James Birney. This also threw the election to Polk! . Polk’s election brings Texas into the Union by joint-resolution (simple majority needed rather than two-thirds for passage of a treaty). America’s History Eighth Edition Terms & Concepts – Unit 7 3. War, Expansion, and Slavery, 1846-1850 o Polk begins advocating for acquisition of California o Democrats and expansionists largely ignore the growing sectional crisis over the expansion of slavery. o War with Mexico, 1846-1848 . Economic and political instability in Mexico since 1821 . Mexico is committed to preserving historic boundaries . Suspends diplomatic relations with the U.S. when the U.S. annexes Texas o Polk’s Expansionist Program . Begins to aggressively encourage independence and then acquisition of California. Captain John C. Frémont dispatched . Polk’s secret initiative • John Slidell to Mexico (secure Rio Grande as Texas boundary and offer to buy California and New Mexico) • Mexico refuses o Move toward war – Texas boundary dispute (Nueces R. or Rio Grande R.) . Gen. Zachary Taylor sent to occupy area between Nueces and Rio Grande – stage set for war. May, 1846 – Polk delivers war message – “…Mexico…has…shed American blood upon American soil.” . Congress votes to go to war, despite objections from northern Whigs (Illinois Representative Abraham Lincoln’s “spot resolution”). June, 1846 – settlement of Oregon Boundary Dispute – Polk wants to avoid war with Britain (agrees to U.S. boundary at the 49th parallel rather than 54⁰40’. o American Military Successes . U.S. established military superiority almost immediately. American’s in California staged a revolt supported by Frémont’s forces. – established the “Bear Flag Republic” . American forces secured control of California in 1847. General Winfield Scott takes Veracruz and Mexico City (September, 1847) – forced Mexico to surrender. o A Divisive Victory . Initially – patriotic expansionism (noble struggle to extent “the principles of free government.”) . War divided the nation. • Conscience Whigs – northern Whigs who opposed the war on moral grounds • Voters repudiate Polk’s war policy in elections of 1846 – Whigs take control of Congress • Emerson and Thoreau oppose the war – Thoreau refuses to pay tax, is jailed, and pens “Civil Disobedience” in response o The Wilmot Proviso . Polk’s policies split the Democrats . David Wilmot from Pennsylvania – proposes the Wilmot Proviso • Wilmot Proviso supports the “free-soil” argument – keep slavery out in order to allow opportunities to small, independent farmers. Do not allow planter aristocracy to take over the West! • Ban on slavery in territories gained from the war (Mexican Cession) • Congress becomes divided along sectional lines! • Wilmot Proviso is defeated in the Senate, but old sectional wounds are reopened. • Democratic expansionists become more threatened and more aggressive in response to the Wilmot Proviso . Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo • Mexican Cession • Mexico gets $15 million o Free Soil . Debate over expansion dominates Election of 1848 . “Slave Power” conspiracy (pg. 421) . Free-soil movement • “Slavery was an institution of “aristocratic men” and a danger to “the great mass of the people… [because it]…threatens the general and equal distribution of our lands into convenient family farms.” ***point this quote out to students! . Free Soil Party organized in 1848 • did not argue for abolition • more focused on stopping the expansion of slavery in order to preserve republican ideals • won broad support from aspiring white farmers • many radical abolitionists (Garrison) criticized Free Soil Party o Election of 1848 . Democratic nominee – Lewis Cass (promoted squatter sovereignty) . Northern Democrats who opposed expansion of slavery joined the Free-Soil Party . Free-Soil Party nominee - Martin Van Buren (former northern Democrat) . Whig nominee – Zachary Taylor (“Old Rough and Ready”) • Louisiana slave holding family – Supported slavery in the South, but NOT in the territories. • Won support in the North • Military heroics also won him support • Taylor wins the election! America’s History Eighth Edition Terms & Concepts – Unit 7 o California Gold and Racial Warfare . Sutter’s Mill, 1848 – beginning of the California Gold Rush . By the end of 1849 more than 80,000 settlers had flooded into California . Rapid population growth forces Congress into immediate decision (and debate) over California statehood. o Forty-Niners . Concerns over lawlessness and instability in California . Entry of Chinese miners in 1850 – Americans called for laws to expel them. Few Forty-Niners struck it rich. o Racial Warfare and Land Rights . Americans begin taking over land claims in California . Defeat of many native tribes in California . Californio loss of land o 1850: Crisis and Compromise . Rapid settlement of California – skip territorial phase and admit to the Union . California state constitution prohibited slavery – President Taylor urged Congress to admit California as a free state . Constitutional Conflict • John C. Calhoun – uphold southern honor and political power (radical view – supported by the Deep South) o Proposed a constitutional amendment to create a dual presidency – dividing North and South o Advanced the argument that because slaves were property, Congress had no authority to regulate slavery in the territories. “Slavery follows the flag” • James Buchanan – moderate, northern Democratic view o Extend the Missouri Compromise Line (36⁰30’) to the Pacific o Guaranteed slave owners access to western territories • Stephen A. Douglas – Democratic senator from Illinois o Popular sovereignty (squatter sovereignty – first advanced by Lewis Cass in 1848) o Leave it up to the settlers in a territory to decide the status of slavery. They will vote on the issue. o Gained a great deal of support. – Remove the explosive issue of slavery from Congress and let the people decide. • William Seward and Salmon Chase – antislavery advocates o Restrict slavery in its existing boundaries o Eventually extinguish it completely o “higher law than the Constitution” – “Higher
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indiana Magazine of History
    INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY - VOLUMEXXXI MARCH, 1935 NUMBER1 The Nomination of the Democratic Candidate in 1924 By SEXSONE. HUMPHREYS One of the strangest among the phenomena of American party history is the Democratic National Convention of 1924, in which all the elements that tend to divide the Democratic party combined to produce a bitterness such as had never been seen in a political convention before and to send the number of ballots required to name a candidate to the record figure of 103. Historians are familiar with the problems that caused the impasse and have frequently analyzed their significance. Students of politics find in the convention a demonstration of how diverse are the interests represented in the Democratic party. There is one question regarding the convention, how- ever, that has largely gone unanswered, and frequently un- asked. That is the question of how it happened that John W. Davis became the nominee of the party. This is an impor- tant question, for it represents the first time since 1860 that the party had gone south of the Mason-Dixon line for its candidate, unless Woodrow Wilson, born in Virginia, but nominated from New Jersey, be considered an exception. The nomination indicates also the triumph of the metropolitan element in the party that was to lead it to defeat in 1928. John W. Davis was the second choice, not of the forces which had kept William G. McAdoo in the lead during most of the convention, but of the forces of A1 Smith-the urban, Catholic, and financial interests in the party.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Polarization at the 1896 Democratic Convention William D
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Scholar Commons - Institutional Repository of the University of South Carolina University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Faculty Publications Communication Department 2001 Bryan’s ‘A Cross of Gold’: The Rhetoric of Polarization at the 1896 Democratic Convention William D. Harpine University of South Carolina - Aiken, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/ aiken_communications_facpub Part of the Communication Commons Publication Info Postprint version. Published in Quarterly Journal of Speech, Volume 87, 2001, pages 291-304. © 2001, Quarterly Journal of Speech, Taylor and Francis Harpine, W. D. (2001). Bryan's “a Cross of Gold:” The rhetoric of polarization at the 1896 democratic convention. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 87(3), 291-304. This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 2001, © Taylor & Francis, available online at:http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00335630109384338 DOI:10.1080/00335630109384338 This Article is brought to you by the Communication Department at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “A Cross of Gold” 1 Bryan‟s “A Cross of Gold:” The Rhetoric of Polarization at the 1896 Democratic Convention His arms spread wide, William Jennings Bryan thundered at the huge, cheering crowd, “You shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold” (Coletta 141; “Bryan‟s Great Speech”). Bryan‟s speech of July 9, 1896, given during the platform debate at the Democratic convention, is one of the most discussed speeches in the history of American public address.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Press
    “ … measuring him by the sentiment of his country, a sentiment he was bound as a statesman to consult, [Lincoln] was swift, zealous, radical, and determined.” — FREDERICK DOUGLASS, APRIL 14, 1876 LINCOLN AT PEORIA The Turning Point by Lewis E. Lehrman Lincoln at Peoria: The Turning Point explains how Lincoln’s speech at Peoria on October 16, 1854 was the turning point in the development of his antislavery campaign and his political career and thought. Here, Lincoln detailed his opposition to slavery’s extension and his determination to defend America’s Founding document from those who denied that the Declaration of Independence applied to black Americans. Students of Abraham Lincoln know the canon of his major speeches — from his Lyceum Speech of 1838 to his “Final Remarks” delivered from a White House window, days before he was murdered in 1865. Less well-known are the two extraordinary speeches given at Springfield and Peoria two weeks apart in 1854. They marked Mr. Lincoln’s reentry into Book Information the politics of Illinois and, as he could not know, his preparation for the U.S. History Hardcover Presidency in 1861. These Lincoln addresses catapulted him into the July 2008 debates over slavery which dominated Illinois and national politics for the $29.95 rest of the decade. Lincoln delivered the substance of these arguments 978-0-8117-0361-1 Published by Stackpole Books several times — certainly in Springfield on October 4, 1854, for which there www.LincolnAtPeoria.com are only press reports. A longer version came twelve days later in Peoria. To understand President Abraham Lincoln, one must understand the Peoria Press Contact speech of October 16, 1854.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Competitive Advantage: How Presidential Candidates and Party Networks Adapt to Times of Social, Economic, and Technological Change"
    "Seeking Competitive Advantage: How Presidential Candidates and Party Networks Adapt To Times of Social, Economic, and Technological Change" Wayne Steger (DePaul University), Andrew Dowdle (University of Arkansas), and Randall Adkins (University of Nebraska at Omaha Abstract: The 1970s are universally recognized as a period of tremendous transition and instability producing nomination campaigns with a momentum-driven system (e.g., Ceaser 1979; 1981; Aldrich 1980; Bartels 1985, 1987). While the 1970s were a transformative era in presidential nomination politics and process, nomination campaigns before and after the McGovern-Fraser Commission show evidence of innovation and adaptation. Innovation and adaptation occur continuously as political actors seek competitive advantage in a changing environment. Innovation and adaptation occurs among candidates seeking advantage in the campaign, among news media seeking audience share, and among the factions of party activists and elites seeking a champion of their causes. Draft: V 1.0 This is an admittedly early version of a big-picture paper, written by committee with too little coordination of busy folks. For a first draft, we believe that it isn’t bad but we apologize in advance if appropriate credit is not given for the ideas and evidence we are building on. Paper prepared for the State of the Parties Conference, Ray Bliss Institute, University of Akron, Oct. 15-16, 2009. Presidential nomination politics continuously evolve though the rate of change varies (e.g., Ceaser 1979; Reiter 1985), with periods of considerable change such as the early 1970s (e.g., Ranney 1975; Shafer 1983) and periods of relative stability such as the 1980s and 1990s (e.g., Barilleaux and Adkins 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Losing and Winning
    Losing and Winning THE CRAFT AND SCIENCE OF POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS 1 There are three people that I want to acknowledge tonight because if it wasn’t for them, we would not be here . whenever the history is written about Alabama politics, remember those names, Giles Perkins,distribute Doug Turner and Joe Trippi. —DEMOCRATIC US SENATOR-ELECTor DOUG JONES CREDITED HIS UPSET VICTORY TO HIS CAMPAIGN MANAGERS IN A NATIONALLY TELEVISED VICTORY SPEECH ON THE EVENING OF DECEMBER 12, 2017.1 post, olitical campaigns are like new restaurants: Most of them will fail. Of the Pmore than 140 campaign managers we interviewed for this book, nearly all had lost elections—and many of them more than once. Even the most experienced and successful campaign manager can lose unexpectedly and even spectacularly. Consider the case of a campaign manager we will call “TW.” For three decades, he managed his candidate—his client and his best friend—rising from the New Yorkcopy, legislature, to the governor’s mansion, and on to the US Senate.2 Along the way, TW had worked for other candidates who were nominated for or won the presidency.3 TW’s skills as a campaign manager had earned him national renown and a very comfortable living. He was the undisputed American political notwizard behind the curtain. Now at the peak of his craft, TW was in Chicago at the Republican Party’s nominating convention. His client of thirty years was the front-runner to win the nomination. TW was so certain of the result that he had sent his candidate out of Do the country on a preconvention tour of European capitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Horse Rejected;
    ’ THE weather ‘borrow. tonight •«<* FtioFa Showers Ba. m.. 71 degree.: - Mature.. The Atlanta Georgian 12 noon. 80 de- ,6*7 m.. 77 degree.: IPITION m.. 82 degrees. gree.: 2 p. Read For Profit —GEORGIAN WANT ADS—Use For Result». 237. ATLANTA, GA.. MONDAY, JUL Y 1, 1912. 2 CENTS EVERYWHERE VOL. X. NO. Testimony of GirL 12, FSHTHtIn I WILL DEFY Wins Divorce for Her DARK HORSE Father in !0 Minutes REJECTED; Sallie Myers Says Strange Man LIGHTPLANT DEATH,SAYS “Came to See Mama When Papa Was Away.’’ WILSON IS NOW IN LEAD Sallie Myers, twelve years old. daugh- TO ter of J. R. Myers, won a divorce suit Stars Contest GRACE, for her her Society Racquet Friends Renew TIES UP BIG father today birthday. Mr. Speakers Determina- Myers was suing Mrs. May White My- for de- tion Stand Him ers complete divorce, charging BUDS IN TENNISTOURNEY to by Uncompromis-V sertion. and the testimony- of the little girl caused a jury in superior court to ingly to the Very End—Minority JAIL WIFE grant the of her father. request GOWtGT Atlanta society folk were attracted As the child took the stand the at- to the Piedmont Driving Club today lo Block Will of torneys the as Majority. -- questioned judge to / watch the play in the finals match to whether or not she should be sworn. Wounded Man Declares That determine tlie best woman player, in Institutions Balk and "Do you know anything about swear- Financial which two of the leading -oviety girls ing to tlie truth, little girl?" Judge Ellis BALTIMORE, July I.—Wyoming switched her 6 votes from Will Go of the younger set.
    [Show full text]
  • News Summaries 7/76
    News Summaries 7/76 Folder Citation: Collection: Records of the 1976 Campaign Committee to Elect Jimmy Carter; Series: Noel Sterrett Subject File; Folder: New Summaries 7/76; Container 90 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Carter-Mondale%20Campaign_1976.pdf Ji1n1ny Cc111e1· Presidential Campaign What The Press Had To,Say. 7/1 thru 7/6 .·.-·J·: ---· -·- ---- ··-·----- ---------.. / WWW 1 MOitNIN ! ' ' ' . rl'lON .··. ~ING '~HE K. 'LAN' 'A (JONS' J . ·6REF:f EDITI mmoN For iOB Year• the South'• Standard Netospaper FIFTF.EN CF.N PrfN m,,,., °' ·' Rrf.111 Tradlnl : 42 PAGES, 4 An.ANTA, GA. 30302, TIJF.SDAY, JULY.&. 1976 sEcnoN~ r.o. BOll 1689 .17 *** ~ .. ~:.:·. ~. '. - ...,,. ... ~ ~-By.ANDREW GLASS · --- ·.;;-~ and DAVID MORRISON . _: . ~;· ~' · Conslltutlon Staff Wrlttr1 ·. l. ~?I:'·:.' .-:~_~it: .:... ... HERSHEY, tPa.-Claiming: , .. thaf'11! · their states are being bled dry, by the:_ · soa~g cost of helping ttie poar, the na- ~:; . ..•. tion's governors appear' ready to take ·;· · ··. the lead in Jos~ing a drastic overhaul ,r ; ·of.welfare. · · ' '~ . , · · ·:··· A resolution calling '.for' Sweeping.!: .: .:welfare reforms received wide: support;"'.: : '.Monday at the first session 't>f the Na- .;." 1 . ~ .,". tional Governor's Conference: ·. · ·. ''.'' '.::.~ .•, '·. Some conservatives around the ~? ·' · · meeting table raised fears that federal-! :;. .. · ization. of welfare · would further in-.. · · , crease Washington's formidable powers) :11 But. the prevailin~ mood here favors a' ·n ., clean s~ as the best means of lifting . .. ; , , the crushing burdens on · taxpayers · in ·: : .supporting welfare clients. · · · ·· · ':' ! . Gov. Brendan Byrne of New Jersey, ; i '.. ·a· liberal Democrat, told the group: "We}'._;·t,1 have known for years that the current' <' :'.patchwork of fedei:al, state a~d "loca(;j:~ welfare programs is not working.· We :..,_:, " have tinkered with these programs in !,'.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction James Polk Is Known As the First Dark Horse Candidate for The
    “The Dark Horse” Introduction James Polk is known as the first dark horse candidate for the US presidency. Though it is a stretch to call a former seven term US congressman, Speaker of the House, and governor unknown, many people were surprised by his nomination. Political campaigns were a lot different when Polk was alive. As a dark horse candidate, James Polk and the Democrats had to come up with a way to beat Henry Clay and the Whigs. In this lesson plan, your students will explore what the presidential campaign of 1844 looked and sounded like through the analysis of primary and secondary sources then plan, develop, and execute their own campaign. Objectives A. Research and analyze primary and secondary sources to explore how political conventions worked in 1844. B. Examine primary source excerpts from newspapers, personal accounts, and political documents to identify differences between the two major political parties during James Polk’s candidacy. C. Analyze political cartoons, ribbons, and songs to understand how political messages were spread during the 1844 campaign. D. Demonstrate understanding of the complex issues facing the United States during the 1844 campaign through the creation of political cartoons, songs, and speeches. TN State Standards 5.4 Identify the impact of important Tennesseans prior to the Civil War, including: President James K. Polk (Manifest Destiny) 8.53 Identify the major events and impact of James K. Polk’s presidency, including the annexation of Texas and the settlement of the Oregon boundary. TN.22 Describe the contributions of President James K. Polk to Tennessee and American history.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CONTENDER a Year Before the Democratic National Convention of 1924 the Contest for the Party's Presidential Nomination
    THE CONTENDER A year before the Democratic National Convention of 1924 the contest for the party’s presidential nomination had become one between William Gibbs McAdoo and Senator Oscar W. Underwood, a wet, conservative Alabamian. A large number of favorite sons and other minor candidates, all hoping for the nomination if the two principals deadlocked, also figured in the preconvention plans of the leaders of the Democratic Party. At the time of the Mullan-Gage episode Al Smith was merely one of these other candidates. A few politicians and other observers had predicted, particularly after Smith’s impressive victory in 1922, that he would be a presidential candidate in 1924, but they had usually considered Smith to be only a minor contender for the nomination. 1 The prominence that Smith received from the Mullan-Gage affair – as well as from his subsequent, somewhat mystifying visit to the Midwest – heightened speculation about his presidential candidacy for a few months and led some of McAdoo’s friends to believe that Smith would soon commence an energetic national campaign for the nomination. Only a few commentators during the last half of 1923, however, ranked Smith among the leading contenders; and when he made no apparent effort to undertake an active campaign, they too began to discount his candidacy. By the end of the year, and even into 1924, nearly every published analysis of the Democratic contest either completely ignored Smith or else mentioned him as an afterthought, and even some of Smith’s most ardent enemies no longer regarded his candidacy as a serious threat.
    [Show full text]
  • JOSEPH C. SIBLEY, DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL by Grover
    JOSEPH C. SIBLEY, DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL ASPIRANT IN 1896* LEWIS W. RATHGEBBR we approach the time for the presidential nominating conven- Astions this year (1952), western Pennsylvanians can look back to an earlier time when some of them were even more directly concerned with such gatherings, especially with the Democratic convention in 1896. It was that convention which set the pattern for the Democratic party in the following years, and which, to a large extent, created the political basis of victory that was to triumph in 1912 and again in 1932. In 1896, the Democratic party repudiated the administration of Grover Cleveland, who had been reflected in 1892. Itturned its back on many of the leaders in the East, the city political machines, and placed the control of the party in the West and South under the leadership of William Jennings Bryan. Pennsylvania was vitally interested in the Democratic convention that year. The chairman of the Democratic national committee, chosen by Grover Cleveland in 1892, was William Harrity of Philadelphia. Besides, Pennsylvania had at least two candidates interested in the nomination. One was ex-Governor Robert Pattison. Pattison had been elected in 1877, at the age of twenty-five, as the city controller of Phila- delphia, and was greatly aided by the reform element of the city. In 1882, he had been elected governor of Pennsylvania, again with the aid of the reform elements. He had been unable to run for reelection in 1886, due to the constitutional provision of Pennsylvania which pro- hibits a governor from succeeding himself. In 1890, he duplicated this feat and was again elected governor, serving until 1895.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryan, Populism and Utah
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1975 Bryan, Populism and Utah Herbert E. Cihak Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Mormon Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Cihak, Herbert E., "Bryan, Populism and Utah" (1975). Theses and Dissertations. 4602. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4602 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. BRYAN POPULISM AND UTAH A thesis presented to the department of political science brigham young university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of arts by herbert E cihak august 1975 this thesis by herbert E cihak is accepted in its present form by the department of political science of brigham young university as satisfying the thesis requirement for the degree of master of arts J heithhelthmelville cammicommiittqf chairman eleeie001 robert H sloverslovercomrikitteecor itteeattee member J ar7r & lateyatete department chairman 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES iv PREFACE v introduction i1 chapter J THE POPULIST REVOLT 5 early farm alliances popuusxnpo jjlbprn f y awn rheaheyhee pepecletpepletoe lesies s party in utah II11 BRYAN FREE SILVER AND SEWALL 15 the silver craze preconventionpre
    [Show full text]
  • Media Representation of Gender: Startup Publications’ Coverage of 2016 Presidential Campaigns
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-2016 Media Representation of Gender: Startup Publications’ Coverage of 2016 Presidential Campaigns Emily Elizabeth Isaacs [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the Film and Media Studies Commons Recommended Citation Isaacs, Emily Elizabeth, "Media Representation of Gender: Startup Publications’ Coverage of 2016 Presidential Campaigns" (2016). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1975 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. !1 Media Representation of Gender: Startup Publications’ Coverage of 2016 Presidential Campaigns Chancellor’s Honors Program Thesis Project University of Tennessee Spring 2016 Emily Isaacs !2 Introduction In an era dominated by technology, people can access information frequently and efficiently. Though content is readily available, accuracy is not guaranteed. The mass media, responsible for distributing most of the population’s news, are often accused of having one viewpoint. Because the images these major corporations produce become commonplace in society, it becomes important that the media produce a variety of content. As the mass media provide information to a diverse nation, the depictions of the population should correspond accordingly.
    [Show full text]