DOCSLIB.ORG

Notices Federal Register Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notices Federal Register Vol 35317 Notices Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 107 Friday, June 2, 2000 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER developing this program, the Secretary diverse groups served by USDA, contains documents other than rules or is required to establish a NOSB. The membership shall include, to the extent proposed rules that are applicable to the purpose of the NOSB is to assist in the practicable, individuals with public. Notices of hearings and investigations, development of a proposed National demonstrated ability to represent committee meetings, agency decisions and List of Approved and Prohibited minorities, women, and persons with rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency Substances and to advise the Secretary disabilities. statements of organization and functions are on other aspects of the National Organic The information collection examples of documents appearing in this program. requirements concerning the section. The current NOSB has made nomination process have been recommendations to the Secretary previously cleared by the Office of regarding the establishment of the initial Management and Budget (OMB) under DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE organic program. It is anticipated that OMB Control No. 0505±0001. the NOSB will continue to make Dated: May 26, 2000. Agricultural Marketing Service recommendations on various matters Sharon Bomer Lauritsen, [TM±00±05] including recommendations on Acting Deputy Administrator, Transportation substances it believes should be and Marketing. Nominations for Members of the permitted to be used or prohibited for [FR Doc. 00±13784 Filed 6±1±00; 8:45 am] National Organic Standards Board use in organic production and handling. BILLING CODE 3410±02±P The NOSB is required to be composed AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, of various individuals including owners USDA. or operators of an organic production DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ACTION: Notice. organization, persons who represent Forest Service SUMMARY: The Organic Foods public interest or consumer interest Production Act (OFPA) of 1990, as groups, and an individual who is a certifying agent. Nominations are sought Management Direction for the John amended, requires the establishment of Muir, Ansel Adams, Dinkey Lakes and a National Organic Standards Board for two positions for organic producer and two positions for consumer/public Monarch Wilderness; Inyo, Sierra and (NOSB). The NOSB is a 15 member Sequoia National Forests board that advises the Secretary on all interest representatives. Additionally, aspects of the National Organic nominations are being sought for the AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. Program, and has responsibility for certifying agent position who will ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare a development of a proposed National represent State and private certifiers. Revised Environmental Impact List of Approved and Prohibited Individuals desiring to be appointed to Statement. Substances. The U.S. Department of the NOSB at this time must be either an Agriculture (USDA) is requesting owner or operator of an organic SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that nominations to fill five upcoming production operation, a person who the USDA, Forest Service will prepare a vacancies on the NOSB. The Secretary represents public or consumer interest revised draft environmental impact of Agriculture will appoint nominees to groups, or a State or private organic statement (EIS) to establish management serve 5-year terms of office scheduled to certifying agent. Selection criteria will direction for the John Muir, Ansel commence in January 2001. USDA include such factors as: demonstrated Adams, Dinkey Lakes and Monarch encourages eligible minorities, women, experience and interest in organics; Wilderness areas. The Sierra and Inyo and persons with disabilities to apply. diverse commodity and geographic National Forests administer the John representation; support of consumer and Muir and Ansel Adams Wildernesses; DATES: Written nominations, with public interest organizations; the Sierra National Forest administers resumes, must be postmarked on or the Dinkey Lakes Wilderness; and the before August 30, 2000. demonstrated experience with environmental matters; and other factors Sierra and Sequois National Forests ADDRESSES: Nominations should be sent as may be appropriate for specific administer the Monarch Wilderness. to Mr. Keith Jones, Program Manager, positions. These Wildernesses are located in National Organic Program, USDA± After applications have been Fresno, Inyo, Madera, and Mono, AMS±TMP±NOP, Room 2510±So., Ag reviewed, individuals receiving California. The decision to revise the Stop 0268, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, nominations will be contacted and draft EIS was based on the high level of D.C. 20090±6456. supplied with biographical forms. The interest and concern apparent from the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. biographical information must be public comments to the original draft. Keith Jones, Telephone: (202) 720±3252; completed and returned to USDA The proposed action has been more Fax: (202) 690±3924; e-mail: within 10 working days of its receipt to clearly defined, otherwise it remains [email protected]. expedite the clearance process that is unchanged from that described in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OFPA required by the Secretary. original NOI published in the August of 1990, as amended (7 U.S.C. Section Equal opportunity practices will be 12, 1992 issue of the Federal Register 6501 et seq.), requires the Secretary to followed in all appointments to the (57 FR 36061). establish an organic certification NOSB in accordance with USDA FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: program for producers and handlers of policies. To ensure that the Direct questions regarding the proposed agricultural products that have been recommendations for the NOSB have action and revised EIS to Mary Beth produced using organic methods. In taken into account the needs of the Hennessy, Wilderness Specialist, Inyo VerDate 11<MAY>2000 13:02 Jun 01, 2000 Jkt 190000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02JNN1.SGM pfrm08 PsN: 02JNN1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • The ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION MAP and Many Other California Trail Maps Are Available from Sunbelt Publications. Please See
    SUNBELT WHOLESALE BOOKS AND MAPS CALIFORNIA TRAIL MAPS www.sunbeltpublications.com ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION MAP 6TH EDITION 3RD EDITION ISBN: 9780899977799 Retail: $21.95 ISBN: 9780899974019 Retail: $9.95 Publisher: WILDERNESS PRESS Publisher: WILDERNESS PRESS AREA: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA The Anza-Borrego and Western Colorado Desert A convenient map to the entire Anza-Borrego Desert Region is a vast, intriguing landscape that harbors a State Park and adjacent areas, including maps for rich variety of desert plants and animals. Prepare for Ocotillo Wells SRVA, Bow Willow Area, and Coyote adventure with this comprehensive guidebooks, Moutnains, it shows roads and hiking trails, diverse providing everything from trail logs and natural history points of interest, and general topography. Trip to a Desert Directory of agencies, accommodations, numbers are keyed to the Anza-Borrego Desert Region and facilities. It is the perfect companion for hikers, guide book by the same authors. campers, off-roaders, mountain bikers, equestrians, history buffs, and casual visitors. The ANZA-BORREGO DESERT REGION MAP and many other California trail maps are available from Sunbelt Publications. Please see the following listing for titles and details. s: catalogs\2018 catalogs\18-CA TRAIL MAPS.doc (800) 626-6579 Fax (619) 258-4916 Page 1 of 7 SUNBELT WHOLESALE BOOKS AND MAPS CALIFORNIA TRAIL MAPS www.sunbeltpublications.com ANGEL ISLAND & ALCATRAZ ISLAND BISHOP PASS TRAIL MAP TRAIL MAP ISBN: 9780991578429 Retail: $10.95 ISBN: 9781877689819 Retail: $4.95 AREA: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AREA: NORTHERN CALIFORNIA An extremely useful map for all outdoor enthusiasts who These two islands, located in San Francisco Bay are want to experience the Bishop Pass in one handy map.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 98-425 An
    PUBLIC LAW 98-425-SEPT. 28, 1984 98 STAT. 1619 Public Law 98-425 98th Congress An Act Sept. 28, 1984 Entitled the "California Wilderness Act of 1984". [H.R. 1437] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this title may California Wilderness Act be cited as the "California Wilderness Act of 1984". of 1984. National TITLE I Wilderness Preservation System. DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS National Forest System. SEC. 101. (a) In furtherance of the purposes of the Wilderness Act, National parks, the following lands, as generally depicted on maps, appropriately monuments, etc. referenced, dated July 1980 (except as otherwise dated) are hereby 16 USC 1131 designated as wilderness, and therefore, as components of the Na­ note. tional Wilderness Preservation System- (1)scertain lands in the Lassen National Forest, California,s which comprise approximately one thousand eight hundred acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled "Caribou Wilder­ ness Additions-Proposed", and which are hereby incorporated in, and which shall be deemed to be a part of the Caribou Wilderness as designated by Public Law 88-577; 16 USC 1131 (2)s certain lands in the Stanislaus and Toiyabe Nationals note. 16 USC 1132 Forests, California, which comprise approximately one hundred note. sixty thousand acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled "Carson-Iceberg Wilderness-Proposed", dated July 1984, and which shall be known as the Carson-Iceberg Wilderness: Pro­ vided, however, That the designation of the Carson-Iceberg Wil­ derness shall not preclude continued motorized access to those previously existing facilities which are directly related to per­ mitted livestock grazing activities in the Wolf Creek Drainage on the Toiyabe National Forest in the same manner and degree in which such access was occurring as of the date of enactment of this title; (3)scertain lands in the Shasta-Trinity National Forest, Cali­ 16 USC 1132 fornia, which comprise approximately seven thousand three note.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Recommendations
    U.S. Forest Service Pacific Southwest Region June 2016 Wilderness Recommendations Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Draft Forest Plans for the Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forests As part of revising the Inyo, Sequoia and Sierra National Forests land management plans (forest plans), the Forest Service is identifying and evaluating lands that may be suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. This is a requirement of the 2012 Planning Rule (36 CFR 219.7(c)(2)(v)). We are not designating any wilderness areas through this process; only Congress can take that action. The wilderness recommendation process has three steps, inventory, evaluation and analysis. This process is documented in Appendix B in the draft environmental impact statement (EIS) for these forest plan revisions. We are following the 2012 Planning Rule Directives, Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 1909.12 Chapter 70, which uses criteria based on the Wilderness Act of 1964. Appendix B describes the outcome of the inventory and evaluation, the areas included in one or more alternative in the draft EIS, and rationale for those areas that were not selected for analysis in the draft EIS. Based on the analysis in the environmental impact statement and public input received, the Forest Supervisor for each of the three national forests will make a decision on specific areas to recommend for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System. The decision will be included in the Record of Decision for the plan as a preliminary administrative recommendation. Forest plan components will provide direction for managing areas recommended for wilderness designation. Wilderness Recommendation Process There are four steps in the wilderness recommendation process: inventory, evaluation, analysis and recommendation.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments on DEIS Volume 2, Appendix C: Wild and Scenic Rivers Evaluation for the Inyo, Sequoia, and Sierra National Forests
    Exhibit VIII.1-1 Comments on DEIS Volume 2, Appendix C: Wild and Scenic Rivers Evaluation for the Inyo, Sequoia, and Sierra National Forests General Comments on Evaluation Process The Forest Service deserves recognition for conducting a comprehensive evaluation of potential Wild & Scenic Rivers (WSRs) in the Forest Plans Revision (FPR) process. We appreciate that the agency incorporated its previously completed inventories, eligibility findings, and suitability recommendations. We also greatly appreciate that the Inyo and Sierra Forests determined additional streams to be eligible. However, we identified a number of problems with Appendix C that require attention – not the least of which is the Sequoia Forest’s dismal (in comparison to the Inyo and Sierra) inventory and evaluation results, which failed to identify any new eligible stream segments. We also appreciated the opportunity to review and comment on the preliminary inventory and evaluation in February 2016. However, we are disappointed to find that few of the points raised in our 26 pages of detailed comments were addressed in Appendix C. So these comments are somewhat duplicative to the ones submitted by CalWild et al dated Feb. 1, 2016, which are hereby incorporate by reference. Be advised that new additional points are included in these comments. WSR Inventory/Evaluation Comments Applicable To All Three Forests Unnamed Streams Not Inventoried (DEIS Vol. 2, App. C, pg. 379) – The inventory process appears to be restricted to rivers and streams named on 7.5-minute USGS quad maps. There is nothing in the Forest Service Handbook (FSH), federal guidelines, or in federal law that limits WSR inventories and evaluations to only named streams.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinkey Lakes Wilderness Commercial Pack Stock Permit Reissuance for the Sierra National Forest and Trail Management Plan Draft E
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 May 25, 2006 Edward C. Cole Forest Supervisor Sierra National Forest 1600 Tollhouse Road Clovis, CA 93611 Subject: Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Commercial Pack Stock Permit Reissuance for the Sierra National Forest and Trail Management Plan for the Dinkey Lakes Wilderness, Fresno, Mariposa, and Madera Counties, CA (CEQ# 20060084) Dear Mr. Cole: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the above document. Our review and comments are pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508), and Section 309 of the Clean Air Act. Our comments are provided in accordance with the EPA-specific extension to the comment deadline date from May 15, 2006 to May 31, 2006 (telephone conversation with between Laura Fujii and Mike LeFevre, Forest Supervisor’s Office, April 6, 2006). Our detailed comments are enclosed. Based on our review, we have rated the proposed Commercial Pack Stock Permit Reissuance and Trail Management Plan for the Dinkey Lakes Wilderness as Environmental Concerns - Insufficient Information (EC-2). A Summary of EPA Rating Definitions is enclosed. The DEIS identifies trail, meadow, and campsite conditions and locations that are contributing sediment and manure to creeks and streams. While we commend the closure of some trails and meadows deemed unsuitable for recurring commercial pack stock use, we are concerned about the potential continued water quality effects of pack stock use on trails, meadows, and campsites with existing resource impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Request Form; Sierra National Forest
    Map Request Form; Sierra National Forest Quantity Map Name Cost U.S. Dollars Ansel Adams Wilderness Trails (USFS) 11.00 Ansel Adams Wilderness (Tom Harrison) 11.00 A Guide to Ansel Adams Wilderness (USFS) 9.75 A Guide to Dinkey Lakes Wilderness (USFS) 8.75 A Guide to Kaiser Wilderness (USFS) 8.75 Dinkey Lakes Wilderness (Tom Harrison) 11.00 Eldorado National Forest (USFS) 10.75 Humbolt-Toiyabe (Bridgeport Ranger District) (USFS) 10.75 Humbolt-Toiyabe (Carson Ranger District) (USFS) 10.75 Inyo National Forest (USFS) 10.75 John Muir Wilderness & Sequoia-Kings Canyon Wilderness (USFS) 20.00 Kaiser Wilderness (Tom Harrison) 11.00 Kings Canyon High Country (Tom Harrison) 11.00 Los Padres National Forest 10.75 (Monterey & Santa Lucia Ranger Districts) (USFS) Los Padres National Forest (USFS) 10.75 (Mt Pinos, Ojai & Santa Barbara Ranger Districts) Mammoth Lakes & Mono Divide (Inyo & Sierra National Forests) 13.00 (National Geographic) Mono Divide High Country Trails (Tom Harrison) 11.00 Mt. Whitney High Country Trails (Tom Harrison) 11.00 Pacific Crest Trail (USFS) 10.75 San Joaquin River Gorge Management Area (BLM) 6.50 Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Park (Tom Harrison) 11.00 Sequoia National Forest (USFS) 10.75 Shaver Lake (Sierra National Forest) (National Geographic) 13.00 Sierra National Forest (USFS) 10.75 Sierra National Forest (Tom Harrison) Rec 13.00 Sierra Nevada (IMUS) 11.00 Stanislaus National Forest (USFS) 10.75 Yosemite High Country (Tom Harrison) 11.00 Yosemite National Park (Tom Harrison) 11.00 Yosemite SE/Ansel Adams Wilderness (National Geographic) 13.00 Total Quantity: Total Enclosed $______ .
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Evaluating Air Pollution Impacts on Class I Wilderness Areas in California
    United States Department of Agriculture Guidelines for Evaluating Air Forest Service Pollution Impacts on Class I Pacific Southwest Research Station General Technical Wilderness Areas in California Report PSW-GTR-136 David L. Peterson Daniel L. Schmoldt Joseph M. Eilers Richard W. Fisher Robert D. Doty Peterson, David L.; Schmoldt, Daniel L.; Eilers, Joseph M.: Fisher, Richard W.; Doty, Robert D. 1992. Guidelines for evaluating air pollution impacts on class I wilderness areas in California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR- 136. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, US. Department of Agriculture; 34 p. The 1977 Clean Air Act legally mandated the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) of air quality related values (AQRVs) on wilderness lands. Federal land managers are assigned the task of protecting these wilderness values. This report contains guidelines for determining the potential effects of incremental increases in air pollutants on natural resources in wilderness areas of the National Forests of California. These guidelines are based on current information about the effects of ozone, sulfur, and nitrogen on AQRVs. Knowledge-based methods were used to elicit these guidelines from scientists and resource managers in a workshop setting. Linkages were made between air pollutant deposition and level of deterioration of specific features (sensitive receptors) of AQRVs known to be sensitive to pollutants. Terrestrial AQRVs include a wide number of ecosystem types as well as geological and cultural values. Ozone is already high enough to injure conifers in large areas of California and is a major threat to terrestrial AQRVs. Aquatic AQRVs include lakes and streams, mostly in high elevation locations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 D7 Zone Hunt Info
    CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Wildlife Branch 1010 Riverside Parkway, West Sacramento, CA 95605 ZONE D7 2021 General Deer Hunting Information (No Additional Hunts Scheduled) GENERAL INFORMATION This information sheet has been prepared to assist deer hunters applying for, or planning to hunt in, Zone D-7 located in portions of Fresno, Madera, Mariposa, and Tulare counties. The following information should be useful to hunters for archery and general seasons, as well as any “additional hunts” within this geographic area. For more specific information or additional questions regarding this area, contact the following Department office(s): • Central Region Office (Region 4), 1234 E. Shaw Avenue, Fresno, CA 93710 (559-243-4005 ext. 151) encompassing Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Stanislaus, Tulare and Tuolumne counties. REGULATIONS Laws and regulations are designed to conserve wildlife and to provide for an equitable distribution of game mammals. All hunters should read and be familiar with the Current Hunting Regulations. Remember, if you are hunting on private property you must obtain, and have in your possession, written permission to hunt on private property. Hunter trespass laws are strictly enforced. NON-LEAD RESTRICTIONS As of July 1, 2019, all hunters must use nonlead ammunition when taking any wildlife in California, except when hunting with a pellet rifle for approved species. • CCR T14 250.1(d)(3) Effective July 1, 2019, it shall be unlawful to use, or possess with any firearm capable of firing, any projectile(s) not certified as nonlead when taking any wildlife for any purpose in this state.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX F Department of Transportation Section 4(F) Resources
    APPENDIX F Department of Transportation Section 4(f) Resources This appendix contains a general description of parks, recreation areas, and wildlife and waterfowl refuges with quiet setting attributes within the Supplemental Noise Study Area (SNSA); representative Section 4(f) resource locations within these areas; and a summary of the consultation that has occurred with the resource managing agencies. Figure 4-4 in the EIS depicts the location of the park resources described in this appendix. W:\12006395_Mammoth\EIS\Appendices\Working Files\!! Appendix Intros.doc\11/2/2007 APPENDIX F DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SECTION 4(f) RESOURCES This appendix describes the consultation that has occurred with the managing agencies of park resources within the within the Supplemental Noise Study Area (SNSA). In addition, a brief description of each park resource is provided and representative Section 4(f) resource locations with quiet setting attributes are identified within the park resources. Figure 4-4 in the EIS depicts the location of the park resources described in this appendix. The representative Section 4(f) locations that have been identified within the SNSA were subject to the analysis within the EIS that utilizes the Guidance on Procedures for Evaluating the Potential Noise Impacts of Airport Improvement Projects on National Parks and Other Sensitive Park Environments (FAA, 2007). The FAA’s Guidance Document only applies to Section 4(f) resources where a quiet setting is a generally recognized purpose and attribute. Therefore, this appendix notes the representative Section 4(f) locations with quiet setting attributes within each park resource that were included in Sections 4.5 and 5.5 of the EIS.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill to Designate Certain Public Lands in the State of California As Wilderness, and for Other Purposes
    98 S.5 Title: A bill to designate certain public lands in the State of California as wilderness, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Sen Cranston, Alan [CA] (introduced 1/26/1983) Cosponsors (None) Latest Major Action: 4/23/1984 Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee on Energy and Natural Resources received executive comment from Agriculture Department. Unfavorable. SUMMARY AS OF: 1/26/1983--Introduced. California Wilderness Act of 1983 - Designates as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System the following lands in the State of California: (1) the Boundary Peak Wilderness in the Inyo National Forest; (2) the Caliente Wilderness in the Cleveland National Forest; (3) the Caples Creek Wilderness in the Eldorado National Forest; (4) the Caribou Wilderness Additions in the Lassen National Forest; (5) the Carson-Iceberg Wilderness in the Stanislaus and Toiyabe National Forests; (6) the Castle Crags Wilderness in the Shasta Trinity National Forest; (7) the Chancelulla Wilderness in the Shasta Trinity National Forest; (8) the Cinder Buttes Wilderness in the Lassen National Forest; (9) the Cucamonga Wilderness Additions in the Angeles National Forest; (10) the Deep Wells Wilderness in the Inyo National Forest; (11) the Dick Smith Wilderness in the Los Padres National Forest; (12) the Dinkey Lakes Wilderness in the Sierra National Forest; (13) the Domeland Wilderness Additions in the Sequoia National Forest; (14) the Emigrant Wilderness Additions in the Stanislaus National Forest; (15) the Excelsior Wilderness in
    [Show full text]