Resex Rio Preto-Jacundá Redd+ Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Resex Rio Preto-Jacundá Redd+ Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION VCS Version 3, CCB Standards Third Edition RESEX RIO PRETO-JACUNDÁ REDD+ PROJECT Document Prepared by Biofílica Investimentos Ambientais SA Project Title: Resex Rio Preto-Jacundá REDD+ Project Version v. 2.2 Date of issue May 15th 2016 Prepared By Biofílica Investimentos Ambientais S.A. Contact Plínio Ribeiro – CEO – [email protected] Thaís Hiramoto – Project Coordinator – [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION VCS Version 3, CCB Standards Third Edition Project Title Resex Rio Preto-Jacundá REDD+ Project Brazil, Estate of Rondônia, Municipality of Machadinho d’Oeste and Project Location Cujubim Biofílica Investimentos Ambientais (primary project proponent): Plínio Ribeiro, plinio@biofílica.com.br, +55 11 3073-0430 Associação dos Moradores de Reserva Extrativista Rio Preto- Jacundá Project Proponents e Ribeirinhos do Rio Machado – Asmorex: José Pinheiro Borges, [email protected], +55 69 3581-2084 Rainforest Alliance: Lawson Henderson, [email protected], +1 (202) 903-0717 Auditor IMAFLORA – Instituto de Manejo e Certificação Florestal e Agrícola: Bruno Brazil de Souza, [email protected], +55 19 3429-0848 Project Start Date October 1st, 2012 Project Lifetime 30 years GHG Accounting Period From 1 October2012 to 30September 2042 Full validation or gap Full Validation validation History of CCB Status Validation initiated in October 19th, 2015 CCBA. 2013. Climate, Community & Biodiversity Standards Third Edition. Edition of CCB Standards CCBA, Arlington, VA, USA. December, 2013. At: www.climate standards.org. Expected Climate Benefits: It is expected a total of 12,428,713 tCO2eq avoided emissions by the Project, opposing a baseline scenario of 14,727,148 tCO2eq emitted under an unplanned deforestation context. In the Project scenario, deforestation of 35,398 hectares is avoided and 414,290 tCO2eq are reduced yearly over a 30-year period. Expected Benefits to the Community: Promoting the welfare of the 130 residents of Resex and enhancement of extractive way of life through activities developed and promoted by REDD +, some of them: Brief Description of the Expected Benefits for Climate, Community and Social organization: Biodiversity monthly workshops with the board of Asmorex related to management and finance; Structuring of internal committees formed by residents in the following subjects: health and education, infrastructure and land tenure security. Health: Training of at least one health worker per community; Providing courses on hygiene, health and family planning for at least 20 families; Income generation: Installation of a processing center for açaí and bazillian nut; v3.0 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION VCS Version 3, CCB Standards Third Edition Education: implementation and maintenance of an educational center for youth and adults; Facilitating access to distance learning courses for residents of three communities present in Resex. Infrastructure: Improvement of sanitary conditions in houses of families living in Resex; future implementation of 3 new communities, seating about 12 families. Empowerment of young people and women: Promotion of workshops on empowerment and leadership focus on the most vulnerable of public at Resex. Environment workshops and quarterly training for interested residents on the following topics: agroecology, waste disposal and composting Expected Biodiversity Benefits: Maintenance of forest cover in the Project Area ensures the protection of habitats, provision of natural resources and ecosystem services, enabling the continued provision of timber and non-timber forest products and favoring socio-economic stability in the region. The area is categorized as of “Very High” priority for conservation, as it contains several species in some degree of threat (according to IUCN) and for being located in the Endemism Center of Rondônia, one of the most important areas of bird endemism in South America. There are 16 species of flora with some degree of threat and restricted use, and 14 species of fauna, especially the bird Rhegmatorhina hoffmannsi (endemic of Rondonia) and the primate Ateles chamek which is Endangered. The project meets the criteria: GL2. Exceptional benefits for communities. The project is Community-led and implemented on a specific Brazilian category of Protected Area of which traditional communities own the rights of managing its resources. The project will generate short-term and long- Attendance to Gold Level term net positive well-being for community members and empowerment of Criteria community members. GL3. Exceptional benefits for Biodiversity. The Project zone includes a site of high conservation priority. It meets the vulnerability criteria, due to regular occurrence of threatened species, such as the Endangered (EN) Black-faced Black Spider Monkey (Ateles chamek), according to IUCN Red List. Date and Version of PDD May 15th 2016, version 2.2 First Verification on CCBS two years after Validation and verification Expected Verification consequently every two years during the Project life-cycle. Schedule VCS verification is expected to occur on every two years. v3.0 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION VCS Version 3, CCB Standards Third Edition “ARTE MATUTA” por Patativa do Assaré Eu nasci ouvindo os cantos das aves de minha serra e vendo os belos encantos que a mata bonita encerra foi ali que eu fui crescendo fui vendo e fui aprendendo no livro da natureza onde Deus é mais visível o coração mais sensível e a vida tem mais pureza. Sem poder fazer escolhas de livro artificial estudei nas lindas folhas do meu livro natural e, assim, longe da cidade lendo nessa faculdade que tem todos os sinais com esses estudos meus aprendi amar a Deus na vida dos animais. Quando canta o sabiá Sem nunca ter tido estudo eu vejo que Deus está por dentro daquilo tudo aquele pássaro amado no seu gorgeio sagrado nunca uma nota falhou na sua canção amena só canta o que Deus ordena só diz o que Deus mandou. v3.0 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION VCS Version 3, CCB Standards Third Edition ÍNDEX 1 GENERAL .......................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1. Summary Description of the Project ........................................................................................... 10 1.2. Project Location .......................................................................................................................... 11 1.3. Conditions Prior to Project Initiation ............................................................................................ 12 1.4. Project Proponent ....................................................................................................................... 22 1.5. Other entities involved in the project ........................................................................................... 24 1.6. Project Management and Governance ....................................................................................... 26 1.7. Project Starting Date ................................................................................................................... 28 1.8. Project Crediting Period .............................................................................................................. 28 2 Design ................................................................................................................................................ 29 2.1. Sectorial Scope and Project Type ............................................................................................... 29 2.2. Description of the Project Activity................................................................................................ 29 2.3. Management of Risk to Project Benefits ..................................................................................... 50 2.4. Project Financing ........................................................................................................................ 52 2.5. Employment Opportunities and Worker Safety ........................................................................... 53 2.6. Stakeholders ............................................................................................................................... 57 2.7. Commercially Sensitive Information ............................................................................................ 68 3 Legal Status ........................................................................................................................................ 69 3.1. Compliance with Laws, Statutes, Property Rights and Other Regulatory Frameworks.............. 69 3.2. Evidence of Right of Use ............................................................................................................. 72 3.3. Emissions Trading Programs and Other Binding Limits ............................................................. 78 3.4. Participation under Other GHG Programs .................................................................................. 78 3.5. Other Forms of Environmental Credit ......................................................................................... 78 3.6. Projects Rejected by Other GHG Programs ............................................................................... 78 3.7. Respect for Rights and no Involuntary Relocation ...................................................................... 78 3.8. Illegal Activities and Project Benefits .........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Ethnobotany of Riverine Populations from the Rio Negro, Amazonia (Brazil)
    Journal of Ethnobiology 27(1): 46–72 Spring/Summer 2007 ETHNOBOTANY OF RIVERINE POPULATIONS FROM THE RIO NEGRO, AMAZONIA (BRAZIL) ANDRE´ A LEME SILVA,a JORGE TAMASHIROb and ALPINA BEGOSSIc aDepartamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biocieˆncias Universidade de Sa˜o Paulo, Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil, CEP 05580-900 ^[email protected]& bDepartamento de Botaˆnica, UNICAMP Campinas, Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil ^[email protected]& cFisheries and Food Institute, Rua Coronel Quirino 1636, Campinas, Sa˜o Paulo 13025-002, Brazil, and Fisheries Management and Training Program, PREAC-UNICAMP ^[email protected]& ABSTRACT.—This paper presents a comparative study of plant knowledge and use in rural and urban areas in the municipality of Barcelos in the Rio Negro, Amazonas, Brazil, based on a total of 81 interviews. Using diversity indices (Shannon-Wiener), plant knowledge is compared among communities (urban- rural population), and between sex (male-female) and age (older or younger than 40 years) categories within each community. Among our informants, we found quantitative differences concerning the knowledge of medicinal plants between sex and age categories. Some individuals play a key role relating to medicinal plant knowledge, and steps should be taken in order to include them in management and conservation plans. Key words: ethnobotany, diversity indices, plant knowledge and use, Rio Negro, Brazilian Amazon. RESUMO.—Com base em um total de 81 entrevistas, no´s apresentamos um estudo etnobotaˆnico comparativo entre populac¸o˜es urbanas e rurais na municipalidade de Barcelos no Rio Negro, Amazonas, Brasil. Usando´ ındices de diversidade (Shannon-Wiener), o conhecimento de plantas e´ comparado entre as comunidades estudadas (populac¸a˜o urbana e rural), geˆnero (masculino e feminino) e categorias de idade (menos que 40 anos e mais que 40 anos de idade).
    [Show full text]
  • Plants and Gall Hosts of the Tirimbina Biological Reserve
    DOI 10.15517/RBT.V67I2SUPL.37233 Artículo Plants and gall hosts of the Tirimbina Biological Reserve, Sarapiqui, Costa Rica: Combining field sampling with herbarium records Plantas y hospederos de agallas de la Reserva Biológica Tirimbina, Sarapiquí, Costa Rica: combinando muestras del campo con registros del herbario Juan Manuel Ley-López1 José González2 Paul E. Hanson3* 1 Departamento Académico, Reserva Biológica Tirimbina. Sarapiquí, Heredia, Costa Rica; [email protected] 2 Independent consultant, Costa Rica; [email protected] 3 Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica; San Pedro, 11501-2060 San José, Costa Rica; [email protected] * Correspondence Received 03-X-2018 Corrected 10-I-2018 Accepted 24-I-2019 Abstract There has been an increasing number of inventories of gall-inducing arthropods in the Neotropics. Nonetheless, very few inventories have been carried out in areas where the flora is well documented, and records of galls from herbaria and sites outside the study area have seldom been utilized. In this study we provide a checklist of the native vascular plants of a 345 ha forest reserve in the Caribbean lowlands of Costa Rica and document which of these plants were found to harbor galls. The gall surveys were carried out between November 2013 and December 2016. We also cross-checked our plant list with the previous gall records from elsewhere in the country and searched for galls on herbarium specimens of dicots reported from the reserve. In total, we recorded 143 families and 1174 plant species, of which 401 were hosts of galls. Plant hosts of galls were found in the following non-mutually exclusive categories: 209 in our field sampling, 257 from previous records, and 158 in herbarium specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • TRITERPENES from Minquartia Guianensis (Olacaceae) and in VITRO ANTIMALARIAL ACTIVITY
    Quim. Nova, Vol. 35, No. 11, 2165-2168, 2012 TRITERPENES FROM Minquartia guianensis (Olacaceae) AND IN VITRO ANTIMALARIAL ACTIVITY# Lorena Mayara de Carvalho Cursino e Cecilia Veronica Nunez* Laboratório de Bioprospecção e Biotecnologia, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Av. André Araujo, 2936, 69060-001 Manaus – AM, Brasil Renata Cristina de Paula e Maria Fernanda Alves do Nascimento Departamento de Produtos Farmacêuticos, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antonio Artigo Carlos, 6627, 31270-901 Belo Horizonte – MG, Brasil Pierre Alexandre dos Santos Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Rua Alexandre Amorim, 330, 69010-300 Manaus – AM, Brasil Recebido em 24/5/12; aceito em 21/9/12; publicado na web em 9/11/12 Minquartia guianensis, popularly known as acariquara, was phytochemically investigated. The following triterpenes were isolated from the dichloromethane extract of leaves: lupen-3-one (1), taraxer-3-one (2) and oleanolic acid (3). The dichloromethane extract of branches yielded the triterpene 3β-methoxy-lup-20(29)-ene (4). The chemical structures were characterized by NMR data. Plant extracts, substance 3, squalene (5) and taraxerol (6), (5 and 6 previously isolated), were evaluated by in vitro assay against chloroquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum. The dichloromethane extract of leaves and the three triterpenes assayed have shown partial activity. Thus, these results demonstrated that new potential antimalarial natural products can be found even
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname
    Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen 67 CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed RAP (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Bulletin of Biological Assessment 67 Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION The RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment is published by: Conservation International 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500 Arlington, VA USA 22202 Tel : +1 703-341-2400 www.conservation.org Cover photos: The RAP team surveyed the Grensgebergte Mountains and Upper Palumeu Watershed, as well as the Middle Palumeu River and Kasikasima Mountains visible here. Freshwater resources originating here are vital for all of Suriname. (T. Larsen) Glass frogs (Hyalinobatrachium cf. taylori) lay their
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Angiosperm Pollen. 5. Early Diverging Superasteridae
    Evolution of Angiosperm Pollen. 5. Early Diverging Superasteridae (Berberidopsidales, Caryophyllales, Cornales, Ericales, and Santalales) Plus Dilleniales Author(s): Ying Yu, Alexandra H. Wortley, Lu Lu, De-Zhu Li, Hong Wang and Stephen Blackmore Source: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 103(1):106-161. Published By: Missouri Botanical Garden https://doi.org/10.3417/2017017 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3417/2017017 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/ page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non- commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. EVOLUTION OF ANGIOSPERM Ying Yu,2 Alexandra H. Wortley,3 Lu Lu,2,4 POLLEN. 5. EARLY DIVERGING De-Zhu Li,2,4* Hong Wang,2,4* and SUPERASTERIDAE Stephen Blackmore3 (BERBERIDOPSIDALES, CARYOPHYLLALES, CORNALES, ERICALES, AND SANTALALES) PLUS DILLENIALES1 ABSTRACT This study, the fifth in a series investigating palynological characters in angiosperms, aims to explore the distribution of states for 19 pollen characters on five early diverging orders of Superasteridae (Berberidopsidales, Caryophyllales, Cornales, Ericales, and Santalales) plus Dilleniales.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Comparison of Local Habitat Niches of Tropical Trees
    Oecologia (2013) 173:1491–1498 DOI 10.1007/s00442-013-2709-5 COMMUNITY ECOLOGY - ORIGINAL RESEARCH A taxonomic comparison of local habitat niches of tropical trees Claire A. Baldeck · Steven W. Kembel · Kyle E. Harms · Joseph B. Yavitt · Robert John · Benjamin L. Turner · George B. Chuyong · David Kenfack · Duncan W. Thomas · Sumedha Madawala · Nimal Gunatilleke · Savitri Gunatilleke · Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin · Somboon Kiratiprayoon · Adzmi Yaacob · Mohd. N. Nur Supardi · Renato Valencia · Hugo Navarrete · Stuart J. Davies · Stephen P. Hubbell · James W. Dalling Received: 2 March 2012 / Accepted: 6 June 2013 / Published online: 13 July 2013 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract The integration of ecology and evolution- forest dynamics plots. Niche overlap values, indicating the ary biology requires an understanding of the evolutionary similarity of two species’ distributions along soil or topo- lability in species’ ecological niches. For tropical trees, graphic axes, were calculated for all pairwise combinations specialization for particular soil resource and topographic of co-occurring tree species at each study site. Congeneric conditions is an important part of the habitat niche, influ- species pairs often showed greater niche overlap (i.e., more encing the distributions of individual species and overall similar niches) than non-congeneric pairs along both soil tree community structure at the local scale. However, little and topographic axes, though significant effects were found is known about how these habitat niches are related to the for only five sites based on Mantel tests. No evidence for evolutionary history of species. We assessed the relation- taxonomic effects was found at the family level. Our results ship between taxonomic rank and tree species’ soil resource indicate that local habitat niches of trees exhibit varying and topographic niches in eight large (24–50 ha) tropical degrees of phylogenetic signal at different sites, which may have important ramifications for the phylogenetic structure Communicated by Walt Carson.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Kwamalasamutu Region, Suriname August-September 2010 Preliminary Report
    A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Kwamalasamutu Region, Suriname August-September 2010 Preliminary Report A collaboration of: Conservation International – Suriname, Rapid Assessment Program (RAP), Center for Environmental Leadership in Business (CELB), Alcoa Foundation Preliminary report produced and distributed January 24, 2011 by Conservation International all photos ©Piotr Naskrecki 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments……………………………………………………… 4 Participants and Authors…………………………………………….… 5 Map………………………………………………………………….…... 9 Introduction to the RAP Survey………………………………….….… 10 Description of RAP Survey Sites………………………………….….... 11 Summary of Preliminary Results by Taxonomic Group…………… 12 Summary of Preliminary Conservation Recommendations……….. 16 Preliminary Reports Water Quality…………………………………………………………… 20 Plants…………………….…….………………………………………… 22 Aquatic Beetles…………………………………………………………. 28 Dung Beetles……………………………………………………………. 31 Ants……………………………………………………………………… 36 Katydids ……………………………………………………................... 38 Dragonflies and Damselflies……………………………….…………… 43 Fishes……………………………………………………………………. 47 Reptiles and Amphibians…………………………………..................... 50 Birds........…………………………………………………….................. 51 Small Mammals………………………………………………………… 56 Large Mammals………………………………………………………… 59 Appendices: Preliminary Data and Species Lists Appendix 1. Water Quality Data………………………………................... 64 Appendix 2. Plants………………………………………………………….. 67 Appendix 3. Aquatic Beetles……………………………………………….. 70 Appendix 4. Dung Beetles………………………………………………….. 72
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Management of Tropical Rainforests the CELOS Management System
    Sustainable Management of Tropical Rainforests The CELOS Management System Marinus J.A. Werger (ed.) Tropenbos Series 25 Sustainable Management of Tropical Rainforests The CELOS Management System Edited by Marinus J.A. Werger Tropenbos Series 25 Paramaribo, Suriname 2011 This book is based on the initiatives of Frits (G.M.J.) Mohren, Contents Rick O. van Ravenswaay, and Rudi F. van Kanten Preface iii This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of WWF-Guianas, the Authors and affiliations viii Capacity Fund for Forests and Nature, the Royal Netherlands Embassy and the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. WUR and other institutes have contributed in-kind by making Part I: The CELOS Management System as an option for sustainable forest their valuable personnel time available. management in Suriname The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily 1 Introduction 3 reflect the view of Tropenbos International. G.M.J. Mohren & R.F. van Kanten Published by: Tropenbos International, Paramaribo, Suriname 2 History of use and management of forests in Suriname 9 J. Hendrison & N.R. de Graaf Copyright: © 2011 Tropenbos International, Paramaribo, Suriname 3 The CELOS Management System: concept, treatments and costs 29 Texts may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes, citing W.B.J. Jonkers & J. Hendrison the source. 4 Tree growth, recruitment and mortality after logging and refinement 46 Citation: Werger, Marinus J.A. (ed.). (2011). Sustainable Management of W.B.J. Jonkers Tropical Rainforests: the CELOS Management System. Tropenbos 5. Impacts on forest structure and plant species diversity 74 International, Paramaribo, Suriname.
    [Show full text]
  • Huacapu-Tech-Report.Pdf
    Technical Data Report for Huacapu (Minquartia guianensis) © Copyrighted 2006. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission. This document is not intended to provide medical advice and is sold with the understanding that the publisher and the author are not liable for the misconception or misuse of information provided. The author shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss, damage, or injury caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the information contained in this document or the use of any plants mentioned. Readers should not use any of the products discussed in this document without the advice of a medical professional. © Copyrighted 2006 by Dr. Leslie Taylor, ND., 3579 Hwy 50 East, Suite 222, Carson City, NV 89701. All rights reserved. Huacapu Family: Olacaceae Taxon: Minquartia guianensis Aubl. Synonyms: Minquartia punctata, Minquartia macrophylla, Minquartia parifolia, Eganthus poeppigii, Endusa punctata, Secretania loranthacea Common names: acaiguara, acapu, acapú, acariguara, acarioba, acary, ahumado, aracuiba, aralta, arekuma, arratt, arratta, black manwood, black manu, bois agouti, caricuara negra, criollo, cuyubi, eur-a-grai, fierro caspi, guacuri de cangrejo, guayacan nego, guayacan pechiche, huacapo, huacapu, huacapú amarillo, huacapú negro, huacapú, ironwood,
    [Show full text]
  • Resex Rio Preto-Jacundá Redd+ Project
    Project Summary CCB Third Edition RESEX RIO PRETO-JACUNDÁ REDD+ PROJECT PROJECT SUMMARY Document prepared by Biofílica Investimentos Ambientais [email protected] +55 (11) 3073-0430 April 7th, 2016 1 Project Summary CCB Third Edition Project Title Resex Rio Preto-Jacundá REDD+ Project Brazil, Estate of Rondônia, Municipality of Machadinho d’Oeste and Project Location Cujubim Associação dos Moradores de Reserva Extrativista Rio Preto Jacundá e Ribeirinhos do Rio Machado – Asmorex: José Pinheiro Project Proponents Borges, [email protected], +55 69 3581-2084 Biofílica Investimentos Ambientais (primary project proponent): Plínio Ribeiro, plinio@biofílica.com.br, +55 11 3073-0430 Rainforest Alliance: Campbell Moore, [email protected], +1 (202) 903-0717 Auditor IMAFLORA – Instituto de Manejo e Certificação Florestal e Agrícola: Bruno Brazil de Souza, [email protected], +55 (19) 3429-0848 Project Start Date October 1st of 2012 Duration of the Project 30 years GHG Accounting Period From October 1st, 2012 to October 1st 2042 Full Validation or Gap Full Validation Validation History of CCB Status Validation initiated in October 19th, 2015 CCBA. 2013. Climate, Community & Biodiversity Standards Third Edition. Edition of CCB Standards CCBA, Arlington, VA, USA. December, 2013. At: www.climate standards.org. Benefits Expected for Climate: It is expected a total of 11,921,458 tCO2eq of emissions avoided by the Project, opposing a baseline scenario of 14,128,224 tCO2eq that would be emitted under an unplanned deforestation context. In the Project scenario, deforestation of 35,222 hectares is avoided and 397,382 tCO2eq are reduced yearly over a 30-year period. Benefits Expected for the Community: Promotion of social welfare and rescue of extractive culture through activities promoted by the Project within the following themes: Social Organization; Health; Brief Description of the Income Generation; Expected Benefits for Education; Climate, Community and Infrastructure; Biodiversity Empowerment of young people and women; Environment.
    [Show full text]
  • English Contents
    ENGLISH CONTENTS (for Color Plates, see pages 27–50) Participants ............................................................................ 174 Apéndices/Appendices (1) Geological Formations ....................................................... 296 Institutional Profiles ............................................................... 178 (2) Water Samples ................................................................... 300 Acknowledgments ................................................................... 182 (3) Vascular Plants .................................................................. 304 Mission and Approach ............................................................ 186 (4) Fish Sampling Stations ....................................................... 330 (5) Fishes ................................................................................ 332 Report at a Glance .................................................................. 187 (6) Amphibians and Reptiles ................................................... 346 Why Ere-Campuya-Algodón?.................................................... 198 (7) Birds ................................................................................. 362 Conservation Targets .............................................................. 199 (8) Large and Medium-sized Mammals ................................... 374 Assets and Opportunities ........................................................ 202 (9) Commonly Used Plants .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeography and Ecology in a Pantropical Family, the Meliaceae
    Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore 71(Suppl. 2):335-461. 2019 335 doi: 10.26492/gbs71(suppl. 2).2019-22 Biogeography and ecology in a pantropical family, the Meliaceae M. Heads Buffalo Museum of Science, 1020 Humboldt Parkway, Buffalo, NY 14211-1293, USA. [email protected] ABSTRACT. This paper reviews the biogeography and ecology of the family Meliaceae and maps many of the clades. Recently published molecular phylogenies are used as a framework to interpret distributional and ecological data. The sections on distribution concentrate on allopatry, on areas of overlap among clades, and on centres of diversity. The sections on ecology focus on populations of the family that are not in typical, dry-ground, lowland rain forest, for example, in and around mangrove forest, in peat swamp and other kinds of freshwater swamp forest, on limestone, and in open vegetation such as savanna woodland. Information on the altitudinal range of the genera is presented, and brief notes on architecture are also given. The paper considers the relationship between the distribution and ecology of the taxa, and the interpretation of the fossil record of the family, along with its significance for biogeographic studies. Finally, the paper discusses whether the evolution of Meliaceae can be attributed to ‘radiations’ from restricted centres of origin into new morphological, geographical and ecological space, or whether it is better explained by phases of vicariance in widespread ancestors, alternating with phases of range expansion. Keywords. Altitude, limestone, mangrove, rain forest, savanna, swamp forest, tropics, vicariance Introduction The family Meliaceae is well known for its high-quality timbers, especially mahogany (Swietenia Jacq.).
    [Show full text]