DOCSLIB.ORG

Green Infrastructure and Ecological Networks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Green Infrastructure and Ecological Networks Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Green Infrastructure and Ecological Networks Main Report March 2018 Green Infrastructure and Ecological Networks – March 2018 CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction – Purpose of Report 1 2. Context 1 3. What is Green Infrastructure? 2 4. What are Ecological Networks? 3 5. Why do we need a Green Infrastructure network? 3 6. Methodology & Analysis 5 7. Conclusion 14 Green Infrastructure and Ecological Network Diagram 15 Green Infrastructure and Ecological Networks – March 2018 1. Introduction – Purpose of Report 1.1 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that: Local planning authorities should set out a strategic approach in their Local Plans, planning positively for the creation, protection, enhancement and management of networks of biodiversity and green infrastructure; 1.2 This report identifies the key green infrastructure and ecological assets found within the Borough of Tonbridge and Malling. It also seeks to identify opportunities to enhance this network, and consider how these networks can link to assets within neighbouring districts, thereby helping plan for biodiversity at a landscape scale as set out in Para. 117 of the NPPF. This report seeks to update the previous Green Infrastructure Report (March 2009) to reflect changes in national planning policy and the updated evidence. 2. Context 2.1 The Borough of Tonbridge and Malling is located in West Kent mostly within the outer part of the Metropolitan Green Belt. Much of the north of the Borough is encompassed by the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), and a smaller area to the south of Tonbridge lies within the High Weald AONB. Immediately to the east lies Maidstone. Sevenoaks is located some 10km to the west with Tunbridge Wells to the south close Tonbridge. 2.2 Most of the Borough is rural in character, with villages and small towns of varying size and character. It stretches north, beyond the M2 motorway, encompassing Blue Bell Hill village and parts of Rochester Airfield and Walderslade on top of the North Downs, and south to the market town of Tonbridge. 2.3 The geography, landscape and biodiversity of the Borough is dictated by the underlying geology with alternating bands of hard and soft rock leading to a strong east-west grain to the landscape. This geological sequence is important in determining the character of the landscape and the historic nature of land use, with predominantly agricultural uses on the low-lying areas historically including orchards and hop growing, and more recently intensive soft fruit farming. Natural England has identified four National Character Areas1 within the Borough. On the upland areas woodland dominates. Some of these areas of woodland in the north of the Borough have been identified as being of international importance for nature conservation. The underlying geology has also resulted in extensive areas of quarrying, some still active, but with some land despoiled by former quarrying activity. 1 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-character-area-profiles-data-for-local- decision-making/national-character-area-profiles#ncas-in-south-east-england-and-london 1 Green Infrastructure and Ecological Networks – March 2018 2.4 The River Medway, the River Bourne and their tributaries pass through the Borough and have significantly influenced the history and development of the area. An extensive area of the Borough lies in the floodplain of the River Medway, the potential impact of which in Tonbridge is reduced to some extent by the Leigh Flood Storage Area immediately west of the town. Much of the floodplain is also of significance for biodiversity with extensive areas of the lower Medway Valley being designated as Sites of Special Scientific Interest. 2.5 The Borough also supports a range of habitats, including some priority areas, which in turn, support a wide range of flora and fauna including both protected and priority species. The diversity of the natural and cultural environment within Tonbridge and Malling is one of the Borough’s great assets and many of the existing landscapes and spaces are accessible to the public. But, as the resident population of the Borough grows, access to the existing areas and provision of new ones will need to be managed to ensure high quality, distinct urban and rural landscapes, accessible diverse open spaces and ecological networks that will allow species to move across the landscape. Together, these assets and their different functions make up a network of green infrastructure across the Borough. 3. What is Green Infrastructure? 3.1 Green Infrastructure (GI) is defined by the NPPF as “A network of multi- functional green space, urban and rural, which is capable of delivering a wide range of environmental and quality of life benefits for local communities”. 3.2 The National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) states that Local Plans should identify the strategic location of existing and proposed green infrastructure networks, and that GI can include: • Parks; • Open spaces; • Playing fields; • Woodlands; • Trees; • Allotments; • Private gardens; • Streams and water bodies; and • Features such as green roofs and walls. 3.3 In addition, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and ecological networks can also include areas of multifunction green infrastructure, so have been included as part of this study. 2 Green Infrastructure and Ecological Networks – March 2018 4. What are Ecological Networks? 4.1 The NPPF defines ecological networks as areas that “link sites of biodiversity importance” and include: • Designated sites of biodiversity importance: • International – Special Areas of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Areas (SPA), RAMSAR (and candidate SAC,SPA and Ramsar sites); • National – Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB); • Local – Local Wildlife Sites (LWS), Local Nature Reserves (LNRs), Regionally Important Geological Sites (RIGS). • Wildlife corridors and stepping stones; and • Areas identified by local partnerships for habitat restoration or creation. 4.2 The Kent Local Nature Partnership (LNP) has identified wildlife corridors and stepping stones across the county, known as Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs)2along with conservation priorities for each. These areas are where the LNP believe that the delivery of Kent Biodiversity Strategy3 targets should be focussed in order to deliver maximum biodiversity benefits, through habitat enhancement, restoration and recreation. 5. Why do we need Green Infrastructure? 5.1 National policy identifies that GI is important to the delivery of high quality sustainable development, alongside other forms of infrastructure such as transport, energy, waste and water, and that it can help to deliver a variety of planning policy objectives. 5.2 Multi-functional GI is capable of providing multiple benefits, for communities, the economy and the environment including: • Improving health and well-being by encouraging exercise, sport, active recreation, spiritual well-being and quiet contemplation • Promoting a sense of community • Helping to establish local identity and a sense of place • Improving environmental quality e.g. better air and water quality, local climate control and noise attenuation • Reducing pollution by increasing vegetation cover and by encouraging walking, cycling and horse riding to reduce dependency on the private car 2 http://kentnature.org.uk/kent-biodiversity-strategy2.html 3 Kent Biodiversity 2020 and beyond – a strategy for the natural environment 2015-2025 produced the Kent Local Nature Partnership http://kentnature.org.uk/kent-biodiversity-strategy.html 3 Green Infrastructure and Ecological Networks – March 2018 • Contributing to sustainable drainage and flood mitigation • Reducing urban heat islands • Providing the opportunity for the preservation, restoration and re- creation of priority habitats and the protection and recovery of priority species • Allowing for species to adapt to changing climate through linking habitats to ease migration. Functional connectivity between areas of wildlife habitat is likely to make it easier for populations of species to move across the landscape in response to environmental change • Helping to protect and enhance biodiversity. Small, isolated areas of habitat are likely to hold proportionately fewer species than larger areas, and the populations of these species are likely to be more vulnerable to local extinction. Large, inter-connected areas of habitat are more likely to be sustainable in the long-term as natural processes can act to maintain habitats, and there is less need for deliberate management • Contributing to the protection, management and enhancement of historic and natural sites and areas • Reducing land management costs • Providing an enhanced environmental backdrop that will assist in attracting business and inward investment • Promoting sustainable transport by providing a permeable and logical network of routes between key destinations and green spaces to encourage walking, cycling and horse riding. 4 Green Infrastructure and Ecological Networks – March 2018 6. Methodology & Analysis Stage 1 6.1 The first stage in the preparation of the Green Infrastructure and Ecological Network involved mapping the various existing environmental assets in the Borough, as well as identifying potential opportunity areas for future provision. Open Space Audit 6.2 The Council has updated the existing evidence as featured in the Open Space Strategy (OSS) (2009).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bus and Rail Guide
    FREQUENCY GUIDE FREQUENCY (MINUTES) Chatham Town Centre Gillingham Town Centre Monday – Friday Saturday Sunday Operator where to board your bus where to board your bus Service Route Daytime Evening Daytime Evening Daytime Evening 1 M Chatham - Chatham Maritime - Dockside Outlet Centre - Universities at Medway Campus 20 minutes - 20 minutes - hourly - AR Destination Service Number Bus Stop (- Gillingham ASDA) - Liberty Quays - The Strand (- Riverside Country Park (Suns)) Fort Amherst d t . i a e Hempstead Valley 116 E J T o e t Coouncil Offices r . R t e Trinity Road S d R e 2 S M Chatham - Chatham Maritime - Dockside Outlet Centre 20 minutes 20 minutes 20 minutes 20 minutes 20 minutes 20 minutes AR m Medway r u ll t Liberty Quays 176 177 (Eves/Sun) D H D o PUBLIC x rt Y i S ha Park o O K M A CAR F n t 6*-11* Grain - Lower Stoke - Allhallows - High Halstow - Hoo - Hundred of Hoo Academy school - - - - - AR 16 e C C e PPARKARK d ro Lower Halstow 326 327 E J e s W W r s Chathamtham Library K i r T Bus and rail guide A t A E S 15 D T S R C tr E E e t 100 M St Mary’s Island - Chatham Maritime - Chatham Rail Station (see also 1/2 and 151) hourly - hourly - - - AR and Community Hub E e t O 19 R E Lower Rainham 131* A J T F r R e A R F e T e E . r D M T n S t Crown St.
    [Show full text]
  • TIMETABLE 142 & 185.Cdr
    TIMETABLE OF ALL BUSES AT DAVIS ESTATE BUS 185 Mondays to Fridays - not Bank, National or Public Holdays Nu-Venture service number 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 185 CHATHAM WATERFRONT BUS STN STOP A7 - - 1018 1108 1158 a 1248 e 1350 1550 1705 1815 Chatham Station - - 1021 1111 1201 a 1251 e 1353 1553 1708 1818 Grosvenor Avenue - - 1024 1114 1204 a 1254 e 1356 1556 1711 1821 Wilson Avenue/Wallace Road - - 1027 1117 1207 a 1257 e 1359 1559 p - - Huntsmans Corner - - - - - - - 1559 z 1714 1824 Blue Bell Hill Village 0747 - - - - - - - - - Bridgewood Roundabout northbound 0751 - - - - - - - - - Davis Estate Vale Road 0758 0915 1030 1120 1210 a 1300 e R R R R Davis Estate opp Holland Rd Shops 0802 0920 1035 1125 1215 a 1305 e R R R R Davis Estate Shirley Ave Shops, Post Office 0806 0926 1041 1131 1221 a 1311 e R R R R Bridgewood Roundabout southbound - - - - - - - R R - Blue Bell Hill Village - - - - - - - R R - Wilson Avenue/Wallace Road - 0930 1045 1135 1225 a 1315 e - - - - Huntsmans Corner 0810 - - - - - - - - - Grosvenor Avenue 0813 0933 1048 1138 1228 a 1318 e - - - - CHATHAM WATERFRONT BUS STATION 0820 0939 1054 1144 1234 a 1324 e - - - - Saturdays - also work-days between Christmas and New Year Nu-Venture service number 185 185 185 185 185 185 CHATHAM WATERFRONT BUS STN STOP A7 - 0956 1156 1356 1550 1730 Chatham Station - 0959 1159 1359 1553 1733 Grosvenor Avenue - 1002 1202 1402 1556 1736 Huntsmans Corner - 1005 1205 1405 1559 1739 Blue Bell Hill Village 0752 - - - - - Bridgewood Roundabout northbound 0756 - - - - - Davis Estate Vale Road 0803 1008 1208 1408 R R Davis Estate opp Holland Rd Shops 0807 1013 1213 1413 R R Davis Estate Shirley Ave Shops, Post Office 0811 1019 1219 1419 R R Bridgewood Roundabout southbound - - - - R R Blue Bell Hill Village - - - - R R Huntsmans Corner 0815 1023 1223 1423 - - Grosvenor Avenue 0818 1026 1226 1426 - - CHATHAM WATERFRONT BUS STATION 0825 1032 1232 1432 - - NO SERVICE ON SUNDAYS, BANK, NATIONAL OR PUBLIC HOLIDAYS, OR ON 1 JANUARY, 25/26 DECEMBER.
    [Show full text]
  • The Warren Farm Chamber: a Reconsideration
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society THE WARREN FARM CHAMBER: A RECONSIDERATION PAUL ASHBEE At least seven ruined but recognisable stone-chambered long barrows, Kit's Coty House being the best known, still remain in the Medway valley where that river cuts through the chalk of the North Downs. They had exceptionally high rectangular chambers, proportional facades, and stone kerbs. In plan they recall the southern English earthen long barrows, originally of timber, such as Fussell's Lodge in Wiltshire (Ashbee 1966). They are distinct from other groups and are likely to have been versions of the stone-built long barrows of Holland and Northern Germany (Ashbee 1999). The Medway's megalithic long barrows (Fig. 1), like others of their kind, were surrogate long houses (Ashbee 1999, 270) and also repositories for human remains rather than mere tombs. There may have been centuries of recourse to them, before they were finally sealed with occupation debris (Piggott 1962, 26; Woodward 1993). Their construction with sarsen stones, some of almost Stonehenge calibre, required considerable labour, while they cannot but have fulfilled a central role for the Neolithic communities of the terrain that was to become Kent. Early in 1822 the great stones of a long barrow chamber's remnant part were encountered, just within the 300ft contour, and close by Warren Farm, on Blue Bell Hill (NGR TQ 753 606). An obstruction to ploughing had led to digging which disclosed large sarsen stones just below the surface. George Fowle, of Cobtree Manor, the landowner, ordered their removal, but when three uprights emerged he determined that they should be uncovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Well Autumn 2012 Final Copy
    THE WELL Kemsing Village Magazine with news from Woodlands Autumn 2012 No 187 CONTENTS - The Well Autumn 2012 No 187 Olympics 2012 3 Life on the Hill 19 Vicar s letter 4 PCSO Adrian Fromm 21 Church Services 5 Kemsing School Report 23 Memorial to Don Eley 7 News from Cotmans Ash 25 Emergency phone numbers 9 Rainbows & Church Carpet 26 Parish Council News 11 Family Milestones 28 News & Notes and PTA News 13 Kemsing Festival Plaque 30 Chancel Repair Liability 15 St. Mary s Church Choir 30 Monty Parkin 16/17 Village Diary 31 Editorial Team:- Doreen Farrow, Janet Eaton & Rosemary Banister. We reserve the right to edit [i.e. cut, précis, alter, correct grammar or spelling] any item published, and our decision is final. Cover picture shows the Well area in Summer. Our thanks are due to the Kemsing Gardener s Society for their care and attention to this colourful area. Cover Picture by Janet Eaton COPY FOR NEXT ISSUE Please submit any items or articles for the next issue of The Well before 1st November 2012 to [email protected] THE WELL - is published and distributed free, four times a year by the Parochial Church Councils of St Mary s Church, Kemsing and St Mary s Church, Woodlands, to encourage and stimulate the life of the community. The views expressed in the magazine do not nec- essarily represent official church opinion or policy. If you use a computer to type your article, it would be extremely helpful if you could Email it to: [email protected] or send to the Editors c/o Poppies Cottage, 3, St.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WELL Kemsing Village Magazine with News from Woodlands
    THE WELL Kemsing Village Magazine with news from Woodlands Winter 2012 No 188 New future for Chart Stud Farm see centre pages 8 CONTENTS - The Well Winter 2012 No 188 Christmas Services 3 Life on the Hill 19 Vicar s letter 4 PTA News 21 Church Services 5 A Spring Challenge 23 Library happenings 7 News from Cotmans Ash 25 CCTV 9 Kemsing School Report 26 Parish Council News 11 Family Milestones 28 News and Notes 13 Craft Group 30 St. Clere & Chart Stud Farm 15/16/17 Village Diary 31 Editorial Team:- Doreen Farrow, Janet Eaton & Rosemary Banister. We reserve the right to edit [i.e. cut, précis, alter, correct grammar or spelling] any item published, and our decision is final. Cover picture shows St. Mary s Church in Winter. Cover Picture by Janet Eaton COPY FOR NEXT ISSUE Please submit any items or articles for the next issue of The Well before 1st February 2013 to [email protected] THE WELL - is published and distributed free, four times a year by the Parochial Church Councils of St Mary s Church, Kemsing and St Mary s Church, Wood- lands, to encourage and stimulate the life of the community. The views expressed in the magazine do not necessarily represent official church opinion or policy. If you use a computer to type your article, it would be extremely helpful if you could Email it to: [email protected] or send to the Editors c/o Poppies Cottage, 3, St. Edith Road, Kemsing TN15 6PT, For postal subscriptions, contact Debbie Pierson 01732 762033 2 3 Vicar s Letter Dear Friends One of the strange things about being a vicar is that you re always thinking ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Site and Surroundings
    Ashford Borough Council - Report of Development Control Managers Planning Committee 18 July 2012 ___________________________________________________________________ Application Number 12/00630/AS Location Car Park at Hothfield Common, Cades Road, Hothfield, Kent Grid Reference 97175/45879 Parish Council Hothfield Ward Downs West Application Extension to existing car park Description Applicant Head of Cultural and Project Services, Ashford Borough Council, Civic Centre, Tannery Lane, Ashford, Kent TN23 1PL Agent Mr Gary Vince, Project Office, Ashford Borough Council, Civic Centre, Tannery Lane, Ashford, Kent TN2 1PL Site Area 0.06ha (a) 4/6(r) (b) - (c) NE: X Introduction 1. This application is reported to the Planning Committee as the applicant is Ashford Borough Council Site and Surroundings 2. The application site is an existing unmade up car parking area and adjoining land situated adjacent to and accessed directly from Cades Road. The northern side of the site is currently covered by trees and shrubs and fenced off from the road by low level post and rail fencing; there is also a toilet block directly to the east of the site. The application site is located adjacent to Hothfield Common Site of Special Scientific Interest and Local Wildlife Area. 3. A Site plan is attached as Annex 1 6.1 Ashford Borough Council - Report of Development Control Managers Planning Committee 18 July 2012 ___________________________________________________________________ Proposal 4. Full planning permission is sought for an extension to the existing car park at Hothfield Common. The development would mean the laying of approximately 570m² of self-binding gravel hard surfacing to the northern side of the existing car parking area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Medway Megaliths and Neolithic Kent
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society THE MEDWAY MEGALITHS AND NEOLITHIC KENT* ROBIN HOLGATE, B.Sc. INTRODUCTION The Medway megaliths constitute a geographically well-defined group of this Neolithic site-type1 and are the only megalithic group in eastern England. Previous accounts of these monuments2 have largely been devoted to their morphology and origins; a study in- corporating current trends in British megalithic studies is therefore long overdue. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN BRITISH MEGALITHIC STUDIES Until the late 1960s, megalithic chambered barrows and cairns were considered to have functioned purely as tombs: they were the burial vaults and funerary monuments for people living in the fourth and third millennia B.C. The first academic studies of these monuments therefore concentrated on the typological analysis of their plans. This method of analysis, though, has often produced incorrect in- terpretations: without excavation it is often impossible to reconstruct the sequence of development and original appearance for a large number of megaliths. In addition, plan-typology disregards other aspects related to them, for example constructional * I am indebted to Peter Drewett for reading and commenting on a first draft of this article; naturally I take responsibility for all the views expressed. 1 G.E. Daniel, The Prehistoric Chamber Tombs of England and Wales, Cambridge, 1950, 12. 2 Daniel, op. cit; J.H. Evans, 'Kentish Megalith Types', Arch. Cant, Ixiii (1950), 63-81; R.F. Jessup, South-East England, London, 1970. 221 THE MEDWAY MEGALITHS GRAVESEND. ROCHESTER CHATHAM r>v.-5rt AYLESFORD MAIDSTONE Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Dave Brown by Dave Brown, 12-May-10 01:22 AM GMT
    Dave Brown by dave brown, 12-May-10 01:22 AM GMT Saturday 8th May 2010. One look out of the window told me today was not the day for butterflies or dragonflies. A phone call from a friend then had us heading to my favourite place. Good old Dungeness. Scenery not the best in the world but the wildlife exceeedingly good. Thirty minutes later we were watching a Whiskered Tern hawking insects over the New Diggings, showing from the road to Lydd. Also present were a few hundred Swifts, Swallows, House and Sand Martins, together with a few Common Terns. A quick chat with Dave Walker (very friendly Observatory Warden) and his equally friendly assistant confirmed that the recent weather there meant little or no Butterfly or moth activity. With the rain falling harder it was time to leave Dunge and head inland. The Iberian Chifchaf at Waderslade had already been present over a week so it was time to catch up with it. On arrival at the small wood of Chesnut Avenue the bird showed and sang within a few minutes of our arrival. This is still a scarce bird in Britain so where was the crowd. In 30 minutes the maximum crowd was five, and that included 3 from our family. It sang for long periods of time and only once did it mutter the usual Chifchaf call, otherwise it was Iberian Chifchaf all the way. It also look slighlty diferent in structure and colour. To my eyes the upper parts were greener, the legs were a brown colour and the tail appeared longer.
    [Show full text]
  • Visiting the Kent Countryside – a Guide for Parents of Children with Autism
    !"#"$%&'()*' +*%(',-.%(/0#"1* !"#$%&'"()*"+!*',-." )("/0%1&*',"2%-0"!$3.4 This booklet aims to help parents and carers of children with autism to access nature and the countryside in Kent. It should also prove useful to those living and working with adults with autism. The booklet represents the first in a series of projects to be undertaken by Autism and Nature, a new Social Enterprise. It begins by introducing some of the health benefits of nature and the countryside for children with autism. This is followed by a guide to ‘natural’ places to visit in the Kent countryside, which the authors believe many children with autism might enjoy. The booklet concludes with a series of case stories, describing visits to the countryside by school children with autism and related conditions. Supported by ISBN: 978-0-9571525-0-2 Published by David Blakesley and Simon Payne with illustrations by Tharada Blakesley !"#"$%&'()*' +*%(',-.%(/0#"1* !"#$%&'"()*"+!*',-." )("/0%1&*',"2%-0"!$3.4 David Blakesley and Simon Payne with illustrations by Tharada Blakesley ! Citation For bibliographic purposes, this book should be referred to as Blakesley, D. and Payne, S. 2012. Visiting the Kent Countryside – a guide for parents of children with autism. Autism and Nature, Kent. The rights of David Blakesley and Simon Payne to be identified as the Authors of this work have been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Copyright © rests with the authors Illustrations © Tharada Blakesley; photographs © David Blakesley, unless stated in the text All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without prior permission of the authors First published 2012 British-Library-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Designed by Pisces Publications Published by Autism and Nature Printed by Information Press ISBN 978-0-9571525-0-2 All reasonable efforts have been made by the authors to trace the copyright owners of the material quoted in this book and any images reproduced in this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
    Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Potential Local Nature Reserves
    Appendix 1 Evaluation of Potential Local Nature Reserves Main Report For Maidstone Borough Council September 2019 Wimpey Field, Staplehurst Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Background to this Report ........................................................................................................ 1 Selecting Local Nature Reserves .............................................................................................. 2 Setting up a Local Nature Reserve ........................................................................................... 3 Approach to Evaluation ............................................................................................................ 4 Constraints to LNR Designation................................................................................................ 8 Evaluation of the Sites .................................................................................................... 9 The Sites .................................................................................................................................. 9 Summary of Evaluation .......................................................................................................... 15 Introduction Background to this Report Local Nature Reserves (LNRs) are a statutory designation made under Section 21 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949 by principal local authorities. They are places
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRYSIDE Page 1 of 16
    Page 1 of 16 COUNTRYSIDE Introduction 12.1 Shepway has a rich and diverse landscape ranging from the rolling chalk downland and dry valleys of the North Downs, through the scarp and dip slope of the Old Romney Shoreline, to Romney Marsh and the unique shingle feature of the Dungeness peninsula. This diversity is reflected in the range of Natural Areas and Countryside Character Areas, identified by English Nature and the Countryside Agency respectively, which cover the District. The particular landscape and wildlife value of large parts of the District is also recognised through protective countryside designations, including Sites of Special Scientific Interest and Heritage Coastline, as well as the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. The countryside also plays host to a wide range of activities and it is recognised that the health of the rural economy and the health of the countryside are inter-linked. A function of the Local Plan is to achieve a sustainable pattern of development in the countryside. This involves a balance between the needs of rural land users and maintaining and enhancing countryside character and quality. 12.2 This balance is achieved in two main ways:- a. By focussing most development in urban areas, particularly on previously developed sites and ensuring that sufficient land is allocated to meet identified development requirements, thus reducing uncertainty and speculation on ‘greenfield’ sites in the countryside. b. By making firm policy statements relating to: the general principles to be applied to all proposals in the countryside; specific types of development in the countryside; and the protection of particularly important areas.
    [Show full text]