Conservation of the Richmond Birdwing Butterfly in Australia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conservation of the Richmond Birdwing Butterfly in Australia Conservation of the Richmond Birdwing Butterfl y in Australia (see Fig. 1.10) Donald P.A. Sands • Tim R. New Conservation of the Richmond Birdwing Butterfl y in Australia Donald P.A. Sands Tim R. New Ecosystem Sciences Department of Zoology CSIRO, Brisbane La Trobe University Australia Melbourne Victoria , Australia ISBN 978-94-007-7169-7 ISBN 978-94-007-7170-3 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7170-3 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013947380 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Pref ace Members of the butterfl y family Papilionidae, the swallowtails and their allies, are amongst the most generally admired and popular of all insects – rivalled, perhaps, only by some of the larger beetles as foci for collection and as important fl agships for conservation advocacy and garnering public approval of invertebrates. Amongst these, the colourful and spectacular ‘birdwings’, the largest of all butterfl ies, are the most charismatic and have gained a unique reputation amongst naturalists since their discoveries from the nineteenth century. Refl ecting their rarity and restriction to remote and diffi cult-to-access parts of the Indo-Australian tropics and subtropics, several birdwing species became objects of wonder, as well as of desire, and also commercially rewarding – so that supply of cabinet specimens of rare species to wealthy collectors, mostly in Europe, was a popular and lucrative activity for explorers, aided by the perceived ‘romanticism’ of the butterfl ies and their largely unknown tropical forest and montane environments. However, many of these butterfl ies, depending on the resources furnished within primary tropical forests, have become increasingly vulnerable as those forests have been cleared or otherwise changed, and are now of serious conservation concern. Conservation of birdwings must occur largely in regions in which resident entomologists and conservation biologists are few, political and social sensitivities may be acute, and in which such activities necessarily have low priority in relation to solving the needs of human welfare. These scenarios differ fundamentally from the more familiar contexts for butterfl y conservation in temperate regions, areas peopled by those both sympathetic to conserving insects and having the resources and drives to do so, under conditions that can be coordinated, monitored and publicised effectively. Conservation measures must draw on biological knowledge and understanding, but progress also depends heavily on the goodwill and support of local people. Approaches to conserving poorly known and rare taxa in remote areas contrast markedly with many of the more familiar site-specific conservation exercises for relatively well-understood butterfl ies in accessible temperate regions. Simply gaining the foundation information for action and the capability to pursue the aims of any conservation management plan are formidable obstacles. Understandably, adding further to diffi culty, conservation of strongly fl ying birdwings – their popular v vi Preface name refl ecting both appearance and activity – has tended towards the landscape scale rather than focusing on small sites. It has emphasised the need for security of the parental forest environments on which the butterfl ies depend, through formal protection and sympathetic management to prevent their destruction. These themes are discussed further in this book, in which we summarise and describe the continuing conservation programme developed for an unusual birdwing, the Australian endemic Ornithoptera richmondia (Gray), the Richmond birdwing butterfl y, that has undergone substantial decline due to habitat loss and resource alienation but for which coordinated and persistent effort has done much to redress these impacts. The project has been pioneering in many ways and has an important place in the development of insect conservation in Australia; it also provides information of considerable value for related species. The enduring commitment and support of people over the entire historical range of the butterfl y has been (and remains) pivotal to progress. More broadly, butterfl y conservation in Australia has advanced considerably in recent decades, and a national Action Plan for Australia’s Butterfl ies (Sands and New 2002) remains the only such compilation for any invertebrate group. In that document, we reviewed the conservation status and needs of all Australian species and subspecies and included individual dossiers on all taxa then of possible concern . Many of these taxa were then poorly known. The bulk of subsequent activity has emphasised ecologically specialised butterfl ies with restricted ranges and which are perceived as threatened in the south-east of the continent (New 2011c). The long-running conservation campaigns for the Eltham copper ( Paralucia pyrodiscus lucida Crosby) and Bathurst copper ( P. spinifera Edwards and Common) (Lycaenidae) are the only long-term parallels in Australia to that for O. richmondia . Each focuses on a notable regional fl agship taxon, for which public support and local pride have been garnered and sustained, and for which a strong sense of ‘community ownership’ remains of key importance. However, the contrast between focusing on the tiny isolated urban remnant sites – such as those on which the Eltham copper persists near Melbourne – and on entire landscapes is immense. Together these examples span the range of scale of species-orientated conservation exercises and of constituent and political infl uences that can occur. One purpose of this book is to document how such problems of scale can be addressed in attempting to study and conserve a wide-ranging fl agship taxon, and how interest in doing so has been encouraged over more than two decades. It is also the fi rst such account for any birdwing butterfl y in Australia. The only related programme is the very different scenario for Queen Alexandra’s Birdwing, Ornithoptera alexandrae Rothschild, noted in the introductory chapter. Interest in that magnifi cent insect continues, and unlike the remote areas of Papua New Guinea where this birdwing is endemic, O. richmondia occurs within an Australian region in which conservation sensitivities are well understood and where tangible support is available (although in a politically complex context, in which individual priorities are very varied), and the lessons learned have far wider relevance. Any such exercise becomes one of continuing compromise. To quote from New et al. (1995), referring to New Guinea birdwings, ‘practical involvement of local communities is an integral Preface vii facet of conservation management for these “rare butterfl ies” and O. richmondia in Australia represents a similar strategy in a more developed country’. That story is the core of this book. Following a general introduction to the birdwing butterfl ies and their conserva- tion needs, the history of interest in the Richmond birdwing is reviewed and its biology and decline summarised. The critical importance of larval food plant resources and their propagation and use for habitat extension and rehabilitation are discussed, together with the ecology and composition of biotopes within which these vines occur. The development of conservation interest and the progressive involvement of community groups, culminating in a dedicated volunteer network, are the major themes of the second half of the book. We attempt to display how biological knowledge, public goodwill and political support have been integrated towards this common endeavour, and to discuss the complex issues and confl icts that have arisen. Implicit in the entire project has been a variety of community efforts, through which well-coordinated
Recommended publications
  • Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter
    Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter No 23, February 2012 THE RICHMOND BIRDWING CONSERVATION NETWORK As a Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network (RBCN) operates under the umbrella of the Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland (WPSQ), RBCN promotes conservation of the Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia , its food plants, Pararistolochia spp. and butterfly habitats. Subscription to RBCN is open to anyone interested in the Richmond birdwing butterfly or insects of conservation concern. RBCN encourages liaison between community members, Catchment and Landcare groups and relevant government authorities. RBCN holds occasional General Meetings, Workshops and Field Days. The RBCN Committee is elected each year to manage day to day activities of the Network. Corridor Coordinators are elected as RBCN contacts for local members and other community groups. RBCN NETWORK COMMITTEE Dr Chris Hosking (Chair) [email protected] Hugh Krenske (RBCN Website) Greg Siepen (Grants) [email protected] [email protected] Ray Seddon (Committee) Richard Bull (Committee) [email protected] [email protected] Dr Ian Gynther Dr Don Sands (Editor Publications) [email protected] [email protected] Corridor Cordinators Dale Borgelt (Brisbane Region) Keth McCosh (Scenic Rim) [email protected] [email protected] Ray Seddon (Sunshine Coast) Richard Bull (Gold Coast-Tamborine) [email protected] [email protected] www.richmondbirdwing.org.au Annual Subscription $15 per annum payable
    [Show full text]
  • Why “Tagala” Vines Are NOT Good for Richmond Birdwing Butterflies
    Why “Tagala” Vines are NOT good for Richmond Birdwing Butterflies Tagala vines (Aristolochia acuminata , formerly known as A. tagala ) grow very quickly and produce more, softer leaves during the warmer, wetter months, than Birdwing Butterfly Vines ( Paraistolochia praevenosa and P. laheyana ). Tagala vines are one of the food plants of the Cairns Birdwing Butterfly (Ornithoptera euphorion ) and it occurs naturally from Mackay north to Cape York Peninsula. Birdwing Butterfly vines occur naturally in south-eastern Queensland and northern New South Wales and are the only natural food plants for the Richmond Birdwing Butterfly. In each geographical area, separated by up to 500 km, both food plants and the Richmond and Cairns birdwing butterflies, have co-evolved for more than 40,000 years. In this time each butterfly has become specialised in its food requirements and both have adapted to feed successfully on their local food plants. Richmond Birdwing Butterfly larvae (caterpillars) are ideally adapted to their natural food plants in subtropical eastern Australia, the Birdwing Butterfly vine (P. praevenosa ) and Mountain Aristolochia (P. laheyana ) When adults deposit their eggs on leaves of their natural food plants, eggs will hatch and larvae will develop normally when feeding on the leaves. However, when Richmond Birdwing butterflies lay eggs on northern Tagala vines (A. acuminata ), instead of their natural food plants, the Tagala vines appear to be toxic to eggs, preventing them from hatching properly. These toxic compounds diffuse from the leaf into the Richmond Birdwing Butterfly eggs and often kill them it. Recent studies have shown that when the Richmond Birdwing larvae attach to the Tagala leaf, the toxic compounds diffuse into the terminal segments of the pupae, sometimes killing them, or preventing them from emerging as healthy adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay)
    BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PROGRAM Brooklyn, Cloudland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) Nature Refuges Eubenangee Swamp, Hann Tableland, Melsonby (Gaarraay) National Parks Upper Bridge Creek Queensland 29 April–27 May · 26–27 July 2010 Australian Biological Resources Study What is Contents Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a four-year, What is Bush Blitz? 2 multi-million dollar Abbreviations 2 partnership between the Summary 3 Australian Government, Introduction 4 BHP Billiton and Earthwatch Reserves Overview 6 Australia to document plants Methods 11 and animals in selected properties across Australia’s Results 14 National Reserve System. Discussion 17 Appendix A: Species Lists 31 Fauna 32 This innovative partnership Vertebrates 32 harnesses the expertise of many Invertebrates 50 of Australia’s top scientists from Flora 62 museums, herbaria, universities, Appendix B: Threatened Species 107 and other institutions and Fauna 108 organisations across the country. Flora 111 Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 113 Fauna 114 Flora 115 Glossary 119 Abbreviations ANHAT Australian Natural Heritage Assessment Tool EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) NCA Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Queensland) NRS National Reserve System 2 Bush Blitz survey report Summary A Bush Blitz survey was conducted in the Cape Exotic vertebrate pests were not a focus York Peninsula, Einasleigh Uplands and Wet of this Bush Blitz, however the Cane Toad Tropics bioregions of Queensland during April, (Rhinella marina) was recorded in both Cloudland May and July 2010. Results include 1,186 species Nature Refuge and Hann Tableland National added to those known across the reserves. Of Park. Only one exotic invertebrate species was these, 36 are putative species new to science, recorded, the Spiked Awlsnail (Allopeas clavulinus) including 24 species of true bug, 9 species of in Cloudland Nature Refuge.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Communications Legislation Committee Answers to Questions on Notice Environment Portfolio
    Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications Legislation Committee Answers to questions on notice Environment portfolio Question No: 3 Hearing: Additional Estimates Outcome: Outcome 1 Programme: Biodiversity Conservation Division (BCD) Topic: Threatened Species Commissioner Hansard Page: N/A Question Date: 24 February 2016 Question Type: Written Senator Waters asked: The department has noted that more than $131 million has been committed to projects in support of threatened species – identifying 273 Green Army Projects, 88 20 Million Trees projects, 92 Landcare Grants (http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/3be28db4-0b66-4aef-9991- 2a2f83d4ab22/files/tsc-report-dec2015.pdf) 1. Can the department provide an itemised list of these projects, including title, location, description and amount funded? Answer: Please refer to below table for itemised lists of projects addressing threatened species outcomes, including title, location, description and amount funded. INFORMATION ON PROJECTS WITH THREATENED SPECIES OUTCOMES The following projects were identified by the funding applicant as having threatened species outcomes and were assessed against the criteria for the respective programme round. Funding is for a broad range of activities, not only threatened species conservation activities. Figures provided for the Green Army are approximate and are calculated on the 2015-16 indexed figure of $176,732. Some of the funding is provided in partnership with State & Territory Governments. Additional projects may be approved under the Natinoal Environmental Science programme and the Nest to Ocean turtle Protection Programme up to the value of the programme allocation These project lists reflect projects and funding originally approved. Not all projects will proceed to completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristolochia Serpentaria L
    New England Plant Conservation Program Aristolochia serpentaria L. Virginia Snakeroot Conservation and Research Plan for New England Prepared by: Dorothy J. Allard, Ph.D. Analytical Resources, LLC P.O. Box 279 East Montpelier, VT 05651 For: New England Wild Flower Society 180 Hemenway Road Framingham, MA 01701 508/877-7630 e-mail: [email protected] • website: www.newfs.org Approved, Regional Advisory Council, 2002 SUMMARY Aristolochia serpentaria L., commonly known as Virginia Snakeroot, is a perennial herb in the Aristolochiaceae. Several varieties have been described in the past, but they are no longer recognized in most taxonomic manuals. Aristolochia serpentaria occurs in 26 eastern states and is common in the southern and central part of its range, while becoming rare along its northern periphery. It is listed as a Division 2 species in Flora Conservanda (Brumback and Mehrhoff et al. 1996). Connecticut is the only New England state in which it is found, where it occurs at 12 known sites in ten towns. It grows in a variety of upland forest communities, but is more likely to be found in dry, somewhat rich, rocky, deciduous or mixed deciduous-coniferous woods in Connecticut. Farther south, it also has broad environmental requirements, occupying many upland soil and forest types. Population trends for the species in Connecticut are unclear. One new population was discovered in 2001. Monitoring in 2001 of eight extant sites found that two populations had decreased, three had increased, and one had stayed the same. Several known populations are threatened by habitat modification, invasive species, or site fragility. Two extant populations have not been surveyed for several years.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Document: Roc: Aristolochic Acids ; 2010
    FINAL Report on Carcinogens Background Document for Aristolochic Acids September 2, 2008 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Services National Toxicology Program Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 This Page Intentionally Left Blank RoC Background Document for Aristolochic Acids FOREWORD 1 The Report on Carcinogens (RoC) is prepared in response to Section 301 of the Public 2 Health Service Act as amended. The RoC contains a list of identified substances (i) that 3 either are known to be human carcinogens or are reasonably be anticipated to be human 4 carcinogens and (ii) to which a significant number of persons residing in the United 5 States are exposed. The Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), has 6 delegated responsibility for preparation of the RoC to the National Toxicology Program 7 (NTP), which prepares the report with assistance from other Federal health and 8 regulatory agencies and nongovernmental institutions. 9 Nominations for (1) listing a new substance, (2) reclassifying the listing status for a 10 substance already listed, or (3) removing a substance already listed in the RoC are 11 reviewed in a multi-step, scientific review process with multiple opportunities for public 12 comment. The scientific peer-review groups evaluate and make independent 13 recommendations for each nomination according to specific RoC listing criteria. This 14 background document was prepared to assist in the review of aristolochic acids. The 15 scientific information used to prepare Sections 3 through 5 of this document must come 16 from publicly available, peer-reviewed sources. Information in Sections 1 and 2, 17 including chemical and physical properties, analytical methods, production, use, and 18 occurrence may come from published and/or unpublished sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Forensic and Pharmacognostic Study of Aristolochia Ringens Stem
    orensi f F c R o e l s a e n r a r u c 6 o h Minari and Idris, J Forensic Res 2015, :1 J Journal of Forensic Research DOI: 10.4172/2157-7145.1000257 ISSN: 2157-7145 Research Article Open Access Forensic and Pharmacognostic Study of Aristolochia ringens Stem Minari JB* and Idris MA Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, University of Lagos, Nigeria Abstract Aristolochia ringens is considered as a local stimulant which could influence criminal behavior. In the present investigation, the detailed pharmacognostic study of A. ringens stem is carried out to lay down the standards, which could be useful in future Forensic identification of unknown plant material. The study includes macroscopic, microscopic, prelimimary phytochemical screening and physiochemical evaluation. The objective of this study was to characterize the unknown plant material seized from the scene of crime. In the present study, a TLC-method was described for the identification of A. ringens stem. Keywords: A. ringens stem; Stimulant; Pharmacognostics; TLC; impression of a gaping mouth. Due to their spectacular flowers, several Macroscopy species are used as ornamental plants. Epidemiological and laboratory studies have identified Aristolochia to be a dangerous kidney toxin; Introduction Aristolochia has been shown to be associated with more than 100 cases Aristolochia is a large plant genus with over 500 species. The of kidney failure [4,5]. It has been confirmed that naturally occurring scientific name Aristolochia was developed from Ancient Greek carcinogenic compounds have been found in plants within the genus aristos (άριστος) “best” + locheia (λοχεία), “childbirth” or “childbed,” Aristolochia as of 2013 [6].
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter
    Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter No 21, June 2011 RICHMOND BIRDWING CONSERVATION NETWORK The Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network (RBCN) is a community- based Group, under the umbrella of the Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland (WPSQ). RBCN promotes conservation of the Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia , its food plants, Pararistolochia spp. and habitats for the butterfly. Subscription to the Network is open to anyone interested in the Richmond birdwing or other insects of conservation concern. RBCN encourages liaison between community members, Catchment and Landcare groups, and relevant local and state government authorities. RBCN hosts General Meetings, Workshops and Field Days. This Newsletter is published by the Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland. The RBCN Network Committee thanks Lois Hughes for permission to reproduce the delightful illustrations on covers of this series. RBCN OFFICE BEARERS Network Committee Chairman (Acting ) Retiring Chair (2010-11) Hugh Krenske (National Data Base) Greg Siepen (Projects/Grants) [email protected] [email protected] Ray Seddon (Corridor Convenor) Joan Heavey [email protected] [email protected] Chris Hosking (Assist. Editor) Susan Rielly [email protected] [email protected] Dr Ian Gynther (DERM collaboration) Don Sands (Newsletter Editor) [email protected] [email protected] www.richmondbirdwing.org.au Subscriptions ($15 per annum payable to RBCN-WPSQ) and all correspondence to be sent to: The
    [Show full text]
  • TAXON:Aristolochia Ringens Vahl SCORE:8.0 RATING:High Risk
    TAXON: Aristolochia ringens Vahl SCORE: 8.0 RATING: High Risk Taxon: Aristolochia ringens Vahl Family: Aristolochiaceae Common Name(s): gaping dutchman's pipe Synonym(s): Aristolochia globiflora Mutis Aristolochia turbacensis Kunth Howardia ringens (Vahl) Klotzsch Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 20 Jul 2018 WRA Score: 8.0 Designation: H(HPWRA) Rating: High Risk Keywords: Tropical Vine, Naturalized, Weedy, Shade-Tolerant, Wind-Dispersed Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed 304 Environmental weed 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic
    [Show full text]
  • TAXON:Aristolochia Trilobata L. SCORE:3.0 RATING:Evaluate
    TAXON: Aristolochia trilobata L. SCORE: 3.0 RATING: Evaluate Taxon: Aristolochia trilobata L. Family: Aristolochiaceae Common Name(s): Dutchman's pipe Synonym(s): Aristolochia caracasana Spreng. Aristolochia macroura Gomes Aristolochia trifida Lam. Howardia surinamensis (Willd.) HowardiaKlotzsch trifida (Lam.) Klotzsch Howardia trilobata (L.) Klotzsch Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 2 Mar 2017 WRA Score: 3.0 Designation: EVALUATE Rating: Evaluate Keywords: Tropical, Vine, Shade-Tolerant, Unarmed, Gravity-Dispersed Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 n 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals 405 Toxic to animals 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens Creation Date: 2 Mar 2017 (Aristolochia trilobata L.) Page 1 of 17 TAXON: Aristolochia trilobata L.
    [Show full text]
  • QFC Fauna Report
    Fauna Habitat Assessment and EVR Investigations Proposed Alignment for Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 Palmwoods to Yandina Report Prepared for Southern Regional Water Pipeline Alliance Fauna Habitat Assessment and EVR Species Investigations Proposed Alignment for Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 Palmwoods to Yandina 21/03/2008 Date 21/03/08 Title Fauna Habitat Assessment and EVR Investigation. Proposed Alignment for Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 Palmwoods to Yandina. Author/s Bryan Robinson Status Final Report Filed as Northern Pipeline Interconnector EVR Fauna and Habitat Assessment Stage 2 Report 0801 The contents of this report and its appendices may not be used in any form by any party other than the Client. The reproduction, adaptation, use or communication of the information contained within this report may not be used without the written permission of Queensland Fauna Consultancy Pty Ltd. Neither the author/s nor the company (QFC Pty Ltd) accepts any liability or responsibility for the unauthorised use of any part of this document. Queensland Fauna Consultancy Pty Ltd. Page ii Report number 0801 Final Report Fauna Habitat Assessment and EVR Species Investigations Proposed Alignment for Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 Palmwoods to Yandina 21/03/2008 CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 1 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 3
    [Show full text]
  • Aristolochic Acids Tract Urothelial Cancer Had an Unusually High Incidence of Urinary- Bladder Urothelial Cancer
    Report on Carcinogens, Fourteenth Edition For Table of Contents, see home page: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/roc Aristolochic Acids tract urothelial cancer had an unusually high incidence of urinary- bladder urothelial cancer. CAS No.: none assigned Additional case reports and clinical investigations of urothelial Known to be human carcinogens cancer in AAN patients outside of Belgium support the conclusion that aristolochic acids are carcinogenic (NTP 2008). The clinical stud- First listed in the Twelfth Report on Carcinogens (2011) ies found significantly increased risks of transitional-cell carcinoma Carcinogenicity of the urinary bladder and upper urinary tract among Chinese renal- transplant or dialysis patients who had consumed Chinese herbs or Aristolochic acids are known to be human carcinogens based on drugs containing aristolochic acids, using non-exposed patients as sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity from studies in humans and the reference population (Li et al. 2005, 2008). supporting data on mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Evidence of car- Molecular studies suggest that exposure to aristolochic acids is cinogenicity from studies in experimental animals supports the find- also a risk factor for Balkan endemic nephropathy (BEN) and up- ings in humans. per-urinary-tract urothelial cancer associated with BEN (Grollman et al. 2007). BEN is a chronic tubulointerstitial disease of the kidney, Cancer Studies in Humans endemic to Serbia, Bosnia, Croatia, Bulgaria, and Romania, that has The evidence for carcinogenicity in humans is based on (1) findings morphology and clinical features similar to those of AAN. It has been of high rates of urothelial cancer, primarily of the upper urinary tract, suggested that exposure to aristolochic acids results from consump- among individuals with renal disease who had consumed botanical tion of wheat contaminated with seeds of Aristolochia clematitis (Ivic products containing aristolochic acids and (2) mechanistic studies 1970, Hranjec et al.
    [Show full text]