Mistletoes in Wellington Conservancy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Toward a Resolution of Campanulid Phylogeny, with Special Reference to the Placement of Dipsacales
TAXON 57 (1) • February 2008: 53–65 Winkworth & al. • Campanulid phylogeny MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS Toward a resolution of Campanulid phylogeny, with special reference to the placement of Dipsacales Richard C. Winkworth1,2, Johannes Lundberg3 & Michael J. Donoghue4 1 Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 11461–CEP 05422-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. [email protected] (author for correspondence) 2 Current address: School of Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Sciences, University of the South Pacific, Private Bag, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji 3 Department of Phanerogamic Botany, The Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208106, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8106, U.S.A. Broad-scale phylogenetic analyses of the angiosperms and of the Asteridae have failed to confidently resolve relationships among the major lineages of the campanulid Asteridae (i.e., the euasterid II of APG II, 2003). To address this problem we assembled presently available sequences for a core set of 50 taxa, representing the diver- sity of the four largest lineages (Apiales, Aquifoliales, Asterales, Dipsacales) as well as the smaller “unplaced” groups (e.g., Bruniaceae, Paracryphiaceae, Columelliaceae). We constructed four data matrices for phylogenetic analysis: a chloroplast coding matrix (atpB, matK, ndhF, rbcL), a chloroplast non-coding matrix (rps16 intron, trnT-F region, trnV-atpE IGS), a combined chloroplast dataset (all seven chloroplast regions), and a combined genome matrix (seven chloroplast regions plus 18S and 26S rDNA). Bayesian analyses of these datasets using mixed substitution models produced often well-resolved and supported trees. -
"Santalales (Including Mistletoes)"
Santalales (Including Introductory article Mistletoes) Article Contents . Introduction Daniel L Nickrent, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, USA . Taxonomy and Phylogenetics . Morphology, Life Cycle and Ecology . Biogeography of Mistletoes . Importance of Mistletoes Online posting date: 15th March 2011 Mistletoes are flowering plants in the sandalwood order that produce some of their own sugars via photosynthesis (Santalales) that parasitise tree branches. They evolved to holoparasites that do not photosynthesise. Holopar- five separate times in the order and are today represented asites are thus totally dependent on their host plant for by 88 genera and nearly 1600 species. Loranthaceae nutrients. Up until recently, all members of Santalales were considered hemiparasites. Molecular phylogenetic ana- (c. 1000 species) and Viscaceae (550 species) have the lyses have shown that the holoparasite family Balano- highest species diversity. In South America Misodendrum phoraceae is part of this order (Nickrent et al., 2005; (a parasite of Nothofagus) is the first to have evolved Barkman et al., 2007), however, its relationship to other the mistletoe habit ca. 80 million years ago. The family families is yet to be determined. See also: Nutrient Amphorogynaceae is of interest because some of its Acquisition, Assimilation and Utilization; Parasitism: the members are transitional between root and stem para- Variety of Parasites sites. Many mistletoes have developed mutualistic rela- The sandalwood order is of interest from the standpoint tionships with birds that act as both pollinators and seed of the evolution of parasitism because three early diverging dispersers. Although some mistletoes are serious patho- families (comprising 12 genera and 58 species) are auto- gens of forest and commercial trees (e.g. -
New Exotic Host for the Dwarf Mistletoe Korthalsella Salicornioides
TRILEPIDEA Newsletter of the New Zealand Plant Conservation Network NO. 201 New exotic host for the dwarf mistletoe Korthalsella salicornioides August 2020 John Barkla ([email protected]) Deadline for next issue: On 16 August 2020, while walking Friday 16 September 2020 the Abel Tasman Coastal Track, I SUBMIT AN ARTICLE observed and photographed the dwarf TO THE NEWSLETTER mistletoe Korthalsella salicornioides Contributions are welcome [Viscaceae] hemiparasitic on its gorse to the newsletter at any (Ulex europaeus [Fabaceae]) host. One time. The closing date for gorse shrub was observed hosting articles for each issue is approximately the 15th of several large plants of Korthalsella each month. salicornioides (Fig. 1). Articles may be edited and used in the newsletter and/ Th e site is on gentle hill country, or on the website news page. approximately 60 metres above sea Figure 1. Korthalsella salicornioides hemiparasitic on The Network will publish level and located about halfway gorse. Abel Tasman National Park, 16 August 2020. almost any article about between Th e Anchorage and Watering Photo: John Barkla. plants and plant conservation Cove. Trackside vegetation here comprises coastal shrubland dominated by kanuka with a particular focus on the plant life of New Zealand and (Kunzea ericoides) with manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) and prickly mingimingi Oceania. (Leptocophylla juniperina subsp. juniperina) both common. Gorse is sporadically Please send news items present, occupying otherwise bare ground that may be a result of the track’s or event information to construction and maintenance. [email protected] Postal address: Korthalsella salicornioides was abundant on host kanuka growing in close proximity c/- 160 Wilton Road to the gorse shrub host. -
Heterotrophic Carbon Gain and Mineral Nutrition of the Root Hemi-Parasite Santalum Album L
128 Heterotrophic carbon gain and mineral nutrition of Santa fum album L. Heterotrophic carbon gain and mineral nutrition of the root hemi-parasite Santalum album L. in pot culture with different hosts. Andrew M. Radomiljaci.2·A, Jen A. McComb2 and JohnS. Pate3 1Present address: Department of Conservation and Land Management, CALMSharefarms Maritime Pine, Lot 1, 260 Kalamunda Road, South Guilford, 6055, Western Australia 2Division of Science, Biological Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth 6150, Western Australia 3Department of Botany, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth 6907, Western Australia Revised manuscript received 8 January 1999 Summary tices in relation to the best host species, and how to achieve This paper examines heterotrophic gain of carbon and min the highest volume and quality of sandalwood in a particular eral composition of Santalum album partnered singly in pot set of environmental circumstances. culture with three beneficial woody N,-tixing hosts and a non Our current projects, aimed at defining the best protocols for beneficial eucalypt host. Based on dry matter gains of the growth of S. album under irrigation culture in the Ord River parasite at 33 weeks, Sesbaniaformosa proved the best host region of North West Australia, have utilised a native herba followed by Acacia ampliceps and A. trachycarpa while no ceous perennial, Alternanthera nana R. Br., as a host during improvement in growth was seen with Eucalyptus pot culture with seedlings of the parasite, followed by use of camaldulensis as a host in comparison with Santalum grown various fast growing but relatively short lived species as 'in without a host. Numbers of haustoria formed by Santalum termediate hosts' once plants are transferred to the field. -
Scanned Document
UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA “JÚLIO DE MESQUITA FILHO” unesp INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS – RIO CLARO PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS (BIOLOGIA VEGETAL) DIFERENCIAÇÃO INTRAESPECÍFICA NA REPRODUÇÃO E INTERAÇÕES PLANTA-POLINIZADOR EM POPULAÇÕES NATURAIS DE TREMBLEYA LANIFLORA (MELASTOMATACEAE) Natalia Costa Soares Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Câmpus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de doutor em Ciências Biológicas (Biologia Vegetal). Natalia Costa Soares DIFERENCIAÇÃO INTRAESPECÍFICA NA REPRODUÇÃO E INTERAÇÕES PLANTA-POLINIZADOR EM POPULAÇÕES NATURAIS DE TREMBLEYA LANIFLORA (MELASTOMATACEAE) Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências do Câmpus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de doutor em Ciências Biológicas (Biologia Vegetal). Orientador (a): Prof. Dr. Leonor Patrícia Cerdeira Morellato Co-orientador: Prof. Dr. Marcio Silva Araújo RIO CLARO 2017 581.5 Soares, Natalia Costa S676d Diferenciação intraespecífica na reprodução e interações planta-polinizador em populações naturais de Trembleya laniflora (melastomataceae) / Natalia Costa Soares. - Rio Claro, 2017 134 f. : il., figs., gráfs., tabs., fots. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências de Rio Claro Orientadora: Leonor Patrícia Cerdeira Morellato Coorientador: Marcio Silva Araújo 1. Ecologia vegetal. 2. Interações planta-animal. 3. Interações planta-polinizador. I. Título. Ficha Catalográfica -
Arachnid Ecology in New Zealand, Exploring
1 Arachnid ecology in New Zealand, exploring 2 unknown and poorly understood factors. 3 James Crofts-Bennett. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 “A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the degree of Master of Science [1] in Botany [2] at the 21 University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand” 22 2020 23 1 24 Index 25 26 Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………5. 27 Chapter 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………...7. 28 1.1 The importance of spiders………………………………………………………...7. 29 1.2 The influence of habitat structural complexity on spider distribution and 30 abundance…………………………………………………………………………......8. 31 1.3 Invasive rodents in the context of New Zealand Araneae………………………...9. 32 1.4 Thesis structure and aims………………………………………………………..14. 33 Chapter 2. The effect of habitat structural complexity on spider abundance and diversity..15. 34 2.1 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………..15. 35 Figure 2.1: Seasonal deciduous vegetation cover…………………………...16. 36 Figure 2.2: Seasonal deciduous vegetation cover with mistletoe parasites…16. 37 2.2 Methods…………………………………………………………………………17. 38 Figure 2.3: Examples of foliage samples……………………………………18. 39 Table 2.1: Sampling locations, dates and host data…………………………19. 40 2.2.1 Statistical Analyses……………………………………………………………20. 41 2.3 Results…………………………………………………………………………...20. 42 Figure 2.4: Total invertebrates sampled in summer, plotted………………..22. 43 Figure 2.5: Total invertebrates sampled in winter, plotted………………….23. 44 Table 2.2: Paired t-tests of host plant invertebrate populations……………..25. 45 2.4 Discussion……………………………………………………………………….26. 46 Chapter 3. A novel non-kill Araneae trap: test with regards to vegetation type versus 47 location 48 effects………………………………………………………………………………………..28. 49 3.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………...28. -
1999 New Zealand Botanical Society
NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 57 SEPTEMBER 1999 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Jessica Beever Secretary/Treasurer: Anthony Wright Committee: Bruce Clarkson, Colin Webb, Carol West Address: c/- Canterbury Museum Rolleston Avenue CHRISTCHURCH 8001 NEW ZEALAND Subscriptions The I999 ordinary and institutional subs are $18 (reduced to $15 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 1999 student sub, available to full-time students, is $9 (reduced to $7 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 46 (December 1996), $3.00 each from Number 47 (March 1997) to Number 50 (December 1997), and $3.75 each from Number 51 (March 1998) onwards. Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28 February of each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next year's subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the December 1999 issue (Number 58) is 26 November 1999. Please forward contributions to: Dr Carol J. West, c/- Department of Conservation PO Box 743 Invercargill Contributions may be provided on an IBM compatible floppy disc (Word) or by e-mail to [email protected] Cover Illustration Plagiochila ramosissima with antheridial branches. -
Peraxilla Colensoi
Peraxilla colensoi COMMON NAME Scarlet mistletoe, korukoru, pirita, roeroe SYNONYMS Elytranthe colensoi (Hook.f.) Engl. Loranthus colensoi Hook. f. FAMILY Loranthaceae AUTHORITY Peraxilla colensoi (Hook.f.) Tiegh. FLORA CATEGORY Vascular – Native ENDEMIC TAXON Yes ENDEMIC GENUS Yes Peraxilla colensoi, Catlins. Photographer: John Barkla ENDEMIC FAMILY No STRUCTURAL CLASS Trees & Shrubs - Dicotyledons NVS CODE PERCOL CHROMOSOME NUMBER 2n= 24 CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS 2012 | At Risk – Declining | Qualifiers: CD PREVIOUS CONSERVATION STATUSES 2009 | At Risk – Declining | Qualifiers: CD 2004 | Gradual Decline BRIEF DESCRIPTION Fleshy shrub to 3m wide growing on outer branches of beech trees with glossy green fleshy paired leaves and masses of red tubular flowers. Leaves to 8cm long, smooth with a red edge. Flowers to 2.5cm long. Fallen petals litter forest floor under plants. Fruit yellow. Photographer: Brian Molloy DISTRIBUTION North and South Island, but common only in southern parts of the South Island. HABITAT A parasite mainly found in silver beech forest but has been recorded on 16 host species (9 exotic) in New Zealand including red beech and black beech. Tui (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae) and bellbird (Anthonis melanura) disperse this species in the North Island. FEATURES A shrub up to 3 m across. It parasitises further out on branches of its host than Peraxilla tetrapetala. The veins on leaves are hardly evident and only the midrib is conspicuous. Leaf tips are never notched and the leaves themselves are large and never blistered. The leaves sit in pairs on opposite sides of the stem and are thick and have a leathery texture. Leaf margins are usually smooth with red slightly rough margins. -
Explosive New Zealand Mistletoe Example, 4 of 7 Flowers on Sheet AK103910)
SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE pattern, as do herbarium sheets (for Explosive New Zealand mistletoe example, 4 of 7 flowers on sheet AK103910). Trilepidea almost certainly SIR- Many flowers of the mistletoe arium sheets show an even more special had more complex explosive flowers than Peraxilla tetrapetala (Loranthaceae) in New ized explosive mechanism than in Peraxilla. Peraxilla. Such specialization may have Zealand open from the bottom (f in the We discovered explosive flower opening rendered Trilepidea more sensitive to figure) rather than the top (d); Kuijtl called in both endemic New Zealand Peraxilla reduced bird densities due to introduced this an "unsolved mystery ... we cannot species when we noted that flower buds mammalian predators, contributing to its even guess at the meaning of this bizarre bagged for hand pollination almost never rapid and puzzling5 decline. performance." Here we report that flower opened (3/394 for P. tetrapetala, 1/82 for P. Explosive flower opening is well known buds of P. tetrapetala and P. colensoi open colensoi). The petals remained fused at the in other mistletoes6, including many of from the top only when twisted by top, while eventually undergoing abscis the 230 species in Africa3, and a few a bird, a form of 'explosive' flower open sion from their base (fin the figure). Field species in India7, Java, New Guinea and ing common in Africa but previously observations of unbagged flowers revealed South America1•6. However, this is the unknown in Australasia. Kuijt's "bizarre that they were opened by two native first report from Australasia. The New performance" is simply the consequence of honeyeaters (Meliphagidae ): tuis (Pros Zealand flora generally displays few flowers not being visited by birds. -
Key Native Ecosystem Plan for Raroa-Pukerua Coast 2018-2021
Key Native Ecosystem Plan for Raroa-Pukerua Coast 2018-2021 Contents 1. Key Native Ecosystem plans 1 2. Raroa - Pukerua Coast Key Native Ecosystem site 2 3. Parties involved 2 4. Ecological values 3 5. Key threats to ecological values at the site 6 6. Objectives 8 7. Operational activities 8 8. Operational delivery schedule 10 9. Funding summary 11 Appendix 1: Site maps 12 Appendix 2: Threatened species list 17 Appendix 3: Regionally threatened plant species list 19 Appendix 4: Ecological Weeds 20 References 25 Raroa - Pukerua Coast 1. Key Native Ecosystem plans The Wellington region’s native biodiversity has declined since people arrived and the ecosystems that support it face ongoing threats and pressures. Regional councils have responsibility for maintaining indigenous biodiversity, as well as protecting significant vegetation and habitats of threatened species, under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). Greater Wellington Regional Council’s (Greater Wellington) Biodiversity Strategy1 sets a framework that guides how Greater Wellington protects and manages biodiversity in the Wellington region to work towards the vision below. Greater Wellington’s vision for biodiversity Healthy ecosystems thrive in the Wellington region and provide habitat for native biodiversity The Strategy provides a common focus across the council’s departments and guides activities relating to biodiversity. The vision is underpinned by four operating principles and three strategic goals. Goal One drives the delivery of the Key Native Ecosystem (KNE) Programme. Goal One Areas of high biodiversity value are protected or restored The KNE Programme is a non-regulatory voluntary programme that seeks to protect some of the best examples of original (pre-human) ecosystem types in the Wellington region by managing, reducing, or removing threats to their ecological values. -
Indigenous Plant Naming and Experimentation Reveal a Plant–Insect Relationship in New Zealand Forests
Received: 23 February 2020 Revised: 10 August 2020 Accepted: 25 August 2020 DOI: 10.1111/csp2.282 CONTRIBUTED PAPER Indigenous plant naming and experimentation reveal a plant–insect relationship in New Zealand forests Priscilla M. Wehi1,2 | Gretchen Brownstein2 | Mary Morgan-Richards1 1School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, Abstract New Zealand Drawing from both Indigenous and “Western” scientific knowledge offers the 2Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, opportunity to better incorporate ecological systems knowledge into conserva- Dunedin, New Zealand tion science. Here, we demonstrate a “two-eyed” approach that weaves Indige- Correspondence nous ecological knowledge (IK) with experimental data to provide detailed and Priscilla M. Wehi, Manaaki Whenua comprehensive information about regional plant–insect interactions in Landcare Research, 764 Cumberland New Zealand forests. We first examined Maori names for a common forest Street, Dunedin 9053, New Zealand. Email: [email protected], tree, Carpodetus serratus, that suggest a close species interaction between an [email protected] herbivorous, hole-dwelling insect, and host trees. We detected consistent – Funding information regional variation in both Maori names for C. serratus and the plant insect Foundation for Research, Science and relationship that reflect Hemideina spp. abundances, mediated by the presence Technology; Royal Society of New Zealand of a wood-boring moth species. We found that in regions with moths C. serratus trees are home to more weta than adjacent forest species and that these weta readily ate C. serratus leaves, fruits and seeds. These findings con- firm that a joint IK—experimental approach can stimulate new hypotheses and reveal spatially important ecological patterns. -
NEWSLETTER No
Waikato Botanical Society Inc. NEWSLETTER No. 37, November 2013 President Paula Reeves Ph 021 267 5802 [email protected] Secretary Kerry Jones Ph 07 855 9700 / 027 747 0733 [email protected] For all correspondence: Waikato Botanical Society Treasurer The University of Waikato Mike Clearwater C/o- Department of Biological Sciences Ph 07 838 4613 / 021 203 2902 Private Bag 3105 [email protected] HAMILTON Email: [email protected] Newsletter Editor Website: http://waikatobotsoc.org.nz/ Susan Emmitt Ph 027 408 4374 [email protected] Editors note I have just taken on the role of newsletter editor and there is a lot that has happened since the last newsletter in March. I have recently been helping out at the National Wetland Centre at Rotopiko/ Lake Serpentine near Ohaupo, where there is a lot of exciting things happening right now, and there are lots of ways to be involved with this project for those that are interested, so this newsletter has a section on volunteer opportunities as it seems people with botanical skills are always needed. If other members know of projects that botanical society members might want to get involved with, they are welcome to advertise in the next newsletter. Next years’ trip programme is in this newsletter, however details will be added closer to the time for some trips. Hopefully we will also be able to have a number of talks in 2014 like we did this year, thanks to Cynthia for organising these!! I hope you all have a happy and safe Christmas and New Year!! Happy botanising! Susan Index AGM minutes……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….2 Plant profile………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 News…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Field trip reports…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..7 Field trip programme 2014…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………20 1 nd AGM minutes – 22 April 2013 Minute Taker : Kerry Jones.