Donegal County Council The SEED Project -Stranorlar, County Flood Risk Assessment

www.tobin.ie

The SEED Project Ballybofey-Stranorlar, Flood Risk Assessment

Document Control Sheet Document Reference 10973 – FRA for The SEED Project Ballybofey-Stranorlar – Rev A Report Status For Issue Report Date September 2020 Current Revision A Client: Client Address: , County Donegal, Ireland Project Number 10973

Galway Office Dublin Office Castlebar Office Fairgreen House, Block 10-4, Market Square, Fairgreen Road, Blanchardstown Corporate Park, Castlebar, Galway, Dublin 15, Mayo, H91 AXK8, D15 X98N, F23 Y427, Ireland Ireland Ireland

Tel: +353 (0)91 565 211 Tel: +353 (0)1 803 0406 Tel: +353 (0)94 902 1401

Reviewed Authorised Revision Description Author: Date Date Date By: by: A First Issue DH/CK 10/09/2020 BD 11/09/2020 BD 11/09/2020

TOBIN Consulting Engineers

Disclaimer This Document is Copyright of TOBIN Consulting Engineers Limited. This document and its contents have been prepared for the sole use of our Client. No liability is accepted by TOBIN Consulting Engineers Limited for the use of this report, or its contents for any other use than for which it was prepared.

Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction ...... 1 2.0 Appraisal of Current Planning Policies and available information on Flood Risk Management ...... 2 2.1 The Planning System and Flood Risk Management Guidelines ...... 2 2.2 The Flood Risk Management Climate Change Adaptation Plan ...... 4 2.3 Donegal County Development Plan 2018-2024 ...... 5 2.4 Seven Strategic Towns Local Area Plan 2018-2024 ...... 6 2.5 Historical Flood Events...... 8 2.6 Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management Study ...... 9 2.7 Ballybofey - Stranorlar Flood Relief Scheme ...... 10 2.8 Geological Survey Ireland Mapping ...... 10 3.0 DETAILED FLOOD RISK ASESSMENT ...... 11 3.1 Fluvial Flooding...... 11 3.2 Pluvial Flooding ...... 11 3.3 Groundwater Flooding ...... 11 3.4 Coastal Flooding ...... 11 3.5 Assessment of ‘minor proposal’ in areas of flood risk ...... 12 4.0 CONCLUSIONS ...... 14

Table of Figures

Figure 1-1 Location of the Proposed Development Sites ...... 1 Figure 2-1 Ballybofey-Stranorlar Flood and Land Use Zoning (extract from LAP) 6 Figure 2-2 Ballybofey-Stranorlar Flood Indicator Map (extract from SFRA) 7 Figure 2-3 OPW Past Flood Event Mapping ...... 8 Figure 2-4 CFRAM Fluvial Flood Mapping (current scenario, excluding climate change) ...... 9 Figure 2-5 CFRAM Fluvial Flood Mapping ...... 10

- i -

Table of Tables

Table 2-1 Decision Matrix for Determining the Appropriateness of a Development ...... 2 Table 2-2 Climate Change Adaptation Allowances for Future Flood Risk Scenarios ...... 4

Appendices

Appendix 1 - Drawings

- ii -

1.0 INTRODUCTION

TOBIN Consulting Engineers were appointed by Donegal County Council to carry out a Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) to support the Part VIII planning application that will be submitted for the proposed Ballybofey-Stranorlar town centre regeneration project, i.e., The SEED Project.

This FRA is specific to the proposed development sites in Ballybofey, shown in Figure 1-1, which comprise the currently vacant ‘RITZ’ building, a portion of the existing car park on Main Street and a brownfield site on Chestnut Road.

The proposed public realm scheme involves the following: 1. Construction of a contemporary extension on the footprint of the currently vacant ‘RITZ’ building while retaining its architecturally significant façade. 2. Replacement of the existing car park on Main Street with civic space comprising a playground, seating area, and water feature. 3. Construction of a multi-storey car park on the brownfield site on Chestnut Road.

The existing site layout and proposed public realm scheme are provided in Appendix 1.

The purpose of this report is to communicate any potential flood risks, from various sources, to the proposed future developments and to the people using the space.

Due to the proximity of the River Finn to the subject site, fluvial flooding was considered as a potential source of risk to the development.

Ballybofey Town Centre

Figure 1-1 Location of the Proposed Development Sites

1

2.0 APPRAISAL OF CURRENT PLANNING POLICIES AND AVAILABLE INFORMATION ON FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT

This Flood Risk Assessment was carried out in accordance with the following flood risk management guidance documents: • The Planning System and Flood Risk Management Guidelines • Flood Risk Management Climate Change Sectoral Adaptation Plan • Donegal County Development Plan 2018-2024 • Seven Strategic Towns Local Area Plan (Ballybofey-Stranorlar) 2018-2024

An appraisal of the following was also carried out: • Historical Flood Events • Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management (CFRAM Study) • Ballybofey-Stranorlar Flood Relief Scheme • Mapping by the Geological Survey of Ireland

2.1 The Planning System and Flood Risk Management Guidelines

The Planning System and Flood Risk Management (PSFRM) Guidelines (OPW/DEHLG, 2009) discuss flood risk in terms of Flood Zones A, B, and C, which correspond to areas of high, medium, or low probability of flooding, respectively. The extents of each flood zone are based on the Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) of fluvial and coastal flood events.

The PSFRM Guidelines also categorise different types of development into three vulnerability classes based on their sensitivity to flooding.

Table 2-1 shows a decision matrix that indicates which types of development are appropriate in each flood zone and when the Justification Test must be. The AEPs used to define each flood zone are also provided.

Table 2-1 Decision Matrix for Determining the Appropriateness of a Development Flood Zone Development Appropriateness Annual Exceedance Probability (Probability of Highly Less Water (AEP) flooding) Vulnerable Vulnerable Compatible A Fluvial & Pluvial Flooding Justification Justification Appropriate (High) More frequent than 1% AEP Test Test B Fluvial & Pluvial Flooding Justification Appropriate Appropriate (Medium) 0.1% to 1% AEP Test C Fluvial & Pluvial Flooding Appropriate Appropriate Appropriate (Low) Less frequent than 0.1% AEP Note: Given that coastal flooding is not a potential source of risk to the proposed development, the probabilities for coastal flooding have been omitted from this table.

With reference to table 3.1 of the PSFRM Guidelines, amenity open space and car parking facilities are classified as “water compatible”.

The guidelines classify buildings used for leisure/commercial (i.e. the Ritz building) as “less vulnerable” in terms of their sensitivity to flooding. New developments of this type would typically be assessed against a 1% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) flood event. However,

2

Section 5.28 of the PSFRM Guidelines notes the following in relation to the assessment of “minor proposals” in areas of potential flood risk:

“Applications for minor development, such as small extensions to houses, and most changes of use of existing buildings and or extensions and additions to existing commercial and industrial enterprises, are unlikely to raise significant flooding issues, unless they obstruct important flow paths, introduce a significant additional number of people into flood risk areas or entail the storage of hazardous substances. Since such applications concern existing buildings, the sequential approach cannot be used to locate them in lower-risk areas and the Justification Test will not apply. However, a commensurate assessment of the risks of flooding should accompany such applications to demonstrate that they would not have adverse impacts or impede access to a watercourse, floodplain or flood protection and management facilities. These proposals should follow best practice in the management of health and safety for users and residents of the proposal.”

On this basis, the works proposed as part of the SEED project are considered a minor proposal and the Justification Test is not applicable. The proposed upgrades must therefore be assessed against the following criteria if the site is found to be in a 1% AEP flood zone:

(1) Effect of the development on flood risk elsewhere: a. Impact on flow paths b. Impact on floodplain storage (2) Effect of development on flood risk for people using the site: a. Impact on flood levels at the site b. Increase in number of people using the site c. Safe access/egress for people to/from the site d. Safe access/egress for emergency vehicles to/from the site (3) Effect of development on access to the adjacent watercourse for maintenance or potential future flood alleviation works (4) Storage of hazardous substances

These items are assessed in detail in Section 3.5of this report.

3

2.2 The Flood Risk Management Climate Change Adaptation Plan

The Flood Risk Management Climate Change Sectoral Adaptation Plan (OPW, 2019) outlines the OPW’s approach to climate change adaptation in terms of flood risk management.

This approach is based on a current understanding of the potential impacts of climate change on flooding and flood risk. Research has shown that climate change is likely to worsen flooding through more extreme rainfall patterns, more severe river flows, and rising mean sea levels.

When assessing flood risk, the Adaptation Plan recommends two future flood risk scenarios that consider the implications of factors, such as climate change, in relation to future flooding: • Mid-Range Future Scenario (MRFS) • High-End Future Scenario (HEFS)

Table 2-2 indicates the allowances that should be added to estimates of extreme rainfall depths, peak flood flows, and mean sea levels for the future scenarios.

Table 2-2 Climate Change Adaptation Allowances for Future Flood Risk Scenarios Mid-Range Future Scenario High-End Future Scenario Parameter (MRFS) (HEFS) Extreme Rainfall Depths + 20% + 30% Peak River Flood Flows + 20% + 30% Mean Sea Level Rise + 0.5 m + 1 m

For the purpose of this FRA, the proposed development shall be assessed against the Mid-Range Future Scenario (MRFS) as it represents what the OPW call a “likely” future scenario.

4

2.3 Donegal County Development Plan 2018-2024

Section 5.4 of the Donegal County Development Plan sets out the following objectives (F-O-#) and policies (P-F-#) related to flood risk management:

F-O-1: To assess all development proposals in accordance with ‘The Planning System and Flood Risk Management - Guidelines for Planning Authorities’, (DoEHLG, 2009). F-O-2: To adopt a sequential approach to flood risk management when assessing the location for new development based on avoidance, substitution, justification, and mitigation of flood risk. F-O-3 To ensure that the requirements of EU and national law in relation to the natural environment and nature conservation are complied with at all stages of flood risk management and to comply with Articles 6 of the Habitats Directive and have regard to the relevant conservation objectives, qualifying interest and threats to the integrity of Natura 2000 site. F-P-1 It is a policy of the Council to ensure that all development proposals comply with ‘The Planning System and Flood Risk Management - Guidelines for Planning Authorities’, November 2009, DoEHLG. In doing so the planning authority shall: • Assess developments in accordance with the Sequential approach and precautionary principle set out the in the Planning System and Flood Risk Management - Guidelines for Planning Authorities’; and • Utilise the Draft Flood Risk Management Plans (and any associated flood risk mapping) prepared as part of the CFRAMS programme, or any other flood risk datasets or mapping it considers appropriate, in assessing flood risk. F-P-2 It is a policy of the Council to require applicants/developers to submit, where appropriate, an independent ‘Flood Risk Assessment’ in accordance with the Flood Risk Management Guidelines, DEHLG, 2009 or any subsequent related publication and/or ‘Surface Water Drainage Calculations’, from suitably qualified persons. F-P-3 It is a policy of the Council to require applicants/developers to submit, where appropriate, evidence of compliance with the Justification test set out in S5.15 of The Planning System and Flood Risk Management - Guidelines for Planning Authorities’ (DoEHLG 2009) or any subsequent related publication. F-P-4 It is a policy of the Council not to permit development where flood or surface water management issues have not been, or cannot be, addressed successfully and/or where the presence of unacceptable residual flood risks remain for the development, its occupants and/or property or public infrastructure elsewhere including, inter alia, up or downstream. F-P-5 It is a policy of the Council to promote the use of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDs), flood attenuation areas, the controlled release of surface waters and use of open spaces and semi permeable hard surfaces for appropriate development proposals. F-P-6 It is a policy of the Council to consider the development of long and short-term flood remediation works, including embankments, sea defences, drainage channels, and attenuation ponds to alleviate flood risk and damage to livelihoods, property and business subject to environmental considerations including potential impact on designated shellfish water and, fresh water pearl mussel catchment areas, compliance with Article 6 of the Habitats Directive, best practice in Coastal Zone Management and the Marine Resource and Coastal Management policies of this Plan. F-P-7 It is a policy of the Council not to permit developments which would hinder the maintenance of river or drainage channels.

5

2.4 Seven Strategic Towns Local Area Plan 2018-2024

Ballybofey-Stranorlar is one of the seven towns included in Donegal County Council’s 2018- 2024 Strategic Towns Local Area Plan (LAP). A Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) for the seven towns was undertaken by TOBIN in 2018 to support the LAP.

The SFRA flood mapping (Figure 2-1) shows the proposed development located within Flood Zone A; at risk from flooding during a 1% AEP event. It should be noted that in accordance with the PSFRM guidelines, the SFRA flood zone mapping considers an undefended scenario.

The actual risk of flooding is reduced due to the flood protection afforded by the existing clay embankments on the River Finn. The predicted extents of flooding including the flood defences is shown in Figure 2-2.

(1% AEP, includes residual risk)

(0.1% AEP, includes residual risk)

Subject Site (Zone A / residual flood risk)

Figure 2-1 Ballybofey-Stranorlar Flood and Land Use Zoning (extract from LAP)

The mapping used in the SFRA was derived from the results of hydraulic modelling carried out as part of the CFRAM study (discussed further in Section 2.6).

The SFRA notes that minor flooding has been reported in the vicinity of the subject site, caused by storm sewers surcharging during flood events on the River Finn (when flap valves are closed and prevent discharge to the River).

6

Subject Site

Figure 2-2 Ballybofey-Stranorlar Flood Indicator Map (extract from SFRA)

7

2.5 Historical Flood Events

The OPW’s floodinfo.ie portal provides mapping of past flood events with corresponding reports, meeting minutes, press articles, photos, and hydrometric data.

Based on the flood hazard mapping (Figure 2-3) a number of flood events have been reported in Ballybofey-Stranorlar with records dating back to October 1965.

Figure 2-3 OPW Past Flood Event Mapping

The two most recently reported flood events in Ballybofey-Stranorlar are described in detail in the North Western River Basin Flood Risk Management Plan (OPW, 2018): • November 2015 – Widespread flooding across Donegal was reported on the 15th and 16th of November following prolonged and persistent heavy rainfall. At Ballybofey, a wall adjacent to the River Finn collapsed under the weight of the floodwater, causing flooding of Jackson’s Hotel car park. This car park is approximately 300 m from the currently vacant ‘RITZ’ building that is part of the proposed developments. • December 2015 – Only three weeks later, between the 5th and 7th of December 2015, the River Finn backed up along a tributary, flooding two mobile classrooms and a boiler room at St. Mary’s National School. Flooding was also reported in Ballybofey at the rear of the Villa Rose Hotel, adjacent to the vacant ‘RITZ’ building, and in the basement of the boxing club on Chestnut Road.

Past flood events were also reported in Ballybofey-Stranorlar in January 2012, December 2011, January 2005, October 1989, September 1985, August 1970, and October 1965.

8

2.6 Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management Study

The OPW produced a series of flood maps as part of the North Western Catchment Flood Risk Assessment and Management (CFRAM) Study1. The mapping is based on the results of hydraulic modelling of the River Finn carried out by RPS Group in 2017.

The mapping shows the subject site located in the area of land defended by the existing clay embankments on the River Finn.

The residual risk of flooding (in the event of an embankment breach/overtopping) is highlighted in the LAP SFRA (discussed in Section 2.4), with the subject lands being designated as Flood Zone A.

(Flood Zone A) (Flood Zone B) Subject Site (located in defended area)

Figure 2-4 CFRAM Fluvial Flood Mapping (current scenario, excluding climate change)

The CFRAM study indicates that the River Finn flood embankments provide protection up to the 1% AEP event.

Further hydraulic modelling was carried out as part of the CFRAM study to show the impact of climate change. The study predicts that the current embankments will be overtopped when subject to a 1% AEP Mid-Range-Future-Scenario, which includes a 20% increase in peak flood flow. See Figure 2-5.

1 floodinfo.ie

9

Existing Embankments provide protection up to 1% AEP (excluding climate change)

(MRFS):

Figure 2-5 CFRAM Fluvial Flood Mapping

2.7 Ballybofey - Stranorlar Flood Relief Scheme Donegal County Council and the OPW are currently progressing the design and development of the Ballybofey and Stranorlar Flood Relief Scheme which was announced by the Minister of State in November 2019.

The scheme will likely involve increasing the conveyance capacity of the River Finn (by channel widening) and/or the construction of hard defences (flood walls/embankments).

As the scheme is currently at proposal stage (pre-planning and pre-detailed design), any benefit which could be provided by it to the SEED project cannot be considered as part of this flood risk assessment.

2.8 Geological Survey Ireland Mapping The Geological Survey Ireland (GSI) provides mapping related to Ireland’s subsurface2. Based on GSI mapping, there are no karst landforms (caves, springs, turloughs, etc.) in close proximity to Ballybofey-Stranorlar.

2 https://www.gsi.ie/en-ie/data-and-maps/Pages/default.aspx

10

3.0 DETAILED FLOOD RISK ASESSMENT

With reference to the PSFRM guidelines discussed in Section 2.1, the proposed car-park and civic space are classified as “water compatible” in terms of their sensitivity to flooding.

While commercial buildings are typically classified as “less vulnerable” in terms of their sensitivity to flooding, the proposed extension to the existing Ritz Building is considered a “minor proposal”. The Justification Test cannot be applied to locate the building in a lower-flood risk area.

This section assesses the risk of flooding posed to the development, and the impact of the development on flood risk elsewhere.

3.1 Fluvial Flooding

The current CFRAM mapping (Figure 2-4) estimates that the subject is protected from fluvial flooding up to the 1% AEP event by the existing flood defence embankments surrounding the town.

Due to the increase in flood flows caused by climate change, it is estimated that the current defences will be overtopped during a 1% AEP Mid-Range Future Scenario. See Figure 2-5.

Given the residual risk of flooding in the town (demonstrated by an embankment breach in 2015), additional flood relief measures for Ballybofey-Stranorlar are currently being developed by Donegal County Council and the Office of Public Works.

3.2 Pluvial Flooding

Based on the pluvial modelling carried out by HR Wallingford as part of the National PFRA, it is estimated that the proposed development is not at risk from pluvial flooding. It should be noted that the PFRA study specifically did not include local drainage infrastructure or defences.

Due to the location of the subject site behind the River Finn embankments, there is a residual risk of surface water being attenuated while river levels are high. The SFRA notes that the existing sewer network surcharged in 2015 under such circumstances, resulting in minor flooding.

3.3 Groundwater Flooding

Based on GSI mapping, there are no karst features (caves, springs, turloughs, etc.) in close proximity to Ballybofey-Stranorlar. It is therefore estimated that the proposed development is not at risk from groundwater flooding.

3.4 Coastal Flooding

The proposed development is not at risk of coastal flooding due to Ballybofey’s distance inland.

11

3.5 Assessment of ‘minor proposal’ in areas of flood risk

The proposed SEED development in Ballybofey is considered a ‘minor proposal’ in the PSFRM guidelines. The ‘Justification Test’ therefore does not apply.

As the proposed development is predicted to lie within the 1% AEP MRFS flood zone, the following items have been considered, as recommended in section 5.28 of the PSFRM guidance document: 1. Effect of Development on flood risk elsewhere due to: a. Impact on flow paths b. Impact on flood plain storage 2. Effect of development on flood risk for users of development: a. Impact on flood levels on site b. Increase in number of people using site c. Safe access/egress for people to/from site d. Safe access/egress for emergency vehicles to/from site 3. Effect of development on access to watercourse for maintenance or potential future flood alleviation works 4. Storage of hazardous substances

Effect of development on flood risk elsewhere

It is estimated that the proposed works will have a minimal impact on flood plain storage. Due to its location behind the existing defences, it is predicted that the development will not impact on the flow path of the River Finn.

It is our understanding that there are pre-existing problems with the stormwater drainage network becoming surcharged as a result of high river levels. It is recommended that runoff rates from the new development be limited to greenfield rates following the principals of SUDS.

Subject to the above recommendation, it is estimated that the proposed SEED development will have an imperceptible impact on flood risk in the area.

Effect of development on flood risk for users of development

Subject to a 1% AEP MRFS event or greater, it is predicted that the ground floor of the Ritz building, the proposed car park, and the civic space will be liable to flooding.

It is recommended that the proposed Ritz building include measures to mitigate against potential flood damages. This may include the use of demountable flood barriers.

The proposed upgrade works will not increase the number of people accessing the area during a storm event.

The current situation in relation to access for people and/or emergency vehicles to/from the area will not be altered by this proposal.

Effect of development on access to watercourse for maintenance or potential future flood alleviation works

It is estimated that the proposed development works will not alter the current access to the river for channel maintenance or other works.

12

Storage of hazardous substances

The proposed development does not include proposals for the storage of hazardous substances.

The proposed development satisfies the PSFRM criteria for ‘minor proposals’ in areas of flood risk.

13

4.0 CONCLUSIONS

TOBIN Consulting Engineers were appointed by Donegal County Council to undertake a Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) for the proposed SEED development in Ballybofey Co. Donegal.

The proposed SEED development, subject of this report, includes the following: 1. Construction of a contemporary extension on the footprint of the currently vacant ‘RITZ’ building while retaining its architecturally significant front. 2. Replacement of the existing car park on Main Street with civic space comprising a playground, seating area, and water feature. 3. Construction of a multi-storey car park on the brownfield site on Chestnut Road.

Due to the proximity of the site to the River Finn, the primary source of flood risk to the development is fluvial flooding from the River Finn.

Based on previous hydraulic assessments/modelling carried out by others, the existing flood defences in the town provide a level of protection up to the current 1% AEP flood event.

Despite the residual risk of flooding (highlighted by a breach in 2015), the Justification Test cannot be applied to re-locate the existing Ritz building in a lower-risk area.

The following mitigation measures are recommended for inclusion in the development: - Limit the discharge of surface water from the site to greenfield runoff rates following the principals of SUDS - Incorporation of flood protection measures into the Ritz extension/renovation to mitigate against potential flood damages

With the incorporation of the above mitigation measures, the proposal satisfies the PSFRM criteria for ‘minor proposals in areas of flood risk’.

It is predicted the flood risk to the SEED development can be managed and it is estimated the proposal will not impact the risk of flooding elsewhere.

14

Appendix 1 - Drawings

Main Street

Butt Hall

Car Park

Ritz Building

Main Street

Car Park

Open Space Main Street Shop Units McElhinneys

Open Space

Open Space

Aldi PROJECT SCALE : 1:1000 DRAWING TITLE BALLYBOFEY / STRANORLAR DRAWN BY : S.O.D SITE LOCATION Community Development & Planning Services (THE SEED PROJECT) CHECKED BY : S.McC Station Island, Lifford, Co Donegal DRAWING NO : Tel:(074)9153900 l Fax:(074)9141793 l www.donegalcoco.ie DATE : FEBRUARY 2020 REV : L. Ward, Director of Community Development & Planning Services Ritz Existing (A Cultural Car Park

Hub) MAIN P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez.

Mh P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. seating

Mh

P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. bench water Gormley Opticians feature P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. bench bench cobbles

Bus Stop P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. seating P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez.

17.0

bench P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. H Open Space Mhs cobbles bench Bus Stop Tks

P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. bench P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. parking P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez.

sculpture P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. bench

Mh P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. Walkway play area P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez.

P. de Arq. Enrique Guerrero Hernández. Adrian A. Romero Arguelles. Francisco Espitia Ramos. Hugo Suárez Ramírez. seating area Gallaghers

Mh H Walkway

Mh

H

H Costcutters Mhs Mh

H

PROJECT SCALE : 1:250 DRAWING TITLE McElhinneysBALLYBOFEY / STRANORLAR DRAWN BY : S.O.D PROPOSED SITE LAYOUT Community Development & Planning Services (THE SEED PROJECT) CHECKED BY : S.McC Station Island, Lifford, Co Donegal DRAWING NO : Tel:(074)9153900 l Fax:(074)9141793 l www.donegalcoco.ie DATE : FEBRUARY 2020 L. Ward, Director of Community Development & Planning Services REV :

www.tobin.ie

TOBIN Consulting Engineers @tobinengineers

Galway Dublin Castlebar Fairgreen House, Block 10-4, Market Square, Fairgreen Road, Blanchardstown Corporate Park, Castlebar, Galway, Dublin 15, Mayo, H91 AXK8, D15 X98N, F23 Y427, Ireland. Ireland. Ireland. Tel: +353 (0)91 565 211 Tel: +353 (0)1 803 0406 Tel: +353 (0)94 902 1401