DOCSLIB.ORG

T R a N S C R I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
T R a N S C R I TRANSCRIPT LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL LEGAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES COMMITTEE Inquiry into the Use of Cannabis in Victoria Melbourne—Wednesday, 19 May 2021 MEMBERS Ms Fiona Patten—Chair Ms Tania Maxwell Dr Tien Kieu—Deputy Chair Mr Craig Ondarchie Ms Jane Garrett Ms Kaushaliya Vaghela Ms Wendy Lovell PARTICIPATING MEMBERS Dr Matthew Bach Mr David Limbrick Ms Melina Bath Mr Edward O’Donohue Mr Rodney Barton Mr Tim Quilty Ms Georgie Crozier Dr Samantha Ratnam Dr Catherine Cumming Ms Harriet Shing Mr Enver Erdogan Mr Lee Tarlamis Mr Stuart Grimley Ms Sheena Watt Necessary corrections to be notified to executive officer of committee Wednesday, 19 May 2021 Legislative Council Legal and Social Issues Committee 18 WITNESSES Dr Devin Bowles, Chief Executive Officer, Alcohol Tobacco and Other Drug Association ACT; and Mr Michael Pettersson, MLA, Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory (both via videoconference). The CHAIR: Thank you, everyone. Welcome back. As I am sure you are aware, we are the Legislative Council’s Legal and Social Issues Committee, and this is a public hearing into the use of cannabis in Victoria. We are very pleased to be joined by a panel from the ACT. We have Dr Devin Bowles, who is the Chief Executive Officer of the Alcohol Tobacco and Other Drug Association, and are delighted to welcome our colleague Michael Pettersson, a member of the Legislative Assembly in the ACT. Here joining me today I have David Limbrick and Sheena Watt, and I am Fiona Patten, the Chair of this committee. Just to let you know—and I am sure this will come as no surprise to you, Michael—all evidence taken today is protected by our parliamentary privilege, and that comes under our Constitution Act but also the Legislative Council’s standing orders. Therefore any information you provide during the hearing is protected by law. However, if you were to go elsewhere and repeat the same things, you may not have the same protection. Any deliberately false evidence or misleading of this committee may be considered a contempt of Parliament. As you can see, we are hanging onto your every word. We have transcribers from Hansard, and also our broadcasting team. You will receive a Hansard record of this hearing, and I would encourage you to have a quick look through it to make sure that we have not misrepresented you, because ultimately it will go up onto the committee’s website and these transcripts do form part of our report. Just to let you know, we will be reporting in the first week of August. I welcome you to make some opening remarks for the committee. We are also joined by Matthew Bach, who you hopefully can see on your screen. Thank you for joining us, Matthew. Michael or Devin, could I get some opening remarks from you before we open it up to a committee discussion. Mr PETTERSSON: Sure. I have got a short opening statement. The CHAIR: Lovely. Mr PETTERSSON: Good morning, committee. It is an absolute delight to be here with you today. It is always a bit fun seeing how other jurisdictions conduct their committee business. In 2019 I introduced the Drugs of Dependence (Personal Cannabis Use) Amendment Bill to the ACT Legislative Assembly. This Bill sought to legalise cannabis for personal use. It allows for individuals to possess up to 50 grams of cannabis for their own personal use and to grow two cannabis plants to a household limit of four. To some this may sound radical, but for most Canberrans it was not. At the time ACT government research had shown that 54 per cent of Canberrans supported legalising cannabis for personal use and only 27 per cent were opposed to the change. The majority of Canberrans were in favour of seeing our drug laws reformed, and it definitely showed in how the community debate was undertaken. I do not see cannabis law reform as a left-right issue, and I do not see it as a partisan issue either. To some it is an issue of personal freedom and liberties, and for others it is about breaking down stigmas and offering public health support in moments of crisis. And to some it is simply about reassessing the cost and effectiveness of our current laws. This is an issue that I hope many can find agreement on if they give themselves an opportunity to consider new perspectives. I want to be very clear: supporting cannabis law reform is not contingent upon having used cannabis or, for some committee members, having plans to consume it in the future. I think it is just good public policy. The Bill I introduced and then was passed by the ACT Legislative Assembly came into effect on 31 January 2020, and with it the ACT became the first jurisdiction to legalise cannabis possession. To some people’s surprise, the sky did not fall in. As time passed it became clear that the overall impact of legalisation was rather subtle and not as drastic as many had hoped. According to a wastewater analysis, cannabis usage rates remained the same upon the Bill’s passing and consistent with trends in other jurisdictions over time. Wednesday, 19 May 2021 Legislative Council Legal and Social Issues Committee 19 According to ACT police, drug driving offences have remained steady. And according to ACT Health, legalisation has not increased the number of cannabis-related hospital presentations. These are of course early numbers and very blunt measures, but they do not spell the doom that many predicted. The legal conflicts between the commonwealth and ACT laws have also proved unproblematic. No-one has been charged for unlawful possession under federal legislation, and ACT police report they have not faced any issues with implementing the new laws. Within the first year cannabis offences dropped by 90 per cent. Personal possession remains an offence for minors, and the remaining offences were due to minors being dealt with under the decriminalisation framework that still exists on the ACT’s books. For some context, before cannabis possession was legalised in ACT the last report by the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission on the 2018–19 reporting period stated that in the ACT 55 consumers of cannabis were issued a civil penalty under the decriminalisation framework and 334 consumers of cannabis were arrested. The classification of cannabis as an illicit drug is an unnecessary burden on the criminal justice system. Studies show that one in three Australians have used cannabis in their lifetime and one in 10 of us have used cannabis in the past year. Let that sink in for a moment. One-third of the Australian population are quite literally criminals liable for a prison sentence. I am not an expert on many things, but on this one I am almost certain we do not have enough room in prison for that many people. Reforming drug laws to allow possession of small amounts of cannabis is a positive policy based on harm minimisation. Time and time again research has shown that criminalisation is harmful, not helpful. Generally speaking Australia’s current approach to drug policy concentrates on the idea that drug use is a moral failing and a criminal issue. This detracts from the idea that drug use is first and foremost a health issue. There is no secret that tobacco use and alcohol consumption have serious ramifications for the health of Australians. These are both legal drugs with practically no chance of being made illegal. Tobacco and alcohol use contributed to 13.8 per cent of the total burden of disease within Australia in 2015; illicit drugs contributed 2.7 per cent of the total burden of disease, and of that 2.7 per cent, cannabis comprised only 8.3 per cent. Tobacco, alcohol and cannabis are readily available to those who want to use those substances. Anyone over 18 can go for a drink at a bar or purchase cigarettes from a local convenience store. And overwhelmingly people that want to use cannabis know how to procure it through the black market, whether that be in a public transport interchange, a nightclub bathroom or even the schoolyard. When it comes to alcohol and tobacco we recognise that prohibiting these substances is ineffective. Instead of criminalising these drugs, we have other measures in place to reduce the societal and health-related harms that they cause. I want to be very clear: I know that there are adverse health effects associated with cannabis use. Cannabis is inherently dangerous. We know that it can have a negative impact on the mental health of those who have pre-existing mental health conditions or those who are genetically predisposed to have one. But when you compare the health effects of other legal drugs, the argument against legalisation based on the supposed health concerns just does not make sense. In closing, I think it is very early days for the ACT, but the early signs are positive, and I look forward to answering the committee’s questions. The CHAIR: Thank you. Thanks very much, Michael. Devin, would you like to make some opening comments? Dr BOWLES: I would love to. Thank you for the invitation to speak to you today about Canberra’s experience in partially legalising cannabis possession. I am afraid I may repay your kind invitation with testimony that is anticlimactic at best, because the story is that we found that cannabis use has not changed, and that is important because there were some really dire predictions at the outset. But while the sky has not fallen in, people who need access to treatment are better able to achieve that access and the taxpayer is saving money.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Letter on Proposed Motorcycle Lane Filtering Trial
    www.tinyurl/WalkACT Mr Simon Corbell, Attorney-General and Minister for Police and Emergency Services Mr Alistair Coe, Shadow Minister for Transport Mr Shane Rattenbury, Minister for Urban Services Mr Jeremy Hanson, Shadow Minister for Police and Shadow Attorney-General Proposed Motorcycle Lane Filtering Trial Dear Messrs Corbell, Coe, Rattenbury and Hanson Before changing our laws to facilitate the proposed Motorcycle Lane Filtering Trial, please ensure that the following issues are adequately addressed: SAFETY ISSUES .............................................................................................................. 2 Safe maximum speed for lane filtering ......................................................................... 2 Sight-lines between motorcyclists and pedestrians ....................................................... 2 LEGAL ISSUES ................................................................................................................ 2 Will lane filtering above a certain speed be made illegal? ........................................... 2 Must lane-filtering motorcyclists give way to road-crossing pedestrians? ................... 2 Will lane filtering be prohibited in high pedestrian 40 km/h shopping centre zones? . 3 Will three-wheeled motorcycles be permitted to lane filter? ........................................ 3 ENFORCEMENT ISSUES ............................................................................................... 4 Are existing lane filtering laws enforced? ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Election Report and the Recommendations Contained Within It Comprise the Forma L Submission by the ACT Electora L Commission to the Inquiry
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY STANDING COMMITTEE ON JUSTICE AND COMMUNITY SAFETY Mr Jeremy Hanson MLA (Chair), Dr Marisa Paterson (Deputy Chair) , Ms Jo Clay MLA Submission Cover Sheet Inquiry into 2020 ACT Election and the Electoral Act Submission Number : 008 Date Authorised for Publication : 5 May 2021 ACT ElECTORAl COMMl$SION Ol'ACERS 11'.1i!1 1§Elections ACT O F TH E ACT LEG IS LA TI V E ASSEMBLY liill Mr Jeremy Hanson CSC MLA Chair, Standing Committee on Justice and Community Safety GPO Box 1020 CANBERRA ACT 2601 cc: [email protected] .ay Dear Mr Hanson Inquiry into 2020 ACT Election and the Electoral Act - Submission by the ACT Electoral Commission As you may be aware, the Speaker tabled the ACT Electoral Commission's Report on the ACT Legislative Assembly Election 2020 in the ACT Leg islative Assembly on Friday 23 April 2021. I am writing to advise you as Chair of the Inquiry into the 2020 ACT Election and the Electoral Act that the subject election report and the recommendations contained within it comprise the forma l submission by the ACT Electora l Commission to the Inquiry. In addition to providing a comprehensive report on the conduct of the election, the report makes recommendations for consideration of changes to electora l legislation and notes other areas for improvements. The report should be read in conjunction with the Election statistics from the 2020 ACT Legislative Assembly published on the Elections ACT website in December 2020. The Commission looks forward to the conduct of the Inquiry and the Committee's Discussion Paper in due course, in continuous improvement to the delivery of electoral services to the ACT community.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 ACT Election Capad Candidate Statements: Analysis at a Glance
    2016 ACT Election CAPaD Candidate Statements: analysis at a glance In 2016 CAPaD invited the candidates for the ACT election to introduce themselves to the electorate and to say why they felt they were suitable for the job of representing us in the Legislative Assembly. We hope you find this summary of the responses by those who were elected, about their perceived relationship with voters, informative. Conclusion In brief our MLAs understandably take a very traditional view of their representative relationship with voters. They are very much about being available for one-on-one interactions out and about on the hustings and by standard correspondence or email. There was some interest in social media but little interest in traditional media. Structured opportunities to meet constituents were also favoured. MLA initiated methods scored low. Interest in promoting or engaging through deliberative and participatory methods was mentioned by six of the MLAs. More detail follows. Response rates Overall: 62 of the 141 (44%) candidates submitted statements By success in being elected 14/25 (56%) of successful and 48/116 (41%) of the unsuccessful candidates By being elected by Party affiliation ALP: 25 candidates, 13 (52%) submitted statements; 7 (28% of all candidates and 54% of those who submitted statements) elected Liberal Party, 25 candidates, 10 (48%) submitted statements; 5 (20% of all candidates and 50% of those who submitted statements) elected The Greens, 15 candidates 13 (67%) submitted statements; of those 2 (13% of all candidates and
    [Show full text]
  • The ACT Election 2016: Back to the Future?
    The ACT election 2016: back to the future? Terry Giesecke 17 February 2017 DOI: 10.4225/50/58a623512b6e6 Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this paper are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the view of APO. Copyright/Creative commons license: Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 (CC BY-NC 3.0 AU) 12 pages Overview This resource is a summary of the outcome of the ACT election, held in October 2016. It was an unusual election, in that it saw little movement in party support from the previous election in 2012 and no fringe parties or candidates were elected. The main issues were the construction of a tramline, the implementation of tax reform, the demolition of over one thousand houses to resolve asbestos contamination and allegations of corruption. The ACT Election 2016: Back to the future? The ACT election on October 15 was more of a 1950s or 1960s election. In that era little movement occurred from one election to the next. In 1967 political scientist Don Aitkin wrote, “Most Australians have a basic commitment to one or other of the major parties, and very few change their mind from one election to the other”1. Not so today. In the last few years Australia has experienced three one term State/Territory Governments, huge swings from election to election and the rapid rise and fall of new parties. So why was the ACT different? The ACT election saw a swing of 0.5 per cent against the governing ALP and their partner the Greens and a 2.2 per cent swing against the opposition Liberals.
    [Show full text]
  • WCCC Letterhead Aug 2006
    www.wccc.com.au [email protected] PO Box 3701 Weston Creek ACT 2611 Telephone (02) 6288 8975 Minutes of the General Meeting “Meet the Candidates” Wednesday, 26 September 2012 1. Opening of Meeting The meeting was opened at 7.35pm by Acting Chair Pat McGinn. Pat welcomed members and a number of guests: Louise Maher, from the ABC, Moderator for the meeting; and eight candidates for the ACT elections: Katy Gallagher, Angie Drake, Mark Kulasingham (ALP); Jeremy Hanson, Tom Sefton (Liberal Party); Shane Rattenbury, Caroline Le Couteur, Alan Kerlin (Greens). Approximately sixty persons attended the meeting. 2. Introduction of Candidates Pat McGinn asked each candidate to introduce him- or herself, then asked Louise Maher to officiate as Moderator for the Question and Answer session. Candidates names were drawn out of a hat, so the order for the introductions was as follows: 1. Angie Drake 2. Katy Gallagher 3. Alan Kerlin 4. Shane Rattenbury 5. Jeremy Hanson 6. Tom Sefton 7. Caroline Le Couteur 8. Mark Kulasingham [Two candidates, Steve Doszpot (Liberal Party) and David Matthews (ALP) had accepted WCCC’s invitation to the meeting, but were not present when their names were called.] A lengthy Question and Answer session followed, during which candidates responded to questions from WCCC members. Questions covered such issues as: a medical “super store” for North Canberra; neglect of Weston Creek area; size of Molonglo electorate; price of land in Molonglo; state of parks and gardens in ACT; support for a strategic, long-term approach to facilities for horses; lack of coordination between government departments; betterment tax; price of water; shop-front library for Weston Creek; swimming pool for Molonglo labelled as being for Weston Creek; transport/roads in and out of Molonglo area.
    [Show full text]
  • An Education Strategy for the ACT Paper Prepared by Dr Karen Macpherson, Bed, Phd in Collaboration with Jeremy Hanson, CSC, MLA ACT Shadow Minister for Education
    June 2021 Bringing out the best in every child An Education strategy for the ACT Paper prepared by Dr Karen Macpherson, BEd, PhD in collaboration with Jeremy Hanson, CSC, MLA ACT Shadow Minister for Education Recommended citation: Macpherson, KJ (2021) Bringing out the Best in Every Child: An Education Strategy for the ACT (A paper prepared for Jeremy Hanson, CSC, MLA, ACT Shadow Minister for Education) June 2021 “State and Territory results show that after taking account of intake and context differences, ACT government schools on average achieve negative results on every measure.” Lamb, in ACT Auditor-General’s Report Performance Information in ACT Public Schools, 2017:5 At a primary school level “by Year 5 students in the ACT are almost 6 months behind students in comparable schools.” Victoria University, Melbourne Government School Performance in the ACT, 2017:4 At the high school level “in writing and numeracy, in Years 7 and 9, almost all mean results from government high schools [tested] were below the equivalent mean results from statistically similar schools.” Australian National University Academic underperformance in ACT schools; 2018:13 It’s time to re-set Education in the ACT. About Jeremy Hanson Jeremy Hanson, CSC, MLA Jeremy Hanson is the ACT Shadow Minister for Education and Higher Education and Shadow Minister for Early Childhood Education. He is also Shadow Minister for Police and Veterans’ Affairs. He has been a member of the ACT Assembly since 2008 and has previously held positions including Leader of the Opposition, Shadow Minister for Health and Shadow Attorney General. Jeremy is the Opposition Whip and has extensive experience on Assembly committees including the Assembly’s Standing Committee on Education and Youth Affairs, Economic Development and Tourism and Justice and Community Safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Original Attachment
    Document 2 - Page 10 of 140 This Bill does not affect the prosecution or enforcement of Commonwealth and Territory laws relating to the sale or trafficking of cannabis, including laws prohibiting the possession of amounts of cannabis over 50g and the cultivation of 5 or more cannabis plants. Any advice you may be able to supply on the operation of Commonwealth laws on the proposed Bill would be a very valuable contribution. I look forward to any response you may be able to provide. I am also available for personal briefings on this matter. Yours sincerely, Jeremy Jeremy Hanson, CSC, MLA Member for Murrumbidgee |Shadow Attorney General |Shadow Minister for Veterans’ Affairs | ACT Legislative Assembly | P: 02 6205 0133 | F: 02 6205 3017 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This email, and any attachments, may be confidential and also privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and delete all copies of this transmission along with any attachments immediately. You should not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose its contents to any other person. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Attorney-General's Department documents released under FOI19/228 Page 2 of 159 Document 2 - Page 29 of 140 INQUIRY INTO DRUGS OF DEPENDENCE (PERSONAL CANNABIS USE) AMENDMENT BILL 2018 S TANDING C OMMITTEE ON H EALTH, A GEING AND C OMMUNITY S ERVICES J UNE 2019 REPORT 7 Attorney-General's Department documents released under FOI19/228 Page 3 of 159 Document
    [Show full text]
  • Proof Hansard
    DEBATES OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DAILY HANSARD Edited proof transcript 3 November 2020 This is an EDITED PROOF TRANSCRIPT of proceedings that is subject to further checking. Members’ suggested corrections for the official Weekly Hansard should be lodged in writing with the Hansard office (facsimile 02 6205 0025) no later than Wednesday, 11 November 2020. Answers to questions on notice will appear in the Weekly Hansard. Tuesday, 3 November 2020 Notice convening meeting ............................................................................................. 1 Swearing in of members ................................................................................................ 2 Election of Speaker ........................................................................................................ 3 Election of Chief Minister ............................................................................................. 3 Leader of the Opposition ............................................................................................... 7 Statement by member .................................................................................................. 11 Election of Deputy Speaker ......................................................................................... 13 Papers ........................................................................................................................... 13 Dates and times of next meetings ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Statements from All Elected Candidates
    Canberra Alliance for Participatory Democracy (CAPaD) www.canberra-alliance.org.au CANDIDATES’ STATEMENTS FOR THE 2016 ACT LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS For all candidates elected in the five electorates Authorised by Prof Bob Douglas on behalf of Canberra Alliance for Participatory Democracy 1 CONTENTS (CS= CANDIDATE STATEMENT ON FILE) CONTENTS (CS= CANDIDATE STATEMENT ON FILE) ............................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 3 ELECTORAL BOUNDARIES IN ACT FOR 2016 ............................................................................................. 4 1. ELECTED MEMBERS FOR THE ELECTORATE OF YERRABI ................................................................. 5 Alistair Coe Liberal Member for Yerrabi ....................................................................................................... 5 James Milligan Liberal Member for Yerrabi. ................................................................................................ 6 Meegan Fitzharris Labor Party Member For Yerrabi (CS) .......................................................................... 7 Suzanne Orr Labor Party Member for Yerrabi (CS) .................................................................................... 8 Michael Pettersson Labor Party Member for Yerrabi ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ACT Electoral Commission
    ` ACT Electoral Commission Review of 1 April to 30 September 2018 Gifts Reporting 2017/18 Annual Returns November 2018 FINAL ACT Electoral Commission Review of 1 April to 30 September 2018 Gifts Reporting, 2017/18 Annual Returns Contents 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Qualification ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Summary of Findings .................................................................................................................. 5 2 Detailed Findings ....................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Review of Gifts Reporting ........................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 The Australian Labor Party ACT Branch 1 April to 30 September 2018 Gifts Reporting ..... 7 2.1.2 The Liberal Party of Australia (A.C.T. Division) 1 April to 30 September 2018 Gifts Reporting ......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.3 The ACT Greens 1 April to 30 September 2018 Gifts Reporting .......................................... 7 2.1.4 The 1973 Foundation 1 April to 30 September
    [Show full text]
  • Winnunga News Meeting with Minister Scullion 2 SEPTEMBER 2016
    Aboriginal Health in Aboriginal Hands ISSN 2206-3080 Inside this Issue: Winnunga News Meeting with Minister Scullion 2 SEPTEMBER 2016 Family Praises Winnunga: Kyha’s Story 3, 4 CEO Update From Little Things Big Winnunga is extremely pleased that both the Liberal and Labor Things Grow: Fifty Parties have announced in the lead up to the coming ACT Years Since the election that they will support the construction of a new purpose Gurindji Walk Off built health facility for Winnunga. The Labor Party has costed the Wave Hill 5 commitment at $12 million. Auditor reveals that This is fantastic news and has been a cause of great excitement Julie Tongs OAM, CEO ‘Rehabilitation at the for all staff and clients at Winnunga. I would like to thank both AMC’ is an Oxymoron Jeremy Hanson and Andrew Barr for recognising the clear need 6 for a new health centre and for their support of the Aboriginal Child Protection in the community. ACT-Time for the ACT I also wish to acknowledge the other major commitment which Government to Step Up 7 the Liberal leader Jeremy Hanson and Shadow Minister for Aboriginal Affairs, Andrew Wall have made to fund over three years an additional ten AMA Calls Again for social health workers at Winnunga, at a cost of $1million dollars. I have written to both Governments to Work the Chief Minister Andrew Barr and Leader of the Greens Shane Rattenbury asking them With Aboriginal and to offer bipartisan support for this initiative. Torres Strait Islander People to Develop Winnunga has continued to work together with Solutions to Health ACT Health and our partner organisations Needs 8 Karralika and ATODA on the model of care and operating arrangements for the Ngunnawal Bush Vacancies on Elected Healing Farm, Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Body 8 Service.
    [Show full text]
  • The AMA ACT President, Dr Andrew Miller, Board, Staff and the Canberra Doctor Committee Extend Seasons Greetings to All and Best Wishes for 2014
    November/ December 2013 Canberra Doctor is proudly brought to you by the AMA (ACT) Limited Circulation: 1,900 in ACT & region The AMA ACT President, Dr Andrew Miller, Board, Staff and the Canberra Doctor committee extend Seasons Greetings to all and best wishes for 2014 November/December 2013 Volume 25, No. 10 TERRITORY TOPICALS – from President, Dr Andrew Miller So 2013 is drawing to a tory has demonstrated that we have new MOU has been agreed that Opposition in bipartisan support of been stiffed. I can think of no other respects our independence and value the National Skin Cancer Action close, and as always in way to describe the outcome. Initially in the federal AMA family. We are Week at an AMA initiative with the those brief moments the indexation decision appeared as a now working to rebuild a cooperative Cancer Council, the ACT Pollie Skin significant improvement on the gov- relationship with ASMOF; something Check; championing the public snatched between pre- ernment’s offering; but we have now that we all agree is in the best interests health message of sun protection Christmas specials the seen the whole of government enter- of both our members and the profes- and skin cancer awareness. mind drifts back over the prise bargaining outcome. I suspect sion in the ACT in general. So what does 2014 offer? I can that we will not be so meek next time. I can also report that as the year see some battle lines already being year with its early The salaried medical officer draws to a close our business affairs drawn over the border, but with the promise and the looming negotiations are ongoing, and we are show a healthy trend, and that we possibility of collateral damage here participating actively here, diligently have been able to continue to offer in the ACT.
    [Show full text]