Zionism: the Real Enemy of the Jews, Volume 1 Online
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Why Do They Hate Us?--Geography of the Palestine-Israel Conflict And
“Why Do They Hate Us/U.S.?” and “Why Do We Hate Them?” Is It Because Of “Their” Islam Or Because Of “Our” Support For Israel? Geography of the Palestine-Israel Conflict Presentation to the Association of American Geographers, Boston, MA, April 2008, and Bloomington, IN, November 2008 Mohamed Elyassini, PhD, Associate Professor of Geography, Indiana State University 1. “The bonds between the United States and Israel are unbreakable and the commitment of the United States to the security of Israel is ironclad… I and my administration have made the security of Israel a priority. It’s why we’ve increased cooperation between our militaries to unprecedented levels. It’s why we’re making our most advanced technologies available to our Israeli allies. It’s why, despite tough fiscal times, we’ve increased foreign military financing to record levels. And that includes additional support –- beyond regular military aid -– for the Iron Dome anti-rocket system… So make no mistake, we will maintain Israel’s qualitative military edge… You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Here in the United States, we’ve imposed the toughest sanctions ever on the Iranian regime… You also see our commitment to Israel’s security in our steadfast opposition to any attempt to de-legitimize the State of Israel. As I said at the United Nations last year, ‘Israel’s existence must not be a subject for debate,’ and ‘efforts to chip away at Israel’s legitimacy will only be met by the unshakeable opposition of the United States.’ So when the Durban Review Conference advanced anti-Israel sentiment, we withdrew. -
Egypt's Union with Syria, Its Impact and the June 1967
Egypt’s Union with Syria, its Impact and the June 1967 War S. Qalb-i-Abid / Massarrat Abid Introduction Four hundred and sixty five million people of the Middle East are almost of the same composition. They share a common language, culture and religion and believe in the concept of the Arab Nationalism - Umma al Arabiya. The Arabic language is a potent unifying bondage. Although spoken Arabic changes widely from area to area, the literary language is more or less the same throughout the Arab world; and all those who speak Arabic are regarded as a part of the Arab Nation. This sacred language of Islam and Quran is the common bondage among the Arabs. The Arab Middle East also comprises the Holy Places for the three major religions of the world - Islam, Christianity and Judaism and remains the place of origin of their faith. Religion has thus always played a major role in political, economic, and social aspects of life for very many years; and in all likelihood, it will also continue to be a significant factor in future politics of this region. Middle East therefore is rightly described as the cradle of Islam. The importance of Middle East in world affairs has been emphasized by the fact that two world wars have had their Middle Eastern commands; and events there, though not principal, weighed heavily on the final results of these gigantic international conflicts. Egypt’s Union with Syria 165 The Middle Eastern politics has therefore always been very important for the World. Politics, transportation, communications, markets, military strategy, imperialism, nationalism, culture, religion and natural resources of this area had always great attraction1 for the “Big Powers” as well as small countries. -
H-Diplo Roundtable, Vol
2017 H-Diplo Roundtable Editors: Thomas Maddux and Diane Labrosse @HDiplo Roundtable and Web Production Editor: George Fujii Introduction by Douglas Little Roundtable Review Volume XIX, No. 2 (2017) 11 September 2017 Salim Yaqub. Imperfect Strangers: Americans, Arabs, and U.S.-Middle East Relations in the 1970s. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2016. ISBN: 978-0-8014-4883-6 (hardcover, $35.00). URL: http://www.tiny.cc/Roundtable-XIX-2 Contents Introduction by Douglas Little, Clark University......................................................................................2 Review by Nathan Citino, Rice University ..................................................................................................6 Review by Craig Daigle, City College of New York .............................................................................. 12 Review by Pamela E. Pennock, University of Michigan, Dearborn ................................................ 18 Review by James Stocker, Trinity Washington University ................................................................ 22 Author’s Response by Salim Yaqub, University of California Santa Barbara .............................. 26 © 2017 The Authors. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License. H-Diplo Roundtable Review, Vol. XIX, No. 2 (2017) Introduction by Douglas Little, Clark University spent the past ten days grading bluebooks, watching the Trump administration implode, and battling writer’s block as I prepared to draft the introduction for this -
SHAFR Passport, September 2017
PASSPORT THE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIANS OF AMERICAN FOREIGN RELATIONS REVIEW VOLUME 48, NO. 2 SEPTEMBER 2017 IN THIS ISSUE The Rise of the Post-Cold War Order The Historiography of Religion and U.S. Foreign Relations Americans, Arabs, and the 1970s AND MORE... Passport THE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIANS OF AMERICAN FOREIGN RELATIONS REVIEW Editor Andrew L. Johns, Brigham Young University Assistant Editor Zeb Larson, The Ohio State University Production Editor Julie Rojewski, Michigan State University Editorial Advisory Board Sandra Scanlon, University College Dublin (2015-2017) Kenneth Osgood, Colorado School of Mines (2016-2018) Ryan Irwin, University at Albany, SUNY (2017-2019) Emeritus Editors Mitchell Lerner, The Ohio State University (2003-2012) William J. Brinker, Tennessee Technological University (1980-2003) Nolan Fowler, Tennessee Technological University (1973-1980) Gerald E. Wheeler, San Jose State College (1969-1973) Cover Image: President and Mrs. Nixon with Mr. and Mrs. Anwar Sadat at the site of the great pyramids at Giza. President (1969-1974 : Nixon). White House Photo Office. 1969-1974. Photo taken on 06/12/1974. National Archives Identifier: 194581. Local Identifier: NLRN-WHPO-E2945C-15. Passport Editorial Office: SHAFR Business Office: Andrew Johns Amy Sayward, Executive Director Department of History Department of History Brigham Young University Middle Tennessee State University 2161 JFSB, Provo, UT 84602 1301 East Main Street, Box 23 [email protected] Murfreesboro, TN 37132 801-422-8942 (phone) [email protected] 801-422-0275 (fax) 615-898-2569 Passport is published three times per year (April, September, January), by the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, and is distributed to all members of the Society. -
Bias and Objectivity in the Historiography of the Arab-Israeli Conflict
Bias and objectivity in the historiography of the Arab-Israeli conflict A case study of the time period 1967-74 ••• Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD Rikard Ehnsio School of Oriental and African Studies (University of London) ProQuest Number: 10672844 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10672844 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Abstract It has frequently been said that works on the Arab-Israeli conflict are biased to a large degree, but so far there has never been a serious study carried out analyzing the issue of bias and objectivity. This is the purpose of this thesis. To assist in this task, a methodology is introduced to work as a tool for examining bias. The methodology is focused on themes (e.g. events or interpretations) present in the analyzed sources and aims at categorizing the sources used as being pro-Israeli or pro-Arab in relation to the individual themes. The time frame looked upon is the time from 1967 to roughly 1974, and the works analyzed are all written in English with a presumably Western audience in mind.