DOCSLIB.ORG

Java Does Not Distribute

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Java Does Not Distribute Java Do es not Distribute Gerald Brose KlausPeter Lohr Andre Spiegel fbroselohrspiegelginffub erlinde Technical Report B Octob er Abstract Java is commonly considered the ideal language for implementing software for the In ternet A closer lo ok however reveals that distributed programming is p o orly supp orted in Java This is b ecause the very design of the language rules out distributiontransparent remote invo cation It is shown that Suns technology for distributed Java programming RMI makes things worse by allowing two dierent invo cation semantics to hide b ehind an ob ject variable The consequences of using CORBA instead of RMI are inv estigated Various options for changing either RMI or Java itself are considered so that language platforms supp orting a high degree of distribution transparency could be built Freie Universitat Berlin Institut fur Informatik Takustrae D Berlin Germany This rep ort also app ears in Pro c TOOLS Pacic Melb ourne Australia November Intro duction Java Gosling is b eing heralded as the ultimate language for internetbased distributed programming But when it comes to actually writing distributed applications a serious aw in the basic design of the language b ecomes apparent Javas typ e system together with its mechanism of parameter passing leads to problems with remote metho d invo ca tion The current version of Java do es not allow for a distributed implementation where remote metho d invo cation would have the same semantics as its lo cal counterpart The problem is also not adequately addressed in RMI Sun Suns proprietary technology a programming As a result semantic deviations from the intended for distributed Jav program logic can o ccur in distributed programs written in JavaRMI It is therefore questionable whether Java in its current form is a suitable platform for distributed pro gramming The problem is explained in section which is followed by a discussion of RMI in section Section explores the combination of Java and CORBA OMG Our observations suggest that revising the language itself may b e the only satisfactory solution Several options for this are discussed in section and our preferred option is presented Remote parameters in Jav a Javas metho d invo cation mechanism is not suitable for distributed programming based on remote invo cation To show this we will rst sketch the syntax and semantics of purely lo cal invo cations fo cussing on parameter passing and then lo ok at the consequences of extending this invo cation semantics to the distributed case Java parameter passing An ordinary Java metho d is invoked using the familiar notation objectRefmethodNamearg arg n Java like C has only one parameter passing mo de passbyvalue For primitive types such as integer character etc this means that the metho d receives a copy of the actual value If an ychanges aremadetosuch a copy during the execution of the metho d these changes are not visible in the calling context If an actual parameter has a reference type a reference to an ob ject is copied causing the ob ject to be shared among caller and callee Any changes the metho d makes to the ob ject are visible in the calling context In Java all instances of classes have reference typ es including strings which are instances of the library class String and arrays for which no library class exists Java provides no parameter passing mo de that would er a copy of the ob ject as eg Eiel do es using dereference a parameter and deliv expanded typ es Meyer Wesay that Java passes ob jects by reference not byvalue It is imp ortant to note that since the only way of constructing userdened typ es is by writing new classes al l userdened typ es are reference typ es Thus there is no way of passing an ob ject of a userdened class by value Parameters in distributed programs In a distributed program ob ject invo cation may cross machine b oundaries If the caller and the callee reside on dierent machines invo cation must be implemented as remote method invocation which is the ob jectoriented analog to remote pro cedure call RPC Instead of passing the arguments in pro cessor registers or on the stack the caller must pack them into a network message and the callee must unpack them This is called marshalling or serialization and unmarshalling of the parameters A problem arises when references are involved in passing parameters remotely a reference is usually represented as a virtual address in the callers address space it makes no sense to dereference it in a dierent address space So the reference has to be passed in a networkwide representation which can in turn be used for remotely invoking the ob ject it refers to How do es this apply to Java The rst observation is that there is no obstacle to implementing remote invo cation for programmerdened classes Referencetyp e param eters can b e passed in a networkwide representation embedded references can b e taken care of in the same manner A closer view however reveals that the resulting programming platform is of little use Generally sp eaking it is alright to distribute services in this way ie passing references to ob jects that are invoked infrequently so that the increased latency of remote invo cations is negligible But what ab out distributing data ie passing arrays and records ob jects without metho ds If an array of say numb ers is passed to a remote metho d for pro cessing the receiver just gets the reference Pro cessing the arraymay then require remote accesses given the latency of each individual access this approach is plainly prohibitivenot to mention the problem of compiling array indexing into remote access The same problem is encountered with records where while not as drastic it is still annoying With strings fortunately the problem disapp ears Strings are immutable ob jects in Java so passing a string by reference can be implemented as pass byvalue b ecause the semantics is the same RMI Suns Remote Metho d Invo cation RMI system aims at providing mechanisms for seam less remote invo cation on ob jects in dierent virtual machines Sun and tries to inte grate the distributed ob ject mo del into the Java language in a natural way while retaining most of the Java languages ob ject semantics It turns out that the keyword is most tries RMI RMI do es preserve the regular Java invo cation syntax but parameters of remote op er ations are treated dierent from those of lo cal op erations Remote passing is done as follows If an actual parameter has a primitive typ e it is passed by value If an actual parameter has a reference typ e and its class implements the Remote interface it is passed by reference the lo cal reference b eing replaced with a network reference If the class do es not implement Remote but rather implements the Serializable interface the ob ject is passed by v alue using serialization If the class implements neither Remote nor Serializable an exception is raised Arrays are serializable by default While this seems to solve the main problem by not promoting arrays to full remote ob jects and allowing for records to be passed by value rather than by reference this approach has its own pitfalls Consider the following example Let RemoteStack denote a class for remotely invokable stacks of integers implementing Remote A stack stores its values in an array int cells In addition to the usual stack op erations such as push pop top it exp orts an op eration public int dump return cells delivering the values currently stored in the stack There are several stacks in our distributed system registered in a StackDictionary ob ject Our demonstration program plays with two stacks listed in the dictionary public class RMItest static RemoteStack s null static RemoteStack s null static StackDictionary stacks new StackDictionary public static void mainString args stacks are created at different sites and registered with dictionary s stacksgetthat s stacksgetthis spush spush int there sdump int here sdump there here Systemoutprintthere stop Systemoutprinthere stop but fails As dump delivers an array and arrays are Serializable by default the result of a remote invo cation will be a copy of the stacks array So the output of the program should b e there here but be also prepared to see there here Why is this It is p ossible that one of the stacks s in this case happ ens to be lo cal to the caller which causes the standard parameter passing semantics to take eect yes So a reference to the array will b e delivered causing the assignment here to eectively mo dify the stack The example shows that not only can two seemingly alike ob jects have dierent be haviour but worse there is no way to tell them apart This is b ecause it is imp ossible to or actually lo cal nd out whether an ob ject with a Remote interface is indeed remote to the caller If we inadvertently and not knowing use a Remote ob ject lo cally as in the example the op eration semantics may be dierent from what was exp ected Note that we are not referring to a dierent exceptional semantics in the face of network latency or failure but to the successful execution of an op eration Also note that there is indeed no way of telling remote from lo cal ob jects even if we knew that taking one for the other might cause problems both ob jects have the same typ e and wehav enoway of tracking down every single ob ject reference in a system RMI turns out to b e dangerously confusing it gives the programmer the false impression that although Remote and Serializable parameters are treated dierently at least
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gnu Smalltalk Library Reference Version 3.2.5 24 November 2017
    gnu Smalltalk Library Reference Version 3.2.5 24 November 2017 by Paolo Bonzini Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled \GNU Free Documentation License". 1 3 1 Base classes 1.1 Tree Classes documented in this manual are boldfaced. Autoload Object Behavior ClassDescription Class Metaclass BlockClosure Boolean False True CObject CAggregate CArray CPtr CString CCallable CCallbackDescriptor CFunctionDescriptor CCompound CStruct CUnion CScalar CChar CDouble CFloat CInt CLong CLongDouble CLongLong CShort CSmalltalk CUChar CByte CBoolean CUInt CULong CULongLong CUShort ContextPart 4 GNU Smalltalk Library Reference BlockContext MethodContext Continuation CType CPtrCType CArrayCType CScalarCType CStringCType Delay Directory DLD DumperProxy AlternativeObjectProxy NullProxy VersionableObjectProxy PluggableProxy SingletonProxy DynamicVariable Exception Error ArithmeticError ZeroDivide MessageNotUnderstood SystemExceptions.InvalidValue SystemExceptions.EmptyCollection SystemExceptions.InvalidArgument SystemExceptions.AlreadyDefined SystemExceptions.ArgumentOutOfRange SystemExceptions.IndexOutOfRange SystemExceptions.InvalidSize SystemExceptions.NotFound SystemExceptions.PackageNotAvailable SystemExceptions.InvalidProcessState SystemExceptions.InvalidState
    [Show full text]
  • Secure the Clones - Static Enforcement of Policies for Secure Object Copying Thomas Jensen, Florent Kirchner, David Pichardie
    Secure the Clones - Static Enforcement of Policies for Secure Object Copying Thomas Jensen, Florent Kirchner, David Pichardie To cite this version: Thomas Jensen, Florent Kirchner, David Pichardie. Secure the Clones - Static Enforcement of Policies for Secure Object Copying. ESOP 2011, 2011, Saarbrucken, Germany. hal-01110817 HAL Id: hal-01110817 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01110817 Submitted on 28 Jan 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Secure the Clones * Static Enforcement of Policies for Secure Object Copying Thomas Jensen, Florent Kirchner, and David Pichardie INRIA Rennes – Bretagne Atlantique, France [email protected] Abstract. Exchanging mutable data objects with untrusted code is a delicate matter because of the risk of creating a data space that is accessible by an attacker. Consequently, secure programming guidelines for Java stress the importance of using defensive copying before accepting or handing out references to an inter- nal mutable object. However, implementation of a copy method (like clone()) is entirely left to the programmer. It may not provide a sufficiently deep copy of an object and is subject to overriding by a malicious sub-class. Currently no language-based mechanism supports secure object cloning.
    [Show full text]
  • Lazy Object Copy As a Platform for Population-Based Probabilistic Programming
    Lazy object copy as a platform for population-based probabilistic programming Lawrence M. Murray Uber AI Abstract This work considers dynamic memory management for population-based probabilistic programs, such as those using particle methods for inference. Such programs exhibit a pattern of allocating, copying, potentially mutating, and deallocating collections of similar objects through successive generations. These objects may assemble data structures such as stacks, queues, lists, ragged arrays, and trees, which may be of random, and possibly unbounded, size. For the simple case of N particles, T generations, D objects, and resampling at each generation, dense representation requires O(DNT ) memory, while sparse representation requires only O(DT + DN log DN) memory, based on existing theoretical results. This work describes an object copy-on-write platform to automate this saving for the programmer. The core idea is formalized using labeled directed multigraphs, where vertices represent objects, edges the pointers between them, and labels the necessary bookkeeping. A specific labeling scheme is proposed for high performance under the motivating pattern. The platform is implemented for the Birch probabilistic programming language, using smart pointers, hash tables, and reference-counting garbage collection. It is tested empirically on a number of realistic probabilistic programs, and shown to significantly reduce memory use and execution time in a manner consistent with theoretical expectations. This enables copy-on-write for the imperative programmer, lazy deep copies for the object-oriented programmer, and in-place write optimizations for the functional programmer. 1 Introduction Probabilistic programming aims at better accommodating the workflow of probabilistic modeling and inference in general-purpose programming languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Concurrent Copying Garbage Collection with Hardware Transactional Memory
    Concurrent Copying Garbage Collection with Hardware Transactional Memory Zixian Cai 蔡子弦 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Bachelor of Philosophy (Honours) at The Australian National University November 2020 © Zixian Cai 2020 Typeset in TeX Gyre Pagella, URW Classico, and DejaVu Sans Mono by XƎTEX and XƎLATEX. Except where otherwise indicated, this thesis is my own original work. Zixian Cai 12 November 2020 To 2020, what does not kill you makes you stronger. Acknowledgments First and foremost, I thank my shifu1, Steve Blackburn. When I asked you how to learn to do research, you said that it often takes the form of an apprenticeship. Indeed, you taught me the craft of research by example, demonstrating how to be a good teacher, a good researcher, and a good community leader. Apart from the vast technical ex- pertise, you have also been a constant source of advice, support, and encouragement throughout my undergraduate career. I could not ask for a better mentor. I thank Mike Bond from The Ohio State University, who co-supervises me. Meet- ings with you and Steve are always enjoyable for me. I am sorry for the meetings that went over time, often around the dinner time for you, lowering your glucose level. You help me turn complicated ideas into implementation with your experiences in hard- ware transactional memory. I am thankful for your patient guidance and inspiration. Many people have helped me with this thesis. I thank Adrian Herrera, Kunal Sa- reen, and Brenda Wang for subjecting themselves to the draft of this document, and providing valuable feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Obstacl: a Language with Objects, Subtyping, and Classes
    OBSTACL: A LANGUAGE WITH OBJECTS, SUBTYPING, AND CLASSES A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Amit Jayant Patel December 2001 c Copyright 2002 by Amit Jayant Patel All Rights Reserved ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opin- ion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. John Mitchell (Principal Adviser) I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opin- ion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Kathleen Fisher I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opin- ion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. David Dill Approved for the University Committee on Graduate Studies: iii Abstract Widely used object-oriented programming languages such as C++ and Java support soft- ware engineering practices but do not have a clean theoretical foundation. On the other hand, most research languages with well-developed foundations are not designed to support software engineering practices. This thesis bridges the gap by presenting OBSTACL, an object-oriented extension of ML with a sound theoretical basis and features that lend themselves to efficient implementation. OBSTACL supports modular programming techniques with objects, classes, structural subtyping, and a modular object construction system. OBSTACL's parameterized inheritance mechanism can be used to express both single inheritance and most common uses of multiple inheritance.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 8 EECS 498 Winter 2000
    C++ Object Model Classes are abstract types. Objects are instances of that type. Three distinctive aspects of an OO System • Encapsulation Classes group related data and methods • Inheritance Derived classes extend and refine existing abstractions ... the design of consistent, intuitive, and useful class hierarchies is a complex and difficult art. • Dynamic Binding (polymorphism) Delay selection of appropriate abstraction implementation until program execution. ... OO programming is abstract data types with polymorphism C++ Object Model 1 of 19 Lecture 8 EECS 498 Winter 2000 Aspects to Examine • Distinctive Types of Programming • Semantics of Constructors • Semantics of Data • Semantics of Functions • Semantics of Construction, Destruction & Copy C++ Object Model 2 of 19 Lecture 8 EECS 498 Winter 2000 Distinctive Types of Programming • Procedural char *target, *source = “Hello World!”; target = malloc( strlen( source )); strcpy( target, source ); • Abstract Data Type String target, source = “Hello World!”; target = source; if (source == target) ... • Object Oriented class B { virtual int F(int) {return 1;} /* pure? /; } class D : B { virtual void F(int) { return 2;} } class E : B { virtual void F(int) { return 3;} } ... B *b = new B, B *d = new D, E *e = new D; cout << b->F() << d->F() << e->F() << endl; Object oriented model requires reference to operating object. Referred to as this (self, current, etc.) Often first parameter to function C++ Object Model 3 of 19 Lecture 8 EECS 498 Winter 2000 Storage Layout Procedural • Storage sizes are known at compile time Pointers have fixed size on target platform Data namespace encapsulated in type structure Function namespace global Abstract Data Types • Namespace for functions bound to data structure Signature of function is name, result type, parameter types Object Oriented • Virtual functions invocation structure Virtual base classes A virtual base class occurs exactly once in a derived class regardless of the number of times encountered in the class inheritance heirarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • SECURE the CLONES 1. Introduction Exchanging Data Objects with Untrusted Code Is a Delicate Matter Because of the Risk of Creati
    Logical Methods in Computer Science Vol. 8 (2:05) 2012, pp. 1–30 Submitted Sep. 17, 2011 www.lmcs-online.org Published May. 31, 2012 SECURE THE CLONES THOMAS JENSEN, FLORENT KIRCHNER, AND DAVID PICHARDIE INRIA Rennes { Bretagne Atlantique, France e-mail address: fi[email protected] Abstract. Exchanging mutable data objects with untrusted code is a delicate matter be- cause of the risk of creating a data space that is accessible by an attacker. Consequently, secure programming guidelines for Java stress the importance of using defensive copying before accepting or handing out references to an internal mutable object. However, im- plementation of a copy method (like clone()) is entirely left to the programmer. It may not provide a sufficiently deep copy of an object and is subject to overriding by a mali- cious sub-class. Currently no language-based mechanism supports secure object cloning. This paper proposes a type-based annotation system for defining modular copy policies for class-based object-oriented programs. A copy policy specifies the maximally allowed sharing between an object and its clone. We present a static enforcement mechanism that will guarantee that all classes fulfil their copy policy, even in the presence of overriding of copy methods, and establish the semantic correctness of the overall approach in Coq. The mechanism has been implemented and experimentally evaluated on clone methods from several Java libraries. 1. Introduction Exchanging data objects with untrusted code is a delicate matter because of the risk of creating a data space that is accessible by an attacker. Consequently, secure programming guidelines for Java such as those proposed by Sun [17] and CERT [6] stress the importance of using defensive copying or cloning before accepting or handing out references to an internal mutable object.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory Management for Multi-Language Multi-Runtime Systems on Multi-Core Architectures
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Memory Management for Multi-Language Multi-Runtime Systems on Multi-Core Architectures A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science by Michal Wegiel Committee in Charge: Professor Chandra Krintz, Chair Professor Amr El Abbadi Professor Ben Zhao March 2011 The Dissertation of Michal Wegiel is approved: Professor Amr El Abbadi Professor Ben Zhao Professor Chandra Krintz, Committee Chairperson January 2011 Memory Management for Multi-Language Multi-Runtime Systems on Multi-Core Architectures Copyright © 2011 by Michal Wegiel iii Dedication and Gratitude I dedicate this dissertation to my family: my parents, Maria and Krzysztof, and my sister, Barbara, for their unconditional support and encouragement throughout all stages of my education. I am deeply grateful to Chandra Krintz for all the support, guidance, mentorship, and help that she has provided during the entire process. I would like to thank Ben Zhao, Amr El Abbadi, and Rich Wolski for serving on my Ph.D. committee. I am grateful to Grzegorz Czajkowski and Laurent Daynes for being my mentors and collaborators during my internship at Sun Labs. Finally, I would like to thank the staff, faculty, and fellow graduate students at the Com- puter Science department at UC Santa Barbara for their support and the opportunity to pursue this work. iv Acknowledgements The text of Chapters 3–7 is in part a reprint of the material as it appears in the conference proceedings listed below. The dissertation author was the primary researcher while the co-author listed on each publication directed and supervised the research which forms the basis for these chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Objective-C 2.0 Essentials Third Edition
    Objective-C 2.0 Essentials Third Edition i Objective-C 2.0 Essentials – Third Edition ISBN-13: 978-1480262102 © 2012 Neil Smyth. This book is provided for personal use only. Unauthorized use, reproduction and/or distribution strictly prohibited. All rights reserved. The content of this book is provided for informational purposes only. Neither the publisher nor the author offers any warranties or representation, express or implied, with regard to the accuracy of information contained in this book, nor do they accept any liability for any loss or damage arising from any errors or omissions. This book contains trademarked terms that are used solely for editorial purposes and to the benefit of the respective trademark owner. The terms used within this book are not intended as infringement of any trademarks. Find more eBooks online at http://www.eBookFrenzy.com. Rev. 3.0 ii Table of Contents 1. About Objective-C Essentials ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Why are you reading this? .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Supported Platforms ............................................................................................................. 2 2. The History of Objective-C .......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 The C Programming Language .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Memory Management Programming Guide
    Memory Management Programming Guide Performance 2010-06-24 PROVIDED “AS IS,” AND YOU, THE READER, ARE ASSUMING THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO ITS QUALITY Apple Inc. AND ACCURACY. © 2010 Apple Inc. IN NO EVENT WILL APPLE BE LIABLE FOR DIRECT, All rights reserved. INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ANY DEFECT OR INACCURACY IN THIS DOCUMENT, even No part of this publication may be reproduced, if advised of the possibility of such damages. stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in THE WARRANTY AND REMEDIES SET FORTH ABOVE any form or by any means, mechanical, ARE EXCLUSIVE AND IN LIEU OF ALL OTHERS, ORAL OR WRITTEN, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. No Apple electronic, photocopying, recording, or dealer, agent, or employee is authorized to make otherwise, without prior written permission of any modification, extension, or addition to this Apple Inc., with the following exceptions: Any warranty. person is hereby authorized to store Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of implied warranties or liability for incidental or documentation on a single computer for consequential damages, so the above limitation or personal use only and to print copies of exclusion may not apply to you. This warranty gives you specific legal rights, and you may also have documentation for personal use provided that other rights which vary from state to state. the documentation contains Apple’s copyright notice. The Apple logo is a trademark of Apple Inc. Use of the “keyboard” Apple logo (Option-Shift-K) for commercial purposes without the prior written consent of Apple may constitute trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of federal and state laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Life with Object-Relational Mappers Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the ORM
    Life with Object-Relational Mappers Or, how I learned to stop worrying and love the ORM. PGCon 2011 Christophe Pettus PostgreSQL Experts, Inc. [email protected] Has this ever happened to you? • “This query is running way too slowly. God, RDBMSes suck!” • “Well, you just need to change the WHERE clause…” • “I can’t change the SQL. We’re using an…” ORM Let’s talk about ORMs. • What is an ORM? • Why do we have to put up with them? • What are they good at? • What are the problems? • Can’t we just make them go away? • No. Sorry. • How can we live with them? Oh, right. Hi! • Christophe Pettus • Consultant with PostgreSQL Experts, Inc. • PostgreSQL person since 1998. • Application and systems architect. • Designed a bunch of ORMs for various languages. WHEN WORLDS COLLIDE. The Two Worlds • Object-Oriented Programming. • Relational Database Management. Object-Oriented Programming. • Let’s ask Wikipedia! • “Object-oriented programming (OOP) is a programming paradigm using ‘objects’ …” • Ask three programmers, get five answers. • “… – data structures consisting of data fields and methods together with their interactions – to design applications and computer programs.” What is the critical OO feature? • Data abstraction? Nope. • Messaging? Nope. • Modularity? Nope. • Polymorphism? Nope, but getting warmer. • Inheritance? Getting colder… • Encapsulation. Encapsulation • Objects export behavior, not data. • Many language expose the data — but that’s a shortcut. • Many objects don’t have significant behavior — but that’s a degenerate case. • OO is all about wrapping up the behavior and the data into a single package, the object. Object Relationships. • Object models are collections of graphs.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Java Programming Concepts
    Appendix A Important Java Programming Concepts This appendix provides a brief orientation through the concepts of object-oriented programming in Java that are critical for understanding the material in this book and that are not specifically introduced as part of the main content. It is not intended as a general Java programming primer, but rather as a refresher and orientation through the features of the language that play a major role in the design of software in Java. If necessary, this overview should be complemented by an introductory book on Java programming, or on the relevant sections in the Java Tutorial [10]. A.1 Variables and Types Variables store values. In Java, variables are typed and the type of the variable must be declared before the name of the variable. Java distinguishes between two major categories of types: primitive types and reference types. Primitive types are used to represent numbers and Boolean values. Variables of a primitive type store the actual data that represents the value. When the content of a variable of a primitive type is assigned to another variable, a copy of the data stored in the initial variable is created and stored in the destination variable. For example: int original = 10; int copy = original; In this case variable original of the primitive type int (short for “integer”) is assigned the integer literal value 10. In the second assignment, a copy of the value 10 is used to initialize the new variable copy. Reference types represent more complex arrangements of data as defined by classes (see Section A.2).
    [Show full text]