DOCSLIB.ORG

How to Respond to the Lgbt Movement by Peter Sprigg How to Respond to the Lgbt Movement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
How to Respond to the Lgbt Movement by Peter Sprigg How to Respond to the Lgbt Movement HOW TO RESPOND TO THE LGBT MOVEMENT BY PETER SPRIGG HOW TO RESPOND TO THE LGBT MOVEMENT By Peter Sprigg In recent decades, there has been an assault on separately. Here, FRC will recount some of the the sexes. That is, there has been an attack on major claims asserted by these two movements, the previously undisputed reality that human be- and explain based on the science and evidence ings are created either male or female; that there why those claims are inaccurate. are significant differences between the sexes; and that those differences result in at least some In recent years, activists pushing for a “LGBT differences in the roles played by men and wom- rights” political agenda— en in society. such as the redefinition of civil marriage to include The first wave of this attack came from the mod- same-sex couples and the ern feminist movement, challenging traditional expansion of non-discrim- social roles of men and women. The second wave ination laws to include came from the homosexual movement, chal- sexual orientation and gen- lenging the principle that men and women are der identity as protected created to be sexually complementary to one categories—have become another. The third wave of this assault on the increasingly virulent in sexes has come from the transgender movement, their attacks upon social conservatives who resist which has attacked a basic reality—that all peo- that agenda. Examples of these attacks include a ple have a biological sex, identifiable at birth and Colorado public official comparing the exercise of immutable through life, which makes them ei- religious conscience by a baker of wedding cakes ther male or female. to slavery and the Holocaust,1 and the Southern Poverty Law Center’s continual expansion of the There are certainly overlaps between the homo- list of mainstream pro-family groups that it labels sexual and transgender movements—both assert as “Anti-LGBT Hate Groups”2 —even after the a radical personal autonomy even in defiance of list was used to target Family Research Council the natural characteristics and complementarity for an act of terrorism in 2012.3 of the two sexes. As a result, the two movements have also been allied politically more often than Such attacks reveal a fundamental misunder- not. For that reason, Family Research Council standing (if not deliberate misrepresentation) here offers a response to both. of the beliefs, arguments, and motives of social conservatives. However, there are also sufficient conceptual dif- ferences between the issues of “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” for them to be addressed 1 A WORD ON SEXUAL IDENTITY AND LANGUAGE First, it is important to clarify FRC’s position and that of many social conservatives on the nature of human sexuality. We believe that every person, no matter who they are sexually attracted to, is identity as gay, lesbian, etc. is who they are. As we created in the image and likeness of God. There- will explore, this idea is empirically false. fore, all people are equal in dignity and value and must be treated with respect. We instead say “people who engage in homo- sexual conduct” or “people who identify as We believe that sexual attractions or other sub- homosexual.” (A comment on language choices jective psychological feelings do not define a regarding gender identity issues can be found un- person. Rather, every person is defined by their der the section “Responding to the Transgender immutable, in-born biological sex, which is pres- Movement” on page 13.) ent and identifiable in the DNA of every cell in the human body. While it is certainly true It should also be noted that in the context of the that some people identify very strongly as “gay,” political debates over LGBT issues, social con- “lesbian,” “bisexual,” “transgender,” or another servatives do not consider people who identify as identity and act according to this identity, this lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender to be their behavior does not define them, just as a so-called adversaries. We recognize that most people who “straight” person is not defined by their “straight- identify as LGBT are content to keep their sex ness.” Rather, the divinely intended purpose lives private rather than demand official gov- of human sexuality is inherently present in the ernment affirmation of their sexual identity or complementarity of the male and female sex, as conduct. This is why we will sometimes use the created by God and described in the first chapter terms “homosexual/transgender/LGBT activ- of the Book of Genesis. ists” to describe those people whose political and social agenda—the forced public affirmation and Therefore, when discussing homosexuality, we celebration of LGBT identity and conduct—we avoid using the terms “gay,” “lesbian,” or “bisex- oppose in the public square. ual” as solo nouns because this tends to imply that some people’s intrinsic, inborn, immutable 2 RESPONDING TO THE However, this conclusion HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT about critics of homosexuality cannot be valid unless the pre- The widespread misunderstanding of the conser- suppositions of the gay identity vative position on homosexuality arises from the paradigm are empirically true; existence of two completely different paradigms, and it is not logical unless so- or fundamental ways of understanding the nature cial conservatives are operating of human sexuality. from the same paradigm. LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) In reality, the empirical case for the gay identity activist groups, and a growing portion of ma- paradigm is extremely weak and is, in any case, jor social institutions such as academia and the subject to legitimate debate. Furthermore, what news media, have come to adopt a view of sexual is beyond dispute is that social conservatives do orientation that we might call the “gay identity” not view homosexuality and transgenderism from paradigm. The foundations of this paradigm are the perspective of the gay identity paradigm. these beliefs: Therefore, it is not only unfair and misguided, but it is simply illogical to impugn the motives of 1. Sexual orientation is an innate personal social conservatives based on that paradigm. characteristic, like race. CLAIM #1 2. People are born either gay, lesbian, bisexual, or straight. “Sexual orientation is an innate personal characteristic, like race.” 3. Homosexual people can never become heterosexual. To deconstruct the gay identity paradigm, and understand the alternative view which drives 4. Being homosexual is essentially no social conservatives, it is necessary to examine different from being straight, except the actual nature of sexual orientation. Too for the gender to which one is sexually often, it is assumed that sexual orientation is a attracted. unitary phenomenon whose meaning is clear. This is not the case. 5. There is no harm in being homosexual. Based on these beliefs (or, in many cases, unspoken presuppositions), homosexual activist “SEXUAL ORIENTATION” IS AN groups declare, and some others have come UMBRELLA TERM FOR THREE to accept, that for someone to believe that QUITE DIFFERENT THINGS: SEXUAL heterosexuality is preferable to homosexuality is ATTRACTION, SEXUAL CONDUCT, AND equivalent to believing that one race is superior SEXUAL IDENTITY. to another, and therefore represents a form of bigotry and even “hate” toward individuals who identify as homosexual. 3 As all serious researchers CLAIM #2 in human sexuality under- “Social conservatives ‘hate’ gay people stand, “sexual orientation” is for ‘who they are.’” an umbrella term for three quite different things. The The gay identity paradigm is simplistic, since it first of these is one’s sexual is based on the assumption (which the research attractions—is a person sexu- clearly shows to be false) that sexual orienta- ally attracted to people of the tion is a unitary characteristic. Under this view, opposite sex, the same sex, or people are either gay or not gay, so to criticize both? The second element of homosexuality is to denigrate some people for sexual orientation is sexual “who they are.” conduct—what sex acts does an individual choose to engage in, and with whom? The third element of sexual orientation is sexual self-identification— “SOCIAL CONSERVATIVES DO NOT BELIEVE does an individual think of himself or herself, OR ARGUE THAT ‘GAY PEOPLE ARE INFERIOR,’ and/or publicly identify himself or herself to oth- AS HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVISTS CHARGE. WHAT WE BELIEVE AND ARGUE IS THAT ers, as “gay,” “lesbian,” “straight,” “bisexual,” or HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT IS HARMFUL.” something else? 4 The gay identity paradigm assumes that these aspects of sexual orientation will always be con- Social conservatives approach the topic of sistent with one another—that is, for example, homosexuality using a completely different para- that a person with same-sex attractions will also digm—one that is more sophisticated, and more engage exclusively in homosexual conduct and consistent with the research on human sexuali- publicly self-identify as gay or lesbian. ty and sexual orientation, than the gay identity paradigm. This paradigm is based on the reality However, scientific research into human sexu- that same-sex attractions, homosexual conduct, ality has clearly shown that this is not always the and self-identification as gay are three separate case. Some people experience same-sex attrac- (although related) matters which must be ad- tions, but do not choose to engage in homosexual dressed separately. conduct (or choose to engage in heterosexual con- duct instead). Some people experience same-sex For social conservatives, particularly when it attractions and engage in homosexual conduct, comes to public policy debates related to ho- but do not self-identify as gay or lesbian. It has mosexuality, homosexual conduct is by far the been observed that in unique situations (such as most important of the three elements of sexual prisons), people who neither experience same- orientation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Faithful America • Glaad • Human Rights Campaign • People for the American Way • Southern Poverty Law Center
    FAITHFUL AMERICA • GLAAD • HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN • PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY • SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER Sept. 23, 2015 We understand that you’ve been invited to speak at the upcoming Values Voter Summit being held in Washington, D.C., from Sept. 25-27. Given the demonizing lies about the LGBT community spread by the host, the Family Research Council (FRC), and a major sponsor of the event, the American Family Association, we urge you to not lend the prestige of your office or candidacy to the summit. The FRC has amassed an extensive record of vilifying gays and lesbians with falsehoods – portraying them as sick, evil, incestuous, violent, perverted, and a danger to the nation. Perhaps its most insidious claim is that gay men molest children at a far higher rate than heterosexual men. Despite the fact that this claim has been refuted by all credible scientific authorities, including the American Psychological Association, the FRC has continued to smear gays and lesbians by claiming that pedophilia, in the words of FRC President Tony Perkins, “is a homosexual problem.” Perkins also says the “It Gets Better” campaign, an initiative designed to give LGBT students hope for a better tomorrow, is “disgusting” and part of a “concerted effort” to “recruit” children into the gay “lifestyle.” One senior FRC official has even argued that homosexuality should be illegal. The AFA has called an Office Depot anti-bullying campaign a “horribly irresponsible” attempt to “indoctrinate your children that they are born gay,” adding that it would “ultimately
    [Show full text]
  • THE ANTI-GAY LOBBY the Family Research Council, the American Family Association & the Demonization of LGBT People
    THE ANTI-GAY LOBBY The Family Research Council, the American Family Association & the Demonization of LGBT People A Special Report from the Southern Poverty Law Center Montgomery, Alabama OCTOBER 7, 2011 southern poverty law center THE ANTI-GAY LOBBY The Family Research Council, the American Family Association & the Demonization of LGBT People the southern poverty law center is a nonprofit organization that combats hate, intolerance and discrimination through education and litigation. Its Intelligence Project, which prepared this report and also produces the quarterly investigative mag- azine Intelligence Report, tracks the activities of hate groups and other extremists. Its Teaching Tolerance project helps foster respect and understanding in the classroom. Its litigation arm files lawsuits against hate groups for the violent acts of their members. MEDIA AND GENERAL INQUIRIES Mark Potok or Heidi Beirich Southern Poverty Law Center 400 Washington Ave., Montgomery, Ala. (334) 956-8200 www.splcenter.org The SPLC is supported entirely by private donations. No government funds are involved. © Southern Poverty Law Center. All rights reserved southern poverty law center Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 Profile: Family Research Council 6 Profile: American Family Association 10 The Myths: 10 Tall Tales Debunked 13 The Math: Anti-LGBT Hate Violence 19 southern poverty law center Executive Summary Together, the Family Research Council (FRC) and the American Family Association (AFA) may comprise the most important anti-gay lobby in this country. Since 2006, the FRC has hosted the Values Voter Summit, an annual conference for social conservatives that attracts numerous public figures — and whose latest edition opens today in the nation’s capital.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTHERN POVERTY Law CENTER • FAITHFUL AMERICA GAY
    Southern Poverty Law Center • FaithFuL ameriCa Gay & LeSbian aLLianCe AgainSt DeFamation • human riGhtS CamPaiGn nationaL bLaCk JuStiCe CoaLition • nationaL CounCiL oF La raza PeoPLe For the ameriCan way FounDation Sept. 7, 2012 Dear Values Voter Summit Speaker, We understand that you’ve been invited to speak at the Values Voter Summit being held in Washington, D.C., from Sept. 14-16. The host of the event, the Family Research Council (FRC), has consistently spread demonizing lies about the LGBT community, and one of its co-sponsors, the American Family Association (AFA), has linked homosexuality to the Holocaust. Given the FRC’s and AFA’s public statements, we urge you not to lend the prestige of your office to the summit. The FRC is far outside of the mainstream. It has engaged in repeated, groundless demonization — portraying LGBT people as sick, vile, incestuous, violent, perverted, and a danger to the nation. One of its officials has gone so far as to say homosexuality should be criminalized. (See www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/groups/ family-research-council.) Perhaps the FRC’s ugliest lie is its claim that gay men molest children at a far higher rate than heterosexual men — that pedophilia “is a homosexual problem,” in the words of Tony Perkins, the FRC president. All credible scientific authorities, including the American Psychological Association, reject the claim. The FRC, on the other hand, has gone so far as to claim that “[o]ne of the primary goals of the homosexual rights movement is to abolish all age of consent laws and to eventually recognize pedophiles as the ‘prophets’ of a new sexual order.” The FRC’s extremism is vividly illustrated by the fact that it has invited the AFA to co-sponsor the Summit at which you have been invited to speak.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    Case 1:17-cv-01597-CKK Document 52-1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 1 of 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Jane Doe 1, et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-01597 Plaintiffs, Hon. Colleen Kollar-Kotelly v. Donald J. Trump, et al., Defendants. BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE NATIONAL CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER EQUALITY, TENNESSEE TRANSGENDER POLITICAL COALITION, TGI NETWORK OF RHODE ISLAND, TRANSGENDER ALLIES GROUP, TRANSGENDER LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND, TRANSOHIO, TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NEW MEXICO, AND SOUTHERN ARIZONA GENDER ALLIANCE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Case 1:17-cv-01597-CKK Document 52-1 Filed 10/16/17 Page 2 of 34 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION & INTEREST OF AMICI ................................................................................ 1 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 4 I. THE BAN IS THE PRODUCT OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL ANIMUS TOWARD TRANSGENDER PEOPLE................................................................................................ 5 A. The Animus Behind The Ban Is Apparent From The Categorical Nature Of The Ban As Well As The Circumstances Of Its Announcement ......................................... 5 1. Clear evidence of animus is available on Twitter ................................................... 5 2. The ban is a direct response to hate groups’ lobbying and political maneuvering over the border wall .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Right Joined by Common Core Opposition
    It’s Perfectly Traditional: Christian Right Joined by Common Core Opposition A Summary Report on Sexuality Education Controversies, 2013-2014 Alex DiBranco PhD Student Yale University Kurt Conklin MPH, MCHES Director of Programs Contributors: Emily Ike Greg Tartaglione Emer Valdez With support from The Robert Sterling Clark Foundation 1 Table of Contents 2 Introduction: Common Core as Hard Core – Old Whine in New Bottles 3 Sexualizing Common Core: Tactics Stranger than Fiction Alabama / Colorado / Ohio / Arizona / New York / Missouri / Arkansas 11 Religious Right in Secular Drag: No to Condoms, No to Curricula Oregon / Delaware / Illinois / Kansas / California 18 Opposition Attacks Planned Parenthood in a FLASH Arizona / Tennessee 20 Reading Is Fundamentalist: Higher Ed Discovers Threats to Watch Out For South Carolina 22 Homecoming Tradition Turns Into Royal Controversy Pennsylvania / California / New Hampshire / North Carolina / Florida / Texas / DC 26 Of Playwrights and Poets: All the World’s a Stage for Censorship Arizona / Connecticut / Nebraska 31 Exposures and Coverups: School Struggle with Double Standards, Privacy, & Porn Florida / Utah 34 Frauds Defrocked: Students & Parents Push Back Against Phony Sex Ed ‘Experts’ Missouri / North Carolina / Minnesota 40 Conclusion: 50 & Fit – Fighting for a Sexually Healthy America Cover photo: Opponents of the Common Core State Standards in English and Math were visible at numerous public rallies around the nation in 2013-14. Not all opponents were politically conservative: the nonprofit education news-gathering organization Chalkbeat New York captured this scene at Gotham’s City Hall. Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/chalkbeatny/14037889259 2 Introduction: Common Core as Hard Core – Old Whine in New Bottles Last year SIECUS highlighted the significance of the digital generation in sexuality education controversies involving new technologies, from alarm over “sexting” to the savvy use of Twitter to protest abstinence-only-until-marriage programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Confess the Gay Away? Media, Religion, and the Political Economy of Ex-Gay Therapy
    Confess the Gay Away? Media, Religion, and the Political Economy of Ex-gay Therapy Michael Thorn A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO April 2015 ©Michael Thorn, 2015 ii Abstract The “ex-gay” movement does not encourage people to pray the gay away but confess the gay away. As a loose organization of mostly Christian ministries and psychotherapy practices that offers “freedom from homosexuality,” the movement offers religious and psychological confessions of sin and disease and testimonies of truth and belief as technologies of both self- sacrifice and identity formation. The aim is to control unwanted same-sex desire through life- long labour and struggle so as to sacrifice one’s gay or lesbian identity for an ex-gay identity. However, in the debate surrounding the movement, those opposed use confessions of trauma and harm, and testimonies of their own truth and belief, to try and sacrifice the movement in favour of gay and lesbian identities. Confession and testimony, then, which are two sides of the same coin, underlie the discourses and practices of all involved in ex-gay truth games. In the 1970s and 80s the ex-gay movement operated in the shadows of Christianity as an embarrassing secret. This dissertation analyzes the movement from the 1990s, when, in alliance with the Christian Right, it “came out of the closet” through a cross-platform advertising campaign that generated fifteen years’ worth of “earned media” in news and popular culture entertainment.
    [Show full text]
  • Missing Voices
    University of Missouri Center on Religion & the Professions Missing Voices: A study of religious voices in Mainstream Media reports about LGBT equality By Debra L. Mason, PhD and Cathy Ellen Rosenholtz, MDiv. April 11, 2012 Copyright 2012 Center on Religion & the Professions 30 Neff Annex Columbia, MO 65211 T 573-882-9257 F 573-884-0977 [email protected] University of Missouri Center on Religion & the Professions Contents Acknowledgments 3 Executive Summary 4 Introduction 5 Methodology and Findings 10 Conclusions and Discussion 20 References 23 Appendix A: Detailed Methodology 27 Appendix B: Complete descriptive statistics and correlations 32 Appendix C: Codebook and variable descriptions 45 Appendix D: Positive and negative messages 53 Appendix E: List of sources 99 Appendix F: Researcher biographies 130 Missing Voices: A study of religious voices in Mainstream Media reports about LGBT equality | January 2012 University of Missouri Center on Religion & the Professions Acknowledgements This study had its origins in summer 2011 at the invitation of the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD). This research significantly benefited from a literature search and past research by University of Missouri doctoral student, the Rev. Cathy Ellen Rosenholtz. Rosenholtz created the coding structure and enunciated the concepts used in the final study. Caitlin Giddings was an able and committed coder for all the content, helping us to assure accuracy and consistency. Director Ken Fleming and Program Coordinator Sarah J. Samson at Missouri’s Center for Advanced Social Research made sure the data were entered with integrity and accuracy. The Center on Religion & the Professions would also like to thank the University of Missouri for its support of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Gorsuch's Extreme Lobby: the Backgrounds of the Anti-LGBTQ
    Gorsuch’s Extreme Lobby: The Backgrounds Of The Anti-LGBTQ and Anti-Choice Groups Supporting Trump’s Nominee A number of extreme organizations have come out supporting Neil Gorsuch’s SCOTUS nomination, linking him to their anti-choice, anti-LGBTQ, and anti-women agendas—including groups that think birth control should be illegal, that claim through abortion “we are committing a 9/11 almost every day,” that have opposed marriage equality and adoption by LGBTQ parents, that said transgender people suffered from mental illness, and that believe the government should execute abortion providers. In This Document: Students for Life Family Research Council American Values Operation Rescue Faith and Freedom Coalition Family Policy Alliance Susan B. Anthony List Americans United for Life Focus on the Family Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) Human Coalition Live Action And Then There Were None Students For Life Students For Life Published A Statement Titled “SCOTUS Nomination Of Judge Neil Gorsuch Is Awesome” That Said “We At Students For Life Are Very Happy With This Pick!” In a statement, President Kristan Hawkins wrote, “We are thrilled with Judge Neil Gorsuch’s nomination to the US Supreme Court by President Trump, who is continuing to fulfill campaign promises at a breakneck speed. A strict Constitutionalist and firm supporter of religious freedom and liberties dictated by the Founding Fathers, Judge Gorsuch is an excellent replacement for the late Justice Scalia, and one who has the potential to leave a powerful legacy.” [Students for Life, 1/31/17] Students For Life President Kristan Hawkins Said “In My Ideal World,” Birth Control Pills And IUDs Would Be Illegal.
    [Show full text]
  • Working for Inclusion: Time for Congress to Enact Federal Legislation to Address Workplace Discrimination Against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Americans
    U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS WORKING FOR INCLUSION TIME FOR CONGRESS TO ENACT FEDERAL LEGISLATION TO ADDRESS WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER AMERICANS BRIEFING REPORT U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Washington, DC 20425 Official Business NOVEMBER 2017 Penalty for Private Use $300 Visit us on the Web: www.usccr.gov U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, Catherine E. Lhamon, Chairperson bipartisan agency established by Congress in 1957. It is Patricia Timmons-Goodson, Vice Chairperson directed to: Debo P. Adegbile Gail L. Heriot • Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are Peter N. Kirsanow being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their David Kladney race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national Karen Narasaki origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices. Michael Yaki • Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution Mauro Morales, Staff Director because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. • Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to U.S. Commission on Civil Rights discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or Washington, DC 20425 national origin, or in the administration of justice. (202) 376-8128 voice • Serve as a national clearinghouse for information TTY Relay: 711 in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, www.usccr.gov religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin.
    [Show full text]
  • Ungodly Genders: Deconstructing Ex-Gay Movement Discourses of “Transgenderism” in the US
    social sciences $€ £ ¥ Article Ungodly Genders: Deconstructing Ex-Gay Movement Discourses of “Transgenderism” in the US Christine M. Robinson * and Sue E. Spivey Department of Justice Studies, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-540-568-5958 Received: 8 April 2019; Accepted: 24 May 2019; Published: 17 June 2019 Abstract: This research investigates a neglected topic within both transgender studies and religious studies by analyzing ex-gay movement discourses of “transgenderism” from the 1970s to the present, focusing primarily on the US-American context. The oppression of transgender people in the US and globally is fed and fueled by the religious, scientific, and political discourses of the transnational “ex-gay” movement, which provides the ideological and material foundation of Christian Right politics. Using critical discourse analysis of ex-gay texts, we analyze the implications of these discourses in the individual, interactional, and institutional dimensions of society’s gender structure. This movement is one of the most insidious—and overlooked—sources of cisgenderism and transmisogyny today, constructing gender variance as sin, mental illness, and danger—with catastrophic consequences for transgender people, and those along the transfemale/feminine spectrum in particular. Finally, we discuss the public policy implications of these discourses. Keywords: transgender; religion; ex-gay movement; cisgenderism; transmisogyny 1. Introduction If 2014 represented an historic “tipping point” of visibility and progress for transgender Americans (Steinmetz 2014), the vicious, violent backlash that ensued stains the present. Scholarship analyzing the machinations that incite these harms is urgent. This research investigates a neglected topic within both transgender studies and religious studies by deconstructing and analyzing ex-gay movement discourses of “transgenderism”,1 emphasizing the US-American context.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Religious Right and James Dobson's
    Ad Americam. Journal of American Studies 14 (2013): 113-138 ISSN 1896-9461 DOI: 10.12797/AdAmericam.14.2013.14.08 Paulina Napierała Institute of American Studies and Polish Diaspora Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland The American Religious Right and James Dobson’s “Family Values Empire” The aim of this article is to discuss the role of such organizations as the Family Research Council and Focus on the Family, which together constitute what is sometimes called Dr. James Dobson’s “family values empire.” Both of these organizations are an important part of the American Religious Right movement. While the Family Research Council has been extremely important in terms of political involvement, it would probably not have been able to gain its strength without cooperation with Focus on the Family, which in many cases served as a tool in its grassroots networking. Therefore, this paper includes an analysis of both organizations’ agendas. Introduction “Of all the shifts and surprises in contemporary political life, perhaps none was so wholly unexpected as the political resurgence of evangelical Protestantism in the late 1970s” (Wald, Calhoun ‑Brown 202). According to many researchers fascinated with modernization and secularization theories, traditional religion was a “spent force” in American life and politics. And yet, by the end of the 1970s, an evangelical1 1 The term “evangelicalism” is very broad. Generally, it is an interdenominational re‑ vivalist movement within Protestantism, which has its roots in German pietism and Wesley‑ an Methodism. It became popular in America through the 18th and 19th ‑century Great Awak‑ enings. Evangelicals emphasize the experience of an intense personal conversion (new‑birth) received thanks to faith and God’s grace, literal understanding of the Bible and missionary work.
    [Show full text]