Impacts of the Route 25 Bypass on the Cranberry Highway in Wareham, Massachusetts
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Improving the Interstate Highway System Chase Minor [email protected]
The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Williams Honors College, Honors Research The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors Projects College Fall 2019 Improving the Interstate Highway System Chase Minor [email protected] Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects Part of the Geographic Information Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Minor, Chase, "Improving the Interstate Highway System" (2019). Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects. 897. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/honors_research_projects/897 This Honors Research Project is brought to you for free and open access by The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors College at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Williams Honors College, Honors Research Projects by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Improving Interstate Highway System 1 Improving the Interstate Highway System Honors Thesis Project Presented to The University of Akron Honors College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Geography: GIS Bachelors of Science Chase A. Minor Spring 2019 Improving Interstate Highway System 2 Abstract The Interstate Highway System is the primary transportation network of the United States. The Interstate Highway System has succeeded and failed in certain ways in connecting the United States. It is important that new interstate highways are added so that the United States will be better connected. -
Highway 71 Improvement Study I Executive Summary This Page Intentionally Left Blank
HIGHWAY 71 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT STUDY BELLA VISTA BYPASS – MISSOURI STATE LINE BENTON COUNTY Executive Summary DRAFT December 2017 Highway 71 Corridor Improvement Study Bella Vista Bypass to Missouri State Line BENTON COUNTY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared by the Transportation Planning and Policy Division Arkansas Department of Transportation In cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration This report was funded in part by the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Department of Transportation. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NOTICE OF NONDISCRIMINATION The Arkansas Department of Transportation (Department) complies with all civil rights provisions of federal statutes and related authorities that prohibit discrimination in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. Therefore, the Department does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color, age, national origin, religion (not applicable as a protected group under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Title VI Program), disability, Limited English Proficiency (LEP), or low-income status in the admission, access to and treatment in the Department’s programs and activities, as well as the Department’s hiring or employment practices. Complaints of alleged discrimination and inquiries regarding the Department’s nondiscrimination policies may be directed to Joanna P. McFadden Section Head - EEO/DBE (ADA/504/Title VI Coordinator), P.O. Box 2261, Little Rock, AR 72203, (501) 569-2298, (Voice/TTY 711), or the following email address: [email protected] Free language assistance for the Limited English Proficient individuals is available upon request. This notice is available from the ADA/504/Title VI Coordinator in large print, on audiotape and in Braille. -
Download Bypass Basics Brochure
ity un m Bypass Basics om d C ze -Si ium Co Med nside and ring a Bypass in Your Small by•pass /ˈbīˌpas/ noun Prepared by CUTR for the a road passing around a town or its center to FDOT Systems Planning Office 2014 provide an alternative route for through traffic. www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/ - Google Dictionary Bypass Basics why build a bypass? Your community may be asked to consider a bypass to relieve traffic congestion and to improve travel time for those passing through – especially trucks. Desire for a bypass is increasing for state highways on Florida’s Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) that run through small- and medium-sized communities. This is because “SIS” highways are designated to provide for the statewide movement of people and goods and, therefore, are critical to the economy. is a bypass needed? Questions to ask Major state highways are often the main street in small and medium-sized Why is FDOT proposing a communities. This means they serve local, as well as regional, travel. bypass in this community? Freight and through traffic in these communities contribute to traffic congestion and have other adverse impacts on quality of life. A highway bypass may be appropriate where heavy truck traffic causes continuing unacceptable impacts, such as noise, fumes, and vibration. It may also Statistics from recently be appropriate where a high percentage of trips are just passing through completed bypasses in Florida: the community. In these situations, the bypass would significantly reduce traffic congestion and pollution. • Bypasses circumvent communities with populations ranging from 10,000 to Roadways on Florida’s Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) support economic 90,000–most with a population under 25,000. -
Economic Impacts of Highway Bypasses on Communities
The Economic Impacts of Highway Bypasses on Communities Summary A research project by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation January 1998 (reformatted in April of 1999 for Internet placement) 1 NOTICE: This research was funded by the Wisconsin Council on Research of the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The contents of this report reflect the research findings of the staff of WisDOT’s Economic Planning & Development Section, who are responsible for the accuracy of the data contained herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect official views or policies of WisDOT or FHWA at the time of publication. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of WisDOT and FHWA in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute policy standards, specifications or regulations. The United States Government does not endorse products or businesses. Trade, publication or product names may appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the research conducted in the study. 2 3 INTRODUCTION KEY PROJECT FINDINGS: Since 1980, there have been State Highway bypasses built around 17 Wisconsin communities. Through • In most communities, highway bypasses have the year 2010, at least 20 more bypasses are little adverse impact on overall economic anticipated for construction. activity. The economies of smaller communities have a greater potential to be adversely impacted by a bypass. Bypass plans often generate local concern about impacts on local commerce, development, land use, • Over the long term, average traffic levels on and general quality of life. -
Plymouth, Cape Cod and the Islands of Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket
Plymouth, Cape Cod and the Islands of Martha’s Vineyard & Nantucket A summer trip to Massachusetts could be well-spent on the beautiful coast! Start by taking advantage of the new Cape Flyer weekend rail service from Boston to Buzzards Bay or Hyannis – the site of the Kennedy family home. Trains will depart from Boston’s South Station every Friday, Saturday and Sunday May-October; return service the same days. capeflyer.com If you’re driving, take your time, stopping along the way to check out the many cranberry bogs throughout Plymouth County. Your first stop, however, should be in the town of Plymouth itself. As the landing location and subsequent settlement for the Mayflower's Pilgrims in 1620, Plymouth, just 40 minutes south of Boston, is home to one of the greatest dramas in the founding of America. And, it was here in 1621, where the Pilgrims celebrated what is now known as the first Thanksgiving with their Wampanoag neighbors. Situated about 40 miles south of Boston along Massachusetts' South Shore, Plymouth unfolds along a scenic harbor of blue waters and picturesque boats. In “America’s Hometown," you'll get a glimpse of Plymouth Rock — and the Pilgrim way of life – at Plimoth Plantation. This bi-cultural living history museum offers a re- created 17th century English Village that includes Colonial interpreters who bring the era to life, a Native Wampanoag Homesite, Crafts Center and numerous Museum Shops. The reproduction Mayflower II, a full-scale reproduction of the Pilgrims’ original ship is located at State Pier just a stone’s throw from Plymouth Rock, that historic piece of granite thought to be the stepping stone for these courageous settlers into the New World. -
Roadway &Traffic Operations Strategy
ESTABLISHING MULTI-MODAL STRATEGIES | CHAPTER 4 ROADWAY & TRAFFIC OPERATIONS STRATEGY To serve planned growth, the future transportation system needs multi-modal improvements and strategies to manage the forecasted travel demand. This chapter presents a detailed strategy to improve Moscow’s roadway network and traffic operations over the next 20 years, including network connectivity options, regional circulation enhancements, intersection modifications, and multi-modal street design guidelines. MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN This page intentionally left blank. Moscow on the Move 4 ROADWAY & TRAFFIC OPERATIONS STRATEGY Supporting the guiding principles of Moscow on the Move, the Roadway & This Transportation Traffic Operations Strategy strives to provide a truly multi-modal Commission “check mark” icon signifies transportation system and improve safety, access, and mobility for all street which actions have unanimous users by identifying strategies, policies, and projects that help achieve support from the Commission. Moscow’s vision for mobility and access. This strategy of Moscow on the Move The icon is a way to illustrate the level of support for identifies opportunities to retrofit existing streets in Moscow and develops the implementation. street grid to improve citywide connectivity for motor vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users. This strategy specifically provides an overview of the existing traffic conditions and how conditions might change by 2035, a street network plan, various design tools that could be applied throughout the city, and descriptions of recommended street projects. FUTURE DEFICIENCIES AND NEEDS Existing and future roadway and traffic operation conditions were assessed to determine the needs and deficiencies of the system. The key areas projected to require improvement or to present future challenges are summarized below. -
The Effects of Highway Bypasses on Rural Communities and Small Urban
NCHRP National Cooperative Highway Research Program RnsEnncH REsurrs DIcEST Number 210 Subjcct Arca: IA Planning and Adrninistration Responsible Senior Progranr Oflìcer: Scott A. .Sabol EFFECTS OF HIGHWAY BYPASSES ON RURAL COMMUNITIES AND SMALL URBAN AREAS c.. I This RRD is a staf digest of a study cottducted as part of NCHRP Project 20-5, " Synthesis of Information Related- to llighway Problerns," for which the Transportatiott Research Board is tlrc agency conducting tlrc research. The Principal Investigator responsible for this project is Sally D. I.iff, Manager, Synthesis Studies, serving under the Studies and lnþrmation Services Division of the Board. Dr. Jesse Bufington and Ms. Katie Womack, of the Texas Transporhrion Institute were responsible for data collection, initial analyses and report preparation. Dr. Andrew C. I-emer conducted additional analyses and prepared the final text. INTRODUCTION challenged decision makers. Transportation planners seek to improve transportation system efficiency by In the late fall of 1964, a new highway bypass constructing bypasses, while people in the towns to be around Cherokee,Iowa (1990 population 6,026) opened bypassed protest the diversion of traffic that some view to t¡affic. l¡cal business people had actively opposed as their sotuce of livelihootl. Such issues are particu- the construction, t'earing that traffic diverted from the larly acute in rural communities and small urban a¡eas, main route ttuough town would take sales with it. Just where highway orienæd development may account for a over two decades later, the former o\uìer of a clothing substantial proportion of the local economy. store in Cherokee echoetl the views of many others in the town when he concluded that he and others had over-reacted: the bypass did not hurt retail sales. -
Director, Public Works Re: Cape Cod Canal Transportation Study (Draft)
DATE: JUNE 21, 2019 TO: JUILAN SUSO – TOWN MANAGER FROM: RAYMOND A. JACK – DIRECTOR, PUBLIC WORKS RE: CAPE COD CANAL TRANSPORTATION STUDY (DRAFT) MassDOT has released their Draft Cape Cod Canal Transportation Study for public comment. Comments are due NLT June 20th, 2019. Initiated in 2014, the study has been five years in the making. The purpose of the study is to: “…evaluate existing and future transportation safety and congestion deficiencies in the Cape Cod Canal study area.” with the goal to “Improve transportation mobility and accessibility in the Cape Cod Canal area and provide year-round connectivity over the canal and between the Sagamore and Bourne Bridges.” In general, the study focuses on relieving congestion and improving multi-modal access within the study area which generally includes both bridges, their N & S approaches, the canal roads (Sandwich Rd. along the south and Scenic Hwy. along the north) and, to a limited extent, the section of Rt. 6 eastbound from the Sagamore bridge to exit 2 (Rt. 130). Evaluation criteria were grouped into six categories: 1) Transportation; 2) Environment; 3) Community; 4) Land Use / Economic Development; 5) Safety and 6) Feasibility. Potential solutions / improvements were grouped in seven different “Case” scenarios identified as Case 1, 1A, 1B, 2, 2B, 3 and 3A as described below. Case 3-A is the recommended set of solutions to address the widest variety of needs, but is also the most costly. Case 3 and 3-A both presume bridge replacements – the primary difference between the two are that case 3-A presumes a Highway Interchange at the Bourne rotary, thus the Rt. -
Bella Vista Bypass Safety Analysis Introduction a Safety Analysis
Bella Vista Bypass Safety Analysis Introduction A safety analysis was conducted for the Highway 71 corridor between Highway 71B interchange south of the City of Bella Vista and Highway H south of Pineville (study area). The analysis considered crashes occurring in years 2006 and 2007, and examined crashes by severity, and crashes by type of impact. Additional crash data analysis for earlier years can be found in the Final Environmental Impact Statement completed in 2000. In 2006, there were 93 crashes in Arkansas, and 65 crashes in Missouri. In 2007, the Arkansas portion of the study area had 100 crashes, with 77 crashes in Missouri. This is an average number of crashes of 168 crashes per year within the entire corridor. Crash Rates Arkansas study area crash rates for the existing corridor were 1.27 crashes per million vehicle miles (MVM) in 2006, and 1.23 crashes per MVM in 2007. Comparatively, the statewide average crash rates were 2.37 and 2.50 for years 2006 and 2007, respectively, for similar facility types. Crash rates for the existing corridor in Missouri were 1.25 crashes per MVM and 1.49 crashes per MVM for 2006 and 2007, respectively. The statewide average crash rate in Missouri for similar type facilities was 1.53 crashes per MVM in 2007. Severity of Crashes Table S-1 displays the number and severity of crashes that have occurred along existing Highway 71 within the study area. Over the two-year study period, there were a total of 7 crashes that resulted in 7 fatalities, 134 crashes that resulted in 317 people injured, and 194 crashes that resulted in property damage only. -
Bourne Bridge Rotary Study Bourne, Massachusetts
Bourne Bridge Rotary Study Bourne, Massachusetts March 2014 Participants Bourne Transportation Advisory Committee Committee Members Wesley Ewell, Chair Robert Parady, Vice-Chair Sallie Riggs, Secretary Daniel L. Doucette Michael A. Blanton Cindy Parola John Carroll Dennis Woodside, Chief of Police George Sala, Highway Superintendent Ex-Officio Thomas Guerino, Town Administrator Jon Nelson, Facilities Manager Cape Cod Commission Project Team Glenn D. Cannon, Technical Services Director Lev Malakhoff, Senior Transportation Engineer Steve Tupper, Technical Services Planner Sharon Rooney, Chief Planner Ryan Bennet, Planner II Heather McElroy, Natural Resources Specialist Leslie Richardson, Chief Economic Development Officer James Sherrard, Hydrologist Bret Whitely, GIS Analyst Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 1 Study Area .......................................................................................................................... 2 Literature Review ............................................................................................................... 3 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 5 Base Year Traffic Volumes ................................................................................................ -
Cape Cod Canal Highway Bridges Bourne, Massachusetts
Major Rehabilitation Evaluation Report And Environmental Assessment Cape Cod Canal Highway Bridges Bourne, Massachusetts US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS New England District March 2020 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Reverse of Front Cover Front Cover Photograph: Looking Southwest through the Bourne Bridge to the Railroad Bridge at Buzzards Bay Cape Cod Canal Federal Navigation Project Bourne, Massachusetts Major Rehabilitation Evaluation Report Cape Cod Canal Highway Bridges March 2020 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Reverse of Front Title Sheet Cape Cod Canal Highway Bridges Major Rehabilitation Evaluation Study Executive Summary This Major Rehabilitation Evaluation Report (MRER) presents the results of a study examining the relative merits of rehabilitating or replacing the two high-level highway bridges, the Bourne and Sagamore, which cross the Cape Cod Canal, and are part of the Cape Cod Canal Federal Navigation Project (FNP) operated and maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), New England District (NAE). The USACE completes a MRER whenever infrastructure maintenance construction costs are expected to exceed $20 million and take more than two years of construction to complete. The MRER is a four-part evaluation: a structural engineering risk and reliability analysis of the current structures, cost engineering, economic analysis, and environmental evaluation of all feasible alternatives. The MRER is intended only as a means of determining the likely future course of action relative to rehabilitation or replacement. While conceptual plans were developed in order to facilitate the analysis no final determination has been made as to the final location or type of any new Canal crossings. Those would be determined in the next phase of the study and design effort. -
DIRECTIONS to from Logan Airport/Boston, MA Merge Onto I
DIRECTIONS TO From Logan Airport/Boston, MA Merge onto I-90 West/Mass Pike/Ted Williams Tunnel. Take Exit 24 towards I-93. Take the I-93 South exit on the left. Merge onto MA-3 South for 51 miles. Go over Sagamore Bridge, and take Exit 1. At bottom of ramp take a left onto MA-6A/Sandwich Road. Enter roundabout and take third exit onto Gen. McArthur Blvd/MA-28 South. Follow for 4 miles. Enter next roundabout and take second exit onto MA-28 South. After 3 miles, take the exit for Route 151towards Mashpee/Hyannis/New Seabury. Turn slight right onto MA-151/Nathan Ellis Highway and follow for 1 mile. Turn right onto Falmouth Woods Road. Estimated time: 1 hour 25 minutes, 69 miles. From TF Green Airport/Providence, RI Start going northeast and take the US-1 ramp towards Post Road/Exit. Turn right onto Post Rd/US-1. Merge onto RI-37 West towards I-95. Merge onto I-95 North via Exit 4B. Travel for 6 miles then merge onto I-195 via Exit 20 towards East Providence/Cape Cod. Stay on I-195 for 44 miles. Merge onto MA-25 East via Exit 22A toward Cape Cod. Take MA-25 over the Bourne Bridge when it becomes MA-28 S. Enter roundabout and take second exit onto Gen. McArthur Blvd/MA-28 South. Follow for 4 miles. Enter next roundabout and take second exit onto MA-28 South. After 3 miles, take the exit for Route 151 towards Mashpee/Hyannis/New Seabury.