DOCSLIB.ORG

Idaho Department of Fish and Game

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Idaho Department of Fish and Game IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME Steven M. Huffaker, Director Project W-160-R-31 Progress Report HELLS CANYON BIGHORN SHEEP Study I: Hells Canyon Bighorn Sheep Restoration Plan July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2004 By: Francis Cassirer Wildlife Research Biologist September 2004 Boise, Idaho Findings in this report are preliminary in nature and not for publication without permission of the Director of the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. The Idaho Department of Fish and Game adheres to all applicable state and federal laws and regulations related to discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, gender, or handicap. If you feel you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility of the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, or if you desire further information, please write to: Idaho Department of Fish and Game, PO Box 25, Boise, ID 83707; or the Office of Human Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240. This publication will be made available in alternative formats upon request. Please contact the Idaho Department of Fish and Game for assistance. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................2 GOAL ........................................................................................................................................2 OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................................2 ACTIONS ..................................................................................................................................3 PROJECT AREA.............................................................................................................................3 POPULATION MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT ..............................................................4 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................4 HELLS CANYON INITIATIVE 1997-2003 ............................................................................4 FUTURE DIRECTION .............................................................................................................6 Adult Survival......................................................................................................................6 Lamb Survival......................................................................................................................6 Population Growth...............................................................................................................6 REINTRODUCTIONS AND RELOCATIONS..............................................................................7 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................7 HELLS CANYON INITIATIVE 1997-2003 ............................................................................7 FUTURE DIRECTION .............................................................................................................7 Disease Testing ....................................................................................................................8 Release Sites ........................................................................................................................8 Source Populations...............................................................................................................9 HABITAT........................................................................................................................................9 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................9 Habitat Availability..............................................................................................................9 Domestic Sheep Grazing Allotments.................................................................................10 HELLS CANYON INITIATIVE 1997-2003 ..........................................................................11 Habitat Acquisitions...........................................................................................................11 Water Developments..........................................................................................................11 Forage Quality ...................................................................................................................11 Weed Control.....................................................................................................................12 Wildfire..............................................................................................................................12 W-160-R-31-xxx Hells Canyon Bighorn Sheep i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Domestic Sheep Allotments...............................................................................................12 FUTURE DIRECTION ...........................................................................................................12 Habitat Evaluation .............................................................................................................12 Landscape Level ....................................................................................................12 Fine Scale...............................................................................................................13 Public Land Domestic Sheep and Goat Allotments...............................................13 Private Land Domestic Sheep and Goats...............................................................14 Future Habitat Improvements ................................................................................14 RESEARCH...................................................................................................................................15 BACKGROUND .....................................................................................................................15 HELLS CANYON INITIATIVE 1997-2003 ..........................................................................15 FUTURE DIRECTION ...........................................................................................................17 HARVEST .....................................................................................................................................17 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION..............................................................................18 ANNUAL REPORT ................................................................................................................18 OTHER COMMUNICATIONS ..............................................................................................19 MEETINGS .............................................................................................................................19 PUBLICATIONS AND REPORTS ........................................................................................19 BUDGET .......................................................................................................................................19 BUDGET VARIANCES .........................................................................................................19 RESTORATION COMMITTEE...................................................................................................20 LITERATURE CITED ..................................................................................................................21 APPENDICES ...............................................................................................................................39 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Hells Canyon bighorn sheep habitat model. ................................................................31 Table 2. Extent and ownership of potential bighorn sheep habitat in 1997 Hells Canyon habitat analysis area. ....................................................................................................31 Table 3. Hells Canyon Project Area bighorn sheep herd sizes, March 1997 and 2003.............32 Table 4. Comparison of Hells Canyon bighorn sheep herd annual growth rates after initial release and in subsequent years.........................................................................32 Table 5. Hells Canyon bighorn sheep sampling protocol. .........................................................33 W-160-R-31-xxx Hells Canyon Bighorn Sheep ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) Table 6. Bighorn sheep transplants in Hells Canyon, 1997-2003..............................................33 Table 7. Potential supplemental bighorn release sites, 2004-2007............................................34 Table 8. Wildfires in the Hells Canyon Project Area, 1986-1995. ............................................34 Table 9. Habitat improvements, Hells Canyon Project Area through 2003. .............................35 Table 10. Wildfires in the Hells Canyon Project Area, 1996-2003. ............................................36 Table 11. Permits and harvest of bighorn sheep in Hells Canyon through 2003.........................37 Table 12. Projected annual costs for restoration of bighorn sheep in Hells Canyon, FY 2005 ─ FY 2007. ...................................................................................................38
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2009 Washington Game Status and Trend Report
    S T A T E O F W A S H I N G T O N 20092009 GameGame StatusStatus andand TrendTrend ReportReport AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 2009 GAME STATUS AND TREND REPORT July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA 98501-1091 STATE OF WASHINGTON Chris Gregoire Governor WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Phil Anderson Interim Director WILDLIFE PROGRAM Dave Brittell Assistant Director GAME DIVISION Dave Ware Game Division Manager This Program Receives Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration, Project W-96-R, Statewide Wildlife Management. This report should be cited as: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2009. 2009 Game status and trend report. Wildlife Program, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington, USA. TABLE OF CONTENTS Deer .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Statewide Summary .................................................................................................................. 3 Region 1, PMUs 11, 13, GMUs 101-124 ................................................................................. 6 Region 1, PMUs 14, 15, GMUs 127-142 ............................................................................... 11 Region 1, PMUs 16, 17, GMUs 145-186 ............................................................................... 15 Region 2, PMUs 21, 22, GMUs 203-243 ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife-Habitat Relationships of the Grande Ronde River
    Wildlife-Habitat Relationships of the Grande Ronde River by Aryn E. Hayden ABSTRACT In selecting habitat animal species require food, water and adequate cover. When these criteria are taken into account it appears that habitats utilized by terrestrial wildlife along the Grande Ronde River change longitudinally from mixed conifer forests to ponderosa pine forests in the headwaters and middle reaches to grassland and shrub-steppe in the lower reaches. Species diversity of mammals, birds and reptiles within these habitats will also decrease towards the lower reaches to some degree as habitat changes along the Grande Ronde River. A potential decrease in species diversity as habitat changes may indicate that habitat specialist species are more likely to be found in the headwaters of and middle reaches while habitat generalists are likely to be found in the middle and lower reaches of the Grande Ronde River. This concept of decreasing species diversity in a downstream gradient indicates that the River Continuum Concept, traditionally an aquatic hypothesis, may have some applicability to distributions of terrestrial wildlife in the context of riverine ecosystems. Species diversity of terrestrial wildlife is also heavily influenced by the presence of riparian vegetation along the river. Riparian vegetation is likely to be found within the headwaters and middle reaches of the Grande Ronde River and in patches pertaining to locations of physical complexity along the river such as confluences with tributaries. Riparian vegetation provides complex habitat for mammals and birds that live along the river and those that utilize riparian habitat for foraging, water requirements, migration or other activities necessary for survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
    Attachment 2 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ARCHIVES DIVISION BEV CLARNO STEPHANIE CLARK SECRETARY OF STATE INTERIM DIRECTOR A. RICHARD VIAL 800 SUMMER STREET NE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE SALEM, OR 97310 503-373-0701 NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING INCLUDING STATEMENT OF NEED & FISCAL IMPACT FILED 07/19/2019 2:56 PM CHAPTER 635 ARCHIVES DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SECRETARY OF STATE FILING CAPTION: 2020 Big Game Controlled Hunt Tag Numbers, Season Dates and Regulations LAST DAY AND TIME TO OFFER COMMENT TO AGENCY: 09/13/2019 5:00 PM The Agency requests public comment on whether other options should be considered for achieving the rule's substantive goals while reducing negative economic impact of the rule on business. CONTACT: Roxann Borisch 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive SE Filed By: 503-947-6314 Salem,OR 97302 Roxann Borisch [email protected] Rules Coordinator HEARING(S) Auxilary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon advance request. Notify the contact listed above. DATE: 09/13/2019 TIME: 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM OFFICER: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Commissioners ADDRESS: The Event Center 29392 Ellensburg Ave Gold Beach, OR 97444 NEED FOR THE RULE(S): This action is necessary to set 2020 hunting season regulations and controlled hunt tag numbers for game mammals. DOCUMENTS RELIED UPON, AND WHERE THEY ARE AVAILABLE: A copy of the rules and the other documents relied upon for this rulemaking are available from the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Wildlife Division, 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive SE, Salem, Oregon 97302-1142, between the hours of 8:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of a Conference on Native Plant Restoration and Management on Public Lands in the Pacific Northwest
    Proceedings of a Conference on Native Plant Restoration and Management on Public Lands in the Pacific Northwest: Rare Plants, Invasive Species and Ecosystem Management LaSells Stewart Center, Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon Feb. 11-13, 2003 Edited and compiled by Thomas N. Kaye, Melanie Gisler, and Rob Fiegener A symposium co-sponsored by: USDI Bureau of Land Management, Institute for Applied Ecology, USDA Forest Service, Native Plant Society of Oregon Proceedings of a Conference on Native Plant Restoration and Management on Public Lands in the Pacific Northwest: Rare Plants, Invasive Species, and Ecosystem Management , Corvallis, Oregon, Feb. 11-13, 2003 Preface: Native plant conservation is a multi-disciplinary field and its success requires an integrated approach. Plant restoration and management on public lands in the Pacific Northwest face many challenges but also present opportunities for cooperative projects, research, on-the- ground action, and community outreach. On February 11-13, 2003, 300 people joined together for a symposium on native plant management in the Pacific Northwest to share information and discuss experiences. Topics covered rare and endangered species conservation and reintroduction, invasive plants, species and habitat restoration, ecosystems, and policy. The meeting featured talks by experts in these fields, and the audience included biologists, land managers, non-profit organizations, and the general public. Michael Way, a member of the International Team for the Millennium Seed Bank Project from the Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, was our keynote speaker. Mr. Way is the International Coordinator for the Americas and is responsible for the development of seed conservation projects with partners in Mexico, Chile, and the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Workbook Integrates the Facility Portion of the Agency Budget Submission with the Capital Project Advisory Board Submission
    1 The workbook integrates the facility portion of the Agency Budget Submission with the Capital Project Advisory Board Submission. 2 The definitions for budget priorities are the same in both documents. 2a Note: Priority # 4 has changed from Recommended Improvements to Seismic and Natural Hazard Remediation. Add your remediation estimates by building, if your agency has conducted this analysis. For agencies participating in the Facility Conditions Assessment Program, this assessment will be provided. 2b Priority #5 has changed from New Code Requirements/Standards to Modernization. This category combines the former #4 Recommended Improvements, and the former #5, New Code priority categories. It expands the definition to include replacement of facilities. See definition in the budget instructions and those included in the relevant forms. 3 Begin the workbook with the last 3 CPAB tabs. This data feeds much of the reaming workbook. These will be reviewed by CPAB only. If your agency has migrated to iPlan, the blue columns will come directly from the iPlan CPAB reports. IF your agency has not migrated to iPlan, please self-report your information. 3a CPAB Current Priority 1-4 is for current needs as of April 2020 to align with the PICS reporting budget instructions. 3b CPAB 10 Year Priority 1-4 gives your agency the opportunity to give the 10 year projected needs for your building portfolio. 3c CPAB Priority 5 are not generally part of an FCA, rather they are needs that are driven by program and function. New buildings and major building refresh/renovations would generally be included in priority #5.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Washington Game Status and Trend Report
    S T A T E O F W A S H I N G T O N 20102010 GameGame StatusStatus andand TrendTrend ReportReport AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 2010 GAME STATUS AND TREND REPORT July 1, 2009 – June 30, 2010 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA 98501-1091 STATE OF WASHINGTON Chris Gregoire Governor WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Phil Anderson Director WILDLIFE PROGRAM Nate Pamplin Acting Assistant Director GAME DIVISION Dave Ware Game Division Manager This Program Receives Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration, Project W-96-R, Statewide Wildlife Management. This report should be cited as: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2010. 2010 Game status and trend report. Wildlife Program, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, Washington, USA. TABLE OF CONTENTS Deer .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Region 1, PMUs 11, 13, GMUs 101-124 ................................................................................. 3 Region 1, PMUs 14, 15, GMUs 127-142 ................................................................................. 8 Region 1, PMUs 16, 17, GMUs 145-186 ............................................................................... 13 Region 2, PMUs 21, 22, GMUs 203-243 ............................................................................... 16 Region 2, PMUs 21, 23, 26 GMUs 243-269 .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Model Predicts Marten Age Based On
    cience ccomplishments D E E P R A U PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION R T LT MENT OF AGRICU Vision and Mission We are highly sought for our scientific leadership and impartial knowledge. Our mission is to generate and communicate scientific knowledge that helps people understand and make informed choices about people, natural resources, and the environment. Moose Pass, Chugach Range, south-central Alaska. Photo by Jon Williams. Contents 4 A Message From the Station Director 6 Pacific Northwest Research Station: The Setting 8 Highlights From 2011 16 Communications—Print, Web, and Twitter 18 Finances and Workforce 19 Funding Partners for 2011 20 Climate Change 28 Community Sustainability 36 Fire and Smoke 44 Forests and Grasslands 60 Watershed Health 70 Wildlife 78 Learning Events 84 Honors and Awards 86 PNW Research Station Organization 3 A Message From the Station Director 4 XPERTISE, dedication, and partner- Proximity to the campus, which is also home of ship: these are key elements to success the station-sponsored Alaska Coastal Rainforest within the Pacific Northwest Research Center, will facilitate collaborative research. Station. Fostering these elements enables The station remains a key supporter of the the station to generate timely scientific informa- Alaska Coastal Rainforest Center, which was Etion for land managers and policymakers to use for started in 2009 as a collaborative effort to expand decisions about managing natural resources. and enhance education and research opportunities In 2011, several projects examined among six partners. It now ecosystem processes across large has 14 partners, including the landscapes. The Integrated Land- LeBarge Tim Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes scape Assessment Project, for exam- of Alaska, the City of Juneau, ple, developed models for assessing British Columbia Ministry of wildlife habitat, fire risk, vegetation, Forestry, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Division 065 Game Mammal General Seasons and Regulations
    OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE DIVISION 065 GAME MAMMAL GENERAL SEASONS AND REGULATIONS 635-065-0001 Purpose and General Information (1) The purpose of these rules is to establish license and tag requirements, limits, areas, methods and other restrictions for hunting game mammals pursuant to ORS Chapter 496. (2) OAR chapter 635, division 065 incorporates, by reference, the requirements for hunting game mammals set out in the document entitled 2014 Oregon Big Game Regulations,” into Oregon Administrative Rules. Therefore, persons must consult the”2014 Oregon Big Game Regulations” in addition to OAR chapter 635, to determine all applicable requirements for game mammals. The annual Oregon Big Game Regulations are available at hunting license agents and regional, district, and headquarters offices, and website of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. [Publications: Publications referenced are available from the agency.] Stat. Auth.: ORS 496.012, 496.138, 496.146 & 496.162 Stats. Implemented: ORS 496.012, 496.138, 496.146 & 496.162 635-065-0006 General License Requirement A person may obtain and possess only one valid annual hunting license per calendar year. Stat. Auth.: ORS 183 & 496 Stats. Implemented: ORS 183 & 496 635-065-0011 Mandatory Reporting Penalty All big game tag holders, except for bighorn sheep and Rocky Mountain goat, and all turkey tag holders are required to report hunting effort and harvest. (1) Reporting deadlines for 2013-14 seasons are as follows: (a) January 31, 2014: For hunts ending between April 1 and December 31, 2013. (b) April 15, 2014: For hunts ending between January 1 and March 31, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon's Bighorn Sheep & Rocky Mountain Goat Management Plan
    December 2003 3406 Cherry Ave NE Salem, OR 97303 503-947-6300 COVER PHOTO CREDITS Right Top: Capturing the original mature California bighorn ram in Williams Lake, British Columbia before transport to Oregon in 1954 (Vic Masson). Right Bottom: Rocky Mountain goats in the Wallowa Mountains of northeastern Oregon (Vic Coggins, ODFW). Left Top: Modern net-gun capture technology using a helicopter and custom made transport bags to insure safety for animal and animal handlers (Nancy Smogar, ODFW). Left Bottom: A young California bighorn ram in the acclimation pen at Hart Mountain National Antelope Refuge prior to release in 1961 (Vic Masson). Suggested Citation: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2003. Oregon’s bighorn sheep and Rocky Mountain goat management plan. Salem, Oregon, USA. i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Two bighorn sheep subspecies are native to Oregon: Rocky Mountain and California bighorn sheep. Expansion of American civilization without wildlife protection or management, and domestic livestock diseases led to their extirpation from Oregon by the mid 1940's. Present populations are the result of reintroductions and occupy only a small percentage of historic ranges. Oregon now supports 12 Rocky Mountain bighorn herds with a population estimate of 637 animals, and 32 California bighorn herds with 3,700 animals. Land use changes have rendered much of the original wild sheep ranges unsuitable for occupancy, but there is still considerable suitable habitat into which bighorns have been, or can be re-established. The mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus) is perhaps the least recognized and least known of Oregon’s big game species. The goat’s obscurity is likely a result of the steep and rugged nature of its habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • July – August 2020
    BIG CHANGES OREGON ON HORIZON $3.95 July- August HUNTER 2020 FIND your Oregon Bucks & Bulls Big changes for east bow, Oregon Big cascade elk Game Outlook poaching charges may lead to big Primer for penalties Smokin’ hot: PRONGHORNS • Smokepole pronghorns Oregon Afield: • Blacktails • Bears of summer in the burns • Early Birds • Summer dog days Shop Online 24/7! www.asrvm.com NEW 2019 Jayco Hummingbird 17RB NEW 2019 Forest River Rpod 190 $ $ /mo SALE $19,888+ fees 176 SALE $19,888 + fees 176/mo OAC 10% down ($19,888) $176/month 144 months @ 5.99% APR* OAC 10% down ($1,988) $176/month 144 months @ 5.99% APR* MSRP $29,972 Stock# J2409 Vin# 3C0131 *tier 1 credit only MSRP $26,772 Stock# FR400 Vin# 016952 *tier 1 credit only NEW 2019 Jayco Jay Feather 23BHM 2018 Jayco Melbourne 24L - Rental Fleet Sell-Off! $ $ SALE $23,888+ fees 211/mo SALE $64,888 + fees 440/mo OAC 10% down ($2,388) $211/month 144 months @ 5.99% APR* OAC 20% down ($12,977) $440 month 180 months @ 5.99% APR* MSRP $38,907 Stock# J2481 Vin# JX0131 *tier 1 credit only MSRP $79,995 Stock# J2359 Vin# 721656 *tier 1 credit only NEW 2019 Jayco Seismic 4013 NEW 2020 ATC 36’ Fifth Wheel Toy Hauler New to ASRVM! $ $ SALE $88,888 + fees 605/mo SALE $106,888+ fees 725/mo OAC 20% down ($17,777) $605/month 180 months @ 5.99% APR* OAC 20% down ($21,377) $725/month 180 months @ 5.99% APR* MSRP $128,619 Stock# J2525 Vin# 9S0075 *tier 1 credit only MSRP $122,734 Stock# AT03 Vin# 220089 *tier 1 credit only Models & options vary.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Elk Herd Plan BLUE MOUNTAINS ELK HERD
    STATE OF WASHINGTON JAY INSLEE, GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE KELLY SUSEWIND, DIRECTOR WILDLIFE PROGRAM ERIC GARDNER, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR GAME DIVISION Anis Aoude, MANAGER This Program Receives Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration funds. Project W-96-R, Category A, Project 1 This report should be cited as: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2018. Blue Mountains Elk Herd. Wildlife Program, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia. 83 pp. This program receives Federal financial assistance from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. The U.S. Department of the Interior and its bureaus prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability or sex. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility, please write to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of External Programs, 4040 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 130, Arlington, VA 22203 i Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Washington State Elk Herd Plan BLUE MOUNTAINS ELK HERD Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Program 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA 98501-1091 Prepared by: Paul A. Wik Mark Vekasy Jerry Nelson Kevin Robinette Scott McCorquodale Pat E. Fowler Frederick C. Dobler June 2018 ___________________________________________ _______________ Director, Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Date ii Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Table of Contents Acknowledgments ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wenaha Wildlife Area Management Plan
    WENAHA WILDLIFE AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN April 2007 (Updated December 2017) Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 4034 Fairview Industrial Dr. SE Salem, Oregon 97302 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Plan ..................................................................................................... 1 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Mission and Authority ................................... 2 Purpose and Need of the Wenaha Wildlife Area ......................................................... 2 Wildlife Area Goals and Objectives .............................................................................. 2 Wildlife Area Establishment ......................................................................................... 3 Description and Environment ...................................................................................... 4 Physical Resources ..................................................................................................... 4 Location ................................................................................................................... 4 Climate ..................................................................................................................... 4 Topography and Soils .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]