Large-Scale Marine Protected Areas: Guidelines for Design and Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Large-Scale Marine Protected Areas: Guidelines for Design and Management IUCN WCPA’s BEST PRACTICE PROTECTED AREA GUIDELINES SERIES IUCN-WCPA’s Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines are the world’s authoritative resource for protected area managers. Involving collaboration among specialist practitioners dedicated to supporting better implementation of ideas in the field, the Guidelines distil learning and advice drawn from across IUCN. Applied in the field, they build institutional and individual capacity to manage protected area systems effectively, equitably and sustainably, and to cope with the myriad of challenges faced in practice. The Guidelines also assist national governments, protected area agencies, non-governmental organisations, communities and private sector partners in meeting their commitments and goals, and especially the Convention on Biological Diversity’s Programme of Work on Protected Areas. A full set of Guidelines is available at: www.iucn.org/pa_Guidelines Complementary resources are available at: www.cbd.int/protected/tools/ Contribute to developing capacity for a Protected Planet at: www.protectedplanet.net/ IUCN PROTECTED AREA DEFINITION, MANAGEMENT CATEGORIES AND GOVERNANCE TYPES IUCN defines a protected area as: A clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values. The definition is expanded by six management categories (one with a subdivision), summarised below. Ia. Strict nature reserve: Strictly protected for biodiversity and also possibly geological/geomorphological features, where human visitation, use and impacts are controlled and limited to ensure protection of the conservation values. Ib. Wilderness area: Usually large unmodified or slightly modified areas, retaining their natural character and influence, without permanent or significant human habitation, protected and managed to preserve their natural condition. II. National park: Large natural or near-natural areas protecting large-scale ecological processes with characteristic species and ecosystems, which also have environmentally and culturally compatible spiritual, scientific, educational, recreational and visitor opportunities. III. Natural monument or feature: Areas set aside to protect a specific natural monument, which can be a landform, seamount, marine cavern, geological feature such as a cave, or a living feature such as an ancient grove. IV. Habitat/species management area: Areas to protect particular species or habitats, where management reflects this priority. Many will need regular, active interventions to meet the needs of particular species or habitats, but this is not a requirement of the category. V. Protected landscape or seascape: Where the interaction of people and nature over time has produced a distinct character with significant ecological, biological, cultural and scenic value: and where safeguarding the integrity of this interaction is vital to protecting and sustaining the area and its associated nature conservation and other values. VI. Protected areas with sustainable use of natural resources: Areas which conserve ecosystems, together with associated cultural values and traditional natural resource management systems. Generally large, mainly in a natural condition, with a proportion under sustainable natural resource management (where low-level non-industrial natural resource use compatible with nature conservation is seen as one of the main aims). The category should be based around the primary management objective(s), which should apply to at least three-quarters of the protected area – the 75% rule. The management categories are applied with a typology of governance types – a description of who holds authority and responsibility for the protected area. IUCN defines four governance types. Type A. Governance by government: Federal or national ministry/agency in charge; sub-national ministry or agency in charge (e.g. at regional, provincial, municipal level); government-delegated management (e.g. to NGO). Type B. Shared governance: Trans-boundary governance (formal and informal arrangements between two or more countries); collaborative governance (through various ways in which diverse actors and institutions work together); joint governance (pluralist board or other multi-party governing body). Type C. Private governance: Conserved areas established and run by individual landowners; non-profit organisations (e.g. NGOs, universities) and for-profit organisations (e.g. corporate landowners). Type D. Governance by Indigenous peoples and local communities: Indigenous peoples’ conserved areas and territories - established and run by Indigenous peoples; community conserved areas – established and run by local communities. For more information on the IUCN definition, categories and governance types see Dudley (2008). Guidelines for applying protected area management categories, which can be downloaded at: www.iucn.org/pa_categories For more on governance types, see Borrini-Feyerabend, et al., (2013). Governance of Protected Areas – from understanding to action, which can be downloaded at https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/PAG-020.pdf Large-Scale Marine Protected Areas: Guidelines for design and management Prepared by Big Ocean and the IUCN WCPA Large-Scale MPA Task Force Authors: Nai‘a Lewis, Jon C. Day, ‘Aulani Wilhelm, Daniel Wagner, Carlos Gaymer, John Parks, Alan Friedlander, Susan White, Charles Sheppard, Mark Spalding, Gustavo San Martin, Andrew Skeat, Sue Taei, Tukabu Teroroko and Jacqueline Evans Craig Groves, Series Editor Large-Scale Marine Protected Areas: Guidelines I The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or other participating organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or other participating organisations. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2017 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Lewis, N., Day, J.C., Wilhelm, ‘A., Wagner, D., Gaymer, C., Parks, J., Friedlander, A., White, S., Sheppard, C., Spalding, M., San Martin, G., Skeat, A., Taei, S., Teroroko, T., Evans, J. (2017). Large-Scale Marine Protected Areas: Guidelines for design and management. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series, No. 26, Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xxviii + 120 pp ISBN: 978-2-8317-1864-4 (PDF) 978-2-8317-1880-4 (print version) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.PAG.26.en Cover photos: Red-footed booby (Sula sula) perch atop stone pillars on Mokumanamana (© Kaleomanuiwa Wong) and the Polynesian double-hulled voyaging canoe sails in the waters off the island of Nihoa (© Na’alehu Anthony) in Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument; and large apex predators dominte in the waters of Motu Motiro Hiva Marine Park (© Carlos Gaymer) Back cover photo: School of Pacific chub, or nenue Kyphosus( sandwicensis), in Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument © Kaleomanuiwa Wong Edited by: Teresa Castle; Colleen Corrigan; Jamie Potenberg, Garcia and Associates; and Linda Bercusson Designed by: Rad Smith from Garcia and Associates, with support from Kahi Fujii and Jonathan Geyer from Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument Printed by: Hagadone, Honolulu, Hawai‘i Available from: IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Global Protected Areas Programme Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland, Switzerland Tel +41 22 999 0000 Fax +41 22 999 0002 [email protected] www.iucn.org/resources/publications The text of this book is printed on paper made from wood fibre from well-managed forests certified in accordance with the rules of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). II Large-Scale Marine Protected Areas: Guidelines Contents Foreword vii Big Ocean Site Map and Table xviii Preface xii Publishing Partners xiv Acknowledgements xvii Abbreviations and acronyms xix Executive summary xxi Using the Guidelines xxiiv 1. Introduction. 1 1 1 Governance sets the foundation 3 1 2 Management at a large scale 4 1 3 The case for ‘Going Big’ 6 1 4 Challenges 9 2. Designing LSMPAs . 15 2 1 Introducing good design 17 2 2 Long-term benefits of a good design 18 2 3 Internal considerations in large-scale design 18 2 4 External considerations in large-scale design 26 2 5 Design planning details: experience from existing LSMPAs 41 3. Management Planning . 49 3 1 Working with multiple jurisdictions 50 3 2 Management planning timeline 50 3 3 Deciding on the best management approach 57 3 4 Public engagement and participation 58 3 5 Sustainable partnerships and financing 60 3 6 Management plan details: vision and mission 60 3 7 Management plan details: goals, strategies, activities and timelines 62 3 8 Scientific esearchr 62 3 9 Access and zoning 64 3 10 Review and approval of the management plan 67 4. Managing LSMPAs. 69 4 1 What does managing an LSMPA involve 70 4 2 Components of management 70 4 3 Reassess the
Recommended publications
  • TP 170 2010 Florida Artificial Reef Summit Abstracts
    Conference Sponsors These organizations are contributing to the research and outreach that supports the wise development of artificial reef programs and sustainable management of Florida’s marine fishery. 2010 FLORIDA Platinum MARI AN NE Artificial IC G R R E O M U A P N o 3 r 3 fo 00 lk, 0- VA (757) 99 Reef Summit Gold Silver Bronze Abstracts & Program January 21-23, 2010 • Cocoa Beach, Florida Conference Organizing Sponsors As chairs of the organizing committee, we welcome you to the 2010 Florida Artificial Reef Summit. With 1,357 miles of coastline, involvement by 34 different counties, and over 2,500 artificial reefs deployed to date, Florida manages one of the most diverse and most active artificial reef programs in the United States. Because artificial reef development in Florida works with, and depends upon, a network of local partners, inter-county coordina- tion and communication is critical to ensure successful implementation of statewide strate- gic objectives for artificial reef development. This Summit occurs every 3 to 5 years and provides the format for local partners to meet and exchange information. It is a critical opportunity for the Florida Fish and Wildlife Con- In Memoriam servation Commission Artificial Reef Program and Florida Sea Grant to disperse high-quality information, experience and program goals and objectives directly with all of Florida’s The 2010 Artificial Reef Summit is dedicated to the memory of Chris Koepfer, the long-time Lee County Arti- artificial reef stakeholders. ficial Reef Coordinator who passed away in 2009. Chris was a well-respected member of Florida’s artificial reef community and played a major role in establishing one of the most successful county artificial reef programs in This will be the eighth Summit.
    [Show full text]
  • RAJA AMPAT MARINE PARK, INDONESIA: the Heart of the Coral Triangle — Conservation Atlas 12/26/18, 10:08 AM
    RAJA AMPAT MARINE PARK, INDONESIA: The Heart of the Coral Triangle — Conservation Atlas 12/26/18, 10:08 AM DECEMBER 12, 2018 RAJA AMPAT MARINE PARK, INDONESIA: The Heart of the Coral Triangle Text: Andreea Lotak; Photographs: Justin & Andreea Lotak • 10 min read The stunning beauty of the Fam Islands as seen from above, Raja Ampat There aren’t many places left on Earth with ecosystems as healthy as those in the Raja Ampat Marine Park. There are over 1,700 species of fish here — with a few dozens of them found nowhere else — swimming among what represents 76% of the world’s coral diversity. The park’s crystal waters protect an area stretching across 35,000 sq km (13,500 sq mi), where large gatherings of manta rays, sharks, whales, mollusks, fish and other aquatic organisms are attracted by the rich nutrients brought by strong oceanic currents. Among all this natural beauty there are roughly 50,000 residents living in villages, settlements and the small town of Waisai, surrounded by limestone cliffs shooting from the turquoise waters and by dense forests where the loud birdsong creates a perfect musical background for a tropical paradise. https://www.conservationatlas.org/blog/raja-ampat-marine-park-indonesia-the-heart-of-the-coral-triangle2018 Page 1 of 15 RAJA AMPAT MARINE PARK, INDONESIA: The Heart of the Coral Triangle — Conservation Atlas 12/26/18, 10:08 AM The Coral Triangle is located at the confluence of the Western Pacific and Indian Oceans, spread across the waters and coastlines of six countries: Indonesia, the Philippines, Papua New Guinea, Malaysia, Solomon Islands and Timor Leste.
    [Show full text]
  • I. I NOV20 2017
    or UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration * i. I NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE Southeast Regional Office 4rES O LQi 3U Ie1U SOU St. Petersburg, Florida 33701-5505 http://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov F/SER3 1: NMB SER-2015- 17616 NOV20 2017 Mr. Donald W. Kinard Chief, Regulatory Division U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 4970 Jacksonville, Florida 32232-0019 Ref.: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jacksonville District’s Programmatic Biological Opinion (JAXBO) Dear Mr. Kinard: Enclosed is the National Marine Fisheries Service’s (NMFS’s) Programmatic Biological Opinion (Opinion) based on our review of the impacts associated with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE’s) Jacksonville District’s authorization of 10 categories of minor in-water activities within Florida and the U.S. Caribbean (Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands). The Opinion analyzes the effects from 10 categories of minor in-water activities occurring in Florida and the U.S. Caribbean on sea turtles (loggerhead, leatherback, Kemp’s ridley, hawksbill, and green); smalitooth sawfish; Nassau grouper; scalloped hammerhead shark, Johnson’s seagrass; sturgeon (Gulf, shortnose, and Atlantic); corals (elkhom, staghorn, boulder star, mountainous star, lobed star, rough cactus, and pillar); whales (North Atlantic right whale, sei, blue, fin, and sperm); and designated critical habitat for Johnson’s seagrass; smalltooth sawfish; sturgeon (Gulf and Atlantic); sea turtles (green, hawksbill, leatherback, loggerhead); North Atlantic right whale; and elkhorn and staghorn corals in accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. We also analyzed effects on the proposed Bryde’s whale.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Transformative Forces of Aquaculture in the Marine Aquarium Trade
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Summer 8-22-2020 Senders, Receivers, and Spillover Dynamics: Understanding Transformative Forces of Aquaculture in the Marine Aquarium Trade Bryce Risley University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Risley, Bryce, "Senders, Receivers, and Spillover Dynamics: Understanding Transformative Forces of Aquaculture in the Marine Aquarium Trade" (2020). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3314. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/3314 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SENDERS, RECEIVERS, AND SPILLOVER DYNAMICS: UNDERSTANDING TRANSFORMATIVE FORCES OF AQUACULTURE IN THE MARINE AQUARIUM TRADE By Bryce Risley B.S. University of New Mexico, 2014 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (in Marine Policy and Marine Biology) The Graduate School The University of Maine May 2020 Advisory Committee: Joshua Stoll, Assistant Professor of Marine Policy, Co-advisor Nishad Jayasundara, Assistant Professor of Marine Biology, Co-advisor Aaron Strong, Assistant Professor of Environmental Studies (Hamilton College) Christine Beitl, Associate Professor of Anthropology Douglas Rasher, Senior Research Scientist of Marine Ecology (Bigelow Laboratory) Heather Hamlin, Associate Professor of Marine Biology No photograph in this thesis may be used in another work without written permission from the photographer.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Survivorship of Scleractinian Coral Transplants And
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Oceanography Faculty Proceedings, Presentations, Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences Speeches, Lectures 2006 Growth and Survivorship of Scleractinian Coral Transplants and the Effectiveness of Plugging Core Holes in Transplant Donor Colonies Elizabeth Glynn Fahy Nova Southeastern University Richard E. Dodge Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] Daniel P. Fahy Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] T. Patrick Quinn Nova Southeastern University David S. Gilliam Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons NSUWorks Citation Fahy, Elizabeth Glynn; Dodge, Richard E.; Fahy, Daniel P.; Quinn, T. Patrick; Gilliam, David S.; and Spieler, Richard E., "Growth and Survivorship of Scleractinian Coral Transplants and the Effectiveness of Plugging Core Holes in Transplant Donor Colonies" (2006). Oceanography Faculty Proceedings, Presentations, Speeches, Lectures. Paper 44. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations/44 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Oceanography Faculty Proceedings, Presentations, Speeches, Lectures by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Elizabeth Glynn Fahy, Richard E. Dodge, Daniel P. Fahy, T. Patrick Quinn, David S. Gilliam, and Richard E. Spieler This conference proceeding is available at NSUWorks: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations/44 Growth and survivorship of scleractinian coral transplants and the effectiveness of plugging core holes in transplant donor colonies Elizabeth Glynn FAHY*, Richard E.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Areas Programme PARKS Vol 9 No 1 • February 1999 Reserve Design and Selection Protected Areas Programme
    Protected Areas Programme PARKS Vol 9 No 1 • February 1999 Reserve Design and Selection Protected Areas Programme PARKSThe international journal for protected area managers Vol 9 No 1 • February 1999 ISSN: 0960-233X Published three times a year by the World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) of IUCN – The World Conservation Union. Editor: Paul Goriup PARKS, 36 Kingfisher Court, Hambridge Assistant Editor: Becky Miles Road, Newbury, RG14 5SJ, UK Translations: Belen Blanco (Spanish), Fax: [+ 44] (0)1635 550230 Balfour Business Communications Ltd Email: [email protected] (French) PARKS Advisory Board Subscription rates and advertisements David Sheppard Chairman Please see inside back cover for details of subscription (Head, IUCN Protected Areas Programme) and advertising rates. If you require any further Paul Goriup information, please contact the editorial office at the (Managing Director, Nature Conservation Bureau Ltd) address above. Jeremy Harrison (WCMC) Lota Melamari Contributing to PARKS (Director General, Tanzania National Parks) PARKS welcomes contributions for future issues. Gustavo Suárez de Freitas Potential authors should contact PARKS at the (Executive Director, ProNaturaleza, Peru) address above for details regarding manuscript Adrian Phillips (Chair, WCPA) preparation and deadlines before submitting material. PARKS is published to strengthen international collaboration among protected area professionals and to enhance their role, status and activities by: ❚ maintaining and improving an effective network of protected area managers throughout the world, building on the established network of WCPA ❚ serving as a leading global forum for the exchange of information on issues relating to protected area establishment and management ❚ ensuring that protected areas are placed at the forefront of contemporary environmental issues such as biodiversity conservation and ecologically sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Central American Cichlids Thea Quick Beautiful Guide to the Major Klunzinger’S Groups! Wrasse
    Redfish Issue #6, December 2011 Central American cichlids theA quick beautiful guide to the major Klunzinger’s groups! Wrasse Tropical Marine Reef Grow the Red Tiger Lotus! Family Serranidae explored. Vanuatu’s amazing reef! 100 80 60 40 Light insensityLight (%) 20 0 0:00 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 0:00 Time PAR Readings Surface 855 20cm 405 40cm 185 60cm 110 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Model Number Dimensions Power Radiance 60 68x22x5.5cm 90W Radiance 90 100x22x5.5cm 130W Radiance 120 130x22x5.5cm 180W 11000K (white only) Total Output 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 Distribution Relative Spectral Relative 0.0 0.0 400 500 600 700 400 500 600 700 Wavelength Marine Coral Reef Aqua One Radiance.indd 1 9/12/11 12:36 PM Redfish contents redfishmagazine.com.au 4 About 5 News Redfish is: 7 Off the shelf Jessica Drake, Nicole Sawyer, Julian Corlet & David Midgley 13 Where land and water meet: Ripariums Email: [email protected] Web: redfishmagazine.com.au 15 Competitions Facebook: facebook.com/redfishmagazine Twitter: @redfishmagazine 16 Red Lotus Redfish Publishing. Pty Ltd. PO Box 109 Berowra Heights, 17 Today in the Fishroom NSW, Australia, 2082. ACN: 151 463 759 23 Klunzinger’s Wrasse This month’s Eye Candy Contents Page Photos courtesy: (Top row. Left to Right) 28 Not just Groupers: Serranidae ‘Gurnard on the Wing - Coió’ by Lazlo Ilyes ‘shachihoko’ by Emre Ayaroglu ‘Starfish, Waterlemon Cay, St. John, USVI’ by Brad Spry 33 Snorkel Vanuatu ‘Water Ballet’ by Martina Rathgens ‘Strange Creatures’ by Steve Jurvetson 42 Illumination: Guide to lighting (Part II) (Bottom row.
    [Show full text]
  • Solutions in Ecosystem Restorations
    Acknowledgments ne of the more common questions in restoration We thank Adam Puderbaugh, Cassie Herringshaw, Dan Anderson, Oscience is how grassroots organizations can conduct and Rebecca Burch for assistance with sample collection and pro- and participate in meaningful and ecologically sound res- cessing, and Jimmie Thompson, Dean Biechler, Scott Brunsheen, toration projects. The Reef Ball Foundation (RBF) is a Don Farrar, Kevin Shawgo, John Pearson, and Steve Lekwa for nonprofit organization dedicated to protection and resto- identification of and permission to use sample sites. Support for ration of reef ecosystems. Scientists and other RBF experts this project was provided by the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture, the Pioneer Foundation, and McIntire-Stennis funds. have been collaborating for over a decade to develop tools that can be easily implemented in the field by grassroots groups, to facilitate successful localized restoration, reha- References bilitation, and reintroduction projects. However, restora- Anderson, W.B. and W.G. Eickmeier. 2000. Nutrient resorption tion efforts such as these, while often showing reasonable in Claytonia virginica L.: Implications for deciduous forest localized success rates, have received a fair amount of criti- nutrient cycling. Canadian Journal of Botany 78:832–839. cism about their ineffectiveness in the face of large-scale Blank, J.L., R.K. Olson and P.M. Vitousek. 1980. Nutrient uptake by a diverse spring ephemeral community. Oecologia threats to coral reefs, such as climate change and ocean 47:96–98. acidification (e.g., Pandolfi et al. 2003, De’ath et al. 2009). Eickmeier, W.G. and E.E. Schussler. 1993. Responses of In light of these larger threats, small-scale coral restoration the spring ephemeral Claytonia virginica L.
    [Show full text]
  • Equilibrium Theory of Island Biogeography: a Review
    Equilibrium Theory of Island Biogeography: A Review Angela D. Yu Simon A. Lei Abstract—The topography, climatic pattern, location, and origin of relationship, dispersal mechanisms and their response to islands generate unique patterns of species distribution. The equi- isolation, and species turnover. Additionally, conservation librium theory of island biogeography creates a general framework of oceanic and continental (habitat) islands is examined in in which the study of taxon distribution and broad island trends relation to minimum viable populations and areas, may be conducted. Critical components of the equilibrium theory metapopulation dynamics, and continental reserve design. include the species-area relationship, island-mainland relation- Finally, adverse anthropogenic impacts on island ecosys- ship, dispersal mechanisms, and species turnover. Because of the tems are investigated, including overexploitation of re- theoretical similarities between islands and fragmented mainland sources, habitat destruction, and introduction of exotic spe- landscapes, reserve conservation efforts have attempted to apply cies and diseases (biological invasions). Throughout this the theory of island biogeography to improve continental reserve article, theories of many researchers are re-introduced and designs, and to provide insight into metapopulation dynamics and utilized in an analytical manner. The objective of this article the SLOSS debate. However, due to extensive negative anthropo- is to review previously published data, and to reveal if any genic activities, overexploitation of resources, habitat destruction, classical and emergent theories may be brought into the as well as introduction of exotic species and associated foreign study of island biogeography and its relevance to mainland diseases (biological invasions), island conservation has recently ecosystem patterns. become a pressing issue itself.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOT Field Report
    ©2015 Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation. All Rights Reserved. Science Without Borders®. All research was completed under: British Indian Ocean Territory, The immigration Ordinance 2006, Permit for Visit. Dated 10th April, 2015, issued by Tom Moody, Administrator. This report was developed as one component of the Global Reef Expedition: BIOT research project. Citation: Global Reef Expedition: British Indian Ocean Territory. Field Report 19. Bruckner, A.W. (2015). Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation, Annapolis, MD. pp 36. The Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation (KSLOF) was incorporated in California as a 501(c)(3), public benefit, Private Operating Foundation in September 2000. The Living Oceans Foundation is dedicated to providing science-based solutions to protect and restore ocean health. For more information, visit http://www.lof.org and https://www.facebook.com/livingoceansfoundation Twitter: https://twitter.com/LivingOceansFdn Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation 130 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD, 21403, USA [email protected] Executive Director Philip G. Renaud Chief Scientist Andrew W. Bruckner, Ph.D. Images by Andrew Bruckner, unless noted. Maps completed by Alex Dempsey, Jeremy Kerr and Steve Saul Fish observations compiled by Georgia Coward and Badi Samaniego Front cover: Eagle Island. Photo by Ken Marks. Back cover: A shallow reef off Salomon Atoll. The reef is carpeted in leather corals and a bleached anemone, Heteractis magnifica, is visible in the fore ground. A school of giant trevally, Caranx ignobilis, pass over the reef. Photo by Phil Renaud. Executive Summary Between 7 March 2015 and 3 May 2015, the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation conducted two coral reef research missions as components of our Global Reef Expedition (GRE) program.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Areas and Biodiversity Conservation I: Reserve Planning and Design
    Network of Conservation Educators & Practitioners Protected Areas and Biodiversity Conservation I: Reserve Planning and Design Author(s): Eugenia Naro-Maciel, Eleanor J. Stering, and Madhu Rao Source: Lessons in Conservation, Vol. 2, pp. 19-49 Published by: Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History Stable URL: ncep.amnh.org/linc/ This article is featured in Lessons in Conservation, the official journal of the Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners (NCEP). NCEP is a collaborative project of the American Museum of Natural History’s Center for Biodiversity and Conservation (CBC) and a number of institutions and individuals around the world. Lessons in Conservation is designed to introduce NCEP teaching and learning resources (or “modules”) to a broad audience. NCEP modules are designed for undergraduate and professional level education. These modules—and many more on a variety of conservation topics—are available for free download at our website, ncep.amnh.org. To learn more about NCEP, visit our website: ncep.amnh.org. All reproduction or distribution must provide full citation of the original work and provide a copyright notice as follows: “Copyright 2008, by the authors of the material and the Center for Biodiversity and Conservation of the American Museum of Natural History. All rights reserved.” Illustrations obtained from the American Museum of Natural History’s library: images.library.amnh.org/digital/ SYNTHESIS 19 Protected Areas and Biodiversity Conservation I: Reserve Planning and Design Eugenia Naro-Maciel,* Eleanor J. Stering, † and Madhu Rao ‡ * The American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, U.S.A., email [email protected] † The American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, U.S.A., email [email protected] ‡ Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, NY, U.S.A., email [email protected] Source: K.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Flame Angelfish (Centropyge Loriculus) As a Model Species in Studies on Egg and Larval Quality in Marine Fishes Chatham K
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 8-2007 Assessment of the Flame Angelfish (Centropyge loriculus) as a Model Species in Studies on Egg and Larval Quality in Marine Fishes Chatham K. Callan Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Oceanography Commons Recommended Citation Callan, Chatham K., "Assessment of the Flame Angelfish (Centropyge loriculus) as a Model Species in Studies on Egg and Larval Quality in Marine Fishes" (2007). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 126. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/126 This Open-Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. ASSESSMENT OF THE FLAME ANGELFISH (Centropyge loriculus) AS A MODEL SPECIES IN STUDIES ON EGG AND LARVAL QUALITY IN MARINE FISHES By Chatham K. Callan B.S. Fairleigh Dickinson University, 1997 M.S. University of Maine, 2000 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in Marine Biology) The Graduate School The University of Maine August, 2007 Advisory Committee: David W. Townsend, Professor of Oceanography, Advisor Linda Kling, Associate Professor of Aquaculture and Fish Nutrition, Co-Advisor Denise Skonberg, Associate Professor of Food Science Mary Tyler, Professor of Biological Science Christopher Brown, Professor of Marine Science (Florida International University) LIBRARY RIGHTS STATEMENT In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Maine, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for inspection.
    [Show full text]