Implementation Masterplan Version 1

IMPLEMENTATION MASTERPLAN VERSION 1

Reliability Compliancy Structural Document for Phase 1 / Situational Assessment

NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Siyathemba LM WSA March 2018

Produced for: Water Services: Planning & Information

Note: Developed from DWS Geodatabase for roll out to WSA's to complete data gaps Implementation Masterplan Version 1 Reliability Compliancy Structural Document Phase 1 / Situational Assessment Acknowledgements

Directorate: Water Services Macro Planning Mr S Marais (National Coordinator)

Purpose of this document is to pave a process to enable achievement toward a 90% reliable supply of water and sanitation services. The process is divided in 4 phases:

PHASE 1 To provide a comprehensive base line assessment of water services delivery at WSA level. Problems were identified, possible solutions determined and monitoring procedures and structures implemented.

PHASE 2 Establish of 5 Reliability Category Working groups in each DM related to:

1. Functionality Solutions 2. Water Security 3. New Infrastructure Solutions 4. Funding Models 5. Governance

PHASE 3 Project Implementation

PHASE 4 Monitoring and updating of reliability status

The aim of the process is to produce a document per WSA, to integrate all problems, streamline solutions and monitor progress on water services delivery. Also to create one informed system that all sectors can use as a planning and reporting structure

WATER SUPPLY PROGRAMMES ■ 2019 MTSF Reporting ■ Outcome 9 Reporting ■ Back to Basics Programme ■ MIG ■ WSIG ■ RBIG ■ COGTA ■ Presidential M&E Unit Implementation Masterplan Version 1 Reliability Compliancy Structural Document Phase 1 / Situational Assessment Index

PROCESS TOPIC PAGE NR TOPIC PAGE NR FLOW Information Pages 3 4 EXISTING NEEDS / PROJECTS MATRIX SUMMARY STEP 1 GENERAL ORIENTATION 1 4.1 Water Summary 28 1.1 Demographics 01, 02 4.2 Sanitation Summary 29 1.2 Population Distribution 03 4 5 RELIABILITY INDEX CALCULATION 1.3 Groundwater 04 1.4 Surface Water 05 5.1 Water & Sanitation Calculation 30 2 SITUTATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW 5.2 MuSSA Graph 31 5.3 Water & Sanitation Graphs 32 2.1 FUNCTIONALITY 5 6 BACKLOG ERADICATION SOLUTION (EXISTING PROJECTS STATUS SUMMARY) 2.1.1 Operation & Maintenance 2.1.1.1 Water O&M (Local & Scheme Based) 06 6.1 Physical Infrastructure Solution 33

2.1.1.2 Sanitation O&M (Local & Scheme Based) 07 INFO 7 PROJECT DETAIL 34 - 2.1.2 Refurbishment PAGES 2.1.2.1 Water Refurbished & Recover (Local & Scheme Based Solution) 08 2.1.2.2 Sanitation Refurbished & Recover (Local Solution - Dry Sanitation) 09 2.1.2.3 Sanitation Refurbished & Recover (Scheme Based - Wet Sanitation) 10 2.1.3 Replace Old 2.1.3.1 Water Scheme Based Life Span Reached 11 2.1.3.2 Water Component Based Incident Matrix 12 2.1.3.3 Sanitation Scheme Based Life Span Reached 13 2.1.3.4 Sanitation Component Based Incident Matrix 14 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS WITH REGARDS TO: 2.1 WATER SECURITY 1. Water Services Planning 2.2.1 Blue Drop Status 2. Mangement Skill Level (Technical) 2.2.1.1 Service Quality - Blue Drop 15 3. Staff Skill Levels (Technical) 2.2.2 Green Drop Status 4. Technical Staff Capacity (Numbers) 2.2.2.1 Water Services - Green Drop 16 5. Water Resource Management (WRM) 2.2.3 Source Requirements 6. Water Conservation & Water Demang Management (WC/WDM) 2.2.3.1 Resource Needs (Local & Scheme Based Solution) 17 7. Drinking Water Safety & Regulatory Compliance 2.2.3.2 Conservation & Demand Management Table 18 8. Basic Sanitation 2.3 NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 9. Wastewater/Environmental Safety & Regulatory Compliance 2.3.1 Unserved (None) 10. Infrastructure Asset Management (IAM) 2.3.1.1 Water Unserved (Local & Scheme Based Solution) 19 11. Operation & Maintenance of Assets 2.3.1.2 Sanitation Unserved (Dry & Wet Sanitation) 20 12. Financial Management 2.3.2 Under Served 13. Revenue Collection 2.3.2.1 Water Under Served 21 14. Financial Asset Management 2.3.2.2 Sanitation Under Served - Dry Sanitation 22 15. Information Management (IT) 16. Organisational Performance Monitoring 2.3.2.3 Sanitation Under Served - Wet Sanitation 23 17. Water and Sanitation Service Quality 3 GOVERNANCE 2 18. Custormer Care (CRM)

3.1 Improved Water Governance (Institutional) 24, 25 3.2 Financial 3.2.1 Water Services Financial Diagram 26 3.2.2 Cost to Ensure Existing Reliable Services 27 Implementation Masterplan Version 1 Reliability Compliancy Structural Document Phase 1 / Situational Assessment Information Page (1) Water Supply Goal (obligation) We have to ensure that all people (universal) in South Africa have access to reliable, sustainable, safe and affordable water services Cabinet (July 2014): Focus on: – Ensure 90% reliable services by 2019 • Ensure: make sure we succeed • SDG & NDP : • Universal, reliable, sustainable, – 100% access to sustainable services by 2030 safe, and affordable • Original target = 100% coverage by 2008/2014 (not achieved) • Service

Backlog Eradication Measures: Defining the water Supply Service Target and Challenge ‘90% reliable services by 2019’

WATER SANITATION

100% 100% Total Target 90% Total Target 90% 90% 90% Reliability Reliability 80% 80% Status Status 70% 70% Benchmark Benchmark 60% 60% 50% 50% 40% 40% 30% 30%

20% 20%

10% 10%

2011 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2011 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Censu DWS Censu DWS s s Implementation Masterplan Version 1 Reliability Compliancy Structural Document Phase 1 / Situational Assessment Information Page (2) Understanding the Target and Outcome

• Focus is on sustainable and reliable services • Reliable Not= access to infrastructure or operational service (working but not necessarily providing a good service e.g. might experience interruptions) • Services means the Total Water Services Business and not only Infrastructure related solutions

Water Services Business Elements that constitutes the Total Water Services Development Planning Framework Backlog Eradication & Reliability Index Process Flow

Solution Definition Categories Backlog Consensus / Interpretation Backlog Eradication Solutions (Projects ) 1 Un-served (100% coverage)

2 Underserved

3 Refurbish, recover, replace Technical Solutions 4 Aged infrastructure

5 Operations and maintenance Reliability Index Calculation

6 New infrastructure Effecting Contributing impact % Factor Factors related to 7 Water Security/protection Households Strategic / 8 Service quality Institutional Interpretation Solutions 9 improved water governance

10 Environmental management % Reliability

11 Sustainable services & management 1. GENERAL ORIENTATION

1.1 Demographics

1 GENERAL OVERVIEW SETTLEMENT TYPES (2016) WSA = Siyathemba LM Settlement Type Settlements Households Population Urban Centres: Metropolitan Area 0 0 0 Prieska Urban - Formal Town 3 4 825 20 507 Marydale Urban - Former Township 0 0 0 Niekerkshoop Rural - Dense Villages > 5000 0 0 0 Copperton Rural - Small Villages <= 5000 1 35 60 Rural Scattered 0 0 0 Rural Scattered Dense 0 0 0 2 WSA POPULATION DISTRIBUTION Rural Scattered Low Density 0 0 0 Total Population 2016: 21 244 Rural Scattered Very Low Density 0 0 0 Total Number of Households 2016: 5 038 Farming (People living on farms) 0 0 0 Average Household Size: 4.22 Urban - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) 1 178 677 Total Area: ha 1 486 984 Rural - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) 0 0 0 Population Density: people per ha 0.01 Working Towns and Service Centres - Mines, Prisons etc. 0 0 0 Unknown 0 0 0 TOTAL 5 5 038 21 244 3 STATS SA POPULATION COMPOSITION Population Group Distribution Metropolitan Area Settlements Population Group % of Total Population 100.00 Urban - Formal Town Black/African 18.73 Urban - Former Township 20% 80.00 Coloured 71.93 Rural - Dense Villages > 5000 60% Indian/Asian 0.54 60.00 Rural - Small Villages <= 5000 White 8.46 Rural Scattered 40.00 20% Other 0.33 Rural Scattered Dense 20.00 Rural Scattered Low Density Rural Scattered Very Low Density 0.00 Farming (People living on farms) Urban - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) Rural - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp)

Black/African Coloured Indian/Asian White Other Working Towns and Service Centres - Mines, Prisons etc. Unknown

4 SETTLEMENT TYPE DISTRIBUTION Metropolitan Area Population MAIN TYPES: URBAN / RURAL (2016) Urban - Formal Town 3% WSA Main Type Settlements Households Population Urban - Former Township Rural - Dense Villages > 5000 Siyathemba LM Rural 1 35 60 97% Siyathemba LM Urban 4 5 003 21 184 Rural - Small Villages <= 5000 Rural Scattered Settlements Population Rural Scattered Dense Rural Urban Rural Urban Rural Scattered Low Density 0% 20% 100 Rural Scattered Very Low Density 80% % Farming (People living on farms) Urban - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) Rural - Informal Settlements (Squatter Camp) Working Towns and Service Centres - Mines, Prisons etc. 01 Unknown 1. GENERAL ORIENTATION

1.1 Demographics

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu Settlement Types !Kheis Local Municipality Metropolitan Area Formal Town Former Township NIEKERKSHOOP

Working Towns & Service Centres

MARYDALE INFORMAL A (Mines, Prisons etc.) MARYDALE

Northern Cape Informal Settlements Squatter Camp (Urban & Rural) Pixley ka Seme Rural - Dense Village (Population > 5000) Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Local Municipality Rural - Small Village (Population <= 5000)

PRIESKA Rural Scattered - Dense - Low Density - Very Low Density

Farming

COPPERTON

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality Kareeberg Local Municipality 02 1. GENERAL ORIENTATION

1.2 Population Distribution

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu Population Distribution !Kheis 0 - 500 people Local Municipality NIEKERKSHOOP ORANGE RIVER TO MARYDALE 501 - 1 000 people NIEKERKSHOOP

ORANGE RIVER TO NIEKERKSHOOP 1 001 - 5 000 people

MARYDALE INFORMAL A MARYDALE 5 001 - 10 000 people MARYDALE Northern Cape 10 001 - 20 000 people Pixley ka Seme > 20 000 people

Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Local Municipality Number of Schemes: Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA PRIESKA 7 PRIESKA Nr of Settlements Nr of HH in Schemes in Schemes

5 5 038

Outside Schemes (Local)

Nr of Settlements Nr of HH outside Schemes outside Schemes

0 0 COPPERTON COPPERTON

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA PIXLEY KA SEME FARMS Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Water Scheme Areas Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality 03 Kareeberg Local Municipality 1. GENERAL ORIENTATION

1.4 Groundwater

GROBLERSHOOP LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Siyancuma Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard

Pixley ka Seme Namakwa

Settlements Groundwater Scheme Water Use Deficit Situation Groundwater No Data Z F Mgcawu !Kheis Surface water Current ((((( Combination 5 Years NIEKERKSHOOP(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( ( Unknown 10 Years ORANGE RIVER TO NIEKERKSHOOP 15 Years ORANGE RIVER TO MARYDALE Boreholes ( Observation 20 Years (((((((((((((( MARYDALE(((( ( No Data Sufficient to at least 2030 ! Prime Condition Surface Water and Combination Water Schemes ! Operational ! Dysfunctional ! Vandalised

Nr of Community Supply Boreholes : 161 Observation Nr of Boreholes Incidents Nr of Boreholes No Data 161 No Data 161 Dysfunctional 0 None 0 Operational 0 Periodic 0 Pixley ka Seme Siyathemba Prime Condition 0 Regular 0 Vandalised 0 Sporadic 0 PRIESKA ((((((((((( O&M Occurrence Refurbishment Need No Data 161 No Data 161 ( Thembelihle None 0 High 0 Periodic 0 Medium 0 ((( Regular 0 Low 0 Sporadic 0 None 0

Safety Inspection Expected Lifespan No Data 161 No Data 161 None 0 Short 0 Periodic 0 Medium 0 Regular 0 Long 0 ( Sporadic 0

Borehole Yield Classification 0,1 - 0,5 l/s 12 0,5 - 3,0 l/s 21 3,0 - 5,0 l/s 6 ((((((((((((((((((((((( >5,0 l/s 2 Dry 0 No Data 120

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality Provincial Boundaries ((((((((((( District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Refurbishment PIXLEY KA SEME FARMS Scheme Name Resource Type Class O&M Need Requirement Water Resource Name Deficit Situation Priority Reconcilliation Solution Need Emthanjeni ((((( Settlements MARYDALE Groundwater Internal Bulk High Medium None Groundwater Current Source Investigation and Protection Kareeberg Roads NIEKERKSHOOP Groundwater Internal Bulk High Medium Upgrade Groundwater Sufficient to at least 2030 WCDM ORANGE RIVER TO MARYDALE Groundwater Regional Bulk None None None Groundwater Current Source Investigation and Protection ORANGE RIVER TO NIEKERKSHOOP Groundwater Regional Bulk None None None Groundwater Sufficient to at least 2030 WCDM PIXLEY KA SEME FARMS Groundwater Internal Bulk None None None Groundwater No Data No Data 04 1. GENERAL ORIENTATION

1.5 Surface Water

Refurbishment LOCALITY MAP Scheme Name Resource Type Class O&M Need Requirement Water Resource Name Deficit Situation Priority Reconcilliation Solution e Need g GRIEKWASTAD n a r O COPPERTON Combined Internal Bulk Low Low None Combination No Data No Data John Taolo Gaetsewe GROBLERSHOOP PRIESKA Surface Water Internal Bulk High Low None Orange River Current WCDM

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Siyancuma

Pixley ka Seme Namakwa Boegoeberg Dam )"

Dams - Utilisation Grade

)" 2-under-utilized )" 3-moderate use )" 4-approaching design capacity )" 5-exceeding capacity (stressed) NIEKERKSHOOP.! )" No Data Z F Mgcawu !Kheis Settlements Water Supply Situation .! MARYDALE.! .! No Data .! Current .! 5 Years .! 10 Years .! 15 Years .! 20 Years .! Sufficient to at least 2030 Surface Water Schemes Siyathemba Pixley ka Seme PRIESKA Deficit Situation je PRIESKA.! Oran No Data Thembelihle Current 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years Sufficient to at least 2030

Groundwater Schemes Perennial Rivers COPPERTON.! Non-Perennial Rivers

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality Provinical Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Emthanjeni Settlements Kareeberg Roads

05 VANWYKSVLEI Vanwyksvlei )"

SECTION BREAK 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.1.1 Water Operation & Maintenance 2.1 FUNCTIONALITY 2.1.1.1 Local & Scheme Based Solutions

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu SIYATHEMBA LM WSA !Kheis Total Households: 5 038 Local Municipality Total Population: 21 244 NIEKERKSHOOP ORANGE RIVER TO MARYDALE Water Local Solutions NIEKERKSHOOP Operation & Maintenance ORANGE RIVER TO NIEKERKSHOOP Settlements with O&M needs MARYDALE INFORMAL A MARYDALE MARYDALE Northern Cape WATER

Pixley ka Seme Operation & Maintenance Settlements with O&M needs Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Households Local Municipality 0 Affected Settlements

PRIESKA 0 PRIESKA

WATER SCHEME O&M NEEDS

O&M NEED HH POP

High 0 0

Medium 1 385 5 264

Low 3 653 15 980 COPPERTON COPPERTON None 0 0

Unknown 0 0

BASE MAP LEGEND PIXLEY KA SEME FARMS Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality 06 * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.1.1 Sanitation Operation & Maintenance 2.1 FUNCTIONALITY 2.1.1.2 Local & Scheme Based Solutions

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu SIYATHEMBA LM WSA !Kheis Total Households: 5 038 Local Municipality Total Population: 21 244

Sanitation Local Solutions NIEKERKSHOOP Operation & Maintenance Settlements with O&M needs MARYDALE INFORMAL A MARYDALE

Northern Cape SANITATION

Pixley ka Seme Operation & Maintenance Settlements with O&M needs Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Households Local Municipality 0 Affected Settlements

PRIESKA 0

SANITATION SCHEME O&M NEEDS

O&M NEED HH POP

High 0 0

Medium 0 0

Low 0 0 COPPERTON None 0 0

Unknown 0 0

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality 07 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.1.2 Water Refurbished & Recover 2.1 FUNCTIONALITY 2.1.2.1 Local & Scheme Based Solution

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu SIYATHEMBA LM WSA !Kheis Total Households: 5 038 Local Municipality Total Population: 21 244 NIEKERKSHOOP ORANGE RIVER TO MARYDALE WATER NIEKERKSHOOP REFURBISH & RECOVER

ORANGE RIVER TO NIEKERKSHOOP Local Solution

MARYDALE INFORMAL A MARYDALE Settlement part of an existing MARYDALE local solution with refurbishment Northern Cape needs (Refurbish & Recover) Pixley ka Seme WATER Refurbish & Recover

Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle part of an existing local solution Local with refurbishment needs Municipality Households Population

0 0 PRIESKA PRIESKA Affected Settlements 0

WATER SCHEME AREAS REFURBISHMENT NEEDS

REF NEED HH POP

High 5 003 21 184

COPPERTON Medium 0 0 COPPERTON Low 35 60

None 0 0

BASE MAP LEGEND PIXLEY KA SEME FARMS Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality 08 * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality

Blank Page (For map sequence) 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.1.2 Sanitation Refurbished & Recover 2.1 FUNCTIONALITY 2.1.2.2 Local Solution - Dry Sanitation

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu SIYATHEMBA LM WSA !Kheis Total Households: 5 038 Local Municipality Total Population: 21 244 SANITATION NIEKERKSHOOP REFURBISH & RECOVER Local Solution - Dry Sanitation

MARYDALE INFORMAL A MARYDALE Settlement part of an existing sanitation local solution with Northern Cape refurbishment needs (Refurbish & Recover) Pixley ka Seme SANITATION Refurbish & Recover Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle part of an existing sanitation Local local solutionwith refurbishment Municipality needs Households Population

PRIESKA 0 0

Affected Settlements

COPPERTON

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality 09 * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.1.2 Sanitation Refurbished & Recover 2.1 FUNCTIONALITY 2.1.2.3 Scheme Based Solution - Wet Sanitation

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu Local Solution - Wet Sanitation !Kheis Settlement part of an existing Local Municipality sanitation local solution with refurbishment needs (Refurbish & Recover) NIEKERKSHOOP SANITATION Refurbish & Recover MARYDALE INFORMAL A part of an existing sanitation MARYDALE local solution with refurbishment Northern Cape needs Pixley ka Seme Households Population 0 0 Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Affected Settlements Local 0 Municipality

SANITATION SCHEME AREAS PRIESKA REFURBISHMENT NEEDS

REF NEED HH POP

High 0 0

Medium 0 0

Low 0 0

None 0 0

COPPERTON Unknown 0 0

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality 10 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.1.3 Replace Old 2.1 FUNCTIONALITY 2.1.3.1 Water Scheme Based Life Span Reached

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu WATER SCHEME AREAS: !Kheis LIFE SPAN REACHED Local Municipality LIFE SPAN REACHED HH POP NIEKERKSHOOP ORANGE RIVER TO MARYDALE NIEKERKSHOOP Yes 0 0 ORANGE RIVER TO NIEKERKSHOOP No 0 0 MARYDALE INFORMAL A MARYDALE MARYDALE Northern Cape Unknown 5 038 21 244

Pixley ka Seme WATER REPLACE OLD INFRASTRUCTURE Local Solution Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Local Settlement part of an existing Municipality local solution with infrastructure replacement needs WATER PRIESKA Replace Infrastructure PRIESKA part of an existing local solution where infrastructure needs to be replaced Households Population

0 0

Affected Settlements

0 COPPERTON COPPERTON

BASE MAP LEGEND PIXLEY KA SEME FARMS Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality 11 * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.1 FUNCTIONALITY 2.1.3 Replace Old 2.1.3.2 Water Component Based Incident Matrix

Scheme Area Life Span Reached * Scheme Area Title Block colour refer to Life Span Reached Status 12 NO YES UNKNOWN

COPPERTON MARYDALE

Total Expected Lifespan Total Cost Total Expected Lifespan Total Cost Incidents Incidents Lifespan Reached Requirements (RM) Lifespan Reached Requirements (RM)

Infrastructure Infrastructure Component Component No of Components No of Components Regular Sporadic Periodic None Short Term (1 - 3yr) Medium Term 3 - 10yr) Long Term 10 - 20yr) Yes No Unknown Total Refurbishment Cost Total Replacement Cost Regular Sporadic Periodic None Short Term (1 - 3yr) Medium Term 3 - 10yr) Long Term 10 - 20yr) Yes No Unknown Total Refurbishment Cost Total Replacement Cost Bulk Pipelines Bulk Pipelines Reservoirs Reservoirs Pumpstations Pumpstations Water Treatment Works Water Treatment Works

NIEKERKSHOOP ORANGE RIVER TO MARYDALE

Total Expected Lifespan Total Cost Total Expected Lifespan Total Cost Incidents Incidents Lifespan Reached Requirements (RM) Lifespan Reached Requirements (RM)

VANDERKLOOF+R21:AE28 ORANGE RIVER TO NIEKERKSHOOP PIXLEY KA SEME FARMS

Total Expected Lifespan Total Cost Total Expected Lifespan Total Cost Incidents Incidents Lifespan Reached Requirements (RM) Lifespan Reached Requirements (RM)

2.1 FUNCTIONALITY 2.1.3 Replace Old 2.1.3.2 Water Component Based Incident Matrix

Scheme Area Life Span Reached * Scheme Area Title Block colour refer to Life Span Reached Status 12 NO YES UNKNOWN

PRIESKA

Total Expected Lifespan Total Cost Incidents Lifespan Reached Requirements (RM)

Infrastructure Component No of Components Regular Sporadic Periodic None Short Term (1 - 3yr) Medium Term 3 - 10yr) Long Term 10 - 20yr) Yes No Unknown Total Refurbishment Cost Total Replacement Cost Bulk Pipelines Reservoirs Pumpstations Water Treatment Works

Blank Page (For map sequence) 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.1.3 Replace Old 2.1 FUNCTIONALITY 2.1.3.2 Sanitation Scheme Based Life Span Reached

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu SANITATION SCHEME AREAS: !Kheis LIFE SPAN REACHED Local Municipality LIFE SPAN REACHED HH POP

NIEKERKSHOOP Yes 0 0

No 0 0 MARYDALE INFORMAL A MARYDALE Northern Cape Unknown 0 0 Pixley ka Seme

Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Local Municipality

PRIESKA

COPPERTON

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality 13 * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.1 FUNCTIONALITY 2.1.3 Replace Old 2.1.3.4 Sanitation Component Based Incident Matrix

Sanitation Scheme Area Life Span Reached * Scheme Area Title Block colour refer to Life Span Reached Status

NO YES UNKNOWN

Scheme Area Scheme Number Total Nr Incidents Total Expected Lifespan Reached Total Cost Requirements WWTW Lifespan (RM) No Yes Cost Cost Total Total None (1 - 3yr) Regular Periodic (3 - 10yr) Sporadic Unknown (10 - 20yr) Long Term Short Term Replacement Medium Term Refurbishment

* No Sanitation Scheme Areas within WSA

14 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.2.1 Blue Drop Status 2.2 WATER SECURITY 2.2.1.1 Service Quality - Blue Drop

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu Blue Drop Õ !Kheis Ô Certification Status Local Municipality %, Yes (0) NIEKERKSHOOP ORANGE RIVER TO MARYDALE %, No (0) NIEKERKSHOOP %, Unknown (1) ORANGE RIVER TO NIEKERKSHOOP

MARYDALE INFORMAL A MARYDALE MARYDALE Northern Cape Pixley ka Seme

Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Local Municipality

PRIESKA% PRIESKA

COPPERTON COPPERTON

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA PIXLEY KA SEME FARMS Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Water Scheme Areas Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality 15 * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.2.2 Green Drop Status 2.2 WATER SECURITY 2.2.2.1 Water Services - Green Drop

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu Green Drop Õ !Kheis Ô Certification Status Local Municipality %, Yes (0) %, No (3) NIEKERKSHOOP % -)! %, Unknown (0)

WWTW - COMPLIANCE TO: % MARYDALE INFORMAL A MARYDALE -)! Supervisory Staff Northern Cape Requirements Pixley ka Seme ! No ! Yes ! Unknown Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Local Process Controller Municipality Staff Requirements ) No

PRIESKA ) Yes % -)! ) Unknown O&M Staff Requirements - No - Yes - Unknown Status of O&M -) Staff Requirements COPPERTON Process Contoller Staff Requirements

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Sanitation Scheme Areas Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality 16 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.2.3 Source Requirements 2.1 WATER SECURITY 2.2.3.1 Resource Needs

SCHEME SOLUTIONS LOCALITY MAP (All Town Strategies) Current Water Supply Deficit John Taolo Yes Gaetsewe

No Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard No Data Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Scheme Requirement Solution Namakwa No Data Source Investigation and Protection Infrastructure Solution

Resource Development Z F Mgcawu SIYATHEMBA LM WSA Water Conservation & !Kheis Demand Management Total Households: 5 038 Total Population: 21 244 Local Municipality None NIEKERKSHOOP RESOURCE NEEDS: ORANGE RIVER TO MARYDALE NIEKERKSHOOP Local Solutions

ORANGE RIVER TO NIEKERKSHOOP Settlements with access to infrastructure but inadequate MARYDALE INFORMAL A MARYDALE supply becasue of source problems MARYDALE Northern Cape RESOURCE NEEDS Settlements with access to Pixley ka Seme infrastructure but no access to water because of source problems Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Local Households Population Municipality 0 0

Affected Settlements PRIESKA PRIESKA 0

COPPERTON COPPERTON

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA PIXLEY KA SEME FARMS Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Water Scheme Areas Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality 17 * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW 2.2.3 Source Requirements 2.1 WATER SECURITY 2.2.3.2 Conservation & Demand Management

Scheme Name Scheme 1 2 3 4 5 6 6A 7 7A 8.1 8.2 8.2.1 8.2.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.5.1 8.5.2 8.5.3 8.6 9 11 12 13 14 Number TW TW water Other WWTW Treated Unbilled Flat Rate Supplied Recycled Raw Water Water Raw Purchased Abstracted Abstracted Authorized Authorized Authorized Authorized Unmetered Data Errors Data Real Losses Real Groundwater Surface Water Water Surface Water Surface Consumption: Consumption: Consumption: Billed Metered Consumption: Total Influent at Free Basic Water Basic Free Apparent Losses Apparent Unbilled Metered Total Discharged Groundwater Not Billed Unmetered Portable Water to Portable Water other neighbours Total Received at at Total Received Apparent Losses: Losses: Apparent Losses: Apparent Losses: Apparent Inaccurate Meters Inaccurate Billed Unmetered: Billed Unmetered: Billed Unmetered: Purchased treated treated Purchased Total Treatment at Totalat Treatment Returned toReturned source Illegal Connections COPPERTON S03NC00104 MARYDALE S03D72C001 NIEKERKSHOOP S03D71D001 ORANGE RIVER TO MARYDALE NCBULK 10 ORANGE RIVER TO NIEKERKSHOOP NCBULK 9 PIXLEY KA SEME FARMS S03PKS001 PRIESKA S03D72A001

18 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.3.1 Unserved (None) 2.3 NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 2.3.1.1 Water Unserved - Local & Scheme Based Solutions

WATER UNSERVED: LOCALITY MAP NEW SCHEME REQUIREMENT New Schemes not part John Taolo of an existing scheme Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Internal Bulk Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Households 0 Namakwa Population 0

Affected Settlements 0

Regional Bulk Z F Mgcawu SIYATHEMBA LM WSA !Kheis Households 0 Total Households: 5 038 Total Population: 21 244 Local Municipality Population 0 WATER UNSERVED: LOCAL SOLUTION Affected Settlements 0 NIEKERKSHOOP Settlements having no formal water infrastructure

MARYDALE INFORMAL A MARYDALE WATER UNSERVED Northern Cape (LOCAL SOLUTION) Settlements having no Pixley ka Seme formal water infrastructure Households Population Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle 35 130 Local Municipality Affected Settlements 4 PRIESKA

COPPERTON

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality 19 * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.3.1 Unserved (None) 2.3 NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 2.3.1.2 Sanitation Unserved - Dry & Wet Sanitation

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu SIYATHEMBA LM WSA !Kheis Total Households: 5 038 Local Municipality Total Population: 21 244 SANITATION UNSERVED: DRY NIEKERKSHOOP Settlements having no formal sanitation infrastructure

MARYDALE INFORMAL A SANITATION: DRY MARYDALE Northern Cape UNSERVED Settlements having no Pixley ka Seme formal sanitation infrastructure Households Population Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle 0 0 Local Municipality Affected Settlements 0

PRIESKA SANITATION UNSERVED: WET Settlements not part of an existing sanitation scheme SANITATION: WET

NEW SCHEMES not part of an existing sanitation scheme Households Population COPPERTON 0 0

Affected Settlements

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality 20 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.3.2 Under Served 2.3 NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 2.3.2.1 Water Under Served

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu SIYATHEMBA LM WSA !Kheis Total Households: 5 038 Local Municipality Total Population: 21 244 WATER UNDER SERVED NIEKERKSHOOP Settlements requiring extension to existing infrastructure MARYDALE INFORMAL A MARYDALE WATER Northern Cape UNDER SERVED Pixley ka Seme Settlements requiring extension to existing infrastructure Households Population Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Local 0 0 Municipality Affected Settlements

PRIESKA 0

COPPERTON

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality 21 * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality

Blank Page (For map sequence) 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.3.2 Under Served 2.3 NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 2.3.2.2 Sanitation Under Served - Dry Sanitation

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu SIYATHEMBA LM WSA !Kheis Total Households: 5 038 Local Municipality Total Population: 21 244 SANITATION UNDER SERVED NIEKERKSHOOP Dry Sanitation

MARYDALE INFORMAL A MARYDALE Households Northern Cape Buckets to VIP Pixley ka Seme Households 0 Population 0 Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Affected Settlements 0 Local Municipality Households Pit to VIP PRIESKA Households 0

Population 0

Affected Settlements 0

COPPERTON

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality 22 * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality 2. SITUATION ASSESSMENT (BACKLOG CONSENSUS) - RELIABILITY INDEX PROCESS FLOW

2.3.2 Under Served 2.3 NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 2.3.2.2 Sanitation Under Served - Wet Sanitation

LOCALITY MAP

John Taolo Gaetsewe

Z F Mgcawu Frances Baard Pixley ka Seme Siyancuma Local Municipality Namakwa

Z F Mgcawu SIYATHEMBA LM WSA Total Households: 5 038 !Kheis Total Population: 21 244 Local Municipality SANITATION UNDER SERVED

NIEKERKSHOOP Wet Sanitation

Households

MARYDALE INFORMAL A Buckets to Waterborne MARYDALE

Northern Cape Households 0 Pixley ka Seme Population 0 Affected Settlements 0 Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Households Local VIP to Waterborne Municipality Households 0

PRIESKA Population 0

Affected Settlements 0

Households Pit to Waterborne

Households 0

Population 0

Affected Settlements 0

COPPERTON

BASE MAP LEGEND Siyathemba Local Municipality WSA Provincial Boundaries District Municipal Boundaries Local Municipal Boundaries Settlements

Emthanjeni Local Municipality * Physical Infrastructure to deliver water Kareeberg Local Municipality 23 3. GOVERNANCE

3.1 Improved Water Governance (Institutional)

No. Indicator Description Score 2 Management Skill Level (Technical) 45% 3 Staff Skill Levels (Technical) 20% 5 Water Resource Management (WRM) 30% 9 Wastewater/Environmental Safety & Regulatory Compliance 35% 12 Financial Management 30% 14 Financial Asset Management 25% 15 Information Management (IT) 45% 16 Organisational Performance Monitoring 40% 18 Customer Care (CRM) 40%

24 3. GOVERNANCE 3.1 Improved Water Governance (Institutional)

Context Information MuSSA Status Comments 25 C1 Municipality name Siyathemba Local Muncipality C2 Date of completion 05 June 2017 C3 Municipality type B3 - LM C4 Water service provider type Internal (i.e. municipality) C5 Wastewater service provider type Internal (i.e. municipality) C6 Water system maintenance Internal (i.e. municipality) C7 Wastewater system maintenance Internal (i.e. municipality) You are able to respond within necessary timeframes to C8 emergencies, via internal staff and resources, or through other procurement processes (e.g. 'as and when' required contracts) In place, with occasional non-optimal response C9 The key staff (i.e. managerial) turnover in your WSA Moderate: 10 - 25% (i.e. occasionally lose staff)

C10 Your WSA has developed and implemented a scarce skills policy No, not developed Your WSA is preparing for the impacts of pending and/or new C11 regulations (for e.g. Regulation 813 (previously Regulation 17) (WTW and WWTW process controllers)) In process Your WSA actively provides required drinking water related data to C12 the Regulator (e.g. Blue Drop participation) Yes, strongly agree Regular drinking-water quality monitoring and management C13 (including boreholes) is performed for ALL communities/towns in the WSA Yes, all (i.e. 100% of WSA population) WTWs operational capacity as a function of total design capacity C14 (NOTE: Combine for ALL WTWs within your WSA) <90% Your WSA actively provides required wastewater related data to C15 the Regulator (e.g. Green Drop participation) Yes, strongly agree Regular wastewater quality monitoring and management is C16 performed for ALL wastewater systems in the WSA Yes, all (i.e. 100%) WWTWs operational flow capacity as a function of total design C17 capacity (NOTE: Combine for ALL WWTWs within your WSA) 90% - 95% WWTWs operational COD load as a function of total design load C18 (NOTE: Combine for ALL WWTWs within your WSA) 90% - 95% Your WSA actively provides required water conservation and water C19 demand management related data to the Regulator (e.g. No Drop participation) Yes, strongly agree Your WSA actively promotes improved hygiene practices through C20 campaigns in communities (e.g. hand washing education, safe and improved sanitation) Partially in place, but not ideal Billing & accounts - With regards to water and sanitation bills, C21 Actual billing and posting of accounts on a monthly please indicate the frequency of billing and posting of accounts. basis Development contributions - With regard to new developments, by- laws in your municipality require developers to adequately C22 contribute towards construction of new bulk infrastructure (i.e. developers charges). In process Please indicate what proportion of your requested water and C23 sanitation services budget (CAPEX and OPEX) is actually funded? >80% - 90% Yes, strongly agree (i.e. Council meetings are held at C24 Council is stable with functional Council meetings. least quarterly) Council has functional Oversight Committees and Ward C25 Committees, as appropriate (DM would be served via LM Ward Committees) Partially in place, but not ideal Council has effective systems of internal control and functional C26 governance structures (internal audit unit, audit committee, risk committee, IT governance) Partially in place, but not ideal Forensic investigations are undertaken as and when necessary to ensure adherence to governance requirements (i.e. either C27 internally initiated by the municipality or externally initiated by, for example, Public Protector, Auditor General) No, disagree Your municipality actively implements actions against identified C28 instances of fraud and corruption, maladministration and failure to fulfil statutory obligations Partially in place, but not ideal Your municipality has policies, procedures and systems in place C29 that negate the impact of vandalism / sabotage of municipal water and sanitation infrastructure on services delivery No, disagree Your municipality has ongoing and appropriate public C30 participation, is transparent in its decision making, and is accountable to its constituency (fiscal and social). Partially in place, but not ideal 3. GOVERNANCE 3.1 Improved Water Governance (Institutional)

Context Information MuSSA Status Comments 25 Those of your 18 MuSSA Business Aspects which reflect Extreme C31 and/or Highly Vulnerable, are included within your WSAs Corporate Risk Register Partially in place, but not ideal Your MuSSA was completed with appropriate inputs from senior C32 officials within Technical Services, Finance and Human Resources Yes, strongly agree (i.e. Technical Services HOD, (as a minimum these 3 departments should participate). Finance AND HR all participated)

Mr IWJ Stadhouer, Municipal Manager, 053 353 5306, [email protected] Mr J Badenhorst, Corporate Services Manager, 053 353 5300, [email protected] Mr J Basson, Technical Manager, 053 353 5306, Mr H Meiring, Chief Financial Officer, 053 353 5300, [email protected]

Names, designation and contact details (phone, email) of all 0 C33 MuSSA participants (e.g. Mr Thabo Smit; Technical Director; 0215436789; [email protected]) 0

WSA Comments and Current Agreed Responsible 1. Water Services Planning MuSSA Status Interventions Strategic Action (Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget Your Water Services Development Plan (WSDP) and associated master planning processes includes appropriate Water and Sewage Master Plans, Water Safety Plans and a Wastewater Risk Yes, appropriate water services plans are developed Abatement Plans (W2RAPs), and is aligned to the IDP and and include all required plans and alignment (i.e. > 1.1 associated SDBIP targets. 95%) Municipal water and sanitation services plans adopted 1.2 You are implementing an up-to-date and adopted WSDP. but not yet implemented Your current project list addresses existing needs/shortcomings identified through the WSDP and associated master planning 1.3 process. Most projects (i.e. >75%) Project progress is monitored, tracked and reported to municipal top management/council and the Regulator (through the annual Yes, strongly agree (both to municipal top 1.4 water and sanitation services report) management/council and Regulator) Projects identified through your various planning processes have 1.5 been implemented in the last 3 years. Most implemented (i.e. >75%) WSA Comments and Responsible 2. Management Skill Level (Technical) MuSSA Status Current Interventions Agreed Strategic Action (Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget

Your council approved technical management organisational organogram meets your business requirements, and key posts are filled (e.g. Technical Director, Water Services Manager, Sanitation 2.1 Services Manager). Yes, and most posts filled (i.e. >75%)

You have sufficient technical management staff (appropriate 2.2 number of staff - e.g. at least 5 posts per 100,000 persons served). Mostly agree (i.e. >75% as per approved organogram) Technical management staff have the correct skills/qualifications and experience as per Job Description requirements (e.g. if Job Description requires PrEng, PrTech or CPM, the staff have these 2.3 qualifications). Some (i.e. >50%) Managers regularly attend appropriate water and sanitation 2.4 services skills development/training. No skills development/ training Key technical managers (e.g. Section 56 and other Senior Management) have signed and monitored Performance 2.5 Agreements. <50% WSA Comments and 3. Staff Skill Levels (Technical) MuSSA Status Current Interventions Agreed Strategic Action Responsible(Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget 3. GOVERNANCE 3.1 Improved Water Governance (Institutional)

Context Information MuSSA Status Comments 25

WTWs are operated by staff with the correct skills/qualifications 3.1 and experience (as per Regulation 2834). <50%

WWTWs are operated by staff with the correct skills/qualifications 3.2 and experience (as per Regulation 2834). <50%

Water system plumbers, millwrights, mechanics and electricians 3.3 have the correct skills/qualifications and experience. <50%

Sewage system plumbers, millwrights, mechanics and electricians 3.4 have the correct skills/qualifications and experience. <50%

Staff regularly attend appropriate water and sanitation services 3.5 skills development/training (including safety) (e.g. ESETA courses). No skills development/ training WSA Comments and 4. Technical Staff Capacity (Numbers) MuSSA Status Current Interventions Agreed Strategic Action Responsible(Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget

Your council approved technical staff organisational organogram meets your business requirements, and posts are filled (i.e. Yes, and most posts filled (i.e. >75%) as per the 4.1 Superintendent of WTWs/WWTWs and below). approved organogram WTWs are operated by the appropriate number of staff (as per 4.2 Regulation 2834). Agree somewhat (i.e. >50% as per requirements) WWTWs are operated by the appropriate number of staff (as per 4.3 Regulation 2834). Strongly agree (i.e. >95% as per requirements) You have sufficient water and sewerage/sanitation network operations and repair staff/plumbers (i.e. you have the appropriate Mostly agree (i.e. >75% as per functional 4.4 number of staff). requirements) An active mentoring/shadowing programme is in place where 4.5 experienced staff train younger, inexperienced staff. In place, but not ideal WSA Comments and Current 5. Water Resource Management (WRM) MuSSA Status Interventions Agreed Strategic Action Responsible(Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget The results from the Reconciliation Strategies (Large Systems/All Towns) have been incorporated into your WSDP, master planning 5.1 and IDP processes. No, disagree The quantity of water available from the resources is sufficient for your current WSA needs (at the stipulated level of assurance of 5.2 supply). 21-30% shortage The quantity of water available from the resources is sufficient for your future WSA needs (at the stipulated level of assurance of 5.3 supply) (i.e. no shortage in 10 years). 31-40% shortage Mostly agree (i.e. >75% of sources by water volume are 5.4 The source water quality is currently acceptable for its purpose. acceptable)

5.5 The trend indicates a deteriorating source water quality. >25% of sources by water volume are deteriorating WSA Comments and Agreed Responsible 6. Water Conservation & Demand Management (WC/WDM) MuSSA Status Current Interventions Strategic Action (Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget Your WSA has developed a council approved Water Conservation and Water Demand Strategy which includes a standard water 6.1 balance (e.g. modified IWA). Only water balance developed Please indicate your percentage Non-Revenue Water (NRW) as per 6.2 the modified IWA water balance. Less than 40% System input volumes (bulk) to the WSA are accurately monitored 6.3 using bulk meters (e.g. check metering). <50% Please indicate what percentage of all connections are metered and billed (residential and non-residential (commercial, industrial, 6.4 etc.)). >98%

Your WSA is implementing appropriate intervention programmes to reduce NRW (e.g. minimisation of night flows through pressure management, removal of unlawful connections, leak detection and 6.5 repairs, consumer education/awareness). Mostly agree (i.e. >75% implementation) WSA Comments and Current Agreed 7. Drinking Water Safety & Regulatory Compliance MuSSA Status Interventions Strategic Action Responsible(Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget Please indicate your microbiological drinking-water quality compliance for E.coli (or faecal coliforms) for the communities you 7.1 are monitoring for the last 12 months. < 95% ALL your supply schemes, WTWs, process controllers, monitoring programmes, sample points, laboratories, results, procedures, protocols, etc. are registered/frequently updated with the 7.2 Regulator (e.g. via the BDS). Yes, strongly agree (i.e. 100% covered)

Council have been made aware of all water safety plan related issues (including those identified via the Blue Drop Certification 7.3 programme) and issues have been actioned (where applicable). Mostly agree (i.e. >75% tabled) 3. GOVERNANCE 3.1 Improved Water Governance (Institutional)

Context Information MuSSA Status Comments 25 Sufficient funds have been made available to address all these 7.4 identified water safety related issues. Agree somewhat (i.e. >50% of required funds) Required corrective actions/remedial measures to address all these identified water safety related issues have been successfully 7.5 implemented. Agree somewhat (i.e. >50% implementation) WSA Comments and Current Agreed 8. Basic Sanitation MuSSA Status Interventions Strategic Action Responsible(Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget You have formal housing areas that are not fully serviced with Yes, but these are new households that will be 8.1 sanitation infrastructure serviced within 2 years Yes, still trying to meet informal or rural backlog with You have informal housing or rural areas that are not fully serviced <60% serviced (e.g. occurrence of bucket systems, 8.2 with sanitation infrastructure existence of open defecation)

You have a detailed plan and programme to provide safe sanitation to all households (including health and hygiene education and user 8.3 awareness including Water, Sanitation and Health (WASH) aspects) Mostly agree (i.e. >75% implementation) Your sanitation budget is appropriate for required sanitation 8.4 programmes (implementation and O&M) No funds (i.e. 0%) You are servicing your pit latrines and maintaining your sewers and wastewater treatment facilities as per safe sanitation requirements (healthy, environmentally safe, structurally sound, regularly 8.5 maintained). Mostly agree (i.e. >75% as per requirements) WSA Comments and Current Responsible 9. Wastewater/Environmental Safety & Regulatory Compliance MuSSA Status Interventions Agreed Strategic Action (Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget Please indicate your treated wastewater effluent compliance for COD for your (or your service provider's) WWTWs for the last 12 9.1 months. <80% ALL your WWTWs, process controllers, monitoring programmes, sample points, laboratories, results, procedures, protocols, etc. are registered/frequently updated with the Regulator (e.g. via the 9.2 GDS). < 50% covered Council have been aware of all W2RAP related issues (e.g. pollution incidents, Green Drop deficiencies) and issues have been actioned 9.3 (where applicable). Agree somewhat (i.e. >50% tabled)

Sufficient funds have been made available to address all identified 9.4 wastewater and environmental safety related issues. Agree somewhat (i.e. >50% of required funds) Required corrective actions/remedial measures to address all identified wastewater and environmental safety related issues 9.5 have been successfully implemented. Agree somewhat (i.e. >50% implementation) WSA Comments and Agreed Responsible 10. Infrastructure Asset Management (IAM) MuSSA Status Current Interventions Strategic Action (Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget

You have an appropriate and up-to-date water and sanitation services Asset Register (includes asset name, location, condition, extent, remaining useful life, performance and risk). NOTE: This Yes, agree (e.g. basic asset register - i.e. not all aspects 10.1 does only not refer to GRAP17 asset register requirements. included) You have developed an appropriate Infrastructure Asset 10.2 Management (IAM) Plan for your WSA. Partially in place, but not ideal 10.3 You are implementing the IAM outcomes Agree somewhat (i.e. >50% implementation) Budget allocated to implement IAM outcomes is sufficient and is 10.4 being effectively spent. < 50% You conduct annual technical assessments of your water and wastewater related systems (including sources, WTWs, WWTWs, pump stations, network, etc.) and implement required follow-up 10.5 actions. Most systems (i.e. >75%) WSA Comments and Agreed Responsible 11. Operation & Maintenance of Assets MuSSA Status Current Interventions Strategic Action (Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget

A maintenance workshop/store that is secure and stocked with 11.1 essential equipment (e.g. spare parts) and tools is available. Partially in place, but not ideal Appropriate water and sanitation services infrastructure/equipment planned/preventative maintenance 11.2 schedules are developed. Partially in place, but not ideal Appropriate planned/preventative maintenance is performed at all WTWs and associated reservoirs, pump stations, distribution 11.3 network. Most (i.e. >75%)

Appropriate planned/preventative maintenance is performed at all 11.4 WWTWs and associated collection system, pump stations. Most (i.e. >75%)

Please indicate your infrastructure repairs and maintenance costs 11.5 as a function of total operating expenditure (%). 5% - <8% WSA Comments and Current Agreed Responsible 12. Financial Management MuSSA Status Interventions Strategic Action (Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget 3. GOVERNANCE 3.1 Improved Water Governance (Institutional)

Context Information MuSSA Status Comments 25 Financial controls - With regard to your last audit report on the 12.1 financial statements, please state the audit opinion. Disclaimer of audit opinion Cash flow status - Please state your Cash/Cost Coverage Ratio 12.2 (excluding Unspent Conditional Grants) < 30 days Your actual operating expenditure closely reflects your budgeted operating expenditure (i.e. Operating Expenditure Budget 12.3 Implementation Indicator) 85% - <90%

Your actual revenue closely reflects your budgeted operating 12.4 revenue (i.e. Operating Revenue Budget Implementation Indicator) 90% - <95% Liabilities (Creditors) - Money is owed by your municipality to major/critical service providers (e.g. ESKOM, Water Board, largest contractors, etc.) for more than 30 days from receipt of invoice 12.5 (NOTE : Ignore disputed invoices) More frequently than quarterly WSA Comments and Current Agreed Responsible 13. Revenue Collection MuSSA Status Interventions Strategic Action (Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget 13.1 Please indicate the frequency of actual meter readings. Actual meter reading on a monthly basis Net Surplus/Deficit - Please state your net surplus/deficit from water services activities for the last 12 months ( NOTE: This question tests whether your WSA currently has fully cost reflective Water and Sanitation tariffs (which take into account cost of maintenance and renewal of purification plants and networks, and 13.2 the cost of new infrastructure). Surplus (i.e. >0%) Revenue collection - Please state the revenue collection rate in 13.3 respect to Water & Sanitation Services (%) <50% Revenue Growth - Please state your Water and Sanitation Services 13.4 revenue growth for the last 12 months (%). >CPI Grant dependency - Actual operating revenue less operational grants/subsidies (e.g. equitable share) sufficiently covers actual 13.5 operating expenditure. Some (i.e. > 50%) WSA Comments and Current Responsible 14. Financial Asset Management MuSSA Status Interventions Agreed Strategic Action (Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget

Capital Expenditure (Municipal) - Please state your municipal Capital Expenditure as a percentage of Total Expenditure (i.e. Total 14.1 Operating Expenditure + Capital Expenditure) 10% - <15%

Capital Expenditure (Water Services) - Please state your Capital Expenditure on Water and Sanitation Services as a percentage of 14.2 Total Capital Expenditure (Capital Expenditure (Municipal)) <25% Asset Renewal - Please state your Asset Renewal investment as 14.3 percentage of Depreciation costs None (i.e. 0%) Repairs and Maintenance - Please state your Repairs and Maintenance expenditure as a percentage of Property, Plant and 14.4 Equipment, Investment Property (Carrying Value) 5% - <8% Grant funding of capital expenditure - Please state your reliance on 14.5 grant funding >90% WSA Comments and Current Agreed Responsible 15. Information Management (IT) MuSSA Status Interventions Strategic Action (Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget You have a developed, approved and implemented IT Master Systems Plan (e.g. covering 3 - 5 years) that addresses your IT 15.1 business requirements. No, disagree You have a developed, approved and implemented ICT Technology Master Plan that addresses your current and future IT 15.2 infrastructure requirements. No, disagree You have IT systems that support your full range of water and sanitation services business requirements (e.g. billing, GIS, 15.3 customer care, O&M, asset management). Mostly agree (i.e. >75% of required systems) ICT service continuity - Adequate IT security exists with off-site back-ups/archiving of operation critical applications, databases, data, etc. routinely performed in terms of an IT Disaster Recovery 15.4 Plan. Yes, strongly agree (i.e. All (100%) in place) You have sufficient budget and staff to keep key IT systems stable 15.5 and up-to-date as per IT policies and procedures. Agree somewhat (i.e. >50%) WSA Comments and Current Responsible 16. Organisational Performance Monitoring MuSSA Status Interventions Agreed Strategic Action (Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget Appropriate plans, policies and procedures to address Disaster Management/emergencies and other issues (safety, public participation, communication, etc.) are developed and implemented. NOTE: Although Disaster Management is a district function, LMs need to ensure they are aware of their associated 16.1 roles and responsibilities. In development 3. GOVERNANCE 3.1 Improved Water Governance (Institutional)

Context Information MuSSA Status Comments 25

An organisational performance management system is developed and implemented (i.e. effectively measure, monitor and track 16.2 water and sanitation services performance indicators). In development A municipal risk management framework is developed and implemented and includes monitoring and tracking of water and 16.3 sanitation related risks. In development Effective administration support is available to technical staff to assist with processing work orders, providing order numbers, 16.4 handling correspondence, etc. Mostly agree (i.e. >75% effective) "Access to Basic Water and Sanitation Services" progress reports are frequently produced and presented to council for discussion, 16.5 action and follow-up. At least annually WSA Comments and Current Responsible 17. Water and Sanitation Service Quality MuSSA Status Interventions Agreed Strategic Action (Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget Critical business databases and documents (e.g. as-built drawings, records, manuals, agreements, billing/revenue collection, project and scheme management data, etc.) are current, maintained and stored in secure locations (on-site and off-site, both paper and 17.1 electronic). Mostly agree (i.e. >75% in place) Customers have adequate access to water (at least basic services and no backlogs, sufficient quantity and flow, good quality, Most have a functional, reliable and safe service (i.e. 17.2 minimal interruptions). >75%) Customers have adequate access to sanitation (at least basic services and no backlogs, no blockages, minimal impact on 17.3 environment). Yes, all (i.e. 100%) All consumers served experience interruptions of less than 48 hours (at any given time) and a cumulative interruption time during >90% of households do not experience pressure 17.4 the year of less than 15 days. problems Households in your WSA experience water pressure problems (no Yes, all customers have a functional, reliable, dignified flow/partial flow less than 10 litres/minute) (not to be confused and safe service with no impact on the environment 17.5 with interruption to supply). (i.e. 100%) WSA Comments and Current Responsible 18. Customer Care (CRM) MuSSA Status Interventions Agreed Strategic Action (Who) Completion (When) Proposed Budget A functional customer service system manned by appropriate customer services representatives and using a complaints register, is in place to address complaints and appropriately inform customers of service interruptions, contamination of water, boil 18.1 water alert, etc. Partially in place, but not ideal Regular customer satisfaction surveys are conducted to determine customer satisfaction levels and inform the Customer Care 18.2 Management Plan No customer satisfaction surveys

Please indicate what percentage of the reported water related 18.3 complaints/callouts are responded to within 24 hours. Most (i.e. >75%) Please indicate what percentage of the reported wastewater/sanitation related complaints/callouts are responded 18.4 to within 24 hours. Most (i.e. >75%)

A comprehensive customer awareness programme (informing customers of water and wastewater system O&M activities, water quality, resource protection/pollution, reporting incidents/security 18.5 concerns, etc.) is in place and implemented. No, disagree (i.e. no awareness programme) 25

Blank Page (For map sequence) 3. GOVERNANCE

3.2 Financial 3.2.1 Water Services Financial Diagram

Total Equitable Revenue Transfer REVENUE MIG RBIG WSIG Other Revenue Shares Collection Subsidies for Water

R R R R R R R R

Total Existing New Project Define Existing Total O&M OPERATION & MAINTENANCE O&M Cost O&M regional O&M budget Budget Model Requirements System

R R R R

NON-REVENUE LOSSES R

26 3. GOVERNANCE

3.2 Financial 3.2.2 Cost to Ensure Existing Reliable Services

Cost to Ensure Existing Reliable Services Cost (RM) Cost to Ensure Existing Reliable Services Cost (RM)

2.1 FUNCTIONALITY 3 GOVERNANCE 2.1.1 Operation & Maintenance 3.1 Water Services Planning 2.1.1.1 Water Operation & Maintenance (Local & Scheme Based) 3.2 Management Skill Level (Technical) 2.1.1.2 Sanitation Operation & Maintenance (Local & Scheme Based) 3.3 Staff Skill Levels (Technical) 2.1.2 Refurbishment 3.4 Technical Staff Capacity (Numbers) 2.1.2.1 Water Refurbish & Recover (Local & Scheme Based) 3.5 Water Resource Management (WRM) 2.1.2.2 Sanitation Refurbish & Recover (Local Solution - Dry Sanitation) 3.6 Water Conservation & Water Demand Management (WC/WDM) 2.1.2.3 Sanitation Refurbish & Recover (Scheme Based - Wet Sanitation) 3.7 Drinking Water Safety & Regulatory Compliance 2.1.3 Replace Old 3.8 Basic Sanitation 2.1.3.1 Water Scheme Based Life Span Reached 3.9 Wastewater/Environmental Safety & Regulatory Compliance 2.1.3.2 Water Component Based Incident Matrix 3.10 Infrastructure Asset Management (IAM) 2.1.3.3 Sanitation Scheme Based Life Span Reached 3.11 Operation & Maintenance of Assets 2.1.3.4 Sanitation Component Based Incident Matrix 3.12 Financial Management TOTAL 0.000 3.13 Revenue Collection 3.14 Financial Asset Management 3.15 Information Management (IT) 2.2 WATER SECURITY 3.16 Organisational Performance Monitoring 2.2.1 Blue Drop Status 3.17 Water and Sanitation Service Quality 2.2.1.1 Service Quality - Blue Drop 3.18 Customer Care (CRM) 2.2.2 Green Drop Status TOTAL 0.000 2.2.2.1 Water Services - Green Drop 2.2.3 Source Requirements 2.2.3.1 Resource Needs 2.2.3.2 Conservation & Demand Management TOTAL 0.000

2.3 NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 2.3.1 Unserved (None) 2.3.1.1 Water Unserved (Local & Scheme Based) 2.3.1.2 Sanitation Unserved (Dry & Wet Sanitation) 2.3.2 Under Served

2.3.2.1 Water Under Served 2.3.2.2 Sanitation Under Served - Dry Sanitation 2.3.2.3 Sanitation Under Served - Wet Sanitation TOTAL 0.000

27 4. EXISTING NEEDS VS EXISTING IDENTIFIED POJECTS - MATRIX SUMMARY

4.1 Water Scheme Summary

Aim is to link existing needs against existing projects

BACKLOG CONSENSUS REQUIREMENTS (Yes, No or Unknown)

FUNCTIONALITY WATER SECURITY NEW INFRASTRUCTURE

Problem Replace Operation & Source addressed by Refurbish & Replace Old Type Total Maintenance Requirements Existing (Aged Infra) Interpretation & Solution Description Project Numbers (Local/Scheme) Settlements Project (Yes, No or Partially) Blue Drop Status Unserved Under Served New Schemes INTERNAL BULK New Schemes REGIONAL BULK Local Solutions Scheme Based Solution Local Solution Scheme Based Solution Scheme Based Life Span Resource Needs Current Water Supply Deficit Local Solution Settlements

COPPERTON YY

MARYDALE YY

NIEKERKSHOOP YY

ORANGE RIVER TO MARYDALE NN

ORANGE RIVER TO NIEKERKSHOOP NN

PIXLEY KA SEME FARMS NN

PRIESKA YY

28 4. EXISTING NEEDS VS EXISTING IDENTIFIED POJECTS - MATRIX SUMMARY

4.2 Sanitation Scheme Summary

Aim is to link existing needs against existing projects

BACKLOG CONSENSUS REQUIREMENTS (Yes, No or Unknown) WATER FUNCTIONALITY NEW INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY Problem Replace Operation & addressed by Refurbish & Replace Old Type Total Maintenance Existing (Aged Infra) Interpretation & Solution Description Project Numbers (Local/Scheme) Settlements Project (Yes, No or Partially) Green Drop Status Unserved New Schemes Under Served Sanitation Dry Under Served Wet Sanitation Local Solutions Scheme Based Solution Local Solution Scheme Based Solution Scheme Based Life Span Local Solution Settlements

29 5. RELIABILITY INDEX CALCULATION

WATER CALCULATION Reference Factors Total Number of House holds: 10 Total Number of Water Schemes 10 Effecting Factors Contributing Impact related to Households % Effected of Interpreted Total Interpreted Indicator Overall Total HH (Direct (Direct Backlog) Reliability Reliability % Backlog) Need % 1 FUNCTIONALTIY 1.1 Water Operations and Maintenance 1.1.1 Local Solutions 0.00 1.1.1 Water Scheme Based Solutions 0.00 1.2 Refurbishment 0 1.2.1 Refurbish & Recover Local Solutions 0.00 0.00 1.2.1 Water Scheme Based Solutions 0.00 1.3 Replace Old 1.3.1 Water Scheme Based Life Span Reached 0.00 Direct Total Households 2 WATER SECURITY 2.1 Blue Drop Status 100.00 2.1.1 Service Quality - Blue Drop 0.00 2.3 Source Requirements 0 2.3.1 Resource Needs 0.00 0.00 2.3.2 Additional Scheme Requirements (Not Calculated) 0.00 Direct Total Households 3 NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 3.1 Unserved 3.1.1 Water Unserved (Local Solutions & New Schemes) 0.00 0 3.2 Under Served 0.00 3.2.1 Water Under Served 0.00 Direct Total Households

SANITATION CALCULATION Reference Factors Total Number of House holds: 10 Total Number of Water Schemes 10 Effecting Factors Contributing Impact related to Households % Effected of Interpreted Total Interpreted Indicator Overall Total HH (Direct (Direct Backlog) Reliability Reliability % Backlog) Need % 1 FUNCTIONALTIY 1.1 Sanitation Operations and Maintenance 1.1.2 Local Solutions 0.00 1.1.2 Sanitation Scheme Based Solutions 0.00 1.2 Refurbishment 1.2.2 Refurbish & Recover Local Solutions (Dry Sanitation) 0.00 0 1.2.2 Refurbish & Recover Local Solutions (Wet Sanitation) 0.00 0.00 1.2.2 Sanitation Scheme Based Solutions 0.00 1.3 Replace Old 1.3.3 Sanitation Scheme Based Life Span Reached 0.00 Direct Total Households 2 WATER SECURITY 100.00 2.2 Green Drop Status 0 2.2.1 Water Services - Green Drop 0.00 0.00 Direct Total Households 3 NEW INFRASTRUCTURE 3.1 Unserved 3.1.2 Sanitation Unserved (Dry & Wet Sanitation) 0.00 3.2 Under Served 0 3.2.2 Sanitation Under Served (Dry Sanitation) 0.00 0.00 3.2.1 Sanitation Under Served (Wet Sanitation) 0.00 30 Direct Total Households 5. RELIABILITY INDEX CALCULATION

Overall 4 Institutional Interventions (Measures to ensure appropriate resources for implementation, regulation, monitoring and effective use of water services delivery including policy development Reliability %

0.00%

The process for the Reliability Calculations were as follows:

The important aspect is not to allow any double counting of a settlement, HH or needs and go through a process of identifying and elimination of settlements. If a settlement was selected in a step/category it is marked and the HH/ or Needy HH transferred to an Index Need Calculation field, If the same settlement occurs in another need selection, it will not again added to the calculation thus avoiding double counting of settlements and HH’s.

Water Step 1: Identify all the schemes that have a WTW in with “No” Blue Drop score. Select all settlement within those schemes, mark them and add total House hold figure to Interpreted Direct Backlog Needs Calculation Field . (Total HH of settlement because non-working WTW will affect all HH’s within the scheme not only the needy HH’s)

Step 2: Select all Settlement with Water Unserved (No formal Services) – Local Solutions and transfer needy HH’s to Needs Calculation Field (Again if the settlement was selected in above step, it is not again calculated)

Step 3: Select all Settlement with Water Unserved – New Scheme Development Solutions, mark remainder and transfer needy HH’s to Interpreted Direct Backlog Needs Calculation Field (If the settlement was already selected in above steps, it is not again calculated)

Step 4: Select all Settlement with Water Under Served Needs (Extension), mark remainder and transfer needy HH’s to Interpreted Direct Backlog Needs Calculation Field (If the settlement was already selected in above steps, it is not again calculated)

Step 5: Select all Settlement with Refurbishment Needs ( Local Solutions), mark remainder and transfer needy HH’s to Interpreted Direct Backlog Needs Calculation Field (If the settlement was already selected in above steps, it is not again calculated)

Step 6: Select all Settlement with Resource Needs, mark remainder and transfer needy HH’s to Interpreted Direct Backlog Needs Calculation Field (If the settlement was already selected in above steps, it is not again calculated)

Step 7: Select all Settlement with O&M Needs (Local Solutions), mark remainder and transfer needy HH’s to Interpreted Direct Backlog Needs Calculation Field (If the settlement was already selected in above steps, it is not again calculated)

Step 8: Select Schemes with Refurbishment needs, select all remaining settlement within those schemes that were not already previously selected and transfer direct backlog needy HH’s to Interpreted Direct Backlog Needs Calculation Field

Step 9: Select Schemes with O & M needs, select all remaining settlement within those schemes that were not already previously selected and transfer direct backlog needy HH’s to Interpreted Direct Backlog Needs Calculation Field

Step 10: Select Schemes with Life Span Reached, select all remaining settlement within those schemes that were not already previously selected and transfer direct backlog needy HH’s to Interpreted Direct Backlog Needs Calculation Field

The total of the above selected HH’s will provide a Need Indicator and Need Indicator %. The remainder will provide a Reliability Services %

Sanitation. The same steps were followed but on Settlement Sanitation Fields, Sanitation schemes and WWTW Green Drop Score. 31 5. RELIABILITY INDEX CALCULATION - WATER & SANITATION GRAPHS

New Institutional Water Functionality Water Security Infrastructure Functionality 2011 20 50 10 30 2016 40 30 70 80

2019 60 10 90 90

New Institutional Sanitation Functionality Water Security Infrastructure Functionality 2011 80 30 20 40

2016 95 50 50 60

2019 95 70 80 80

% Water Reliability % Sanitation Reliability 100 100 Projected Projected

90 90

80 80

70 70

# 60 60

50 50

40 40

30 30

20 20

10 10

0 0 2011 2016 2019 2011 2016 2019 Functionality Water Security New Infrastructure Institutional Functionality Functionality Water Security New Infrastructure Institutional Functionality

32 6. BACKLOG ERADICATION SOLUTION (EXISTING PROJECT STATUS SUMMARY)

6.1 Physical Infrastructure Solution

SUMMARY

Year of Cost Council Approved, Committed in Existing Budgets & Included in Implementation (RM) WSDP

Project Number Year 1 - 2014/15 Technical Report Business Plan Part of 5 year Council Project Category Existing Project Project Implemented Project Name Initiative Started Year 2 - 2015/16 Yes/No Yes/No financial cycle Approved & Water / Sanitation (Yes/No) (Yes/No) ** Year 3 - 2016/17 Yes/No Committed Year 4 - 2017/18 Yes/No Year 5 - 2018/19

33 TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER: NRC003/8 MAIN PROJECT NUMBER: NRC003/8 PROJECT PHASE: 34. 1 PERSPECTIVE Aternative Project Number RS27 SUB-PROJECT NUMBER: Water Projects

PROJECT NAME: Marydale Bulk Water Supply PROJECT CATEGORISATION IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Project Main Category: Water DORA Schedule 6B PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Sub Category: Regional Bulk Project Origin: RBIG The project aims to abstract groundwater from 3 new production boreholes which are situated within the town boundaries Accelerated Program PROBLEM DEFINITION Project Weight: 30 Upgrade and extension WSA Project Priority: 1 PROJECT DEFINITION & ADMINISTRATION Province Northern Cape District Municipality: Pixley ka Seme Local Municipality: Siyathemba Water Services Authority Siyathemba Local Municipality Implementing Agent Siyathemba Scheme Number: S03D72C001 Scheme Name: Marydale Bulk Water Supply Contact Person: Mr Johann Badenhorst Contact Number:

MARYDALE INFORMAL A INTERVENTION ACTIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Solution Project Start 2012 Project Type 0 Project Duration 1 NC_Temp124 ACIP New8 Siyathemba Local Municipality Project Extent Project MIG/NC0289/W/09/11 Intervention Horizon Immediate Solution NRC003/8 MIG New MIG New1

DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES PROJECT STATUS M" Infra New Yes Viability Status: Approved Infra Replacement Yes Feasibility Status: Completed MARYDALE Infra Extension No Impl. Readiness Status: Submitted for Approval Infra Refurbishment No Project Status: IRS Study Infra Upgrade No Demand Horizon Year 0 - 5 Design Horizon 15 Year

TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT UT Bulk Pipeline Yes Reticulation Pipeline No Pumpstation No Water Treatment Works No Reservoir or Tank No NUMBER ON MAP: NRC003/8 Power Supply Electricity or Other Yes Feasibility Study Only No PROPOSED OR CURRENT RESOURCE Legend Operation (O&M) No Main Ground Water Project Sub Category Water Infrastructure Maintenance (O&M) No Augmentary None Basic Supply :9 Water Treatment Works Settlements "M Waste Water Treatment Works No Alternative None Internal Bulk Abstraction Works WSA Boundaries Waterborne Sanitation No All Town Strategy Reference 40664 Planning Ú[ Pumpstations VIP Sanitation No All Town Strategy Compliance Yes Regional Bulk UT Reservoirs Source Development Yes Reticulation Bulk Pipe Line RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COST SUMMARY Source Development Resource Development Dam No Actual Cost: 8831109 Resource Development River No Feasibility Cost: 850000 Resource Development Single Borehole Yes 5 Year Allocation (2016 - 2020) 7621247 Resource Development Wellfield No Historical Expenditure 0 Resource Development Spring/Fountain No 2012/13 Expenditure 1300000 Resource Dev. Rainwater Harvesting No 2013/14 Expenditure 0 Water Conservation & Demand Management Yes 2014/15 Expenditure 0 WCDM SITUATION 2015/16 Expenditure 0 2016/17 Fund Allocations 2017/18 Fund Allocations 2018/19 Fund Allocations 2019/20 Fund Allocations 2020/21 Fund Allocations WCDM Illegal Connections No Total Allocation 8921247 0 RBIG 7621247 0 0 0 WCDM Water Wastage No Expenditure to Date 874788,46 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Major Leakage No Total Expenditure 2174788,46 WCDM No Metering No Total Funding Deficit -90138 Total 1617 0 Total 1718 7621247 Total 1819 0 Total 2019 0 Total 2021 0 Comments: Drilling will be completed by end of March 2013. Test results outstanding TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER: MIG/NC0289/W/09/11 MAIN PROJECT NUMBER: MIG/NC0289/W/09/11 PROJECT PHASE: 34. 2 PERSPECTIVE Aternative Project Number SUB-PROJECT NUMBER: Water Projects

PROJECT NAME: 926:Marydale Upgrade of water supply infrastructure PROJECT CATEGORISATION IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Project Main Category: Water DORA Schedule PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Sub Category: Internal Bulk Project Origin: MIG 926:Marydale Upgrade of water supply infrastructure Accelerated Program PROBLEM DEFINITION Project Weight: 37 Upgrade and extension WSA Project Priority: 0 PROJECT DEFINITION & ADMINISTRATION Province Northern Cape District Municipality: Pixley ka Seme Local Municipality: Siyathemba Water Services Authority Siyathemba Local Municipality Implementing Agent Scheme Number: S03D72C001 Scheme Name: Marydale Contact Person: Mr Johann Badenhorst Contact Number:

MARYDALE INFORMAL A INTERVENTION ACTIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Solution Project Start 2013 Project Type 0 Project Duration 1 NC_Temp124 ACIP New8 Siyathemba Local Municipality Project Extent Project MIG/NC0289/W/09/11 Intervention Horizon Immediate Solution NRC003/8 MIG New MIG New1

DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES PROJECT STATUS M" Infra New Yes Viability Status: Approved Infra Replacement No Feasibility Status: Completed MARYDALE Infra Extension Yes Impl. Readiness Status: Infra Refurbishment Yes Project Status: Construction Infra Upgrade Yes Demand Horizon Year 0 - 5 Design Horizon 20 Year

TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT UT Bulk Pipeline Yes Reticulation Pipeline Yes Pumpstation Yes Water Treatment Works No Reservoir or Tank Yes NUMBER ON MAP: MIG/NC0289/W/09/11 Power Supply Electricity or Other Yes Feasibility Study Only No PROPOSED OR CURRENT RESOURCE Legend Operation (O&M) No Main Ground Water Project Sub Category Water Infrastructure Maintenance (O&M) No Augmentary None Basic Supply :9 Water Treatment Works Settlements "M Waste Water Treatment Works No Alternative None Internal Bulk Abstraction Works WSA Boundaries Waterborne Sanitation No All Town Strategy Reference None Planning Ú[ Pumpstations VIP Sanitation No All Town Strategy Compliance Yes Regional Bulk UT Reservoirs Source Development No Reticulation Bulk Pipe Line RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COST SUMMARY Source Development Resource Development Dam No Actual Cost: 5099447 Resource Development River No Feasibility Cost: 0 Resource Development Single Borehole No 5 Year Allocation (2016 - 2020) 0 Resource Development Wellfield No Historical Expenditure 0 Resource Development Spring/Fountain No 2012/13 Expenditure 5099447 Resource Dev. Rainwater Harvesting No 2013/14 Expenditure 0 Water Conservation & Demand Management Yes 2014/15 Expenditure 0 WCDM SITUATION 2015/16 Expenditure 0 2016/17 Fund Allocations 2017/18 Fund Allocations 2018/19 Fund Allocations 2019/20 Fund Allocations 2020/21 Fund Allocations WCDM Illegal Connections Total Allocation 5099447 No 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Water Wastage Yes Expenditure to Date 0 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Major Leakage Yes Total Expenditure 5099447 WCDM No Metering Yes Total Funding Deficit 0 Total 1617 0 Total 1718 0 Total 1819 0 Total 2019 0 Total 2021 0 Comments: Project will be completed by end of March 2013 TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER: ACIP New8 MAIN PROJECT NUMBER: ACIP New8 PROJECT PHASE: 34. 3 PERSPECTIVE Aternative Project Number SUB-PROJECT NUMBER: Water Projects

PROJECT NAME: WCWDM Project Siyathemba PROJECT CATEGORISATION IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Project Main Category: Water DORA Schedule PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Sub Category: Basic Supply Project Origin: ACIP WCWDM Various activities related to WCWDM Accelerated Program PROBLEM DEFINITION Project Weight: 36 Upgrade and extension WSA Project Priority: 0 PROJECT DEFINITION & ADMINISTRATION WEGDRAAI Sol Plaatjie Local Municipality Province Northern Cape GRIEKWASTAD GRIEKWASTAD INFORMAL C District Municipality: Pixley ka Seme GROBLERSHOOP VOLOP BRANDBOOM Local Municipality: Siyathemba Siyancuma Local Municipality

Water Services Authority Siyathemba Local Municipality DOUGLAS INFORMAL B DOUGLAS BUCKLANDS Implementing Agent BACKHOUSE Scheme Number: S03D72A001 Scheme Name: Siyathemba Contact Person: Mr Johann Badenhorst Kai !Garib Local Municipality Contact Number: M" SALT LAKE KENHARDT INFORMAL A M" NIEKERKSHOOPUTÚ[M"UT KENHARDT M" MARYDALEM" !Kheis Local Municipality UTUT INTERVENTION ACTIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Solution Project Start 2014 " Project Type 0 Project Duration 1 M HOPETOWN Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Local Municipality Project Extent Project ACIP New8 PRIESKAUTUTÚ[M":9UT NC_Temp124 New 18 Intervention Horizon Immediate Solution

DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES PROJECT STATUS Infra New No Viability Status: Not yet started Infra Replacement Yes Feasibility Status: Not yet started COPPERTONM" STRYDENBURG Infra Extension No Impl. Readiness Status: Infra Refurbishment No Project Status: Conceptual Hantam Local Municipality Infra Upgrade Yes Demand Horizon Year 0 - 5 M" Design Horizon 20 Year ZWARTKOP

TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT Kareeberg Local Municipality Emthanjeni Local Municipality Bulk Pipeline No

Reticulation Pipeline No VANWYKSVLEI Pumpstation No Water Treatment Works No Reservoir or Tank No NUMBER ON MAP: ACIP New8 Power Supply Electricity or Other No Feasibility Study Only No PROPOSED OR CURRENT RESOURCE Legend Operation (O&M) No Main Surface water dam Project Sub Category Water Infrastructure Maintenance (O&M) No Augmentary Ground Water Basic Supply :9 Water Treatment Works Settlements "M Waste Water Treatment Works No Alternative None Internal Bulk Abstraction Works WSA Boundaries Waterborne Sanitation No All Town Strategy Reference None Planning Ú[ Pumpstations VIP Sanitation No All Town Strategy Compliance Yes Regional Bulk UT Reservoirs Source Development No Reticulation Bulk Pipe Line RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COST SUMMARY Source Development Resource Development Dam No Actual Cost: 2876500 Resource Development River No Feasibility Cost: 0 Resource Development Single Borehole No 5 Year Allocation (2016 - 2020) 0 Resource Development Wellfield No Historical Expenditure 0 Resource Development Spring/Fountain No 2012/13 Expenditure 0 Resource Dev. Rainwater Harvesting No 2013/14 Expenditure 0 Water Conservation & Demand Management Yes 2014/15 Expenditure 0 WCDM SITUATION 2015/16 Expenditure 0 2016/17 Fund Allocations 2017/18 Fund Allocations 2018/19 Fund Allocations 2019/20 Fund Allocations 2020/21 Fund Allocations WCDM Illegal Connections Total Allocation 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Water Wastage Yes Expenditure to Date 0 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Major Leakage Yes Total Expenditure 0 WCDM No Metering No Total Funding Deficit 2876500 Total 1617 0 Total 1718 0 Total 1819 0 Total 2019 0 Total 2021 0 Comments: ACIP BP to be completed and submitted TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER: New 18 MAIN PROJECT NUMBER: New 18 PROJECT PHASE: 34. 4 PERSPECTIVE Aternative Project Number SUB-PROJECT NUMBER: Water Projects

PROJECT NAME: Upgrading of water treatment works PROJECT CATEGORISATION IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Project Main Category: Water DORA Schedule PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Sub Category: Internal Bulk Project Origin: MIG Upgrading of Prieska water treatment works should the Copperton water pipeline be extended to Van Wyksvlei Accelerated Program PROBLEM DEFINITION Project Weight: 42 Upgrade and extension WSA Project Priority: 0 PROJECT DEFINITION & ADMINISTRATION Province Northern Cape District Municipality: Pixley ka Seme Local Municipality: Siyathemba Water Services Authority Siyathemba Local Municipality Implementing Agent Scheme Number: S03D72A001 Scheme Name: Prieska Contact Person: Mr Johann Badenhorst Contact Number:

INTERVENTION ACTIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT :9 Ú[M" Project Solution Project Start 2015 MIG/NC0562/W/15/17 PRIESKA

Project Duration 1 NC_Temp124 ACIP New8 UTSiyathemba Local Municipality Project Type 0 UT UT Project Extent Project UT

Intervention Horizon Immediate Solution New 18 DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES PROJECT STATUS Infra New Yes Viability Status: Approved Infra Replacement No Feasibility Status: Completed Infra Extension Yes Impl. Readiness Status: Infra Refurbishment Yes Project Status: Awaiting Funding Infra Upgrade Yes Demand Horizon Year 0 - 5 Design Horizon 20 Year

TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT Bulk Pipeline No Reticulation Pipeline No Pumpstation No Water Treatment Works Yes Reservoir or Tank No NUMBER ON MAP: New 18 Power Supply Electricity or Other Yes Feasibility Study Only No PROPOSED OR CURRENT RESOURCE Legend Operation (O&M) No Main Surface water dam Project Sub Category Water Infrastructure Maintenance (O&M) No Augmentary Ground Water Basic Supply :9 Water Treatment Works Settlements "M Waste Water Treatment Works No Alternative None Internal Bulk Abstraction Works WSA Boundaries Waterborne Sanitation No All Town Strategy Reference None Planning Ú[ Pumpstations VIP Sanitation No All Town Strategy Compliance Yes Regional Bulk UT Reservoirs Source Development No Reticulation Bulk Pipe Line RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COST SUMMARY Source Development Resource Development Dam No Actual Cost: 16000000 Resource Development River No Feasibility Cost: 0 Resource Development Single Borehole No 5 Year Allocation (2016 - 2020) 0 Resource Development Wellfield No Historical Expenditure 0 Resource Development Spring/Fountain No 2012/13 Expenditure 0 Resource Dev. Rainwater Harvesting No 2013/14 Expenditure 0 Water Conservation & Demand Management Yes 2014/15 Expenditure 0 WCDM SITUATION 2015/16 Expenditure 0 2016/17 Fund Allocations 2017/18 Fund Allocations 2018/19 Fund Allocations 2019/20 Fund Allocations 2020/21 Fund Allocations WCDM Illegal Connections Total Allocation 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Water Wastage Yes Expenditure to Date 0 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Major Leakage Yes Total Expenditure 0 WCDM No Metering Yes Total Funding Deficit 16000000 Total 1617 0 Total 1718 0 Total 1819 0 Total 2019 0 Total 2021 0 Comments: To be implemented in 2015 TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER: MIG New MAIN PROJECT NUMBER: MIG New PROJECT PHASE: 34. 5 PERSPECTIVE Aternative Project Number SUB-PROJECT NUMBER: Water Projects

PROJECT NAME: Upgrading of external bulk water supply PROJECT CATEGORISATION IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Project Main Category: Water DORA Schedule PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Sub Category: Internal Bulk Project Origin: MIG Upgrading and extension of bulk supply lines from reservoir to network in Marydale Accelerated Program PROBLEM DEFINITION Project Weight: 34 Upgrade and extension WSA Project Priority: 0 PROJECT DEFINITION & ADMINISTRATION Province Northern Cape District Municipality: Pixley ka Seme Local Municipality: Siyathemba Water Services Authority Siyathemba Local Municipality Implementing Agent Scheme Number: S03D72A001 Scheme Name: Marydale Contact Person: Mr Johann Badenhorst Contact Number:

MARYDALE INFORMAL A INTERVENTION ACTIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Solution Project Start 2015 Project Type 0 Project Duration 1 NC_Temp124 ACIP New8 Siyathemba Local Municipality Project Extent Project MIG/NC0289/W/09/11 Intervention Horizon Immediate Solution NRC003/8 MIG New MIG New1

DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES PROJECT STATUS M" Infra New Yes Viability Status: Not yet started Infra Replacement No Feasibility Status: Not yet started MARYDALE Infra Extension Yes Impl. Readiness Status: Infra Refurbishment Yes Project Status: Conceptual Infra Upgrade Yes Demand Horizon Year 0 - 5 Design Horizon 20 Year

TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT UT Bulk Pipeline Yes Reticulation Pipeline No Pumpstation No Water Treatment Works No Reservoir or Tank No NUMBER ON MAP: MIG New Power Supply Electricity or Other No Feasibility Study Only No PROPOSED OR CURRENT RESOURCE Legend Operation (O&M) No Main Ground Water Project Sub Category Water Infrastructure Maintenance (O&M) No Augmentary None Basic Supply :9 Water Treatment Works Settlements "M Waste Water Treatment Works No Alternative None Internal Bulk Abstraction Works WSA Boundaries Waterborne Sanitation No All Town Strategy Reference None Planning Ú[ Pumpstations VIP Sanitation No All Town Strategy Compliance Yes Regional Bulk UT Reservoirs Source Development No Reticulation Bulk Pipe Line RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COST SUMMARY Source Development Resource Development Dam No Actual Cost: 1232885 Resource Development River No Feasibility Cost: 0 Resource Development Single Borehole No 5 Year Allocation (2016 - 2020) 0 Resource Development Wellfield No Historical Expenditure 0 Resource Development Spring/Fountain No 2012/13 Expenditure 0 Resource Dev. Rainwater Harvesting No 2013/14 Expenditure 0 Water Conservation & Demand Management Yes 2014/15 Expenditure 0 WCDM SITUATION 2015/16 Expenditure 0 2016/17 Fund Allocations 2017/18 Fund Allocations 2018/19 Fund Allocations 2019/20 Fund Allocations 2020/21 Fund Allocations WCDM Illegal Connections Total Allocation 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Water Wastage Yes Expenditure to Date 0 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Major Leakage Yes Total Expenditure 0 WCDM No Metering No Total Funding Deficit 1232885 Total 1617 0 Total 1718 0 Total 1819 0 Total 2019 0 Total 2021 0 Comments: MIG BP and technical report to be completed and submitted TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER: NC_Temp124 MAIN PROJECT NUMBER: NC_Temp124 PROJECT PHASE: 34. 6 PERSPECTIVE Aternative Project Number SUB-PROJECT NUMBER: Water Projects

PROJECT NAME: Master Plan/Feasibility study for bulk water PROJECT CATEGORISATION IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Project Main Category: Water DORA Schedule PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Sub Category: Regional Bulk Project Origin: RBIG Master Plan/Feasibility study for bulk water Accelerated Program PROBLEM DEFINITION Project Weight: 33 Upgrade and extension WSA Project Priority: 2 PROJECT DEFINITION & ADMINISTRATION WEGDRAAI Sol Plaatjie Local Municipality Province Northern Cape GRIEKWASTAD GRIEKWASTAD INFORMAL C District Municipality: Pixley ka Seme GROBLERSHOOP VOLOP BRANDBOOM Local Municipality: Siyathemba Siyancuma Local Municipality

Water Services Authority Siyathemba Local Municipality DOUGLAS INFORMAL B DOUGLAS BUCKLANDS Implementing Agent BACKHOUSE Scheme Number: S03D72A001 Scheme Name: Siyathemba Contact Person: Mr Johann Badenhorst Kai !Garib Local Municipality Contact Number: M" SALT LAKE KENHARDT INFORMAL A M" NIEKERKSHOOPUTÚ[M"UT KENHARDT M" MARYDALEM" !Kheis Local Municipality UTUT INTERVENTION ACTIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Solution Project Start 2019 " Project Type 0 Project Duration 1 M HOPETOWN Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Local Municipality Project Extent Project ACIP New8 PRIESKAUTUTÚ[M":9UT NC_Temp124 New 18 Intervention Horizon Immediate Solution

DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES PROJECT STATUS Infra New Yes Viability Status: Approved Infra Replacement No Feasibility Status: Completed COPPERTONM" STRYDENBURG Infra Extension No Impl. Readiness Status: Infra Refurbishment No Project Status: Conceptual Hantam Local Municipality Infra Upgrade Yes Demand Horizon Year 0 - 5 M" Design Horizon 20 Year ZWARTKOP

TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT Kareeberg Local Municipality Emthanjeni Local Municipality Bulk Pipeline No

Reticulation Pipeline Yes VANWYKSVLEI Pumpstation No Water Treatment Works No Reservoir or Tank No NUMBER ON MAP: NC_Temp124 Power Supply Electricity or Other No Feasibility Study Only Yes PROPOSED OR CURRENT RESOURCE Legend Operation (O&M) No Main Surface water dam Project Sub Category Water Infrastructure Maintenance (O&M) No Augmentary Ground Water Basic Supply :9 Water Treatment Works Settlements "M Waste Water Treatment Works No Alternative None Internal Bulk Abstraction Works WSA Boundaries Waterborne Sanitation No All Town Strategy Reference None Planning Ú[ Pumpstations VIP Sanitation No All Town Strategy Compliance Yes Regional Bulk UT Reservoirs Source Development No Reticulation Bulk Pipe Line RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COST SUMMARY Source Development Resource Development Dam No Actual Cost: 150000 Resource Development River No Feasibility Cost: 150000 Resource Development Single Borehole No 5 Year Allocation (2016 - 2020) 0 Resource Development Wellfield No Historical Expenditure 0 Resource Development Spring/Fountain No 2012/13 Expenditure 0 Resource Dev. Rainwater Harvesting No 2013/14 Expenditure 0 Water Conservation & Demand Management No 2014/15 Expenditure 0 WCDM SITUATION 2015/16 Expenditure 0 2016/17 Fund Allocations 2017/18 Fund Allocations 2018/19 Fund Allocations 2019/20 Fund Allocations 2020/21 Fund Allocations WCDM Illegal Connections Total Allocation 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Water Wastage Yes Expenditure to Date 0 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Major Leakage No Total Expenditure 0 WCDM No Metering No Total Funding Deficit 150000 Total 1617 0 Total 1718 0 Total 1819 0 Total 2019 0 Total 2021 0 Comments: Completed TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER: MIG New1 MAIN PROJECT NUMBER: MIG New1 PROJECT PHASE: 34. 7 PERSPECTIVE Aternative Project Number SUB-PROJECT NUMBER: Water Projects

PROJECT NAME: Upgrading of internal water supply PROJECT CATEGORISATION IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Project Main Category: Water DORA Schedule PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Sub Category: Basic Supply Project Origin: MIG Upgrading and extension of internal water supply lines in Marydale Accelerated Program PROBLEM DEFINITION Project Weight: 34 Upgrade and extension WSA Project Priority: 0 PROJECT DEFINITION & ADMINISTRATION Province Northern Cape District Municipality: Pixley ka Seme Local Municipality: Siyathemba Water Services Authority Siyathemba Local Municipality Implementing Agent Scheme Number: S03D72A001 Scheme Name: Marydale Contact Person: Mr Johann Badenhorst Contact Number:

TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT UT Bulk Pipeline Yes Reticulation Pipeline Yes Pumpstation No Water Treatment Works No Reservoir or Tank No NUMBER ON MAP: MIG New1 Power Supply Electricity or Other No Feasibility Study Only No PROPOSED OR CURRENT RESOURCE Legend Operation (O&M) No Main Ground Water Project Sub Category Water Infrastructure Maintenance (O&M) No Augmentary None Basic Supply :9 Water Treatment Works Settlements "M Waste Water Treatment Works No Alternative None Internal Bulk Abstraction Works WSA Boundaries Waterborne Sanitation No All Town Strategy Reference None Planning Ú[ Pumpstations VIP Sanitation No All Town Strategy Compliance Yes Regional Bulk UT Reservoirs Source Development No Reticulation Bulk Pipe Line RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COST SUMMARY Source Development Resource Development Dam No Actual Cost: 4229319 Resource Development River No Feasibility Cost: 0 Resource Development Single Borehole No 5 Year Allocation (2016 - 2020) 0 Resource Development Wellfield No Historical Expenditure 0 Resource Development Spring/Fountain No 2012/13 Expenditure 0 Resource Dev. Rainwater Harvesting No 2013/14 Expenditure 0 Water Conservation & Demand Management Yes 2014/15 Expenditure 0 WCDM SITUATION 2015/16 Expenditure 0 2016/17 Fund Allocations 2017/18 Fund Allocations 2018/19 Fund Allocations 2019/20 Fund Allocations 2020/21 Fund Allocations WCDM Illegal Connections Total Allocation 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Water Wastage Yes Expenditure to Date 0 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Major Leakage Yes Total Expenditure 0 WCDM No Metering No Total Funding Deficit 4229319 Total 1617 0 Total 1718 0 Total 1819 0 Total 2019 0 Total 2021 0 Comments: MIG BP and technical report to be completed and submitted TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER: MIG/NC0562/W/15/17 MAIN PROJECT NUMBER: MIG/NC0562/W/15/17 PROJECT PHASE: 34. 8 PERSPECTIVE Aternative Project Number SUB-PROJECT NUMBER: Water Projects

PROJECT NAME: MIG 1331: Prieska Bulk Water Supply PROJECT CATEGORISATION IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Project Main Category: Water DORA Schedule PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Sub Category: Regional Bulk Project Origin: MIG MIG 1331: Prieska Bulk Water Supply Accelerated Program PROBLEM DEFINITION Project Weight: 0 WSA Project Priority: 0 PROJECT DEFINITION & ADMINISTRATION Province Northern Cape District Municipality: Pixley ka Seme Local Municipality: Siyathemba Water Services Authority Siyathemba Local Municipality Implementing Agent Scheme Number: Scheme Name: Contact Person: Contact Number:

M" Ú[ INTERVENTION ACTIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT MIG/NC0562/W/15/17 PRIESKA Project Solution Project Start 2016 New 18 Project Type 0 Project Duration 0 NC_Temp124 ACIP New8 Siyathemba Local Municipality UT UT Project Extent UT Intervention Horizon

DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES PROJECT STATUS UT Infra New N/A Viability Status: Infra Replacement N/A Feasibility Status: Infra Extension N/A Impl. Readiness Status: Infra Refurbishment N/A Project Status: Tender Infra Upgrade N/A Demand Horizon Design Horizon

TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT Bulk Pipeline N/A Reticulation Pipeline N/A Pumpstation N/A Water Treatment Works N/A Reservoir or Tank N/A NUMBER ON MAP: MIG/NC0562/W/15/17 Power Supply Electricity or Other N/A Feasibility Study Only N/A PROPOSED OR CURRENT RESOURCE Legend Operation (O&M) N/A Main Project Sub Category Water Infrastructure Maintenance (O&M) N/A Augmentary Basic Supply :9 Water Treatment Works Settlements "M Waste Water Treatment Works N/A Alternative Internal Bulk Abstraction Works WSA Boundaries Waterborne Sanitation N/A All Town Strategy Reference Planning Ú[ Pumpstations VIP Sanitation N/A All Town Strategy Compliance Regional Bulk UT Reservoirs Source Development N/A Reticulation Bulk Pipe Line RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COST SUMMARY Source Development Resource Development Dam N/A Actual Cost: 32456512,95 Resource Development River N/A Feasibility Cost: 0 Resource Development Single Borehole N/A 5 Year Allocation (2016 - 2020) 16193198,34 Resource Development Wellfield N/A Historical Expenditure 0 Resource Development Spring/Fountain N/A 2012/13 Expenditure 0 Resource Dev. Rainwater Harvesting N/A 2013/14 Expenditure 0 Water Conservation & Demand Management N/A 2014/15 Expenditure 0 WCDM SITUATION 2015/16 Expenditure 0 2016/17 Fund Allocations 2017/18 Fund Allocations 2018/19 Fund Allocations 2019/20 Fund Allocations 2020/21 Fund Allocations WCDM Illegal Connections N/A Total Allocation 16193198,34 MIG 750000 0 0 0 0 WCDM Water Wastage N/A Expenditure to Date 1513804,27 Other 15443198,34 0 0 0 0 WCDM Major Leakage N/A Total Expenditure 1513804,27 WCDM No Metering N/A Total Funding Deficit 16263314,61 Total 1617 16193198,34 Total 1718 0 Total 1819 0 Total 2019 0 Total 2021 0 Comments: TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER: New8 MAIN PROJECT NUMBER: New8 PROJECT PHASE: 35. 1 PERSPECTIVE Aternative Project Number SUB-PROJECT NUMBER: Sanitation Projects

PROJECT NAME: Upgrading of Oxidation ponds in Marydale PROJECT CATEGORISATION IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Project Main Category: Sanitation DORA Schedule PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Sub Category: Sanitation Bulk Project Origin: MIG Upgrading and extension of Oxidation ponds in Marydale Accelerated Program PROBLEM DEFINITION Project Weight: 37 Upgrade and extension WSA Project Priority: 0 PROJECT DEFINITION & ADMINISTRATION Province Northern Cape District Municipality: Pixley ka Seme Local Municipality: Siyathemba Water Services Authority Siyathemba Local Municipality Implementing Agent Scheme Number: S03D72C001 Q3 Scheme Name: Marydale Contact Person: Mr Johann Badenhorst Contact Number:

MARYDALE INFORMAL A INTERVENTION ACTIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Solution Project Start 2013 Project Type 0 Project Duration 1 MIG New2 Siyathemba Local Municipality Project Extent Project Intervention Horizon Immediate Solution New8 MIG/NC0561/S/15/16 DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES PROJECT STATUS Infra New Yes Viability Status: In Process Infra Replacement No Feasibility Status: Completed MARYDALE Infra Extension Yes Impl. Readiness Status: Infra Refurbishment No Project Status: Construction Infra Upgrade Yes Demand Horizon Year 0 - 5 Design Horizon 20 Year

TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT Bulk Pipeline No Reticulation Pipeline No Pumpstation No Water Treatment Works No Reservoir or Tank No NUMBER ON MAP: New8 Power Supply Electricity or Other No Feasibility Study Only No PROPOSED OR CURRENT RESOURCE Legend Operation (O&M) Main Ground Water No Project Sub Category Sanitation Infrastructure Maintenance (O&M) No Augmentary None Basic Sanitation; Basic Supply Q3 Waste Water Treatment Settlements Waste Water Treatment Works Yes Alternative None Internal Sanitation :9 SewerPumpstations WSA Boundaries Waterborne Sanitation No All Town Strategy Reference None Planning VIP Sanitation No All Town Strategy Compliance Yes Bulk Pipe Line Sanitation Bulk Source Development No RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COST SUMMARY Resource Development Dam No Actual Cost: 6882050 Resource Development River No Feasibility Cost: 0 Resource Development Single Borehole No 5 Year Allocation (2016 - 2020) 0 Resource Development Wellfield No Historical Expenditure 0 Resource Development Spring/Fountain No 2012/13 Expenditure 5808450 Resource Dev. Rainwater Harvesting No 2013/14 Expenditure 1073600 Water Conservation & Demand Management No 2014/15 Expenditure 0 WCDM SITUATION 2015/16 Expenditure 0 2016/17 Fund Allocations 2017/18 Fund Allocations 2018/19 Fund Allocations 2019/20 Fund Allocations 2020/21 Fund Allocations WCDM Illegal Connections Total Allocation 6882050 No 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Water Wastage No Expenditure to Date 0 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Major Leakage No Total Expenditure 6882050 WCDM No Metering No Total Funding Deficit 0 Total 1617 0 Total 1718 0 Total 1819 0 Total 2019 0 Total 2021 0 Comments: Construction 75% completed. Project will be completed in June 2014 TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER: MIG/NC0283/S/09/11 MAIN PROJECT NUMBER: MIG/NC0283/S/09/11 PROJECT PHASE: 35. 2 PERSPECTIVE Aternative Project Number SUB-PROJECT NUMBER: Sanitation Projects

PROJECT NAME: Installation of full waterborne sanitation systems at Prieska [310 sites] PROJECT CATEGORISATION IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Project Main Category: Sanitation DORA Schedule PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Sub Category: Sanitation Bulk Project Origin: MIG Upgrading of VIP toilets to full waterborn systems Accelerated Program PROBLEM DEFINITION Project Weight: 28 Upgrade and extension WSA Project Priority: 0 PROJECT DEFINITION & ADMINISTRATION Province Northern Cape District Municipality: Pixley ka Seme Local Municipality: Siyathemba Water Services Authority Siyathemba Local Municipality Implementing Agent Scheme Number: S03D72A001 Scheme Name: Prieska Contact Person: Mr Johann Badenhorst Contact Number:

INTERVENTION ACTIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Project Solution Project Start 2013 PRIESKA Q3 Project Type 0 Project Duration 1 MIG New2 Siyathemba Local Municipality Project Extent Project

Intervention Horizon Immediate Solution MIG/NC0283/S/09/11 ACIP New7 DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES PROJECT STATUS Infra New Yes Viability Status: In Process Infra Replacement Yes Feasibility Status: Not yet started Infra Extension No Impl. Readiness Status: Infra Refurbishment Yes Project Status: Awaiting Funding Infra Upgrade Yes Demand Horizon Year 0 - 5 Design Horizon 20 Year

TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT Bulk Pipeline No Reticulation Pipeline No Pumpstation No Water Treatment Works No Reservoir or Tank No NUMBER ON MAP: MIG/NC0283/S/09/11 Power Supply Electricity or Other No Feasibility Study Only No PROPOSED OR CURRENT RESOURCE Legend Operation (O&M) Main Surface water dam No Project Sub Category Sanitation Infrastructure Maintenance (O&M) No Augmentary Ground Water Basic Sanitation; Basic Supply Q3 Waste Water Treatment Settlements Waste Water Treatment Works No Alternative None Internal Sanitation :9 SewerPumpstations WSA Boundaries Waterborne Sanitation Yes All Town Strategy Reference None Planning VIP Sanitation No All Town Strategy Compliance Yes Bulk Pipe Line Sanitation Bulk Source Development No RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COST SUMMARY Resource Development Dam No Actual Cost: 25251000 Resource Development River No Feasibility Cost: 0 Resource Development Single Borehole No 5 Year Allocation (2016 - 2020) 0 Resource Development Wellfield No Historical Expenditure 0 Resource Development Spring/Fountain No 2012/13 Expenditure 0 Resource Dev. Rainwater Harvesting No 2013/14 Expenditure 0 Water Conservation & Demand Management No 2014/15 Expenditure 0 WCDM SITUATION 2015/16 Expenditure 0 2016/17 Fund Allocations 2017/18 Fund Allocations 2018/19 Fund Allocations 2019/20 Fund Allocations 2020/21 Fund Allocations WCDM Illegal Connections Total Allocation 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Water Wastage No Expenditure to Date 0 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Major Leakage No Total Expenditure 0 WCDM No Metering No Total Funding Deficit 25251000 Total 1617 0 Total 1718 0 Total 1819 0 Total 2019 0 Total 2021 0 Comments: To be implemented in 2015 TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER: ACIP New7 MAIN PROJECT NUMBER: ACIP New7 PROJECT PHASE: 35. 3 PERSPECTIVE Aternative Project Number SUB-PROJECT NUMBER: Sanitation Projects

PROJECT NAME: Upgrading of WWTW PROJECT CATEGORISATION IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Project Main Category: Sanitation DORA Schedule PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Sub Category: Internal Sanitation Project Origin: ACIP Upgrading and installation of sludge pump at WWTW and replacement of 1 sewer truck Accelerated Program PROBLEM DEFINITION Project Weight: 38 Upgrade and extension WSA Project Priority: 0 PROJECT DEFINITION & ADMINISTRATION Province Northern Cape District Municipality: Pixley ka Seme Local Municipality: Siyathemba Water Services Authority Siyathemba Local Municipality Implementing Agent Scheme Number: S03D72A001 Scheme Name: Prieska Contact Person: Mr Johann Badenhorst Contact Number:

INTERVENTION ACTIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Project Solution Project Start 2015 PRIESKA Q3 Project Type 0 Project Duration 1 MIG New2 Siyathemba Local Municipality Project Extent Project

Intervention Horizon Immediate Solution MIG/NC0283/S/09/11 ACIP New7 DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES PROJECT STATUS Infra New No Viability Status: Not yet started Infra Replacement No Feasibility Status: Not yet started Infra Extension No Impl. Readiness Status: Infra Refurbishment No Project Status: Conceptual Infra Upgrade Yes Demand Horizon Year 0 - 5 Design Horizon 20 Year

TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT Bulk Pipeline No Reticulation Pipeline No Pumpstation Yes Water Treatment Works No Reservoir or Tank No NUMBER ON MAP: ACIP New7 Power Supply Electricity or Other Yes Feasibility Study Only No PROPOSED OR CURRENT RESOURCE Legend Operation (O&M) Main Surface water dam No Project Sub Category Sanitation Infrastructure Maintenance (O&M) No Augmentary Ground Water Basic Sanitation; Basic Supply Q3 Waste Water Treatment Settlements Waste Water Treatment Works No Alternative None Internal Sanitation :9 SewerPumpstations WSA Boundaries Waterborne Sanitation No All Town Strategy Reference None Planning VIP Sanitation No All Town Strategy Compliance Yes Bulk Pipe Line Sanitation Bulk Source Development No RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COST SUMMARY Resource Development Dam No Actual Cost: 1600000 Resource Development River No Feasibility Cost: 0 Resource Development Single Borehole No 5 Year Allocation (2016 - 2020) 0 Resource Development Wellfield No Historical Expenditure 0 Resource Development Spring/Fountain No 2012/13 Expenditure 0 Resource Dev. Rainwater Harvesting No 2013/14 Expenditure 0 Water Conservation & Demand Management No 2014/15 Expenditure 0 WCDM SITUATION 2015/16 Expenditure 0 2016/17 Fund Allocations 2017/18 Fund Allocations 2018/19 Fund Allocations 2019/20 Fund Allocations 2020/21 Fund Allocations WCDM Illegal Connections Total Allocation 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Water Wastage No Expenditure to Date 0 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Major Leakage No Total Expenditure 0 WCDM No Metering No Total Funding Deficit 1600000 Total 1617 0 Total 1718 0 Total 1819 0 Total 2019 0 Total 2021 0 Comments: ACIP BP to be completed and submitted TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER: MIG New2 MAIN PROJECT NUMBER: MIG New2 PROJECT PHASE: 35. 4 PERSPECTIVE Aternative Project Number SUB-PROJECT NUMBER: Sanitation Projects

PROJECT NAME: Bucket eradication in Siyathemba PROJECT CATEGORISATION IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Project Main Category: Sanitation DORA Schedule PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Sub Category: Internal Sanitation Project Origin: MIG Replacement of 158 VIP's in Prieska to water borne sanitation, 190 VIP's in Marydale to concervancy tanks, replace 260 buckets to concervancy tanks and 350 VIP's to concervancy tanks Accelerated Program PROBLEM DEFINITION Project Weight: 34 Upgrade and extension WSA Project Priority: 0 PROJECT DEFINITION & ADMINISTRATION WEGDRAAI Sol Plaatjie Local Municipality Province Northern Cape GRIEKWASTAD GRIEKWASTAD INFORMAL C District Municipality: Pixley ka Seme GROBLERSHOOP VOLOP BRANDBOOM Local Municipality: Siyathemba Siyancuma Local Municipality

Project Type 0 Project Duration 1 HOPETOWN Siyathemba Local Municipality Thembelihle Local Municipality Project Extent Project MIG New2 PRIESKAQ3 ACIP New7 Intervention Horizon Immediate Solution MIG/NC0283/S/09/11

DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES PROJECT STATUS Infra New Yes Viability Status: Not yet started Not yet started Infra Replacement Yes Feasibility Status: COPPERTON STRYDENBURG Infra Extension Yes Impl. Readiness Status: Infra Refurbishment Yes Project Status: Awaiting Funding Hantam Local Municipality Infra Upgrade Yes Demand Horizon Year 0 - 5

Design Horizon 20 Year ZWARTKOP

TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT Kareeberg Local Municipality Emthanjeni Local Municipality Bulk Pipeline No

Reticulation Pipeline No VANWYKSVLEI Pumpstation Yes Water Treatment Works No Reservoir or Tank No NUMBER ON MAP: MIG New2 Power Supply Electricity or Other No Feasibility Study Only No PROPOSED OR CURRENT RESOURCE Legend Operation (O&M) Main Surface water dam No Project Sub Category Sanitation Infrastructure Maintenance (O&M) No Augmentary Ground Water Basic Sanitation; Basic Supply Q3 Waste Water Treatment Settlements Waste Water Treatment Works No Alternative None Internal Sanitation :9 SewerPumpstations WSA Boundaries Waterborne Sanitation Yes All Town Strategy Reference None Planning VIP Sanitation No All Town Strategy Compliance Yes Bulk Pipe Line Sanitation Bulk Source Development No RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COST SUMMARY Resource Development Dam No Actual Cost: 7637300 Resource Development River No Feasibility Cost: 0 Resource Development Single Borehole No 5 Year Allocation (2016 - 2020) 0 Resource Development Wellfield No Historical Expenditure 0 Resource Development Spring/Fountain No 2012/13 Expenditure 0 Resource Dev. Rainwater Harvesting No 2013/14 Expenditure 0 Water Conservation & Demand Management No 2014/15 Expenditure 0 WCDM SITUATION 2015/16 Expenditure 0 2016/17 Fund Allocations 2017/18 Fund Allocations 2018/19 Fund Allocations 2019/20 Fund Allocations 2020/21 Fund Allocations WCDM Illegal Connections Total Allocation 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Water Wastage No Expenditure to Date 0 0 0 0 0 0 WCDM Major Leakage No Total Expenditure 0 WCDM No Metering No Total Funding Deficit 7637300 Total 1617 0 Total 1718 0 Total 1819 0 Total 2019 0 Total 2021 0 Comments: MIG BP and technical report to be completed and submitted TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECT NUMBER: MIG/NC0561/S/15/16 MAIN PROJECT NUMBER: MIG/NC0561/S/15/16 PROJECT PHASE: 35. 5 PERSPECTIVE Aternative Project Number SUB-PROJECT NUMBER: Sanitation Projects

PROJECT NAME: MIG 1327: Siyathemba:Marydale:Bulk sewerage line,pump station & raising main PROJECT CATEGORISATION IMPLEMENTATION DRIVERS Project Main Category: Sanitation DORA Schedule PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Sub Category: Sanitation Bulk Project Origin: MIG MIG 1327: Siyathemba:Marydale:Bulk sewerage line,pump station & raising main Accelerated Program PROBLEM DEFINITION Project Weight: 0 WSA Project Priority: 0 PROJECT DEFINITION & ADMINISTRATION Province Northern Cape Q3 District Municipality: Pixley ka Seme Local Municipality: Siyathemba Water Services Authority Siyathemba Local Municipality Implementing Agent Scheme Number: Scheme Name: Contact Person: MARYDALE INFORMAL A Contact Number:

INTERVENTION ACTIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT Project Solution Functionality Project Start 2016 New8 Project Type 9 Project Duration 0 MIG New2 MIG/NC0561/S/15/16 Siyathemba Local Municipality Project Extent Intervention Horizon MARYDALE DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES PROJECT STATUS Infra New N/A Viability Status: Infra Replacement N/A Feasibility Status: Infra Extension N/A Impl. Readiness Status: Infra Refurbishment N/A Project Status: Construction Infra Upgrade N/A Demand Horizon Design Horizon

TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT Bulk Pipeline N/A Reticulation Pipeline N/A Pumpstation N/A Water Treatment Works N/A Reservoir or Tank N/A NUMBER ON MAP: MIG/NC0561/S/15/16 Power Supply Electricity or Other N/A Feasibility Study Only N/A PROPOSED OR CURRENT RESOURCE Legend Operation (O&M) Main N/A Project Sub Category Sanitation Infrastructure Maintenance (O&M) N/A Augmentary Basic Sanitation; Basic Supply Q3 Waste Water Treatment Settlements Waste Water Treatment Works Yes Alternative Internal Sanitation :9 SewerPumpstations WSA Boundaries Waterborne Sanitation N/A All Town Strategy Reference Planning VIP Sanitation N/A All Town Strategy Compliance Bulk Pipe Line Sanitation Bulk Source Development N/A RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COST SUMMARY Resource Development Dam N/A Actual Cost: 8336414 Resource Development River N/A Feasibility Cost: 0 Resource Development Single Borehole N/A 5 Year Allocation (2016 - 2020) 4499214 Resource Development Wellfield N/A Historical Expenditure 0 Resource Development Spring/Fountain N/A 2012/13 Expenditure 0 Resource Dev. Rainwater Harvesting N/A 2013/14 Expenditure 0 Water Conservation & Demand Management N/A 2014/15 Expenditure 0 WCDM SITUATION 2015/16 Expenditure 0 2016/17 Fund Allocations 2017/18 Fund Allocations 2018/19 Fund Allocations 2019/20 Fund Allocations 2020/21 Fund Allocations WCDM Illegal Connections N/A Total Allocation 4499214 MIG 3336414 0 0 0 0 WCDM Water Wastage N/A Expenditure to Date 338457,34 Other 1162800 0 0 0 0 WCDM Major Leakage N/A Total Expenditure 338457,34 WCDM No Metering N/A Total Funding Deficit 3837200 Total 1617 4499214 Total 1718 0 Total 1819 0 Total 2019 0 Total 2021 0 Comments: