DOCSLIB.ORG

Quarterly Update December 31, 2013 Issue 20 Special Interview 9 Governance Meetings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quarterly Update December 31, 2013 Issue 20 Special Interview 9 Governance Meetings Quarterly Update December 31, 2013 Issue 20 Special Interview 9 Governance Meetings 9th Executive Board Meeting, Washington, DC (October 30, 2013) 9th ICP Executive Board Meeting sults with a special emphasis on the economic and 2011 ICP results. consistency of the results of the largest econo- The 9th meeting of the ICP 2011 Executive Special Task Force Meeting mies. Board took place on October 30, 2013, in The Special Task Force, created by the ICP Washington, DC to address the critical stage Results Review Group Meeting Executive Board, met from November 21-22, of finalizing the computation process and The Results Review Group, made up of sev- 2013 in Washington, DC to discuss and thor- publishing results. Meeting discussions relat- eral prominent Technical Advisory Group oughly review the quality assurance issues ed to the ICP 2011 progress report; communi- experts, was formed to provide adept review surrounding the results of economically large cation strategy; revision policy; and evalua- of the ICP 2011 results and to ensure the countries. Specifically, the meeting focused tion of the ICP 2011 round. highest quality is achieved. The experts of the on item representativity, the treatment of The Board stressed the critical stage of re- Results Review Group met on November 19, outliers, as well as housing and construction viewing estimates and finalizing the computa- 2013 in Washington, DC. approaches. tion process. Preliminary results were com- The meeting was attended by the World Bank PPP Computation Task Force Meeting puted by the PPP Computation Task Force Senior Vice President and Chief Economist. through parallel and independent processes. The PPP Computation Task Force met in The meeting specifically covered poverty The metadata underlying all computation Washington, DC from December 2-3, 2013 to issues arising from the current set of prelimi- steps is being documented for transparency ensure that their parallel and independent nary results; the comparison of 2011 bench- purposes. processes of global computation converged to mark results with 2011 extrapolated PPPs and the same results. They thus harmonized their For quality assurance, the Board formed a volume measures in the World Development approaches and methods and reviewed the Special Task Force to review the global re- Indicators; and the consistency between 2005 preliminary results generated through the fourth round of computation of results. The sessions were productive and led to an agree- ment on detailed guidelines for the subse- quent rounds of computation and a strict time- table to produce the results. ICP Blogs Updates including the upcoming release of the ICP 2011 results, as well as information on updating the PPP time series published in the World Development Indicators will be provided via the Open Data blog website http://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata. Special Task Force Meeting, Washington, DC (November 21-22, 2013) ICP Quarterly Update — December 31, 2013 — Issue No 20 Page 2 Special Interview with Alan Heston, professor emeritus in the Department of Economics at the University of Pennsylvania Q1. Considering the evolution of the ICP, Linking issues include choices of comparable which you have witnessed firsthand since items to price across some or all countries in the ICP’s first year in 1968, do you find the different regions. Before 1980, all country methodological improvements to be head- price data were at the Global Office (at the ing in the right direction? UNSO or Penn University) and were checked in one place. The cost of this was that often it The broad framework of the ICP that was was not feasible to interact with countries on formulated around 1960 by Irving Kravis and whether their submitted prices matched prod- Milton Gilbert for binary comparisons in the uct descriptions that were often too generic. OEEC (predecessor of the OECD) has been In contrast to earlier ICPs, growth of the in- retained. An important component of their Professor Heston at the WSS Seminar, ternet and the face-to-face validation within work was to estimate PPPs from the expendi- Washington, DC (November 6, 2013) regions have very much improved the price ture side of national accounts. A major expan- comparisons. In 2005, a set of 18 ring coun- so that the ICP benchmarks and the ex- sion of their vision was to develop a multilat- tries were used to link the regions analogous trapolation of PPPs could be more con- eral framework by modifying the Geary pro- to what was available to link regions in 1980. sistent? posal for cross-country agricultural price Because of questions raised by the 2005 link- indexes as supplemented by Salem Khamis. At this stage two changes, both of which have ing through Ring countries, the approach in The appeal of this Geary-Khamis aggregation been developed by the EU, can be made to 2011 was to use a core price list from which technique was its additivity across time and improve extrapolations between benchmark all countries would price as many items as space at a time when non-additive indexes ICP results. The first is to carry out extrapola- were available in their country. It is too early were less commonly used. Other non-additive tions at the most detailed level provided by to assess the overall success of the core list aggregations were also reported in early ICPs countries for their time to time price indexes. approach. What is clear is the heterogeneity and were regularly used later in the EU and The second is to reduce the time between within and across regions will continue to OECD. benchmark comparisons by undertaking some pose issues for future ICPs. new surveys each year if possible, or finding An important change in the ICP was moving It has been recognized from the inception of readily available prices that allow for some to a regional organization of the comparisons the ICP that the conversion of net exports by updating of PPPs, perhaps for summary ex- in the 1980 ICP. This has posed many meth- the exchange rate is an ad-hoc procedure penditure headings. odological problems that are gradually being adopted mainly because it is a major task to resolved. The biggest improvement in the ICP The easiest improvement in extrapolation of estimate PPPs for exports and imports. As has been in the methods and quality of price GDPs is to add together separate updates of world trade has grown along with the number comparison and validation occurring at the domestic absorption and exports and imports. of participating countries where exports plus regional and global level. In terms of aggrega- This is especially important because simple imports in relation to GDP exceeds 50%, it is tion, moving to other methods like GEKS extrapolation at the GDP level ignores chang- more pressing to find a better method of han- (Gini, Eltetö, Köves, and Szulc) have been es in the terms of trade that for some coun- dling trade. useful, particularly in linking the regions. In tries is very large even from year to year. the 1980 ICP a method was developed to Estimation of PPPs from the production side Q4. What is it about PPPs that make you aggregate to world GDP that could be in turn of GDP is more difficult than from the ex- happy to work on the topic? As one of the divided between the regions, and further allo- penditure side because one needs prices or "fathers" of PPPs, how would you define cated to countries within a region to preserve unit values for both finished goods and raw your legacy? ‘fixity’ of regional relationships. This is the materials and other inputs. The cost of not CAR method that is being used in the 2011 including the production side is that compari- The UK made in kind contributions to the ICP. sons of productivity by sector are not possible 1975 ICP in the form of the time of retired unless very questionable assumptions are statisticians. One of these was Angus Fell When the ICP was initiated, several of the made about mapping expenditure PPPs to who by chance I had met 15 years earlier in a initial ten participating countries did not have PPPs for productive sectors. Even expanding Bombay bar on route to assist in the tabula- detailed breakdowns of GDP from the ex- price collection within the present ICP frame- tion of the Malayan census. I met Angus penditure side and this early attempt to im- work to a number of raw materials, chemi- again in the 1980s in Hong Kong where I was prove the national accounts has increasingly cals, and the like would be helpful. These visiting the statistical office and he was a become a focus of subsequent ICP rounds. additional prices when combined with the consultant. After work in a pub, Angus asked The ICP has been important agent in helping many construction items and wage data al- me what was the latest with the Mighty Gen- countries move their national accounts from ready collected by the ICP would provide a ghis Khan method, which, after initial sur- the 1968 to the 1993 SNA. rough basis for providing PPPs for many prise, realized this was his term for the Geary- Q2. What do you propose should be done productive sectors. Khamis method. I looked at him and asked to further improve the ICP going forward, whether when I was retired 15 years I would Q3. As one of the founders of the Penn especially regarding the consistency be- still be thinking about ICP problems. He took World tables, what would you recommend tween results of two different benchmarks? another drink and just smiled and his smile ICP Quarterly Update — December 31, 2013 — Issue No 20 Page 3 Special Interview cont’d told it all in terms of whatever it is that keeps one involved with ICP type problems.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Measuring and Interpreting World Economic Performance 1500-2001
    Measuring and Interpreting World Economic Performance 1500-2001 By Angus Maddison © Macro-measurement started in the seventeenth century, but did not emerge as a basic analytical tool for policy analysts and economic historians until the 1940s. In the past 60 years there has been an explosion in the sophistication of policy analysis and the interpretation of history. The explosion started in 1940 with two seminal works: Keynes’ How to Pay for the War which demonstrated its usefulness as a tool of macroeconomic management, and Colin Clark’s Conditions of Economic Progress which demonstrated its value in interpreting economic history. Dissemination and development of techniques of macro-measurement was a major objective of the founding fathers of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth (IARIW). The initiative came from Simon Kuznets (1901-85), the pioneer of quantitative economic history. Milton Gilbert (1909-79) and Richard Stone (1913-1991) were strategic partners with enormous international leverage in creating and diffusing standard procedures for construction of comparable national accounts by official statistical offices. In the past half-century, I have followed the Kuznetsian approach, augmenting the historical accounts and broadening their geographic scope with my own research, using it to interpret economic performance with a similar analytical toolkit and the same emphasis on transparent description of source material, encouraging graduate students to follow the same path, and creating networks of scholars active in this brand of quantitative economic history. Now we have fairly comprehensive coverage for the whole of the capitalist epoch from 1820 onwards. There are of course gaps in the evidence and scope for improving its quality, but the new challenge, which I have taken up in recent years, is to push the quantitative record further back in time.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Oecd-Eurostat Ppp Program
    REVIEW OF THE OECD-EUROSTAT PPP PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE KEY CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................. 2 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2. International Volume and Price Comparisons: Needs v. Resources....................................................... 4 3. Reporting of PPP Program Results in OECD Publications..................................................................... 8 (a) National Accounts: Main Aggregates.................................................................................................... 9 (b) Main Economic Indicators .................................................................................................................. 10 (c) OECD Press Release, 19 January 1995 .............................................................................................. 10 (d) OECD in Figures: Statistics on the Member Countries ..................................................................... 11 (e) Communications Outlook .................................................................................................................... 11 4. Expenditure in PPP Dollars v. Real Expenditures ................................................................................ 12 5. PPPs and the National Accounts .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (ICP) and the Penn World Table (PWT
    1/4/2017 A Memoir of My Work with the International Comparison Program (ICP) and the Penn World Table (PWT Alan Heston* Preface Chapter 1: Phase 1: Antecedents and Early Meetings Background of the ICP A. ICP Predecessors (1) Before Colin Clark’s 1940 The Conditions of Economic Progress (2) The period 1940-65 (3) Early Methods of Comparing PPP B. Phase I of the ICP: 1968-70 (1) Some Early Decisions on the Framework of the ICP Comparisons (2) New Bolton Meeting, June 1969 (3) Bellagio I, October 1969 Chapter 2: Organization and Implementation of ICP Phase I A. Phase I Activity 1970-71 (1) Division of Labor with the UNSO (2) Robert Summers on Board in 1970 (3) Gathering and Processing Prices and Expenditures: 1970-71 (4) Extended Visit to India and Short Visit to Japan (5) Obtaining US Expenditures and Prices (6) Equipment Goods (7) Construction B. Experimenting with Aggregation Methods on Preliminary Data: 1972-4 (1) Below the Basic Heading Level (2) Aggregating the Basic Heading PPPs: GEKS and Geary-Khamis (3) To Obtain More Support You Need to Show Results (4) A digression on Men of Affairs (5) Organization of Phase II and Completion of Phase: SOEC (6) The Rest of the ICP World (7) A Digression on the 1967 Comparison Chapter 3: Responses to the Phase I Report A. Response of Reviewers. Scholars and the Media (1) Book Reviews (2) The Media B. Response of the International Organizations 1 (1) The World Bank (2) The European Union (3) The International Monetary Fund (4) The Regional Banks and Economic Commissions of UN System Chapter 4: Completion of the Phase II Report A.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction To" International and Interarea Comparisons of Income
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: International and Interarea Comparisons of Income, Output, and Prices Volume Author/Editor: Alan Heston and Robert E. Lipsey, editors Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-33110-5 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/hest99-1 Publication Date: January 1999 Chapter Title: Introduction to "International and Interarea Comparisons of Income, Output, and Prices" Chapter Author: Alan Heston, Robert E. Lipsey Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c8384 Chapter pages in book: (p. 1 - 9) Introduction Alan Heston and Robert E. Lipsey Comparisons across countries of prices and of income and output measured in real terms, and comparisons within countries across regions and cities, are an old ambition of economists. The appetite for cross-country comparisons has been attested to by the hundreds of citations of the estimates of real income and prices for many countries constructed by Alan Heston and Robert Sum- mers, now known as the Penn World Tables. Almost the entire recent literature on the determinants of economic growth that covers large numbers of countries is dependent on these data. The Penn World Tables are derived from the UN International Comparison Program (ICP), but few of those who use them know their origin or ever examine the methods underlying the original expenditure and price measures. In organizing this conference, we intended to make the ICP more widely known in the profession; to discuss its problems and new developments, including its extension to the transition economies; to discuss the analogous issues in interarea comparisons; and to illustrate a few of the uses of international and interarea comparisons.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    FILE COPY A Survey and Critique of World Bank Supported Research on International Comparisons of Real Product Public Disclosure Authorized SWP365 World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 365 P.C.C. 1 December 1979 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by: Robin Marris (Consultant) Economic Analysis & Projections Department Copyright ( 1979 The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W. Public Disclosure Authorized Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. The views and interpretations in this document are those of the author and should not be attributed to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to any individual acting in their behalf. Che views and interpretations in this document are those of the author and should not be attributed to the World Bank, to its iffiliated organizations or to any individual acting in their behalf. WORLD BANK Staff Working Paper No.365 December 1979 A SURVEY ANID CRITIQUE OF WORLD BANK SUPPORTED RESEARCH'ON INTERNATIONAL COHPARISONS OF REAL PRODUCT This paper describes the nature and content of the statistical data generated by the project on International Comparisons of Real Product (ICP). It analyzes their theoretical implications, investigates more generally the problems of international comparisons of economic welfare, discusses and criticizes the methods used by the ICP to compare internationally expendi- ture in the services sectors, reconsiders the applied theory of the rela- tionship between price-structure, economic development and purchasing power exchange rates. Prepared by: Robin
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Guus Wieman
    Before GNP: The debate that shaped the most important national statistic of the 20th century Guus Wieman, 3795780 Supervisior: Prof. Jan Luiten van Zanden. Before GNP !2 Abstract Gross National Product (GNP), it is one of the most common abbreviations in economics and has become a mainstay in discussions of political economics. Gross National Product is the means by which we measure national income. It is an aggregate statistic that represents the value of national production and has become one of the primary indicators of the development of a national economy. As much as it is present in contemporary economics and political economics, the definition and method of compiling national income and GDP are only 70 years old making it a fairly modern construct. In recent years, GNP has become one of the most criticised statistical figures in contemporary society and we can wonder to what extent the criticisms towards GNP today were already familiar to the people who inverted and standardised the concept. This thesis sets out to look at GNP and national income from a historical perspective prior to the standardisation of these concepts. It will discuss the debate between three of the most prominent scholars in the field of national income between the 1930s and 1950s: Simon Kuznets, Richard Stone and Milton Gilbert, about the definitions of national income and the method of national accounting. In doing so it seeks find out how the standardised definitions and concepts for the measurement of Gross National Product and national income came about? Before GNP !3 Preface Seeing the daylight again after being buried under a pile of paper for 5 months, forces me to reminisce on why I bothered tackling the subject of national income in the first place.
    [Show full text]
  • Imes Discussion Paper Series
    IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES WHATEVER HAPPENED TO PRODUCTIVITY INVESTMENT AND GROWTH IN THE G-7? Dale W. JORGENSON and Eric YIP Discussion Paper No. 99-E-11 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN C.P.O BOX 203 TOKYO 100-8630 JAPAN NOTE: IMES Discussion Paper Series is circulated in order to stimulate discussion and comments. Views expressed in Discussion Paper Series are those of authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Bank of Japan or the Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies. IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-E-11 May 1999 WHATEVER HAPPENED TO PRODUCTIVITY INVESTMENT AND GROWTH IN THE G-7? Dale W. JORGENSON* and Eric YIP** Abstract In this paper we present international comparisons of patterns of economic growth among the G-7 countries over the period 1960-1995. We can rationalize the important changes in economic performance that have taken place among the G-7 countries on the basis of Robert Solow’s neoclassical theory of economic growth. In Section 2 we describe the methodology for allocating the sources of economic growth between investment and productivity. In Section 3 we analyze the role of investment and productivity as sources of growth in the G-7 countries over the 1960-1995. In Section 4 we test the important implication of the neoclassical theory of growth that relative levels of output and input per capita must converge over time. In Section 5 we summarize the conclusions of our study and outline alternative approaches to endogenous growth through broadening the concept of investment. The mechanism for endogenous accumulation of tangible assets captured in Solow’s theory provides the most appropriate point of departure.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruggles Lecture, IARIW 28Th General Conference, Cork, Ireland August 2004 Contours of the World Economy and the Art of Macro-Mea
    Ruggles Lecture, IARIW 28th General Conference, Cork, Ireland August 2004 Contours of the World Economy and the Art of Macro-measurement 1500-2001 Angus Maddison The Ruggles lecture is a suitable occasion for surveying the progress achieved, in the past 60 years, in quantifying world economic development, and analysing the causal influences which determine the pace and pattern of growth. This was a major objective of the founding fathers and leading activists in the first phase (1949-63) of IARIW’s existence. The initiative for creating an association including both academics and official statisticians came from Simon Kuznets (1901-85), the pioneer of quantitative economic history, who had played both roles himself and had created a US association on the same lines (Conference on Income and Wealth) in 1936. Milton Gilbert (1909-79) and Richard Stone (1913-1991) were strategic partners with enormous international leverage in creating and diffusing standard procedures for constructing comparable national accounts (1). I Creating Standardised Estimates of GDP Growth for 1950 onwards Gilbert had been responsible for the official US accounts during the war and from 1950 to 1961 was head of statistics and national accounts in OEEC. The Marshall Plan required criteria for aid allocation, and NATO needed them for its burden-sharing exercises. Gilbert met these requirements by pushing official statistical offices of the 16 OEEC member countries to adopt a standardised system of accounts, constructed by Richard Stone. At Gilbert’s request, Stone set up a programme in Cambridge to train official European statisticians to implement the standardised system. A set of national handbooks was prepared to explain the problems of adjustment to the standardised system, and a first comparative set of accounts for the 16 countries for 1938 and 1947-52 was published by OEEC in 1954, with extensive notes explaining the adjustments which had been made to achieve comparability (the major author was Geer Stuvel, Gilbert’s deputy in OEEC).
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring and Interpreting World Economic Performance 1500–2001
    Review of Income and Wealth Series 51, Number 1, March 2005 FIRST RUGGLES LECTURE FOR THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN INCOME AND WEALTH MEASURING AND INTERPRETING WORLD ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE 1500–2001 A M University of Groningen, Netherlands I Macro-measurement started in the seventeenth century, but did not emerge as a basic analytical tool for policy analysts and economic historians until the 1940s. In the past 60 years there has been an explosion in the sophistication of policy analysis and the interpretation of history. The explosion started in 1940 with two seminal works: Keynes’ How to Pay for the War which demon-strated its usefulness as a tool of macroeconomic management, and Colin Clark’s Conditions of Economic Progress which demonstrated its value in interpreting economic history. Dissemination and development of techniques of macromeasurement was a major objective of the founding fathers of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth (IARIW). The initiative came from Simon Kuznets (1901–85), the pioneer of quantitative economic history. Milton Gilbert (1909–79) and Richard Stone (1913–91) were strategic partners with enormous international leverage in creating and diffusing standard procedures for construc- tion of comparable national accounts by official statistical offices. In the past half-century, I have followed the Kuznetsian approach, augment- ing the historical accounts and broadening their geographic scope with my own research, using it to interpret economic performance with a similar analytical toolkit and the same emphasis on transparent description of source material, encouraging graduate students to follow the same path, and creating networks of scholars active in this brand of quantitative economic history.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing the Economy at the Limits of Neoliberalism
    ! ! Governing the Economy at the Limits of Neoliberalism: The Genealogy of Systemic Risk Regulation in the United States, 1922-2012 Onur Özgöde ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2015 ©2014 Onur Özgöde All rights reserved ABSTRACT Governing the Economy at the Limits of Neoliberalism: The Genealogy of Systemic Risk Regulation in the United States, 1922-2012 Onur Özgöde This dissertation traces the genealogy of systemic risk as a pathology of monetary government of the economy and systemic risk regulation as a regulatory regime to govern this governmental problem as instituted under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act of 2010. Using resilience and vulnerability as diagnostic categories, it reconstructs the history of economic government since the New Deal as a recursive problem-solving process, plagued with negative feedback loops. It shows how different groups of experts, acting as policy entrepreneurs, problematized and framed the economy as a crisis-prone system and how they tried to reduce the catastrophe risk in the economy without restricting economic activity and growth. In doing this, the dissertation details the proposals as well as the actual governmental apparatuses set up to represent and format the economy. It argues that systemic risk regulation emerges at the intersection of two distinct, but historically interrelated genealogical threads, systemic risk and vulnerability reduction. It shows that while systemic risk has been articulated in different ways since the 1920s, its emergence in its contemporary form took place with the rise of the monetary government in the 1970s.
    [Show full text]