Albie Sachs Interview: Constitutional Court Oral History Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Albie Sachs Interview: Constitutional Court Oral History Project ALBIE SACHS INTERVIEW: CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ORAL HISTORY PROJECT INDEX 1. THE FIRST MEETING OF THE JUDGES: NOVEMBER 1994 1 2. A MOMENT ON THE ROAD TO BECOMING A JUDGE 3 3. A SECOND MOMENT ON THE PATH TO BECOMING A JUDGE 4 4. A PAINFUL INTERVIEW 5 5. SETTING UP 10 6. THE CHIEF JUSTICE DELEGATES TASKS 12 7. THE LEADERSHIP OF ARTHUR CHASKALSON 14 8. WORKSHOPPING DECISIONS 15 9. HEARING ORAL ARGUMENT 16 10. LAW CLERKS AND FOREIGN LEGAL DECISIONS 17 11. SOME EARLY CASES: Capital punishment, Certification of the Constitution, Gay rights, Housing rights, the Rastafari matter, sex work and others 24 12. DIVERSITY OF THE JUDGES 30 13. ON LEAVING THE COURT 60 14. THE ISSUE OF RACISM 67 15. THE MEDIA 73 16. HUMANISING THE COURT 74 17. THE BUILDING 81 1 Albie Sachs Constitutional Court Oral History Project Interview One: 15th November 2011 Interview Two: 16th November 2011 Interview Three: 10th January 2012 Interview One: 15th November 2011 THE FIRST MEETING OF THE JUDGES: NOVEMBER [?] 1994 AS That first meeting, eleven very excited people…the word motley comes to mind…what a motley group we seemed to be. We didn’t look like eleven judges to me. And in my own case, the first time I heard a voice saying, Judge, I didn’t respond, but looked behind me. I wasn’t used to being called a judge. But we really came in different sizes and shapes. There were the deep booming voices of the guys who’d made it through the Bar, sharp elbows, hearty laughter. John Didcott, very forceful, very brilliant. Johann Kriegler, quiet until suddenly his voice came through, boom! Laurie Ackermann, waiting for his moment and then creating a space in front of him and coming through in a very authoritative way, a distinctive cadence in the bubble of silence he had created in a crowded room. Yvonne and Kate, quiet, listening, smiling, but not thrusting themselves into this kind of hearty conversation. Pius, very assured but also very, very thoughtful, very quiet. Tholie Madala, who’s the only one whom I’m now meeting for the first time, the word stately comes to mind. He just had a stately presence and style. Quite a rich voice. At that stage Sydney Kentridge was an acting judge, and Sydney would time his melodious interventions impeccably - somehow, when he started talking, others stopped talking. There was just something about the moments he chose, the mellow voice and the sense of enormous experience and sly humour always there. I have no idea how I sounded to the others. I know that at one stage Ismail Mahomed, perhaps the most striking figure and complex personality of the whole group; spark, who could lapse into deep silences, and suddenly burst outwith brilliant observations, berated me unceremoniously: Albie, he said frostily, that’s not the kind of suit a judge ought to be wearing! And this was, I think, in November, it was hot, and I had on a suit I’d bought, fairly stylish, in London, made of a summery poplin material. And I thought, what kind of suit ought a judge to be wearing? And in a way this was part of the theme that was going to preoccupy us. A new judge, newly appointed for a completely new court, in the new South Africa, with a totally new Constitution. What does it mean to be a judge? How do you conduct yourself? How do you appear? How do you work? If I remember correctly, it was at that very first meeting that we went through a long agenda of decisions that had to be taken, all revolving around what a judge should be like in the new democratic South Africa. Maybe we didn’t reach finality in relation to each one of them at that moment. They were all specific: how should we be addressed, that was one issue. It 2 seemed very simple, very banal. And yet there’s so much history laden onto that simple thing of, are you called, “My Lord”? And now, because we have women, it’s “My Lady”. And “Honourable”.All these were, to my mind, leaden, antique imported forms of purportedly honouring the judge, but I found actually dishonouring the person, as if to say, you can’t make it on your own without the title, somehow you’re not deserving of respect simply as yourself. And very quickly we decided we didn’t want to be called ”My Lord”, or be referred to as Honourable, it would interfere with our work, the new democracy, to have these honorific impediments to natural, open, and direct dialogue and conversation. Another question: How should one dress? Should we wear a gown or not? That was more difficult. And many of us were, I suppose, super democrats, and thinking, well, you know, the gown is a symbol of authority, it cuts you off from ordinary people. But I think intuitively we felt a gown would be appropriate. I suppose the usual arguments came up: that the gown shows that you’re not just a subjective person, you’re an incumbent of an office; it displays equality between all the people sitting up on the Bench, because you’re all wearing the same gown. And in the end, without much difficulty, as I recall, we decided we would wear gowns, that somehow it fitted in to a South African, African sense of acknowledging the role, the special role, kind of a status role if you like, of the incumbents, you would wear a gown. It’s not like…or perhaps in some ways it is,akin to the skin that the elders and the leaders of the community would wear. So we should have a gown. But then we decided we wouldn’t simply take over the gowns that were being used by the other South African judges, black for criminal matters and scarlet for civil matters. We were a new court. And we weren’t simply a branch of the existing judiciary. We were a court that was established specifically to ensure that the values, the principles of the new democratic era, would seep in to and infuse the total functioning of, not only the judiciary, but all exercises of public power. So it seemed appropriate to us to have a gown of a different appearance to signify the special role, function and status of the Constitutional Court. And we chose green, a kind of dark green, with black and red on the cuffs and a white bib. I might say, anticipating a little bit, it wasn’t super elegant! But at that stage the question of style and being spruce, wasn’t uppermost. And I think the green gowns became a distinctive feature, and sometimes our critics would speak about those people in the green gowns up on the hill in Braamfontein, in a slightly dismissive way. We had a whole series of other little foundational questions like that, and to the extent that they appeared to be banal, sometimes it’s these banal details that are more telling than the grand gestures, because they are everyday and ordinary and become distinctive. Well, that’s just like a little aperitif in a way of how we started. I’d like to deal with two themes before moving on. The one is the different roads we took getting to the Court. And the second is, how we started conversing amongst ourselves. 3 A MOMENT ON THE ROAD TO BECOMING A JUDGE So first of all our different roads of getting to the Court. I won’t repeat the long interview that I gave you as part of the oral history of the Legal Resources Centre. I don’t even remember what I said in it, but I’d like to focus on my personal journey to becoming a judge. The first moment that comes back to me was, I’m in exile, I’m completing my PhD at Sussex University, I’d tried to get out of law, been there, done that, at the Cape bar for almost ten years, it was exhilarating, testing, battling, exciting, horrible, marvellous work, and now I’d wanted to do something different. So I thought I’d do a PhD, that will give me time to find a completely new career. And the theme that pounded in my head was the contradictory schizophrenic nature of the courts where I’d worked. We’d used the words of justice, fairness and equity, there would often be very polite discourse with reason running right through everything we did. On the other hand, the law had been responsible for a hundred people being executed every year, thousands being flogged, beaten, in the name of the law;a million people prosecuted under the Pass Laws each year; hundreds of thousands going to jail;huge numbers evicted from their homes, all under the law, as being enforced by the courts. How could that same institution manage both? And so my PhD was entitled: Administration of Justice in a Racially Stratified Society, South Africa 1652-1970. 1970 was my last year at Sussex University. And the dissertation is complete and I have to write the closing the words, what should they be? My thoughts veered from the one hand to the other. (I still had two arms then!) This was not long after the student rebellions in Paris, and the powerful demonstrations in the United States against the Vietnam War, a time of critical, alternative studies in all sorts of different academic areas.
Recommended publications
  • Constitutional Authority and Its Limitations: the Politics of Sexuality in South Africa
    South Africa Constitutional Authority and its Limitations: The Politics of Sexuality in South Africa Belinda Beresford Helen Schneider Robert Sember Vagner Almeida “While the newly enfranchised have much to gain by supporting their government, they also have much to lose.” Adebe Zegeye (2001) A history of the future: Constitutional rights South Africa’s Constitutional Court is housed in an architecturally innovative complex on Constitution Hill, a 100-acre site in central Johannesburg. The site is adjacent to Hillbrow, a neighborhood of high-rise apartment buildings into which are crowded thousands of mi- grants from across the country and the continent. This is one of the country’s most densely populated, cosmopolitan and severely blighted urban areas. From its position atop Constitu- tion Hill, the Court offers views of Hillbrow’s high-rises and the distant northern suburbs where the established white elite and increasing numbers of newly affluent non-white South Africans live. Thus, while the light-filled, colorful and contemporary Constitutional Court buildings reflect the progressive and optimistic vision of post-apartheid South Africa the lo- cation is a reminder of the deeply entrenched inequalities that continue to define the rights of the majority of people in the country and the continent. CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY AND ITS LIMITATIONS: THE POLITICS OF SEXUALITY IN SOUTH AFRICA 197 From the late 1800s to 1983 Constitution Hill was the location of Johannesburg’s central prison, the remains of which now lie in the shadow of the new court buildings. Former prison buildings include a fort built by the Boers (descendents of Dutch settlers) in the late 1800s to defend themselves against the thousands of men and women who arrived following the discovery of the area’s expansive gold deposits.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhodes Scholar Magazine? SCHOLAR Please Get in Contact with the 21St Century Leadership Editor; She Will Be Delighted to Hear from You
    Ode to the fallen Rhodes Scholars in the First World War Me to We Two Scholars on the scope of social enterprises Olympic participation 21st century leadership The highs and lows 4 Rhodes News 6 Then and Now First year experiences from 1964 and today 8 Rhodes Scholars in research Dr Pardis Sabeti on computational genetics and rock music 10 A year ago in England, ere the storm Marking the centenary of the start of the First World War, we remember the Rhodes Scholars who were lost 6 12 The Oxford Fairy Tale 1964 versus 2014 A current Scholar looks at the magic which underpins the city The difference fifty years makes 14 Oxford News 16 Me to We Two Rhodes Scholars on innovation within social enterprises 18 Life at the Olympics What is it really like to ski at the Olympics? 20 Where are they now? A map illustrating where Rhodes Scholars now live across the globe 16 22 Second Century Campaign innovative social enterprise Fundraising progress and a look at the new Rhodes Scholar Network How to provide people with better choices 24 Oxford through the lens Images from Soufia Siddiqi, winner of Oxford’s graduate photographic competition 26 Rhodes Alumni Bulletin 34 Class Notes 46 An hour with... Lady Williams Rhodes House reminiscences 12 47 Upcoming Rhodes events magical Oxford A unique city, full of the unexpected Contents 2 Editorial information The Rhodes Magazine is published annually in print format by the Rhodes Trust in Oxford and supplemented each year by two electronic updates. Editor: Babette Tegldal, Communications Manager Tel: +44 (0)1865 274787 Email: [email protected] Design: Jamjar Creative Cover illustration: Andrew Smith Back cover: Rhodes Alumni events around the world Photo credits: Lee Atherton for Rhodes House photos, others supplied by Scholars or with credits as specified with images.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitutional Court of South Africa: Rights Interpretation and Comparative Constitutional Law
    THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA: RIGHTS INTERPRETATION AND COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Hoyt Webb- I do hereby swear that I will in my capacity asJudge of the Constitu- tional Court of the Republic of South Africa uphold and protect the Constitution of the Republic and the fundamental rights entrenched therein and in so doing administerjustice to all persons alike with- out fear,favour or prejudice, in accordance with the Constitution and the Law of the Republic. So help me God. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Schedule 3 (Oaths of Office and Solemn Affirmations), Act No. 200, 1993. I swear that, asJudge of the ConstitutionalCourt, I will be faithful to the Republic of South Africa, will uphold and protect the Consti- tution and the human rights entrenched in it, and will administer justice to all persons alike withwut fear,favour or prejudice, in ac- cordancewith the Constitution and the Law. So help me God. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, Schedule 2 (Oaths and Solemn Affirmations), Act 108 of 1996. I. INTRODUCTION In 1993, South Africa adopted a transitional or interim Constitu- tion (also referred to as the "IC"), enshrining a non-racial, multiparty democracy, based on respect for universal rights.' This uras a monu- mental achievement considering the complex and often horrific his- tory of the Republic and the increasing racial, ethnic and religious tensions worldwide.2 A new society, however, could not be created by Hoyt Webb is an associate at Brown and Wood, LLP in NewYork City and a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Appointments to South Africa's Constitutional Court Since 1994
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 15 July 2015 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Johnson, Rachel E. (2014) 'Women as a sign of the new? Appointments to the South Africa's Constitutional Court since 1994.', Politics gender., 10 (4). pp. 595-621. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000439 Publisher's copyright statement: c Copyright The Women and Politics Research Section of the American 2014. This paper has been published in a revised form, subsequent to editorial input by Cambridge University Press in 'Politics gender' (10: 4 (2014) 595-621) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PAG Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Rachel E. Johnson, Politics & Gender, Vol. 10, Issue 4 (2014), pp 595-621. Women as a Sign of the New? Appointments to South Africa’s Constitutional Court since 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • South African Artists at the Constitutional Court of South Africa
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Decoding Memories: South African Artists at the Constitutional Court of South Africa A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in African Studies by Mary Ann Braubach 2017 © Copyright by Mary Ann Braubach 2017 ABSTRACT OF THESIS Decoding Memories: South African Artists at the Constitutional Court of South Africa by Mary Ann Braubach Master of Arts in African Studies University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor William H. Worger, Chair This paper examines the decoding of the memory of apartheid and post apartheid years of South Africa’s recent history. And it contextualizes how the struggle influenced the visual arts. Also analyzed are the history of the Constitution and Constitutional Court of South Africa. It interrogates the formation of the Constitutional Court art collection. by Justices Albie Sachs and Yvonne Mokgoro for the yet-to-be-constructed Constitutional Court building in Johannesburg. Many donated artworks are responsive both to the anti- apartheid struggles and also to the new democracy. The essay also examines the underlying politic that now hangs in the Constitutional Court building. Select works, that function as signifiers of the new Constitution, are examined. I draw on interviews with South African artists, Court Justices and curators to investigate the role of memory, the archeology of the site, and the significance of the collection to the artists, the Justices, and citizens of South Africans twenty years post apartheid.
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitutional Jurisprudence of Laurie Ackermann CATHERINE O’REGAN* Constitutional Court of South Africa
    From Form to Substance: The Constitutional Jurisprudence of Laurie Ackermann CATHERINE O’REGAN* Constitutional Court of South Africa I INTRODUCTION There is one phrase that I think best captures Laurie Ackermann’s temperament as a judge. It comes from that great judge Learned Hand’s speech in Central Park in May 1944. There, Learned Hand spoke movingly of the Spirit of Liberty. ‘Liberty’, he said, is not the ruthless, the unbridled will; it is not freedom to do as one likes . What then is the spirit of liberty? I cannot define it; I can only tell you my own faith. The spirit of liberty is the spirit which is not too sure that it is right; the spirit of liberty is the spirit which seeks to understand the mind of other men and women; the spirit of liberty is the spirit which weighs their interests alongside its own without bias . .1 There are some judges who have a deep-seated and unshakeable faith in their own sense of justice. Disagreement with their colleagues does not deter or bother them. Their sense of justice is like a shining light which guides them in their response to disputes and their judgment-writing. Other judges labour under the burden of dissent; that anxious sense that when they differ from their colleagues, they may well be wrong; that worrying remembrance of occasions in the past when even the greatest judges have erred materially, which reminds them that they too may err and so fail in their obligation to administer justice to all. Laurie Ackermann was such a judge.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Case Study Interview with David Paton Artist / Academic Senior
    Case study interview with David Paton Teaching Artist / Academic In their first year, Fine Art students at the University Senior Lecturer: Visual Art of Johannesburg (UJ, formerly the Technikon University of Johannesburg, South Africa Witwatersrand) have a project in printmaking to produce hade-made books based on the Bill of Rights. This involvement with the book has its roots in an interest in the book arts by current and former staff in the department who include, Kim Berman, Philippa Hobbs, Sr. Sheila Flynn and Willem Boshoff. Many important book artists in South Africa: Giulio Tambellini, Flip Hatting, Sonya Strafella and Carol Hofmeyr amongst others, received their introduction to the genre as students of the Department. UJ’s Graphic Design students undertake book-design in their 3rd and 4th year, but they print and bind them outside of the university. At the Michaelis School of Fine Art (University of Cape Town) their printmaking department has, for many years, included tuition in fine press and artists’ books, with post-graduate students sometimes www.theartistsbook.org.za producing artists’ books as part of their output. Some David Paton is the creator of this research website, of these books can be found in the School’s Katrine made to share information, development and ideas Harries Print Cabinet (KHPK – found at http://cca. around the South African Artist’s Book over the last uct.ac.za/collections/print-cabinet/). Most Fine Art 15 years. It shows a vast range of the prolific artists’ Departments of Universities of Technology (formerly books production in South Africa, with a searchable ‘Technikons’) such as the Durban University of database of artists, including images of their books.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Transcript Johann Kriegler Interview with Johann Kriegler, 2 February
    Interview with Johann Kriegler, 2 February 2016, Johannesburg (based on notes) Interaction with Mandela around the 1994 elections TT What interaction did you have with Nelson Mandela in the context of the 1994 elections? JK My first contact with Mandela was a phone call fairly early on encouraging me in the work of administering the election, saying that he and the party realised that there were difficulties, and I should know that I had the support of the party and its confidence. Mandela would call personally, unlike the usual CEO, whose PA calls you to say the CEO would like to speak to you and then you wait for the CEO. My first face-to-face meeting with Mandela was at a full meeting of the TEC [Transitional Executive Council] presided over by De Klerk four to five weeks before the election. It was a general TEC meeting with reports from various sub- councils. In mid-April there was a TEC meeting at which Mandela was present where I reported on a meeting with the IFP. There was at one point talk of a boycott of the elections by the ZCC [Zion Christian Church]. At that time there were several threats of boycott: IFP, Bophuthatswana, Ciskei, and the right wing. I went to meet with Bishop Lekganyane to persuade him to support the process, before Easter. He said that he had invited the leaders of all parties to attend the Easter celebration at Moria to set the right tone for the election, which seemed to imply that he would be encouraging participation At the Easter meeting I sat in the church next to Mandela for two hours.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Frank Michelman Constitutional Court Oral History Project 28Th
    Frank Michelman Constitutional Court Oral History Project 28th February 2013 Int This is an interview with Professor Frank Michelman, and it’s the 28th of February 2013. Frank, thank you so much for agreeing to participate in the Constitutional Court Oral History Project, we really appreciate your time. FM I’m very much honoured by your inviting me to participate and I’m happy to do so. Int Thank you. I’ve not had the opportunity to interview you before, and I wondered whether you could talk about early childhood memories, and some of the formative experiences that may have led you down a legal and academic professional trajectory? FM Well, that’s going to be difficult, because…because I didn’t have any notion at all prior to my senior year in college, the year before I entered law school, that I would be going to law school. I hadn’t formed, that I can recall, any plan, hope, ambition, in that direction at all. To the extent that I had any distinct career notion in mind during the years before I wound up going to law school? It would have been an academic career, possibly in the field of history, in which I was moderately interested and which was my concentration in college. I had formed a more or less definite idea of applying to graduate programs in history, and turning myself into a history professor. Probably United States history. United States history, or maybe something along the line of what’s now called the field of ideas, which I was calling intellectual history in those days.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chief Justice Retires
    JUDICIARY The Chief Justice retires Jeremy Gauntlett se Cape Bar HE Hon Mr Justice MM Corbett sion to the University of Cape is expected to step down as the Town. He commenced a BA de­ Tsixteenth Chief Justice ofthe Re­ gree. On turning 18 later in 1941, public of South Africa later this year. he proceeded to enlist. He has served in that office since 1Feb­ Commissioned in the South Af­ ruary 1989, in the Appellate Division rican Tank Corps, Lt MM Corbett since 1979, and as a judge since 1963. transferred to the First Royal Na­ He would ordinarily have retired (on the tal Carbineers and proceeded to attainment of what Holmes, JA has en­ Italy as part of the Sixth South gagingly termed the age of statutory se­ African Armoured Division, to nility) on 14 September 1993. On 10 take part in the campaign by the February 1993, however, the then State Eighth Army of the Allied Forces. President, Mr FW de Klerk, announced He was injured after the capture of (after consultation with opposition Rome and Florence, and boarded groupings in South Africa) that the out of the army in May 1945. He Chief Justice had accepted an invitation immediately resumed his LLB de­ to continue in office. His confirmation gree at the University of Cape was welcomed by Mr NR Mandela, then Town. He went to Cambridge in leader of the ANC, "particularly given October 1946, obtaining a first the wide respect and confidence he en­ class in the Law Tripos, whereaf­ joys". The then Democratic Party spokes­ ter he read for the LLB degree, in man on justice, Mr Tony Leon, referred which he also obtained a first (in to the qualities of the Chief Justice nec­ 1948).
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Years of the Kwazulu-Natal Bench by LB Broster SC, a Coutsoudis and AJ Boulle, Kwazulu-Natal Bar
    SA JUDICIARY100 YEARS OLD Juta, Kotzé and rule from 1949-1959), and Munnik CJ (from 1981-1992). Hlophe Menzies who were CJ, the first black JP of the division, is perhaps the best-known of either judges of the the current group of Judges President in the country. Amongst court or members of other things, he was responsible for the controversial decision in the families of judges of dispute between the Pharmaceutical Society of South Africa, New the court. Clicks South Africa (Pty) Ltd and the Minister of Health (New Clicks Perhaps the most South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Tshabalala-Msimang and Another NNO; well-known advocate Pharmaceutical Society of South Africa and Others v Tshabalala- ever to practise in Msimang and Another NNO 2005 (2) SA 530 (C)). the Cape was Harry The CPD also made important contributions to the development Snitcher QC, who also of the new constitutional law in cases such as the Grootboom deci- acted for appellants sion that enforced the right to housing (Government of the Republic Judge President John Hlophe, in the Harris decision, and Cape High Court of South Africa and Others v Grootboom and Others 2001 (1) SA 46 many another similar cause (CC)) and the Metrorail decision which enforced the right to life (Rail celebre. Commuters Action Group and Others v Transnet Ltd t/a Metrorail Of the Judges President of the court, several stand out purely and Others 2005 (2) SA 359 (CC)). because of the long duration of their tenure. These were Van Zyl CJ In this way the division has contributed to a process of constitu- (who took the court through the difficult years of the aftermath of tional development - from Slave Lodge to beacon of Good Hope.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a PDF Preview
    Judith Mason Anne Sassoon Leora Maltz-Leca Kate McCrickard Copyright © 2010 the artist, the authors and David Krut Publishing ISBN: 978-0-9814328-2-3 Editor and Project Manager Bronwyn Law-Viljoen Designer Ellen Papciak-Rose Photo credits Susan Byrne, all photographs of the artist’s work Cover image Inside/Out, 2009 Gouache on panel, 91.4 x 68.6 cm These fragments from a South African journey are now fragments of memory, salvaged and celebrated in paint. Printed by Keyprint, Johannesburg Distributed in South Africa by David Krut Publishing cc. 140 Jan Smuts Avenue Parkwood, 2193 South Africa t +27 (0)11 880 5648 f +27 (0)11 880 6368 [email protected] Distributed in North America by David Krut Projects 526 West 26th Street, #816 New York, NY 10001 USA t +1 212 255 3094 f +1 212 400 2600 [email protected] www.davidkrutpublishing.com www.taxiartbooks.com CONTENTS 7 INTRODUCTION Judith Mason 28 COLLECTING EVIDENCE: ART AND THE APARTHEID STATE Anne Sassoon 50 THE LOGIC OF THE RELIC: TRACES OF HISTORY IN STONE AND MILK Leora Maltz-Leca 77 EXILE ON MAIN STREET: THE AMERICAN WORKS OF PAUL STOPFORTH, 1989–2009 Kate McCrickard 92 Selected Exhibitions 94 Selected Bibliography Honours and Awards 95 Collections Biographies 96 Wounded Man, 1988 Charcoal on paper, 76 x 56 cm Acknowledgements 6 INTRODUCTION Judith Mason Some decades ago, a certain man died while When, later, Stopforth drew Steve Biko’s bruised corpse, being interrogated by the South African Secu- the viewer felt that she was at the autopsy, spinning a rity Police.
    [Show full text]