40998 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 134 / Tuesday, July 14, 2015 / Notices

from the provisions relating to public Suntech is eligible for a separate rate, Petitioner submitted an untimely meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 and have calculated a dumping margin hearing request on February 9, 2015, sections 10(a)(1) and l0(a)(3). The for Suntech. The final dumping which was rejected by the Department remaining portions of the meeting will margins for this review are listed in the in accordance with 19 CFR 351.302(d).6 be open to the public. ‘‘Final Results’’ section below. On February 25, 2015, Petitioner For more information, call Yvette DATES: Effective date: July 14, 2015. submitted an untimely request for Springer at (202) 482–2813. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: additional time to submit a hearing 7 Dated: July 9, 2015. Brandon Farlander or Drew Jackson AD/ request. The Department did not grant Petitioner’s request.8 On May 18, 2015, Yvette Springer, CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement Wuxi Suntech withdrew its request for Committee Liaison Officer. and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of a hearing.9 On June 1, 2015, the [FR Doc. 2015–17235 Filed 7–13–15; 8:45 am] Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Department notified interested parties BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; that it would not hold a hearing in this telephone: (202) 482–0182 or (202) 482– administrative review.10 4406, respectively. Between January 2015 and March DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 2015, the Department issued SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: supplemental questionnaires regarding International Trade Administration Background separate rates to, and received timely [A–570–979] On January 8, 2015, the Department responses from, the Wuxi Suntech published its Preliminary Results in this Single Entity.11 In March 2015, the Photovoltaic Cells, review. On January 22, 2015, Petitioner 2 Department conducted verification of Whether or Not Assembled Into submitted comments regarding the the Wuxi Suntech Single Entity’s Modules, From the People’s Republic preliminary margin calculation of the separate rates information. of : Final Results of Antidumping companies that are considered as the On March 23, 2015, the following Duty Administrative Review and Final Single Entity in this final interested parties submitted case briefs: Determination of No Shipments; 2012– determination including Yingli Energy (1) Petitioner; (2) Yingli Energy (China) 12 2013 (China) Company Limited.3 Company Limited; (3) Goal Zero, LLC; On January 9, 2015, Wuxi Suntech AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 6 submitted a hearing request.4 On See Letter to the File through Howard Smith, International Trade Administration, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV Department of Commerce. February 9, 2015 JA Solar ‘‘Rejection and Removal from the Record of Technology Co., Ltd., JA Solar Untimely Filed Hearing Request,’’ dated March 3, SUMMARY: On January 8, 2015, the Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd. and 2015. Department of Commerce (the JingAo Solar Co., Ltd. submitted a 7 See Letter to the Department from Petitioner, ‘‘Department’’) published its ‘‘Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether Or request to participate in any hearing Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s Preliminary Results in the 2012–2013 5 held by the Department in this review. Republic of China: Request for Opportunity to administrative review of the Submit Hearing Requests,’’ dated February 9, 2015. antidumping duty order on crystalline 2 Petitioner in this proceeding is SolarWorld 8 See Letter to the Petitioner from the Department, silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or America, Inc. ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of not assembled into modules (‘‘solar 3 See Letter to the Department from Petitioner, Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or ‘‘Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Not Assembled into Modules, from the People’s cells’’) from the People’s Republic of Republic of China: Rejection and Removal from the 1 Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the China (‘‘PRC’’). The period of review People’s Republic of China: Comments on Record of Untimely Filed Hearing Request,’’ dated (‘‘POR’’) is May 25, 2012, through Ministerial Errors in the Preliminary Results,’’ March 3, 2015. November 30, 2013. This administrative dated January 22, 2015. The Department 9 See Letter to the Department from Wuxi review covers two mandatory determined, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f), that the Suntech, ‘‘Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, following affiliated companies should be treated as Whether Or Not Assembled into Modules, from the respondents, Yingli Energy (China) a single entity: Yingli Energy (China) Company People’s Republic of China: Withdraw of Request Company Limited and Wuxi Suntech Limited ; Tianwei Yingli New Energy for Hearing—Wuxi Co., Ltd.,’’ dated Power Co., Ltd. (‘‘Wuxi Suntech’’), Resources Co., Ltd. (‘‘Tianwei Yingli’’); May 18, 2015. which was found to be ineligible for a Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd. (‘‘Tianjin 10 See Memorandum to All Interested Parties, Yingli’’); Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources through Howard Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office separate rate in the Preliminary Results. Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hengshui Yingli’’); Lixian Yingli New IV, Administrative Review of the Antidumping Based on our analysis of the comments Energy Resources Co., Ltd. (‘‘Lixian Yingli’’); Duty Order on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic received, we made certain changes to Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, our margin calculations for Yingli (‘‘Jiasheng’’); Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy from the People’s Republic of China; Withdrawal of Energy (China) Company Limited. Resources Co., Ltd. (‘‘Beijing Tianneng’’); Hainan Hearing Request, dated June 1, 2015. Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hainan 11 In the Preliminary Results, the Department Additionally, we now find that Wuxi Yingli’’) (collectively, the ‘‘Yingli Single Entity’’). preliminarily found that the Wuxi Suntech Single See Memorandum to Abdelali Elouaradia, Director, Entity included the following companies: Wuxi 1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, through Howard Suntech; Suntech Power Co., Ltd. Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, ‘‘Crystalline (‘‘Luoyang Suntech’’); Suntech Power Co., Ltd. People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not (‘‘Shanghai Suntech’’); and Wuxi Sunshine Power Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s Co. Ltd (‘‘Wuxi Sunshine’’). See Memorandum to Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012– Republic of China: Affiliation and Single Entity Abdelali Elouaradia, Director, AD/CVD Operations, 2013, 80 FR 1021 (January 8, 2015) (‘‘Preliminary Status,’’ dated December 31, 2014. Office IV, through Howard Smith, Program Results’’), and Memorandum to Paul Piquado, 4 See Letter to the Department from Wuxi Manager, AD/CVD Operations. Office IV, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Suntech, ‘‘Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells ‘‘Affiliation and Single Entity Status of Wuxi Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate from the People’s Republic of China: Request for Suntech Power Co., Ltd.; Luoyang Suntech Power Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Hearing- Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd.,’’ dated Co., Ltd.; Suntech Power Co., Ltd.; and Wuxi Countervailing Operations, ‘‘Decision January 9, 2015. Sunshine Power Co., Ltd.,’’ dated December 31, Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the 5 See Letter to the Department from Shanghai JA 2014. 2012–2013 Antidumping Duty Administrative Solar Technology Co., Ltd., JA Solar Technology 12 Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited’s case Review of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Yangzhou Co., Ltd. and JingAo Solar Co., Ltd., and rebuttal briefs were submitted on behalf of Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the ‘‘Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Yingli Green Energy Holding Company Limited and People’s Republic of China’’ (‘‘Preliminary Decision Not Assembled into Modules, from the People’s Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc., and their Memorandum’’), dated December 31, 2014. Republic of China: Hearing,’’ dated January 9, 2015. affiliates, including Yingli Energy (China) Co., Ltd.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Jul 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM 14JYN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 134 / Tuesday, July 14, 2015 / Notices 40999

(4) LDK Solar Hi-Tech (Nanchang) Co. Sunshine.17 Subsequently, on May 8, Decision Memorandum,20 which is Ltd.; (5) Sunlink PV Technology 2015, and May 11, 2015, Wuxi Suntech hereby adopted by this notice. A list of Co., Ltd.; (6) Years Solar Co. Ltd.; (7) and Petitioner, respectively, submitted the issues that parties raised, and to CSG PVTech Co., Ltd.; and (8) Shanghai case briefs regarding the separate-rate which we responded in the Issues and JA Solar Technology Co. Ltd, JA Solar status of the Wuxi Suntech Single Decision Memorandum, follows as an Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd. and Entity. On May 13, 2015, the following appendix to this notice. The Issues and JingAo Solar Co., Ltd. On March 25, parties submitted rebuttal comments Decision Memorandum is a public 2015, Yingli Energy (China) Company related to the separate-rate status of the document and is on file electronically Limited alleged that Petitioner’s March Wuxi Suntech Single Entity: (1) via Enforcement and Compliance’s 23, 2015 case brief contained untimely Petitioner; (2) Wuxi Suntech; (3) Antidumping and Countervailing Duty filed new factual information,13 and on Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd. and Shangluo Centralized Electronic Service System March 27, 2015, Petitioner rebutted BYD Industrial Co., Ltd.; and (4) (‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to these allegations.14 After considering Changzhou Energy Co., Ltd. registered users at http:// Yingli Energy (China) Company On April 28, 2015, the Department access.trade.gov and in the Central Limited’s allegation, the Department did extended the deadline for issuing these Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main not require Petitioner to redact its case final results of review by 60 days, until Department of Commerce building. In brief. On March 30, 2015, the July 7, 2015.18 addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can Department notified Yingli Energy Scope of the Order (China) Company Limited that its March be accessed directly on the Internet at 23, 2015 case brief contained untimely The merchandise covered by the order http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The filed new factual information. The is crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, paper copy and electronic version of the Department subsequently rejected the and modules, laminates, and panels, Issues and Decision Memorandum are case brief in accordance with 19 CFR consisting of crystalline silicon identical in content. photovoltaic cells, whether or not 351.302(d)(1)(i) and 19 CFR Changes Since the Preliminary Results 351.104(a)(2)(ii)(A) because it contained partially or fully assembled into other untimely filed new factual information products, including, but not limited to, Changes Specific to Wuxi Suntech modules, laminates, panels and building • but provided Yingli Energy (China) 19 Found that Wuxi Suntech and Company Limited the opportunity to integrated materials. Merchandise Luoyang Suntech should be treated as a resubmit its case brief with the new covered by this review is classifiable single entity (the ‘‘Wuxi Luoyang Single factual information redacted.15 On under subheading 8501.61.0000, Entity.’’ 8507.20.80, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030, March 31, 2015, Yingli Energy (China) • Found that the Wuxi Luoyang and 8501.31.8000 of the Harmonized Company Limited submitted comments Single Entity has established its Tariff Schedule of the United States on the new factual information eligibility for a separate rate. (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS allegation, and resubmitted its rejected • Calculated a dumping margin for subheadings are provided for case brief.16 On March 30, 2015, the the Wuxi Luoyang Single Entity. convenience and customs purposes, our following interested parties submitted written description of the scope of the Changes Specific to Yingli Energy rebuttal briefs: (1) Petitioner; (2) Yingli order is dispositive. (China) Company Limited Energy (China) Company Limited; and, • Revised surrogate value (3) Wuxi Suntech. These case briefs and Analysis of Comments Received calculations for certain direct materials, rebuttal briefs did not include All issues raised in the case and labor, financial ratios, and movement comments regarding the separate-rate rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this expenses. status of the Wuxi Suntech Single review are addressed in the Issues and • Revised certain material offsets. Entity, which was preliminarily found • Revised the indirect selling expense to include the following companies: (1) 17 See Memorandum to The File through Jeffrey ratio. Wuxi Suntech, (2) Luoyang Suntech; (3) Pedersen, Acting Program Manager, AD/CVD • Corrected ministerial errors. Shanghai Suntech; and (4) Wuxi Operations, Office IV, ‘‘Administrative Review of • Revised the partial AFA the Antidumping Duty Order on Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into calculation. and Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Modules, from the People’s Republic of China; Other Changes Co., Ltd. Briefing Schedule,’’ dated February 27, 2015 13 See Letter to the Department from Yingli (establishing a deadline for case briefs and rebuttal • Corrections to list of separate rate Energy (China) Company Limited, ‘‘Crystalline briefs concerning all issues except the separate-rate companies and no shipment companies. Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not status of the Wuxi Suntech Single Entity). Assembled into Modules from the People’s 18 See Memorandum to Edward Yang, Senior Final Determination of No Shipments Republic of China: Request that the Department Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, through Reject SolarWorld’s Case Brief,’’ dated May, 2015. Howard Smith, Acting Director, AD/CVD In the Preliminary Results, we found 14 See Letter to the Department from Petitioner, Operations, Office IV, ‘‘Crystalline Silicon that 23 companies subject to this ‘‘Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into administrative review did not have Not Assembled into Modules, from the People’s Modules, from the People’s Republic of China: Republic of China: Response to Yingli’s Request to Extension of Deadline for Final Results of reviewable transactions during the Reject SolarWorld’s Case Brief,’’ dated May 27, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated POR.21 We did not receive any 2015. April 28, 2015. comments concerning our finding of no 15 See Memorandum to The File through Howard 19 For a complete description of the scope of the shipments by these 23 companies. For Smith, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations, order, see Memorandum from Edward Yang, Senior these final results, the Department Office IV, ‘‘Rejection from the Record of Untimely Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, to Paul Filed New Factual Information,’’ dated April 2, Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 2015. Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Final 20 See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 16 See Letter from Yingli Energy (China) Company Results of the 2012–2013 Antidumping Duty 21 See Preliminary Results and accompanying Limited to the Department, ‘‘Crystalline Silicon Administrative Review of Crystalline Silicon Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5–6. We also Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into preliminarily treated two companies which Modules from the People’s Republic of China: Modules, from the People’s Republic of China,’’ reported making no shipments during the POR, Resubmission of Yingli’s Case Brief,’’ dated March (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’), dated Luoyang Suntech and Shanghai Suntech, as part of 31, 2015. concurrently with this notice. the Wuxi Suntech Single Entity.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Jul 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM 14JYN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 41000 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 134 / Tuesday, July 14, 2015 / Notices

continues to find that 23 companies that Additionally, the Department adverse facts available (‘‘AFA’’) when a claimed no shipments during the POR continues to find, pursuant to 19 CFR party has failed to cooperate by not did not have any reviewable 351.401(f), that the following affiliated acting to the best of its ability to comply transactions of subject merchandise companies should be treated as a single with a request for information. during the POR.22 entity: (1) Yingli Energy (China) Pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of In the Preliminary Results, we found Company Limited; (2) Baoding Tianwei the Act, in the Preliminary that two companies, CSG PVTech Co., Yingli; (3) Tianjin Yingli; (4) Hengshui Determination, the Department applied Ltd. and Jiangsu Sunlink PV Technology Yingli; (5) Lixian Yingli; (6) Jiasheng; (7) partial adverse facts available (‘‘AFA’’) Co., Ltd., that claimed no exports, sales Beijing Tianneng; and (8) Hainan to a portion of Yingli Energy (China) or entries of subject merchandise during Yingli.26 Company Limited’s sales. After the POR did, in fact, sell subject Verification considering comments submitted by merchandise to the United States during interested parties, the Department the POR.23 Interested parties As provided in section 782(i) of the continues to find that the application of commented on the Department’s Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the partial AFA is warranted, however, the preliminary finding with respect to ‘‘Act’’), the Department verified separate Department has revised the these two companies.24 After rate information provided by the Wuxi methodology used to apply partial AFA considering these comments, the Suntech Single Entity.27 The to a portion of Yingli Energy (China) Department continues to find that these Department conducted the verification Company Limited’s sales for these final companies sold or made entries of using standard verification procedures results of review.28 Further, the subject merchandise to the United including the examination of relevant Department continues to find that the States during the POR. Neither of these records and the selection and review of application of FA to account for Yingli companies filed a separate rate original documentation containing (China) Company Limited’s unreported application or certification and thus relevant information. The results of the factors of production (‘‘FOP’’) data is they have not established their verification are outlined in the public warranted.29 entitlement to a separate rate in this version of the verification reports. The Wuxi Suntech did not report certain review. verification reports are on file FOP data from certain suppliers or electronically via ACCESS. Affiliation and Single Entity tollers. Based on the specific facts on Determination Use of Partial Facts Available and the record of this review and in Adverse Facts Available accordance with section 776(a)(1) of the For these final results of review, the Section 776(a) of the Act provides that Act, the Department is applying FA Department finds, pursuant to 19 CFR with respect to these unreported FOP 351.401(f), that Wuxi Suntech and the Department shall apply facts 30 available (‘‘FA’’) if (1) necessary data. Due to the proprietary nature of Luoyang Suntech comprise a single the factual information concerning these entity (i.e., the Wuxi Luoyang Single information is not on the record, or (2) an interested party or any other person FOP data, we explain the decision to Entity), which does not include use FA with respect to these FOP data Shanghai Suntech or Wuxi Sunshine.25 (A) withholds information that has been requested, (B) fails to provide in a separate business proprietary memorandum.31 As FA, we used FOP 22 Those 23 companies with no shipments during information within the deadlines the POR are: (1) DelSolar Co., Ltd.; (2) Dongfang established, or in the form and manner data that Wuxi Suntech was able to Electric (Yixing) MAGI Technology requested by the Department, subject to obtain from certain tollers or its own Co., Ltd.; (3) ET Limited; (4) Hengdian subsections (c)(1) and (e) of section 782 FOP information. Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., Ltd.; (5) Himin Clean Energy Holdings Co., Ltd.; (6) Jiangsu Green Power of the Act, (C) significantly impedes a Separate Rates PV Co., Ltd.; (7) Jiangsu Jiasheng Photovoltaic proceeding, or (D) provides information Technology Co., Ltd.; (8) JinkoSolar International that cannot be verified as provided by In the Preliminary Results, the Limited; (9) Konca Co., Ltd.; (10) Kuttler section 782(i) of the Act. Department listed 20 companies not Automation Systems (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (11) selected as mandatory respondents as Motech (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; (12) Section 776(b) of the Act further provides that the Department may use having demonstrated their eligibility for Ningbo Ulica Solar Science & Technology Co., Ltd.; 32 (13) Perlight Solar Co., Ltd.; (14) Suntech separate rates. Since the Preliminary Power Co., Ltd.; (15) ShunFeng PV; (16) Sumec Single Entity Status of Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Results, the Department has not Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd.; (17) Tianwei New Ltd. and Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd., Final received any comments that would Energy (Chengdu) PV Module Co., Ltd.; (18) Results of Review,’’ dated concurrently with this warrant a review of our preliminary Upsolar Group Co., Ltd.; (19) Wanxiang Import & notice. results regarding 19 of these companies. Export Co., Ltd.; (20) Yangzhou Rietech Renewal 26 See Memorandum to Abdelali Elouaradia, Energy Co., Ltd.; (21) Yangzhou Suntech Power Co., Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, through Therefore we continue to find that these Ltd.; (22) Zhejiang Jiutai New Energy Co., Ltd.; (23) Howard Smith, Program Manager, AD/CVD companies are eligible for a separate Zhenjiang Rietech New Energy Science & Operations, Office IV, ‘‘Crystalline Silicon rate.33 Regarding LDK Solar Hi-tech Technology Co., Ltd. As noted above, the Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Department has treated Luoyang Suntech, which Modules, from the People’s Republic of China: 28 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at reported making no shipments during the POR, as Affiliation and Single Entity Status,’’ dated Comment 9. part of the Wuxi Luoyang Single Entity. December 31, 2014. 23 29 See Preliminary Determination. See Preliminary Results and accompanying 27 See Memorandum to the File through Howard 30 Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5–6. Smith, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations, See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 24 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Office IV, Verification of the Separate Rates Comment 9. comment entitled, ‘‘Treatment of Jiangsu Sunlink Questionnaire Responses of Wuxi Suntech Power 31 See Memorandum through Howard Smith, PV Technology Co., Ltd.’’ and comment entitled, Co., Ltd., dated April 28, 2015; Memorandum to the Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, ‘‘Treatment of CSG PVTech Co., Ltd.’’ File through Howard Smith, Program Manager, AD/ to Robert Bolling, Acting Director, AD/CVD 25 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at the CVD Operations, Office IV, Verification of the Operations, Office IV, ‘‘Crystalline Silicon comment entitled, ‘‘The Department’s Separate Separate Rates Questionnaire Responses of Suntech Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Rates Practice,’’ and the comment entitled, Power Co., Ltd., dated April 28, 2015; and Modules, from the People’s Republic of China: ‘‘Separate Rate Status of the Wuxi Suntech Memorandum to the File through Howard Smith, Unreported Factors of Production,’’ dated Collapsed Entity.’’ See also Memorandum to Robert Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, concurrently with this notice. Bolling, Acting Director, AD/CVD Operations, Verification of the Separate Rates Questionnaire 32 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 13. Office IV, through Howard Smith, Program Responses of Wuxi Sunshine Power Co., Ltd., dated 33 The Department finds that the following 19 Manager, AD/CVD Operations, IV, ‘‘Affiliation and April 28, 2015. non-selected companies demonstrated their

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Jul 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM 14JYN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 134 / Tuesday, July 14, 2015 / Notices 41001

(Nanchang) Co., Ltd., in the Preliminary collapsed, but are no longer collapsing, individual respondents not selected for Results, the Department inadvertently with Wuxi Suntech, Shanghai Suntech examination when the Department listed this company as a company that reported that it made no shipments limits its examination in an was granted a separate rate. Because the during the POR,38 and the Department, administrative review pursuant to review of LDK Solar Hi-tech (Nanchang) based on its examination of record section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act. Co., Ltd. was rescinded in July 2014, evidence, finds that this company did Generally, the Department looks to that company is not subject to this not have any reviewable transactions of section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 39 review and thus no determination was subject merchandise during the POR. provides instructions for calculating the made in this review with respect to its Because Shanghai Suntech did not have all-others rate in an investigation, for separate rate status.34 any reviewable transactions during the guidance when calculating the rate for POR, it does not qualify to be granted PRC-Wide Entity respondents which we did not separate rates status.40 Additionally, all In the Preliminary Results, the parties withdrew their requests to individually examine in an Department preliminarily determined to review Wuxi Sunshine and thus it is not administrative review. Section treat 21 companies subject to this subject to this administrative review.41 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs the review as part of the PRC-wide entity The Department continues to find that Department to avoid calculating an all- because they did not establish their the remaining companies preliminarily others rate using rates which are zero, eligibility to receive a separate rate.35 found not to have established their de minimis or based entirely on facts Interested parties commented on the eligibility for a separate rate to be part available. Accordingly, the Department’s preliminary decision to of the PRC-wide entity.42 In addition, Department’s usual practice has been to treat the Wuxi Suntech Single Entity, the Department finds that LDK Hi-Tech average the weighted-average dumping ERA Solar Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Sunlink PV (Nanchang Co., Ltd., which did not margins for the selected companies, Technology Co., Ltd., CSG PVTech Co., provide the Department with excluding rates that are zero, de Ltd., and Leye Photovoltaic Co., Ltd. as information regarding its eligibility for minimis, or based entirely on facts 36 part of the PRC-wide entity. In the separate rate status, is also a part of the available.45 Accordingly, the Preliminary Results, the Department PRC-wide entity.43 Further, the Department assigned to the companies collapsed Wuxi Suntech, Luoyang Department finds that Leye Photovoltaic that it did not individually examine, but Suntech, Shanghai Suntech, and Wuxi Co., Ltd. is not subject to this which demonstrated their eligibility for Sunshine into a single entity, the Wuxi administrative review, and, therefore, a separate rate, the weighted-average Suntech Single Entity, and did not grant retains its combination rate, i.e., this single entity a separate rate. In these dumping margins calculated for the two separate rate for merchandise produced mandatory respondents.46 final results we are only collapsing and exported by Leye Photovoltaic Co., Wuxi Suntech and Luoyang Suntech. Ltd., which it received in the underlying Final Results Based on record information, we find investigation.44 the collapsed entity comprising Wuxi We determine that the following Suntech and Luoyang Suntech has Rate for Separate-Rate Companies Not weighted-average dumping margins established its entitlement to a separate Selected as Mandatory Respondents exist for the POR: rate because it is wholly foreign The statute and the Department’s owned.37 With respect to the other two regulations do not address the companies that we preliminarily establishment of a rate to be applied to

Weighted-average Exporter dumping margin (percent)

Yingli Single Entity: Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited/Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Lixian Yingli New Energy Re- sources Co., Ltd./Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd./Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd.47 ...... 0.79 Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd./Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd ...... 33.08

eligibility for separate rates: (1) Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Suntech Single Entity, Wuxi Sunshine is not International Limited; (2) Canadian Solar Review, 79 FR 43713, 43714 (July 28, 2014). For entitled to the separate-rate rate status previously Manufacturing (Changshu) Inc.; (3) Canadian Solar additional discussion, see Issues and Decision granted to that Single Entity. Accordingly, it is part Manufacturing (Luoyang) Inc.; (4) Changzhou Trina Memorandum at Comment 8. of the PRC-Wide Entity for cash deposit purposes. Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Trina Solar (Changzhou) 35 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 15. 42 See infra n. 49 for a list of companies that the Science and Technology Co., Ltd.; (5) Chint Solar 36 See Issues and Decision Memorandum. Department has determined should be treated as (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.; (6) De-Tech Trading Limited 37 Id. part of the PRC-wide entity. HK; (7) Eoplly New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.; 38 43 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at (8) Hangzhou Sunny Energy See Shanghai Suntech’s February 26, 2014 Comment 8. Science and Technology Co., Ltd.; (9) submission to the Department. 44 Import and Export Co., Ltd.; (10) Ningbo Qixin 39 See Shanghai Suntech’s October 21, 2014 Id. at Comment 7. Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd.; (11) Renesola submission to the Department. 45 See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From Jiangsu Ltd.; (12) Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd.; (13) 40 Shanghai Suntech received its separate rate as France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Shenzhen Co. Ltd.; (14) Sopray Energy a company that belonged to the Wuxi Suntech Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Co., Ltd.; (15) Star Power International Limited; (16) Single Entity. Because we find that Shanghai Administrative Reviews and Rescission of Reviews Sun Earth Solar Power Co., Ltd.; (17) Yingli Green Suntech is no longer part of the Wuxi Suntech in Part, 73 FR 52823, 52824 (September 11, 2008), Energy Holding Company Limited; (18) Yingli Single Entity and is subject to review, we have and accompanying Issues and Decision Green Energy International Trading Company considered whether it qualifies to be granted a Memorandum at Comment 16. Limited; and (19) Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy separate-rate in this review. 46 See Memorandum to the File, through Howard Science & Technology Limited Liability Company. 41 In the investigation, Wuxi Sunshine received Smith, Program Manager, AD/CVD Operations, 34 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, its separate rate as a company that belonged to the Office IV, ‘‘Calculation of the Final Margin for Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules From the Wuxi Suntech Single Entity. Because we find that Separate Rate Recipients,’’ dated concurrently with People’s Republic of China: Amended Partial Wuxi Sunshine is no longer part of the Wuxi this notice.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Jul 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM 14JYN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 41002 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 134 / Tuesday, July 14, 2015 / Notices

Weighted-average Exporter dumping margin (percent)

Canadian Solar International Limited ...... 9.67 Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu) Inc ...... 9.67 Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) Inc ...... 9.67 Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd.48 ...... 9.67 Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd ...... 9.67 De-Tech Trading Limited HK ...... 9.67 Eoplly New Energy Technology Co., Ltd ...... 9.67 Hangzhou Zhejiang University Sunny Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd ...... 9.67 Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd ...... 9.67 Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd ...... 9.67 Renesola Jiangsu Ltd ...... 9.67 Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd ...... 9.67 Shenzhen Topray Solar Co. Ltd ...... 9.67 Sopray Energy Co., Ltd ...... 9.67 Star Power International Limited ...... 9.67 Sun Earth Solar Power Co., Ltd ...... 9.67 Yingli Green Energy Holding Company Limited ...... 9.67 Yingli Green Energy International Trading Company Limited ...... 9.67 Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology Limited Liability Company ...... 9.67 PRC-Wide Entity 49 ...... 50 238.95

Assessment Rates these final results of this review. In minimis, the Department will instruct The Department will determine, and accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), CBP to liquidate appropriate entries 53 U.S. Customs and Border Protection we are calculating importer- (or without regard to antidumping duties. (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping customer-) specific assessment rates for On October 24, 2011, the Department duties on all appropriate entries covered the merchandise subject to this review. announced a refinement to its by this review. The Department intends For any individually examined assessment practice in NME 54 to issue assessment instructions to CBP respondent whose weighted-average antidumping duty cases. Pursuant to 15 days after the publication date of dumping margin is above de minimis this refinement in practice, for (i.e., 0.50 percent), the Department will merchandise that was not reported in 47 As noted above these companies comprise the calculate importer- (or customer)- the U.S. sales databases submitted by an Yingli Single Entity. specific assessment rates for exporter individually examined during 48 In the investigation in this proceeding, the merchandise subject to this review. this review, but that entered under the Department treated Changzhou Trina Solar Energy case number of that exporter (i.e., at the Co., Ltd. and Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Where the respondent reported reliable Technology Co., Ltd. as a single entity. See entered values, the Department individually-examined exporter’s cash Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or calculated importer- (or customer)- deposit rate), the Department will Not Assembled into Modules, from the People’s instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at specific ad valorem rates by aggregating Less Than Fair Value, and Affirmative Final the dumping margins calculated for all the PRC-wide rate, as adjusted for Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 77 U.S. sales to the importer- (or customer) export subsidies and estimated domestic FR 63791 (October 17, 2012). Because no party has and dividing this amount by the total subsidy pass-through. Additionally, provided information on the record of the review pursuant to this refinement, if the contradicting this determination, the Department entered value of the sales to the has continued to treat these companies as a single importer- (or customer).51 Where the Department determines that an exporter entity for purposes of this review. Department calculated an importer- (or under review had no shipments of the 49 The PRC-wide entity includes the following customer)-specific weighted-average subject merchandise, any suspended companies: (1) Shanghai Suntech; (2) Wuxi entries that entered under that Sunshine; (3) Changzhou NESL Solartech Co., Ltd.; dumping margin by dividing the total (4) CSG PVTech Co., Ltd.; (5) Era Solar Co., Ltd.; amount of dumping for reviewed sales exporter’s case number will be (6) Innovosolar; (7) Jiangsu Sunlink PV Technology to the importer- (or customer) by the liquidated at the PRC-wide rate, as Co., Ltd.; (8) Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd.; (9) Jinko total sales quantity associated with adjusted for export subsidies and Solar Co., Ltd.; (10) LDK Solar Hi-tech (Suzhou) estimated domestic subsidy pass- Co., Ltd.; (11) Leye Photovoltaic Science Tech.; (12) those transactions, the Department will Magi Solar Technology; (13) Ningbo ETDZ direct CBP to assess importer- (or through. Holdings, Ltd.; (14) ReneSola; (15) Shanghai customer)-specific assessment rates Machinery Complete Equipment (Group) Corp., Cash Deposit Requirements based on the resulting per-unit rates.52 Ltd.; (16) Shenglong PV-Tech; (17) Solarbest The following cash deposit Energy-Tech (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.; (18) Suzhou Where an importer- (or customer)- requirements will be effective upon Shenglong PV–TECH Co., Ltd.; (19) Zhejiang specific ad valorem or per-unit rate is publication of the final results of this Shuqimeng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd.; (20) greater than de minimis, the Department Zhejiang Xinshun Guangfu Science and Technology administrative review for shipments of will instruct CBP to collect the Co., Ltd.; (21) Zhejiang ZG-Cells Co., Ltd.; (22) the subject merchandise from the PRC Zhiheng Solar Inc.; and (23) LDK Hi-Tech appropriate duties at the time of (Nanchang Co., Ltd. In addition, the PRC-wide liquidation. Where either the entity includes the companies listed in Appendix 53 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of II of the notice Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic respondent’s weighted average dumping the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules margin is zero or de minimis, or an Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty From the People’s Republic of China: Amended importer (or customer-) specific ad Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty valorem or per-unit rate is zero or de (February 14, 2012). Administrative Review, 79 FR 43713 (July 28, 2014). 54 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 50 This PRC-wide entity rate equals the PRC-wide Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 entity rate of 249.96% adjusted for export subsidies 51 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion and estimated domestic subsidy pass-through. 52 Id. of this practice.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Jul 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM 14JYN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 134 / Tuesday, July 14, 2015 / Notices 41003

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, We are issuing these results of Comment 30. Surrogate Value for Quartz for consumption on or after the administrative review and publishing Crucibles publication date of this notice in the notice in accordance with sections Comment 31. Surrogate Value for Junction Federal Register, as provided by section 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Boxes Comment 32. Differential Pricing 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the Dated: July 7, 2015. Comment 33. Surrogate Value for the exporters listed above, the cash deposit Paul Piquado, Polysilicon Feedstock and Solar Cell rate will be the rate listed for each Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Offsets exporter in the table in the ‘‘Final Compliance. Comment 34. Surrogate Value for Semi- Results’’ section of this notice; (2) for finished Polysilicon Ingots and Blocks previously investigated PRC and non- Appendix—Issues and Decision Comment 35. Surrogate Value for PRC exporters that received a separate Memorandum Aluminum Angle Keys Comment 36. Surrogate Value for rate in a prior segment of this Summary proceeding, the cash deposit rate will Aluminum Frames Background Comment 37. Indirect Selling Expenses continue to be the existing exporter- Scope of the Order Comment 38. Application of a By-Product Treatment of Wuxi Suntech, Luoyang specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of Recovery Cap on Recycled Paste Suntech, Shanghai Suntech, and Wuxi subject merchandise that have not been Comment 39. Whether the Department Sunshine found to be entitled to a separate rate, Improperly Calculated the Partial AFA Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the Act the cash deposit rate will be the rate Rate Applied to Yingli previously established for the PRC-wide for Wuxi Suntech Discussion of the Issues Comment 40. Whether to Exclude Certain entity; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters Comment 1. Rescission of the Reviews of Reported CEP Sales of subject merchandise which have not JingAo Solar Co., Ltd. and Shanghai JA Comment 41. Wuxi Suntech Separate Rate received their own rate, the cash deposit Solar PV Technology Co., Ltd. Status rate will be the rate applicable to the Comment 2. Treatment of ERA Solar Co., Comment 42. The Department’s Separate PRC exporter that supplied that non- Ltd. Rates Practice in AD Proceedings Involving the PRC PRC exporter. These deposit Comment 3. PRC-Wide Entity Rate requirements, when imposed, shall Comment 4. Assessment of Entries Made [FR Doc. 2015–17238 Filed 7–13–15; 8:45 am] remain in effect until further notice. Prior to the International Trade BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Commission’s Final Determination Disclosure Comment 5. Treatment of Jiangsu Sunlink PV Technology Co., Ltd. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE We intend to disclose the calculations Comment 6. Treatment of CSG PVTech Co., performed for these final results of Ltd. International Trade Administration review within five days of the date of Comment 7. Treatment of Leye publication of this notice in the Federal Photovoltaic Science & Technology Co. [C–570–980] Register in accordance with 19 CFR Ltd. 351.224(b). Comment 8. Rescission of Review of LDK Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Solar Hi-Tech (Nanchang) Co., Ltd. Whether or Not Assembled Into Notification to Importers Regarding the Comment 9. Whether to Apply Adverse Reimbursement of Duties Facts Available (‘‘AFA’’) to Two Modules, From the People’s Republic Unreported Yingli Sales of China: Final Results of This notice also serves as a final Comment 10. Unreported FOPs by Countervailing Duty Administrative reminder to importers of their Suppliers and Tollers Review; 2012 responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) Comment 11. Surrogate Value for Cutting to file a certificate regarding the Wire AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, reimbursement of antidumping duties Comment 12. Surrogate Value for International Trade Administration, prior to liquidation of the relevant Aluminum-Silver Paste Department of Commerce. entries during this POR. Failure to Comment 13. Surrogate Value for Silver SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce comply with this requirement could Paste (the Department) has completed its result in the Secretary’s presumption Comment 14. Surrogate Value for Unclassified Stores administrative review of the that reimbursement of antidumping Comment 15. Ocean Freight countervailing duty (CVD) order on duties has occurred and the subsequent Comment 16. Brokerage and Handling crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, assessment of double antidumping Comment 17. Labor Calculation whether or not assembled into modules duties. Comment 18. Surrogate Value for Natural (solar cells), from the People’s Republic Gas of China (the PRC) for the period of Administrative Protective Order Comment 19. Surrogate Value for Nitric (‘‘APO’’) review (POR) covering March 26, 2012, Acid through December 31, 2012. On January Comment 20. Surrogate Value for This notice also serves as a reminder 8, 2015, we published the preliminary to parties subject to APO of their Hydrofluoric Acid Comment 21. Application of Surrogate results of this review and the post- responsibility concerning the return or Marine Insurance Rate preliminary results were completed on destruction of proprietary information Comment 22. Conversion Factor for April 21, 2015.1 disclosed under APO in accordance Natural Gas with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues Comment 23. Movement Expenses for 1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, to govern business proprietary Yingli’s EP Sale Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the information in this segment of the Comment 24. Surrogate Value for People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Backsheet Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2012; proceeding. Timely written notification and Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty of the return or destruction of APO Comment 25. Calculation of Surrogate Financial Profit Ratio Administrative Review, 80 FR 1019 (January 8, 2015) (Preliminary Results); see also Department materials, or conversion to judicial Comment 26. Gross Unit Price Adjustments protective order, is hereby requested. Memorandum, ‘‘Post-Preliminary Analysis in the Comment 27. Surrogate Value for Wafers Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Failure to comply with the regulations Comment 28. Export Subsidy Adjustment Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or and terms of an APO is a violation Comment 29. By-Product Offset for Broken Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People’s which is subject to sanction. Wafers Continued

VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:09 Jul 13, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM 14JYN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES