DOCSLIB.ORG

Surrey Heath Core Strategy and Development Management Policies Habitat Regulations Assessment of the Proposed Submission DPD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Surrey Heath Core Strategy and Development Management Policies Habitat Regulations Assessment of the Proposed Submission DPD Surrey Heath Core Strategy and Development Management Policies Habitat Regulations Assessment of the Proposed Submission DPD Report August 2010 Prepared for Surrey Heath Borough Council Surrey Heath Borough Council Core Strategy and Development Management Policies DPD Revision Schedule Habitat Regulations Assessment August 2010 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 21st July Draft Report Dr Graeme Down Dr James Riley Dr Jo Hughes 2010 Ecologist Principal Ecologist Technical Director (Ecology) 02 2nd August Final report for Dr Graeme Down Dr James Riley Dr Jo Hughes 2010 consultation Ecologist Principal Ecologist Technical Director (Ecology) Scott Wilson Scott House Alencon Link Basingstoke This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. Scott Wilson Hampshire accepts no liability for any use of this document other than for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in RG21 7PP part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document Tel 01256 310200 as a whole. The contents of this document do not provide legal or tax advice or opinion. Fax 01256 310201 © Scott Wilson Ltd 2010 www.scottwilson.com Surrey Heath Borough Council Core Strategy and Development Management Policies DPD Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background to the Project ................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Current Legislation ........................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Scope of the Project ......................................................................................................... 7 1.4 This report ........................................................................................................................ 8 2 Methodology ..................................................................................... 9 2.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 HRA Task 1 - Likely Significant Effects (LSE).................................................................. 9 2.3 Appropriate Assessment and Mitigation......................................................................... 10 2.4 Confirming other plans and projects that may act in combination.................................. 11 3 Pathways of impact........................................................................ 14 3.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 14 3.2 Urbanisation ................................................................................................................... 14 3.3 Recreational pressure .................................................................................................... 15 3.4 Atmospheric pollution ..................................................................................................... 17 3.5 Water abstraction ........................................................................................................... 23 3.6 Water Quality.................................................................................................................. 24 3.7 Summary of Screening................................................................................................... 24 4 Thames Basin Heaths SPA............................................................ 26 4.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 26 4.2 Features of European Interest........................................................................................ 26 4.3 Historic Trends and Current Conditions ......................................................................... 27 4.4 Key environmental conditions ........................................................................................ 27 4.5 Potential effects of the plan ............................................................................................ 28 4.6 Conclusion......................................................................................................................34 5 Thursley, Ash, Pirbright and Chobham SAC ............................... 35 5.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 35 5.2 Features of European interest........................................................................................ 35 5.3 Historic Trends and Current Conditions ......................................................................... 36 5.4 Key environmental conditions ........................................................................................ 37 5.5 Potential effects of the plan ............................................................................................ 37 5.6 Conclusion......................................................................................................................44 Surrey Heath Borough Council Core Strategy and Development Management Policies DPD 6 Windsor Forest and Great Park SAC ............................................ 45 6.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 45 6.2 Features of European interest........................................................................................ 45 6.3 Historic Trends and Current Conditions ......................................................................... 45 6.4 Key environmental conditions ........................................................................................ 45 6.5 Potential effects of the plan ............................................................................................ 45 6.6 Conclusion......................................................................................................................47 7 South West London Waterbodies SPA and Ramsar ................... 48 7.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 48 7.2 Features of European Interest........................................................................................ 48 7.3 Historic Trends and Current Condition ........................................................................... 48 7.4 Key Environmental Conditions ....................................................................................... 49 7.5 Potential effects of the plan ............................................................................................ 49 7.6 Conclusion......................................................................................................................50 8 Thursley, Hankley and Frensham Commons SPA ...................... 51 8.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 51 8.2 Reasons for Designation ................................................................................................ 51 8.3 Historical and Current Pressures ................................................................................... 51 8.4 Key Environmental Conditions ....................................................................................... 51 8.5 Potential effects of the plan ............................................................................................ 52 8.6 Conclusion......................................................................................................................55 9 Thursley and Ockley Bogs Ramsar .............................................. 56 9.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 56 9.2 Features of European Interest........................................................................................ 56 9.3 Historical Trends and Current Pressures ....................................................................... 56 9.4 Key Environmental Conditions ....................................................................................... 57 9.5 Potential effects of the plan ............................................................................................ 57 9.6 Conclusion......................................................................................................................57 10 Mole Gap to Reigate Escarpment SAC......................................... 58 10.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 58 10.2 Features of European Interest........................................................................................ 58 10.3 Historical Trends and Current Pressures ....................................................................... 58 10.4 Key Environmental Conditions ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taking Britain Further Heathrow’S Plan for Connecting the UK to Growth
    VOLUME 1 Taking Britain further Heathrow’s plan for connecting the UK to growth #BritainsHeathrow Disclaimer This document has been prepared by Heathrow Airport Limited solely in response to an invitation from the Airports Commission. It should not be used for any other purpose or in any other context and Heathrow Airport Limited accepts no responsibility for its use in that regard Contents Volume 1 - Technical submission Contents ........................................................................................................................ 3 Foreword ....................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 11 Connecting for growth ................................................................................................................... 12 Listening to what our stakeholders say ........................................................................................... 18 Our vision for a world-class hub airport ........................................................................................... 20 Connecting all of the UK ................................................................................................................ 24 Building a sustainable Heathrow ..................................................................................................... 29 The deliverable solution .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WSP Group Plc a FIGURE 7.1 40393
    Key 2116 Links For Assessment 1006 3083 ± 3121 1005 3513 3508 3611 3507 2004 3612 3516 3030 3517 3509 3510 1037 3081 3514 2023 2005 3506 3503 1004 3506 2022 2006 3515 3080 2003 1038 3072 3511 3079 3502 3505 3084 1031 3077 3603 3504 2002 3007 3073 3518 3530 3605 3520 2112 2007 3533 3519 3034 3604 3607 1032 2024 3078 3071 3087 3531 3534 3537 2111 3086 3536 3532 3538 2110 3085 3576 3540 3577 3076 3523 3602 2025 3541 3524 2001 3024 3539 3544 3088 3570 3002 1003 3068 3546 3555 3545 3571 3551 3552 3063 3559 3573 3550 1039 3558 3547 3075 3554 3543 1002 3553 3205 3001 3549 3074 3205 3062 3535 3525 3548 1040 3067 3031 3601 3574 2129 3069 3542 1041 3572 3526 1030 3107 3103 3070 3066 3204 3203 3557 3556 1042 3210 3207 3575 3208 3209 3106 3101 3089 3064 3105 3211 3027 3090 3212 1001 3213 3093 3214 3102 3065 3561 3563 3560 3100 3562 3564 3215 3529 3600 3216 2108 3567 3006 2107 3528 3217 1034 3219 3094 3218 3104 3220 3092 1033 3610 3098 3003 3096 3008 3009 3221 3095 3109 1008 3609 3608 3108 3004 3099 3113 3112 3025 3005 3566 The map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission 3565 3135 of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of HMSO. © Crown Copyright.3130 Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Wokingham Borough Council Licence Number 100019592 PROJECT: SCALE @ A3: CHECKED: APPROVED: 1:12,500 VN JF Whitehill & Bordon Relief Road FILE: DES-DRN: DATE: CLIENT: FIGURE 7.1 GH FEB 2014 Hampshire County Council PROJECT No: DRAWING No: REV: Mountbatten House, Basing View Westbrook
    [Show full text]
  • 1St – 31St May 2021 Welcome
    ALTON Walking & Cycling Festival 1st – 31st May 2021 Welcome... Key: to Alton Town Councils walking and cycling festival. We are delighted that Walking experience isn’t necessary for this year’s festival is able to go ahead and that we are able to offer a range Easy: these as distances are relatively short and paths and of walks and cycle rides that will suit not only the more experienced enthusiast gradients generally easy. These walks will be taken but also provide a welcome introduction to either walking or cycling, or both! at a relaxed pace, often stopping briefly at places of Alton Town Council would like wish to thank this year’s main sponsor, interest and may be suitable for family groups. the Newbury Buiding Society and all of the volunteers who have put together a programme to promote, share and develop walking and cycling in Moderate: These walks follow well defined paths and tracks, though they may be steep in places. They and around Alton. should be suitable for most people of average fitness. Please Note: Harder: These walks are more demanding and We would remind all participants that they must undertake a self-assessment there will be some steep climbs and/or sustained for Covid 19 symptoms and no-one should be participating in a walk or cylcle ascent and descent and rough terrain. These walks ride if they, or someone they live with, or have recently been in close contact are more suitable for those with a good level of with have displayed any symptoms. fitness and stamina.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer.Doc Revised from 10/03/02
    Save No. 91 Printed 10/03/02 10:33 AM Gazetteer.doc Revised From 10/03/02 Gazetteer compiled by E J Wiseman Abbots Ann SU 3243 Bighton Lane Watercress Beds SU 5933 Abbotstone Down SU 5836 Bishop's Dyke SU 3405 Acres Down SU 2709 Bishopstoke SU 4619 Alice Holt Forest SU 8042 Bishops Sutton Watercress Beds SU 6031 Allbrook SU 4521 Bisterne SU 1400 Allington Lane Gravel Pit SU 4717 Bitterne (Southampton) SU 4413 Alresford Watercress Beds SU 5833 Bitterne Park (Southampton) SU 4414 Alresford Pond SU 5933 Black Bush SU 2515 Amberwood Inclosure SU 2013 Blackbushe Airfield SU 8059 Amery Farm Estate (Alton) SU 7240 Black Dam (Basingstoke) SU 6552 Ampfield SU 4023 Black Gutter Bottom SU 2016 Andover Airfield SU 3245 Blackmoor SU 7733 Anton valley SU 3740 Blackmoor Golf Course SU 7734 Arlebury Lake SU 5732 Black Point (Hayling Island) SZ 7599 Ashlett Creek SU 4603 Blashford Lakes SU 1507 Ashlett Mill Pond SU 4603 Blendworth SU 7113 Ashley Farm (Stockbridge) SU 3730 Bordon SU 8035 Ashley Manor (Stockbridge) SU 3830 Bossington SU 3331 Ashley Walk SU 2014 Botley Wood SU 5410 Ashley Warren SU 4956 Bourley Reservoir SU 8250 Ashmansworth SU 4157 Boveridge SU 0714 Ashurst SU 3310 Braishfield SU 3725 Ash Vale Gravel Pit SU 8853 Brambridge SU 4622 Avington SU 5332 Bramley Camp SU 6559 Avon Castle SU 1303 Bramshaw Wood SU 2516 Avon Causeway SZ 1497 Bramshill (Warren Heath) SU 7759 Avon Tyrrell SZ 1499 Bramshill Common SU 7562 Backley Plain SU 2106 Bramshill Police College Lake SU 7560 Baddesley Common SU 3921 Bramshill Rubbish Tip SU 7561 Badnam Creek (River
    [Show full text]
  • South Downs Integrated Landscape Character Assessment
    K2 D4a H6 J1 E4 L3 D3a C1 A5 N1 H6 O1 D3a O2 E4 D1b K1 D2a L2 L2 M1 N1 L2 E3 N1 D1a D2b D2b H5 M1 M1 D2b L2 J2 L2 D2b K1 H4 D2b B2 L1 D2a P1 F4 I3 D2a I3 P1 B3 E1 H3 B1 E2 A3 G4 G4 Q1 Q1 Landscape Character Areas Q1 Q1 D1a South Winchester Downland Mosaic (Enclosed) B4 D1b South Winchester Downland Mosaic (Open) D2a Hambledon and Clanfield Downland Mosaic (Enclosed) D2b Hambledon and Clanfield Downland Mosaic (Open) D3a Bramdean and Cheriton Downland Mosaic (Enclosed) D4a Newton Valence Downland Mosaic (Enclosed) D: Downland Mosaic K2 H6 J1 E4 D4a L3 D3a C1 A5 N1 H6 O1 D3a O2 E4 D1b K1 D2a L2 L2 M1 N1 L2 E3 N1 D1a D2b D2b H5 M1 M1 D2b L2 J2 L2 D2b K1 H4 D2b B2 L1 D2a P1 F4 I3 D2a I3 P1 B3 E1 H3 E2 B1 A3 G4 G4 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Historic Landscape Character B4 Fieldscapes Woodland Unenclosed Valley Floor Designed Landscapes 0101-Fieldscapes Assarts 0201-Post 1800 Woodland 04-Unenclosed 06-Valley Floor 09-Designed Landscapes 0102-Early Enclosures 0202- Pre1800 Woodland Settlement Industry Military 0103- Recent Enclosures Horticulture 0501- Pre 1800 Settlement 08-Industry 10-Military 0104-Modern Fields 03-Horticulture 0502- Post 1800 Expansion Recreation Settlement 13-Recreation D: Downland Mosaic LANDSCAPE TYPE D: DOWNLAND MOSAIC D.1 The Downland Mosaic landscape type comprises an area of chalk downland at the western end of the South Downs, forming part of a broad area of chalk downland which extends westwards beyond Winchester to the Dorset Downs and Salisbury Plain, and north to Basingstoke.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural England Standard A4 Word Template
    European Site Conservation Objectives: Supplementary advice on conserving and restoring site features East Hampshire Hangers Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Site Code: UK0012723 Photo credit: Peter Wakely, Natural England/Flickr Date of Publication: 11 February 2019 Page 1 of 31 About this document This document provides Natural England’s supplementary advice about the European Site Conservation Objectives relating to East Hampshire Hangers SAC. This advice should therefore be read together with the SAC Conservation Objectives available here. You should use the Conservation Objectives, this Supplementary Advice and any case-specific advice given by Natural England, when developing, proposing or assessing an activity, plan or project that may affect this site. This Supplementary Advice to the Conservation Objectives presents attributes which are ecological characteristics of the designated species and habitats within a site. The listed attributes are considered to be those that best describe the site’s ecological integrity and which, if safeguarded, will enable achievement of the Conservation Objectives. Each attribute has a target which is either quantified or qualitative depending on the available evidence. The target identifies as far as possible the desired state to be achieved for the attribute. The tables provided below bring together the findings of the best available scientific evidence relating to the site’s qualifying features, which may be updated or supplemented in further publications from Natural England and other sources. The local evidence used in preparing this supplementary advice has been cited. The references to the national evidence used are available on request. Where evidence and references have not been indicated, Natural England has applied ecological knowledge and expert judgement.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2A: Biodiversity Audit
    Biodiversity Action Plan for East Hampshire Section 2a: Biodiversity Audit Section 2: Biodiversity Data - 1 - Biodiversity Action Plan for East Hampshire Introduction Biodiversity in East Hampshire is currently, and has been for centuries, extremely varied, due to the diverse geology and ancient history of natural and human processes occurring on the land. The district’s landscapes and the habitats and species they host are outlined in Section 1. Given below is a more detailed account of the extent, distribution and condition of the district’s biodiversity, using the best available knowledge. Habitats Shown below are maps of the district, showing each habitat type – these are derived from a county-wide programme to assess habitat types, using data held by Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre. Also at county-wide level are A Biodiversity Action Plan for Hampshire’s Habitat Action Plans (HAPs) (www.hampshirebiodiversity.org.uk/vol-two.html ). These plans outline priority actions for each habitat type, which have been translated into district-level action in Section 3 through consultation with partners. • All mapped habitats correspond with the Priority Habitats in A Biodiversity Action Plan for Hampshire except: o Arable o Improved Grassland o Coniferous woodland o Urban The maps show that Hampshire’s priority habitats such as calcareous grassland are fragmented and small in area compared to agricultural and urban land uses, but that these fragments correspond to the familiar landscapes in the district such as chalk downland. Other habitat types, such as the mosaic of Wealden heathland and acidic grasslands in the north-east of the area, are larger and in closer proximity to each other.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Duncton to Bignor Escarpment SAC
    Submitted to Client: Submitted by: South Downs National Park AECOM Authority Midpoint Alençon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment July 2018 AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page ii Prepared by: Isla Hoffmann Heap Checked by: Dr James Riley Senior Ecologist Technical Director Approved by: Dr James Riley Associate Director Rev No Comments Checked Approved Date by by 0 DRAFT IHH JR 05/05/17 1 Following client comments IHH JR 30/06/17 2 Incorporating air quality impact assessment IHH JR 01/08/17 3 Updated to address Pre-Submission Local Plan and IHH JR 13/09/17 incorporate air quality analysis for Ashdown Forest SAC 4 Update to reflect Consultation Comments and policy update IHH JR 16/03/18 5 New report produced in response to Sweetman European MK JR 24/07/18 Court of Justice ruling Midpoint, Alençon Link, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7PP, United Kingdom Telephone: 01256 310 200 Website: http://www.aecom.com July 2018 Limitations South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations July 2018 Assessment AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page iii AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the South Downs National Park Authority (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report
    Winchester City Council Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report Final report Prepared by LUC July 2020 Winchester City Council Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report Project Number 11113 Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Draft for client comment K. Sydney T. Livingston T. Livingston 26.06.2020 2. Final for consultation K. Sydney T. Livingston T. Livingston 07.07.2020 Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning Lancaster Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning London 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment Manchester London SE1 8UL Landscape Planning & Assessment Landscape Management landuse.co.uk 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents Winchester District Local Plan HRA Scoping Report July 2020 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Background to the Local Plan 1 The requirement to undertake Habitats Regulations Assessment of Development Plans 2 Stages of HRA 2 Recent case law changes 4 Previous HRA work 5 Structure of this report 5 Chapter 2 Approach to HRA 6 Screening methodology 6 Appropriate Assessment 9 Chapter 3 Scope of HRA 11 European sites that may be affected by the Local Plan 11 Potential broad impacts from the Local Plan 18 Chapter 4 Next Steps 21 Appendix A Attributes of European Sites with the potential to be affected by the Local Plan A-1 Appendix B Other plans and projects with the potential for in-combination effects B-1 LUC I i -Chapter 1 Introduction Winchester District Local Plan HRA Scoping Report July 2020 Chapter 1 Introduction An introduction to Habitats Regulations Assessment and the Winchester District Local Plan LUC has been commissioned by Winchester City Council to carry out a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) of its emerging Local Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Selborne Selborne
    Selborne Selborne 1.0 PARISH Selborne 2.0 HUNDRED Selborne 3.0 NGR 474100 133800 4.0 GEOLOGY Upper Greensand; Lower Chalk adjacent to the west. 5.0 SITE CONTEXT (Map 2) Selborne is situated on the B3006, south of its bridging point on the Oakhanger Stream and on the lower slopes (east) of Selborne Common. The Oakhanger Stream rises from springs on the lower slope of Noar Hill to the south of the settlement, and 1km west of the church below Selborne Common. The Common rises to 200m AOD, whilst the parish church is sited just above the Stream at c. 121m AOD. The settlement is linear in appearance spreading southwards from the church for almost a kilometre. To the south- east, C19 and C20 development has spread into the meadowland between the Selborne Road and the stream. 6.0 PLAN TYPE & DESCRIPTION (Maps 3, 4 & 5) Agglomeration + regular row + irregular rows + common edge Selborne is a settlement of many components. Within the whole it offers the greatest diversity of rural settlement type in East Hampshire District. 6.1 Agglomeration the parish church of St Mary is at the north end of Selborne, set back a little to the east of the principal thoroughfare known as Selborne Road. The church is in a commanding position, overlooking the Oakhanger Stream 100m north, whilst to the west it looks down upon a four-way junction on the Selborne Road. The association of church with road junction is typical of many East Hampshire settlements though in the case of Selborne at least two of these routes have been re-directed since the Medieval period.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues & Options Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA)
    LOCAL PLAN INTEGRATED IMPACT ASSESSMENT (IIA) Scoping report | Stage A Consultation Draft | February 2018 Contents Draft Local Plan Integrated Impact Assessment (IIA) Scoping Report .................................................................................................................. 1 Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Brent’s Local Plan ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 3. The Integrated Impact Assessment Approach ............................................................................................................................................ 16 4. Identifying relevant plans, programmes and policies ................................................................................................................................... 18 5. Key Sustainable Issues and Opportunities.................................................................................................................................................. 27 6. Developing the IIA framework ....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 05: Water Quality and Hydro-Ecology Assessment
    Heathrow Airport Limited Heathrow’s North-West Runway Water Quality and Hydro-ecology Assessment 16 June 2014 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 5 Copyright and Non-Disclosure Notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by AMEC (©AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 2014). save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by AMEC under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of AMEC. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Third-Party Disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by AMEC at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is able to access it by any means. AMEC excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report.
    [Show full text]