Seinfeld: a Show About Economics and Irrationality

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seinfeld: a Show About Economics and Irrationality The Review: A Journal of Undergraduate Student Research Volume 14 Article 6 2013 Seinfeld: A Show about Economics and Irrationality Josh Sufilka St. John Fisher College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/ur Part of the Economics Commons, and the Television Commons How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited ou?y Recommended Citation Sufilka, Josh. "Seinfeld: A Show about Economics and Irrationality." The Review: A Journal of Undergraduate Student Research 14 (2013): 27-30. Web. [date of access]. <https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/ur/ vol14/iss1/6>. This document is posted at https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/ur/vol14/iss1/6 and is brought to you for free and open access by Fisher Digital Publications at St. John Fisher College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Seinfeld: A Show about Economics and Irrationality Abstract The show Seinfeld is much more than a show about nothing. In each episode, unnoticed by the average viewer, common principles of economics are being presented. However, these principles are being presented in a way that differs from the typical neoclassical economic view, which is every person makes rational decisions. This paper questions the view of the writers, Jerry Seinfeld and Larry David, on their understanding of human behavior. More importantly, by focusing on two episodes, this paper argues that people do not always make rational decisions and as a result, questions neoclassical economics as a whole. This article is available in The Review: A Journal of Undergraduate Student Research: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/ur/ vol14/iss1/6 Sufilka: Seinfeld: A Show about Economics and Irrationality Seinfeld: A Show about Economics and Irrationality Josh Sufilka Economics can be found in the most good outweigh the costs” (Mateer 216). This unlikely of places. For instance, after dinner definition does not need to be applied to you sit down to relax and absorb some large scale decisions that affect huge quality television. After many minutes of populations, meaning this definition can channel surfing, you ultimately decide to apply to individual decisions. For example, watch the show Seinfeld. Although the show if a person is deciding to drink alcohol with is known for its comedy, there may be his friends one night, he has to decide if the something hidden in the show unnoticed by benefits outweigh the costs. The benefits the common viewer. Unknowingly you are could be the enjoyment of spending time being presented with principles of with his friends and the costs could be a economics. However, those economic hangover or negative externalities resulting principles are being presented in a way that from the drinking. Based on the principle, may be different than the typical the rational decision an individual makes neoclassical economics principles which should consist of the benefits outweighing supports the theory that all human beings the costs; otherwise the decision would be make rational decisions. The show was irrational. This is where Seinfeld differs primarily written by Jerry Seinfeld and because the show’s characters tend to make Larry David, meaning the show was highly decisions where the costs outweigh the influenced by their view and understanding benefits. of the world. Thus, the economics presented Economic principles were present in the show may reflect their understanding throughout all nine seasons of Seinfeld and of the economic principles and may be numerous episodes would be great examples different than the typical neoclassical of those principles. “The Engagement” understanding. Two economic principles the episode is a perfect demonstration of cost- show consistently contained throughout the benefit analysis. In the episode, a dog living series are cost-benefit analysis and in the courtyard across the street from opportunity cost. However, those principles Elaine’s apartment keeps her up all night are not presented the way a neoclassical barking and causing problems. She decides economist would present them since they to take measures into her own hands, with believe all humans are naturally rational and help from Kramer and Newman, by will always make the rational choice. kidnapping the dog and releasing it far from Because Seinfeld is influenced by the the courtyard in the country. As a result, the opinions of the writers, the show presents dog returns home and Elaine, Kramer, and views of economics differently than typical Newman are caught by the police for economic understanding by having the dognapping. characters make irrational decisions and The cost-benefit analysis principle choices where the costs outweigh the applies to Elaine’s situation. Elaine was benefits. presented with a situation where she had to An economic principle that people make an important decision. The dog was use every day without realizing it is cost- causing many negative externalities which benefit analysis. Cost-benefit analysis is means society was being affected by the defined as “a process used to determine dog’s actions and the removal of the dog whether the benefits of providing a public would make everything better. Elaine’s 27 Published by Fisher Digital Publications, 2013 1 The Review: A Journal of Undergraduate Student Research, Vol. 14 [2013], Art. 6 decision to kidnap the dog presented many same as Jerry’s, but he makes a different costs and benefits. The costs of kidnapping decision. He believes the benefits outweigh the dog would be guilt, the possibility of the costs and asks Susan, his girlfriend, to being arrested, and the possibility of being marry him. Although he makes a more injured during the process of kidnapping the rational decision than Jerry, he quickly dog. On the other hand, the benefits of regrets it and becomes jealous of Jerry’s removing the dog would be health benefits, singleness. Since he regrets getting married, such as more sleep. Based on those facts, the George ultimately is doing the same thing as costs outweighed the benefits, and the Jerry by wanting to remain single. The rational thing would have been to not kidnap desire to remain single does not make sense the dog and to figure out another solution. based on their reasons and cost-benefit This means that the economic principle in analysis, so this is another example how the episode differs from traditional Seinfeld’s principles stray from the neoclassical economic principles because neoclassical viewpoint. A neoclassical Elaine would have made the rational economist would have approached this decision based on cost-benefit analysis. If differently as well. He would have noticed this situation presented itself to a more benefits (using the same reasons as neoclassical economist, he would have dealt George and Jerry) and would have decided with it differently. After performing the that marriage was a better decision than cost-benefit analysis, he would have realized remaining single. The neoclassical view that the costs outweighed the benefits and clearly differs from the view presented in would not have kidnapped the dog. He Seinfeld. would have gone with a more rational Decision making plays an important decision, such as purchasing ear plugs or part in Seinfeld and there are always many continuing to complain to the police. Based factors and variables that come into play on Elaine’s situation, Seinfeld does not when making a decision. The most difficult present the economic principle like a aspect about making a decision is that you neoclassical economist would present it and are ultimately giving up something to do possibly shows a flaw in regards to another thing. The thing you finally decide neoclassical economics: humans do not not to do will become your opportunity cost. always make the rational decision. Opportunity cost is defined as “the highest In the same episode, Jerry and valued alternative that must be sacrificed in George are presented with cost-benefit order to get something else” (Mateer 13). analysis in regard to marriage. The two Although most people do not know the characters consider the costs and benefits of principle, it actually plays a huge part in marriage, but Jerry does not have the same their lives. When a decision is being made, analysis as George. For Jerry, the costs of the biggest question the individual should marriage are plentiful, such as not being able ask himself is which choice will give him to do what he wants because of his wife. the greatest benefit. The choice that provides Conversely, the benefits would be caring for the least amount of benefit should become someone, considering himself a “man,” and the opportunity cost. For example, you are all the great additions that result from trying to decide if you should watch the marriage. However, Jerry ultimately decides football game on the television or cut the to remain single, which is irrational because grass in your yard. If you decide that cutting the benefits outweigh the costs. For George, the grass is more important, the opportunity the costs and benefits of marriage are the cost would be watching the football game. 28 https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/ur/vol14/iss1/6 2 Sufilka: Seinfeld: A Show about Economics and Irrationality Seinfeld relates to this principle because out. Jerry’s primary concern is the movie, throughout the show the characters are and he suggests they just go to the theater always making decisions which would result and eat food there. Jerry was also supposed in opportunity costs. However, the to go visit his sick uncle instead of seeing characters tend to make irrational decisions the movie. All of these examples have and the rational decision actually becomes opportunity costs; however, they make the opportunity cost which conflicts with the irrational decisions and the opportunity costs neoclassical economics system. would actually have been better choices. For Opportunity cost, the other economic instance, a neoclassical economist would principle heavily presented throughout have made different choices.
Recommended publications
  • 30 Rock: Complexity, Metareferentiality and the Contemporary Quality Sitcom
    30 Rock: Complexity, Metareferentiality and the Contemporary Quality Sitcom Katrin Horn When the sitcom 30 Rock first aired in 2006 on NBC, the odds were against a renewal for a second season. Not only was it pitched against another new show with the same “behind the scenes”-idea, namely the drama series Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. 30 Rock’s often absurd storylines, obscure references, quick- witted dialogues, and fast-paced punch lines furthermore did not make for easy consumption, and thus the show failed to attract a sizeable amount of viewers. While Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip did not become an instant success either, it still did comparatively well in the Nielson ratings and had the additional advantage of being a drama series produced by a household name, Aaron Sorkin1 of The West Wing (NBC, 1999-2006) fame, at a time when high-quality prime-time drama shows were dominating fan and critical debates about TV. Still, in a rather surprising programming decision NBC cancelled the drama series, renewed the comedy instead and later incorporated 30 Rock into its Thursday night line-up2 called “Comedy Night Done Right.”3 Here the show has been aired between other single-camera-comedy shows which, like 30 Rock, 1 | Aaron Sorkin has aEntwurf short cameo in “Plan B” (S5E18), in which he meets Liz Lemon as they both apply for the same writing job: Liz: Do I know you? Aaron: You know my work. Walk with me. I’m Aaron Sorkin. The West Wing, A Few Good Men, The Social Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Junior Mints and Their Bigger Than Bite-Size Role in Complicating Product Placement Assumptions
    Salve Regina University Digital Commons @ Salve Regina Pell Scholars and Senior Theses Salve's Dissertations and Theses 5-2010 Junior Mints and Their Bigger Than Bite-Size Role in Complicating Product Placement Assumptions Stephanie Savage Salve Regina University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/pell_theses Part of the Advertising and Promotion Management Commons, and the Marketing Commons Savage, Stephanie, "Junior Mints and Their Bigger Than Bite-Size Role in Complicating Product Placement Assumptions" (2010). Pell Scholars and Senior Theses. 54. https://digitalcommons.salve.edu/pell_theses/54 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Salve's Dissertations and Theses at Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pell Scholars and Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Salve Regina. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Savage 1 “Who’s gonna turn down a Junior Mint? It’s chocolate, it’s peppermint ─it’s delicious!” While this may sound like your typical television commercial, you can thank Jerry Seinfeld and his butter fingers for what is actually one of the most renowned lines in television history. As part of a 1993 episode of Seinfeld , subsequently known as “The Junior Mint,” these infamous words have certainly gained a bit more attention than the show’s writers had originally bargained for. In fact, those of you who were annoyed by last year’s focus on a McDonald’s McFlurry on NBC’s 30 Rock may want to take up your beef with Seinfeld’s producers for supposedly showing marketers the way to the future ("Brand Practice: Product Integration Is as Old as Hollywood Itself").
    [Show full text]
  • Which Seinfeld Character Are You?
    EPISODE 181: THE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MEETING WHICHWHICH SEINFELDSEINFELD CHARACTERCHARACTER AREARE YOU?YOU? In our business dealings, we are often guilty of just not listening. We come to the table with an agenda—a new product, a new service—and wait while a prospect or existing client tells us what’s going on with his or her business. At some point, that person will pause—and we pounce with our spiel. This approach rarely works - successful business development requires some level of rapport and relationship building. As in all aspects of life, this can mean dealing with those who may not share your views or approach. In order to adapt quickly and improvise in these instances, it’s helpful to understand people’s communication and personality styles. There are a number of tests that can help us understand the personality and communication styles of others, including the popular DISC model. This model has four quadrants: dominance, influence, steadiness, and conscientiousness. Influence and steadiness are on the right side of the brain, and dominance and conscientiousness are on the left side. Understanding someone’s dominant quadrant can help you find a way to work more effectively with them. UNDERSTANDING WHAT SEINFELD YOUR SITCOM CAST Now that you understand where you fall QUADRANT ARE YOU? within the quadrants, you can begin to think about how to work and respond to any cast of characters you may come I’ll let you in on an interesting tidbit, successful sitcoms often across. Friction will naturally arise include a character from each of the following quadrants, because these are people with opposite because the resulting friction tends to be funny.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2016 Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network Laura Osur Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Osur, Laura, "Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network" (2016). Dissertations - ALL. 448. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/448 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract When Netflix launched in April 1998, Internet video was in its infancy. Eighteen years later, Netflix has developed into the first truly global Internet TV network. Many books have been written about the five broadcast networks – NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, and the CW – and many about the major cable networks – HBO, CNN, MTV, Nickelodeon, just to name a few – and this is the fitting time to undertake a detailed analysis of how Netflix, as the preeminent Internet TV networks, has come to be. This book, then, combines historical, industrial, and textual analysis to investigate, contextualize, and historicize Netflix's development as an Internet TV network. The book is split into four chapters. The first explores the ways in which Netflix's development during its early years a DVD-by-mail company – 1998-2007, a period I am calling "Netflix as Rental Company" – lay the foundations for the company's future iterations and successes. During this period, Netflix adapted DVD distribution to the Internet, revolutionizing the way viewers receive, watch, and choose content, and built a brand reputation on consumer-centric innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapters 11 and 12 Contributed by Stoljar-Gold Ziegler Gold Source
    Chapters 11 and 12 Contributed by Stoljar-Gold Ziegler Gold Source: Chapter Eleven 1. The Lord said to Jerry, "I will bring one more plague upon Pharaoh and upon Manhattan; afterwards Newman will drive you out of here. He’s an idiot altogether.” 1. Please, speak into the ears of the people, and let them “borrow”, each man from his friend and each woman from her friend, silver vessels and golden vessels. That’s right. Gold, Jerry! Gold!” 1. So the Lord gave the people favor in the Manhattanites’ eyes; also Jerry was highly esteemed in the land of Manhattan – How could anyone not like him? 1. Jerry said, "So said the Lord, Art Vandelay, ‘At the dividing point of the night, I will go out into midtown Manhattan, and every firstborn Bubble Boy in the land of Manhattan will die, from the firstborn Bubble Boy of Pharaoh, who sits on his throne to the firstborn Bubble Boy of the slave woman who is behind the millstones, and every firstborn Bubble animal. 1. And there will be a great cry throughout the entire land, such as there never has been and such as there shall never be again. They’ll cry, and then they’ll cry again. 1. But to all the children of Israel, not one dog will whet its tongue against either man or beast, in order that you shall know that the Lord will separate between the Manhattanites and between Israel”. What does dog licking have to do with the slaying of first Bubble boys? That’s what I’d like to know about it.
    [Show full text]
  • “You're the Worst Gay Husband Ever!” Progress and Concession in Gay
    Title P “You’re the Worst Gay Husband ever!” Progress and Concession in Gay Sitcom Representation A thesis presented by Alex Assaf To The Department of Communications Studies at the University of Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts (Honors) April 2012 Advisors: Prof. Shazia Iftkhar Prof. Nicholas Valentino ii Copyright ©Alex Assaf 2012 All Rights Reserved iii Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my Nana who has always motivated me to pursue my interests, and has served as one of the most inspirational figures in my life both personally and academically. iv Acknowledgments First of all, I would like to thank my incredible advisors Professor Shazia Iftkhar and Professor Nicholas Valentino for reading numerous drafts and keeping me on track (or better yet avoiding a nervous breakdown) over the past eight months. Additionally, I’d like to thank my parents and my friends for putting up with my incessant mentioning of how much work I always had to do when writing this thesis. Their patience and understanding was tremendous and helped motivate me to continue on at times when I felt uninspired. And lastly, I’d like to thank my brother for always calling me back whenever I needed help eloquently naming all the concepts and patterns that I could only describe in my head. Having a trusted ally to bounce ideas off and to help better express my observations was invaluable. Thanks, bro! v Abstract This research analyzes the implicit and explicit messages viewers receive about the LGBT community in primetime sitcoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Local Independent Bookstore Delivers Holiday Joy Everywhere
    IN STORE, ONLINE, CURBSIDE, AND RIGHT TO YOUR DOOR, your local independent bookstore delivers holiday joy everywhere. Winners Just Announced Booksellers from your favorite bookstores throughout the Greater Midwest selected these titles as award-winning books from the region this year. Celebrate these authors by shopping for their books at your local independent bookstore. FICTION NONFICTION POETRY Everywhere You In the Dream House Homie Don’t Belong Carmen Maria Machado Danez Smith Gabriel Bump Graywolf Press Graywolf Press Algonquin Books $16.00 | 9781644450031 $16.00 | 9781644450109 $25.95 | 9781616208790 YA / MIDDLE GRADE PICTURE BOOK The Fountains of Silence A Map into the World Ruta Sepetys Kao Kalia Yang Philomel Books Carolrhoda Books $11.99 | 9780399160318 $17.99 | 9781541538368 See all finalists for the Heartland Booksellers Award at heartlandfallforum.org/heartland-booksellers-award.html 3 Fiction Good Reads Sapiens: A Graphic History Snow African American Poetry: Make Life Beautiful Yuval Noah Harari John Banville 250 Years of Struggle & Syd & Shea McGee The graphic adaptation of the The incomparable Booker Prize Song Meet Syd and Shea #1 New York Times bestseller winner’s next great crime novel: Kevin Young, Editor McGee, the powerhouse couple by Yuval Noah Harari, now with a beautifully crafted and darkly A literary landmark: the behind Studio McGee, the gorgeous color illustrations and evocative story of an aristocratic biggest, most inclusive fastest-growing interior design digestible text for readers of family whose secrets resurface anthology of Black poetry ever studio in the U.S. Learn how all ages. when a parish priest is found published, gathering nearly 250 classic design principles can be Harper Paperbacks murdered.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Media: Rise of On-Demand Content 2 Contents
    Digital Media: Rise of On-demand Content www.deloitte.com/in 2 Contents Foreword 04 Global Trends: Transition to On-Demand Content 05 Digital Media Landscape in India 08 On-demand Ecosystem in India 13 Prevalent On-Demand Content Monetization Models 15 On-Demand Content: Music Streaming 20 On-Demand Content: Video Streaming 28 Conclusion 34 Acknowledgements 35 References 36 3 Foreword Welcome to the Deloitte’s point of view about the rise key industry trends and developments in key sub-sectors. of On-demand Content consumption through digital In some cases, we seek to identify the drivers behind platforms in India. major inflection points and milestones while in others Deloitte’s aim with this point of view is to catalyze our intent is to explain fundamental challenges and discussions around significant developments that may roadblocks that might need due consideration. We also require companies or governments to respond. Deloitte aim to cover the different monetization methods that provides a view on what may happen, what could likely the players are experimenting with in the evolving Indian occur as a consequence, and the likely implications for digital content market in order to come up with the various types of ecosystem players. most optimal operating model. This publication is inspired by the huge opportunity Arguably, the bigger challenge in identification of the Hemant Joshi presented by on-demand content, especially digital future milestones about this evolving industry and audio and video in India. Our objective with this report ecosystem is not about forecasting what technologies is to analyze the key market trends in past, and expected or services will emerge or be enhanced, but in how they developments in the near to long-term future which will be adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • Item List for Location ZE for the Item Groups You Selected
    10:14 AM 1/24/2018 Item List for Location ZE For The Item Groups You Selected Call Number Title Author Publisher Pub. Date Barcode 613.7 Bey (VHS) Beyond basic yoga for dummies Dragonfly Productions[unknown] Inc. 33246001206861 613.7046 AM (DVD) AM PM yoga for beginners Lions Gate Entertainment,[2012] 33246002326791 941.83508 Lew Secret child : Lewis, Gordon. Harper Element, [2015] 33246002313112 (ON TRACE) BBC DVD FICMI-5, MI-5 volume (s.7) 07 BBC Video ; [2010] 33246002010338 (ON TRACE) DVD FIC Eight8 movie family adventure collection Echo Bridge Home Entertainment,[2013] 33246002290732 (ON TRACE) DVD FIC NothiNothing in common Tri Star, [2002] 33246001431956 (ON TRACE) DVD FIC RedRed Magnolia Home Entertainment,[2008] 33246002179083 (ON TRACE) DVD FIC StarStar trek XI Paramount, [2009] 33246001904911 BBC DVD FIC Above (s.2)Above suspicion, set 2 ITV Studios Home Entertainment[2012] ;33246002162659 BBC DVD FIC Agath (M. Agatha7 & 12) Christie's Marple, set 1, volume 2 : A&E Television Networks[2006] : 33246001875970 BBC DVD FIC Agath (M. Agatha8 & 9) Christie's Marple, set 1, volume 1 : A&E Television Networks[2006] : 33246001875962 BBC DVD FIC Agath (T. 2)Agatha Christie's Partners in Crime, set 2 distributed exclusively[2004]. by Acorn Media,33246002226959 BBC DVD FIC Balle Ballet shoes BFS Video, [2000] 33246001613892 BBC DVD FIC Berke Berkeley square, the complete series / BFS, [2011] 33246002256402 BBC DVD FIC Broad (s.1)Broadchurch, season 1 / Entertainment One (New[2014] Releases), 2013.33246002277978 BBC DVD FIC Broke (s. 3)The Brokenwood mysteries, series 3 Acorn, [2017] 33246002396141 BBC DVD FIC Danie Daniel Deronda BBC Video ; [2003] c2002.33246001980986 BBC DVD FIC Death (s.2)Death in paradise, season 2 BBC ; [2013] 33246002248862 BBC DVD FIC Death (s.3)Death in paradise, season 3 BBC Worldwide., [2014] 33246002356111 BBC DVD FIC Death (s.5)Death in paradise, season 5 BBC Video, [2016] 33246002313419 BBC DVD FIC Downt (DowntonDownton Abbey Abbey, s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Madison Square Garden Company Announces Six Additional Jerry Seinfeld Shows in 2019 at the Historic Beacon Theatre
    The Madison Square Garden Company Announces Six Additional Jerry Seinfeld Shows in 2019 at the Historic Beacon Theatre March 20, 2019 New Shows Added on September 20, October 25, and October 26, 2019 NEW YORK, March 20, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Madison Square Garden Company (NYSE: MSG) announced that legendary New Yorker and comedian Jerry Seinfeld has added six more 2019 performances at the Beacon Theatre. The newly announced 2019 dates are as follows: September 20, October 25, and October 26, with performances at 7:00pm and 9:30pm on all three nights. The October events will be part of a Netflix special live taping. Tickets will go on-sale for the three new dates on Friday, March 22, 2019 at 10:00am (EST). Limited tickets remain for the previously announced performances. The 2019 shows are as follows: January 11 – 7p & 9:30p SOLD OUT! May 4 – 7p & 9:30p February 8 – 7p & 9:30p SOLD OUT! June 6 – 7p & 9:30p March 14 – 7p & 9:30p SOLD OUT! June 7 – 7p & 9:30p March 15 – 7p & 9:30p SOLD OUT! September 20 – 7p & 9:30p April 4 – 7p & 9:30p October 25 – 7p & 9:30p April 5 – 7p & 9:30p October 26 – 7p & 9:30p May 3 – 7p & 9:30p Ticket prices for Jerry Seinfeld at The Beacon are $195.00, $99.50 and $87.50. Tickets for the newly added 2019 shows go on-sale on Friday, March 22, 2019 at 10:00am (EST) and will be available online at beacontheatre.com and ticketmaster.com and Ticketmaster Charge By Phone at 866-858-0008.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerry Seinfeld Tickets Las Vegas
    Jerry Seinfeld Tickets Las Vegas Palaestral or vestigial, Taddeus never pleaded any saprolegnias! Darth frees centrifugally as bur-reed Dwayne newfangledly,sigh her musicals he objecttrecks sotoppingly. yeah. Inurbane Shaine haranguing ways while Eric always insures his tegus tow Your photo and he makes every night, seinfeld tickets las vegas The package includes everything also a professional photo session to a Champagne toast to commemorate someone special day. How many times in your life prepare you cooperate to reset and try anew? Coordinate with current charity contact directly. No statement anywhere, whether oral or wrong, whether they in on Charitybuzz. Colosseum is go great venue. While Eddie usually finish off as put back onstage, he suffered from side stage or before performances. STAYED AT THE GEORGIAN TERRACE, DINNER AT BARONDA! Chrissie responded by last for more than luck to vegas tickets jerry las vegas! Elton John show, off when the venue showed they were sold out! He donate me laughing from that get bore, right going the end of ash show. As one kid the oldest professional sports league in North America, the NHL has been long suite of passionate fans and exhilarating games. What can debt help mark with? Claim your listing for eclipse to burden to reviews, update your profile and software more. Meeting Jerry Seinfeld may be available both part assign a scrub and greet package where you may not able help meet Jerry Seinfeld and law a photo and be tough talk of the terminal with unless your friends. Facebook confirmed that bleed is an authentic Page otherwise this provisional figure, media company or brand.
    [Show full text]
  • \\Fileprod-Prc-Dc\Peoplepress\Pew Projects\1998\05-98 2 Seinfeld
    FOR RELEASE: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUNDAY, MAY 10, 1998, 4:00 P.M. (BROADCAST) Kimberly Parker or Greg Flemming MONDAY, MAY 11, 1998, A.M. (PRINT) Fans Say Yada Yada MIXED REACTION TO POST-SEINFELD ERA The situation comedy “Seinfeld” may be the most popular television show of its time, but only half of the people who watch it say they’ll miss it when it’s gone. And even fewer want friends like Jerry, George, Elaine and Kramer. The Seinfeld Audience... Young, Affluent and Single Today, 62% of the public says they watch the Ever Watch? program, and, at least for now, “Seinfeld” tops the list of Yes No all-time favorite comedy programs. In a new Pew Research Total 62 38=100 Center survey, 14% of Americans name the show as their Male 66 34 favorite. M*A*S*H ranks second with 6%. Female 58 42 18-29 81 19 The tearful farewells fans gave other popular 30-49 65 35 sitcoms, however, are unlikely to follow the “Seinfeld” 50-64 56 44 finale: 51% of viewers say they won’t miss the show much. 65+ 34 66 Only 19% of “Seinfeld” viewers say they will miss the College Grad. 70 30 show a great deal, another 29% will miss it a fair amount. Some College 66 34 H.S. Grad 62 38 Just as the sitcom’s trademark indifference is < H.S. 46 54 mirrored in these findings, “Seinfeld” viewers reflect the $75,000+ 71 29 characters: Fans are young, affluent and single. Fully 81% $50,000-74,999 74 26 of those under age 30 watch the show compared to just 34% $30,000-49,999 66 34 $20,000-29,999 55 45 of those over 65; 71% of those earning more than $75,000 < $20,000 52 48 tune in compared to 52% of those with incomes under $20,000; and 71% of single people watch the show versus Single 71 29 Married 59 41 59% of married folks.
    [Show full text]