Senegal - Third Multi-Sectoral Structural Reforms Development Policy Financing (P170366)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Senegal - Third Multi-Sectoral Structural Reforms Development Policy Financing (P170366) The World Bank Senegal - Third Multi-Sectoral Structural Reforms Development Policy Financing (P170366) Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: PGD111 INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION PROJECT DOCUMENT FOR A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT POLICY CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF EURO 161.4 MILLION (US$180.0 MILLION EQUIVALENT) Public Disclosure Authorized TO THE REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL FOR THE THIRD MULTI-SECTORAL STRUCTURAL REFORMS DEVELOPMENT POLICY FINANCING November 21, 2019 Public Disclosure Authorized Energy and Extractives Global Practice Africa Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official Public Disclosure Authorized duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. The World Bank Senegal - Third Multi-Sectoral Structural Reforms Development Policy Financing (P170366) Republic of Senegal GOVERNMENT FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective as of October 31, 2019) Currency Unit = CFAF US$1.00 = 588.03812839 CFAF US$1.00 = 0.89645899 EURO US$1.00 = 0.72495813 SDR ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS The World Bank Senegal - Third Multi-Sectoral Structural Reforms Development Policy Financing (P170366) ADIE State Informatics Agency (Agence de l’Informatique de l’État) AfDB African Development Bank ANSD National Statistics and Demographics Agency (Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie) ARTP Telecommunications and Postal Services Regulator (Autorité de Régulation des Télécommunications et des Postes) ASA Advisory Services and Analytics BCEAO Central Bank of Western African States (Banque Centrale des Etats de l’Afrique de l’Ouest) CFAF Financial Community of Africa (Communauté financière d'Afrique) Franc CGU Single Global Contribution (Contribution Globale Unique) CNN National Consultative Council (Conseil National du Numérique) COP Conference of the Parties CPF Country Partnership Framework CRSE Regulatory Commission for the Electricity Sector (Commission de Regulation du Secteur de l’Eléctricité) DE4A Digital Economy for Africa DGID Tax Administration (Direction Générale des Impôts et Domaines) DPF Development Policy Financing DSA Debt Service Assessment DSF Debt Sustainability Framework EBITDA Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States EPAF Public Autonomous Entity (Etablissement Publique à Autonomie Financière) ESPS Senegal Poverty Monitoring Survey (Enquête de suivi de la pauvreté au Sénégal) EU European Union FDI Foreign Direct Investment FSE Energy Sector Support Fund (Fonds Spécial De Soutien au Secteur de L'Énergie) FSRU Floating Storage and Regasification Unit GDP Gross Domestic Product GEP Global Economic Prospects GHG Greenhouse Gas DPO Development Policy Operation HCI Human Capital Index HFO Heavy Fuel Oil IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ICT Information and Communications Technology IDA International Development Association IFC International Finance Corporation IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards IMF International Monetary Fund IPP Independent Power Producer ISP Internet Service Provider KfW German Development Bank (Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau) LDP Letter of Development Policy LESDP Letter of Energy Sector Development Policy LFI Initial Budget Act (Loi de Finances Initiale) LFR Budget Amendement Act (Loi de Finances Rectificative) LMIC Lower Middle-income Country LNG Liquified Natural Gas M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MCC Millennium Challenge Corporation MCTPEN Ministry of Communication, Telecommunications, Posts and Digital Economy (Ministère de la Communication, des Télécommunications, des Postes et de l'Economie Numérique) MFB Ministry of Finance and Budget (used interchangeably with Ministry of Finance and Budget or MOF) MFD Maximizing Finance for Development MIGA Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency MOF Ministry of Finance (used interchangeably with Ministry of Finance and Budget or MFB) MPE Ministry of Energy (Ministère du Pétrole et des Energies) MSME Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises MTEF Medium-Term Expenditure Framework NPL Non-performing loan OMVG Gambia River Basin Development Organisation (L'Organisation pour la Mise en Valeur du fleuve Gambie) OMVS Senegal River Basin Development Organisation (L'Organisation pour la Mise en Valeur du Fleuve Sénégal) PAP Priority Action Plan (Plan d’Actions Prioritaires) PCI Policy Coordination Instrument PDO Program Development Objective PER Public Expenditure Review PSE Emerging Senegal Plan (Plan Senegal Emergent) PV Photovoltaic RE Renewable Energy RMA Maximum Allowed Revenue (Le Revenu Maximum Autorisé) SCD Systematic Country Diagnostic SDR Special Drawing Rights SENELEC Electricity Utility of Senegal SME Small to medium sized enterprise SSA Sub-Saharan Africa SSN Senegal Digital Strategy (Stratégie Sénégal Numérique) SOE State owned enterprise SPV Special Purpose Vehicle TCO Municipal Tax for Energy (Taxe Communale sur les Consommations d'Energie) TER Regional Express Train (Train Express Regional) ToT Terms of trade UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change USF Universal Service Fund VAT Value-added Tax WAEMU West African Economic and Monetary Union WAPP West African Power Pool WB World Bank WBG World Bank Group . Regional Vice President: Hafez M. H. Ghanem Country Director: Nathan M. Belete Global and Regional Director: Riccardo Puliti Practice Manager: Charles Joseph Cormier Mustafa Zakir Hussain, Arthur Denis Pascal Foch, Markus Task Team Leaders: Kitzmuller, Laurent Olivier Corthay The World Bank Senegal - Third Multi-Sectoral Structural Reforms Development Policy Financing (P170366) REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL SENEGAL - THIRD MULTI-SECTORAL STRUCTURAL REFORMS DEVELOPMENT POLICY FINANCING TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FINANCING AND PROGRAM .......................................................................3 1. INTRODUCTION AND COUNTRY CONTEXT ...................................................................................5 2. MACROECONOMIC POLICY FRAMEWORK ....................................................................................7 2.1. RECENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS ........................................................................................... 7 2.2. MACROECONOMIC OUTLOOK AND DEBT SUSTAINABILITY ...................................................... 14 2.3. IMF RELATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 19 3. GOVERNMENT PROGRAM ........................................................................................................ 19 4. PROPOSED OPERATION ............................................................................................................ 21 4.1. LINK TO GOVERNMENT PROGRAM AND OPERATION DESCRIPTION .......................................... 21 4.2. PRIOR ACTIONS, RESULTS AND ANALYTICAL UNDERPINNINGS .................................................. 22 4.3. LINK TO CPF, OTHER BANK OPERATIONS AND THE WBG STRATEGY .......................................... 48 4.4. CONSULTATIONS AND COLLABORATION WITH DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS ............................... 51 5. OTHER DESIGN AND APPRAISAL ISSUES .................................................................................... 52 5.1. POVERTY AND SOCIAL IMPACT .................................................................................................... 52 5.2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS ......................................................................................................... 55 5.3. PFM, DISBURSEMENT AND AUDITING ASPECTS .......................................................................... 55 5.4. MONITORING, EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY .................................................................. 57 6. SUMMARY OF RISKS AND MITIGATION ..................................................................................... 58 ANNEX 1: POLICY AND RESULTS MATRIX .......................................................................................... 61 ANNEX 2: LETTER OF DEVELOPMENT POLICY ..................................................................................... 70 ANNEX 3: ENVIRONMENT AND POVERTY/SOCIAL ANALYSIS ............................................................ 99 ANNEX 4: CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION CO-BENEFITS ................................................................ 103 ANNEX 5: WORLD BANK STRATEGY IN THE ENERGY SECTOR IN SENEGAL ........................................ 106 ANNEX 6: CONTEXT ON ICT SECTOR ............................................................................................... 119 ANNEX 7: CONTEXT ON DIGITAL ECONOMY IN SENEGAL ................................................................. 123 Page 1 The Third Multi-Sectoral Structural Reforms Development Policy Financing (DPF) for the Republic of Senegal was prepared by an International Development Association (IDA) team led by Mustafa Zakir Hussain (Task Team Leader (TTL) and Lead Energy Specialist, IAFE2) and including Arthur Foch (co-TTL and Senior Digital Development Specialist, IDD02), Markus Kitzmuller (co-TTL and Senior Economist, EA2M1), Laurent Olivier Corthay (co-TTL and Senior Private Sector Specialist, EA2F1), Manuel Luengo (Senior Energy Specialist, IAFE2), Ewa Klimowicz (Consultant, IAFE2), Johan Mistiaen (EA2DR), Alioune Fall (Consultant, IAFE2), Nicholas Elms (Consultant, IAFE2), Petra
Recommended publications
  • International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
    Case 1:18-cv-01461-RJL Document 11-8 Filed 09/28/18 Page 1 of 37 International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Case No. ARB/13/1 Karkey Karadeniz Elektrik Uretim A.S. Claimant v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan Respondent Request for Annulment of the Award dated August 22, 2017 in the case of Karkey Karadeniz Elektrik Uretim A.S. v. the Islamic Republic of Pakistan October 27, 2017 Mr. Ahmad I. Aslam Head International Disputes Unit Office of the Attorney General of Pakistan Islamabad - Pakistan Dr. Ignacio Torterola Dr. Diego Brian Gosis Mr. Quinn Smith GST LLP 1875 I Street N.W. 5th Floor Washington, D.C. 20006 Mr. Shahab Qutub Mr. Sameer Khosa Axis Law Chambers 5-S Gulberg II Lahore 54660 Pakistan Case 1:18-cv-01461-RJL Document 11-8 Filed 09/28/18 Page 2 of 37 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATED TERMS AND ACRONYMS ............................................ 3 FORMAL REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................. 7 IDENTIFICATION OF THE AWARD .......................................................................................... 7 DATE OF THE REQUEST FOR ANNULMENT ............................................................................ 7 GROUNDS FOR ANNULMENT ................................................................................................ 7 PAYMENT OF THE REGISTRATION FEE .................................................................................. 8 RELEVANT FACTS ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the United Nations Conference To
    A/CONF.230/14 Report of the United Nations Conference to Support the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 14: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development United Nations Headquarters 5-9 June 2017 United Nations New York, 2017 Note Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. [15 June 2017] Contents Chapter Page I. Resolutions adopted by the Conference ............................................. 5 II. Organization of work and other organizational matters ................................ 11 A. Date and venue of the Conference ............................................. 11 B. Attendance ................................................................ 11 C. Opening of the Conference................................................... 12 D. Election of the two Presidents and other officers of the Conference ................. 13 E. Adoption of the rules of procedure ............................................ 13 F. Adoption of the agenda of the Conference ...................................... 13 G. Organization of work, including the establishment of subsidiary bodies, and other organizational matters ....................................................... 14 H. Credentials of representatives to the Conference ................................. 14 I. Documentation ............................................................ 14 III. General debate ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Current and Planned Adaptation Action in Senegal
    Review of Current and Planned Adaptation Action in Senegal CARIAA Working Paper #18 Alicia Natalia Zamudio Anika Terton CARIAA Working Paper #18 Zamudio, A. N., and Terton, A. 2016. Review of current and planned adaptation action in Senegal. CARIAA Working Paper no. 18. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada and UK Aid, London, United Kingdom. Available online at: www.idrc.ca/cariaa. ISSN: 2292-6798 This CARIAA working paper has been prepared by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). About CARIAA Working Papers This series is based on work funded by Canada’s International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) through the Collaborative Adaptation Research Initiative in Africa and Asia (CARIAA). CARIAA aims to build the resilience of vulnerable populations and their livelihoods in three climate change hot spots in Africa and Asia. The program supports collaborative research to inform adaptation policy and practice. Titles in this series are intended to share initial findings and lessons from research and background studies commissioned by the program. Papers are intended to foster exchange and dialogue within science and policy circles concerned with climate change adaptation in vulnerability hotspots. As an interim output of the CARIAA program, they have not undergone an external review process. Opinions stated are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the policies or opinions of IDRC, DFID, or partners. Feedback is welcomed as a means to strengthen these works: some may later be revised for peer-reviewed publication. Contact Collaborative Adaptation Research Initiative in Africa and Asia c/o International Development Research Centre PO Box 8500, Ottawa, ON Canada K1G 3H9 Tel: (+1) 613-236-6163; Email: [email protected] Creative Commons License This Working Paper is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential of Kuznets Cycle Model in the Analysis of Economy of Sub-Saharan Africa
    UDC 330.552: 339.9 The Potential of Kuznets Cycle Model in the Analysis of Economy of Sub-Saharan Africa ZOIA SOKOLOVA1 ABSTRACT. The article covers the peculiarities of economic development of the two countries of Sub-Saharan Africa – Ghana and Senegal from 1970 to 2013. The trends of their GDP and GDP per capita were analysed. The question of how these indices are affected by changes in population, structure of production, flows of foreign direct investment (FDI) and official development assistance (ODA), as well as the number of employees by economic sectors and indicators distribution of income was investigated. Comparing with other investigations much attention was paid to the trends of remittances from citizens abroad to Ghana and Senegal in addition to these factors. It is revealed that ODA was more important for two countries during a period of slow growth, and during the period of rapid growth of FDI and the growth of GDP, the flows of FDI and ODA were more significant in Ghana, and remittances and SDT – in Senegal. Services are significantly superior in the structure of production of two countries. Among the different types, financial and insurance services are predominant in Ghana and Senegal. The share of agriculture in the structure of production of two countries decreased somewhat during the specified period, while the share of industry increased, which occurred at the expense of the mining sector and construction. It has been determined that there are cycles of ups and downs associated with restructuring of production in the economic processes of Ghana and Senegal. It has been established that not only the human factor, as determined in the conclusions of Kuznets S., but also capital, are important for the growth of their production.
    [Show full text]
  • The Energy Policy of the Republic of Senegal Ahmadou Saïd Ba
    The energy policy of the Republic of Senegal Ahmadou Saïd Ba To cite this version: Ahmadou Saïd Ba. The energy policy of the Republic of Senegal: Evaluation and Perspectives. 2018. hal-01956187 HAL Id: hal-01956187 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01956187 Preprint submitted on 15 Dec 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Copyright Economie et Ingénierie Financière – Section Energie, Finance, Carbone – Domaine Energy Policies Université Paris Dauphine, PSL Research University The energy policy of the Republic of Senegal Evaluation and Perspectives Auteur : Ahmadou Saïd BA 23/01/2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................... 3 3 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 4 4 COUNTRY CONTEXT ............................................................................................................. 4 4.1 POLITICAL OVERVIEW ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Instructions for Submission
    Dynamic Effects of an Economic Partnership Agreement: Implications for Senegal Cissokho Lassana Suffolk University [email protected] [email protected] Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Corpus Christi, TX, February 5-8, 2011 Copyright 2011 by [authors]. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. Dynamic E¤ects of an Economic Partnership Agreement: Implications for Senegal Cissokho Lassana Su¤olk University December 4, 2010 Abstract In this paper, I use a dynamic recursive computable general equilibrium to evaluate, for the economy of Senegal, the dynamic e¤ects of an economic Partnership Agreement between West African countries and the European Union. In the simulation, the liberalization scheme is designed in a way similar to the interim agreement signed by Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana. The e¤ects described are the shifts from the baseline numbers. I found that the production of agricultural goods will decrease, a¤ecting employment negatively, particularly in unskilled labor, since this sector is very labor intensive. In fact, employment drops at around 0.2 percent a year, during the simulation period (2012-2030). GDP grows on average by 1.9 percent a year. The e¤ects of the economic partnership agreement closely mirror the results of a free trade agreement between Senegal and the European Union, implying that a customs union between West African countries is not necessary to reap of the bene…t of the former. 1 Introduction West African countries and the European Union (EU) are a step closer to establishing of a new framework for their trade relationship: an economic partnership agreement (EPA), consistent with the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO).
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management and Its Implications on Household Incomes
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Collins-Sowah, Peron A.; Henning, Christian H. C. A. Working Paper Risk management and its implications on household incomes Working Papers of Agricultural Policy, No. WP2019-05 Provided in Cooperation with: Chair of Agricultural Policy, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kiel Suggested Citation: Collins-Sowah, Peron A.; Henning, Christian H. C. A. (2019) : Risk management and its implications on household incomes, Working Papers of Agricultural Policy, No. WP2019-05, Kiel University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Chair of Agricultural Policy, Kiel This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/213603 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu ISSN: 2366-7109 AGRICULTURAL POLICY WORKING PAPER SERIES WP2019-05 Risk Management and its Implications on Household Incomes Peron A.
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity Market Report July 2021 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY
    Electricity Market Report July 2021 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines the full spectrum of IEA member countries: Spain energy issues including oil, gas and Australia Sweden coal supply and demand, renewable Austria Switzerland energy technologies, electricity Belgium Turkey markets, energy efficiency, access to Canada United Kingdom energy, demand side management Czech Republic United States and much more. Through its work, the Denmark IEA advocates policies that will Estonia IEA association countries: enhance the reliability, affordability Finland Brazil and sustainability of energy in its 30 France China member countries, 8 association Germany India countries and beyond. Greece Indonesia Hungary Morocco Please note that this publication is Ireland Singapore subject to specific restrictions that Italy South Africa limit its use and distribution. The Japan Thailand terms and conditions are available Korea online at www.iea.org/t&c/ Luxembourg Mexico This publication and any map included herein are Netherlands without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty New Zealand over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the Norway name of any territory, city or area. Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org Electricity Market Report – July 2021 Abstract Abstract When the IEA published its first Electricity Market Report in December 2020, large parts of the world were in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic and its resulting lockdowns. Half a year later, electricity demand around the world is rebounding or even exceeding pre-pandemic levels, especially in emerging and developing economies. But the situation remains volatile, with Covid-19 still causing disruptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Society. Given the Current Climate of Anti-Intellectualism
    The Senegal 2000 Research Program; Momar Coumba Diop Abstract This article is an overview of the principal accomplish­ ments of the research program known as the "Senegal 2000 project," which undertook an examination and analysis of Senegalese state and society at the dawn of the new century. A team of social scientists and historians of different generations, nationalities, and disciplinary back­ grounds worked together over a period of years to produce an impressive series of works, presented mostly in the fotm of edited volumes published by CODESRIAEditions Karthala, on Senegalese economy, politics, culture, and society. Given the current climate of anti-intellectualism and persistent pressures to narrow social science research agendas, tbjs overview of the Senegal2000 project serves to rugWight some of the real issues at stake in today's era of political, economic, and social restructuring in Senegal and in West Africa. 1n doing so, it frames some of the dilemmas and choices that are faced by those who, in their diverse ways, are shaping tbe future of tills region. Tbe author is Momar Coumba Diop, a principal coordinator of tbe Senegal 2000 project, and current director of the Centre de Recherches sur les Politiques Sociales (CRE­ POS), BP 6333, Dakar-Etoile, Senegal. ;This article is reprinted, with permission, from the fall 2004 issue of the newsletter of the West African Research Association (WARA). Our original objective was to publish all the research results by the year 2000. The original title of the project was "Senegal: from ' Socialism' to Structural Adjustment, What Politics and Policy for the 21 51 Century?" This essay was trans­ lated by Catherine Boone, University ofTexas at Austin.
    [Show full text]
  • Gfdrr Support to Resilience to Climate Change
    GFDRR SUPPORT TO RESILIENCE TO CLIMATE CHANGE UPDATE AND PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR FY17 Prepared for the Second Meeting of the Resilience to Climate Change Advisory Group April 28, 2016 | Washington, DC 2016 Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20433, U.S.A. Internet: www.gfdrr.org This report is available on the GFDRR website at …… Acknowledgments Preparation of this report was led by Cindy Patricia Quijada Robles, with contributions from Sofia Bettencourt, Axel Baeumler, Daniel Kull and Oscar Anil Ishizawa Escudero. The report was edited by Daniel David Kandy. The graphics were designed by Andres Ignacio Gonzales Flores. Images are from Sofia Bettencourt, Denis Jordy, Joaquin Toro and GFDRR and the World Bank’s Flicker Accounts. Rights and Permissions All rights reserved. The text in this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or nonprofit uses, without special permission, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The GFDRR Secretariat would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication using this report as a source. Copies may be sent to the GFDRR Secretariat at the above address. No use of this publication may be made for resale or other commercial purpose without prior written consent of the GFDRR Secretariat. All images remain the sole property of the source and may not be used for any purpose without written permission from the source. Notes: Fiscal year 2016 (FY) runs from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016. All dollar amounts are in US dollars ($) unless otherwise indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis Overview Map % of Moderately and Severely Food
    Disaster Needs Analysis – Mauritania Disaster Needs Analysis Map % of moderately and severely food insecure – Dec 2011 Source CSA/WFP 2012/01 Islamic Republic of Mauritania Date of publication 03 April 2012 Prepared by: ACAPS, Geneva Nature of the crisis: Food insecurity Crisis Overview Mauritania is a food-deficit country. Domestic cereal production only covers a third of needs during a normal year. Mauritania is highly dependent on imports of coarse grains (millet and sorghum) from neighbouring Senegal and Mali as well as wheat purchased on the international market. This dependency exposes the country to global market fluctuations, keeping poor households in cycles of indebtedness and poverty. Most Mauritanians rely on traditional agriculture and livestock activities for their livelihoods and are in a state of chronic vulnerability due to irregular seasonal rains and climatic conditions. In 2011, dry spells and poor rainfall distribution has resulted in a sharp decline in cereal production, estimated at 30% below 2010 and 6% below the previous five year average. While the 2011 cereal production deficit does not constitute a sufficient trigger for a food crisis, food access has been further reduced by high international and local food prices as well as speculation among local traders. As of December 2011, 600,000 people, almost ¼ of all rural households, were affected by food insecurity (WFP/CSA). Among them, 12% have been classified as severely food insecure. The number of households affected by food insecurity is almost three times higher than in December 2010. Moreover, the December 2011 SMART nutrition survey indicated a GAM rate of 6.8% and over 10% for children under 5 years old in Brakna and Gorgol regions.
    [Show full text]
  • IMPACT of STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT POLICIES on the Fisheries SECTOR in DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
    IMPACT OF STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT POLICIES ON THE FiSHERiES SECTOR iN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES SENEGAL, CHILE, AND THE PHILIPPINES - A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT November 1992 Impact of structural adjustment policies on the fisheries sector in developing countries Senegal, Chile, and the Philippines A preliminary assessment HKL & Associates Ltd Report prepared for the International Development Research Centre and the Canadian International Development Agency, Ottawa INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTRE Ottawa ' Cairo Dakar JohannesburgMontevideoNairobiNew Delhi . Singapore Material contained in this report is produced as submitted and has not been subjected to peer review or editing by IDRC Communications Program staff. Unless otherwise stated, copyright for material in this report is held by the authors. Mention of a proprietary name does not constitute endorsement of the product and is given only for information. ISBN 088936-660-8 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iv I INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE 1 II SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 3 III AN OVERVIEW OF THE WORLD FISHERIES ECONOMY 10 IV STRUCTURAL ADJUSTMENT AND THE FISHERIES SECTOR 21 V CASE STUDY: SENEGAL 27 VI CASE STUDY: CHILE 57 VII CASE STUDY: PHILIPPINES 89 VIII CONCLUSIONS 117 APPENDICES 120 Terms of Reference 121 List of Persons Consulted 123 Bibliography 128 'U ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Max Aguero was our main contact in Chile. He and his assistants, Marcela Cisternas and Exequiel Gonzalez, set up our associate's itinerary and accompanied her to meetings in Santiago, often providing translation services. Dr. Aguero also accompanied her on the field trip to Valparaiso, Vina del Mar and San Antonio. In addition, Dr. Aguero provided much valuable input into this report, both during the visit to Chile and in his comments on an earlier draft.
    [Show full text]