DOCSLIB.ORG

The Eucharist in Medieval Canon Law Thomas M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Eucharist in Medieval Canon Law Thomas M Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-12441-7 - The Eucharist in Medieval Canon Law Thomas M. Izbicki Index More information Index Aelfric, 22, 54, 96, 152, 180, 181 Canons of Edgar, 69, 95, 152, 179 Agostino Patrizzi, 47 Cathars, 18, 81, 102, 125, 127, 151, 182 Ambrose of Milan, 22, 23, 24, 27, 71, 88, Clement V, 8, 120, 134, 221, 222 89, 142, 143 Clementines, 6, 7, 134–135, 208, 221, anointing, 3, 4, 6, 8, 14, 63, 180, 214, 216, 225–226 217 communion, 3, 5, 6, 11, 17, 20, 29, 31, 59, Anselm of Lucca, 4, 23, 57, 70–71, 141 104, 105, 109, 130, 136, 137–138, Antoninus of Florence, 53, 156, 169–170, 139–141, 142–143, 149–150, 176, 197, 198, 220 153–155, 157–159, 166, 174–177, Antonius de Butrio, 47–48, 56, 93, 109, 183, 201, 246, 249 110, 153, 157, 187, 198, 203 daily, 139, 140, 142, 143, 149, Apostolic Penitentiary, 64, 162, 170, 174, 163, 173 175, 200, 208, 212–213, 231–233, 244 deathbed, 174 Articles of Religion, 247, 248 preparation, 144, 147, 149, 151–155, Augustine of Hippo, 22, 24, 26, 58, 59, 88, 168, 176 132, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 154 sickbed, 13, 215–220 under both species, 129–130 baby on paten, 243 Compilatio prima, 241 baptism, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, Compilatio quarta, 7, 36, 181, 183 15, 16, 17, 25, 46, 55, 96, 97, 185, 200, Compilatio quinta, 7, 202 213 Compilatio tertia, 7, 9, 39, 91 Beguines, 134, 135 concomitance, 31, 40, 52, 54, 132, 138, 146, 147, 150, 155, 157, 159, 224 bells, 103, 104, 120, 123–125, 126, 203, concubinage, 66 204, 206, 207, 210, 215, 247–248 benediction of the blessed sacrament, 251, confession, 1, 6, 12, 53, 167, 217, 219, 220, See penance 252 – Berengar of Tours, 22, 24, 27, 45, 142, 146 confraternities, 208, 210, 233, 235 237 Bernard Gui, 18, 66, 127, 201 consubstantiation, 40, 44, 45 Corpus Christi (feast), 8, 13, 14, 20, 219, Bernard of Parma, 9, 40, 44, 107–108 221–237, 249, 250 bread Council of Basel, 132, 161–163 leavened or unleavened, 6, 7, 8, 14, 50, – 67, 73, 74, 76–77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 84, Council of Constance, 19, 46, 66, 128 129, 130, 131, 133, 160 123, 223, See fermented bread – wheat, 29, 43, 50, 67, 70, 72, 74, 77, 79, Council of Florence, 68, 83 85, 93, 123, 123, 250 132, 250 Council of Oxford, 97, 114, 117, 190, Burchard of Worms, 3, 23, 27, 57, 58, 69, 205 71, 87, 139, 140, 144, 145, 164, 179, 216, 217 Council of Trent, 20, 98, 249, 250, 251 Council of Vienne, 134, 221, 225 Cum Marthae (decretal), 7, 38, 39, 40, 41, Calvin, John, 247 42, 43, 44, 48, 56, 72–74, 75, 82, 90, canon of the mass, 33 91, 92, 96, 99, 222 261 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-12441-7 - The Eucharist in Medieval Canon Law Thomas M. Izbicki Index More information 262 Index custody of the Eucharist, 13, 14, 17, 19, Guido de Monte Rocherii, 50, 61, 78, 99, 107, 178–201, 213, 233, 249, See 113, 220, See Manipulus curatorum reserved Eucharist Guillelmus de Monte Lauduno, 134, 222–223, 224 Guillelmus Durantis Senior, 54, 64, 82–83, Damasus, 165, 184, 194 94–95, 111–112, 152 Decretals of Gregory IX,5,7–9, 10, 36, 39, 51, 107, 157, 164, 181, 183, 185, 191, See Gregorian Decretals, See Liber extra Hildebert of Lavardin, 55, 106, 148, 152, Decretum of Gratian, 1–2, 4, 5, 21, 22, 163 25–27, 31, 36, 58, 60, 71, 85, 88, Holy Thursday, 47, 140, 142, 165, 169, 143–144, 179, 181 221, 230 Deusdedit, 4, 58 Honorius III, 8, 51, 68, 73, 106, 107, 202, Devotio Moderna, 105, 121, 159 203, 251 Hostiensis, 9, 41–43, 44, 56, 74–75, 92–93, 108–110, 113, 151, 157, 165, Easter, 171–172 186–187, 194, 202, 203, 210 Easter Duty, 6, 13, 14, 17, 18, 104, 137, Hubert Walter, 9, 96, 101, 174, 205 154, 166, 167, 169, 170 Hugh of Saint Victor, 54, 106 elevation of the host, 11, 16, 17, 19, Huguccio of Pisa, 32, 33–34, 35, 39, 50, 67, 101–125, 126, 128, 130, 131, 132, 72, 74, 147–148, 152, 159, 164, 216 134–136, 182, 202, 204, 209, 211, Humbert of Silva Candida, 22, 27, 28 239, 246, 247, 248, 249, 251, 252 Hussites, 20, 66, 129, 132, 133, 138, 160, mockery of, 18 161–163, 232, 245 Eugenius IV, 162, 228, 234, 240, 241 Eusebius of Emesa, 25, 26, 88, 93, See Eusebius Emisanus idolatry, 50, 109, 113, 114, 116, 117, 123, excommunication, 14, 16, 62, 155, 164, 130, 132, 133, 136, 194, 203, 210, 167, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 210, 240, 241, 242, 245, 249, 251 213, 217, 228, 230 indulgences, 13, 121, 154, 209, 215, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 228, 230, execution, 208 231, 232, 241, 244 Innocent III, 7, 8, 37, 46, 56, 63, 74, 81–82, Fantinus Vallaresso, 84, 93 90–91, 92, 94, 96, 106, 149, 151, 156 Fecit Moyses tabernaculum,29–31, 59, 89, Innocent IV, 40, 50, 56, 73, 75, 76, 92, 186, 145–146, 181, 216 187 Federico Visconti, 166, 188 inquisitors, 17, 18, 19, 46, 47, 66, 120, Firmiter credimus (canon), 5, 11, 35–36, 37, 125, 126, 127, 129, 136, 151, 160, 39, 42, 43, 45, 48–49, 55–57, 60, 62, 163, 201 76, 130–131 interdict, 174, 175, 217, 228 forty hours devotion, 251 intinction, 31, 71, 138, 142, 143, 144, 146, Fourth Lateran Council, 5–6, 9, 10, 13, 14, 149, 163, 216 35, 36, 37, 41, 49, 52, 59, 60, 68, 107, Ivo of Chartres, 4, 21, 23, 58, 87–88, 137, 164, 166, 178, 180, 181, 182, 141–143, 176, 179 183, 184, 187, 190, 191, 194, 195, 202 – Francesco Zabarella, 223 224 Jacoubek of Stříbro, 160 Jacques Fournier, 18, 66, 126, 151 Geoffrey of Trani, 9, 40, 42, 56, 74, 92, Jan Hus, 19, 45, 46–47, 128, 129, 160, 239, 153, 185–186, 202 245 Great Western Schism, 19, 128, 129 Jerome of Prague, 19, 46, 47, 129 Greeks, 67, 68, 71, 72, 73, 74, 76, 77, Jews, 19, 182, 194, 201, 223, 224, 229 80, 81, 83, 85, 93, 122–123, 132, Johannes Andreae, 9, 43–45, 48, 56, 75, 78, 160, 250 92, 109, 110, 134–135, 157, 187, 203, Gregorian Reform, 3, 25, 57, 66, 87, 141, 222 179 Johannes Beleth, 33, 63, 79, 93, 106, 163, Gregory the Great, 26, 71, 102, 103 204, 216 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-12441-7 - The Eucharist in Medieval Canon Law Thomas M. Izbicki Index More information Index 263 Johannes Teutonicus, 9, 39, 42, 48, 49, 59, Panormia, 24, 71, 88, 131, 143, 179 68, 73, 90, 153, 165, 181, 184 Panormitanus, 48, 57, 75, 131, 224–225 John de Burough, 51–52, 53, 62, 80–81, Paris statutes, 10–11, 12, 77, 97, 114, 156, 112, 210, 242, See Pupilla occuli 188, 189, 190, 205, See Parisian syno- John Mirk, 17, 53, 218 dal constitutions John of Erfurt, 52–53, 61, 79, 98, 151, 156, Paucapalea, 27, 71 159, 169, 176, 218, 243 Paulus de Liazariis, 135, 223, 224, 225 John of Freiburg, 52, 61, 79–80, 81, 160, penitentials, 3, 65, 87, 152, 156, 174, 183 168–169 Peter Lombard, 5, 27, 30, 36, 44, 55, 106 John of Imola, 48, 130, 131, 135, 225 Petrus de Ancharano, 223 John Peccham, xi, 65, 121, 137, 151, 192, Protestant Reformation, 20, 85, 130, 132, 206 213, 245, See English Reformation John Wyclif, 19, 45–47, 66, 128, 129, 130, Pseudo-Isidore, 23, 57, 58, 68, 87, 133, 160, 245 138–139, 164, See False Decretals John XXII, 45, 122, 134, 201, 221 pyx, 178, 179–180, 189, 190–191, Juan de Torquemada, 84, 93, 123, 192–193, 195–196, 197, 199, 201, 132–133, 135, 162, 241–242 205, 206, 209, 211–213, 214, 219, Juliana of Mont Cornillon, 195, 221 220, 242, See ciborium, See sacrament house, See tabernacle Karlstadt, Andreas Bodenstein von, 245–246 Raymond of Peñafort, 5, 16, 52, 61, 107, 181, 200, 219 Lanfranc of Bec, 22, 24, 142 Real Presence, 15, 18, 20, 21, 66, 126, 135, Last Supper, 27, 32, 47, 50, 59, 67, 82, 84, 136, 147, 148, 151, 157, 162, 214, 94, 99, 144, 155, 224 217, 222, 238, 245, 246, 249, 251, Lay Folks Mass Book,53 252, See Eucharistic Presence – Lollards, 20, 47, 66, 130, 133, 151, 172, Regino of Prüm, 3, 22, 57, 69, 87, 139 140, 245 178, 184, 216 Luther, Martin, 244, 245–246, 247 reminiscence, 46, 47, 130 Richard Poore, 11–12, 97, 189 Robert Grosseteste, 85, 95, 101, 110, 191, – – magic, 18, 19, 182 183, 184, 186 187, 204 – 194, 198, 200 201, 202, See tricks of Robert Winchelsey, 97, 120, 124 mages, See sorcery, See witches Rubens, Peter Paul, 251 fi Malleus male carum,19 Rufinus, 4, 27–29, 38, 40, 58, 71, 89, Martin V, 19, 46, 66, 129, 131, 133, 160, 144–145, 185, 216 228 Miracle at Bolsena, 238 missals, 10, 87, 96–98, 100–101, 103, 158, sanctuary, 108, 109, 131 227, 250, 251, 252 Second Council of Lyon, 68 monstrances, 130, 161, 212, 213, 228, 229, Second Vatican Council, 251 230–231, 234–235, See ostensory Sicard of Cremona, 32–33, 35, 63–64, 72, 89, 94, 106, 146, 150, 157, 164 Nicholas Eimeric, 18, 127, 133, 135, 162, – 208 Simon of Bisignano, 32, 34 35, 72, 146, Nicholas I, 58 156, 164 simony, 2, 3, 5, 25, 62, 172 Nicholas of Ausimo, 81, 156, 160, 243 – Nicholas of Cusa, 100, 159, 163, 175, 196, Stephen Langton, 65, 96 97, 117, 190, 205 208, 216, 230–231, 240–241, 244 Stephen of Tournai, 29, 59 Sylvester Prierias, 245 Omnis utriusque sexus (canon), 6, 12, 14, 104, 137, 164, 165, 166, 167, 169, 176 Thomas Aquinas, 44, 45, 51, 52, 55, 62, 67, ordination, 1, 2, 4, 5, 12, 54, 55, 61, 62, 63, 84, 96, 99, 100, 162, 221, 243, 244, 64, 65, 84, See holy orders See Angelic Doctor © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-12441-7 - The Eucharist in Medieval Canon Law Thomas M.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landlord Comp] His Tenants Are Squatte
    i • . 4*. n ^tfLkaisdas#**fi''' I Now incorporating Neto 3*. .-<; .«i"-.' VOLUME 1(» NO. 18 Landlord comp] his tenants are squatte Commissioner Duke Holt O'Mara said that theja Bj MARY ELIZABETH DUVFV described] the apartment as has no responsibilitibili y to ''over-utilized," and recommen- the security deposit until the I ed to Marks that he contact the is formally terminated. Coope SUMMIT — The Rent Cow Substandard Housing Board or who has relet the apartment as < mission motioned to dismiss the request an eviction notice from Nov. 1, is due the October rent| \'; complaint brought before the the County Courthouse, He told from the previous tenant. board at last Wednesday night's the landlord, "You have obvious Holt said that in cases such; meeting by Marian Jackson rights for eviction." this the estate can receive the difi against her landlord Frank Marks Marks said, "I don't want ference between the rent due < that he had not given her ade- more money for the apartment, I the landlord and the security} quate notice to quit her apart- just want to get in there to begin deposit. ment and insufficient time to work." locate a new dwelling. Tenants from 390 Morrir In another matter before the Avenue, Phil Schneider and Johp. Jackson* who did not show at commission, landlord Drucilla the meeting, had made a written Gallager, who had spent the pait Cooper wrote to seek their advice two days in County Court battl- request to be allowed to pay a in how to proceed in securing one rent increase to allow her addi- ing their rent increase, were also month's rent due tq her and at the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Medieval Origins of the Financial Revolution: Usury, Rentes, and Negotiability Author(S): John H
    The Medieval Origins of the Financial Revolution: Usury, Rentes, and Negotiability Author(s): John H. Munro Source: The International History Review, Vol. 25, No. 3 (Sep., 2003), pp. 505-562 Published by: The International History Review Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40109398 Accessed: 19/04/2010 14:25 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ihr. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The International History Review is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The International History Review. http://www.jstor.org JOHN H. MUNRO The Medieval Origins of the Financial Revolution: Usury, Rentes,and Negotiability Hamilton observed many years ago that a 'national debt is one of the very few important economic phenomena without roots in the Ancient World'.1 The first evidence for organized public debts is to be found in towns of twelfth-century Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Canon Law in the Medieval English Church: Stubbs Vs
    Michigan Law Review Volume 72 Issue 4 1974 Roman Canon Law in the Medieval English Church: Stubbs vs. Maitland Re-examined After 75 Years in the Light of Some Records from the Church Courts Charles Donahue Jr. University of Michigan Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Legal History Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Charles Donahue Jr., Roman Canon Law in the Medieval English Church: Stubbs vs. Maitland Re-examined After 75 Years in the Light of Some Records from the Church Courts, 72 MICH. L. REV. 647 (1974). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol72/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ROMAN CANON LAW IN THE MEDIEVAL ENGLISH CHURCH: STUBBS VS. MAITLAND RE-EXAMINED AFTER 75 YEARS IN THE LIGHT OF SOME RECORDS FROM THE CHURCH COURTSf Charles Donahue, Jr.* I. INTRODUCTION HE Right Reverend William Stubbs, D.D. (1825-1901), was the T Anglican Bishop of Oxford, sometime Regius Professor of Modem History at Oxford, and a scholar of considerable repute.1 His Constitutional History of England2 was, until quite recently, the standard work in the field, and his editions of texts for the Rolls Series3 leave no doubt that he spent long hours ·with basic source material.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Draft of the Program, 2/2020
    1 16 th International Congress of Medieval Canon Law Saint Louis University, July 19-25, 2020 Second Draft of the Program, 2/2020 N.B. This program is finalized to the best of our knowledge, but it remains subject to small modifications, as needed. *** Sunday, July 19, 2020 (SLU, St. Francis Xavier (“College”) Church and Cupples House) 6 p.m. Opening Mass (College Church; His Eminence, Cardinal Péter Erdö, presiding) 7:30 p.m. Opening Reception (Cupples House) ** Sponsored by Iuris Canonici Medii Aevi Consociatio (ICMAC) and the Saint Louis University Libraries *** Monday, July 20, 2020 (SLU, Busch Student Center) Main Theme: Texts and Jurisprudence 9-10:30 a.m. Welcome and Plenary Address Chair: Steven A. Schoenig, S.J. Plenary Speaker: Robert Somerville, “Pope Urban II and Canon Law, Again” 10:30-11 a.m. Coffee Break ** Sponsored by the Department of History, Saint Louis University 11 a.m.-1 p.m. Concurrent Sessions M1 Authority, Custom, and Legal Precedent in Medieval Canon Law Organizer: Kathleen G. Cushing; Chair: Stephan Dusil 1. Abigail Firey, “The Stability of Tradition: A Warrant for Authority in Carolingian Canon Law?” 2. Kathleen G. Cushing, “Reform and Legal Precedent in Eleventh-century Church Councils” 3. John S. Ott, “Episcopal Letters and Compulsory Oaths: Observations on a Farraginous Collection in Bordeaux, BM Ms. 11” 4. Melodie H. Eichbauer, “Canon Law as an Authority in Libri penitentiales from Paris in the Late Twelfth / Early Thirteenth Century” 2 M2 Emotions and Psychology in Canon Law Chair: John Burden 1. Jeffrey Ryan Barnett, “The Emotions of Killing in Gratian’s Causa 23” 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Magna Carta and the Ius Commune
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1999 Magna Carta and the ius commune Richard H. Helmholz Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard. H. Helmholz, "Magna Carta and the ius commune," 66 University of Chicago Law Review 297 (1999). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Law Review Volume 66 Spring 1999 Number 2 © 1999 by The University of Chicago Magna Carta and the ius commune R.H. Helmholzt The English Magna Carta (1215) has long stood as a symbol of human liberty and the rule of law. This Article investigates its intellectualorigins, suggesting the existence of pos- sible influence on the Charter by the contemporary ius commune, the amalgam of Roman and canon laws that had emerged in consequence of the revival of legal studies on the Con- tinent in the twelfth century. Comparing the substance of over half of the chapters with the contemporary ius commune, the Article demonstrates that many similarities existed. Ac- cepting the possibility of use of Continental sources in drafting the Charter helps explain otherwise puzzling features in it. It also accords with common patterns in legal develop- ment at the time. INTRODUCTION The subject of this inquiry is not unexplored territory. Far from it. Indeed writing about Magna Carta at all requires a measure of presumption.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PECIA SYSTEM and ITS USE Alison Joan Ray
    THE PECIA SYSTEM AND ITS USE IN THE CULTURAL MILIEU OF PARIS, C1250-1330 Alison Joan Ray UCL Submitted for the degree of PhD in History 2015 1 I, Alison Joan Ray, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed, ___________________ 2 ABSTRACT This thesis is an examination of the pecia system in operation at the University of Paris from c1250 to 1330, and its use in the cultural milieu of the city during this period. An appendix (1) lists the manuscripts with user notes on which the thesis is primarily based. As the university community rose as a leading force in theology and philosophy, so too did the book trade that supported this network. The pecia system of book production mass-produced texts efficiently and at a low cost to its users, mainly university masters, students, preachers, and visitors to the Paris cultural community. Users interacted with pecia manuscripts by leaving a wide range of marginalia in works. Marginalia are classified according to a devised user typology scheme and include ownership marks, passage summaries, and comments on the main text. We have two further surviving sources for the Paris system: bookseller lists of pecia-produced works from 1275 and 1304. Chapters 1 to 10 examine separate genres of texts available on the pecia lists, theological and philosophical works as well as preaching aids. That Paris pecia manuscripts were used in action as preaching aids is one of the conclusions the user notes help to establish.
    [Show full text]
  • 282Main Text.Pdf
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Holland, Alexander (2018) John Bromyard's Summa Praedicantium: An Exploration of Late-Medieval Falsity through a Fourteenth-Century Preaching Handbook. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) thesis, University of Kent,. DOI Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/68440/ Document Version UNSPECIFIED Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html JOHN BROMYARD’S SUMMA PRAEDICANTIUM: AN EXPLORATION OF LATE-MEDIEVAL FALSITY THROUGH A FOURTEENTH-CENTURY PREACHING HANDBOOK Alexander William Holland Doctor of Philosophy in Medieval and Early Modern Studies University of Kent 91,417 words May 2018 1 CONTENTS Abbreviations – p. 2 Introduction – p. 3 PART 1 – p. 19 Chapter 1 – The life and works of John Bromyard, p. 19 Chapter 2 – The manuscripts and printed editions, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Anuscripts on My Mind
    anuscripts on my mind News from the No. 28 September 2019 ❧ Editor’s Remarks ❧ Exhibitions ❧ Queries and Comments ❧ Conferences and Symposia ❧ New Publications, etc. ❧ Editor’s Remarks ear colleagues and manuscript lovers, we are now close to starting a new season. After a not-so- Dunbearable summer, things seem to be cooling off a bit, and I'm looking forward to walking around with a jacket on instead of tank tops (though I've kept a jacket and wooly sweaters in my office all sum- mer to counteract the freezing A/C). I have a couple of announcements to make as I put the finishing touches to this issue of Manuscripts on My Mind. The first is to report that this year's 46th Saint Louis Conference on Manuscript Studies— held on June 17 and 18 and embedded in the annual Symposium on Medieval and Renaissance Studies organized by the Center for Medieval Studies at Saint Louis University—was uniformly brilliant: papers were especially well crafted, beautifully delivered, presented new material and ideas, and gave us all a lot to think about. Francesca Manzari's plenary lecture assessed the relatively unexplored topic of four- teenth-century Italian Books of Hours, connecting them with similar devotional instruments and texts and amplifying our knowledge about pious activities of the time. My great thanks to all who made it such a memorable occasion. The next news is more difficult to put into words. I deeply regret having to tell you that next year's 47th Saint Louis Conference on Manuscript Studies, to be held June 15-17, 2020, will be the last I organize and officiate.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/28338 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-10-01 and may be subject to change. Tolerantia: A Medieval Concept Istvân Bejczy The notion o f tolerance is generally considered a product of modem times and in particular of the Age of Reason.1 The enlightened philosophers, who laid the foundations of liberalism and democracy, are often hailed as the men who introduced the notion of tolerance as a means of guaranteeing maximum freedom to the individual members of society. Writings such as the Epistola de tolerantia o f John Locke and the Traité sur la tolérance of Voltaire prove in­ deed that tolerance was an important topic in enlightened thought. Sometimes it is believed that an earlier notion of tolerance can be found, most notably in the writings of Christian humanists like Erasmus. As a matter o f fact, “Erasmian tolerance” is a standing phrase in the Netherlands, where the people are happy to link the one virtue for which they openly praise themselves with the only Dutch author who is universally known. The Middle Ages, on the other hand, have no reputation for tolerance, the lack of which is usually attributed to the influence of a powerful Church that was able and willing to suppress all major deviations from the exclusive truth it was convinced it possessed. Only the Reformation, it is often argued, forced the Church to change its attitude and to redefine its relation towards dissi­ dents.2 As a consequence, many historical studies of the idea o f tolerance begin only in the sixteenth century.3 This representation of the history of tolerance is, however, distorted.
    [Show full text]
  • Fransen the Religious Aspect Of
    Gérard Fransen, “The Religious Aspect of Law,” trans. W.L. North, from the French “L’Aspect religieux du droit,” in Chiesa, diritto, e ordinamento della ‘Societas christiana’ nei secoli XI e XII: Atti della nona Settimana di studio, Mendola 1983, Miscellanea del Centro di studi medioevali 11, Milan 1986, 159–170. “When canon law,” writes Gabriel LeBras, “gained its autonomy in the twelfth century, it remained for a time the ally of theology; in the thirteenth century, however, it diverged from it, not in order to render itself clearly more spiritual but to become increasingly civil and almost secular. Many wish for its religious character to be restored to it.” 1 For my part, I would undoubtedly be less severe for the thirteenth century than for the sixteenth. Furthermore, I think it necessary, when speaking of canon law, to distinguish between the “sources”, that is to say the conciliar or papal interventions—of different natures—and the science of canon law, that is, the syntheses, whether good or bad, elaborated by canonists of every level of ability, the great and the mediocre, and the finally the idea that contemporaries make of canon law itself. I am speaking of “canon law”. I have long believed that the term was recent, that is, after the Council of Trent. It is not: we find it in the Summa Viridunensis from the 1170s, in a Questio (Klosterneuberg/Sion) from the 1220s, and from the pen of Humbert of Romans who, in the second half of the thirteenth century, explains to his Dominican brothers how it is fitting to preach to students “on canon law”.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Draft of the Program, Feb. 24, 2020
    1 16th International Congress of Medieval Canon Law Saint Louis University, July 19-25, 2020 Third Draft of the Program, Feb. 24, 2020 N.B. This program is finalized to the best of our knowledge, but it remains subject to small modifications, as needed. *** Sunday, July 19, 2020 (SLU, St. Francis Xavier (“College”) Church and Cupples House) 6 p.m. Opening Mass (College Church; His Eminence, Cardinal Péter Erdö, presiding) 7:30 p.m. Opening Reception (Cupples House) **Sponsored by Iuris Canonici Medii Aevi Consociatio (ICMAC) and the Saint Louis University Libraries *** Monday, July 20, 2020 (SLU, Busch Student Center) Main Theme: Texts and Jurisprudence 9-10:30 a.m. Welcome and Plenary Address Chair: Steven A. Schoenig, S.J. Plenary Speaker: Robert Somerville, “Pope Urban II and Canon Law, Again” 10:30-11 a.m. Coffee Break ** Sponsored by the Department of History, Saint Louis University 11 a.m.-1 p.m. Concurrent Sessions M1 Authority, Custom, and Legal Precedent in Medieval Canon Law Organizer: Kathleen G. Cushing; Chair: Stephan Dusil 1. Abigail Firey, “The Stability of Tradition: A Warrant for Authority in Carolingian Canon Law?” 2. Kathleen G. Cushing, “Reform and Legal Precedent in Eleventh-century Church Councils” 3. John S. Ott, “Episcopal Letters and Compulsory Oaths: Observations on a Farraginous Collection in Bordeaux, BM Ms. 11” 4. Melodie H. Eichbauer, “Canon Law as an Authority in Libri penitentiales from Paris in the Late Twelfth / Early Thirteenth Century” 2 M2 Emotions and Psychology in Canon Law Chair: John Burden 1. Jeffrey Ryan Barnett, “The Emotions of Killing in Gratian’s Causa 23” 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolerantia: a Medieval Concept
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/28338 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2017-12-05 and may be subject to change. Tolerantia: A Medieval Concept Istvân Bejczy The notion o f tolerance is generally considered a product of modem times and in particular of the Age of Reason.1 The enlightened philosophers, who laid the foundations of liberalism and democracy, are often hailed as the men who introduced the notion of tolerance as a means of guaranteeing maximum freedom to the individual members of society. Writings such as the Epistola de tolerantia o f John Locke and the Traité sur la tolérance of Voltaire prove in­ deed that tolerance was an important topic in enlightened thought. Sometimes it is believed that an earlier notion of tolerance can be found, most notably in the writings of Christian humanists like Erasmus. As a matter o f fact, “Erasmian tolerance” is a standing phrase in the Netherlands, where the people are happy to link the one virtue for which they openly praise themselves with the only Dutch author who is universally known. The Middle Ages, on the other hand, have no reputation for tolerance, the lack of which is usually attributed to the influence of a powerful Church that was able and willing to suppress all major deviations from the exclusive truth it was convinced it possessed. Only the Reformation, it is often argued, forced the Church to change its attitude and to redefine its relation towards dissi­ dents.2 As a consequence, many historical studies of the idea o f tolerance begin only in the sixteenth century.3 This representation of the history of tolerance is, however, distorted.
    [Show full text]