Engaged Shin Buddhism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Engaged Shin Buddhism Alfred Bloom Emeritus Professor University of Hawaii Introduction In the 21st century many social and political issues are coming to a head culminating in violent conflicts between and within nations. We need not enumerate all the problems here. For Buddhists, the problem is to find a voice to respond with some degree of unity to those issues. Unlike many other religious institutions in the West, Buddhism does not have a central authority to speak for all Buddhists. Perhaps that is not even desirable. Individual organizations such as Shin Buddhism does have a central organization in Japan and in the areas beyond Japan it is the largest and well-organized Buddhist community. Nevertheless, it has not been able to speak with a strong voice, despite the verse in the Juseige (Verses on Weighty Vows), chanted frequently in temples, that the community would open the Dharma treasury universally within the world and always being among the masses, speak with a lion’s voice. Other Buddhist groups are compsed of small local fellowship focused on the practice of their tradition. The Tibetans achieve a degree of unity through the activities of the Dalai Lama. However, the Buddhist voice does not have a real focus with American society, particularly. The reason, in part, for this lack of a social voice, is that during the long history of Buddhism, over 2600 years, it has endured many forms of despotism and political or government control. Only now in the West Buddhism has the freedom to speak out but it has not been prepared to do so. Only one organization exists, the Buddhist Peace Fellowship, to carry the banner of Buddhism into the arena of social change and advocacy. It is a national organization but in comparison to other religious traditions, small. 1 It is important for Buddhists top apprise themselves of the foundations in Buddhism itself which can give direction for their participation in society. In a sense Enlightenment begins here, in attaining understanding of the world to which we offer Buddhism and to engage the various cultures in viewing life from the standpoint of Buddhism and its implications. Hopefully this series of studies will help in that direction and point students to the resources that are available to inform their understanding. Unit One Dharmakara's Vow: Engaged Shin Buddhism There have always been social issues and problems in the world's cultures throughout history. They have become more intense and visible in modern times due to improved travel, communications and many forms of technological developments. There are also increased population pressures that exacerbate problems such as crime and violence and drugs. Many problems such as ecological degradation, nuclear and weapons delivery systems, economic and population growth, political terrorism, and epidemics such as drugs and AIDS have transcended national boundaries. Further many of the major social issues confronting modern people, particularly in the United States, involve religious and spiritual implications. Right off we can think of racism, poverty issues, alcoholism, gambling, medical issues such as transplants, alzheimer's disease etc.abortion, euthanasia, same gender issues, capital punishment, prayer in school, creationism, book censorship and sex education, cloning and bio-genetics. In addition, there is spouse, child and elderly abuse and gun control. Certainly the list can go on. On the international scene, numerous conflicts involve religious rivalries between Catholic and Protestants in Northern Island, Hindus and Muslims in India, Christians and Muslims in the Philippines, Israel and Arab peoples which involve Judaism and Islam at the 2 heart of their conflict. In the U.S. we have our own fundamentalist political activity. In these instances, we can see that religion does not necessarily offer positive solutions to issues, but may actually be the cause of problems. If we look at the many problems broadly, a major factor is the ongoing secularization and modernization, even westernization, which create stresses within societies. We can see this most evidently in Iran and Afghanistan with their solution in promoting Islamic fundamentalism. The extreme fundamentalism of the Taliban in Afghanistan prohibits television or any access to modern culture beyond Islam. It is clear that no one religious tradition has the answers to all these issues and problems. Since religion is the cause or basis for many of them, it is evident that we must be critical in our religious understanding. We must study carefully in order to discover, as best we can, spiritual insights that will contribute to the welfare of society and conduce to our society's spiritual and social well-being. Today people are seeking in many areas for guidance and meaning for their lives in order to confront these confusing and difficult problems. None of us are immune. In a recent obituary column there was a notice of the funeral of a beautiful, young woman who died at age 18 of a drug overdose. The family commented in the notice that we must be more aware of our youth and the life they are living. What story of family suffering lay behind that notice and other incidents that we read everyday in our newspapers? We generally assume the importance of religion and a spiritual perspective in working toward the solution or amelioration of our many problems. However, we must also understand that the major religious traditions originated largely in pre-modern times which never contemplated the problems that we now face either in their multiplicity or their complexity. It is, 3 therefore, difficult to find specific texts and passages from the ancient scriptures that speak directly to current issues. Often religious teachers are very selective in what passages they employ. Sometimes they interpret texts in literal fashion without regard to changed religious and cultural circumstances. This problem is most clearly indicated in the ways that certain Christian leaders take Biblical passages to denounce and condemn gay people and restrict their rights. Buddhism has not been as prone to this type of interpretation because of the highly symbolic and metaphorical character of Buddhist Sutras. Buddhism has followed the principle of interpreting more by the spirit than the letter. What religion can provide for us is a spiritual context or system of values and principles, as well as a community, that is, Buddha, Dharma, Sangha, to grapple with issues. The study of Engaged Buddhism by Professors Christopher S. Queen and Sallie B. King, using the Three Treasures have provided an interpretive system for understanding Buddhist movements and developing our own approach to social issues. With the category Buddha, they consider the personal dimension of religion and its leadership; Engagement or Liberation refer to the Dharma, doctrine or teachings; while Sangha refers to institutions, and actions. Their study shows that, as a major world religion with a 2500 year old tradition, Buddhism possesses ample resources to formulate a Buddhist perspective, without requiring total unanimity or uniformity on any issue. Buddhism respects individual conscience while also inculcating respect and compassion for another's point of view. Shin Buddhism, as a significant development in Buddhist history, has at its disposal the general tradition, as well as features which are distinctive to Shin Buddhism itself. It is the purpose of these sessions simply to open up the issues for discussion. As we have earlier indicated there is no single correct view. What is presented will be this speaker's understanding 4 as the basis for further discussion. From our study together we may discover a core consensus which can be called Shin. It will be clear from my lectures that I begin from a distinctly historical perspective. Our modern culture has become aware of its historicity in that we are all culturally and socially conditioned persons living within a culture that itself has changed through centuries. In actuality, the post-modern view is Buddhistic so far as it deconstructs all forms of social or thought structures and concepts by seeing them in their process of formation. For instance, We often read about the idea of non-soul in Buddhism and the illustration of the chariot to explain it. The chariot is nothing more than the combination of various parts which are called "chariot," though the chariot does not exist in itself as an independent object. Chariot is a label we give to this configuration of parts. Buddhism, as we hear over and over, teaches impermanence; it teaches the delusory character of our thought which misinterprets experience, striving for permanence or substantiality. We easily form attachments and addictions, or graspings, defining ourselves by what we have rather than what we are. We see ourselves as fixed selves rather than a process which grows and develops. From this misunderstanding of our true nature grow our prejudices, our stereotypes, our dogmas, our ego-centrism and conflicts. What Buddhism calls no-self or non-self or emptiness signifies that reality is open; there are no ultimates or absolutes which are beyond challenge or question as to how they conduce to spiritual growth, deepening understanding of life and reality or the formation of fruitful relations among people and with nature. We may call Buddhism a relational relativity. Modern people react negatively to relativism, but relational relativity simply means that everything must be seen in context and relation. Nothing, whether a thing or idea, is isolated from other aspects of our 5 world and its history. In view of its philosophical and spiritual character, Buddhism should be the most creative and dynamic tradition, because its thought is not rigid, as a body in rigor mortis, but flexible, open, evolving, and adaptive. Unfortunately, Buddhism is made up of people who over history have had their own experiences and agendas.