Vol3-Appendix J-Biodiversity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vol3-Appendix J-Biodiversity Appendix J Biodiversity Imperial Oil Resources Limited Cold Lake Expansion Project Volume 3 – EIA Appendices March 2016 APPENDIX J: BIODIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 BIOTIC DIVERSITY DATA AND SUMMARIES ............................................................... 1 1.1 Information and Data Sources ............................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Vegetation Data ...................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Breeding Bird Point Count Data ............................................................. 1 1.1.3 Species of Concern ................................................................................ 1 1.1.4 Alberta Biota ........................................................................................... 2 1.2 Plant Species Diversity from Regional Data .......................................................... 3 1.2.1 Plant Species Information and Data ....................................................... 3 1.2.2 Characteristic Plant Species by Ecological Land Classes ...................... 3 1.2.3 Plant Species Occurrence by Ecological Land Classes ......................... 9 1.2.4 Unique and Uncommon Plant Species ................................................... 9 1.2.5 Sensitive, Rare or at Risk Plant Species ................................................ 9 1.2.6 Exotic Species and Weeds ..................................................................... 9 1.3 Breeding Bird Species Diversity from Regional Data .......................................... 24 1.3.1 Breeding Bird Information and Data ..................................................... 24 1.3.2 Characteristic Breeding Bird Species by Habitat Type ......................... 24 1.3.3 Unique and Uncommon Bird Species ................................................... 24 1.3.4 Sensitive, Rare or at Risk Breeding Bird Species ................................. 24 1.4 List of Alberta Biota ............................................................................................. 31 1.5 References .......................................................................................................... 37 Appendix J – Table of Contents Imperial Oil Resources Limited Cold Lake Expansion Project Volume 3 – EIA Appendices March 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont’d) PAGE LIST OF TABLES Table J-1: Plant Survey Sites in the Terrestrial Regional Study Area (2000 to 2014) ............ 3 Table J-2: Ecological Land Classes Distribution for Vegetation Survey Sites in the Terrestrial Regional Study Area ............................................................................ 4 Table J-3: Characteristic Species by Ecological Land Classes .............................................. 5 Table J-4: Species Presence and Relative Commonness1 by Ecological Land Classes ................................................................................................................ 10 Table J-5: Unique and Uncommon Species Occurrence by Ecological Land Classes ........ 16 Table J-6: Sensitive, Rare or at Risk Plant Species by Habitat Class .................................. 19 Table J-7: Exotic Species and Number of Occurrences by Ecological Land Classes .......... 23 Table J-8: Breeding Bird Call Point Sites by Bird Habitat Type ............................................ 24 Table J-9: Characteristic Breeding Bird Species by Habitat Type Occurrences of Breeding Bird Species by Habitat Type ............................................................... 25 Table J-10: Bird Species Observation Frequencies (%) by Habitat Type .............................. 26 Table J-11: Unique and Uncommon Bird Species.................................................................. 29 Table J-12: Breeding Bird Sensitive, Rare or at Risk Species ............................................... 30 Table J-13: Species Presence in Alberta based on Best Available Data ............................... 32 Table J-14: Typical Habitat Classes for Central Mixedwood Mammal, Reptile and Amphibian, Waterfowl and Shorebird Species based on Published Species Accounts ................................................................................................ 35 Appendix J – Table of Contents Imperial Oil Resources Limited Cold Lake Expansion Project Volume 3 – EIA Appendices March 2016 1.0 BIOTIC DIVERSITY DATA AND SUMMARIES 1.1 Information and Data Sources Information and data sources for taxonomic analysis included a combination of field plot data and information derived from published literature sources. 1.1.1 Vegetation Data Vegetation data were obtained from field studies conducted throughout the TLSA between 2013 and 2014 (see Volume 2, Section 11.0). Additional vegetation field data were obtained from other sources including data collected for the Marie Lake Project in 2000-2001 (used in the Nabiye and Mahihkan North environmental impact assessments) and publically available data collected by the Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute (ABMI); occurring within the terrestrial regional study area (TRSA)). Data from all sources were measured within sample quadrats ranging from 100 to 400 m2 in area and were considered to be representative of ecosystem classes present in the terrestrial local study area (TLSA). All vegetation measurements occurred within the Central Mixedwood Natural Subregion and were located within 50 km of the TLSA, representing the same set of terrestrial species and ecosystems. Data were screened to confirm ecosystem classification and taxonomic accuracy. A total of 161 data plots were available to analyze plant species richness. 1.1.2 Breeding Bird Point Count Data Breeding bird point count data were obtained from field studies conducted throughout the TLSA between 2013 and 2014. Additional breeding bird data were obtained from the ABMI. This data provided breeding bird species presence and relative abundance for habitat types present in the TLSA. Data from all sources were measured using a fixed radius point count survey method. They occurred within the Central Mixedwood Natural Subregion and were located within 50 km of the TLSA, representing the same set of terrestrial species and habitats. Data were screened to confirm habitat classification and taxonomic accuracy. A total of 285 point count sites were used in the analysis of breeding bird species richness. 1.1.3 Species of Concern Species of concern (i.e., species listed as Sensitive, May be at Risk, At Risk, or any tracked rare species), habitat associations and distribution data for the Central Mixedwood Natural Subregion (Natural Regions Committee 2006) of Alberta were determined from ACIMS (2013) and ASRD (2010). Appendix J – Page 1 Imperial Oil Resources Limited Cold Lake Expansion Project Volume 3 – EIA Appendices March 2016 1.1.4 Alberta Biota Species lists for the province of Alberta were compiled from several sources including: Alberta Conservation Information Management System (ACIMS 2013); Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute (ABMI 2014, 2013, 2009a, 2009b, 2006); the Canadian Encyclopedia (2014); USDA Plants Database (2014); Flora of Alberta, 2nd Edition (revised by J.G. Packer) (Moss 1983); University of Alberta, Micro Fungus Collection and Herbarium (2014a); Encyclopaedia of Life (2014); Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) (2014); University of Saskatchewan (2014); Alberta Environment (2014); Insects of Alberta (2013); Aquatic Invertebrates of Alberta (Clifford 1991); and University of Alberta, Alberta Worm Invasion Project (2014b). Information from published sources were next used to assemble a list of mammals, amphibians and reptiles, shorebirds and waterfowl likely to occur within the Central Mixedwood Natural Subregion (Natural Regions Committee 2006). These sources included: The Status of Birds and Vascular Plants in Alberta’s Lower Athabasca Planning Region - Preliminary Assessment (ABMI 2009b) ; The 2010 General Status of Alberta Wild Species (ASRD 2010); Wild Species (ESRD 2013); The Birds of Canada (Godfrey 1986) ; Mammals of Alberta (Pattie and Fisher 1999); The Amphibians and Reptiles of Alberta (Russell and Bauer 1993); The Atlas of Breeding Birds of Alberta (Semenchuk 1992); The Atlas of Breeding Birds of Alberta: A Second Look (FAN 2007); and Alberta Mammals – An Atlas and Guide (Smith 1993). Appendix J – Page 2 Imperial Oil Resources Limited Cold Lake Expansion Project Volume 3 – EIA Appendices March 2016 1.2 Plant Species Diversity from Regional Data 1.2.1 Plant Species Information and Data A subset of field data from this project and other regional sources from 2000 to 2014 was summarized to examine plant species diversity for vascular and nonvascular plants. The total number of plant survey sites, including detailed sites and rare plant searches used for this assessment totalled 439 (Table J-1). Sources included ABMI monitoring sites (in the TRSA) and sites measured as part of this project (in the TLSA). Table J-1: Plant Survey Sites in the Terrestrial Regional Study Area (2000 to 2014) Detailed Survey Sites Total Vascular and Total Rare Plant Project or Study Vascular Vegetation Nonvascular Detailed Search Sites Plants Only Sites Plants Sites ABMI (within TRSA) 16 0 16 0 16 Imperial projects (in TLSA) 18 127 145 278 423 Total 34 128 161 278 439 Data within each site was classified to Ecological Land Classes (ELC) which included ecosite phases for the Boreal Mixedwood region (Beckingham and Archibald 1996), and additional ELC developed for
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi for Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13
    Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Checklist of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi For Genera with Members in Temperate Western North America Draft: 2012-03-13 by E. B. Peterson Calicium abietinum, EBP#4640 1 Draft: 2012-03-13 Checklist of Calicioids – E. B. Peterson Genera Acroscyphus Lév. Brucea Rikkinen Calicium Pers. Chaenotheca Th. Fr. Chaenothecopsis Vainio Coniocybe Ach. = Chaenotheca "Cryptocalicium" – potentially undescribed genus; taxonomic placement is not known but there are resemblances both to Mycocaliciales and Onygenales Cybebe Tibell = Chaenotheca Cyphelium Ach. Microcalicium Vainio Mycocalicium Vainio Phaeocalicium A.F.W. Schmidt Sclerophora Chevall. Sphinctrina Fr. Stenocybe (Nyl.) Körber Texosporium Nádv. ex Tibell & Hofsten Thelomma A. Massal. Tholurna Norman Additional genera are primarily tropical, such as Pyrgillus, Tylophoron About the Species lists Names in bold are believed to be currently valid names. Old synonyms are indented and listed with the current name following (additional synonyms can be found in Esslinger (2011). Names in quotes are nicknames for undescribed species. Names given within tildes (~) are published, but may not be validly published. Underlined species are included in the checklist for North America north of Mexico (Esslinger 2011). Names are given with authorities and original citation date where possible, followed by a colon. Additional citations are given after the colon, followed by a series of abbreviations for states and regions where known. States and provinces use the standard two-letter abbreviation. Regions include: NAm = North America; WNA = western North America (west of the continental divide); Klam = Klamath Region (my home territory). For those not known from North America, continental distribution may be given: SAm = South America; EUR = Europe; ASIA = Asia; Afr = Africa; Aus = Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichens and Allied Fungi of the Indiana Forest Alliance
    2017. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 126(2):129–152 LICHENS AND ALLIED FUNGI OF THE INDIANA FOREST ALLIANCE ECOBLITZ AREA, BROWN AND MONROE COUNTIES, INDIANA INCORPORATED INTO A REVISED CHECKLIST FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA James C. Lendemer: Institute of Systematic Botany, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458-5126 USA ABSTRACT. Based upon voucher collections, 108 lichen species are reported from the Indiana Forest Alliance Ecoblitz area, a 900 acre unit in Morgan-Monroe and Yellowwood State Forests, Brown and Monroe Counties, Indiana. The lichen biota of the study area was characterized as: i) dominated by species with green coccoid photobionts (80% of taxa); ii) comprised of 49% species that reproduce primarily with lichenized diaspores vs. 44% that reproduce primarily through sexual ascospores; iii) comprised of 65% crustose taxa, 29% foliose taxa, and 6% fruticose taxa; iv) one wherein many species are rare (e.g., 55% of species were collected fewer than three times) and fruticose lichens other than Cladonia were entirely absent; and v) one wherein cyanolichens were poorly represented, comprising only three species. Taxonomic diversity ranged from 21 to 56 species per site, with the lowest diversity sites concentrated in riparian corridors and the highest diversity sites on ridges. Low Gap Nature Preserve, located within the study area, was found to have comparable species richness to areas outside the nature preserve, although many species rare in the study area were found only outside preserve boundaries. Sets of rare species are delimited and discussed, as are observations as to the overall low abundance of lichens on corticolous substrates and the presence of many unhealthy foliose lichens on mature tree boles.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium
    Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Lesica Conservation Biology Research 929 Locust Missoula, MT 59802
    THE FLORA OF LOST TRAIL NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 2014 Final Report Prepared by: Peter Lesica Conservation Biology Research 929 Locust Missoula, MT 59802 Prepared for: Lost Trail National Wildlife Refuge 6295 Pleasant Valley Road Marion, MT 59925 December 2014 INTRODUCTION Lost Trail National Wildlife Refuge (hereafter Lost Trail NWR) is a large biological reserve (ca. 8,000 acres) in the Northern Rocky Mountains of northwest Montana. Lost Trail NWR is a mosaic of wetlands, foothills grasslands and montane coniferous forest and provides habitat for a large number of native plants. This vegetation, in turn provides habitat for a large number of vertebrate and invertebrate animals. A comprehensive baseline inventory is an essential step in implementing a program to protect biological diversity for several reasons. Results of the inventory can be used to monitor the loss or gain of native and exotic species diversity. Populations of rare or endangered species can be protected from inappropriate management activities, such as livestock grazing, herbicide application and timber harvest. On the other hand, infestations of invasive exotic plants capable of replacing native species can be controlled. Weed control is most efficient when infestations are detected at an early stage. An on-site herbarium is another important product of a floristic inventory. A complete herbarium is an important tool for documenting the baseline survey, for training personnel and can be useful for education projects. Both a herbarium and an annotated checklist are important aids for plant identification. The purpose of this study was to obtain a comprehensive inventory of vascular plants present on Lost Trail NWR.
    [Show full text]
  • An All-Taxa Biodiversity Inventory of the Huron Mountain Club
    AN ALL-TAXA BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY OF THE HURON MOUNTAIN CLUB Version: August 2016 Cite as: Woods, K.D. (Compiler). 2016. An all-taxa biodiversity inventory of the Huron Mountain Club. Version August 2016. Occasional papers of the Huron Mountain Wildlife Foundation, No. 5. [http://www.hmwf.org/species_list.php] Introduction and general compilation by: Kerry D. Woods Natural Sciences Bennington College Bennington VT 05201 Kingdom Fungi compiled by: Dana L. Richter School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science Michigan Technological University Houghton, MI 49931 DEDICATION This project is dedicated to Dr. William R. Manierre, who is responsible, directly and indirectly, for documenting a large proportion of the taxa listed here. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 5 SOURCES 7 DOMAIN BACTERIA 11 KINGDOM MONERA 11 DOMAIN EUCARYA 13 KINGDOM EUGLENOZOA 13 KINGDOM RHODOPHYTA 13 KINGDOM DINOFLAGELLATA 14 KINGDOM XANTHOPHYTA 15 KINGDOM CHRYSOPHYTA 15 KINGDOM CHROMISTA 16 KINGDOM VIRIDAEPLANTAE 17 Phylum CHLOROPHYTA 18 Phylum BRYOPHYTA 20 Phylum MARCHANTIOPHYTA 27 Phylum ANTHOCEROTOPHYTA 29 Phylum LYCOPODIOPHYTA 30 Phylum EQUISETOPHYTA 31 Phylum POLYPODIOPHYTA 31 Phylum PINOPHYTA 32 Phylum MAGNOLIOPHYTA 32 Class Magnoliopsida 32 Class Liliopsida 44 KINGDOM FUNGI 50 Phylum DEUTEROMYCOTA 50 Phylum CHYTRIDIOMYCOTA 51 Phylum ZYGOMYCOTA 52 Phylum ASCOMYCOTA 52 Phylum BASIDIOMYCOTA 53 LICHENS 68 KINGDOM ANIMALIA 75 Phylum ANNELIDA 76 Phylum MOLLUSCA 77 Phylum ARTHROPODA 79 Class Insecta 80 Order Ephemeroptera 81 Order Odonata 83 Order Orthoptera 85 Order Coleoptera 88 Order Hymenoptera 96 Class Arachnida 110 Phylum CHORDATA 111 Class Actinopterygii 112 Class Amphibia 114 Class Reptilia 115 Class Aves 115 Class Mammalia 121 INTRODUCTION No complete species inventory exists for any area.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants of Hot Springs Valley and Grover Hot Springs State Park Alpine County, California
    Plants of Hot Springs Valley and Grover Hot Springs State Park Alpine County, California Compiled by Tim Messick and Ellen Dean This is a checklist of vascular plants that occur in Hot Springs Valley, including most of Grover Hot Springs State Park, in Alpine County, California. Approximately 310 taxa (distinct species, subspecies, and varieties) have been found in this area. How to Use this List Plants are listed alphabetically, by family, within major groups, according to their scientific names. This is standard practice for plant lists, but isn’t the most user-friendly for people who haven’t made a study of plant taxonomy. Identifying species in some of the larger families (e.g. the Sunflowers, Grasses, and Sedges) can become very technical, requiring examination of many plant characteristics under high magnification. But not to despair—many genera and even species of plants in this list become easy to recognize in the field with only a modest level of study or help from knowledgeable friends. Persistence will be rewarded with wonder at the diversity of plant life around us. Those wishing to pursue plant identification a bit further are encouraged to explore books on plants of the Sierra Nevada, and visit CalPhotos (calphotos.berkeley.edu), the Jepson eFlora (ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora), and CalFlora (www.calflora.org). The California Native Plant Society (www.cnps.org) promotes conservation of plants and their habitats throughout California and is a great resource for learning and for connecting with other native plant enthusiasts. The Nevada Native Plant Society nvnps.org( ) provides a similar focus on native plants of Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Taxonomy and Diversification Events in the Caliciaceae
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Fungal diversity. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Prieto, M., Wedin, M. (2016) Phylogeny, taxonomy and diversification events in the Caliciaceae.. Fungal diversity https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-016-0372-y Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-2031 Fungal Diversity (2017) 82:221–238 DOI 10.1007/s13225-016-0372-y Phylogeny, taxonomy and diversification events in the Caliciaceae Maria Prieto1,2 & Mats Wedin1 Received: 21 December 2015 /Accepted: 19 July 2016 /Published online: 1 August 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Although the high degree of non-monophyly and Calicium pinicola, Calicium trachyliodes, Pseudothelomma parallel evolution has long been acknowledged within the occidentale, Pseudothelomma ocellatum and Thelomma mazaediate Caliciaceae (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota), a brunneum. A key for the mazaedium-producing Caliciaceae is natural re-classification of the group has not yet been accom- included. plished. Here we constructed a multigene phylogeny of the Caliciaceae-Physciaceae clade in order to resolve the detailed Keywords Allocalicium gen. nov. Calicium fossil . relationships within the group, to propose a revised classification, Divergence time estimates . Lichens . Multigene . and to perform a dating study. The few characters present in the Pseudothelomma gen. nov available fossil and the complex character evolution of the group affects the interpretation of morphological traits and thus influ- ences the assignment of the fossil to specific nodes in the phy- Introduction logeny, when divergence time analyses are carried out.
    [Show full text]
  • Msc Thesis, Quinn Barber
    Assessing the vulnerability of rare plants using climate change velocity, habitat connectivity and dispersal ability by Quinn Edward Cameron Barber A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Forest Biology and Management Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta © Quinn Edward Cameron Barber, 2015 Abstract Climate change generally requires species to migrate northward or to higher elevation to maintain constant climate conditions, but migration requirement and migration capacity of individual species can vary greatly. Individual pop- ulations of species occupy different positions in the landscape that determine their required range shift to maintain similar climate, and likewise the mi- gration capacity depends on habitat connectivity. Here, I demonstrate an approach to quantify species vulnerabilities to climate change for 419 rare vascular plants in Alberta, Canada based on multivariate velocity of climate change, local habitat fragmentation, and migration capacity. Climate change velocities indicated that future migration requirements ranged from 1 to 5 km yr-1 in topographically complex landscapes, such as the Alberta Foothills and Rocky Mountains. In contrast, migration requirements to maintain constant climate in relatively flat Boreal Plains, Parkland and Grassland ranged from 4 to 8 km yr-1. Habitat fragmentation was also highest in these flat regions, particularly the Parkland Natural Region. Of the 419 rare vascular plants assessed, 36 were globally threatened (G1 to G3 ranking). Three of these globally threatened species were ranked as extremely vulnerable and five as highly vulnerable to the interactions among climate change velocity, habitat fragmentation and migration capacity. Incorporating dispersal characteristics and habitat fragmentation with local patterns in climate change velocity rep- resents a streamlined vulnerability assessment approach that may be applied to guide conservation actions, particularly where detailed species-specific data is limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Have All Our Asters Gone? by William R
    Sego Lily Spring 2018 41(2) Spring 2018 Volume 41 Number 2 Where Have All Our Asters Gone? by William R. Gray, Submitted to Sego Lily April 2018 ABSTRACT: the genus Aster traditionally contained numerous species from both North America and Eurasia. Based on morphological evidence and DNA sequencing in the 1990s it became clear that the North American species evolved separately, and would need to be assigned to other genera. This paper outlines the evidence, and the disposition of species as carried out in the Flora of North America in 2006. Whatever happened to Aster??? It used to be easy leading wildflower walks for UNPS. Yes, truly, all 21 Asters described by Cronquist in People would ask how to distinguish Asters from Intermountain Flora (Cronquist, 1994) have been Daisies – and I would tell them to look behind the reassigned to other genera by Flora of North America flower and check out the little greenish things (2006). According to FNA there is only a single true surrounding the petals (Fig. 1). If they were all about native Aster in the whole of North America, down from the same length, and skinny, it was probably a daisy or well over a hundred before the dis-Aster. The name is fleabane (Erigeron). If they varied in length, were wider now used almost exclusively for Eurasian plants and overlapped, it was probably an aster (Aster). because Linnaeus chose a well-known European plant For many people that was all they wanted to know and and named it Aster amellus as typical of the genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 6.8-A
    Appendix 6.8-A Terrestrial Wildlife and Vegetation Baseline Report AJAX PROJECT Environmental Assessment Certificate Application / Environmental Impact Statement for a Comprehensive Study Ajax Mine Terrestrial Wildlife and Vegetation Baseline Report Prepared for KGHM Ajax Mining Inc. Prepared by This image cannot currently be displayed. Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. #112, 9547 152 St. Surrey, BC V3R 5Y5 July 2015 Ajax Mine Terrestrial Wildlife and Vegetation Baseline Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared exclusively for KGHM Ajax Mining Inc. by Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. The quality of information, conclusions and estimates contained herein is consistent with the level of effort expended and is based on: i) information available at the time of preparation; ii) data collected by Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. and/or supplied by outside sources; and iii) the assumptions, conditions and qualifications set forth in this report. This report is intended for use by KGHM Ajax Mining Inc. only, subject to the terms and conditions of its contract with Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. Any other use, or reliance on this report by any third party, is at that party’s sole risk. 2 Ajax Mine Terrestrial Wildlife and Vegetation Baseline Keystone Wildlife Research Ltd. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Baseline wildlife and habitat surveys were initiated in 2007 to support a future impact assessment for the redevelopment of two existing, but currently inactive, open pit mines southwest of Kamloops. Detailed Project plans were not available at that time, so the general areas of activity were buffered to define a study area. The two general Project areas at the time were New Afton, an open pit just south of Highway 1, and Ajax, east of Jacko Lake.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Common Lichens of Boone and Story Counties, Lowa
    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 71 Annual Issue Article 21 1964 A Guide to the Common Lichens of Boone and Story Counties, lowa Lois H. Tiffany Iowa State University Karen K. Juhl Iowa State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1964 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Tiffany, Lois H. and Juhl, Karen K. (1964) "A Guide to the Common Lichens of Boone and Story Counties, lowa," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 71(1), 118-135. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol71/iss1/21 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tiffany and Juhl: A Guide to the Common Lichens of Boone and Story Counties, lowa 118 IOWA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE [Vol. 71 was used because it has a larger opening and permits a more rapid transfer of the sample. In this way it is possible to distrib­ ute a sample equally among several slides. If the count at a particular level is exceptionally high, not all of the slides need be counted since each slide is one tenth of the total sample. This dilution method was compared to a count obtained by examination of the whole sample and the examination of in­ dividual slides was found to compare very favorably.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Taxonomy and Diversification Events in the Caliciaceae
    Fungal Diversity (2017) 82:221–238 DOI 10.1007/s13225-016-0372-y Phylogeny, taxonomy and diversification events in the Caliciaceae Maria Prieto1,2 & Mats Wedin1 Received: 21 December 2015 /Accepted: 19 July 2016 /Published online: 1 August 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Although the high degree of non-monophyly and Calicium pinicola, Calicium trachyliodes, Pseudothelomma parallel evolution has long been acknowledged within the occidentale, Pseudothelomma ocellatum and Thelomma mazaediate Caliciaceae (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota), a brunneum. A key for the mazaedium-producing Caliciaceae is natural re-classification of the group has not yet been accom- included. plished. Here we constructed a multigene phylogeny of the Caliciaceae-Physciaceae clade in order to resolve the detailed Keywords Allocalicium gen. nov. Calicium fossil . relationships within the group, to propose a revised classification, Divergence time estimates . Lichens . Multigene . and to perform a dating study. The few characters present in the Pseudothelomma gen. nov available fossil and the complex character evolution of the group affects the interpretation of morphological traits and thus influ- ences the assignment of the fossil to specific nodes in the phy- Introduction logeny, when divergence time analyses are carried out. Alternative fossil assignments resulted in very different time es- Caliciaceae is one of several ascomycete groups characterized timates and the comparison with the analysis based on a second- by producing prototunicate (thin-walled and evanescent) asci ary calibration demonstrates that the most likely placement of the and a mazaedium (an accumulation of loose, maturing spores fossil is close to a terminal node rather than a basal placement in covering the ascoma surface).
    [Show full text]