Political Ecology of Conservation in the 'Alagol, Ulmagol, and Ajigol'

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Political Ecology of Conservation in the 'Alagol, Ulmagol, and Ajigol' Political ecology of conservation in the ‘Alagol, Ulmagol, and Ajigol’ glocal wetlands, Turkmen Sahra, northeast Iran by Parastu Mirabzadeh-Ardakani A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography and Environmental Studies Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2014 Parastu Mirabzadeh-Ardakani Abstract A post-structural political ecology approach, and relational thinking of place, space, scale and power, are used to conceptualize Wetlands of International Importance as ‘glocal wetlands’ and to develop an analytical framework to study relevant people- environment interactions. This framework is applied for the analysis of the power- relations affecting the Alagol, Ulmagol, Ajigol (AUA) wetlands in the Turkmen Sahra, Iran, and its Turkmen population. It demonstrates: (A) The Turkmen were knowledgeable stewards of their natural resources, and were active agents in shaping the AUA landscape that was the source of their livelihoods, and in attracting the biodiversity that led to the AUA being designated as a Ramsar Site. This finding provides a strong basis for acknowledgement of their rights to tenure and access to their ancestral lands, water and natural resources. (B) Nation-state building, territoriality, and control over natural resources are critical political issues. The past and present exercise of state power includes: coercive sedentarization to control the Turkmen and convert them to citizens; exclusionary land use and water policies by the Shahs and the Islamic state; ‘fortress’ conservation facilitated by international conservation organizations and implemented by the Islamic state; and the power geometry of place in the Turkmen Sahra, including citizenship, ethnicity, and minority rights. (C) The approach of the Islamic state and Ramsar Convention Secretariat in interpreting the current AUA landscape as being a successful conservation project, as reflected in the Ramsar’s Advisory Mission Report, was remarkably ahistorical. A major ongoing concern is that the discourse on ii conservation in Iran has experienced a period of stagnation since the 1979 revolution, with the consequence that the concepts of ‘wise use’ and participatory management have not been adopted. This thesis asserts that employment of the glocal wetlands analytical framework leads to better understanding of Ramsar Sites, in Iran and elsewhere, by providing for the carrying out of place- and context-specific studies and the analysis of hidden power relations that shape wetlands and the topology of place. Such analysis provides a platform for setting realistic policy goals and facilitates decision-making processes that are both ecologically and socially just. iii To the Turkmen of Iran With hope for a better future iv Acknowledgement This project would not have been possible without the support of many people. Many thanks to my co-supervisers Kenneth Torrance, who constantly and persuasively helped me survive my doubts, read my numerous revisions with precision and gave me valuable advice, and Scott Mitchell, who believed in me and provided me with the financial support to carry out my field work, read my drafts and had also provided valuable advice. I would also like to thank Derek Smith for his useful comments. My gratitude goes to two university professors in Tehran who made this field work possible. Furthermore, I acknowledge, with much appreciation, the help and support I received from Natalie Pressburger who patiently and kindly answered my questions. Moee jan and Sara jan, thank you for consistently being there for me and offering your support with kindness. Fereidoon, you endured this long process with me with unconditional love, support and care. I love you and appreciate you in my life. Finally, Mom and Dad thank you for sensitizing me to issues of human rights and social justice. v Table of contents Abstract ii Dedication iv Acknowledgment v Table of contents vi List of Tables xi List of Illustrations xi List of Appendices xii List of Abbreviations xiii Glossary xiv CHAPTER I- Introduction 1 1.1. Context of the research 1 1.2. Purpose of the research 2 1.3. Conceptual underpinnings: political ecology, relational thinking, and glocal 7 wetlands 1.4. Background 11 1.4.1. The Convention on Wetlands 11 1.4.2. The Alagol, Ulmagol and Ajigol (AUA) Wetlands of International 12 Importance 1.5. Dissertation structure and organization 17 CHAPTER II- Theory 21 2.1. Nature and society 21 2.1.1. Social Nature 22 2.1.2. Socionature/nature-society hybrids in Actor-network theory (ANT) 27 2.2. Place, space, and scale 34 2.2.1. Place and space 34 vi 2.2.2. Scale and space 44 2.3. Power and space 63 2.3.1. Power-geometry 64 2.3.2. Power/ Knowledge, and governmentality 68 2.3.3. Territoriality and environmental governmentality 71 2.3.4. State power 79 2.3.5. Power as composition 81 2.4. Glocal wetlands and their analytical framework 85 CHAPTER III- Methodology and methods 91 3.1. Context-specific methodologies 91 3.1.2. ‘Insiders’ and ‘outsiders’ in qualitative methodologies 94 3.2. Participatory approaches and methods 95 3.2.1. Conservation territories and participatory mapping 100 3.2.2. Focus groups 109 3.2.3. Interviews 109 3.3. Research design and methods 110 3.3.1. Site selection and preparation 115 3.3.2. Preliminary investigation 117 3.3.3. Structured interviews: Questionnaire 119 3.3.4. Participatory exercises 121 3.3.5. Secondary data analysis, literature review, and archival studies 123 CHAPTER IV- The Turkmen Sahra and Atrekians: landscape, politics and 125 history 4.1. The Turkmen Sahra: ecosystem 125 4.2. Social construction of the Turkmen Sahra: a political and historical review 130 4.3. The Turkmen territories: a socio-ecological system 137 4.3.1. The Turkmen in Central Asia: livelihood strategies, and land and water 137 use 4.3.2. The Atrekians: livelihood strategies, and traditional land and water use 141 vii and management 4.4. Conclusion 159 CHAPTER V- Livelihood strategies of the Tenglians- current status 161 5.1. Village profile 161 5.1.1. Population and households structure 161 5.1.2. Age groups, gender, and labor force 162 5.1.3. Education status 163 5.2. Livelihood Strategies analysis 165 5.2.1. Past, present (2008), and future 165 5.2.2. Wealth categories 168 5.3. Obstacles: access to resources and livelihood 170 5.4. Loans and debts: access to credits 173 5.5. Needs 175 5.6. Conclusion 176 CHAPTER VI- The politics of state natural resource control 179 6.1. Pahlavi shahs 180 6.1.1. State building practices 182 6.1.2. Coercive sedentarization of the Turkmen 191 6.1.3. Land policies, rural development and the Turkmen 195 6.2. The Iranian Islamic State 205 6.2.1. Land use, conversion and transfer: institutions, regulations, and 208 processes 6.2.2. Water management and allocation: institutions, regulations, and 219 processes 6.2.3. Nature protection 226 6.2.4. Spatial planning and development plans: decision-making processes 239 and structures 6.3. Conclusion 247 viii CHAPTER VII- Current land uses and conflicts in the AUA region 250 7.1. Land use change in the AUA region 251 7.1.1. Rangelands 253 7.1.2. Agricultural lands 256 7.1.3. Fish farms 261 7.1.4. Housing 264 7.2. Water 265 7.3. Fishing and hunting 275 7.4. Biodiversity, wildlife, and habitats 278 7.5. Conclusion 288 CHAPTER VIII- The ’rule of law’, and political and civil rights 293 8.1. The Islamic State of Iran and its power structure 293 8.1.1. The ’rule of law’: The paradox of the Islamic State of Iran 296 8.2. Political decentralization and access to decision-making process 314 8.2.1. Islamic Rural Councils 316 8.3. Minority rights 324 8.3.1. Turkmen identity and nationhood 328 8.3.2. Politics of place: resistance and opportunities in the AUA region 337 8.3.3. Global sense of place 340 8.4. Conclusion 343 CHAPTER IX- Conservation: from discourse to practice 345 9.1. Discourse of conservation: from ‘fortress’ and ‘command-and-control’ to 345 socially-just 9.2. Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: ‘wise use’ of wetlands 359 9.3. Discourse of conservation in Iran 366 9.3.1. Social science research 369 9.3.2. Experts, academia, intellectuals, and NGOs 372 9.3.3. The State’s political agenda 376 9.3.4. The AUA Ramsar Advisory Mission: discourse of ‘wise use’ 380 ix 9.4. Conclusion 388 CHAPTER X- Conclusion 392 10.1. Contribution to Knowledge: Theory 395 10.2. Policy relevance 396 List of References 403 Appendix A- Fieldwork calendar 448 Appendix B- Fieldwork verbal script 453 Appendix C- The Atrekians’ old documents 455 Appendix D- Participatory map 457 x List of Tables 3.1. Research summary: analytical framework, questions, methodology, and methods List of Illustrations Figures 3.1. A comparison of Participatory Action Research, Participatory Rural Appraisal, and Rapid Rural Appraisal 3.2. Degree of local participation in participatory exercises 5.1. Population of Tengli, by gender (%) and age groups 5.2. Population of Tengli, classified by age groups 5.3. Education status of Tenglians 5.4. Education status of Tengli, by gender (% to total population) 5.5. Livelihood strategies of Tenglians 5.6. Livelihood strategies of Tenglians differentiated by wealth categories 5.7. Problems Tenglians encounter: access to resources and livelihood 5.8. Tenglians’ debt 5.9. Usage of the borrowed money 5.10. Tenglians’ needs 9.1. Socially-just conservation and access rights Maps 1.1. Map of Iran 1.2. The AUA region xi 4.1. The Atrek River transboundary basin 4.2. The AUA region in 1958 4.3.
Recommended publications
  • A/HRC/13/39/Add.1 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/13/39/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 February 2010 English/French/Spanish only Human Rights Council Thirteenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Manfred Nowak Addendum Summary of information, including individual cases, transmitted to Governments and replies received* * The present document is being circulated in the languages of submission only as it greatly exceeds the page limitations currently imposed by the relevant General Assembly resolutions. GE.10-11514 A/HRC/13/39/Add.1 Contents Paragraphs Page List of abbreviations......................................................................................................................... 5 I. Introduction............................................................................................................. 1–5 6 II. Summary of allegations transmitted and replies received....................................... 1–305 7 Algeria ............................................................................................................ 1 7 Angola ............................................................................................................ 2 7 Argentina ........................................................................................................ 3 8 Australia.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Auksion-TUR 27.11.2020.Pdf
    ÜNS BERIŇ! BÄSLEŞIKLI SÖWDA! Türkmenistanyň Maliýe we ykdysadyýet ministrligi Türkmenistanyň döwlet eýeçiligindäki desgalary hususylaşdyrmak hakynda kanunçylygyna laýyklykda, döwlet eýeçiligindäki desgalary satmak boýunça bäsleşikli söwdalaryň geçirilýändigini habar berýär. Bäsleşikli söwdalar 2020-nji ýylyň 27-nji noýabrynda sagat 10-00-da Türkmenistanyň Maliýe we ykdysadyýet ministrliginiň jaýynda geçirilýär. Salgysy: Aşgabat şäheriniň Arçabil şaýolynyň 156-njy jaýy. Bäsleşikli söwdada satuwa çykarylýan Türkmenistanyň Söwda we daşary ykdysady aragatnaşyklar ministrliginiň, Türkmenistanyň Oba hojalyk we daşky gurşawy goramak ministrliginiň, “Türkmengaz” döwlet konserniniň, “Türkmenhaly” döwlet birleşiginiň, Aşgabat şäheriniň we Ahal, Daşoguz, Lebap hem-de Mary welaýat häkimlikleriniň desgalarynyň sanawy. Desganyň görnüşi, Binalaryň Başlangyç Hususylaşdyrma Desgalaryň ady, № (işiniň ugry, gurlan meýdany, bahasy gyň ýerleşýän ýeri ýyly) (m²) (manat) şertleri Türkmenistanyň Söwda we daşary ykdysady aragatnaşyklar ministrliginiň desgalary Balkan welaýaty Balkan welaýat Alyjylar jemgyýetleri birleşiginiň Esenguly etrap Söwda işleri, Hususy eýeçilige 1 Alyjylar jemgyýetiniň Söwda merkezi, Esenguly etrabynyň Esenguly 737,80 1 037 362,90 2008ý. satmak şäheri. Balkan welaýat Alyjylar jemgyýetleri birleşiginiň Serdar etrap Alyjylar Ammar, Hususy eýeçilige 2 jemgyýetine degişli Ammar binasy, Serdar şäheriniň G.Meretjäýew 578,80 89 024,40 1979ý. satmak köçesiniň 9-njy jaýy. Balkan welaýat Alyjylar jemgyýetleri birleşiginiň Bereket etrap Jemgyýetçilik iýmiti, Hususy eýeçilige 3 Alyjylar jemgyýetiniň “Gülüstan” restorany, Bereket şäheriniň 1000,10 302 536,80 1976-2008ý. satmak H.Babaýew köçesi. Lebap welaýaty «Lebap» döwlet lomaý-bölek söwda firmasynyň Söwda merkezi, Söwda işleri, Hususy eýeçilige 4 569,00 35 130,00 Gazojak şäheriniň «Sazakino» demir ýol bekedi. 1978ý. satmak Lebap welaýat Alyjylar jemgyýetleri birleşiginiň Köýtendag etrap Söwda işleri, Hususy eýeçilige 5 alyjylar jemgyýetiniň Bazarly söwda merkezi, Köýtendag etrabynyň 632,90 1 787 889,60 2013ý.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkmenistan Oil and Gas
    Pre-Caspian Pipe- Central Turkmenistan Oil and Gas Map line (active) Turkmenistan Oil and Gas Map Asia-Center Pre-Caspian Pipe- Kazakhstan Gas Pipeline line (planned) Legend (to Russia) National Capital Uzbekistan Velayat Capital Population Center Sarygamysh Koli Dashovuz International Boundary Block Velayat Border 1 Garabogaz River or Canal 7 2 Oil/ Gas Pipeline 8 Transcaspian 3 Kara-Bogaz-Gol Pipeline Under Construction 9 Bay Gas Pipeline 4 DASHOVUZ Proposed Pipeline 10 VELAYAT 5 Oil/Gas Field 11 6 Gyzylgaya Protected Area 12 LEBAP Port Ufra BALKAN VELAYAT Turkmenbashi Belek VELAYAT Refinery 13 14 Cheleken Balkanabat Belek-Balkanabat- c 2011 CRUDE ACCOUNTABILITY 15 Serdar Pipeline 16 Aladzha Turkmenistan-China 24 Yerbent 17 Gas Pipeline 25 Gumdag 18 Serdar Turkmenabat 26 AHAL 19 East - West Karakum Canal VELAYAT 27 20 Ogurchinsky Pipeline Amu Darya River Island 28 29 21 22 Okarem Ashgabat 30 23 Magdanli Kerki 31 Mary Esenguly Bayramaly Caspian Tejen Sea Korpeje-Kordkuy Pipeline Iran South Yolotan- Osman Field Saragt This map is a representation of Turkmenistan’s major oil and gas fields and transport infrastructure, including ports and Dovletabat MARY Afghanistan pipeline routes, as of February 2011. As the world turns its attention to Turkmenistan’s vast petroleum reserves, more Field VELAYAT precise details about the fields are sure to become known, and—over time—it will become clear which of the proposed and hotly debated pipelines comes into existence. For now, this map demonstrates where the largest reserves are Dovletabat - located, and their relationship to population centers, environmentally protected areas, key geographical features (the Sarakhs - Caspian Sea, the Kopet Dag Mountain Range, and the Karakum Desert) and neighboring countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Analysis of Collected Basic Data of Turkmenbashi Port and Review of Port Development Projects
    JICA Study on the Turkmenistan March 2010 3. Analysis of Collected Basic Data of Turkmenbashi Port and Review of Port Development Projects 3.1 Outline of Long Term Port Development Plans In this section port development plans proposed by following studies and TMRL’s revision of these plans are summarized. (1) Feasibility Study and Basic Data Survey on the Modernization Project of Turkmenbashi International Seaport, MTLM Korea, 2009 (hereinafter referred as “Modernization Study”) (2) TRACECA Navigation Channel for Turkmenbashi Port, EU/TACIS, 2007 (hereinafter referred as “Channel Study”) 3.1.1 Modernization Study The study was carried out by the consortium headed by Hyein Engineering and Construction (Korea) based on the MOU concluded between the Government of Turkmenistan and Government of Korea. The study was funded by the Ministry of Land Transport and Maritime Affairs of Korea. The final report was submitted to TMRL in July 2009. The objective of the study was to conduct a feasibility study for the modernization project of Turkmenbashi Port, which includes the construction of a cargo terminal, passenger terminal and shipyard, by analyzing and reviewing the basic data such as soil, bathymetry, wave climate, coastal topography. The study included analysis of socio-economic circumstances and review of environmental conditions. The basic port development policies proposed by the Modernization Study are; Creation of international logistics hub, Creation of high efficiency port, Construction of multifunctional port, Improvement of the quality of waterfront and Promotion of ship building industry. In the Modernization Study, cargo traffic forecast was not carried out, and instead, growth scenarios of cargo volume were developed.
    [Show full text]
  • 49370-002: National Power Grid Strengthening Project
    Initial Environmental Examination Final Report Project No.: 49370-002 October 2020 Turkmenistan: National Power Grid Strengthening Project Volume 4 Prepared by the Ministry of Energy, Government of Turkmenistan for the Asian Development Bank. The Initial Environmental Examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. 49370-002: TKM TKM Power Sector Development Project 81. Out of these IBAs, eight IBAs are located close to phase I Transmission line alignments. Four IBAs are located close to proposed Gurtly (Ashgabat) to Balkanabat Transmission line. And four falls close to existing Sardar (West) to Dashoguz Transmission line. No IBA falls close to Dashoguz-Balkan Transmission line. The view of these IBAs with respect to transmission alignment of phase I are shown at Figure 4.17. 82. There are 8 IBAs along phase II alignment. Two IBAs, i.e. Lotfatabad & Darregaz and IBA Mergen is located at approx 6.0 km &approx 9.10 km from alignment respectively. The view of these IBAs with respect to transmission alignment of phase II is shown at Figure 4.18. : Presence of Important Bird Areas close to Proposed/existing
    [Show full text]
  • Statement on the American Citizens Held in Iran June 1, 2007
    June 1 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2007 And so I want to thank you all for joining and finger-pointing. And we’ll spend energy on a really important piece of legislation. and time and effort to help you advance It’s the right thing to do. It’s the right a really important piece of legislation for approach to take. It is right to address a the good of this country. problem. It is right to work with people I’ve come by to say thanks. Chertoff and in both political parties. It is right to argue Gutierrez can tell you how the bill has got- for what you believe and recognize that ten this far and what we see in the future. compromise might be necessary to move But I’m looking forward to signing a bill, the bill along. And it is right to take polit- and I think we will. I truly believe that ical risk for Members of the United States when people with good will and good heart Congress. and with focus on helping this country I say—I don’t think this is risky, frankly. come together, that we can get a good I don’t view this as risk reward. I frankly piece of legislation out. And I’m looking view it as doing what you ought to do. forward to signing it. I hope you’ll be there See, people ought to be running for office when I do. to do what’s right for the United States God bless.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS for the SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2015
    Case 14-1978, Document 193-1, 07/20/2016, 1820060, Page1 of 76 14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016) Docket Nos. 14‐1963(L), 14‐1967, 14‐1971, 14‐1974, 14‐1978, 14‐1982, 14‐1986, 14‐1988, 14‐1996, 14‐2098 ____________ KIRSCHENBAUM, ET AL. V. 650 FIFTH AVENUE AND RELATED PROPERTIES JASON KIRSCHENBAUM, ISABELLE KIRSCHENBAUM, on her own behalf and as Executrix of the Estate of Martin Kirschenbaum, JOSHUA KIRSCHENBAUM, DAVID KIRSCHENBAUM, DANIELLE TEITLEBAUM, Plaintiffs‐Appellees, ANNA BEER, HARRY BEER, on his own behalf and as Administrator of the Estate of Alan Beer, ESTELLE CARROLL, PHYLLIS MAISEL, Plaintiffs‐Appellees, STEVEN M. GREENBAUM, in his personal capacity and as administrator of the Estate of Judith (Shoshana) Lillian Greenbaum, ALAN HAYMAN, SHIRLEE HAYMAN, Plaintiffs‐Appellees, CARLOS ACOSTA, MARIA ACOSTA, TOVA ETTINGER, IRVING FRANKLIN, in his personal capacity and as personal representative of the estate of Irma Franklin, BARUCH KAHANE, LIBBY KAHANE, in her personal capacity and as Administratrix Case 14-1978, Document 193-1, 07/20/2016, 1820060, Page2 of 76 of the Estate of Meir Kahane, ETHEL J. GRIFFIN, as Public Administrator of the County of New York and Administratrix of the Estate of Binyamin Kahane, NORMAN KAHANE, in his personal capacity and as Executor of the Estate of Sonia Kahane, CIPORAH KAPLAN, Plaintiffs‐Appellees, EDWENA R. HEGNA, Executrix of the Estate of Charles Hegna, STEVEN A. HEGNA, LYNN MARIE HEGNA MOORE, CRAIG M.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran and the Gulf Military Balance - I
    IRAN AND THE GULF MILITARY BALANCE - I The Conventional and Asymmetric Dimensions FIFTH WORKING DRAFT By Anthony H. Cordesman and Alexander Wilner Revised July 11, 2012 Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Cordesman/Wilner: Iran & The Gulf Military Balance, Rev 5 7/11/12 2 Acknowledgements This analysis was made possible by a grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation. It draws on the work of Dr. Abdullah Toukan and a series of reports on Iran by Adam Seitz, a Senior Research Associate and Instructor, Middle East Studies, Marine Corps University. 2 Cordesman/Wilner: Iran & The Gulf Military Balance, Rev 5 7/11/12 3 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 5 THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 6 Figure III.1: Summary Chronology of US-Iranian Military Competition: 2000-2011 ............................... 8 CURRENT PATTERNS IN THE STRUCTURE OF US AND IRANIAN MILITARY COMPETITION ........................................... 13 DIFFERING NATIONAL PERSPECTIVES .............................................................................................................. 17 US Perceptions .................................................................................................................................... 17 Iranian Perceptions............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Turkmenistan's 'Golden Age' Lake
    WL KNO EDGE NCE ISM SA ER IS E A TE N K N O K C E N N T N I S E S J E N A 3 V H A A N H Z И O E P W O I T E D N E Z I A M I C O N O C C I O T N S H O E L C A I N M Z E N O T Turkmenistan’s ‘Golden Age’ Lake: a Potential Environmental Disaster Zhulduz Baizakova Republic of Kazakhstan Open Source, Foreign Perspective, Underconsidered/Understudied Topics The Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, is an open source research organization of the U.S. Army. It was founded in 1986 as an innovative program that brought together military specialists and civilian academics to focus on military and security topics derived from unclassified, foreign media. Today FMSO maintains this research tradition of special insight and highly collaborative work by conducting unclassified research on foreign perspectives of defense and security issues that are understudied or unconsidered. Author Background Zhulduz Baizakova is a graduate of the Kazakh National University and has a MSc degree in International Security and Global Governance, Birkbeck College, University of London, where she successfully defended her dissertation on NATO peacekeeping activities. She served for seven years in the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Kazakhstan, including a posting to the United Kingdom. Baizakova is currently specializing in defense and security issues in Central Asia. FMSO has provided some editing, format, and graphics to this paper to conform to organizational standards.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caspian Sea Encyclopedia
    Encyclopedia of Seas The Caspian Sea Encyclopedia Bearbeitet von Igor S. Zonn, Aleksey N Kosarev, Michael H. Glantz, Andrey G. Kostianoy 1. Auflage 2010. Buch. xi, 525 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 642 11523 3 Format (B x L): 17,8 x 25,4 cm Gewicht: 967 g Weitere Fachgebiete > Geologie, Geographie, Klima, Umwelt > Anthropogeographie > Regionalgeographie Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. B Babol – a city located 25 km from the Caspian Sea on the east–west road connecting the coastal provinces of Gilan and Mazandaran. Founded in the sixteenth century, it was once a heavy-duty river port. Since the early nineteenth century, it has been one of the major cities in the province. Ruins of some ancient buildings are found here. Food and cotton ginning factories are also located here. The population is over 283 thou as of 2006. Babol – a river flowing into the Caspian Sea near Babolsar. It originates in the Savadhuk Mountains and is one of the major rivers in Iran. Its watershed is 1,630 km2, its length is 78 km, and its width is about 50–60 m at its mouth down to 100 m upstream. Its average discharge is 16 m3/s. The river receives abundant water from snowmelt and rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of the Aral Sea Events from the 16Th to the 21St Century
    Chronology of the Aral Sea Events from the 16th to the 21st Century Years General Events 16th century 1558 An English merchant and diplomat, Anthony Jenkinson, travels through Central Asia and observes the medieval desiccation of the Aral Sea. He writes that ‘‘the water that serveth all to country is drawn by ditches out of the river Oxus [old name for Amudarya] into the great destruction of the said river, for which it falleth not into the Caspian Sea as it gath done in times past, and in short time all land is like to be destroyed, and to become a wilderness foe want of water when the river Oxus shall fail.’’ A. Jenkinson crosses the Ustyurt and visits Khiva and Bukhara, preparing a map of Central Asia. 1573 ‘‘Turn’’ of the Amudarya from the Sarykamysh to the Aral; in other words, the rather regular flow of part of its waters into the Sarykamysh ceases, the waters from this time running only to the Aral. 17th century 1627 In the book, ‘‘Knigi, glagolemoy Bolshoy Chertezh’’ (‘‘the big sketch’’), the Aral Sea is named ‘‘The dark blue sea.’’ 1670 German geographer Johann Goman publishes the map ‘‘Imperium pereicum,’’ on which the Aral is represented as a small lake located 10 German miles from the northeastern margin of the Caspian Sea. 1697 On Remezov’s map of the Aral Sea (more Aral’sko), it is for the first time represented as an internal lake completely separated from the Caspian Sea and into which the Amundarya (Amu Darya, Oxus), the Syrt (Syr Darya, Yaksart), and many small rivers flow.
    [Show full text]
  • A New World War for a New World Order
    A New World War for a New World Order The Origins of World War III: Part 3 By Andrew Gavin Marshall Region: Middle East & North Africa, Russia Global Research, December 17, 2009 and FSU, sub-Saharan Africa 17 December 2009 Theme: US NATO War Agenda This article is Part 3 in the Series, “The Origins of World War III.” Part 1: An Imperial Strategy for a New World Order: The Origins of World War III Part 2: Colour-Coded Revolutions and the Origins of World War III Introduction In Parts 1 and 2 of this series, I have analyzed US and NATO geopolitical strategy since the fall of the Soviet Union, in expanding the American empire and preventing the rise of new powers, containing Russia and China. This Part examines the implications of this strategy in recent years; following the emergence of a New Cold War, as well as analyzing the war in Georgia, the attempts and methods of regime change in Iran, the coup in Honduras, the expansion of the Afghan-Pakistan war theatre, and spread of conflict in Central Africa. These processes of a New Cold War and major regional wars and conflicts take the world closer to a New World War. Peace is only be possible if the tools and engines of empires are dismantled. Eastern Europe: Forefront of the New Cold War In 2002, the Guardian reported that, “The US military build-up in the former Soviet republics of central Asia is raising fears in Moscow that Washington is exploiting the Afghan war to establish a permanent, armed foothold in the region.” Further, “The swift construction of US military bases is also likely to ring alarm bells in Beijing.”[1] In 2004, it was reported that US strategy “is to position U.S.
    [Show full text]