DOCSLIB.ORG

B102 Kyrgyzstan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
B102 Kyrgyzstan Policy Briefing Asia Briefing N°102 Bishkek/Brussels, 27 April 2010 Kyrgyzstan: A Hollow Regime Collapses This briefing explains and analyses the events of the past I. OVERVIEW five years, in an effort to provide context and background to the uprising. Bakiyev came to power in the so-called A swift, violent rebellion swept into the Kyrgyz capital Tulip Revolution of March 2005, which ousted President Bishkek in early April 2010, sparked by anger at painful Askar Akayev, whom opposition leaders accused of nepo- utility price increases and the corruption that was the de- tism, corruption and growing authoritarianism. Once in fining characteristic of President Kurmanbek Bakiyev’s office, Bakiyev quickly abandoned most semblances of rule. In less than two days the president had fled. Some democracy, creating a narrow-based political structure 85 people were killed and the centre of the capital was run by his own family and for their profit. A combination looted. The thirteen-member provisional government now of ruthlessness and incompetence led to the regime’s faces a daunting series of challenges. Bakiyev leaves be- downfall. Almost exactly five years after his victory, Baki- hind a bankrupt state hollowed out by corruption and crime. yev was charged with the same abuses as Akayev had been, Economic failure and collapsing infrastructure have gen- by many of the same people with whom he had staged the erated deep public resentment. If the provisional govern- 2005 “revolution”. ment moves fast to assert its power, the risks of major long-term violence are containable: there are no signs of Despite the much-discussed theory that Moscow instigated extensive support for Bakiyev or of a North-South split. or stage-managed the uprising, the evidence at this point The speed with which the Bakiyev administration col- does not support this view. For its part, the U.S., in its lapsed is a salutary reminder of the risks of overemphasis- concern to maintain the Manas air base as a major hub for ing Western security concerns in framing policy towards the war in Afghanistan, was unwilling to counter the Baki- the region. yev regime’s increasingly abusive behaviour. So far the provisional government’s perfomance has not The fundamental lessons that can be drawn from the events been promising. Its members have largely failed to pre- of April 2010 are clear. First, the authoritarian model of sent themselves as a cohesive or coherent administration, government has not worked in Kyrgyzstan, and is unlikely or to be transparent about their activities at a time of great in the long run to work in the rest of Central Asia. Its su- anxiety and uncertainty. They have displayed a lack of perficial stability is attractive to Western leaders who are common ideology or strategy, and show signs of internal looking for a safe environment to pursue commercial or discord. Unless they quickly address these problems, they security interests, such as the current effort to prosecute risk a rapid erosion of their authority. the war in Afghanistan. But the deep-seated and invisible instabilities of authoritarian regimes remove all predict- Though their declared aim is to stabilise the country in ability. A well-defended government, seemingly without preparation for parliamentary and presidential elections a coherent challenge from its political opponents and apa- six months from now, the provisional government has to thetic populace, can be swept away in a day. By blocking do much more. They must prepare people for the multiple all social safety valves – the media, public dissent, politi- crises – in the energy sector, for example – that could cal discourse and the right to legal redress – the Bakiyev flare up at any time due to the neglect and pillaging of the regime created a semblance of calm. But it was unable to country’s infrastructure. They have to take urgent meas- control the underground currents of anger at the regime’s ures to ensure that organised crime or the narcotics trade rapacity. The closure of all other channels of change made do not again infiltrate political life. They need to begin a violent response just about the only option for an angry talking to devout Muslims – an increasingly alienated part population. of society who seem to have been largely bystanders in the April 2010 revolt. They will also need to convince Second, the causes of the uprising – state theft and re- donors that they can absorb aid. This is no small task, pression, a total lack of interest by rulers in their people – given the top-down corruption of the system of govern- are common to all of Kyrgyzstan’s neighbours. The col- ment they have inherited. They will, finally, have to move lapse of the Bakiyev regime is a case study of the risks rapidly to reassure the public that they are willing and facing authoritarianism in Central Asia. What happened able to work for the country’s good, not just their own en- in Kyrgyzstan in terms of corruption and repression is richment. already taking place in several other countries. What hap- Kyrgyzstan: A Hollow Regime Collapses Crisis Group Asia Briefing N°102, 27 April 2010 Page 2 pened in Bishkek in April 2010 could happen in most of inaccurately named the Tulip Revolution – a reflection of its neighbours. It could indeed be much worse. the effort by Western politicians and journalists to discern a wave of liberal democratic revolutions from angry pro- Central Asia’s leaders will probably ignore this warning, tests in Ukraine, Georgia and Kyrgyzstan. In Bishkek, but at their peril. The international community needs, in power passed to a loose and friable coalition of strong- its interest and that of long-term stability, to change its minded individuals and their mostly small political parties.5 approach of public silence leavened by the discreet word Many of its members re-emerged in April 2010, to lead in the ear of the autocrat. It can start by conducting its re- the final protests that overthrew their erstwhile ally. lations with undemocratic regimes in an explicit, open way, where issues of social justice and development are In 2005 the victorious coalition quickly splintered and given parity with the more classic concerns of security or Kurmanbek Bakiyev emerged as the key figure.6 Perhaps trade – or at least expressed sufficiently in word and deed the least charismatic of that year’s “revolutionaries”, that the people know their conditions are part of the bilat- Bakiyev demonstrated a quiet tenacity, increasingly cou- eral equation. Authoritarian and unresponsive regimes are pled as the years went on with ruthlessness. His first not only embarrassing allies, but unreliable ones. A sud- years were chaotic, as his former allies challenged him on den push to try to create democracy in a few years from the streets of the capital and in late 2006 came close to zero is too ambitious. Speaking truth to regional powers overthrowing him. Defusing the protests by putting down would be a good start. the demonstrations and co-opting some of their leaders, he consolidated his position. The media was increasingly limited and harassed, and the regime quickly developed a II. THE RISE OF A ONE-FAMILY STATE reputation for corruption. The president’s sons and brothers took over many of the The history of the Bakiyev regime1 is one of a quest to business interests of the Akayev family. One developed a reshape a free-wheeling system of state corruption2 and reputation for “raiding” promising companies.7 U.S. and authoritarianism in a way that maximised political control Western officials, meanwhile, strongly suspected that top and financial gain. As President Bakiyev settled into office members of the new elite, mostly connected to the police in 2005, his political system became increasingly synony- or security structures, were playing a major role in pro- mous not only with him, but with his family, and espe- tecting narcotics shipments that passed through Kyrgyzstan cially his younger son, Maxim, described by an adviser to on their way from Afghanistan to markets in Europe, Rus- the presidential administration as a “pathologically” ac- sia and China. One of the president’s brothers, Marat,8 quisitive young man who “dreams of wealth and power”.3 reportedly supervised the judicial system, both in terms of the appointment of judges and the outcome of court cases. A. EARLY DAYS The street demonstrations that swept President Askar Akayev4 from office in late March 2005 were quickly and were identical to those made against Bakiyev in 2010 – nepo- tism, corruption, growing authoritarianism. 5 For futher information on this period, see in particular Crisis 1 For more information see Crisis Group Asia Report N°97, Group Report, Kyrgyzstan: After the Revolution, op. cit. Kyrgyzstan: After the Revolution, 4 May 2005; Asia Report 6 Some stayed on in high positions, or moved between govern- N°109, Kyrgyzstan: A Faltering State, 16 December 2005; Asia ment and opposition. For example, Almaz Atambayev – a Briefing N°55, Kyrgyzstan on the Edge, 9 November 2006; leader of the 2005 “revolution”, opposition presidential candi- Asia Briefing N°79, Kyrgyzstan: A Deceptive Calm, 14 August date in 2009, and senior member of the 2010 provisional gov- 2008. For a detailed examination of specific problems, see Asia ernment – was at varying times both a minister and prime min- Report N°118, Kyrgyzstan’s Prison System Nightmare, 16 Au- ister under President Bakiyev. gust 2006; Asia Report N°150, Kyrgyzstan: The Challenge of 7 Raid in this context means forcing owners to sell their busi- Judicial Reform, 10 April 2008; and Asia Report N°176, ness at below value prices, or face investigation by the tax po- Women and Radicalistion in Kyrgyzstan, 3 September 2009.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    24th Deutsche Schule Athen Model United Nations | 22nd-24th October 2021 Forum: Special Political and Decolonization Committee (GA4) Issue: The current political situation in Kyrgyzstan Student Officer: Chris Moustakis Position: Main Chair INTRODUCTION “A country without solid borders is like a house without solid walls – it is bound to collapse”. Kyrgyzstan is a nation located in Central Asia. It is bordered by Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and China. Its capital and largest city is Bishkek. Surprisingly, despite the state of solitude that one would assume the nation had throughout history (primarily due to its mountainous terrain and location), it has hosted countless civilizations throughout history, albeit temporarily. It served as a crossroads, as it was part of the Silk Road, a network of trade routes connecting the East and the West. On the 31st of August 1991, Kyrgyzstan declared independence from Moscow and formed a democratic government. It then attained sovereignty as a nation state, following the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991. Ever since then, Kyrgyzstan has remained (at least officially) a unitary presidential republic. Despite this, the nation itself hasn’t been stable since independence. It undergoes ethnic disputes, revolts, transitional governments, political conflict and even economic crisis. To top it all off, on the 28th of April 2021 began a border conflict between Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. The reason for this is rather debatable, as there are multiple theories. Figure 1: A map of the area of Kyrgyzstan and its neighboring nations.1 As the situation was addressed by Russia, the nation is “without leadership” and “chaotic”. It is undeniable that Kyrgyzstan has not had political stability ever since its independence.
    [Show full text]
  • The 'Colorful' Revolution of Kyrgyzstan: Democratic Transition
    The ‘Colorful’ Revolution of Kyrgyzstan: Democratic Transition or Global Competition? Yilmaz Bingol* This paper aims to analyze the reasons behind the recent revolution of Kyrgyzstan. I will argue that explaining the revolution through just the rhetoric of “democracy and freedom” needs to be reassessed, as comparing with its geo-cultural environment; Kyrgyzstan had been the most democratic of Central Asian republics. Thus, the paper argues that global competition between US and China-Russia should seriously be taken under consideration as a landmark reason behind the Kyrgyz revolution. The “Rose Revolution” in Georgia and the “Orange Revolution” in Ukraine followed by yet another “colorful” revolution in Kyrgyzstan in the March of 2005. A group of opposition who were dissatisfied with the result of the Parliamentary Election taken place on February 27th and March 13th of 2005 upraised against incumbent regime of Askar Akayev. Accusing the incumbent regime with the felony and asking for more democracy and freedom, the opposition took over Akayev from the power and closed the last stage of the colorful revolution of Kyrgyzstan on March 24-25, 2005. Common characteristics of all these colorful revolutionist were that they all used rhetoric of “democracy and freedom,” and that they were all pro-western especially pro-American. It seems that it has become a tradition in the West to call such revolutions with the colorful names. This tradition may trace back to Samuel Huntington’s famous “third wave democracy” which was started with “Carnation Revolution” of Portugal in 1974. As Western politicians and academicians have often used such “colorful” names for post-communist and post-Soviet cases since then, they must have regarded these revolutions as the extension of what Huntington has called the “third wave”.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hollow Regime Collapses
    Policy Briefing Asia Briefing N°102 Bishkek/Brussels, 27 April 2010 Kyrgyzstan: A Hollow Regime Collapses This briefing explains and analyses the events of the past I. OVERVIEW five years, in an effort to provide context and background to the uprising. Bakiyev came to power in the so-called A swift, violent rebellion swept into the Kyrgyz capital Tulip Revolution of March 2005, which ousted President Bishkek in early April 2010, sparked by anger at painful Askar Akayev, whom opposition leaders accused of nepo- utility price increases and the corruption that was the de- tism, corruption and growing authoritarianism. Once in fining characteristic of President Kurmanbek Bakiyev’s office, Bakiyev quickly abandoned most semblances of rule. In less than two days the president had fled. Some democracy, creating a narrow-based political structure 85 people were killed and the centre of the capital was run by his own family and for their profit. A combination looted. The thirteen-member provisional government now of ruthlessness and incompetence led to the regime’s faces a daunting series of challenges. Bakiyev leaves be- downfall. Almost exactly five years after his victory, Baki- hind a bankrupt state hollowed out by corruption and crime. yev was charged with the same abuses as Akayev had been, Economic failure and collapsing infrastructure have gen- by many of the same people with whom he had staged the erated deep public resentment. If the provisional govern- 2005 “revolution”. ment moves fast to assert its power, the risks of major long-term violence are containable: there are no signs of Despite the much-discussed theory that Moscow instigated extensive support for Bakiyev or of a North-South split.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyzstan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests
    Kyrgyzstan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests Jim Nichol Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs August 30, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov 97-690 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Kyrgyzstan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests Summary Kyrgyzstan is a small and poor Central Asian country that gained independence in 1991 with the breakup of the Soviet Union. The United States has been interested in helping Kyrgyzstan to enhance its sovereignty and territorial integrity, bolster economic reform and development, strengthen human rights, prevent weapons proliferation, and more effectively combat transnational terrorism and trafficking in persons and narcotics. Special attention long has been placed on bolstering civil society and democratization in what has appeared to be the most receptive—but still challenging—political and social environment in Central Asia. The significance of Kyrgyzstan to the United States increased after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States. Kyrgyzstan offered to host U.S. forces at an airbase at the Manas international airport outside of the capital, Bishkek, and it opened in December 2001. The U.S. military repaired and later upgraded the air field for aerial refueling, airlift and airdrop, medical evacuation, and support for U.S. and coalition personnel and cargo transiting in and out of Afghanistan. The Kyrgyz government threatened to close down the airbase in early 2009, but renewed the lease on the airbase (renamed the Manas Transit Center) in June 2009 after the United States agreed to higher lease and other payments. President Almazbek Atambayev and the legislature have stated that the basing agreement will not be renewed when it expires in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hollow Regime Collapses
    Policy Briefing Asia Briefing N°102 Bishkek/Brussels, 27 April 2010 Kyrgyzstan: A Hollow Regime Collapses This briefing explains and analyses the events of the past I. OVERVIEW five years, in an effort to provide context and background to the uprising. Bakiyev came to power in the so-called A swift, violent rebellion swept into the Kyrgyz capital Tulip Revolution of March 2005, which ousted President Bishkek in early April 2010, sparked by anger at painful Askar Akayev, whom opposition leaders accused of nepo- utility price increases and the corruption that was the de- tism, corruption and growing authoritarianism. Once in fining characteristic of President Kurmanbek Bakiyev’s office, Bakiyev quickly abandoned most semblances of rule. In less than two days the president had fled. Some democracy, creating a narrow-based political structure 85 people were killed and the centre of the capital was run by his own family and for their profit. A combination looted. The thirteen-member provisional government now of ruthlessness and incompetence led to the regime’s faces a daunting series of challenges. Bakiyev leaves be- downfall. Almost exactly five years after his victory, Baki- hind a bankrupt state hollowed out by corruption and crime. yev was charged with the same abuses as Akayev had been, Economic failure and collapsing infrastructure have gen- by many of the same people with whom he had staged the erated deep public resentment. If the provisional govern- 2005 “revolution”. ment moves fast to assert its power, the risks of major long-term violence are containable: there are no signs of Despite the much-discussed theory that Moscow instigated extensive support for Bakiyev or of a North-South split.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Official Records Fifty-Eighth Session
    United Nations A/58/PV.21 General Assembly Official Records Fifty-eighth session 21st plenary meeting Thursday, 2 October 2003, 10 a.m. New York President: The Hon. Julian R. Hunte .................................. (Saint Lucia) The meeting was called to order at 10.05 a.m. As life has demonstrated, the United Nations plays a highly positive role in organizing the common Address by Mr. Askar Akayev, President of the struggle against international terrorism. In this regard, Kyrgyz Republic the idea of giving the United Nations the lead role in guiding the global anti-terrorist coalition deserves The President: The Assembly will now hear an genuine support. One of the primary objectives of my address by the President of the Kyrgyz Republic. statement last year was to appeal to the United Nations Mr. Askar Akayev, President of the Kyrgyz to recognize, as a great event in the history of my Republic, was escorted into the General Assembly country, the two thousand, two hundredth anniversary Hall. of Kyrgyz Statehood, as an event of international status. The President: On behalf of the General Assembly, I have the honour to welcome to the United The resolution of the General Assembly on Nations His Excellency Mr. Askar Akayev, President of Kyrgyz Statehood was a powerful force in raising the the Kyrgyz Republic, and to invite him to address the national spirit of our people. For that, we are sincerely Assembly. grateful to our Organization. Indeed, whenever any problems emerge at a global level, we turn to the President Akayev (spoke in Russian): First of United Nations and unfailingly get support.
    [Show full text]
  • 東中jr09004 中央アジア概況調査-En 0
    No. Regional and Country Profile: Central Asia, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyz Republic and Tajikistan June 2009 Japan Interntional Cooperation Agency OPMAC Corporation 東中 JR 09-004 Outline of the Study 1-1 Backgrounds Bordered by Asia to the east and Europe to the west, Central Asia occupies a vital position in the Eurasian Continent. Possessing abundant underground reserves of petroleum, gas, gold, uranium ore and other underground resources, and occupying a strategically vital geopolitical location, Central Asia has historically been the focus of competing interests by various powers. Central Asia is surrounded by the superpowers of Russia and China, and today is affected by regional instability in the neighboring Middle East, Afghanistan and Pakistan, etc. Especially in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States in 2001, worldwide attention has been directed towards the stability and development of the whole South Asian region including this area and Afghanistan, and vested interests have become increasingly complicated. Moreover, against a background of growing energy demand in China, India and other parts of Asia, the stable supply of petroleum and natural gas from Central Asia helps stabilize the international energy market and enhances regional importance from the viewpoint of energy security too. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the republics of Central Asia respectively gained independence, and a number of regional organizations, i.e. the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and Eurasia Economic Community (EAEC), etc. were established under a mélange of economic, diplomatic and military interests in Central Asia and environs. Concerning relations with Japan, the concept of Silk Road Diplomacy was enunciated in 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • BA Country Report of Kyrgyzstan Part 1 Macro Level
    Informal Governance and Corruption – Transcending the Principal Agent and Collective Action Paradigms Kyrgyzstan Country Report Part 1 Macro Level Aksana Ismailbekova | July 2018 Basel Institute on Governance Steinenring 60 | 4051 Basel, Switzerland | +41 61 205 55 11 [email protected] | www.baselgovernance.org BASEL INSTITUTE ON GOVERNANCE This research has been funded by the UK government's Department for International Development (DFID) and the British Academy through the British Academy/DFID Anti-Corruption Evidence Programme. However, the views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the British Academy or DFID. Dr Aksana Ismailbekova, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Advokatenweg 36 06114 Halle (Saale), Germany, [email protected] 1 BASEL INSTITUTE ON GOVERNANCE Table of contents Abstract 3 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Informal Governance and Corruption: Rationale and project background 4 1.2 Informal governance in Kyrgyzstan 4 1.3 Conceptual approach 6 1.4 Research design and methods 6 2 Informal governance and the lineage associations: 1991–2005 7 2.1 Askar Akaev and the transition to Post-Soviet governance regime 7 2.2 Co-optation: Political family networks 8 2.3 Control: social sanctions, demonstrative punishment and selective law enforcement 11 2.4 Camouflage: the illusion of inclusive democracy and charitable contributions 13 2.5 The Tulip Revolution and the collapse of the Akaev networks 13 3 Epoch of Bakiev from 2005–2010 14 3.1 Network re-accommodation in the aftermath of the Tulip Revolution
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyzstan | Freedom House
    Kyrgyzstan | Freedom House http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2012/kyrgyzstan About Us DONATE Blog Contact Us REGIONS ISSUES Reports Programs Initiatives News Experts Events Donate FREEDOM IN THE WORLD Kyrgyzstan Kyrgyzstan Freedom in the World 2012 OVERVIEW: 2012 A three-party coalition that governed for most of the year brought SCORES greater stability to Kyrgyzstan in 2011, and a competitive presidential election in October led to Central Asia’s first voluntary transfer of power, STATUS with interim president Roza Otunbayeva standing down as scheduled. Despite greater openness and political competition, however, serious Partly flaws remained in the treatment of national minorities, due process, prevention of and accountability for torture, and judicial independence. Free FREEDOM RATING Shortly after Kyrgyzstan gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, Askar Akayev, a respected physicist, was elected president. He easily won 5.0 reelection in 1995, and constitutional amendments the following year CIVIL LIBERTIES substantially increased the powers of the presidency. International observers noted serious irregularities in the 2000 parliamentary and presidential elections, 5 which yielded another term for Akayev. Long-standing frustrations in the economically depressed and politically POLITICAL RIGHTS marginalized south culminated in public protests in 2002. Six protesters were killed when police fired into a crowd in the village of Aksy. Although several 5 prosecutors and police officials were eventually convicted and sentenced to prison, opposition critics continued to argue that senior officials who authorized the use of force were never brought to justice. After flawed February 2005 parliamentary elections, thousands of demonstrators protested irregularities and ultimately called for Akayev’s resignation.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and the Secular State in Kyrgyzstan
    Religion and the Secular State in Kyrgyzstan Johan Engvall SILK ROAD PAPER June 2020 Religion and the Secular State in Kyrgyzstan Johan Engvall © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center American Foreign Policy Council, 509 C St NE, Washington D.C. Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Religion and the Secular State in Kyrgyzstan” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program, Joint Center. The Silk Road Papers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, which addresses topical and timely subjects. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council and the Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia-Caucasus
    Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst BI-WEEKLY BRIEFING VOL. 13 NO. 17 21 SEPTEMBER 2011 Searchable Archives with over 1,500 articles at http://www.cacianalyst.org ANALYTICAL ARTICLES: FIELD REPORTS: AFGHANISTAN’S RAILROAD FRENZY Nicklas Norling NEW GAS FIELD DISCOVERED IN AZERBAIJAN Mina Muradova AZERBAIJAN SET TO SELL GAS TO IRAN INCREASES INFLUENCE IN TAJIKISTAN UKRAINE AT RUSSIA’S EXPENSE Robert M. Cutler Suhrob Majidov THE ROLE OF CONVERTS IN NORTH GEORGIA AND RUSSIA CONTINUE WTO CAUCASIAN TERRORISM TALKS Dmitry Shlapentokh Maka Gurgenidze CENTRAL ASIAN WORRIES IN BEIJING KYRGYZSTAN LAUNCHES PRESIDENTIAL CAN- DIDATE REGISTRATION Richard Weitz Joldosh Osmonov NEWS DIGEST Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst BI-WEEKLY BRIEFING VOL. 13 NO. 17 21 SEPTEMBER 2011 Contents Analytical Articles AFGHANISTAN’S RAILROAD FRENZY 3 Nicklas Norling AZERBAIJAN SET TO SELL GAS TO UKRAINE 6 Robert M. Cutler THE ROLE OF CONVERTS IN NORTH CAUCASIAN TERRORISM 9 Dmitry Shlapentokh CENTRAL ASIAN WORRIES IN BEIJING 12 Richard Weitz Field Reports NEW GAS FIELD DISCOVERED IN AZERBAIJAN 15 Mina Muradova IRAN INCREASES INFLUENCE IN TAJIKISTAN AT RUSSIA’S EXPENSE 16 Suhrob Majidov GEORGIA AND RUSSIA CONTINUE WTO TALKS 18 Maka Gurgenidze KYRGYZSTAN LAUNCHES PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE REGISTRATION 19 Joldosh Osmonov News Digest 21 THE CENTRAL ASIA-CAUCASUS ANALYST Editor: Svante E. Cornell Associate Editor: Niklas Nilsson Assistant Editor, News Digest: Alima Bissenova Chairman, Editorial Board: S. Frederick Starr The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is an English-language journal devoted to analysis of the current issues facing Central Asia and the Caucasus. It serves to link the business, governmental, journalistic and scholarly communities and is the global voice of the Central Asia- Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program Joint Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy in Kyrgyzstan: Problems and Specific Features
    Democracy in Kyrgyzstan: problems and specific features Zhyldyz Urmanbetova1 1The Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. [email protected] Abstract The article examines the state of democracy in the Kyrgyz Republic, with an emphasis on understanding democracy through the lens of the political consciousness, social memory and spiritual and cultural values of the Central Asian republic via comparative and typological methods. The result of the article shows the struggle between the new political culture and the traditional political order, which channels the democracy development in a specific direction. In conclusion, it may be reasonable to study further the existence of the hybrid regime as it applies to the situation in Kyrgyzstan before the transition to a parliamentary government. Keywords: Civil Society, Democracy, National Will. Democracia en Kirguistán: problemas y características específicas Resumen El artículo examina el estado de la democracia en la República Kirguisa, con énfasis en entender la democracia a través de la conciencia política, la memoria social y los valores espirituales y culturales de la República de Asia Central a través de métodos comparativos y tipológicos. El resultado del artículo muestra la lucha entre la nueva cultura política y el orden político tradicional, que canaliza el desarrollo de la democracia en una dirección específica. En conclusión, puede ser razonable estudiar más a fondo la existencia del régimen híbrido según se aplica a la situación en Kirguistán antes de la transición a un gobierno parlamentario. Palabras clave: sociedad civil, democracia, voluntad nacional. 1. Introduction The Kyrgyz Republic is considered to be the most democratic state in Central Asia and the country that is least susceptible to authoritarian tendencies.
    [Show full text]