Front Matter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Front Matter Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02723-7 - The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution Leslie McCall Frontmatter More information The Undeserving Rich American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution It is widely assumed that Americans care little about income inequality, believe opportunities abound, admire the rich, and dislike redistributive policies. Leslie McCall contends that such assumptions are based on incomplete survey data and economic conditions of the past rather than present. In fact, Americans have desired less inequality for decades, and McCall’s book explains why. Americans become most concerned about inequality in times of inequitable growth, when they view the rich as prospering while opportunities for good jobs, fair pay, and high-quality education are restricted for everyone else. As a result, they tend to favor policies to expand opportunity and redistribute earnings in the workplace, reducing inequality in the market rather than redistributing income after the fact with tax and spending policies. This book resolves the paradox of how Americans can at times express little enthusiasm for welfare state policies and still yearn for a more equitable society, and forwards a new model of preferences about income inequality rooted in labor market opportunities rather than welfare state policies. Leslie McCall is Professor of Sociology and Political Science, as well as Faculty Fellow at the Institute for Policy Research, at Northwestern University. She is the author of Complex Inequality: Gender, Class, and Race in the New Economy (2001). Her work on economic inequal- ity has been published in the American Sociological Review, Annual Review of Sociology, Demography, Economic Geography, Perspectives on Politics, Signs,andSocio-Economic Review, as well as in several edited volumes. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02723-7 - The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution Leslie McCall Frontmatter More information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02723-7 - The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution Leslie McCall Frontmatter More information The Undeserving Rich American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution LESLIE MCCALL Northwestern University © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02723-7 - The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution Leslie McCall Frontmatter More information cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo, Delhi, Mexico City Cambridge University Press 32 Avenue of the Americas, New York, ny 10013-2473, usa www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107699823 C Leslie McCall 2013 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2013 Printed in the United States of America A catalog record for this publication is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data McCall, Leslie, 1964– author. The undeserving rich : American beliefs about inequality, opportunity, and redistribution / Leslie McCall, Northwestern University. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-1-107-02723-7 (hardback) – isbn 978-1-107-69982-3 (paperback) 1. Income distribution – United States. 2. Equality – United States. 3. United States – Economic conditions. I. Title. hc110.i5m374 2013 339.220973–dc23 2012037611 isbn 978-1-107-02723-7 Hardback isbn 978-1-107-69982-3 Paperback Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of urls for external or third-party internet web sites referred to in this publication and does not guarantee that any content on such web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02723-7 - The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution Leslie McCall Frontmatter More information Contents Tables and Figures page vii Preface and Acknowledgments xi Introduction: Thinking about Income Inequality 1 1 Beyond the Opposition between Opportunity and Inequality: Theories of American Beliefs about Inequality from the Nineteenth Century to the Present 21 2 The Emergence of a New Social Issue: Media Coverage of Economic Inequality and Social Class in the United States, 1980–2010 53 3 American Beliefs about Income Inequality: What, When, Who, and Why? 96 4 Why Do Americans Care about Income Inequality? The Role of Opportunity 137 5 Americans’ Social Policy Preferences in the Era of Rising Inequality 186 Conclusion: A New Era of Beliefs about Inequality 219 Notes 233 References 277 Index 293 v © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02723-7 - The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution Leslie McCall Frontmatter More information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02723-7 - The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution Leslie McCall Frontmatter More information Tables and Figures Tables 2.1 Defining media coverage of economic inequality. page 61 2.2 Distribution of subject terms in articles on themes of social class and job insecurity. 75 3.1 Adjusted marginal effects of optimism about intragenerational upward mobility on three questions about beliefs regarding income inequality, 1987 to 2010. 115 A3.1 Marginal distributions of three questions about beliefs regarding income inequality by year, 1987 to 2010. 131 A3.2 Linear regression effects on an additive index of three questions about beliefs regarding income inequality, 1987 to 2010. 132 A3.3 Coding and sample means for dependent and independent variables. 133 A3.4 Year effects on three questions about beliefs regarding income inequality, 1987 to 2010. 135 4.1 Five tropes of opportunity. 141 4.2 Marginal distributions of questions about the importance of individual and structural factors in getting ahead. 151 4.3 Joint distribution of beliefs about getting ahead through hard work and social advantages. 154 4.4 Trends in perceived and desired pay and pay ratios for executives and unskilled workers, 1987 to 2010. 160 vii © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02723-7 - The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution Leslie McCall Frontmatter More information viii Tables and Figures 4.5 Adjusted marginal effects of beliefs about occupational pay inequality on three questions about beliefs regarding income inequality, 1987 to 2010. 165 4.6 Support for equal opportunity, rights, chances, and treatment, 1984 to 2008. 176 4.7 Estimates of the relationship among beliefs about social groups, social group–based inequality, egalitarianism, and income inequality. 179 A4.1 Adjusted marginal effects of beliefs about bootstraps and equal treatment opportunity on three questions about beliefs regarding income inequality, 1987 to 2010. 185 5.1 Public opinion polls regarding top-end pay and policies to regulate high-paying industries. 211 Figures 2.1 Number of newsweekly articles from Time, Newsweek, and USNWR with subject terms on themes of economic inequality, social class, and job insecurity, 1980 to 2010. 69 2.2 Weighted number of newsweekly articles from Time, Newsweek, and USNWR on themes of economic inequality, 1980 to 2010. 82 C2.1 Weighted number of newsweekly articles from Time, Newsweek, and USNWR on various themes, 1980 to 2010. 95 3.1 Pooled responses to three questions about beliefs regarding income inequality, 1987 to 2010. 101 3.2 Trends in agreement to three questions about beliefs regarding income inequality, 1987 to 2010. 102 3.3 Adjusted trends in strong agreement to three questions about beliefs regarding income inequality, 1987 to 2010. 108 3.4 Adjusted trends in strong agreement that income differences are too large by income and political ideology, 1987 to 2010. 111 3.5 Trends in responses to a question about intragenerational upward mobility, 1987 to 2010. 114 3.6 Trends in average monthly unemployment rate and index of consumer sentiment, April to March, 1981 to 2010. 117 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-02723-7 - The Undeserving Rich: American Beliefs about Inequality, Opportunity, and Redistribution Leslie McCall Frontmatter More information Tables and Figures ix 3.7 Trends in income inequality and median wages, 1980 to 2009. 121 3.8 Trends in newsweekly articles on themes of economic inequality, April to March, 1981 to 2010. 124 4.1 Trends in beliefs about the most important reason for getting ahead in life, 1973 to 2010. 148 4.2 Adjusted effects of beliefs about getting ahead on strong agreement to three questions about beliefs regarding income inequality, 1987 to 2010. 149 4.3 Adjusted effects of beliefs about bootstraps and
Recommended publications
  • Ess 2021 Preliminary Program
    ESS 2021 PRELIMINARY PROGRAM Diversity and Its Discontents in the Wake of COVID-19 February 18-21, 2021 THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2021 PRE-CONFERENCE Community College Spotlight Organizers & Myron Strong (Community College of Baltimore County) & EC ESS Moderators Vondora Wilson-Corzen (Nassau Community College) 10:15-11:45 AM Pre-Conference Session I Panelists Kaya Hamer-Small (Broward College), Quakish Liner (Broward College), and Christy Moran (Broward College) – “Teaching Social Justice and Information Literacy During COVID-19” Tanya Cook (Community College of Aurora) – “Do We Really Need Due Dates? Reconsidering Structure and Agency During the Pandemic” 12:00-1:30 PM Pre-Conference Session II Panelists James McKeever (Pierce College) – “Responses to COVID-19” Nelda Nix-McCray (Community College of Baltimore County) – “I Can See Clearly Now: Viewing Racial Constructs” Shenique Davis (Borough of Manhattan Community College) – “Conducting Research in the Age of COVID-19” ESS CONFERENCE 1:45-3:15 PM Disability as an Axis of Inequality in the Wake of COVID-19 Organizers Allison Carey (Shippensburg University), Laura Mauldin (University of Connecticut) Moderator Laura Maudlin (University of Connecticut) Panelists Rachel Elizabeth Fish (New York University) – Inequality in Special Education under COVID-19 Scott Landes (Syracuse University) – “COVID-19 Trends Among Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD) Living in Residential Group Homes in New York State through November, 2020” ESS 2021 Preliminary Program – 1 Michelle
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CURRICULUM VITAE Leslie Mccall Department of Sociology 1810 Chicago Avenue Northwestern University Evanston, IL 60208-1330
    CURRICULUM VITAE Leslie McCall Department of Sociology 1810 Chicago Avenue Northwestern University Evanston, IL 60208-1330 [email protected] http://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/faculty-experts/fellows/mccall.html EDUCATION 1995 Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Sociology 1990 M.A., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Sociology 1986 B.A., Brown University, Departments of Computer Science and Third World Development Studies POSITIONS HELD 2013- Professor, Northwestern University 2012- Courtesy Appointment, Department of Political Science 2010-2014 Director of Undergraduate Studies, Department of Sociology 2006- Faculty Fellow, Institute for Policy Research 2006-2013 Associate Professor, Northwestern University, Department of Sociology 2001-2006 Associate Professor, Rutgers University 1995-2001 Assistant Professor, Rutgers University Department of Sociology (75%)/Women’s Studies Program (25%) AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Social Inequality and Demography: Gender, Class, and Race; Political Sociology; Economic Sociology; Social Theory; Methodology AWARDS, HONORS, AND MEMBERSHIPS 2012-2013 Public Voices Fellowship, Northwestern University 2012 Visiting Scholar, Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris (Sciences Po) 2011- Elected Member, Sociological Research Association 2010-2013 Board Member, General Social Survey 2009 Best Article Award, 2008, Socio-Economic Review 2008-2009 Visiting Scholar, Center for the Study of Democratic Politics, Princeton University 2008-2013 Editorial Boards, Sociological Theory, Socio-Economic Review, Social Politics 2006- Fellow, Center for the Study of Poverty & Inequality, Stanford University 2005-2007 Member, National Science Foundation Sociology Advisory Panel 2003-2004 Faculty Fellow, Rutgers Center for the Critical Analysis of Contemporary Culture 2003-2005 Editorial Board, American Sociological Review 2002-2003 Senior Fellow, Demos: A Network of Ideas and Action 2002 First Runner-up, C.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CURRICULUM VITAE Leslie Mccall
    CURRICULUM VITAE Leslie McCall Department of Sociology The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY) 365 Fifth Avenue, Room 6112.09 New York, New York 10016 [email protected] http://www.gc.cuny.edu/stonecenter/Leslie-McCall EDUCATION 1995 Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Sociology 1990 M.A., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Sociology 1986 B.A., Brown University, Departments of Computer Science and Economic Development Studies POSITIONS HELD 2017 Presidential Professor, Departments of Sociology and Political Science Associate Director, Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY) 2013- Professor, Northwestern University 2012- Courtesy Appointment, Department of Political Science 2010-2015 Director of Undergraduate Studies, Department of Sociology 2006- Faculty Fellow, Institute for Policy Research 2006-2013 Associate Professor, Northwestern University, Department of Sociology 2001-2006 Associate Professor, Rutgers University 1995-2001 Assistant Professor, Rutgers University Department of Sociology (75%)/Women’s Studies Program (25%) AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Social Inequality and Demography: Gender, Class, and Race; Political Sociology; Economic Sociology; Social Theory; Methodology AWARDS, HONORS, AND MEMBERSHIPS 2017 Member, Social Inequality Advisory Committee, Russell Sage Foundation 2016 Associate Principal Investigator, TESS (Time-Sharing Experiments in the Social Sciences) 2016 MIEM Fellowship, School of Public Affairs, Sciences Po,
    [Show full text]
  • Americans' Social Policy Preferences in the Era of Rising Inequality
    | | ⅜ Articles Americans’ Social Policy Preferences in the Era of Rising Inequality Leslie McCall and Lane Kenworthy Rising income inequality has been a defining trend of the past generation, yet we know little about its impact on social policy formation. We evaluate two dominant views about public opinion on rising inequality: that Americans do not care much about inequality of outcomes, and that a rise in inequality will lead to an increase in demand for government redistribution. Using time series data on views about income inequality and social policy preferences in the 1980s and 1990s from the General Social Survey, we find little support for these views. Instead, Americans do tend to object to inequality and increasingly believe government should act to redress it, but not via traditional redistributive programs. We examine several alternative possibilities and provide a broad analytical framework for reinterpreting social policy preferences in the era of rising inequality. Our evidence suggests that Americans may be unsure or uninformed about how to address rising inequality and thus swayed by contemporaneous debates. However, we also find that Americans favor expanding education spending in response to their increasing concerns about inequality.This suggests that equal opportunity may be more germane than income redistribution to our understanding of the politics of inequality. ising income inequality has been a defining trend of discuss further—we think there are theoretical limitations the past generation, yet we know little about its at play as well. There is a rich and nuanced literature on R impact on social policy formation. The American American views about inequality, opportunity, and gov- ⅜ Political Science Association’s recent Task Force on Inequal- ernment redistribution, but only two views are on display ity and American Democracy emphasized the importance in the discussion of public opinion on rising inequality, of this question in its summary report and subsequent and both have led to dead ends.
    [Show full text]
  • Leslie Mccall Northwestern University March, 2015
    “Political and Policy Responses to Problems of Inequality and Opportunity: Past, Present, and Future” Prepared for the Restoring Opportunity in America Project Educational Testing Service Leslie McCall Northwestern University March, 2015 Introduction Those of us who have grown up in the United States tend to have a pretty good handle on American culture. But for one particular aspect of American culture—norms of economic inequality and opportunity—there may be more than first meets the eye. Indeed, relatively little research exists on this subject, particularly in the era of rising inequality since the 1980s. Without such research, we naturally fall back on our social antennae, which are not likely to be reliable given the necessarily limited scope of our experiences and networks. Add to this that many commentators inhabit relatively elite positions in society (e.g., professors, journalists, pollsters, and politicians), and the result is often a chasm between elite and public understandings of the issue. This is not a chasm that characterizes only one side of the political aisle, however. In this chapter, I describe three political and policy responses to problems of inequality and opportunity and examine how they square with public opinion about the topic. Each approach is characterized by a particular mix of views concerning the two related issues of opportunity and inequality (of outcomes). • “Equalizing opportunity”: This approach not only places greater emphasis on equalizing opportunities than on equalizing outcomes, it pits one against the other and actively opposes equalizing outcomes as a policy objective. This approach tends to be more identified today with conservatives than with liberals, but it has had broad-based appeal over the long course of American history and is considered by many to be the dominant ideology of the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Do They Know and Do They Care? Americans' Awareness of Rising Inequality
    Do They Know and Do They Care? Americans’ Awareness of Rising Inequality* Paper to be presented at the Russell Sage Foundation Social Inequality Conference University of California, Berkeley May, 2005 Leslie McCall Departments of Sociology and Women’s and Gender Studies Rutgers University and Senior Fellow, Demos * This research was supported by a grant from the Russell Sage Foundation, a visiting fellowship from Demos: A Network of Ideas and Action, and a faculty fellowship from the Rutgers University Center for the Critical Analysis of Contemporary Culture (CCACC), for which I am very grateful. For helpful conversations, I thank David Callahan at Demos and Lane Kenworthy. For many comments and suggestions, I also thank participants in the Sociology Department Colloquium at the University of California, Berkeley, and especially Michael Hout, participants in the conference on Inequality and American Democracy at Princeton University, and seminar and colloquium participants at the CCACC, Northwestern University, the University of Michigan, the CUNY Graduate Center, Yale University, New York University, and the University of Pennsylvania. I also thank Julian Brash for excellent research assistance. ABSTRACT Inequality now stands at pre-World War II levels but it seems to have received little attention by politicians or the media. Does the lack of attention reflect a lack of knowledge or a lack of concern among the general public? Presumably in a democracy public policies are shaped by the public’s awareness and tolerance of social problems and yet we have little information about Americans’ awareness and tolerance of rising inequality. An analysis of survey data from 1987 to 2000 shows that despite the prevailing image that Americans are tolerant of inequality, well over half of the population thinks that inequality is too high, and more importantly, this share rose significantly over the period of rising inequality and then fell significantly during the late 1990s economic boom, suggesting that Americans were indeed aware of some trend.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CURRICULUM VITAE Leslie Mccall Department of Sociology 1810 Chicago Avenue Northwestern University Evanston, IL 60208-1330
    CURRICULUM VITAE Leslie McCall Department of Sociology 1810 Chicago Avenue Northwestern University Evanston, IL 60208-1330 [email protected] http://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/faculty-experts/fellows/mccall.html EDUCATION 1995 Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Sociology 1990 M.A., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Sociology 1986 B.A., Brown University, Departments of Computer Science and Economic Development Studies POSITIONS HELD 2013- Professor, Northwestern University 2012- Courtesy Appointment, Department of Political Science 2010-2015 Director of Undergraduate Studies, Department of Sociology 2006- Faculty Fellow, Institute for Policy Research 2006-2013 Associate Professor, Northwestern University, Department of Sociology 2001-2006 Associate Professor, Rutgers University 1995-2001 Assistant Professor, Rutgers University Department of Sociology (75%)/Women’s Studies Program (25%) AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Social Inequality and Demography: Gender, Class, and Race; Political Sociology; Economic Sociology; Social Theory; Methodology AWARDS, HONORS, AND MEMBERSHIPS 2016 MIEM Fellowship, School of Public Affairs, Sciences Po, Paris, France (April) 2015-2016 Distinguished Visiting Fellow, Advanced Research Collaborative, CUNY Graduate Center 2015-2016 Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University (declined) 2012-2013 Public Voices Fellowship, Northwestern University 2012 Visiting Scholar, Sciences Po, Paris, France (November) 2011- Elected Member, Sociological Research
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Leslie Mccall Department of Sociology the Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY) 365 Fifth Avenue
    CURRICULUM VITAE Leslie McCall Department of Sociology The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY) 365 Fifth Avenue, Room 6112.09 New York, New York 10016 [email protected] http://www.gc.cuny.edu/stonecenter/Leslie-McCall EDUCATION 1995 Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Sociology 1990 M.A., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Sociology 1986 B.A., Brown University, Departments of Computer Science and Economic Development Studies POSITIONS HELD 2017-present Presidential Professor, Departments of Sociology and Political Science Associate Director, Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality The Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY) 2013-2016 Professor, Northwestern University 2012-2016 Courtesy Appointment, Department of Political Science 2010-2015 Director of Undergraduate Studies, Department of Sociology 2006-2016 Faculty Fellow, Institute for Policy Research 2006-2013 Associate Professor, Northwestern University, Department of Sociology 2001-2006 Associate Professor, Rutgers University 1995-2001 Assistant Professor, Rutgers University Department of Sociology (75%)/Women’s Studies Program (25%) AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Social Inequality and Demography: Gender, Class, and Race; Political Sociology; Economic Sociology; Social Theory; Methodology AWARDS, HONORS, AND MEMBERSHIPS 2017-2020 Member, Social Inequality Advisory Committee, Russell Sage Foundation 2016- Associate Principal Investigator, TESS (Time-Sharing Experiments in the Social Sciences) 2016 MIEM Fellowship, School of
    [Show full text]