Integral Equations, Eigenvalue, Function Interpolation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integral Equations, Eigenvalue, Function Interpolation Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation Marcin Chrząszcz [email protected] Monte Carlo methods, 26 May, 2016 1 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 1/19 . Integral equations, introduction V Fredholm integral equation of the second order: ∫ b ϕ(x) = f(x) + K(x, y)ϕ(y)dy a V The f and K are known functions. K is called kernel. V The CHALLENGE: find the ϕ that obeys the above equations. V There are NO numerical that can solve this type of equations! V Different methods have to be used depending on the f and K func- tions. V The MC algorithm: construct a probabilistic algorithm which has an expected value the solution of the above equations. There are many ways to build this! V We assume that the Neumann series converges! 2 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 2/19 . Integral equations, approximations V The following steps approximate the Fredholm equation: ∫ b ϕ0(x) = 0, ϕ1(x) = f(x) + K(x, y)ϕ0(y)dy = f(x) a ∫ ∫ b b ϕ2(x) = f(x) + K(x, y)ϕ1(y)dy = f(x) + K(x, y)f(y)dy a a ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ ϕ (x) = f(x) + b K(x, y)dy = f(x) + b K(x, y)f(y)dy + b b K(x, y)K(y, z)f(z)dydz 3 a a a a V Now we put the following notations: ∫ b K(1)(x, y) = K(x, y) K(2)(x, y) = K(x, t)K(t, y)dt a V One gets: ∫ ∫ b b (1) (2) ϕ3(x) = f(x) + K (x, y)f(y)dy + K (x, y)f(y)dy a a 3 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 3/19 . Integral equations, approximations V Continuing this process: ∫ b − K(n)(x, y) = K(x, t)K(n 1)(t, y)dt a and the n-th approximation: ∫ ∫ b b (1) (2) ϕn(x) = f(x) + K (x, y)f(y)dy + K (x, y)f(y)dy+ a a∫ b ... + K(n)(x, y)f(y)dy a V Now going with the Neumann series: n → ∞: ∫ ∑n b (n) ϕ(x) = limn→∞ϕn(x) = f(x) + K (x, y)f(y)dy i=1 a V The above series converges only inside the square: a ¬ x, y ¬ b for: ∫ ∫ b b |K(x, y)|2dxdy < 1 a a 4 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 4/19 . Integral equations, algorithm V The random walk of particle happens on the interval (a, b): • In the t = 0 the particle is in the position x0 = x. • If the particle at time t = n − 1 is in the xn−1 position then in time t = n the position is: xn = xn−1 + ξn. The numbers ξ1, ξ2, ... are independent random numbers generated from ρ p.d.f.. • The particle stops the walk once it reaches the position a or b. • The particle life time is n when xn ¬ a and xn ­ b. • The expected life time is given by the equation: ∫ b τ(x) = ρ1(x) + [1 + τ(y)] ρ(y − x)dy a where: ∫ ∫ a−x ∞ ρq(x) = ρ(y)dy + ρ(y)dy −∞ b−x is the probability of particle annihilation in the time t = 1. 5 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 5/19 . Integral equations, algorithm 2 V The above can be transformed: ∫ b τ(x) = 1 + τ(y)ρ(x − y)dy (1) a V Now if p(x) is the probability that the particle in time t = 0 was in position x gets annihilated because it crosses the border a. V The probability obeys the analogous equation: ∫ b p(x) = ρ(x) + p(y)ρ(y − x)dy (2) a where ∫ a−x ρ(x) = ρ(y)dy −∞ is the probability of annihilating the particle in the first walk. V For the functions τ and ρ we got the integral Fredholm equation. V So the above random walk can be be used to solve the Equations 1 and 2. 6 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 6/19 . Integral equations, algorithm 3 V The ρ(x) is the p.d.f. of random variables ξn. V We observe the random walk of the particle. The trajectory: γ = (x0, x1, x2, ..., xn). This means for t = 0, 1, 2..., n − 1 and xn ¬ a or xn ­ b. Additionally we mark: γr = (x0, x1, ..., xr), r ¬ n. V We defined a random variable: ∑n S(x) = V (γr)f(xr−1) r=1 where V (γ0) = 1, K(xr−1, xr) V (γr) = V (γr−1) ρ(xr − xr−1) V One can prove that E [S(x)] treated as a function of x variable is the solution to the integral equation. 7 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 7/19 . Integral equations, algorithm 4 V We define a new random variable: { V (γn−r )f(xn−r ) , r ¬ n, ρ(xn−r ) cr(x) = 0, r > n where ρr(x) is defined as: ∫ ∫ a−x +∞ ρ1(x) = ρ(y)dy + ρ(y)dy, ∫−∞ ∫ b−x b b ρr(x) = ... ρ(x1 − x)ρ(x2 − x1)...ρ(xr−1 − xr−2)ρ1(xr−1)dx1...dxr−1 a a is the probability that the particle that is at given time in the x coordinate will survive r moments. V One can prove that E [cr(x)] treated as a function of x variable is the solution to the integral equation. 8 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 8/19 . Integral equations, general remark . There is a general trick: . Any integral equation can be transformed to linear equation using quadratic form. If .done so one can use the algorithms form lecture 8 to solve it. Bullet prove solution! 9 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 9/19 . Eigenvalue problem V The Eigenvalue problem is to find λ that obeys the equation: −→ −→ H x = λ x V For simplicity we assume there the biggest Eigenvalue is singular and it’s real. V The numerical method is basically an iterative procedure to find the biggest Eigen- value: • −→ We choose randomly a vector x 0. • The m vector we choose accordingly to formula: −→ −→ x m = H x m−1/λm where λm is choose such that ∑n −→ |( x m)j | = 1 j=1 −→ −→ the ( x )j is the j coordinate of the x vector, j = 1, 2, 3, ..., n V The set λm is converging to the largest Eigenvalue of the H matrix. 10 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 10/19 . Eigenvalue problem V From the above we get: ∑n −→ m−→ m−→ λ1λ2...λm( x j ) = (H x 0)j ; λ1λ2...λm = (H x 0)j j=1 V For big k and m > k one gets: ∑ n m−→ (H x 0)j − ∑j=1 = λ λ ...λ ≈ λm k n k−→ k+1 k+2 m j=1(H x 0)j from which: [∑ −→ ] 1 n m m−k (H x 0)j λ ≈ ∑j=1 n k−→ j=1(H x 0)j m−→ V This is the Eigenvalue estimation corresponding to H x 0 for sufficient large m. 11 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 11/19 . Eigenvalue problem, probabilistic model V Let Q = (qij ), i, j = 1, 2, ..., n is the probability matrix: ∑n qij ­ 0, qij = 1 j=1 V We construct a random walk on the set: {1, 2, ....n} accordingly to the below rules: • In the t = 0 the particle is in a randomly chosen state i0 accordingly to binned p.d.f.: pj . • If in the moment t = n − 1 the particle is in in−1 state then in the next moment it goes to the state in with the probability qin−1j . • For γ = (i0, i1, ...) trajectory we define a random variable: −→ ( x )i0 hi1i0 hi2i1 hi3i2 ...hir ir−1 Wr(γ) = pi0 qi1i0 qi2i1 qi3i2 ...qir ir−1 V Now we do: E [W (γ)] − m ≈ λm k E [Wk(γ)] V So to estimate the largest Eigenvalue: 12 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 12/19 . [ ] 1 W (γ) m−k λˆ = m Wk(γ) . Function interpolation V Lets put f(x1) = f1, f(x2) = f2, which we know the functions. V The problem: calculate the f(p) for x1 < p < x2. V From the interpolation method we get: p − x1 x2 − p f(p) = f2 + f1 x2 − x1 x2 − x1 V I am jet-lagged writing this so let me put: x1 = 0 and x2 = 1: f(p) = (1 − p)f1 + pf2 V For 2-dim: ∑ f(p1, p2) = r1r2f(δ1, δ2) δ where: { 1 − pi, δi = 0 ri = pi, δi = 1 V the sum is over all pairs (in this case 4). 13 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 13/19 . Function interpolation V For n-dim we get a monstrous: ∑ f(p1, p2, ..., pn) = r1r2...rnf(δ1, ..., δn) δ the sum is over all combinations (δ1, ..., δn), where δi = 0, 1. V The above sum is over 2n terms and each of it has (n + 1) temrs. It’s easy to imagine that for large n this is hard... Example n = 50 then we have 1014 ingredients. V There has to be a better way to do this! V From construction: ∑ 0 ¬ r1r2...rn ¬ 1, r1r2...rn = 1 δ V We can treat the ri as probabilities! We define a random varaible: ξ = (ξ1, ..., ξn) such that: P(ξi = 0) = 1 − pi, P(ξi = 1) = pi The extrapolation value is then equal: f(p1, p2, ..., pn) = E [f(ξ1, ..., ξn)] 14 /19 Marcin Chrząszcz (Universität Zürich) Integral equations, eigenvalue, function interpolation 14/19 .
Recommended publications
  • Some Schemata for Applications of the Integral Transforms of Mathematical Physics
    mathematics Review Some Schemata for Applications of the Integral Transforms of Mathematical Physics Yuri Luchko Department of Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry, Beuth University of Applied Sciences Berlin, Luxemburger Str. 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] Received: 18 January 2019; Accepted: 5 March 2019; Published: 12 March 2019 Abstract: In this survey article, some schemata for applications of the integral transforms of mathematical physics are presented. First, integral transforms of mathematical physics are defined by using the notions of the inverse transforms and generating operators. The convolutions and generating operators of the integral transforms of mathematical physics are closely connected with the integral, differential, and integro-differential equations that can be solved by means of the corresponding integral transforms. Another important technique for applications of the integral transforms is the Mikusinski-type operational calculi that are also discussed in the article. The general schemata for applications of the integral transforms of mathematical physics are illustrated on an example of the Laplace integral transform. Finally, the Mellin integral transform and its basic properties and applications are briefly discussed. Keywords: integral transforms; Laplace integral transform; transmutation operator; generating operator; integral equations; differential equations; operational calculus of Mikusinski type; Mellin integral transform MSC: 45-02; 33C60; 44A10; 44A15; 44A20; 44A45; 45A05; 45E10; 45J05 1. Introduction In this survey article, we discuss some schemata for applications of the integral transforms of mathematical physics to differential, integral, and integro-differential equations, and in the theory of special functions. The literature devoted to this subject is huge and includes many books and reams of papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Integral Equation for the Number of Integer Points in a Circle
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS { N. 41{2019 (522{525) 522 INTEGRAL EQUATION FOR THE NUMBER OF INTEGER POINTS IN A CIRCLE Magomed A. Chakhkiev Gagik S. Sulyan Manya A. Ziroyan Department of Applied Mathematics Social State University of Russia Wilhelm Pieck St. 4, Moscow Russian Federation Nikolay P. Tretyakov Department of Applied Mathematics Social State University of Russia Wilhelm Pieck St. 4, Moscow Russian Federation and School of Public Policy The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Prospect Vernadskogo, 84, Moscow 119571 Russian Federation Saif A. Mouhammad∗ Department of Physics Faculty of Science Taif University Taif, AL-Haweiah Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [email protected] Abstract. The problem is to obtain the most accurate upper estimate for the absolute value of the difference between the number of integer points in a circle and its area (when the radius tends to infinity). In this paper we obtain an integral equation for the function expressing the dependence of the number of integer points in a circle on its radius. The kernel of the equation contains the Bessel functions of the first kind, and the equation itself is a kind of the Hankel transform. Keywords: Gauss circle problem, integral equation, Hankel transform. 1. The problem and calculations The Gauss circle problem is the problem of determining how many integer lattice points there are in a circle centered at the origin andp with given radius. Let us consider the circle K(R): x2 + y2 ≤ R and let A( R) be the number of ∗. Corresponding author INTEGRAL EQUATION FOR THE NUMBER OF INTEGER POINTS IN A CIRCLE 523 p points with integer coordinates within this circle.
    [Show full text]
  • Laplace Transforms: Theory, Problems, and Solutions
    Laplace Transforms: Theory, Problems, and Solutions Marcel B. Finan Arkansas Tech University c All Rights Reserved 1 Contents 43 The Laplace Transform: Basic Definitions and Results 3 44 Further Studies of Laplace Transform 15 45 The Laplace Transform and the Method of Partial Fractions 28 46 Laplace Transforms of Periodic Functions 35 47 Convolution Integrals 45 48 The Dirac Delta Function and Impulse Response 53 49 Solving Systems of Differential Equations Using Laplace Trans- form 61 50 Solutions to Problems 68 2 43 The Laplace Transform: Basic Definitions and Results Laplace transform is yet another operational tool for solving constant coeffi- cients linear differential equations. The process of solution consists of three main steps: • The given \hard" problem is transformed into a \simple" equation. • This simple equation is solved by purely algebraic manipulations. • The solution of the simple equation is transformed back to obtain the so- lution of the given problem. In this way the Laplace transformation reduces the problem of solving a dif- ferential equation to an algebraic problem. The third step is made easier by tables, whose role is similar to that of integral tables in integration. The above procedure can be summarized by Figure 43.1 Figure 43.1 In this section we introduce the concept of Laplace transform and discuss some of its properties. The Laplace transform is defined in the following way. Let f(t) be defined for t ≥ 0: Then the Laplace transform of f; which is denoted by L[f(t)] or by F (s), is defined by the following equation Z T Z 1 L[f(t)] = F (s) = lim f(t)e−stdt = f(t)e−stdt T !1 0 0 The integral which defined a Laplace transform is an improper integral.
    [Show full text]
  • Solution to Volterra Singular Integral Equations and Non Homogenous Time Fractional Pdes
    Gen. Math. Notes, Vol. 14, No. 1, January 2013, pp. 6-20 ISSN 2219-7184; Copyright © ICSRS Publication, 2013 www.i-csrs.org Available free online at http://www.geman.in Solution to Volterra Singular Integral Equations and Non Homogenous Time Fractional PDEs A. Aghili 1 and H. Zeinali 2 1,2 Department of Applied Mathematics Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, University of Guilan, P.O. Box- 1841, Rasht – Iran 1E-mail: [email protected] 2E-mail: [email protected] (Received: 8-10-12 / Accepted: 19-11-12) Abstract In this work, the authors implemented Laplace transform method for solving certain partial fractional differential equations and Volterra singular integral equations. Constructive examples are also provided to illustrate the ideas. The result reveals that the transform method is very convenient and effective. Keywords : Non-homogeneous time fractional heat equations; Laplace transform; Volterra singular integral equations. 1 Introduction In this work, the authors used Laplace transform for solving Volterra singular integral equations and PFDEs. Solution to Volterra Singular Integral… 7 The Laplace transform is an alternative method for solving different types of PDEs. Also it is commonly used to solve electrical circuit and systems problems. In this work, the authors implemented transform method for solving the partial fractional heat equation which arise in applications. Several methods have been introduced to solve fractional differential equations, the popular Laplace transform method, [ 1 ] , [ 2 ] , [ 3 ], [ 4 ] , and operational method [ 10]. However, most of these methods are suitable for special types of fractional differential equations, mainly the linear with constant coefficients. More detailed information about some of these results can be found in a survey paper by Kilbas and Trujillo [10].
    [Show full text]
  • Math 551 Lecture Notes Fredholm Integral Equations (A Brief Introduction)
    MATH 551 LECTURE NOTES FREDHOLM INTEGRAL EQUATIONS (A BRIEF INTRODUCTION) Topics covered • Fredholm integral operators ◦ Integral equations (Volterra vs. Fredholm) ◦ Eigenfunctions for separable kernels ◦ Adjoint operator, symmetric kernels • Solution procedure (separable) ◦ Solution via eigenfunctions (first and second kind) ◦ Shortcuts: undetermined coefficients ◦ An example (separable kernel, n = 2) • Non-separable kernels (briefly) ◦ Hilbert-Schmidt theory Preface Read the Fredholm alternative notes before proceeding. This is covered in the book (Section 9.4), but the material on integral equations is not. For references on integral equa- tions (and other topics covered in the book too!), see: • Riley and Hobson, Mathematical methods for physics and engineering (this is an extensive reference, also for other topics in the course) • Guenther and Lee, Partial differential equations of mathematical physics and integral equations (more technical; not the best first reference) • J.D. Logan, Applied mathematics (more generally about applied mathematics tech- niques, with a good section on integral equations) 1. Fredholm integral equations: introduction Differential equations Lu = f are a subset of more general equations involving linear op- erators L. Here, we give a brief treatment of a generalization to integral equations. To motivate this, every ODE IVP can be written as an `integral equation' by integrating. For instance, consider the first order IVP du = f(x; u(x)); u(a) = u : (1.1) dx 0 Integrate both sides from a to x to get the integral equation Z x u(x) = u0 + f(s; u(s)) ds: (1.2) a If u solves (1.2) then it also solves (1.1); they are `equivalent' in this sense.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Introduction to the Integral Equation(IE) and Construction Of
    Chapter 1 Introduction to the Integral Equation(IE) and Construction of the IE. 1.1. Introduction: Integral Equation began to appear since the mid-seventeenth century , when some scientists were not able to solve the differential equation . The integral equation developed with appear Abel kernel after that Volterra integral equation lastly Fredholm integral equation. In this time we find numerical method played a great role to solve integral equation. Therefore of great progressing in basic science whether physical or engineering has played essential role. Topics on integral equations has grown and evolved to its direct association lists the large branches of mathematics, such as account differential and integrative and questions of boundary conditions. During the twenty-five last year, there is a marked increase in the use of integral equations and formulations for finding scientific solutions to engineering problems and solving differential equations that are difficult to solve by normal methods. In the recent period found that the integral equations give a better solution than give differential equations. The explosive growth in industry and technology requires constructive adjustments in mathematics text researches. The integral equation it equation that appear in the unknown function under signal or more, from the signals of integrity. There more types of integral equation from it linear and nonlinear integral equation. The general formula linear integral equation it is: ١ () = () + (, )() (1 − 1) Where () unknown function, () known function and (, )known function are called kernel integral equation. We say that integral equation it is linear if that which operations on unknown function in equation it linear operations. And the general formula nonlinear integral equation it is : () = () + (, )(()) (1 − 2) Where unknown function it is nonlinear .
    [Show full text]
  • The Solution of Convolution-Typed Volterra Integral Equation by G-Transform
    International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7 (4) (2018) 6665-6669 International Journal of Engineering & Technology Website: www.sciencepubco.com/index.php/IJET doi: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.26348 Research paper The solution of convolution-typed Volterra integral equation by G-transform Hwajoon Kim1* and Kamsing Nonlaopon2 1Kyungdong University 2Khon Kaen University *Corresponding author E-mail:[email protected] Abstract We would like to consider the solution of convolution-typed Volterra integral equation by using G-transform, a generalized Laplace-typed transform. The tool of G-transform is analyzed to be well applied to convolution-typed Volterra integral equation. Keywords: initial value problem; G-transform; Volterra integral equation 1. Introduction It is a well-known fact that Volterra integral equation is equivalent to the initial value problem of ordinary differential equation(ODE). Since the tool used to find the solutions in this article is G-transform, a generalized Laplace-typed transform, we would like to check it up first. In a word, G-transform is a comprehensive form of Laplace-typed transform, and this transform has a strong point in the choice of an integer a. This means that we can freely choose a for a variety of problems. The form of Laplace-typed transform is Z ¥ k(s;t) f (t)dt; 0 and Laplace transform has the kernel k(s;t) = e−st as we know already[8]. This Laplace transform can be rewritten as Z ¥ − t e u f (t)dt 0 by s = 1=u, and so we proposed the general form of Laplace-typed transform by Z ¥ a − t u e u f (t)dt 0 as a natural extension[4].
    [Show full text]
  • A Technique for Solving the Singular Integral Equations of Potential Theory
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Mathematics & Statistics Theses & Dissertations Mathematics & Statistics Spring 2007 A Technique for Solving the Singular Integral Equations of Potential Theory Brian George Burns Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/mathstat_etds Part of the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Burns, Brian G.. "A Technique for Solving the Singular Integral Equations of Potential Theory" (2007). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Dissertation, Mathematics & Statistics, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/q9kv-0x34 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/mathstat_etds/6 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Mathematics & Statistics at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mathematics & Statistics Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A TECHNIQUE FOR SOLVING THE SINGULAR INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF POTENTIAL THEORY by Brian George Burns M.Sci. 1998, University of Glasgow M.Sc. 1999, University of Stirling M.S. 2005, Old Dominion University A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY May 2007 John Tweed (Director) Ion Melrose John/A. Adam Richard D. Noren Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ABSTRACT A TECHNIQUE FOR SOLVING THE SINGULAR INTEGRAL EQUATIONS OF POTENTIAL THEORY Brian George Burns Old Dominion University, 2007 Director: Dr. John Tweed The singular integral equations of Potential Theory are investigated using ideas from both classical and contemporary mathematics. The goal of this semi-analytic ap­ proach is to produce numerical schemes that are both general and computationally simple.
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Solutions of Fredholm Integral Equation of Second Kind Using Piecewise Bernoulli Polynomials
    Numerical Solutions of Fredholm Integral Equation of Second Kind Using Piecewise Bernoulli Polynomials Afroza Shirin1, Md. Shafiqul Islam*2 1Institute of Natural Sciences, United International University, Dhaka-1209, Bangladesh. Email: [email protected]. 2Department of Mathematics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka – 1000, Bangladesh *Corresponding author, Email: [email protected] Abstract: The aim of this paper is to solve the integral equations numerically using piecewise Bernoulli polynomials. The Bernoulli polynomials are derived explicitly over the unit interval. A matrix formulation for a non-singular linear Fredholm integral equation of the second kind is derived by the technique of Galerkin method. In the Galerkin method, the Bernoulli polynomials are exploited as the linear combination in the approximation as basis functions. Numerical examples are considered to verify the effectiveness of the proposed derivations. Keywords: Fredholm integral equation, Galerkin method, Bernoulli polynomials, Numerical solutions. I. Introduction In the survey of solutions of integral equations, a large number of analytical but a few approximate methods are available for solving numerically various classes of integral equations [1, 2, 7, 8 ]. Since the piecewise polynomials are differentiable and integrable, the Bernstein polynomials [5 – 8] have been used for solving differential and integral equations numerically. Recently, integral equations have been solved by the well known variational iteration method [9]. In the literature [7], Mandal and Bhattacharya have attempted to solve integral equations numerically using Bernstein polynomials, but they obtained the results in terms of finite series solutions In contrast to this, we solve the linear Fredholm integral equation of the second kind by exploiting very well known Galerkin method, and Bernoulli polynomials [4] are used as trial functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Integral Equation
    :Integral Equation: 1. Definition Integral Equation: An integral equation is an equation is which an unknown function appears under one or more integral sign. 2. Linear and Non-Linear Integral equation: An integral equation is called linear if only linear operation are performed in it upon the unknown function. An integral equation which is not linear is known as a non-linear integral equation. Most general type of integral equation is of the form ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) . In this case upper limit may be variable or constant. And = + ∫ , lower limit is always constant. 3. If upper limit is constant then integral equation is known as Fredholm integral equation. If upper limit is variable ( ) then integral equation is known as Volterra integral equation. 4. In above expression if () ≠ then integral equation is third kind. And if () = 0 then integral equation is first kind. Again when () = 1 then integral equation is second kind. If () = 0 then integral equation is homogeneous. 5. Singular Integral equation: When one or both limits of integration become infinite or when the kernel become infinite at one or more points within the range of integration, the integral equation is known as singular integral equation. 6. Symmetric kernel: A kernel (, ) is symmetric (hermitian) if (, ) = (, ) in case of real values = . 7. Seprable of Degenerate kernel: (, ) = ∑ () ℎ() note that () can be regarded as linearly independent. 8. Integral equation of the Convolution type: Kernel must be of type (, ) = ( − ) 9. Iterated Kernels: Iterated kernels (, ), = 1,2,3, … are defined as: (, ) = (, ) and ( ) ( ) ( ) , = ∫ , , = 2,3, …. 10. Resolvent Kernel or Reciprocal Kernel: It written in place of (, ) to find solution in form (, ; ) Γ(x, t; λ) 11.
    [Show full text]
  • SOLUTION of INTEGRAL EQUATIONS and LAPLACE - STIELTJES TRANSFORM Deshna Loonker
    Palestine Journal of Mathematics Vol. 5(1) (2016) , 43–49 © Palestine Polytechnic University-PPU 2016 SOLUTION OF INTEGRAL EQUATIONS AND LAPLACE - STIELTJES TRANSFORM Deshna Loonker Communicated by P. K. Banerji MSC 2010 Classifications: Primary 44A35; Secondary 44A99, 45D05, 45E10, 46F10, 46F12 Keywords : Laplace - Stieltjes transform, Laplace transform, distribution spaces, Volterra integral equation, Fredlom integral equation of convolution type, convolution. This work is partially supported by the UGC Post Doctoral Fellowship for Women, India, No. F.15-134/12 (SA-II), sanctioned to the author. Abstract We have obtained solutions of integral equations such as Volterra convolution type of first and second type and Abel integral equation using Laplace - Stieltjes transform and ap- plications are mentioned through examples. The convolution property for Laplace - Stieltjes transform is obtained. The solution obtained is considered in distributional sense. 1 Introduction Integral transforms, viz. Fourier, Laplace, Hankel, Sumudu, Elzaki, Aboodh, and the wavelet transform among other, have been used [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8] to obtain solutions of various types of differential and integral equations. The Laplace transform can be studied and researched from years ago [1, 9] In this paper, Laplace - Stieltjes transform is employed in evaluating solutions of certain integral equations that is aided by the convolution. It is remarked that the solution of integral equations obtained by using Laplace - Stieltjes transform, can also be defined on distribution spaces. Let F (t) is a well defined function of t, for t ≥ 0 and s be a complex number. The Stieltjes integral is 1 Z ∗ −st (LsF )(s) = F (s) = e dF (t); (1.1) 0 which converges on some s0; the Stieltjes integral (1.1) converges on s such that Re(s) > Re(s0).
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Method to Solve Volterra Integral Equation of the First Kind
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 220 (2008) 51–57 www.elsevier.com/locate/cam Direct method to solve Volterra integral equation of the first kind using operational matrix with block-pulse functions E. Baboliana,∗, Z. Masourib aDepartment of Mathematics, Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran bDepartment of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Campus, Tehran, Iran Received 26 April 2007; received in revised form 16 July 2007 Abstract This article proposes a simple efficient direct method for solving Volterra integral equation of the first kind. By using block-pulse functions and their operational matrix of integration, first kind integral equation can be reduced to a linear lower triangular system which can be directly solved by forward substitution. Some examples are presented to illustrate efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. MSC: 65R20; 45A05; 45D05; 41A30 Keywords: Volterra integral equation of the first kind; Direct method; Vector forms; Block-pulse functions; Operational matrix 1. Introduction The integral equation method is widely used for solving many problems in mathematical physics and engineering. These problems are often reduced to integral equations of the first kind. This article proposes a novel direct method to solve these equations. Integral equations of the first kind are inherently ill-posed problems, meaning that the solution is generally unstable, and small changes to the problem can make very large changes to the answers obtained [2,4,5]. This ill-posedness makes numerical solutions very difficult, a small error may lead to an unbounded error.
    [Show full text]