African American Resource Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Guide to Austin Housing
GUIDE TO AUSTIN HOUSING This list is provided as a courtesy to scholars. Inclusion on the list does not constitute an endorsement by the Ransom Center, nor does it provide a guarantee of the quality of a given establishment’s services. Information is thought to be accurate as of the date of compilation; the Ransom Center cannot be responsible for errors or omissions. It is the visitor’s responsibility to contact establishments to confirm current rates and other details according to his or her own needs. The Ransom Center is unable to provide assistance with reservations or arrangements. This list is organized by establishment type (private residences, bed and breakfasts, hotels, etc.). Establishments within each section of this list appear in the order of their distance from the Ransom Center, from nearest to farthest. The heading of each entry provides the establishment’s location, which may be used to determine transportation options. Please be aware that not all establishments are located on a direct bus route to campus, and some routes may have recently changed due to a 2018 update to Austin’s public transportation system. Please see the “Public Transportation” section below for further information about researching public transportation options between a particular location and the Ransom Center. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION For complete and current information about public transportation in Austin, visit www.capmetro.org. The “Plan Your Trip” section of this website offers point-to-point directions using the public transportation system. The Ransom Center is located at 300 West 21st Street, Austin, Texas, 78712. PRIVATE RESIDENCES: LESS THAN 1.5 MILES FROM THE RANSOM CENTER 209 West 33rd Street Newly renovated 1 bed, 1 bath, 550 sq. -
Geophysical Mapping of Mount Bonnell Fault of Balcones Fault Zone
Geophysical mapping of Mount Bonnell fault of Balcones fault zone and its implications on Trinity-Edwards Aquifer interconnection, central Texas, USA Mustafa Saribudak1 Abstract There are up to 1200 ft (365 m) of total displacement across the Geophysical surveys (resistivity, natural potential [self-po- BFZ. Faults generally dip steeply (45–85°), varying primarily tential], conductivity, magnetic, and ground penetrating radar) due to specific rock properties and local stress fields (Ferrill and were conducted at three locations across the Mount Bonnell fault Morris, 2008). in the Balcones fault zone of central Texas. The normal fault has The BFZ includes the Edwards and Trinity aquifers, which hundreds of meters of throw and is the primary boundary between are primary sources of water for south-central Texas communities, two major aquifers in Texas, the Trinity and Edwards aquifers. including the city of San Antonio. The Trinity Aquifer underlies In the near surface, the fault juxtaposes the Upper Glen Rose the Edwards Aquifer through the Balcones fault zone. Formation on the Edwards Plateau, consisting of interbedded The BFZ’s most prominent fault is the Mount Bonnell, with limestone and marly limestone, against the Edwards Group, which a vertical throw of up to 600 ft (183 m) (Figure 1). The fault is mostly limestone, on the eastern down-thrown side (coastal hydrogeologically juxtaposes these Cretaceous carbonate aquifers plain). The Upper Glen Rose member is considered to be the during the Miocene tectonic deformation associated with the Upper Trinity Aquifer and also a confining zone underlying the Balcones fault zone, where the younger Edwards Group limestone Edwards Aquifer. -
Girl Scouts of Central Texas Explore Austin Patch Program
Girl Scouts of Central Texas Explore Austin Patch Program Created by the Cadette and Senior Girl Scout attendees of Zilker Day Camp 2003, Session 4. This patch program is a great program to be completed in conjunction with the new Capital Metro Patch Program available at gsctx.org/badges. PATCHES ARE AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE IN GSCTX SHOPS. Program Grade Level Requirements: • Daisy - Ambassador: explore a minimum of eight (8) places. Email [email protected] if you find any hidden gems that should be on this list and share your adventures here: gsctx.org/share EXPLORE 1. Austin Nature and Science Center, 2389 Stratford Dr., (512) 974-3888 2. *The Contemporary Austin – Laguna Gloria, 700 Congress Ave. (512) 453-5312 3. Austin City Limits – KLRU at 26th and Guadalupe 4. *Barton Springs Pool (512) 867-3080 5. BATS – Under Congress Street Bridge, at dusk from March through October. 6. *Bob Bullock Texas State History Museum, 1800 Congress Ave. (512) 936-8746 7. Texas State Cemetery, 909 Navasota St. (512) 463-0605 8. *Deep Eddy Pool, 401 Deep Eddy. (512) 472-8546 9. Dinosaur Tracks at Zilker Botanical Gardens, 2220 Barton Springs Dr. (512) 477-8672 10. Elisabet Ney Museum, 304 E. 44th St. (512) 974-1625 11. *French Legation Museum, 802 San Marcos St. (512) 472-8180 12. Governor’s Mansion, 1010 Colorado St. (512) 463-5518 13. *Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center, 4801 La Crosse Ave. (512) 232-0100 14. LBJ Library 15. UT Campus 16. Mayfield Park, 3505 W. 35th St. (512) 974-6797 17. Moonlight Tower, W. 9th St. -
1996-2015 Texas Book Festival Library Award Winners
1996-2015 Texas Book Festival Library Award Winners Abernathy Arlington Public Library, East Riverside Drive Branch Abernathy Public Library - 2000 Arlington Branch - 1996, 1997, Austin Public Library - 2004, 2007 Abilene 2001, 2008, 2014, 2015 Daniel H. Ruiz Branch Abilene Public Library – 1998, Arlington Public Library - 1997 Austin Public Library - 2001, 2006, 2009 Northeast Branch 2011 Abliene Public Library, South Arlington Public Library Southeast SE Austin Community Branch Branch - 1999 Branch Library - 2015 Austin Public Library - 2004 Alamo Arlington Public Library, Spicewood Springs Branch Lalo Arcaute Public Library - 2001 Woodland West Branch-2013 Albany George W. Hawkes Central Austin Public Library- 2009 Shackelford Co. Library - 1999, Library, Southwest Branch - St. John Branch Library 2004 2000, 2005, 2008, 2009 Austin Public Library - 1998, 2007 Alice Aspermont Terrazas Branch Alice Public Library - 2003 Stonewall Co. Public Library - Austin Public Library - 2007 Allen 1997 University Hills Branch Library Allen Public Library - 1996, 1997 Athens Austin Public Library - 2005 Alpine Henderson Co. Clint W. Murchison Windsor Park Branch Alpine Public Library – 1998, Memorial Library - 2000 Austin Public Library - 1999 2008, 2014 Aubrey Woodland West Branch Alpine Public Library South Aubrey Area Library - 1999 Cepeda Public Library - 2000, Branch - 2015 Austin 2006 Alto Austin Public Library - 1996, 2004 Lake Travis High - 1997 Stella Hill Memorial Library - Austin Public Library - 2004, 2007 School/Community Library 1998, -
No. 21-0170 in the SUPREME COURT of TEXAS RESPONSE BY
FILED 21-0170 3/2/2021 10:56 AM tex-51063305 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK No. 21-0170 _______________________________________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS _______________________________________ IN RE LINDA DURNIN, ERIC KROHN, AND MICHAEL LOVINS, Relators. _______________________________________ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ______________________________________ RESPONSE BY CITY OF AUSTIN AND AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL IN OPPOSITION TO FIRST AMENDED ORIGINAL EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS _______________________________________ Anne L. Morgan, City Attorney Renea Hicks State Bar No. 14432400 LAW OFFICE OF Meghan L. Riley, Chief-Litigation RENEA HICKS State Bar No. 24049373 State Bar No. 09580400 CITY OF AUSTIN–LAW DEP’T. P.O. Box 303187 P.O. Box 1546 Austin, Texas 78703-0504 Austin, Texas 78767-1546 (512) 480-8231 (512) 974-2268 [email protected] ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENTS CITY OF AUSTIN AND AUSTIN CITY COUNCIL IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL Party’s name Party’s status Attorneys for parties LINDA DURNIN Relators Donna García Davidson ERIC KROHN Capitol Station, P.O. Box 12131 MICHAEL LOVINS Austin, Texas 78711 Bill Aleshire ALESHIRELAW, P.C. 3605 Shady Valley Dr. Austin, Texas 78739 CITY OF AUSTIN Respondents Renea Hicks AUSTIN CITY LAW OFFICE OF RENEA HICKS COUNCIL P.O. Box 303187 Austin, Texas 78703-0504 Anne L. Morgan, City Attorney Meghan L. Riley, Chief – Litiga- tion CITY OF AUSTIN–LAW DEP’T. P. O. Box 1546 Austin, Texas 78767-1546 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Identity of Parties and Counsel ........................................................ -
South Congress Prostitution Problem Is Said to Be About 150 Years Old
99-03 So. Congress Prostitution Problem April 1999 ABSTRACT C>outh Austin's century and half year old history of prostitution which was on the Grand Avenue leading to the Capitol of the State of Texas, was responsible for disrupting the lives of business people and the citizens who live there. In 1992 citizens began meeting with the police to express their concerns over the growing problem of prostitution, especially the presence of a hill top pornographic theater across from a junior high school. Using police stings, they often netted over a hundred "Johns" along with an elected state official. It 1995 a new way of addressing the problem was formally put into action. A.P.D. Crime Net South officers began to address the issues of prostitution by using the SARA model. Now a former feed store and hot bed for prostitution, has become a Mexican Restaurant where President Bill Clinton ate. SCANNING: The Crime Net unit looked at the long history of prostitution, they surveyed police reports, talked to fellow officers and with citizens. They found that a high number of police calls for service were taking place at several motels along South Congress. They used surveillance, undercover buys, stepped up patrols and the abatement law to gather additional information ANALYSIS: In assessing the problem they found that the motels in question seemed to encourage and support the presences of the prostitute by allowing them on the property along with drug dealers. Sometimes the motel employees were the drug dealers. RESPONSE: They meet with the owners and neighborhood associations to talk about the problems. -
Austin Police Department Patrol Utilization Study
AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT PATROL UTILIZATION STUDY FINAL REPORT July 2012 1120 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 930 Washington, DC 20036 Executive Summary Sworn Staffing for the Austin Police Department The Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) was retained by the City of Austin to provide the Austin City Council and City Executives with recommendations for an innovative, sustainable method to determine current and future police department staffing needs. The objectives of the study include: reviewing the current demand for sworn law enforcement, including calls for service, investigative workload, staffing for special events, and utilization of support staff; examining benchmarks for police staffing that are used in a sample of U.S. cities with populations from 500,000 to one million; gathering information on local community expectations regarding perceptions of safety, crime reduction strategies, community policing, and patrol utilization; recommending a methodology for the calculation of police staffing needs that can be updated and replicated by city staff in the future; and providing recommendations regarding three- to five-year staffing projections based on the community-based goals. Assessing Police Staffing Officers per Thousand Population One measure that has been used for some time to assess officer staffing levels in Austin has been a ratio of officers per thousand residents. For a number of years the City has used “two per thousand” as its benchmark for minimum police staffing. The city’s population in April 2012 was listed as 824,205 which would dictate that the sworn staffing of the Austin Police Department (APD) be authorized at a minimum of 1,648. Although the two-per-thousand ratio is convenient and provides dependable increases in police staffing as the city’s population rises, it does not appear to be based on an objective assessment of policing needs in Austin. -
Spring 2021 H Volume 25 No
Spring 2021 H Volume 25 No. 1 2021 Virtual Homes Tour Premieres June 17! reservation Austin’s 2021 Virtual Ticket buyers will experience the living Homes Tour, “Rogers-Washington- history of one of East Austin’s most Holy Cross: Black Heritage, Living intact historic neighborhoods through History,” will premiere on Thursday, interviews with longtime residents and Virtual Homes Tour June 17 at 7:00 pm CST. This year’s homeowners, historic documentation, Thursday, June 17, 2021 virtual tour will feature the incredible and rich videography. Viewers will 7PM premiere, followed by Q&A postwar homes and histories of East also hear from architectural historian Austin’s Rogers-Washington-Holy Dr. Tara Dudley on the works of $20/PA members $25/Non-members Cross Historic District, Austin’s first architect John S. Chase, FAIA, whose historic district celebrating Black early career was forged through heritage. The 45-minute video will be personal connection to Rogers- Tickets on sale at followed by a live Q&A session via Washington-Holy Cross and whose preservationaustin.org Zoom. work has left an indelible mark on the historic district. Continued on page 3 PA Welcomes Meghan King 2020-2021 Board of Directors W e’re delighted to welcome Meghan King, our new Programs and Outreach Planner! H EXECUTIVE COMMITEE H Meghan came on board in Decem- Clayton Bullock, President Melissa Barry, VP ber 2020 as Preservation Austin’s Allen Wise, President-Elect Linda Y. Jackson, VP third full-time staff member. Clay Cary, Treasurer Christina Randle, Secretary Hailing from Canada, Meghan Lori Martin, Immediate Past President attributes her lifelong love for H DIRECTORS H American architectural heritage Katie Carmichael Harmony Grogan Kelley McClure to her childhood summers spent travelling the United States visiting Miriam Conner Patrick Johnson Alyson McGee Frank Lloyd Wright sites with her father. -
Downtown Austin Emerging Projects
Downtown Austin Emerging Projects Projects under construction or being planned in the lower part of Downtown Austin 1. 7th & Lamar (North Block, Phase II) (C2g) 11. Thomas C. Green Water Treatment Plant 20. 7Rio (R60) 28. 5th and Brazos (C54) 39. Eleven (R86) 8QGHU&RQVWUXFWLRQ (C56) 8QGHU&RQVWUXFWLRQ Planned 8QGHU&RQVWUXFWLRQ &RQVWUXFWLRQLVXQGHUZD\DWWKHVLWHRIWKHIRUPHU.$6(.9(7UDGLR Planned &RQVWUXFWLRQVWDUWHGLQ0D\ $QH[LVWLQJYDOHWSDUNLQJJDUDJHZLOOEHWRUQGRZQDQGUHSODFHGE\DQ :RUNFRQWLQXHVRQWKLVXQLWPXOWLIDPLO\SURMHFWRQ(WK6WUHHW VWXGLREXLOGLQJIRUWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQRIDQHZSDUNLQJJDUDJHZLWK 7KH*UHHQVLWHZLOOFRQVLVWRIVHYHUDOEXLOGLQJVXSWRVWRULHVWDOO RQWKLVXQLWDSDUWPHQW HLJKWVWRU\SDUNLQJJDUDJHZLWKVSDFHV7KDWJDUDJHVWUXFWXUHZLOODOVR RYHUORRNLQJ,DQGGRZQWRZQ$XVWLQ VIRIJURXQGÀRRUUHWDLO ,QFOXGLQJ%ORFN VHHEHORZ WKHSURMHFWZLOOKDYHPLOOLRQ WRZHUDW:WK6WUHHWDQG5LR LQFOXGHVTXDUHIHHWRIVWUHHWOHYHOUHWDLOVSDFH VTXDUHIHHWRIGHYHORSPHQWLQFOXGLQJDSDUWPHQWVVTIWRI *UDQGHE\&DOLIRUQLDEDVHG RI¿FHVSDFHDURRPKRWHODQGVTIWRIUHWDLO PRVWDORQJDQ GHYHORSPHQWFRPSDQ\&:6 40. Corazon (R66) H[WHQVLRQRIWKHQG6WUHHW'LVWULFW 7KHSURMHFWZDVGHVLJQHG 29. 5th & Brazos Mixed-Use Tower (C89) 8QGHU&RQVWUXFWLRQ E\ORFDODUFKLWHFWXUDO¿UP Planned 5KRGH3DUWQHUV &\SUHVV5HDO(VWDWH$GYLVHUVLVEXLOGLQJ&RUD]RQDYHUWLFDOPL[HGXVH $VN\VFUDSHURIXSWRVWRULHVZLWKKRWHOURRPVDQGUHVLGHQFHVDW(DVW SURMHFWWKDWZLOOLQFOXGHUHVLGHQWLDOXQLWVUHWDLODQGDUHVWDXUDQW )LIWKDQG%UD]RVVWUHHWVGRZQWRZQ7KHWRZHUFRXOGLQFOXGHRQHRUWZR KRWHOVDQGPRUHWKDQKRXVLQJXQLWVPRVWOLNHO\DSDUWPHQWV&KLFDJR EDVHG0DJHOODQ'HYHORSPHQW*URXSZRXOGGHYHORSWKHSURMHFWZLWK :DQ[LDQJ$PHULFD5HDO(VWDWH*URXSDOVREDVHGLQWKH&KLFDJRDUHD -
Charles Ingersoll: the ^Aristocrat As Copperhead
Charles Ingersoll: The ^Aristocrat as Copperhead HE INGERSOLL FAMILY is one of America's oldest. The first Ingersoll came to America in 1629, just nine years after the T^Mayflower. The first Philadelphia Ingersoll was Jared Inger- soll, who came to the city in 1771 as presiding judge of the King's vice-admiralty court. Previously, he had been the King's colonial agent and stamp master in Connecticut. During the Revolution, Jared remained loyal to the Crown. He stayed in Philadelphia for the first two years of the war, but in 1777, when he and other Tories were forced to leave, he returned to Connecticut, where he lived quietly until his death in 1781.1 Jared's son, Jared, Jr., was the first prominent Philadelphia Inger- soll. He came to Philadelphia with his father in 1771, studied law, and was admitted to the bar in 1778. Unlike his father, Jared, Jr., wholeheartedly supported the Revolution. Subsequently, he was a member of the Constitutional Convention in 1787, a member of the city council, city solicitor, attorney general of Pennsylvania, and United States District Attorney. Politically, he was an ardent Fed- eralist, but politics and affairs of state were never his prime interest; his real interest was the law, and most of his time and energy was devoted to his legal practice.2 Jared, Jr.'s, son, Charles Jared Ingersoll, was probably the most interesting of the Philadelphia Ingersolls. Like his father, grand- father, and most of the succeeding generations of Ingersolls, Charles Jared was a lawyer. He began a practice in Philadelphia in 1802, but devoted much of his time to politics. -
History of Neshaminy Presbyterian Church of Warwick, Hartsville
HISTORY shaming ;jr^slrgtiriHn :yjturrh v7".A.:E^-^Arioic, HARTSVILLE, BUCKS COUNTY, PA. 17^6-187^. BY • REV. DfX. TURNER. PUBLISHED BY REQUEST OF THE SESSION. PHILADELPHIA : CULBERTSON & BACHE, PRINTERS, 727 JaYNE StREET. 1876. o o CO TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE. ' Correspondence, • ' ^}. ^i" Succession of Pastors, .... xv • • • • Preface, . • f CHAPTER I. EARLY SETTLEMENT. Jamison's Location of Neshaminy Church.—Forks of Neshaminy.— Corner.—Founding of the Church.—Rev. P. Van Vleck.—Deeds and yiven by WiLiam Penn.—Holland Churches at Feasterville Richborough.—Bensalem.—Few Presbyterian Churches.—The Scotch Irish. ....•• CHAPTER II. REV. WILLIAM TENNENT. Mr. Tennent's birth and education.—His ordination in the Episco- Presbyterian pal Church.—Marriage.—He unites with the Church.—Reasons for his change of ecclesiastical relation.— Takes Residence at Bensalem, Northampton and Warminster.— " Rev. charge of the Church at Neshaminy.—The Old Side."— Grave George Whitefield visits Neshaminy.—Preaches in the § Yard.—" Log College." CHAPTER III. SONS OF REV. WILLIAM TENNENT. N. J., and Rev. Gilbert Tennent.—His pastorate at Kew^ Brunswick, character. Rev. in Philadelphia.—His death and burial.—His William Tennent, Jr.—Education.—Residence in New Bruns- wick.—The trance.—Apparent death and preparation for burial. —His recovery.—Account of his view of Heaven.—Settlement Settlement at Freehold, N. J.—Death. Rev. John Tennent.— early age. Rev. at Freehold.—Usefulness.—Death at an Charles Tennent—Ordination at Whiteclay Creek, Delaware.— with the Residence at Buckingham, Maryland.—His connection "New Side."—Mrs. Douglass. -Rev. William M. Tennent, 19 D. D. — IV CONTENTS. CHAPTER IV. ALUMNI OF LOG COLLEGE. Rev. Samuel Blair.—Settlement at Shrewsbury, N. -
Cause No. ___GRAYSON COX, SABRINA BRADLEY, § in THE
4/26/2016 2:18:17 PM Velva L. Price District Clerk Travis County Cause No. D-1-GN-16-001762____________ D-1-GN-16-001762 Victoria Chambers GRAYSON COX, SABRINA BRADLEY, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT DANIEL DE LA GARZA, PIMPORN MAYO, § JEFFREY MAYO, RYDER JEANES, § JOSEPHINE MACALUSO, AMITY § COURTOIS, PHILIP COURTOIS, ANDREW § BRADFORD, MATTHEW PERRY, § TIMOTHY HAHN, GARY CULPEPPER, § CHERIE HAVARD, ANDREW COULSON, § LANITH DERRYBERRY, LINDA § 126th _____ JUDICIAL DISTRICT DERRYBERRY, ROSEANNE GIORDANI, § BETTY LITTRELL, and BENNETT BRIER, § § Plaintiffs, § v. § § CITY OF AUSTIN, § § Defendant. § TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS’ ORIGINAL PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs Grayson Cox, et al, file this petition for declaratory judgment, complaining of the City of Austin and seeking a declaratory judgment determining and confirming certain important rights guaranteed to them by state statute to protect the use and enjoyment of their property and homes. A. SUMMARY OF THE CASE AND REQUESTED RELIEF 1. This case involves the interpretation of the Valid Petition Rights section of the Texas Zoning Enabling Act, Texas Local Government Code Section 211.006(d) (the “Valid Petition Rights Statute”). That statute requires a ¾ vote of a City Council to approve any change in zoning regulations that are protested by at least 20% of the landowners in the area. 1 The requisite 20% of the neighboring landowners have submitted valid petitions objecting to the approval of the proposed zoning regulation changes for the Grove at Shoal Creek Planned Unit Development (herein “Grove PUD”). That Grove PUD is proposed as a high-density mixed-use development on a 76 acre tract of land at 4205 Bull Creek Road in Austin, Texas, commonly called the “Bull Creek Tract.” 2.