Kierkegaard and Adorno on the Communication of Possibility Clifford Gentry Lee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kierkegaard and Adorno on the Communication of Possibility Clifford Gentry Lee CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Duquesne University: Digital Commons Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2008 Aesthetic Pedagogy: Kierkegaard and Adorno on the Communication of Possibility Clifford Gentry Lee Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Lee, C. (2008). Aesthetic Pedagogy: Kierkegaard and Adorno on the Communication of Possibility (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/810 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AESTHETIC PEDAGOGY: KIERKEGAARD AND ADORNO ON THE COMMUNICATION OF POSSIBILITY A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty Graduate School Of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Clifford Gentry Lee, IV April 2008 Copyright by Clifford Gentry Lee, IV 2008 AESTHETIC PEDAGOGY: KIERKEGAARD AND ADORNO ON THE COMMUNICATION OF POSSIBILITY By Clifford Gentry Lee, IV Approved April 2, 2008 Dr. Ron Polansky, Ph.D. Dr. James Swindal, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy Professor of Philosophy, Chair (Dissertation Director) (Committee Member) Dr. Tom Rockmore, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy (Committee Member) Albert C. Labriola, Ph.D. Dean, McAnulty Graduate School Of Liberal Arts iii ABSTRACT AESTHETIC PEDEGOGY: KIERKEGAARD AND ADORNO ON THE COMMUNICATION OF POSSIBILITY By Clifford Gentry Lee, IV April 2008 Dissertation Supervised by Dr. Ron Polansky, Ph.D. Number of Pages in Text: 349 This dissertation focuses on Adorno’s appropriative reading of Kierkegaard. Adorno interprets Kierkegaard’s notion of the aesthetic as an active philosophical principal. He finds this principle to be at work throughout Kierkegaard’s authorship as the means of the justification of the particular and concrete in defiance of their would be enslavement to the general and abstract. The aesthetic principle is that which requires Kierkegaard’s readers to become active participants in the formation of the experienced meaning of his texts. Adorno’s approach facilitates a reading of Kierkegaard that focuses on his pedagogical use of the communicative power of imagery. At the same time, the attention being drawn to the Kierkegaardian element of Adorno’s philosophy provides a means for comprehending the experiential dimension of Adorno’s writings. Both thinkers write with the goal of communicating awareness of the possibility of human freedom. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract iv Introduction i. Overview of the Project 1 ii. Overview of the Scholarship 20 iii. Chapter Outline 29 I: The Seduction of the Aesthetic in Either/Or Introductory Remarks on the Young Girl 32 i: The Aesthete’s Intoxicant 34 ii: The Speculative Ear 46 iii: Aesthetic Pedagogy 61 iv: Images of Presentiment 100 II: Adorno’s Aesthetic Construction of Kierkegaard i: Pseudonymous Subjectivity 101 Excursus A: The Constellational Roots of Adorno’s Philosophy 109 a: Modern Aesthetics in Miniature 109 b: Schönberg 123 c: Benjamin 128 ii: Adorno’s Thought Image of Kierkegaard 145 III: The Work of Freedom as Communication in the Concept of Anxiety Introductory Remarks 176 i: Innocence and the Word 182 ii: The Demonic 197 iii: Indirect Communication as the Work of Freedom 206 Excursus B: Adorno’s Kant in Negative Dialectics 209 iv: The Aesthetic Dignity of Words 234 IV: Reason’s Sacrificial Productivity in Fear and Trembling and Training in Christianity i: Faith as Transgression 251 ii: Productive Failure of the Image 267 Excursus C: The Artist’s Model: Aesthetic Ideas in Kant’s Critique of Judgment 291 iii: Aesthetic Salvation of the Demonic 315 Conclusion: Aesthetic Pedagogy and the Validation of the Individual Prefatory Remarks 323 i: The Single Individual 325 ii: Negative Dialectics 330 iii: Parting Remarks on the Communication of Possibility 336 Bibliography 339 v Introduction i. Overview of the Project When the word “aesthetic” is used within the context of Søren Kierkegaard’s writings, more times than not, it connotes one of two possibilities: either a way of living or a specific style of writing. The latter refers to the inimitable confluence of the poetic and the philosophical that characterizes much of Kierkegaard’s work. The former, however, refers to a specific theme developed within this authorship – namely, a way of life, contrasted with the ethical and the religious alternatives, characterized by an ironic effort to determine meaning by means of the indeterminate. Understood as three subjective determinative states of meaning from which the individual must choose or by which the individual is chosen, these three stages have become the hallmark of Kierkegaard’s foundational significance for the existential thought of the 20th century. Yet, the developmental movement implied by the hierarchical nature of this idea – from the lowest sphere of the aesthetic through the ethical and on to the heights of the religious – commonly results in a reduction of the meaning of the aesthetic to the religious truths of which it could only be a debasement or to which it unknowingly aspires.1 The 1 This is not to say that the developmental approach to understanding the spheres is, in and of itself, a mistake, but only that the exclusive use of such an approach prevents recognition of the full significance of the aesthetic. Kierkegaard’s prioritization of the religious over the philosophical/aesthetic is a direct following study will not make such an assumption. It will aim to excavate a layer of theoretical richness buried deep within Kierkegaard’s treatment of the aesthetic, one that is only uncovered when liberated from its subservient role and, as a consequence, allowed to show itself at work as a fundamental and irreducible element of Kierkegaard’s thought. Though invariably present, the aesthetic is rarely the recipient of direct definition. A notable occurrence of such directness is found within the second half of Kierkegaard’s first pseudonymous work, Either/Or: A Fragment of Life. Through the voice of Judge William, we hear the following: the esthetic in a person is that by which he spontaneously and immediately is what he is; the ethical is that by which he becomes what he becomes. The person who lives in and by and from and for the esthetic that is in him, that person lives esthetically.2 Focusing attention on what is being said about the aesthetic, we notice that not only is it equated with a state within which one may live, but it is also likened to an ideal one could live by, for, and from; it is more a principle of evaluation, in this case, than a state of being. In his discussion of this passage’s implications for understanding Kierkegaard’s authorship, Louis Mackey claims that here the primary constituent of this ideal is provided as that immediacy which the aesthete, in some way, attempts to be. Which is to say, as a notion essentially linked with the idea of the immediate, the aesthetic has a central role to play in the conceptual drama that is Kierkegaard’s authorship considered inversion of the Hegelian prioritization of philosophy over religion, the truths of which, conversely, are equated with the aesthetic as symbolic/pictorial expressions of the potential unity of consciousness with its object that find their complete expression in the conceptual knowing of philosophy. Cf. sections VII and VIII of G.W.F. Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A.V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977). 2 Søren Kierkegaard, Either/Or: A Fragment of Life, Part 2, trans. Howard Hong and Edna Hong (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987), 172. 2 as a whole. Expressing its centrality, Mackey writes: “immediacy – never possessed but always forfeit, vainly sought and paradoxically bestowed – is the cantus firmus about which the polyphonic Kierkegaardian literature shapes its varied and often dissonant counterpoint.”3 Expanding on this fitting metaphor, the persisting melody of immediacy can be said to be itself composed of notes played through the various conceptual issues immediacy poses to thought. Questions concerning whether or not immediate and concrete experience can be known or experienced as such, how and to what extent reflection is capable of accuracy in its representations, and to what degree is the role language serves in the effective communication of experience itself capable of being communicated, are examples of the individual notes constructive of the melody of immediacy as it plays itself out throughout Kierkegaard’s writings. Therefore, if we wish to comprehend the significance of the aesthetic in his work, thorough attention must be given to the way its constitutive notes, these and other questions of a seeming theoretical nature, all speak to the same issue – the knowing and communicating of immediacy. A consideration of the possibility of the conceptualization and/or communication of immediacy is crucial to Kierkegaard’s strategic attempt to think Hegelian philosophy differently. For Hegel, immediacy is never immediate. All experience assumes a pre- existing I, as the subject of experience, and a pre-existing thing, as the object experienced, both of which he contends are dependent upon conceptual processes preceding the experience itself. Thus, all experience, even that of experience’s immediacy, is the product of mediation.4 Kierkegaard’s philosophical project seeks to 3 Louis Mackey, Kierkegaard: A Kind of Poet (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1971), 3-4. 4 “Among the countless differences cropping up here we find in every case that the crucial one is that, in sense-certainty, pure being at once splits up into what we have called the two ‘Thises’, one ‘This’ as ‘I’, 3 disrupt the hegemonic force expressed by this claim; that is, it aims to restore validity to the immediacy that accompanies concrete experience, to conceive then, contra Hegel, what would appear to be inconceivable.
Recommended publications
  • Critical Theory of Herbert Marcuse: an Inquiry Into the Possibility of Human Happiness
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1986 Critical theory of Herbert Marcuse: An inquiry into the possibility of human happiness Michael W. Dahlem The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dahlem, Michael W., "Critical theory of Herbert Marcuse: An inquiry into the possibility of human happiness" (1986). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5620. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5620 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 This is an unpublished manuscript in which copyright sub­ s is t s, Any further reprinting of its contents must be approved BY THE AUTHOR, Mansfield Library U n iv e rs ity o f Montana Date :_____1. 9 g jS.__ THE CRITICAL THEORY OF HERBERT MARCUSE: AN INQUIRY INTO THE POSSIBILITY OF HUMAN HAPPINESS By Michael W. Dahlem B.A. Iowa State University, 1975 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 1986 Approved by Chairman, Board of Examiners Date UMI Number: EP41084 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Eroticizing Marx, Revolutionizing Freud: Marcuse's Psychoanalytic Turn
    KRITIKE VOLUME THREE NUMBER ONE (JUNE 2009) 10-23 Article Eroticizing Marx, Revolutionizing Freud: Marcuse’s Psychoanalytic Turn Jeffry V. Ocay he conclusion arrived at in the article titled “Heidegger, Hegel, Marx: Marcuse and the Theory of Historicity,” which appeared in a previous issue of this journal, accounts for Herbert Marcuse’s view of the T 1 possibility of the individual to become disposed to radical action. Marcuse thus wants to suggest that there is still hope for the Enlightenment’s project of “emancipation,” and that there is still a revolutionary subject who can carry out this political struggle for liberation. The progression of consciousness which results in a historically conscious individual exemplified by the “conscious slave” in Hegel’s discussion of master-slave relation provided Marcuse the basis of his claim that the individual can be an active and dynamic political subject. Yet the slave who realizes via the notion of labor that it is himself and not the master who is truly free is, after all, still a slave. This means that individuals still need to fight for their freedom.2 Like Marx, Marcuse believes that the internal logic of overproduction and excessive consumption vis-à-vis massive pauperization3 in a capitalist society lead to the self-destruction of society. The capitalist system of overproduction coupled with excessive consumption creates insatiable individuals whose needs and desires are impossible to satisfy.4 This is dangerous for Marcuse because as the society produces more and more to 1 See Jeffry V. Ocay, “Heidegger, Hegel, Marx: Marcuse and the Theory of Historicity,” in KRITIKE: An Online Journal of Philosophy, 2:2 (December 2008), 46-64, <http://www.kritike.org/journal/issue_4/ocay_december2008.pdf>.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcuse's Eros and Civilization
    r- EROS AND CIVILIZATION A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud HERBERT MARCUSE With a N_ew Preface by the Author BEACON PRESS BOSTON Copyright 1955, © 1966 by The Beacon Press Library of Congress catalog card number: 66-3219 WRITTEN IN MEMORY OF International Standard Book Numbers: 0-8070-1554-7 SOPHIE MARCUSE 0-8070-15 55-5 (pbk.) First published as a Beacon Paperback in 1974 1901-1951 Beacon Press books are published under the auspices of the Unitarian Universalist Association All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 Contents PoLmcAL PREFACE 1966 xi PREFACE TO FIRST EDITION xxvii INTRODUCTION 3 PAu I: UNDER THE RULE OF THE REALITY PRINCIPLE 1. The Hidden Trend in Psychoanalysis 11 Pleasure principle and reality principle Genetic and individual repression " Return of the repressed " in civilization Civilization and want: rationalization of renunciation "Remembrance of things past" as vehicle of libera- tion 2. The Origin of the Repressed Individual (Onto- genesis) · 21 The mental apparatus as a dynamic union of opposites Stages in Freud's theory of instincts Common conservative nature of primary instincts Possible supremacy of Nirvana principle Id, ego, superego "Corporealization" of the psyche Reactionary character of superego Evaluation of Freud's basic conception Analysis of the interpretation of history in Freud's psy- chology Distinction between repression and " surplus-repres- • I viii CONTENTS CONTENTS 1X Alienated labor and the performance principle PART II: BEYOND THE REALITY PRINCIPLE Organization
    [Show full text]
  • Adorno's Aesthetics Today
    Adorno’s Aesthetics Today SVEN-OLOV WALLENSTEIN Adorno in the Present In many respects, Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory seems to belong to a past that is moving away from us at increasing speed. Adorno himself acknowledges this belatedness, for instance when in the draft introduction he says that already the very term philosophical aesthetics “has an antiquated quality”.1 In this parti- cular passage his suggestion is tied to what he sees as the nominalism of modern art, whose emergence he locates in Croce and Benjamin, but we may also think of Duchamp’s “pictorial nominalism”, which would render the observation even more acute.2 But while aesthetics must acknowledge that it no longer can subsume its objects, it can just as little opt for mere particularity; there is an inescapable antinomy between empty universality and the con- tingency of particular judgements. And from the vantage point of the present, this seems only to have been exacerbated: no theory appears to be able to delimit a priori what counts as artistic practice, as a work, and as an aesthetic experience—an emptying out that, at the same time as Adorno’s reflections on art were drawing to a close, was registered both in the arts themselves and in many strands of philosophy, notably in institutional art theory, although with- out the historical depth and socio-political urgency that we find in Adorno. If we add to this his infamous resistance to popular art, his highly selective canon of works drawn from an equally selective idea of tradition, and the fact that as time went by he became increasingly remote from the avant-garde of his own present, his obsolescence seems to be confirmed.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Marcuse's Legacies Angela Y. Davis If We Are to Examine Marcuse's
    Marcuse’s Legacies Angela Y. Davis If we are to examine Marcuse’s legacies – and I want to suggest that there are plural legacies – and suggest some future theoretical and practical directions, it seems to me that in seeking to understand the deep connection between his later writings and the political conflicts of the late sixties, we must simultaneously extricate his work from those linkages that have threatened to entomb and romanticize Marcuse’s ideas. Academics and activists alike find it difficult to disassociate Marcuse from the era of the late sixties and early seventies. His persona and his work are often evoked as a marker of a radical era, our primary relationship to which tends to be defined by nostalgia. Consequently, the mention of the name Herbert Marcuse elicits a sigh – many of my generation and older tend to treat him as a sign of our youth – wonderful, exciting, revolutionary, but meaningful only within the context of our reminiscences. Parenthetically, as those of us who came of age during the sixties and early seventies grow older and older, there seems to be a tendency to spatialize „the sixties.“ Recently I have noticed that many people of my generation like to introduce themselves by saying „I come from the sixties“ – the sixties being viewed as a point of origin, an orginary place, rather than an historical moment. It is a place that we evoke with wonder and joy, but one that is forever beyond our reach. Ironically, the very era during which we were encouraged by Herbert Marcuse to think about the radical potential of utopian thought has itself survived in our historical memory as utopia – as a place that is no place.
    [Show full text]
  • The Frankfurt School and Its Writers/Introduction to Literary Theory
    The Frankfurt School and Its Writers/Introduction to Literary Theory Fall 2008, Rutgers University Prof. Nicholas Rennie German 16:470:643:01 [14501]/Comparative O. hrs. M 2:00-3:45pm, Literature 16:195:501:01 [07510] & by appointment Mondays, 4:30-7:10pm Tel. 732-932-7201 195 College Ave. (CAC) [email protected] This seminar focuses on a major interdisciplinary theoretical tradition in German writing, and its influence on selected thinkers of the last decades. Work of the Frankfurt School is among the most important 20th- century German-language contributions to such fields as sociology, political science, gender studies, film, cultural studies and comparative literature. We will read texts by such key figures of the Frankfurt School as Walter Benjamin, Theodor W. Adorno, and Max Horkheimer for their relevance to a number of disciplines, but give particular consideration to literary and aesthetic questions. To this end, we will also read texts by select authors to whom these figures responded (e.g. Baudelaire, Proust, Kafka, Beckett). In the second half of the course we will trace the influence of the first generation of the Frankfurt School in the work of such theorists as Jürgen Habermas, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida and Axel Honneth. Requirements: 1) Weekly attendance, and active participation. 2) One 20-minute presentation, which may be the basis for one of the papers. 3) Three short papers totaling 16 pp. (see due dates below), or one 16-page paper (due 12/15/08). Students who wish to write a single 16-page paper need to receive approval from me before the end of September.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aesthetic Dimension of Experience in the Later Works of John Dewey and Its Relevance to Teaching and Teacher Education Sevket Benhur Oral Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2007 Teaching as consummatory experience: the aesthetic dimension of experience in the later works of John Dewey and its relevance to teaching and teacher education Sevket Benhur Oral Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons, and the Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons Recommended Citation Oral, Sevket Benhur, "Teaching as consummatory experience: the aesthetic dimension of experience in the later works of John Dewey and its relevance to teaching and teacher education" (2007). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 15591. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/15591 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Teaching as consummatory experience: The aesthetic dimension of experience in the later works of John Dewey and its relevance to teaching and teacher education by Sevket Benhur Oral A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Education Program of Study Committee: Carl Smith, Co-major Professor Robert Hollinger, Co-major Professor Geoffrey Abelson Katherine Bruna Betty Wells Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2007 Copyright © Sevket Benhur Oral, 2007. All rights reserved. UMI Number: 3289393 Copyright 2007 by Oral, Sevket Benhur All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Negations Essays in Critical Theory
    Negations Essays in Critical Theory Herbert Marcuse may fly Negations Herbert Marcuse Herbert Marcuse’s Negations is both a radical critique of capitalist modernity and a model of materialist dialectical thinking. In a series of essays, originally written in the period stretching from the 1930s to 1960s, Marcuse takes up the presupposed categories that have, and continue to, ground thought and action in our administered society: liberalism, industrialism, individualism, hedonism, aggres- sion. This book is both a testament to a great thinker and a still vital strand of thought in the comprehension and critique of the mod- ern organized world. It is essential reading for younger scholars and a radical reminder for those steeped in the tradition of a critical theory of society. With a brilliance of conception combined with an insistence on the material conditions of thought and action, this book speaks both to the particular contents engaged and to the fundamental grounds of any critique of organized modernity. may fly www.mayfl ybooks.org Today, at one and the same time, scholarly publishing is drawn in two directions. On the one hand, this is a time of the most exciting theoretical, political and artistic projects that respond to and seek to move beyond global administered society. On the other hand, the publishing industries are vying for total control of the ever-lucrative arena of scholarly publication, creating a situation in which the means of distribution of books grounded in research and in radical interrogation of the present are increasingly restricted. In this context, MayFlyBooks has been established as an independent publishing house, publishing political, theoretical and aesthetic works on the question of organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcuse's Modern Marxism: Utopia for the Twentieth Century
    Lisa Blasch Copyright ©1997 Lisa Blasch There are many utopias. No one has ever seen them except in imagination, and yet they are real enough, for they have influenced our destiny over the centuries. ----- Alain Martineau The socio-political philosophy of Marx and Engels emphasizes both the capacity as well as the inevitability of oppressed peoples to take up arms in a desperate effort to do away with conditions which do not correspond to their true material and psychological needs. This is the process by which the fulfillment of Marx's species- being may eventually become a reality --- a struggle which will annihilate those circumstances which produce a great deal of misery, ending them through conflict. As one of the most successful political theories of the twentieth century in terms of the widespread influence it has had for over a hundred years now, Marxist doctrines translated into political practices have themselves contributed toward a considerable amount of human suffering, as the examples of the Bolshevik and Khmer Rouge revolutions demonstrate. While there is a great deal of justified criticism against labeling these revolutions as being authentically Marxist, the fact remains that to a large extent, many of the violent tactical formulas which were considered justifiable by Marx and Engels have been translated and adopted by twentieth century political movements, quite often with the result that an oppressive order is exchanged for another order which in turn becomes equally oppressive. This may be due, in part, to the fact that the tactics which Marx believed were necessary to liberate humanity and usher in utopian conditions were prescribed for the framework and social conditions of the nineteenth century Industrial Revolution in western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Aesthetics After Adorno
    The Townsend Pa P e r s i n T h e h u m a n i T i e s No. 3 Art and Aesthetics After Adorno Jay M. Bernstein Claudia Brodsky Anthony J. Cascardi Thierry de Duve Aleš Erjavec Robert Kaufman Fred Rush Art and Aesthetics After Adorno The Townsend Pa P e r s i n T h e h u m a n i T i e s No. 3 Art and Aesthetics After Adorno J. M. Bernstein Claudia Brodsky Anthony J. Cascardi Thierry de Duve Aleš Erjavec Robert Kaufman Fred Rush Published by The Townsend Center for the Humanities University of California | Berkeley Distributed by University of California Press Berkeley, Los Angeles, London | 2010 Copyright ©2010 The Regents of the University of California ISBN 978-0-9823294-2-9 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Art and aesthetics after Adorno / J. M. Bernstein...[et al]. p. cm. — (The Townsend papers in the humanities ; no. 3) ISBN 978-0-9823294-2-9 1. Aesthetics, Modern—20th century 2. Aesthetics, Modern—21st century 3. Adorno, Theodor W., 1903–1969. Ästhetische Theorie. I. Bernstein, J. M. BH201.A78 2010 111’.850904—dc22 2010018448 Inquiries concerning proposals for the Townsend Papers in the Humanities from Berkeley faculty and Townsend Center affiliates should be addressed to The Townsend Papers, 220 Stephens Hall, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720- 2340, or by email to [email protected]. Design and typesetting: Kajun Graphics Manufactured in the United States of America Credits and acknowledgements for quoted material appear on page 180–81.
    [Show full text]
  • Aesthetic-Dimension- -Marcuse.Pdf
    THE AESTHETII DlmEDSIOD TOWARD A CRITIQUE OF MARXIST AESTHETICS HERBERT MARC USE Beacon Press Boston Originally published in German under the title Die Permanenz der Kunst: Wider eine bestimmte Marxistische Aesthetik (Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag, copyright© 1977 by Herbert Marcuse) English version translated and revised by Herbert Marcuse and Erica Sherover, copyright© 1978 Beacon Press books are published under the auspices of the Unitarian Universalist Association Published simultaneously in Canada by Fitzhenry & Whiteside Limited, Toronto All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 -9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Marcuse, Herbert, 1896-- The aesthetic dimension. Translation of Die Permanenz der Kunst. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Marx, Karl, 1818-1883 - Aesthetics - Addresses, essays, lectures. 1. Title. B3305.M74M3513 1978 335.4'11 76--9001 ISBN 0-8070-1518-0 Eantents Acknowledgments vii Preface ix I 1 n 22 m 40 IV 54 v 62 Conclusion 71 Notes 75 Bibliography 81 Index 83 v AEknawledgments Erica Sherover has given the manuscript a critical reading from the first draft to the final version. She has discussed with me every paragraph, and insisted on improvements. This little book is dedi­ cated to her: my wife, friend, and collaborator. Intensive discussions with my friends Leo · Lowenthal and Reinhard Lettau have been a great help and a great pleasure. Leo Lowenthal has again proved his reputation as a fierce reader and critic; Reinhard Lettau has demonstrated that authentic literature-literature as resistance-is still possible today.
    [Show full text]
  • One-Dimensionality and the Possibility of Utopia. the Contribution of Herbert Marcuse to a Transformation of the Present
    Journal of Literature and Art Studies, April 2017, Vol. 7, No. 4, 470-479 doi: 10.17265/2159-5836/2017.04.008 D DAVID PUBLISHING One-Dimensionality and the Possibility of Utopia. The Contribution of Herbert Marcuse to a Transformation of the Present Rainer Winter Alpen Adria-Universitaet Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria Introduction Taking the One-Dimensional Man as a starting point, I would like to show in the following what an important contribution the work of Herbert Marcuse can make to a critical theory of the present. More than 50 years after its first publication, this book seems more relevant than ever. It allows us to understand how domination is exerted and maintained in late capitalism that is today organized according to neoliberal principals. It also allows us to ask if there can be alternatives to this society. To date, one-dimensionality has proven itself to be a relevant basic concept of critical theory that first of all analyses society critically as it is by revealing the forces that sustain, legitimize and stabilize the existing structures. However, critical theory is primarily interested in those forces that can negate and subversively circumvent the system and can contribute to emancipation. Therefore, Marcuse thought dialectically, criticizing late capitalistic society from the background of unrealized utopian possibilities and seeking escape routes. His central theme from the thirties to the end of his life was the question of how liberation can be made possible and a utopian condition can be realized that stands beyond the oppression of the given order. This questioning is, however, no longer central in more recent critical theory.
    [Show full text]