DOCSLIB.ORG

October Term, 1954

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
October Term, 1954 : : 1 OCTOBER TERM, 1954 STATISTICS Miscella- Original Appellate Total neous Number of cases on dockets __ 11 843 712 1, 566 Cases disposed of _ _ 0 721 640 1,361 Remaining on dockets 11 122 72 205 Cases disposed of—Appellate Docket By written opinions 86 By per curiam opinions 99 By motion to dismiss or per stipulation (merit cases) 4 By denial or dismissal of petitions for certiorari 532 Cases disposed of—Miscellaneous Docket By written opinion 0 By per curiam opinions 3 By denial or dismissal of petitions for certiorari 494 By denial or withdrawal of other applications 126 By dismissal of appeals 8 By transfer to Appellate Docket 9 Number of written opinions 78 Number of printed per curiam opinions 2 Number of petitions for certiorari granted 120 Number of appeals in which jurisdiction was noted or post- poned 18 Number of admissions to bar (262 admitted Apr. 25) 2, 279 REFERENCE INDEX Page Court convened October 4. Vinson, C. J., resolutions of the Bar presented (Oct. 25) 45 Jackson, J., death of (Oct. 9, 1954) announced 4 Resolutions of the Bar presented (April 4) 182 Harlan, J., commission read and oath taken (March 28) 164 Roberts, J. (resigned), death of (May 17, 1955) announced 254 Frankfurter, J., temporarily assigned to Second Circuit 88 Allotment of Justices 204 313093—55 79 : : II Page Sound amplifying equipment installed in Courtroom on trial basis and used throughout the term Announcement of four-day argument week beginning next term 284 Court adjourned early because of hurricane warning (Oct. 15) _ 35 Conference room session 61 Attorney Change of name 84 Order of disbarment set aside (In re Isserman, 5 Misc.) 7 Rules to show cause why judgments for costs should not be entered (Jones et al.) 176,283 Counsel appointed (468, 815) (See amicus curiae) 116,272 Special Master Motions referred to (9 and 10 Orig.) 9, 143 Compensation awarded (11 Orig.) 256 Rules of Supreme Court—Rule 41 (1) amended so as to require filing of petitioner's or appellant's brief 45 days after case taken, where copies of record can be furnished 284 Opinion amended (153) 220 Order modified (250 Misc.) 120 Judgment announced—no opinion of the Court (51) 167 Judgments affirmed by equally divided Court (28, 157, 213) __ 75, 208 Judgment vacated on jurisdictional statement and case re- manded with directions to dismiss as moot (508) 138 Judgment reversed on jurisdictional statement on authority of recent case (320-322) 218 Judgment state court vacated on jurisdictional statement, case moot (111) 8 Judgment vacated and case remanded with directions to dismiss petition for habeas corpus as moot (118) 63 Judgment vacated on petition for certiorari and case remanded with directions to dismiss as moot (604) (581 Misc.) 218,272 Judgment vacated on petition for certiorari and case remanded to Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of order of Corp. Comm. of Oklahoma (274) 63 Judgment vacated on petition for certiorari and case remanded "for disposition agreeable to the representation of counsel for respondents" (427) 93 Judgment vacated in series of cases on petition for certiorari and cases remanded to Court of Appeals for consideration in light of "net worth decisions" (12 etc.) 102 Judgment vacated on petition for certiorari upon consideration of confession of error and examination of record (31 Misc.) _ 128 Judgment vacated on petition for certiorari and earlier judg- ment reinstated (534) 156 : in Page Judgment vacated on petition for certiorari and case remanded to Court of Appeals for consideration of certain question (644) 237 Judgment vacated on petition for certiorari and case remanded for new trial in accordance with the Government's suggestion (663) 264 Judgment state court reversed on petition for certiorari (567) _ 161 Judgment reversed on petition for certiorari (88, 530, 525) 7, 143, 156 Judgment reversed on petition for certiorari and case remanded with directions to dismiss indictment (416) 93 Judgment reversed on petition for certiorari and cases re- manded for retrial "in the interests of justice and in the exer- cise of the supervisory powers of this Court" (538, 548) 161 Judgment reversed on petition for certiorari citing recent de- cisions (450 etc.) 168 Judgment reversed on petition for certiorari on consideration of confession of error and authority of recently decided case (595) 236 Order of Court of Appeals reversed on petition for certiorari "insofar as it denies petitioners leave to proceed in forma pauperis" citing Adkins v. DuPont, 335 U. S. 331 (327 Misc.) 129 Amicus curiae : Solicitor General invited to argue (357, 236) 65, 144 Solicitor General invited to file brief (220, 186, 236) 10, 13 Argued with consent of party (20, 53, 97, 184, 367) 40,224, 73, 125, 151, 152 Invited to argue in support of judgment (261, see opinion) _ 85 Invited to argue on behalf of petitioner (412, see opinion) _ 156 Leave to file brief granted (131, 406, 357, 394) 116, 129, 169 Leave to file brief denied with two justices dissenting (157) 144 Six states and the United States argued as amici curiae in school segregation cases 213 Case called to attention of National Mediation Board with Court expressing "its readiness to accept any brief it might wish to submit" (131) 116 Argument pro hac vice (119) 71 Argument Motion to postpone granted (301) 138 Court declined to hear further argument (368) 153 Motion to remove from summary calendar granted (417) __ 169 Twelve and one-half hours in school segregation cases 211 Case ordered argued after submission on briefs (261) 78, 85 : : IV Argument—Continued Page Cases continued "in view of absence of a full Court" (school segregation cases) 85 No cases heard from Nov. 18 to Jan. 31 due to operation of new rules. Reargument ordered (20, 157, 213, 150) 76,246,272 Brief: Motion to strike opposition for reason of late filing granted (166) 24 Motion to strike because two cases consolidated, denied (191 and 321) 138 Memoranda requested after argued case considered in con- ference (387) 237 Damages—motion for, denied (79 Misc., 581) 93,202 In forma pauperis—motion to so proceed granted and certiorari denied in case where court below had denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis (541 Misc.) (see also 327 Misc., page 129) _ 275 Veteran—motion to proceed as, granted (246) 57 Motion to clarify and define assignments of error denied (162)_ 9 Motion as to printing record denied (236) 93,119 Parties Motion to add party denied without prejudice to renewal on remand to District Court (230) 143 Substitution of state officer permitted where it was shown that he had been in office more than six months (204) 117 Stay, referred to Court, denied (414) 57 Stay of execution granted (Irvin) 61 Bail, referred to Court, denied (393 Misc.) 112 Appeal from and certiorari to U. S. Court of Appeals—judg- ment affirmed and writ dismissed (6, see opinion) 92 Appeal dismissed for want of final judgment with three Justices dissenting (594) 202 Appeal papers treated as petition for certiorari as to questions not reviewable on appeal (250 Misc., 701) 120, 256 Certiorari Original petition granted and supplemental petition denied (145) 12 Motion to file supplement to petition granted (478) 169 Denied without prejudice to prosecute appeal in state court (2 Misc.) ; to file habeas corpus in U. S. District Court (53 Misc., 285, 47 Misc.) 32, 59, 98 Denied for reason judgment based on state grounds ade- quate to support it (318) 59 : V Certiorari—Continued pag6 Motion for an order nunc pro tunc extending time to file petition where there had been a delay in transit denied (I. L. W. U. v. N. L. R. B.) 104 Writs dismissed as improvidently granted (32, 28, see opinion, 20, see opinion) 128,236,270 Rehearing Granted and order of disbarment vacated (5 Misc., see order) 7 Granted (622 O. T. 1953—on petition for certiorari; 304 O. T. 1953—after decision on the merits and also after expiration of judgment term, see 28 U. S. C. 452), and cases remanded for reconsideration in light of "net worth decisions" 103 Granted after affirmance by equally divided Court and writ dismissed as improvidently granted (28, see opinion) — 236 Granted after affirmance by equally divided Court (157, 213) 246 Time to file limited (742) 265 call Order suspending of docket entered April 18, 1955 ; argu- ments completed April 22 221 Final order (June 6, 1955) 284 D S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE* I9S» — ;; MONDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1954 1 SUPREME COUET OE THE UNITED STATES Present: Mr. Chief Justice Warren, Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Keed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Jack- son, Mr. Justice Burton, Mr. Justice Clark, and Mr. Justice Minton. Blum, of Wantagh, Y. George A. Murphy, of Freeport, Lowell N. ; ; William J. Deeley, Jr., of Freeport, N. Y. Irving E. Dickman, N. Y. ; of Seaford, K Y.; Albert A. Oppido, of New Hyde Park, N. Y.; Byron G. van Home, of Mineola, N. Y. ; Nathanial S. Rudes, of Lynbrook, N. Y. ; Comunardo L. Renzulli, of Rockville Centre, N. Y. Edward T. O'Brien, of Westbury, N. Y. ; Edward C. Schiffmacher, of Baldwin, N. Y. ; Nathaniel A. Kahn, of West Hempstead, N. Y. Howard A. Rochford, of Rockville Centre, N. Y. ; Abraham H. Mos- kowitz, of Merrick, N. Y. ; Alvin L. Weil, of Westbury, N. Y. ; Ben- jamin Beskin, of Wantagh, N. Y. ; Richard E. Rahn, of Massapequa, N. Y. ; Leonard L. Rivkin, of Freeport, N. Y. ; William Gitelman, of Merrick, N. Y. ; Frank Makara, of New York, N. Y. ; James W. Clair, of East Rockaway, N.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SENATE CALL of the ROLL Iilaho.-Henry C
    <tongrrssional1Rcrord· United States PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 85th CONGRESS,. SECOND SESSION of America SENATE CALL OF THE ROLL Iilaho.-Henry C. Dworshak and Mr. MANSFIELD. I suggest the ab­ Frank Church. Illinois.-Paul H. Douglas and Everett TUESDAY, JANUARY 7, 1958 sence of a quorum. The VICE PRESIDENT. The Secre­ McKinley Dirksen. The 7th day of January being the day tary will call the roll. Indiana.-Homer E. Capehart and prescribed by Public Law 290, 85th The Chief Clerk <Emery L. Frazier) William E. Jenner. Congress, 1st session, for the m-eeting of <mlled the roll, and the following Sena· I owa.-Bourke B. Hiekenlooper and the 2d session of the 85th Congress, the Thos. E. Martin. tors answered to their names: Kansas.-Andrew F. Scboeppel and Senate assembled in its Chamber at the Aiken Goldwater Morse Capitol · Allott Gore Mundt Frank Carlson. RICHARD .M. NIXON, of California, Anderson Green Murray Kentucky.-John s. c ·ooper and Barrett Hayden Neely Thruston B. Morton. Vice President of the United States, Beall .Hennings Neuberger called the Senate to order at 12 o•clock 13ennett Hicken1ooper O'Mahoney Louisiana.-Allen J. Ellender and meridian. .Bible Hill Pastore Russell B. Long. .Bricker Holla;nd Payne Maine.-Margaret Chase Smith and The Chaplain, Rev. Frederick Brown Bush Hruska. Potter Harris, D. D., of the city of Washington, Butler .Humphrey Proxmire Frederick G. Payne. offered the following prayer; 13yrd Ives Purtell Maryland.-John Marshall Butler and Capehart Jackson Revercomb J. Glenn Beall. Our Father God, in the stillness of Carlson Javits Robertson Carroll Jenner Russell Massachusetts.-Leverett Saltonstall this hushed moment, in this solemn hour Oase, s.
    [Show full text]
  • New Life Old Cities
    New Life in Old Cities by Mason Gaffney Robert Schalkenbach Foundation New York Acknowledgments Yisroel Pensack gave lavishly of his time, talent and editorial experience to upgrade and clarify my prose. I am also indebted to Robert Andelson, Clifford Cobb, Richard Biddle, Dick Netzer, Jeffrey Smith, Heather Remoff, Daniel Sullivan, Herbert Barry, William Batt, Nicolaus Tideman, Robert Piper, Robert Fitch, Michael Hudson, Joshua Vincent and Ed O’Donnell for editorial and substantive corrections and additions, most of which I have used. My greatest debt is to Mary M. Cleveland, whose holistic mind and conscientious gentle prodding, reaching across a continent, have guided me to integrate the parts into a coherent whole. I bear sole responsibility for the final product. Mason Gaffney New Life in Old Cities Third Edition Designed by Lindy Davies Paperback ISBN 978-1-952489-01-3 Copyright © 2006, 2014, 2020 Robert Schalkenbach Foundation New York City Tel.: 212-683-6424 www.schalkenbach.org Email: [email protected] CONTENTS Introduction New York City Reborn, 1920-31 Growth Spurts in Some Other Cities L’Envoi Appendices Bibliography About the Author Mason Gaffney recently retired from active teaching at the University of California, Riverside. Prior to Riverside, he was a Professor of Economics at several Universities, a journalist with TIME, Inc., a researcher with Resources for the Future, Inc., the head of the British Columbia Institute for Economic Policy Analysis, which he founded, and an economic consultant to several businesses and government agencies. His most recent book is The Mason Gaffney Reader: Essays on Solving the Unsolvable. He is also the author of After the Crash: Designing a Depression-Free Economy (2009) and, with Fred Harrison, of The Corruption of Economics (1994) as well as numerous scholarly articles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Honorable John Marshall Butler United States Senate Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce Washington 25, D
    The Honorable John Marshall Butler United States Senate Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce Washington 25, D. C. Dear Senator Butler: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of June 24, 1957 enclosing a copy of a letter received by you from Mr. L. P. Hubbard of Baltimore, Maryland. Mr. Hubbard suggests that corporations be required to make available to a central committee of its stockholders a list of all stockholders in order that they may arrange regional meetings to discuss matters of common interest and to send delegates to a national committee with instructions to attend annual meetings and vote their proxies for them. As you know some of the States have laws which require corporations to make a list of stockholders available for inspection by stockholders. Rule X-14A-7 of the Commission’s proxy rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires listed companies which intend to solicit proxies either to furnish stockholders, upon request, a reasonably current list of stockholders or to mail for such stockholders any proxy material which they may wish to transmit to other stockholders. In some cases, corporations will elect to mail the material in lieu of furnishing a list of stockholders and in other cases they will elect to turn over to the stockholders a list of stockholders. In addition to the above requirement, Rule X-14A-8 of the proxy rules requires an issuer to include in its proxy material proposals which are proper matters for stockholder action and which a stockholder wishes to submit to a vote of his fellow stockholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Philip Allen Lacovara
    Arbitration Experience Philip Allen Chairman, sole arbitrator, or tribunal/panel member in arbitrations administered Lacovara by International Chamber of Commerce, London Court of International Arbitration, JAMS, International Centre for Dispute Resolution, American Arbitration Association, Netherlands Arbitration Institute, Swiss Chamber’s Arbitration Institution, and ad hoc arbitrations governed by Federal Arbitration Act, English Arbitration Act, etc. Independent Arbitrator Arbitral experience in matters including telecommunications, intellectual property, insurance and re-insurance, executive employment, construction, mining, heavy equipment manufacturing, aviation, licensing and distribution, pharmaceuticals, technology, partnership dissolution, mergers & acquisitions and earn outs, financial transactions, energy supply contracts, securities underwriting, etc. Mediation experience in matters involving financial services, securities, executive employment, technology licensing, contracting, franchise distribution, construction, insurance and reinsurance coverage, class actions, hedge funds, professional malpractice, etc. Professional Affiliations ▪ Fellow, The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (London). ▪ Fellow, College of Commercial Arbitrators ▪ Panel of International Arbitrators, International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR) (international affiliate of American Arbitration Association). ▪ Chambers Band 1: Leading International Arbitrators. ▪ Member, London Court of International Arbitration. ▪ JAMS, The Resolution Experts:
    [Show full text]
  • The Honorable Hubert H. Humphrey United States Senate Washington, D
    I The University of Chicago Chicago 37, Illinois August 2, 1955 The Honorable Hubert H. Humphrey United States Senate Washington, D. C. Dear Senator Humphrey: You asked me what function I thought the Subcommittee on Dis­ armament of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee might fulfill in the short period of time and with the limited means available between now and the first of January, and you suggested that I put my thoughts on paper. The main issue as far as substance is concerned, it seems to me, can be phrased as follows: 11 What kind and what degree of disarmament is desirable within the framework of what political settlement?" It seems to me that one would only add to the already existing confusion if disarma­ ment were discussed without stating clearly what is being assumed concern­ ing the political settlement within which it would have to operate. I assume that few Senators will be available between the im­ pending adjournment of Congress and the first of January, and thusthe ques­ tion is what could be accomplished by a competent staff. I believe such a staff could hold conferences of the fol_lowing sort: Men like Walter Lippman, George Kennan, and perhaps five to ten others who in the past have written on one aspect of the problem or another, would be asked to prepare their thoughts on the "whole problem" and to tell to a critical audience, assembled by the staff, what they would regard as a desirable settlement. They must imagine that somehow they are endowed with such magical power of persuasion that they could convince the
    [Show full text]
  • Of Judicial Independence Tara L
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 71 | Issue 2 Article 3 2018 The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence Tara L. Grove Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Tara L. Grove, The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence, 71 Vanderbilt Law Review 465 (2019) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol71/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence Tara Leigh Grove* The federal judiciary today takes certain things for granted. Political actors will not attempt to remove Article II judges outside the impeachment process; they will not obstruct federal court orders; and they will not tinker with the Supreme Court's size in order to pack it with like-minded Justices. And yet a closer look reveals that these "self- evident truths" of judicial independence are neither self-evident nor necessary implications of our constitutional text, structure, and history. This Article demonstrates that many government officials once viewed these court-curbing measures as not only constitutionally permissible but also desirable (and politically viable) methods of "checking" the judiciary. The Article tells the story of how political actors came to treat each measure as "out of bounds" and thus built what the Article calls "conventions of judicial independence." But implicit in this story is a cautionary tale about the fragility of judicial independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Adjutant General's Report
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) PUBLIC DOCUJ\iENTS OF MAINE: BEING THE It ANNUAL REPORTS OF VARIOUS PUBLIC OFFICERS AND INSTITUTIONS FOR THE YEAR • 1867-8. -... - AUGUSTA: OWEN & NASH, PRINTERS TO THE STATE, 1868. ANNUA_L REPORT OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MAINE, FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1867. PUBLISHED AGREEABLY TO .A. RESOLVE APPROVED FEBRUARY 23, 1865. AUGUSTA: STEVENS & SAYWARD, PRINTERS TO THE STATE. 1868. STATE OF MAINE. ADJUTANT GENERAL'S OFFICE, } Augusta, December 31st, 1867. To His Excellency J. L. CHAMBERLAIN, Governor and Commander-in- Chief: Sm :-I have the honor to transmit herewith my report as Adju­ tant General, and Acting Quartermaster and Paymaster General, for the year ending December 31st, 1867. Very respectfully, Your obedient servant, JOHN C. CALDWELL, Adjutant General. )I ADJUTANT GENERAL'S REPORT. STATE PENSIONS FOR 1866. The following act of the Legislature was approved February 23d, 1866: AN ACT authorizing Pensions for Disabled Soldiers and Seamen. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in Legislature assembled, as follows: SECTION I. Any person who bas served in the army or navy of the United States, in the war of eighteen hundred and sixty-one, on the quota of Maine, and who has been disabled by wounds or other injury receiv~d in said service and in the line of duty, shall be entitled to a pension from the State of Maine, not exceeding eight dollars per month.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republican Journal: Vol. 89, No. 34
    Thc Republican Journal ~ VOU ME 80_ BELFAST, MAINE. THURSDAY. APOITST 1A17 .... ■^ Contents ot Today’s Journal. OBITUARY. NORTHPORT. The Northport Country Club. — I ihe Draft.. .Obituary. ..The North PERSONAL. 1 PERSONAL. I the personal. ■' burch Auxiliary at Battery., — Mrs. Mary A. Cheever died Aug. 15th Dick i f Ttu> News of The Granges. .North- Phinning of Roslindale has arriv- Owing to a little mix-up in the Mrs. I. L. at the home of her Mrs. A. dates, Wilband of Thomaston ar- | Colonial Theatre. .The North- daughter, E. ed for his annual Mrs. Martha Cummings of Boston is Miss Lou Smalley left {u)rt. visit dance scheduled for Aug. 31& will not be rived to visit friends. last Thursday to | rt Country Club. .Personal. Smith on Allyn where she recently the street, |had Mrs. guest of Mrs. Camilla W. Hazeltine. visit relatives in Castine. .Four Minute Talks. .Pe- A. M. Fernald of Belfast is held, but there will be a dinner and dance I Editorials. been for the past two months, coming visit- Hon. Frank E. Guernsey of Dover was the Heifer. .Trans- friends in on the Labor Miss Lillian Ames of Boston was the Alfred Johnson of veioping Dairy ing Northport. following Monday, Day. in Belfast last Brookline, Mass., in Real from her home in Prospect Mrs. Friday on business. (era Estate..Only Young guest of Miss H. arrived for a On this occasion a special dinner will be Grace Hall the past Wednesday short visit, i.enerals for France. .Snap Shots, Cheever was born i> Ted Burd has arrived from Monroe in 1838, the Boston for Miss Helen Wescott left recently to week.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion-From Privacy to Equality: the Failure of the Justifications for Taking Human Life
    ESSAY ABORTION-FROM PRIVACY TO EQUALITY: THE FAILURE OF THE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR TAKING HUMAN LIFE Robert John Araujo, S.J.° TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1738 II. EQUALITY RECONSIDERED .................................................. 1741 III. EQUALITY'S SOURCE- THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE .............................. 1744 IV. A CONTEMPORARY AND PROBLEMATIC UNDERSTANDING OF EQUALITY .......................................... 1745 V. EQUALITY IN THE CONTEXT OF ABORTION "RIGHTS" CLAIMS-THE FOUNDATION OF RoE ................... 1747 VI. THE UNSATISFACTORY CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUM ENTS OF ROE ........................................................... 1754 VII. ROE AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT .......................... 1758 VIII. THE SEARCH FOR NEW CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENTS-CASEY ........................... 1763 IX. THE EMERGENCE OF THE EQUALITY ARGUMENT ................ 1766 * Visiting Professor of Law, Boston College. The Author would like to thank Professor Richard Myers for his valuable comments to an earlier draft of this Essay. The Author expresses his gratitude to the American College of Pediatricians for their kind permission to include their materials in the Appendix to this Essay. 1737 HeinOnline -- 45 Hous. L. Rev. 1737 2008-2009 1738 HOUSTON LAW REVIEW [45:5 X. EQUALITY COMES OF AGE IN THE CARHART CASES ............1772 XI. EQUALITY, YES-BUT EQUALITY FOR ALL .......................... 1779 X II. CONCLUSION ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Users\User1\Documents
    Date:June 3,2021 Last Web Update:September 2,2020 WHITLOCK FAMILY RESEARCH - PRINTED & ORIGINAL SOURCES R0001/20 Research by Wilfred John Whitlock - Whitlocks of Langtree, Devon to 1968 R0002/7 Whitlocks of Devon research by J.R. Powell Nov.1910 R0002A/5 Whitlocks of Warkleigh, Langtree, Parkham, Devon from Kate Johnson (nee Whitlock) June 1968 R0003/6 Photocopies of Whitelocke entries in Biographical Dictionary R0004/1 Whitlocks of Warkleigh with connection to Whitlocks of Illinois by Frank M. Whitlock 1936 R0004A/1 Whitlocks of Warkleigh descent from John Lake of Bradmore (Bodleian Library:Rawl D 287) R0004B/1 Whitlocks of Warkleigh descent from John Lake from Visitation of Devon (edit J.L. Vivian. Exeter 1895) R0005/4 Letter from M.M. Johns to Elmo Ashton re Whitlocks of Langtree, Devon R0006/2 Biography of Brand Whitlock (1869-1934) R0007/3 Whitlocks of Devon parish register extracts R0008/1 Biography of Percy Whitlock (1903-1946) from Grove's Dictionary of Music and Musicians from M.M. Johns R0009/1 Letter Dd. June 7,1906 from J. Stanley Wedlock of Stanley Bridge, P.E.I.. to John Whitlock of Holdsworthy (sic), Devon R0010/3 Whitlock extracts from Biographical Dictionaries from J.E.I. Wyatt R0011/2 Alumni Oxonienses, The Members of the University of Oxford, 1500-1714 by Joseph Foster from Ruth Spalding R0012/1 Biographical sketch of Thomas Whitlock (1806-1875)'s life by Rev.W.C.Beer R0013/54 Whitlocks of Berkshire descent from John Whitlock & Agnes De la Beche (M about 1454) from J. Wyatt 1969 R0014/ (renumbered) R0015/1 Newspaper clipping re 50th Wedding Anniversary of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the College of William and Mary from Its Foundation, 1693
    1693 - 1870 m 1m mmtm m m m&NBm iKMi Sam On,•'.;:'.. m '' IIP -.•. m : . UBS . mm W3m BBSshsR iillltwlll ass I HHH1 m '. • ml §88 BmHRSSranH M£$ Sara ,mm. mam %£kff EARL GREGG SWEM LIBRARY THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA Presented By Dorothy Dickinson PIPPEN'S a BOOI^ a g OllD STORE, 5j S) 60S N. Eutaw St. a. BALT WORE. BOOES EOUOE' j ESCHANQED. 31 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/historyofcollege1870coll 0\JI.LCkj£ THE HISTORY College of William and Mary From its Foundation, 1693, to 1870. BALTIMOKE: Printed by John Murphy & Co. Publishers, Booksellers, Printers and Stationers, 182 Baltimore Street. 1870. Oath of Visitor, I. A. B., do golemnly promise and swear, that I will truly and faith- fully execute the duties of my office, as a vistor of William and Mary College, according to the best of my skill and judgment, without favour, affection or partiality. So help me God. Oath of President or Professor. I, do swear, that I will well and truly execute the duties of my office of according to the best of my ability. So help me God. THE CHARTER OF THE College of William and Mary, In Virginia. WILLIAM AND MARY, by the grace of God, of England, Scot- land, France and Ireland, King and Queen, defenders of the faith, &c. To all to whom these our present letters shall come, greeting. Forasmuch as our well-beloved and faithful subjects, constituting the General Assembly of our Colony of Virginia, have had it in their minds, and have proposed
    [Show full text]
  • Feminism & Philosophy Vol.5 No.1
    APA Newsletters Volume 05, Number 1 Fall 2005 NEWSLETTER ON FEMINISM AND PHILOSOPHY FROM THE EDITOR, SALLY J. SCHOLZ NEWS FROM THE COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF WOMEN, ROSEMARIE TONG ARTICLES MARILYN FISCHER “Feminism and the Art of Interpretation: Or, Reading the First Wave to Think about the Second and Third Waves” JENNIFER PURVIS “A ‘Time’ for Change: Negotiating the Space of a Third Wave Political Moment” LAURIE CALHOUN “Feminism is a Humanism” LOUISE ANTONY “When is Philosophy Feminist?” ANN FERGUSON “Is Feminist Philosophy Still Philosophy?” OFELIA SCHUTTE “Feminist Ethics and Transnational Injustice: Two Methodological Suggestions” JEFFREY A. GAUTHIER “Feminism and Philosophy: Getting It and Getting It Right” SARA BEARDSWORTH “A French Feminism” © 2005 by The American Philosophical Association ISSN: 1067-9464 BOOK REVIEWS Robin Fiore and Hilde Lindemann Nelson: Recognition, Responsibility, and Rights: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory REVIEWED BY CHRISTINE M. KOGGEL Diana Tietjens Meyers: Being Yourself: Essays on Identity, Action, and Social Life REVIEWED BY CHERYL L. HUGHES Beth Kiyoko Jamieson: Real Choices: Feminism, Freedom, and the Limits of the Law REVIEWED BY ZAHRA MEGHANI Alan Soble: The Philosophy of Sex: Contemporary Readings REVIEWED BY KATHRYN J. NORLOCK Penny Florence: Sexed Universals in Contemporary Art REVIEWED BY TANYA M. LOUGHEAD CONTRIBUTORS ANNOUNCEMENTS APA NEWSLETTER ON Feminism and Philosophy Sally J. Scholz, Editor Fall 2005 Volume 05, Number 1 objective claims, Beardsworth demonstrates Kristeva’s ROM THE DITOR “maternal feminine” as “an experience that binds experience F E to experience” and refuses to be “turned into an abstraction.” Both reconfigure the ground of moral theory by highlighting the cultural bias or particularity encompassed in claims of Feminism, like philosophy, can be done in a variety of different objectivity or universality.
    [Show full text]