Please Do Not Reply to This Email. Public Comments on Equipment

Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Paul Last Name: Kaefer Mailing Address: 425 W Maple St City: Lombard Country: United States State or Province: IL ZIP/Postal Code: 60148 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: null Comment: Dear FCC,

I request that you do not create rules that prevent users from installing the software of their choosing on computing devices. As a student who has finished a degree in computer engineering and is likely to continue his education in computing fields, it is of paramount concern to my learning that I am able to explore many software packages. These include proprietary software as well as free and open source software.

Research hinges on open access to information. Embedded systems research into processing hardware and wireless networking hardware depend on the use of systems over which the researcher has full control.

One of the great things about our country are many freedoms that we have worked hard to keep. Please allow people to be free in the digital domain. I urge you to protect and encourage free and open source software and hardware, and not force anybody to use software that they do not want.

Paul Kaefer B.S., Computer Engineering M.S., Computational Sciences Computer Hobbyist

Dear FCC,

One of the best courses I took as a student was Operating Systems. We built an operating system on an embedded system from the ground up. The course would not have been the same had we had to work around proprietary firmware. We learned how every part of the computer works, and were able to do so because it was a transparent system. Research hinges on open access to information. Embedded systems research into processing hardware and wireless networking hardware depend on the use of systems over which the researcher has full control.

Paul Kaefer B.S., Computer Engineering M.S., Computational Sciences Computer Hobbyist Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Brent Last Name: Roman Mailing Address: 425 Clinton Street City: Santa Cruz Country: United States State or Province: CA ZIP/Postal Code: 95062 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: n/a Comment: Many devices consist of a modular (WiFi) transceiver integrated with a general purpose embedded computer. The computer does not control low-level aspects of the radio. It merely uses it to perform high level functions.

However, it is often in the manufactures' best interest to restrict the functions of that computer in order to sell a greater number of specialized devices. Very often these embedded computers are running open source software, whose licensing requires that manufactures' publish their internal source code. The manufactures typically choose to base their firmware on open source software because this saves them significant development costs.

Third parties often enhance restricted open-source based device firmware to add functions to the device that the manufacture did not intend. These alternative firmwares are typically installed by end users to avoid the cost and power consumption associated with racks of specialized single function devices that would otherwise be required. These enhancements better utilize the general purpose computers in these devices thereby reducing overall power consumption and fostering innovation in the marketplace.

Such "Modification of Certified Equipment by Third Parties" should be encouraged by FCC rules. Specifically, no new certification should be required in cases where the low-level operation of modular transmitters in the device is not affected by the Third Party Firmware.

Many devices consist of a modular (WiFi) transceiver integrated with a general purpose embedded computer. The computer does not control low-level aspects of the radio. It merely uses it to perform high level functions.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Jahidur Last Name: Rahman Mailing Address: 40, KAWRANBAZAR, DHAKA- 1215 City: Dhaka Country: Bangladesh State or Province: DEMRA ZIP/Postal Code: 1215 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: I object this because security and privacy is *important* to me

I object this because security and privacy is *important* to me Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Colby Last Name: Taperts Mailing Address: 3711 Delgado Dr City: New Orleans Country: United States State or Province: LA ZIP/Postal Code: 70119 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: Please do not allow this to become a law.

Please do not allow this to become a law. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Kris Last Name: Holmes Mailing Address: 506 SW Garfield Ave. City: Topeka Country: United States State or Province: KS ZIP/Postal Code: 66606 Email Address: Organization Name: Comment: This regulation will have two major detriments to American citizens. The first harm will be to the advancement of American technology and research. For example:

The second major harm would be to American commerce and rule of law. That is to say, if the FCC forces companies to lock wireless-capable devices (including smart phones and PCs) and essentially ban consumers from modifying their own property to suit their needs, one of two results (or some combination thereof) will occur. Either:

1. Consumers will buy non-American products, and if non-American products must be so modified as to comply with this regulation to be sold in the United States, consumers will buy non-American versions through grey market or black market channels. At best, this damages American companies and harms local and state sales tax revenues. At worst, it erodes respect for the rule of law, similar to the way Prohibition did in the 1920s.

2. Technology-savvy consumers will begin to manufacture or modify non-regulated 'rogue' hot spots, routers and similar devices. Again, this erodes respect for the rule of law. Also, instead of making the FCC more capable of regulating the use of wireless technology, it will eventually strip the FCC of the ability to effectively regulate wireless communication at all, while simultaneously causing it to appear draconian and/or ridiculous in the eyes of the public.

In short, passing this regulation will, in the short term, harm American technology research and sales, while in the long term, it will harm America as a nation and the FCC as an effective regulatory agency.

This regulation will have two major detriments to American citizens. The first harm will be to the advancement of American technology and research. For example:

1. Wireless networking research depends on the ability of researchers to investigate and modify their devices. 2. Americans need the ability to fix security holes in their devices when the manufacturer chooses to not do so. 3. Users have in the past fixed serious bugs in their wifi drivers, which would be banned under the NPRM. 4. Billions of dollars of commerce, such as secure wifi vendors, retail hotspot vendors, depends on the ability of users and companies to install the software of their choosing. The second major harm would be to American commerce and rule of law. That is to say, if the FCC forces companies to lock wireless-capable devices (including smart phones and PCs) and essentially ban consumers from modifying their own property to suit their needs, one of two results (or some combination thereof) will occur. Either:

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Peter Last Name: Dusch Mailing Address: 2305 12th Ave City: Beaver Falls Country: United States State or Province: PA ZIP/Postal Code: 15010 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: In regards to: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices

DO NOT implement rules that take away the ability of users to install the software of their choosing on their computing devices.

Wireless networking research depends on the ability of researchers to investigate and modify their devices.

Americans need the ability to fix security holes in their devices when the manufacturer chooses to not do so.

Users have in the past fixed serious bugs in their wifi drivers, which would be banned under the NPRM.

Billions of dollars of commerce, such as secure wifi vendors, retail hotspot vendors, depends on the ability of users and companies to install the software of their choosing.

Seriously, how can you even think of limiting a person from what I consider a science? Too many people learn a lot about technology and contribute to the progress of our world by being able to customize their own property. Freedom to choose, freedom to learn, freedom to create your own solutions!

In regards to: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices

DO NOT implement rules that take away the ability of users to install the software of their choosing on their computing devices.

Wireless networking research depends on the ability of researchers to investigate and modify their devices.

Americans need the ability to fix security holes in their devices when the manufacturer chooses to not do so.

Users have in the past fixed serious bugs in their wifi drivers, which would be banned under the NPRM.

Billions of dollars of commerce, such as secure wifi vendors, retail hotspot vendors, depends on the ability of users and companies to install the software of their choosing.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Paco Last Name: Malazarte Mailing Address: 5553 Jacobs Field St. City: Las Vegas Country: United States State or Province: NV ZIP/Postal Code: 89148 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: I'd like to ask the to FCC not implement rules that take away the ability of users to install alternative operating systems of their choosing on their computing devices.

I'd like to ask the to FCC not implement rules that take away the ability of users to install alternative operating systems of their choosing on their computing devices. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Matthew Last Name: Dratt Mailing Address: 80210 Cauliflower Lane City: Beaverly Hills Country: United States State or Province: CA ZIP/Postal Code: 90210 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: Don't take away people's ability to install custom software on their own devices, or prevent wireless networking research through user-based means, discourage the development of alternative free and open source WiFi firmware, or prevent resellers from installing firmware on routers.

Don't take away people's ability to install custom software on their own devices, or prevent wireless networking research through user-based means, discourage the development of alternative free and open source WiFi firmware, or prevent resellers from installing firmware on routers. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Joesph Last Name: Vaughn Mailing Address: 1315 S. Darrow City: Tempe Country: United States State or Province: AZ ZIP/Postal Code: 85281 Email Address: Organization Name: Comment: Please do not passing this. We should have the right to install open source operating systems on devices that we purchase.

Wireless networking research depends on the ability of researchers to investigate and modify their devices.

Americans need the ability to fix security holes in their devices when the manufacturer chooses to not do so.

Users have in the past fixed serious bugs in their wifi drivers, which would be banned under the NPRM.

Billions of dollars of commerce, such as secure wifi vendors, retail hotspot vendors, depends on the ability of users and companies to install the software of their choosing.

Please do not passing this. We should have the right to install open source operating systems on devices that we purchase.

Wireless networking research depends on the ability of researchers to investigate and modify their devices.

Americans need the ability to fix security holes in their devices when the manufacturer chooses to not do so.

Users have in the past fixed serious bugs in their wifi drivers, which would be banned under the NPRM.

Billions of dollars of commerce, such as secure wifi vendors, retail hotspot vendors, depends on the ability of users and companies to install the software of their choosing. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Brian Last Name: Nisonger Mailing Address: 10011 Wallingford Ave N City: Seattle Country: United States State or Province: WA ZIP/Postal Code: 98133 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: Although DD-Wrt and other 3rd party software does allow modification, the benefits of allowing unregulated software on a router outweighs the regulatory reasons for requiring a verified firmware/software stack.

1. E-waste is a growing concern, by allowing updated firmware/software helps to reduce E-waste as routers can be updated to the latest patches, standards, and other items that prevent a router from becoming obsolete and sent to the landfill even though it could be useable.

2. Device manufacturers and IP have shown they have little interest in supporting devices long term. Although they may claim they will continue to update devices, looking at the current landscape for Android shows the reality of what happens when a manufacturer is left in charge of maintaining updates. After less than a year usually the manufacturer has moved on and no longer will support the device.

3. Security is also a concern when firmware is not updated regularly by 3rd parties. Since manufacturers will abandon tech usually within the first year security patches will never be issued.

4. Regulatory issues changes would also be slow to implement. While the FCC could work with DD-wrt and other 3rd party software to implement policy changes such as a migration to unlicensed unused bandwidth or other policy changes abandoned hardware would not be able to implement any changes, and the FCC would be required to wait until a person changes devices in order to implement the change.

The proposed idea of requiring verified software does not provide a good enough benefit to mitigate the other real harms this creates. It has been shown especially in the mobile market that manufacturer's fail to update equipment and usually abandon equipment after less than a year. The proposed harms are mostly theoretical while maintaining the current policy has real world benefits that would be lost. Please do not implement this.

Although DD-Wrt and other 3rd party software does allow modification, the benefits of allowing unregulated software on a router outweighs the regulatory reasons for requiring a verified firmware/software stack.

3. Security is also a concern when firmware is not updated regularly by 3rd parties. Since manufacturers will abandon tech usually within the first year security patches will never be issued.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: David Last Name: Metcalfe Mailing Address: 307 - 709 E 39th Ave City: Vancouver Country: Canada State or Province: British Columbia ZIP/Postal Code: V5W 0A4 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: This proposal is far too broad in its reading. There are plenty of scenarios outside the likes of DD-WRT routers where an owner should be well within their rights to modify the device add they see fit. The concern of polluting the airways through RF band abuse is, in the form of this proposal, a solution looking for a problem.

This proposal is far too broad in its reading. There are plenty of scenarios outside the likes of DD-WRT routers where an owner should be well within their rights to modify the device add they see fit. The concern of polluting the airways through RF band abuse is, in the form of this proposal, a solution looking for a problem. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: James Last Name: Thomas Mailing Address: 634 E. Wlanut St. City: Hanover Country: United States State or Province: PA ZIP/Postal Code: 17331 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: Hi, I own my router and my modem. It is MINE! I will install anything I wish on it. Why? Because it is MINE! Keep your mitts out of MY property. Your salaries are paid by us. That SHOULD mean you respect our rights to freedom. In this case to to as we wish with our own property.

Hi, I own my router and my modem. It is MINE! I will install anything I wish on it. Why? Because it is MINE! Keep your mitts out of MY property. Your salaries are paid by us. That SHOULD mean you respect our rights to freedom. In this case to to as we wish with our own property. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: John Last Name: Waters Mailing Address: 6512 Melia ST City: Springfield Country: United States State or Province: VA ZIP/Postal Code: 22150 Email Address: Organization Name: Comment: FCC,

Please let us do what we want with our hardware, we purchased it, so we have the full right to put what we want on it. honestly you have no say in it, its our hardware and we can choose to put free software on our hardware.

Wireless networking research depends on the ability of researchers to investigate and modify their devices. Americans need the ability to fix security holes in their devices when the manufacturer chooses to not do so. Users have in the past fixed serious bugs in their wifi drivers, which would be banned under the NPRM. Billions of dollars of commerce, such as secure wifi vendors, retail hotspot vendors, depends on the ability of users and companies to install the software of their choosing.

FCC,

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Roy Last Name: Child Mailing Address: 3228 Bever Ave SE City: Cedar Rapids Country: United States State or Province: IA ZIP/Postal Code: 52403 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: The Federal government should not take away my right to run the software of my choosing or my creation on the hardware of my choosing.

I have a right to create or build my own hardware and software. I have the right to install the software that I want on hardware purchased from somebody else.

I understand that the FCC regulates radio transmissions, and have rules around what I am allowed to do with them. Those regulations are already in place, and already have mechanisms to enforce them.

There is no need to restrict my legal right to install firmware on my device, simply because I MIGHT cause the device to behave outside of regulated limits.

Under this same line of thinking, I should be prevented from installing the operating system of choice on my computer because I MIGHT use that operating system to illegally access another computer. I should be prevented from installing the development software of my choice because I MIGHT use that software to create a virus.

The Federal government should not take away my right to run the software of my choosing or my creation on the hardware of my choosing.

I have a right to create or build my own hardware and software. I have the right to install the software that I want on hardware purchased from somebody else.

I understand that the FCC regulates radio transmissions, and have rules around what I am allowed to do with them. Those regulations are already in place, and already have mechanisms to enforce them.

There is no need to restrict my legal right to install firmware on my device, simply because I MIGHT cause the device to behave outside of regulated limits.

Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Daina Last Name: Sutton Mailing Address: 516 Ned Collins Rd. City: East Dublin Country: United States State or Province: GA ZIP/Postal Code: 31027 Email Address: Organization Name: Comment: Public servants of the Federal Communications Commission, It is with great concern that I write you today regarding the latest proposal to restrict free use and research by private citizens of alternative wireless and computing systems.

The ability for private citizens alongside, but not in conjunction with, federally approved researchers to conduct their own research and use of any and all methods of electronic communication is paramount to the future progress of technological advancement of this very necessary field of technology.

On the subject of liberty it is not at all acceptable that, given we live in a free society, our use of technology should be dependent upon federal approval of certain manufacturer's technology nor should our separate but intersecting third party devices be limited by some arbitrarily concocted regulations. It is not within the federal government's powers or mandate to codify specific software and hardware solely on the basis that it lies outside standard mainstream consumer products. Further, information security is paramount in today's world and often alternative operating systems offer a higher degree of internal systems security not found in most popular and conventional forms of consumer products. The FCC could find itself in quite a precarious position should a large number of citizens find their data in the hands of unscrupulous individuals which could have been averted were they able to use alternative technology systems but were denied due to the FCC's own regulatory measures.

Americans must also be able to secure their own data when the companies we rely on abstain from patching their own security flaws. That the FCC would be considering a proposal which could leave private citizens at the mercy of individuals operating outside the boundaries of the law is worrisome to say the least and in the past it has often been the case that privacy gaps and security flaws in wireless hardware which transmits sensitive data has been fixed as a result of the efforts of private individuals. This and many similar actions would be banned under the NPRM.

The FCC may also run afoul of the First Amendment to the Constitution by limiting those citizens who seek to use alternative methods and hardware to transmit wireless data as a matter of political principals and the desire to express political dissent through legitimate consumption practices. The NPRM would stifle this very legitimate speech, protected under the First Amendment, and may find itself on the wrong side of Constitutional Law and Supreme Court precedent.

I hope my words have not been met by deaf ears and the Federal Communications Commission takes seriously the implications of this very dangerous precedent being set should this regulatory measure come into effect. I am confident in the FCC's ability to make the right choice by setting aside this regulatory measure and hanging it up in the "extremely bad" category of regulatory ideas. Public servants of the Federal Communications Commission, It is with great concern that I write you today regarding the latest proposal to restrict free use and research by private citizens of alternative wireless and computing systems.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Udbhav Last Name: Kamboj Mailing Address: 362 William Berczy Blvd City: Markham Country: Canada State or Province: Ontario ZIP/Postal Code: L6C0C2 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: This is an unnecessary change that does not have any reason for why its being implemented. Why do you want to prevent me from installing a Linux based OS onto my computer, just because it happens to have a Wifi card? There is no real reason for a ruling like this, and it will just decrease consumer confidence in the FCC from both Americans and those around the world that rely on American technology.

This is an unnecessary change that does not have any reason for why its being implemented. Why do you want to prevent me from installing a Linux based OS onto my computer, just because it happens to have a Wifi card? There is no real reason for a ruling like this, and it will just decrease consumer confidence in the FCC from both Americans and those around the world that rely on American technology. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Nicolas Last Name: Baez Mailing Address: 42 tavistock street City: springfield Country: United States State or Province: MA ZIP/Postal Code: 01119 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: High School of Science and Technology Comment: Laws against freedom of choice for the public shouldn't be passed because once the freedom of choice is taken away in the name of "protection", we will lose all individuality.

Laws against freedom of choice for the public shouldn't be passed because once the freedom of choice is taken away in the name of "protection", we will lose all individuality. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Jeremiah Last Name: Moore Mailing Address: 836 n 700 e City: Logan Country: United States State or Province: UT ZIP/Postal Code: 84321 Email Address: null Organization Name: null Comment: Don't take away the only avenue people like me, have to systems like Linux. The last thing that this industry needs is more manufacture say in quality.

Thanks

Don't take away the only avenue people like me, have to systems like Linux. The last thing that this industry needs is more manufacture say in quality.

Thanks Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Victor Last Name: Kim Mailing Address: 3800 geary blvd City: san francisco Country: United States State or Province: CA ZIP/Postal Code: 94118 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: null Comment: RE: FCC NPRM 'Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices'

I respectfully ask that the FCC to not implement rules that take away my ability to install the software of my choosing on my computing devices.

Wireless networking research depends on my ability to research, investigate and modify my devices.

I need the ability to fix security holes in my devices when the manufacturer chooses to not do so.

I have averted serious bugs in my wifi drivers using a combination of the three above abilities, which would be banned under the NPRM.

Greater than my own personal wants and needs billions of dollars of commerce, such as secure wifi vendors, retail hotspot vendors, depends on the ability of users and companies to install the software of their choosing over wifi or ethernet.

In my humble opinion, passing the FCC NPRM 'Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices' would be irresponsible, disruptive and counter-productive on the matter of consumer, corporate, and commercial wifi internet connectivity usage.

PLEASE RECONSIDER; PLEASE DO NOT LET THIS PASS.

RE: FCC NPRM 'Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices'

I respectfully ask that the FCC to not implement rules that take away my ability to install the software of my choosing on my computing devices.

Wireless networking research depends on my ability to research, investigate and modify my devices.

I need the ability to fix security holes in my devices when the manufacturer chooses to not do so.

I have averted serious bugs in my wifi drivers using a combination of the three above abilities, which would be banned under the NPRM. Greater than my own personal wants and needs billions of dollars of commerce, such as secure wifi vendors, retail hotspot vendors, depends on the ability of users and companies to install the software of their choosing over wifi or ethernet.

PLEASE RECONSIDER; PLEASE DO NOT LET THIS PASS. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Saul Last Name: Beck Mailing Address: 2 Clarence Street City: Dartmouth Country: United Kingdom State or Province: Devon ZIP/Postal Code: TQ6 9NW Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: Wireless networking research depends on the ability of researchers to investigate and modify their devices, in blocking this you are limiting the creativity of us. Americans need the ability to fix security holes in their devices when the manufacturer chooses to not do so. Users have in the past fixed serious bugs in their wifi drivers, which would be banned under the NPRM. Billions of dollars of commerce, such as secure wifi vendors, retail hotspot vendors, depends on the ability of users and companies to install the software of their choosing.

Wireless networking research depends on the ability of researchers to investigate and modify their devices, in blocking this you are limiting the creativity of us. Americans need the ability to fix security holes in their devices when the manufacturer chooses to not do so. Users have in the past fixed serious bugs in their wifi drivers, which would be banned under the NPRM. Billions of dollars of commerce, such as secure wifi vendors, retail hotspot vendors, depends on the ability of users and companies to install the software of their choosing. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Sean Last Name: Jinbo Mailing Address: 18275 santa fe ave City: devore heights Country: United States State or Province: CA ZIP/Postal Code: 92407 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: BECAUSE this doesn't allow the installation of linux, one of the most widely used operating systems even in the government, this would cause a lot of backlash and people will actually leave the country because of it.

BECAUSE this doesn't allow the installation of linux, one of the most widely used operating systems even in the government, this would cause a lot of backlash and people will actually leave the country because of it. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Ryan Last Name: Chenoweth Mailing Address: 7205 Lake Vista Drive Apt 104 City: Raleigh Country: United States State or Province: NC ZIP/Postal Code: 27613 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: Absolutely not. Once I have purchased a router it's mine to do with as a see fit.

And frankly, the entire EULA that companies right today is ludicrous. The concept of "Licensing" is a stupid one, and needs to go away. If I pay for something, I should own it, not "permanently rent" it.

Absolutely not. Once I have purchased a router it's mine to do with as a see fit.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Christopher Last Name: Luthy Mailing Address: 2322 Hudson Cir City: Aurora Country: United States State or Province: IL ZIP/Postal Code: 60502-7339 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: It is absolutely ridiculous that this is even being considered.

Taking away the freedom to install *ANY* software of my choosing on *ANY* hardware device that I *OWN OUTRIGHT*, is unneccesary and overly ornerous on its face.

By regulating this, simply to "confine" radios that can be partially/fully defined by software to "conforming" behaviors, you will cause more problems than you will solve.

If someone installs software that allows/causes their radios to cause interference in other devices, by all means, prosecute that *INDIVIDUAL* for violating FCC regs on interference. However, do not remove the rights from *EVERYONE ELSE* to use our devices as we see fit in order to *PREVENT* individuals from doing wrong.

Don't do this.

I say this as an individual who *IS CURRENTLY RUNNING* 3rd party software on a device that would fall under the proposed regulation. The 3rd party software took an unusable device (unusable due to poor software) and made it usable again. Do *NOT* take that ability away from us.

Again, Don't do this. It's wrong.

It is absolutely ridiculous that this is even being considered.

Taking away the freedom to install *ANY* software of my choosing on *ANY* hardware device that I *OWN OUTRIGHT*, is unneccesary and overly ornerous on its face.

By regulating this, simply to "confine" radios that can be partially/fully defined by software to "conforming" behaviors, you will cause more problems than you will solve.

Don't do this. I say this as an individual who *IS CURRENTLY RUNNING* 3rd party software on a device that would fall under the proposed regulation. The 3rd party software took an unusable device (unusable due to poor software) and made it usable again. Do *NOT* take that ability away from us.

Again, Don't do this. It's wrong. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Concerned Last Name: Citizen Mailing Address: New York City: NY Country: United States State or Province: NY ZIP/Postal Code: 10001 Email Address: Organization Name: Comment: This is the another bad idea that will never work, just like SOPA and PIPA. This will stifle innovation and create unnecessary barriers to learning. The person that put forth this proposal should be imprisoned for wasting taxpayer dollars to even take up such an absurd proposal.

This is the another bad idea that will never work, just like SOPA and PIPA. This will stifle innovation and create unnecessary barriers to learning. The person that put forth this proposal should be imprisoned for wasting taxpayer dollars to even take up such an absurd proposal. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Ardyn Last Name: Majere Mailing Address: 2616 Toy ave City: Sacramento Country: United States State or Province: CA ZIP/Postal Code: 95822 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: To whom it may concern.

I am a computer engineer, a licensed amateur radio operator (W6LVR) and an electronics hobbyist.

With that said, I have a dair bit of knowledge in this field, and I think that this move to restrict the freedom of what consumers can do with their own hardware is ludicrous.

I am employed as an operations engineer at one of the fastest growing technology companies in Europe. One of the main reasons I have this job is not because I learned the skills I use in a classroom, but because I learned then while tinkering with my computer and router.

When I was younger, I learned how to install Linux and other free operating system on my computer, which gave me nimrod skills I use at my place of employment. I also learned many valuable lessons by changing the firmware on my WiFi router to add both new features and increase security.

A wireless router is nothing more than a simple computer running a custom operating system. It needs to be updated constantly to maintain security. While some manufactures do fix security holes, many others do not. The ability to run custom firmware makes using devices that manufacturers either fail to update in a timely manner or have simply abandoned possible and safe.

Not only would being limited from adjusting my operating system have prevented me from learning the skills I am gainfully employed for, but doing so now would prevent me from doing my job without breaking the law! I need Linux on my laptop and pc for many aspects of my job, and the ability to install custom firmware laptop allows me to better secure my home office without spending needles money on an expensive commercial solution.

In short, this law will actively hurt my ability to be gainfully employed, and furthermore prevent other young people from following in my footsteps.

To whom it may concern.

I am a computer engineer, a licensed amateur radio operator (W6LVR) and an electronics hobbyist.

With that said, I have a dair bit of knowledge in this field, and I think that this move to restrict the freedom of what consumers can do with their own hardware is ludicrous. I am employed as an operations engineer at one of the fastest growing technology companies in Europe. One of the main reasons I have this job is not because I learned the skills I use in a classroom, but because I learned then while tinkering with my computer and router.

In short, this law will actively hurt my ability to be gainfully employed, and furthermore prevent other young people from following in my footsteps. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Craig Last Name: Allen Mailing Address: 141 Davies Ave City: Dumont Country: United States State or Province: NJ ZIP/Postal Code: 07628 Email Address: Organization Name: Comment: This rule will shut down an entire technology business sector that has been responsible for many computer advancements: the open source community. These developers need access to modify tech with rf support to develop software and tools used throughout the world and must modify their computers to install this software.

This rule will shut down an entire technology business sector that has been responsible for many computer advancements: the open source community. These developers need access to modify tech with rf support to develop software and tools used throughout the world and must modify their computers to install this software. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Zachariah Last Name: Ercolano Mailing Address: 4743 19th Ave NE City: Seattle Country: United States State or Province: WA ZIP/Postal Code: 98105 Email Address: Organization Name: Comment: Dear FCC,

Stop being preposterous.

While you were created with the power to regulate, you have been abusing that power for far too long.

The freedom to modify the things we buy has always been an American freedom.

The world may be heading toward a dystopian future, but you seem hellbent on driving the bus.

If any regulation decreases the freedom of The People, you should probably not go forward with it.

Let the people remain to be free, get your noses out of our devices.

Dear FCC,

Stop being preposterous.

While you were created with the power to regulate, you have been abusing that power for far too long.

The freedom to modify the things we buy has always been an American freedom.

The world may be heading toward a dystopian future, but you seem hellbent on driving the bus.

If any regulation decreases the freedom of The People, you should probably not go forward with it.

Let the people remain to be free, get your noses out of our devices. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Eric Last Name: Boothe Mailing Address: 2928 Matt Dr City: Eugene Country: United States State or Province: UT ZIP/Postal Code: 97408 Email Address: Organization Name: Comment: Respected FCC Commission:

A big part of this tinkering hobby has been going outside of what I am given with the equipment I purchase to expand functionality and cater it to my tastes and uses. I have a Windows PC at home with a purchased copy of Mac OSX running alongside in order to do audio editing, but be able to play Windows games in my free time.

I have an Android tablet whose manufacturer has not released any security updates in years, so I have used community firmware to patch against basic security threats while maintaining updates Android versions. I have a laptop that I purchased overseas and I cannot activate Windows, so I ditched Windows and installed Linux to use at school.

I have a wireless router that I had to install custom firmware to in order to comply with FCC frequency rules (the router I purchased was overseas as well). Without custom firmware, the manufacturer didn't support US frequencies and FCC compliance. Custom firmware allowed me to comply with current law that the manufacturer would not support.

My use cases are evidence of legitimate uses that bring me in compliance with the law, allow me to use free and open software, and keep US copyright law. Manufacturers make money on hardware, and their incentive to provide ongoing upkeep and support for their firmware and operating systems is bleak. There is a community that supports one another. This community keeps our networks more secure, finds bugs, fixes them, and provides their sources free and openly to the community. We support each other, and it sustains innovation and functionality to a degree higher than the original manufacturers.

Please help keep it this way, and remember the people. Help me keep obeying the law and help me build the community that innovated all of this technology in the first place.

Respected FCC Commission:

I am a venture capitalist, an innovator, a student, and a soon-to-be attorney. On the side, and since I can remember, I have been an avid tinkerer and technologist. I think you'll find my use cases interesting as they have brought me closer to compliance with the law than the original intentions of manufacturers. A big part of this tinkering hobby has been going outside of what I am given with the equipment I purchase to expand functionality and cater it to my tastes and uses. I have a Windows PC at home with a purchased copy of Mac OSX running alongside in order to do audio editing, but be able to play Windows games in my free time.

Please help keep it this way, and remember the people. Help me keep obeying the law and help me build the community that innovated all of this technology in the first place. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Carl Last Name: Watkins Mailing Address: 321 Muskingum Dr City: Marietta Country: United States State or Province: OH ZIP/Postal Code: 45750 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: null Comment: I do not support the proposed changes to wi-fi regulation. I appreciate the FCC's desire to secure frequencies, but the vague language of this proposed rule leaves far too much room for debate.

Not to mention the concept of this restriction is flawed and nearly unenforceable. It's potentially taking away the ability to modify the software of a privately owned router seems like a gross overstep which prevents people from making sure their hardware remains secure even when the manufacturer discontinues firmware updates.

I do not support the proposed changes to wi-fi regulation. I appreciate the FCC's desire to secure frequencies, but the vague language of this proposed rule leaves far too much room for debate.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Michael Last Name: Bonham Mailing Address: 27 broad street City: San francisco Country: United States State or Province: CA ZIP/Postal Code: 94112 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: null Comment: I recently bought a high end wifi n and a/c router for my home. Out of the box it performed well. However, by loading an open source firmware onto the router (Linux based) there are a huge set of new features I'm using. This open source firmware adds real value to the router that I purchased and own. I understand that the new firmware may void my warranty and I am ok with that.

Additionally, consumers should be allowed to run any software they wish on electronics and hardware that they own. This is key. IF I OWN SOMETHING, I AM NOT INTERESTED IN ANYONE DICTATING HOW I MAY OR MAY NOT USE MY OWN PROPERTY.

I recently bought a high end wifi n and a/c router for my home. Out of the box it performed well. However, by loading an open source firmware onto the router (Linux based) there are a huge set of new features I'm using. This open source firmware adds real value to the router that I purchased and own. I understand that the new firmware may void my warranty and I am ok with that.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Scott Last Name: Hohauser Mailing Address: 5512 fort hamilton pkwy City: brooklyn Country: United States State or Province: NY ZIP/Postal Code: 11219 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: Public servants of the Federal Communications Commission,

It is with great concern that I write you today regarding the latest proposal to restrict free use and research by private citizens of alternative wireless and computing systems.

Public servants of the Federal Communications Commission,

It is with great concern that I write you today regarding the latest proposal to restrict free use and research by private citizens of alternative wireless and computing systems.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Christopher Last Name: Kessinger Mailing Address: 33 E Trillium Cir City: The Woodlands Country: United States State or Province: TX ZIP/Postal Code: 77381 Email Address: Organization Name: Comment: First off, who are you to tell me what I can and can't install on my own devices?

Second off, this will seriously hamper the security researchers' abilities to find security flaws. It will also mean that, if a vulnerability is found that the manufacturer doesn't feel like fixing, the users won't be able to take it into their own hands.

It is a terrible idea on every level.

First off, who are you to tell me what I can and can't install on my own devices?

It is a terrible idea on every level. Please Do Not Reply To This Email.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: Christopher Last Name: Garner Mailing Address: 4113 Suwanee Drive City: LaGrange Country: United States State or Province: KY ZIP/Postal Code: 40031 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: Public servants of the Federal Communications Commission,

It is with great concern that I write you today regarding the latest proposal to restrict free use and research by private citizens of alternative wireless and computing systems.

Public servants of the Federal Communications Commission,

It is with great concern that I write you today regarding the latest proposal to restrict free use and research by private citizens of alternative wireless and computing systems.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: David Last Name: Bobo Mailing Address: 4718 s 700 east #35 City: Murray Country: United States State or Province: UT ZIP/Postal Code: 84107 Email Address: Organization Name: Comment: Public servants of the Federal Communications Commission,

It is with great concern that I write you today regarding the latest proposal to restrict free use and research by private citizens of alternative wireless and computing systems.

Public servants of the Federal Communications Commission,

It is with great concern that I write you today regarding the latest proposal to restrict free use and research by private citizens of alternative wireless and computing systems.

Public Comments on Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices:======

Title: Equipment Authorization and Electronic Labeling for Wireless Devices FR Document Number: 2015-18402 RIN: Publish Date: 8/6/2015 12:00:00 AM

Submitter Info: First Name: jake Last Name: sternberg Mailing Address: 2429 adeline st City: oakland Country: United States State or Province: CA ZIP/Postal Code: 94607-2424 Email Address: [email protected] Organization Name: Comment: The F.C.C. must not risk its reputation and authority by attempting to regulate general-purpose computers.

As much as the F.C.C. wants to prevent unauthorized use of frequencies by physical restriction of hardware, it's no longer possible in a free society.

The path proposed by the F.C.C. is doomed for so many reasons. The only enforcement possible will be harmful to American business interests, since only American businesses will actually comply - and compliance by any company will make hacking their products like shooting fish in a barrel.

If the F.C.C. thinks the Drug War is a raging success, wait until they try regulating general purpose computers. Please do not go down this road.

The F.C.C. must not risk its reputation and authority by attempting to regulate general-purpose computers.

As much as the F.C.C. wants to prevent unauthorized use of frequencies by physical restriction of hardware, it's no longer possible in a free society.

If the F.C.C. thinks the Drug War is a raging success, wait until they try regulating general purpose computers. Please do not go down this road.