DOCSLIB.ORG

A Bone to Pick: Interview with Paul Halstead

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Bone to Pick: Interview with Paul Halstead A Bone to Pick: Interview with Paul Halstead Back in the old days, when we had to ride our bikes to site.... In the trenches with Moshe Dayan Robin Dennell vs the KGB Undergraduate studies at Cambridge and the death of David Clarke Peter, Paul & Glynis (et al.) (a Greek Peter, Paul & Mary) The 'coggie' playgroup The naked truth about Mike (and other aspects of friendship at Cambridge) The processualist/post- processualist controversy The future of archaeology Paul's PhD research Working at Sheffield Last orders, last words The interlocutors were Michael Lane (MFL), Paul Halstead (PH), Mel Giles (MCG), and John Barrett (JCB). Back in the old days, when we had to ride our bikes to site.... MFL: This started as a sequel to the interview with Mike Parker Pearson in issue 2 of assemblage. Your name and Glynis's name came up many times -- in the best of contexts -- in that interview. So we thought we'd ask you for your side of the many stories that he told, and also to share with us some of your experiences as an archaeologist and an intellectual, and as a former postgraduate student. I suppose we could start with some general background: I don't have any idea where you grew up, where you went to school, and when you first decided to become an archaeologist. PH: Until I was about ten, I moved around quite a lot, because my parents moved around. All of my secondary-school education was around Birmingham. How I got into archaeology was that at school I did Classics -- Latin and ancient Gr eek -- I got through Homer, got very interested in Greek Bronze Age archaeology, and because of that, I wanted to go and dig in Greece. When I finished at school, I wrote off to various digs in Greece, but no one would take me; they said I needed experience, which would be a very laudable thing to do. Because of that, I started digging in Britain. So I took a year off between school and university and spent most of that period digging on mostly Roman and medieval sites around England. MCG: Did you work on any of the big urban digs at all? What were you working on? Were they smaller sites, rural sites? PH: It's so long ago, I can barely remember. The first dig I went on was the Roman fort at Wall [Staffordshire], on the A5. MFL: That was my next question. PH: I used to cycle there every Saturday. It was being dug by a group of amateurs -- which was brilliant. We used to trowel away the whole day and find one little piece of pottery, which in retrospect seems rather unproductive. MFL: By amateurs, do you mean a local society? PH: Yeah, a local society. They were good. I think one of the things that has remained with me since then is that, although the academic goals of what they were doing may not have been that well thought out, the care that they took over excavation is something that I have very rarely seen. They were professional archaeologists. But I dug in Birmingham, in one of the forts -- under one of the university car parks, as it is now. Urban archaeology? I dug in Gloucester -- it's supposed to be the Roman town of Glevum -- a long, long time ago, before I went to university. MFL: How was local archaeology conducted back then, compared to how it's done now with all the heritage management laws in place? PH: I'm not sure I took that much interest at the time in the structure of what was going on, but the big difference from now is that there were loads of excavations going on every summer. It was very easy to get excavation experience. People advertised for so many volunteers, and they paid you a very small sum which would cover your food. And you slept on the floor in your sleeping bag or camp bed. It was great because it was very easy to get lots of experience, and I think that it's much, much harder now. MCG: I think that's the big change with some local society excavation, which tends to be almost on the back of some other projects, semi- liaison with university, or museum experience. There's not that private individual's urge to get a site and work on it for years and years. It just isn't allowed to go on any more. PH: Some of the things I worked on were rescue digs like the things Trevor Rowley ran on the new car park at Birmingham University. MFL: What exactly was that? PH: It was a Roman fort -- eventually. We trowelled around a ditch for a couple of summers. MFL: Can you remember what your first dig experience was like? Were you immediately impressed with field work? PH: Oh, I loved it, actually, yes! I really liked trowelling and trying to find features and things like that. It was really different from school education, which is entirely book-based, and then suddenly you're exposed to a lifestyle that is largely outdoors. I thought it was brilliant. That's why I went on to do archaeology, because I had a place to go do Classics at Cambridge, and after spending year digging, I had this vision of sitting in the library in front of the lexicon for three years. It seemed an awful idea. I went to my tutor who'd been responsible for Classics, which was what I was going in to, and explained this doubt about doing Classics. So he said to me, 'Well, what do you really like in Classics?' and I said, 'Homer'. And he said, 'What have you read?' I said, 'The Iliad and The Odyssey'. He said, 'There's not actually anything else!' Although that's obviously true, it hadn't actually struck me quite with that clarity before, and at that point I just decided to switch. My plan had been to do Classics and do Classical Archaeology back to back. You could not do very much of it. So at that point, I decided I was going to switch and do archaeology. MFL: Your degree at Cambridge was in what exactly? PH: It was called Archaeology and Anthropology, which meant that in the first year you did social anthropology, physical anthropology, and archaeology. Then, at the end of the first year, you chose, and I chose to do archaeology. You chose -- so you were 'streamed' by periods. You could do Palaeolithic, Neolithic, Bronze Age, Iron Age -- you could do Anglo-Saxon and something else I don't remember. I decided to do Neolithic, Bronze Age, and Iron Age. MFL: When was this? PH: I went there in 1970. MFL: Which college did you attend at Cambridge? PH: Magdalen, which was a curious choice. I went to a school which sent quite a lot of people to 'Ox-bridge'. It worked on the basis that those of us who were doing Classics -- they just sort of spread us around -- and I don't know why I was sent to Magdalen. It was a very, very curious college in those days. It mainly took public school boys; there were hundreds of Harrovians, Etonians, Marlburians, and people from Rugby, whatever they're called, many of whom would simply not get into a reputable university, and they ended up there. It was a really rude shock for the first few days to find yourself surrounded by people who had their own packs of hounds. I didn't even know people like that existed. MCG: Did you enjoy it, or did you find it difficult? PH: At first, I found the atmosphere at Magdalen thoroughly oppressive; it was a sort of society I was completely unused to. When I went to the dinner for all the new students, I was one of only two who wasn't wearing a dinner jacket. I'd never owned a dinner jacket. I'd seen one once before in my life. Absolute shock. MFL: Was there still much ceremony in everything at Cambridge at that time? PH: Oh, yes. Certainly Magdalen was famous for the fact that the hall where formal dinner happened didn't have any electricity. It was all candlelit. It was an oppressive place to be. MFL: How did you adjust? PH: Well, basically, I adjusted at first because I had lots of friends from school at other colleges, and I simply ignored all of this, but eventually I found people in the same position as me. There were actually a lot of us, but because we were less obvious than the upper-class twits with their packs of hounds, we didn't immediately recognise or identify these people. Gradually, we got to meet each other, and then it became much more friendly. And in fact, in the end, I think it was a very salutary experience, because the lesson it taught me was that the snobbery works two ways. My reaction to these public-school boys was simply that I didn't want to know. I treated them all with equal loathing, and in fact, many of them were very nice. I think by my third year I actually began to realise that, in a curious way, snobbery works in both directions. As well as people like me being looked down upon by my peers, I was very unfairly ostracising a lot of them. Amongst them were some very nice people, some of whom were actually, in an interesting way, victims of that system, in the sense that they had been pushed into educational situations they couldn't cope with.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Wisbech Standard 26/06/11 Fenland District Archaeological
    The Wisbech Standard 26/06/11 Fenland District Archaeological Planning - A Response to Councillor Melton We the undersigned consider to be shocking and potentially disastrous the recent declaration by Councillor Alan Melton (reported in the Cambs Times and Wisbech Standard) that, as of July 1st, the Fenland District Council will no longer apply archaeological planning condition. His speech to the Fenland Council Building and Design Awards ceremony at Wisbech noted the safeguarding of natural and aesthetic concerns, but made no mention of heritage aside from: “in local known historical areas, such as next to a 1000 year old church…. Common sense will prevail! The bunny huggers won't like this, but if they wish to inspect a site, they can do it when the footings are being dug out”. If Fenland District Council proceed with these plans, not only will it find itself contravening national planning guidelines and existing cultural and heritage statute and case law, it is likely any development will be open to legal challenges that will involve the Council (and by extension its rate-payers) in major financial costs and cause prospective developers serious delays, if not worse. All these factors run counter to Councillor Melton’s arguments and he will place Fenland District Council at a considerable financial risk. Rather than, as claimed, being an impediment to local development, development-related archaeology is a highly professional field and the vast majority of such excavations within England occur without any delay or redesign consequences to subsequent building programmes. Indeed, not only is archaeological fieldwork a source of graduate employment, but also now significantly contributes to the local rural economy (plant hire, tourism etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Emeritus Professor Warwick Bray
    III. Oral history – Emeritus Professor Warwick Bray ‘The Life and Times of Uncle Warwick’ Helen R. Haines, PhD. Trent University Archaeology Research Centre Recently, I had the privilege of hosting a session in honour of Dr. Warwick Bray at the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The following is a forward to Pamela J. Smith’s interview which introduces the reader to this wonderfully modest and endearingly understated man. His modest nature is exemplified in the title for my introduction which comes from a letter Warwick sent me in response to my request for his curriculum vitae – a document he humourously paralleled to children’s book ‘The Life and Times of Uncle Wiggley’. If you were to meet Warwick it is highly unlikely that you would at first, or even second or third glance, realise his great intellect or the lasting contributions he has made to our discipline. Upon meeting Warwick the first thing many people notice is the wry smile, twinkle in his eye, and penchant for gently poking fun at both himself and pompous or overly serious colleagues and as a means of relieving nervous and uptight students. His sense of humour is more than a means of creating levity, it is a long standing belief of his that we take ourselves (archaeologists) too seriously, and we need to find more appealing ways of engaging and educating the public about the past. Warwick’s desire to eschew technological jargon in favour of ‘clear language’ makes his papers a delight to read by students and colleagues as well as by the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Figurines, Fertility, and the Emergence of Complex Society in Prehistoric Cyprus Author(S): Diane Bolger Source: Current Anthropology, Vol
    Figurines, Fertility, and the Emergence of Complex Society in Prehistoric Cyprus Author(s): Diane Bolger Source: Current Anthropology, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Apr., 1996), pp. 365-373 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744358 . Accessed: 09/09/2011 14:22 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Current Anthropology. http://www.jstor.org Volume 37, Number 2, April I996 365 Paleolithicevidence (Fifty-fourth James Arthur Lecture on POPE, GEOFFREY G. I989. Bambooand humanevolution. Natu- "The Evolutionof theHuman Brain,"1984). New York:Amer- ral History,October, pp. 48-56. ican Museum ofNatural History. SHEA, JOHN J. I988. Spearpoints from the MiddlePaleolithic of . I988a. "The species-specificevolution and contextsof the Levant.Journal of Field Archaeology I5:44I-50. the creativemind: Thinking in time,"in The creativemind: . I989a. "A functionalstudy of the lithicindustries associ- Towardsan evolutionarytheory of discovery and innovation. ated withhominid fossils in the Kebaraand QafzehCaves, Is- Editedby E.
    [Show full text]
  • Deepening Histories and the Deep Past
    12. Lives and Lines Integrating molecular genetics, the ‘origins of modern humans’ and Indigenous knowledge Martin Porr Introduction Within Palaeolithic archaeology and palaeoanthropology a general consensus seems to have formed over the last decades that modern humans – people like us – originated in Africa around 150,000 to 200,000 years ago and subsequently migrated into the remaining parts of the Old and New World to reach Australia by about 50,000 years ago and Patagonia by about 13,000 years ago.1 This view is encapsulated in describing Africa as ‘the cradle of humankind’. This usually refers to the origins of the genus Homo between two and three million years ago, but it is readily extended to the processes leading to the origins of our species Homo sapiens sapiens.2 A narrative is created that consequently imagines the repeated origins of species of human beings in Sub-Saharan Africa and their subsequent colonisation of different parts of the world. In the course of these conquests other human species are replaced, such as the Neanderthals in western and central Eurasia.3 These processes are described with the terms ‘Out-of-Africa I’ (connected to Homo ergaster/erectus around two million years ago) and ‘Out-of-Africa II’ (connected to Homo sapiens sapiens about 100,000 years ago). It is probably fair to say that this description relates to the most widely accepted view of ‘human origins’ both in academia as well as the public sphere.4 Analysis of ancient DNA, historical DNA samples and samples from living human populations molecular genetics increasingly contributes to our understanding of the deep past and generally, and seems to support this ‘standard model of human origins’, beginning with the establishment of the mitochondrial ‘Eve’ hypothesis from the 1980s onwards.5 In 2011 an Australian Indigenous genome was for the first time analysed – a 100-year-old hair sample from the Western Australian 1 Oppenheimer 2004, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Biomolecular Approach to 'Unidentifiable' Bone Fragments
    This is a repository copy of Finding Britain's last hunter-gatherers : A new biomolecular approach to ‘unidentifiable’ bone fragments utilising bone collagen. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/103636/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Charlton, Sophy Jessica Laura, Alexander, Michelle Marie orcid.org/0000-0001-8000- 3639, Collins, Matthew James orcid.org/0000-0003-4226-5501 et al. (5 more authors) (2016) Finding Britain's last hunter-gatherers : A new biomolecular approach to ‘unidentifiable’ bone fragments utilising bone collagen. Journal of archaeological science. pp. 55-61. ISSN 0305-4403 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2016.07.014 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 Finding Britain’s last hunter-gatherers: A new biomolecular 2 approach to ‘unidentifiable’ bone fragments utilising bone 3 collagen 4 5 Sophy Charlton1, Michelle Alexander1, Matthew Collins1,
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Evidence of Cultural Occupation of the Most Northerly Point in Ireland: Focus on Contemporary Irish Archaeology
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1981 In Search of Evidence of Cultural Occupation of the Most Northerly Point in Ireland: Focus on Contemporary Irish Archaeology Walter Smithe Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Smithe, Walter, "In Search of Evidence of Cultural Occupation of the Most Northerly Point in Ireland: Focus on Contemporary Irish Archaeology" (1981). Master's Theses. 3224. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/3224 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1981 Walter Smithe IN SEARCH OF EVIDENCE OF CULTURAL OCCUPATION OF THE MOST NORTHERLY POINT IN IRELAND: FOCUS ON CONTEMPORARY IRISH ARCHAEOLOGY by Walter Smithe A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts May 1981 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS While submission of a thesis is a singular event, a multitude of activities must precede submission. My determination to success­ fully complete my studies was always strengthened by my best friend and wife, Flo Flynn Smithe. Her understanding, patience and animated assistance helps me reach the academic goals to which I aspire. Undertaking each new course at Loyola was not without some apprehensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory and Practice in Archaeology
    THEORY AND PRACTICE IN ARCHAEOLOGY This book aims to show through a series of examples that an interpretive archaeology dealing with past meanings can be applied in practice to archaeological data, and that it can also contribute effectively to social practice in the world of today. Seven of the nineteen contributions included have been specifically written for this volume to act as an overview of the way archaeology has developed over the last ten years. Yet Ian Hodder goes beyond this: he aims to break down the separation of theory and practice and to reconcile the division between the intellectual and the ‘dirt’ archaeologist. Faced with public controversy over the ownership and interpretation of the past, archaeology needs a clear image of itself, be able to gain funding, win public confidence and manage the heritage professionally and sensitively. Hodder asserts that archaeologists cannot afford to ignore general theory in favour of practice any more than they can afford an ivory-tower approach. Theoretical debate is important to any discipline, particularly in archaeology, if it is not to become complacent, self-interested and uncritical Theory and Practice in Archaeology captures and extends the lively debate of the 1980s over symbolic and structural approaches to archaeology. It will be essential reading for students of archaeology and for those involved in, and responsible for, heritage management. Ian Hodder is a Reader in Archaeology at the University of Cambridge, a Fellow of Darwin College and a Director of the Cambridge
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Mike Parker Pearson Interview Conducted by Thomas J
    PIA Volume 21 (2011), 39-47 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pia.401 Interview with Mike Parker Pearson Interview conducted by Thomas J. T. Williams and Hana Koriech, 12th November 2011 Mike Parker Pearson is the Insti- tute of Archaeology’s newly appointed Professor of British Later Prehistory. In this interview he reflects on his experience at the birth of post-processualism, current problems and opportu- nities in modern archaeology, and the subject for which he is best known: Stonehenge. PIA: After 22 years at Sheffield Univer- and wondering what they were. At that point sity, what made you leave? my parents were living in Oxfordshire near the Uffington White Horse so I was always MPP: I wasn’t going to leave at all, but Steve looking at the earthworks,,walking about up (Stephen Shennan, IoA Director) was very there … after that, I took every opportunity persistent! that there was. Another of the key moments PIA: What are your first impressions? in my past was the very first time I went on an excavation – not just turning up for the MPP: I’m loving it here! It’s an area of Lon- day but camping and realising this was the don I’ve known for years because of course best fun that could be had. I used to work in London in the ‘80s anyway so in a way it’s coming back to old haunts. PIA: What excavation was that? I’ve got a lot of friends here who I’ve known MPP: It was a small Roman site in Somerset for a very long time.
    [Show full text]
  • Colin Renfrew Personal Histories, Monday, 23Rd October 2006
    Colin Renfrew Personal Histories, Monday, 23rd October 2006 Audio-to-text transcription Personal Histories 2006 with Colin Renfrew, Mike Schiffer, Ezra Zubrow, recounting their memories of the 1960s “New Archaeology”. Graeme Barker was Chair. Robin Dennell, Rob Foley, Paul Mellars & Marek Zvelebil were discussants. Biffen Lecture Theatre University of Cambridge 4pm to 6.10pm Speaker in this segment: Professor Lord Renfrew Equipment: Edirol 24 bit WAVE/MP3 Recorder Queries should be directed to Pamela Jane Smith, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge,Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3ER Transcriptionist: Pamela Jane Smith ([email protected]) Laughter and applause are noted. Colin Renfrew, 23rd October 2006 {Time 6:22] I think best on my feet so I stand to my feet, if you will allow me, and move to the podium. If we are talking about Lewis Binford we have to remember that Louis Binford’s background was in the American South and he had a wonderful Evangelical style. [audience laughter] Now, Pamela Jane Smith has said to each of us, certainly said to me, it is very important to be personal. I think she met to be personal about oneself although I may be personal about one or two others [audience laughter] in my remarks. She suggested that it might be appropriate … first of all I’m sure I mustn’t talk for more than 15 minutes. Graeme Barker. 5 to 10 minutes Colin Renfrew TEN! Well that’s 5 minutes gone already . [audience laughter] . half the time should be for personal reflections and then time for more general reflections.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN WYMER Copyright © British Academy 2007 – All Rights Reserved
    JOHN WYMER Jim Rose Copyright © British Academy 2007 – all rights reserved John James Wymer 1928–2006 ON A WET JUNE DAY IN 1997 a party of archaeologists met at the Swan in the small Suffolk village of Hoxne to celebrate a short letter that changed the way we understand our origins. Two hundred years before, the Suffolk landowner John Frere had written to the Society of Antiquaries of London about flint ‘weapons’ that had been dug up in the local brickyard. He noted the depth of the strata in which they lay alongside the bones of unknown animals of enormous size. He concluded with great prescience that ‘the situation in which these weapons were found may tempt us to refer them to a very remote period indeed; even beyond that of the present world’.1 Frere’s letter is now recognised as the starting point for Palaeolithic, old stone age, archaeology. In two short pages he identified stone tools as objects of curiosity in their own right. But he also reasoned that because of their geological position they were ‘fabricated and used by a people who had not the use of metals’.2 The bi-centenary gathering was organised by John Wymer who devoted his professional life to the study of the Palaeolithic and whose importance to the subject extended far beyond a brickpit in Suffolk. Wymer was the greatest field naturalist of the Palaeolithic. He had acute gifts of observation and an attention to detail for both artefacts and geol- ogy that was unsurpassed. He provided a typology and a chronology for the earliest artefacts of Britain and used these same skills to establish 1 R.
    [Show full text]
  • Neanderthals and the Modern Human Colonization of Europe
    review article Neanderthals and the modern human colonization of Europe Paul Mellars Department of Archaeology, Cambridge University, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DZ, UK ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... The fate of the Neanderthal populations of Europe and western Asia has gripped the popular and scientific imaginations for the past century. Following at least 200,000 years of successful adaptation to the glacial climates of northwestern Eurasia, they disappeared abruptly between 30,000 and 40,000 years ago, to be replaced by populations all but identical to modern humans. Recent research suggests that the roots of this dramatic population replacement can be traced far back to events on another continent, with the appearance of distinctively modern human remains and artefacts in eastern and southern Africa. he most significant contributions to these issues over an entirely separate biological species from modern humans is at the past decade have come from detailed studies of present more controversial1,2. the DNA structure of present-day human populations in different areas of the world, combined with the The archaeological record gradually accumulating recovery of residual traces of One important issue in current research is exactly what patterns of T‘ancient’ DNA extracted from a number of Neanderthal and early culture and technology were associated
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae - Ian Hodder
    CURRICULUM VITAE - IAN HODDER Date of Birth: 23rd November 1948 Nationality: British Career Details 1968-71 B.A. degree in Prehistoric Archaeology at the Institute of Archaeology, London University. Received First Class Honours Degree. 1971-75 Research leading to Ph.D. at Cambridge University, on the subject of ‘spatial analysis in archaeology'. 1974-77 Lecturer in the Department of Archaeology, University of Leeds. 1977-99 University Assistant Lecturer, University Lecturer (1981), Reader in Prehistory (1990), Professor of Archaeology (1996 - 9) in the Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge. 1999- Professor of Anthropology, Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, and Co-Director and Director of the Archaeology Center (to 2009). Dunlevie Family Professor in the School of Humanities and Sciences (2002-) Other Appointments and Fellowships 1984 - 1989 Adjunct Assistant Professor of Anthropology at State University of New York, Binghamton. 1986 - 1994 Adjunct Professor and Visiting Professor, Department of Anthropology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 1980 (6 months) Visiting Professor, Van Giffen Institute for Pre- and Proto-history, Amsterdam. 1985 (6 months) Visiting Professor, University of Paris I -Sorbonne (U.E.R. d'Art et d'Archéologie). 1987(6 months) Fellow at Centre for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, California. 1990 - 2001 Fellow of Darwin College, Cambridge. 1996 - Fellow of the British Academy. 1 2005 – 2006 Guggenheim Fellow. 2007 - Honorary Professor, Institute of Archaeology, University College, London. 2009 (3 months) Visiting Fellow, Magdalen College, Oxford. 2010 (3 months) Visiting Professor, Maison des Sciences de l’Homme and Associate Professor at University of Paris I –Sorbonne. 2010 (6 months) Senior Residential Fellow in Research Center for Anatolian Civilization, Koç University, Istanbul.
    [Show full text]