DOCSLIB.ORG

Committee Matrices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Committee Matrices Committee Matrices Please note, *(O) next to any Country’s name marks the Observer status in that Committee. 1. UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME 1. Afghanistan 41. Germany 81. Russia 2. Algeria 42. Ghana 82. Rwanda 3. Angola 43. Greece 83. Mongolia 4. Argentina 44. Guinea-Bissau 84. Montenegro 5. Australia 45. Haiti 85. Morocco 6. Austria 46. Honduras 86. Namibia 7. Azerbaijan 47. Hungary 87. Nepal 8. Bahrain 48. Iceland 88. Netherland 9. Bangladesh 49. India 89. New Zealand 10. Belarus 50. Indonesia 90. Nicaragua 11. Belgium 51. Iran 91. Nigeria 12. Bosnia and Herzegovina 52. Iraq 92. Saudi Arabia 13. Botswana 53. Ireland 93. Senegal 14. Brazil 54. Israel 94. Sweden 15. Bulgaria 55. Italy 95. Switzerland 16. Burkina Faso 56. Japan 96. Syria 17. Cambodia 57. Jordan 97. Sierra Leone 18. Canada 58. Kazakhstan 98. Singapore 19. Central African Republic 59. Kenya 99. Somalia 20. Chile 60. Kuwait 100. South Africa 21. China 61. Kyrgyzstan 101. South Sudan 22. Costa Rica 62. Latvia 102. Spain 23. Côte d’Ivoire 63. Lebanon 103. Sri Lanka 1 of 10 24. Croatia 64. Liberia 104. Tajikistan 25. Cuba 65. Libya 105. Thailand 26. Czech Republic 66. Luxembourg 106. Togo 27. Democratic Republic of Congo 67. Macedonia 107. Tunisia 28. Democratic Republic of Korea 68. Malaysia 108. Turkey 29. Denmark 69. Maldives 109. Turkmenistan 30. Djibouti 70. Mauritius 110. Ukraine 31. Dominican Republic 71. Mexico 111. United Arab Emirates 32. Egypt 72. Pakistan 112. Uganda 33. El Salvador 73. Oman 113. United Kingdom 34. Eritrea 74. Panama 114. Uruguay 35. Ethiopia 75. Philippines 115. Uzbekistan 36. Fiji 76. Poland 116. Venezuela 37. Finland 77. Portugal 117. Vietnam 38. France 78. Qatar 118. Yemen 39. Gambia 79. Republic of Korea 119. Zambia 40. Georgia 80. Romania 120. Zimbabwe 2 of 10 2. UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY (PLENARY) 1. Afghanistan 41. Honduras 81. Portugal 2. Algeria 42. Hungary 82. Qatar 3. Angola 43. Iceland 83. Republic of Korea 4. Argentina 44. India 84. Republic of Moldova 5. Armenia 45. Indonesia 85. Romania 6. Australia 46. Iran 86. Russian Federation 7. Austria 47. Iraq 87. Rwanda 8. Bangladesh 48. Ireland 88. Saudi Arabia 9. Belarus 49. Israel 89. Senegal 10. Belgium 50. Italy 90. Serbia 11. Bosnia and Herzegovina 51. Japan 91. Sierra Leone 12. Botswana 52. Jordan 92. Singapore 13. Brazil 53. Kazakhstan 93. Slovakia 14. Bulgaria 54. Kenya 94. Somalia 15. Burkina Faso 55. Kuwait 95. South Africa 16. Cameroon 56. Kyrgyzstan 96. South Sudan 17. Canada 57. Liberia 97. Spain 18. Central African Republic 58. Libya 98. Sri Lanka 19. Chile 59. Lithuania 99. Sudan 20. China 60. Luxembourg 100. Sweden 21. Colombia 61. Madagascar 101. Switzerland 22. Congo 62. Malawi 102. Syrian Arab Republic 23. Costa Rica 63. Malaysia 103. Tajikistan 24. Croatia 64. Mexico 104. Thailand 25. Cuba 65. Monaco 105. Trinidad and Tobago 26. Czech Republic 66. Mongolia 106. Tunisia 3 of 10 27. Democratic People's 67. 107. Republic of Korea Morocco Turkey 28. Democratic Republic of the 68. 108. Congo Mozambique Turkmenistan 29. Denmark 69. Myanmar 109. Tuvalu 30. Ecuador 70. Namibia 110. Uganda 31. Egypt 71. Netherlands 111. Ukraine 32. Ethiopia 72. New Zealand 112. United Arab Emirates 33. Fiji 73. Nicaragua 113. United Kingdom 34. Finland 74. 114. United States of Niger America 35. France 75. Nigeria 115. Uruguay 36. Gabon 76. Norway 116. Uzbekistan 37. Germany 77. 117. Bolivarian Republic of Oman Venezuela 38. Guatemala 78. Pakistan 118. Vietnam 39. Guinea 79. Philippines 119. Zambia 40. Haiti 80. Poland 120. Zimbabwe 4 of 10 3. UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL (DOUBLE DELEGATION) 1. Afghanistan 26. Iraq 2. Angola 27. Italy 3. Argentina 28. Japan 4. Australia 29. Mexico 5. Austria 30. Nepal 6. Bahamas 31. Nigeria 7. Bahrain 32. Pakistan 8. Bangladesh 33. Peru 9. Brazil 34. Philippines 10. Bulgaria 35. Qatar 11. Burkina Faso 36. Rwanda 12. Cameroon 37. Saudi Arabia 13. Chile 38. Senegal 14. China 39. Slovakia 15. Croatia 40. Somalia 16. Cuba 41. South Africa 17. Czechia 42. Spain 18. Democratic Republic of the Congo 43. Togo 19. Denmark 44. Tunisia 20. Egypt 45. Ukraine 21. Eritrea 46. United Kingdom 22. Fiji 47. Uruguay 23. Hungary 48. Myanmar(O) 24. Iceland 49. United States of America(O) 25. India 50. Human Rights Watch(O) Please note, *(O) next to any Country’s name marks the Observer status in that Committee. 5 of 10 4. INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY 1. Afghanistan 28. Iraq 55. Russia 2. Algeria 29. Israel 56. Rwanda 3. Argentina 30. Japan 57. Saudi Arabia 4. Armenia 31. Jordan 58. Serbia 5. Bangladesh 32. Kazakhstan 59. Singapore 6. Belarus 33. Kenya 60. Slovakia 7. Belgium 34. Korea, Republic of 61. Slovenia 8. Bolivia 35. Kuwait 62. South Africa 9. Brazil 36. Laos 63. Spain 10. Bulgaria 37. Lebanon 64. Sudan 11. Cambodia 38. Lithuania 65. Sweden 12. Canada 39. Mali 66. Switzerland 13. China 40. Mexico 67. Syria 14. Cuba 41. Morocco 68. Taiwan 15. Czech Republic 42. Myanmar 69. Thailand 16. Egypt 43. Netherlands 70. Tunisia 17. Ethiopia 44. New Zealand 71. Turkey 18. Finland 45. Nigeria 72. Uganda 19. France 46. Oman 73. Ukraine 20. Germany 47. Pakistan 74. United Arab Emirates 21. Ghana 48. Paraguay 75. United Kingdom 22. Greece 49. Peru 76. United States 23. Hungary 50. Philippines 77. Uzbekistan 24. Iceland 51. Poland 78. Venezuela 25. India 52. Portugal 79. Vietnam 26. Indonesia 53. Qatar 80. Zambia 27. Iran 54. Romania 6 of 10 Please note, *(O) next to any Country’s name marks the Observer status in that Committee. 5. UN SECURITY COUNCIL EMERGENCY MEETING (DOUBLE DELEGATION) 1. The People's Republic of China 7. Côte d’Ivoire 13. Peru 2. France 8. Dominican Republic 14. Poland 3. Russia 9. Equatorial Guinea 15. South Africa 4. United Kingdom 10. Germany 16. Venezuela (0) 5. United States of America 11. Indonesia 6. Belgium 12. Kuwait 6. HISTORIC COMMITTEE: NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANISATION (2011) 1. Albania 13. Iceland 25. Slovenia 2. Belgium 14. Italy 26. Spain 3. Bulgaria 15. Latvia 27. Turkey 4. Canada 16. Lithuania 28. United Kingdom 5. Croatia 17. Luxembourg 29. United States 6. Czech Republic 18. Montenegro 30. Sweden(O) 7. Denmark 19. Netherlands 31. Finland (O) 8. Estonia 20. Norway 32. Austria (O) 9. France 21. Poland 33. Ireland (O) 10. Germany 22. Portugal 34. Switzerland (O) 11. Greece 23. Romania 35. Saudi Arabia (O) 12. Hungary 24. Slovakia 7 of 10 7. ACADEMIC CONGRESS (HISTORIC) 1. Bhagat Singh 14. Pritilata Waddedar 27. Hakim Ajmal Khan 2. Chandrashekhar Azad 15. Mahatma Gandhi 28. Edulji Wacha 3. Udham Singh 16. Subhash Chandra Bose 29. Madan Mohan Malviya 4. Ashfaqulla Khan 17. Motilal Nehru 30. Annie Besant 5. Vinayak Damodar 18. 31. Savarkar Jawaharlal Nehru Lala Lajpat Rai 6. Batukeshwar Dutt 19. Vallabhbhai Patel 32. Pattabhi Sitaramayya 7. Sukhdev Thapar 20. Abul Kalam Azad 33. Mukhtar Ahmad Ansari 8. Shivaram Hari Rajguru 21. Rajendra Prasad 34. Sachindra Nath Sanyal 9. Surya Sen 22. Sarojini Naidu 35. Bhikaji Cama 10. 23. Deshbandu 36. Jatinder Nath Das Chittaranjan Das Lala Hardayal 11. Barindar Kumar Ghosh 24. Lal Bahadur Shastri 37. Aga Khan Iii 12. Ambika Chakrabarty 25. Muhammad Ali Jinnah 38. A.K. Fazlul Huq 13. Rash Behari Bose 26. Liaquat Ali Khan 39. Mohammad Ali Bogra 8. OPEN FORUM Member 1 Member 9 Member 17 Member 25 Member 33 Member 2 Member 10 Member 18 Member 26 Member 34 Member 3 Member 11 Member 19 Member 27 Member 35 Member 4 Member 12 Member 20 Member 28 Member 36 Member 5 Member 13 Member 21 Member 29 Member 37 Member 6 Member 14 Member 22 Member 30 Member 38 Member 7 Member 15 Member 23 Member 31 Member 39 Member 8 Member 16 Member 24 Member 32 Member 40 8 of 10 9. STAKEHOLDERS’ MEET 1. Romila Thapar 16. Rajeev Nigam 31. Ravish Kumar 2. Akeel Bilgrami 17. Tanmay Bhat 32. Arnab Goswami 3. Amartya Sen 18. Rahul Subramanian 33. Barkha Dutt 4. Bipan Chandra 19. Hasan Minhaj 34. Faye D’Souza 5. Mushirul Hasan 20. Rehman Khan 35. Sagarika Ghose 6. Partha Chatterjee 21. Amit Shah 36. Prannoy Roy 7. Irfan Habib 22. Sachin Pilot 37. Shekhar Gupta 8. DN Jha 23. Shashi Tharoor 38. Vikram Chandra 9. Tanika Sarkar 24. Yogendra Yadav 39. Rana Ayyub 10. KN Panikkar 25. Sambit Patra 40. Siddharth Varadarajan 11. Varun Grover 26. Arvind Kejriwal 12. Kunal Kamra 27. Kanhaiya Kumar 13. Sorabh Pant 28. Omar Abdullah 14. Sanjay Rajoura 29. Yogi Adityanath 15. Abijit Ganguly 30. Subramanian Swamy 9 of 10 10. LOK SABHA 1. Asaduddin Owaisi 21. Kiren Rijiju 41. Abhijit Mukherjee 2. Anupriya Patel 22. Radha Mohan Singh 42. B.V. Naik 3. Kunwar Haribansh 23. 43. Singh Meenakshi Lekhi Shashi Tharoor 4. Lal Krishna Advani 24. Manoj Tiwari 44. K.C. Venugopal 5. Vinod Chavda 25. Kalraj Mishra 45. Nandi Yellaiah 6. Pankaj Chowdhary 26. Shripad Yesso Naik 46. Ravneet Singh 7. Dharambir Singh 27. Paresh Rawal 47. Raghu Sharma 8. Rajesh Kumar diwakar 28. Dr. Ram Shankar 48. Farooq Abdullah 9. Satish Chandra Dubey 29. Ramesh Pokhriyal 49. Nishank Bhagwant Mann 10. Maneka Gandhi 30. Gajendra Shekhawat 50. Sadhu Singh 11. Satish Kumar Gautam 31. Narendra Singh Tomar 51. Ranjit Singh Brahmpura 12. Harsh Vardhan 32. Rahul Gandhi 52. Harsimrat Kaur Badal 13. Hema Malini 33. Sonia Gandhi 53. Mohammed Faizal P.P. 14. Murli Manohar Joshi 34. B.N. Chandrappa 54. R. Radhakrishnan 15. Narendra Modi 35. Km. Sushmita 55. Saugata Roy 16. Sushma Swaraj 36. Ninong Ering 56. Dinesh Trivedi 17. Rajnath Singh 37. Gaurav Gogoi 57. Mohammed Salim 18.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Allahabad Division)-2018
    List of Sixteen Lok Sabha- Members (Allahabad Division)-2018 S. Constituency/ Name of Member Permanent Address & Mobile No. Present N. Party Address & Mobile No. 1 CNB/BJP Dr. Murli Manohar Joshi 9/10-A tagore Nagar, Anukul 6, Raisina Road. New Chandra Banerjee Road, Allahabad- Delhi-110001 211002,(UP) Tel.No. (011) C/O Mr. Lalit Singh, 15/96 H Civil 23718444, 23326080 Lines, Kanpur-208001 Phone No. 0512-2399555 2 ALD/BJP Sri Shyama Charan Gupta. 44- Thornhill Road, Allahabad A-5, Gulmohar Park, .211002 (U.P) Khelgaon Road, New Ph.N0. (0532)2468585 & 86 Delhi-110049 Mob.No. 09415235305(M) Fax.N. (0532)2468579 Tels. No.(011)26532666, 26527359 3 Akbarpur Sri Devendra Singh Bhole 117/P/17 Kakadev, Kanpur (CNB/Dehat)/ Mob No.9415042234 BJP Tel. No. 0512-2500021 4 Rewa/BJP Sri Janardan Mishra Villagae & Post- Hinauta Distt.- Rewa Mob. No.-9926984118 5 Chanduli/BJP Dr. Mahendra Nath Pandey B 22/157-7, Sarswati Nagar New Maharastra Vinayaka, Distt.- Varanasi (UP) Sadan Mob. No. 09415023457 K.G. Marg, New Delhi- 110001 6 Banda/BJP Sri Bhairon Prasad Mishra Gandhiganj, Allahabad Road Karvi, Distt.-Chitrakut Mob. No.-09919020862 7 ETAH/BJP Sri Rajveer Singh A-10 Raj Palace, Mains Road, Ashok Hotel, (Raju Bhaiya) Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh Chankayank Puri New (0571) 2504040,09457011111, Delhi-110021 09756077777(M) 8 Gautam Buddha Dr. Mahesh Sharma 404 Sector- 15-A Nagar/BJP Noida-201301 (UP) Tel No.(102)- 2486666, 2444444 Mob. No.09873444255 9 Agra/BJP Dr. Ram Shankar Katheriya 1,Teachers home University Campus 43, North Avenue, Khandari, New Delhi-110001 Agra-02 (UP) Mob.
    [Show full text]
  • India Postpoll NES 2019-Survey Findings
    All India Postpoll NES 2019-Survey Findings Q1: In whatever financial condition you are placed today, on the whole are you satisfied or dissatisfied with it? N (%) 1: Fully satisfied 4937 20.4 2: Somewhat satisfied 11253 46.4 3: Somewhat dissatisfied 3777 15.6 4: Fully dissatisfied 3615 14.9 7: Can't say 428 1.8 8: No response 225 .9 Total 24235 100.0 Q2: As compared to five years ago, how is the economic condition of your household today – would you say it has become much better, better, remained same, become worse or much worse? N (%) 1: Much better 2280 9.4 2: Better 7827 32.3 3: Remained Same 10339 42.7 4: Worse 2446 10.1 5: Much worse 978 4.0 7: Can't say 205 .8 8: No response 159 .7 Total 24235 100.0 Q3: Many people talk about class nowadays, and use terms such as lower class, middle class or upper class. In your opinion, compared to other households, the household you live in currently belongs to which class? N (%) 1: Lower class 5933 24.5 2: Middle class 13459 55.5 3: Upper Class 1147 4.7 6: Poor class 1741 7.2 CSDS, LOKNITI, DELHI Page 1 All India Postpoll NES 2019-Survey Findings 7: Can't say 254 1.0 8: No response 1701 7.0 Total 24235 100.0 Q4: From where or which medium do you mostly get news on politics? N (%) 01: Television/TV news channel 11841 48.9 02: Newspapers 2365 9.8 03: Radio 247 1.0 04: Internet/Online news websites 361 1.5 05: Social media (in general) 400 1.7 06: Facebook 78 .3 07: Twitter 59 .2 08: Whatsapp 99 .4 09: Instagram 19 .1 10: Youtube 55 .2 11: Mobile phone 453 1.9 12: Friends/neighbours 695 2.9 13:
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of India R a J Y a S a B H a Committees
    Com. Co-ord. Sec. PARLIAMENT OF INDIA R A J Y A S A B H A COMMITTEES OF RAJYA SABHA AND OTHER PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES AND BODIES ON WHICH RAJYA SABHA IS REPRESENTED (Corrected upto 4th September, 2020) RAJYA SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI (4th September, 2020) Website: http://www.rajyasabha.nic.in E-mail: [email protected] OFFICERS OF RAJYA SABHA CHAIRMAN Shri M. Venkaiah Naidu SECRETARY-GENERAL Shri Desh Deepak Verma PREFACE The publication aims at providing information on Members of Rajya Sabha serving on various Committees of Rajya Sabha, Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees, Joint Committees and other Bodies as on 30th June, 2020. The names of Chairmen of the various Standing Committees and Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committees along with their local residential addresses and telephone numbers have also been shown at the beginning of the publication. The names of Members of the Lok Sabha serving on the Joint Committees on which Rajya Sabha is represented have also been included under the respective Committees for information. Change of nominations/elections of Members of Rajya Sabha in various Parliamentary Committees/Statutory Bodies is an ongoing process. As such, some information contained in the publication may undergo change by the time this is brought out. When new nominations/elections of Members to Committees/Statutory Bodies are made or changes in these take place, the same get updated in the Rajya Sabha website. The main purpose of this publication, however, is to serve as a primary source of information on Members representing various Committees and other Bodies on which Rajya Sabha is represented upto a particular period.
    [Show full text]
  • You Have Made It to Phase 3 of ET Campus Stars 4.0. Now Get Ready
    CONGRATULATIONS TO THE SHORTLISTED CANDIDATES You have made it to Phase 3 of ET Campus Stars 4.0. Now get ready for an exciting online assessment. Phase 3 is a Group Exercise and Leadership Competency Index Test that will evaluate you on your inter-personal abilities, group dynamics skills, leadership traits, and personality attributes. Please note the next steps: The online session details (including date & time) for Phase 3 assessment would be shared with you directly over the email. The shortlisted candidates have to share their details for verification, such as: •Name •Registered mobile number •College name •College ID card photo •Engineering batch •Current engineering year Please mail the above details at [email protected] latest by 29 June 2021. The list is in alphabetical order and does not endorse/promote any rank/marks Name College City A Benjimen BV Raju Institute of Technology Narsapur Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam - College A.Divija Sri Tirupati of Engineering Gautam Buddha University - College of Aadarsh Kumar Shrivastav Greater Noida Engineering Aadya Srivastava Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology Bhubaneshwar Oriental Institute of Science & Technology - Aakarsh Nema Bhopal Bhopal Aakash Garg Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology Delhi Aakash Ravindra Shinde NBN sinhgad school of Engineering - Pune Pune Aakash Yadav IMS Engineering College Ghaziabad Cummins College of Engineering for Women - Aaliyah Ahmed Pune Pune Chandigarh Group of Colleges - College of Aarju Tripathi Greater Mohali Engineering Lovely
    [Show full text]
  • 29 April Page 1
    Evening daily Imphal Times Regd.No. MANENG /2013/51092 Volume 6, Issue 432 Sunday, April 28, 2019 Maliyapham Palcha kumsing 3416 Cyclone FANI likely to hit North Chief Minister N. Biren inspect Chadong East including Manipur tomorrow incident site; announces ban on unauthorized IT News boat at tourism related spot (with inputs from PIB) Imphal, April 29, IT News Imphal, April 29, The Cyclonic Storm FANI, which has its root at Bay of Chief Minister N. Birenshing Bengal is likely to hit the today announced banned to North Eastern states of India the use of unauthorized local including Manipur by the made boat at lakes which are evening of May 1, PIB report tourism related sites of the says as per notification by the state. The announcement was Ministry of Earth Science. A made after inspecting the freak storm possibly an impact Ramrei/Chadong Village today of the Cyclonic FANI morning where three persons yesterday killed 3 persons including a woman were killed including a woman while in yesterday freak storm while enjoying Boat ride at Chadong they were enjoying boat ride. artificial lake. Many trees and The fierce storm that lasted for houses were also destroyed at Bengal & neighbourhood hours and into a Very Severe around 30 minutes blown the various places in the nearly 30 moved northwards with a Cyclonic Storm duringboats that the three were riding minutes deadly storm. Report speed of about 04 kmph in last subsequent 24 hours. It is very and as it turn upside-down said that wind speed reached six hours and lay centred at likely to move bodies the trio could not be 50-60 km per hour and came 0830 hrs IST of 29th April, 2019 northwestwards till May 1 found till today morning.
    [Show full text]
  • 3RXYV] Hz D 4¶Xrcy 4> Crtv
    & 8, 5 5 5 "$%&"'()*+ +,+,- '()"* .(/! "2:4 & ,!4#4 " 61,9%6 2# !44 4 , ! " # ""#$!#% %#%#% ;9#9,! ,# 4#4:2,%24 #2&!,9%(-*2% #&#%%# !*<""# <+= > 4 (,-.()/ (*- R !"R $ "% # 23# he powerful OBC leader TBhupesh Baghel overcame all odds and outsmarted his competitors within the party on Sunday as he was chosen unan- imously as the leader of the # 4 #425# 6&# . Congress Legislature Party in a jam-packed but emotionally ighlighting the Supreme charged-up meeting at party HCourt clean chit to the State headquarters here. Government in the Rafale deal, Congress observer Prime Minister on Sunday Mallikarjun Kharge informed unleashed a vicious attack on mediapersons that Baghel the Congress from the home emerged as consensus candi- turf of its supreme leader, Sonia date for the next Chief Minister Gandhi, and hurled corruption of the mineral-rich State. The charges against the grand old 58-year-old five-time legislator party in defence purchases # Baghel will take oath as the making stinging jibes like the *2 ) third Chief Minister of absence of “Quattrocchi uncle” Chhattisgarh on Monday at or Christian Michel in the BJP trict here on Sunday. 4.30 pm at Science College Government’s defence pro- He also asked why is it that ground. curement. The Prime Minister whenever Congress made Kharge said names of also accused the Congress of attack on the Ministers would be declared trying to malign and influence Indian Army, later “after detailed discussions judiciary. people from the across the with all stake-holders”. The Prime Minister was border in Pakistan clap and State Congress president making his first public speech why they appreciate the coun- Baghel faced a stiff challenge after the Supreme Court gave try’s oldest party.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Teplate
    Volume-03 ISSN: 2455-3085 (Online) Issue-09 RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary September-2018 www.rrjournals.com [UGC Listed Journal] Succession planning in Politics: A Study in Indian context 1Dr. Ella Mittal & *2Parvinder Kaur 1Assistant professor, Department of Basic & Applied sciences, Punjabi university Patiala (India) *2Research scholar, Department of Basic & Applied sciences, Punjabi university Patiala (India) ARTICLE DETAILS ABSTRACT Article History The present study is about the succession planning in politics. The study traced the dynasty Published Online: 07 September 2018 of succession in various political parties. Political parties at central and state level are discussed in order to examine the succession planning among the political families. Politics is Keywords considered as business rather than a profession. BJP and regional parties are seen as legacy, Political dynasty, Political blaming Congress for family succession as their culture but have also proliferated their parties, Succession planning families in heading chief positions. Nowadays politics of India is passing through the *Corresponding Author transition and „promoting the family‟ appears to be a consistent part of their life. Leaders need Email: saini.parvinder80[at]gmail.com to change their behaviour of selfishness in order to boost the country to grow and prosper without any hindrance of corruption. 1. Introduction responsibility to ensure the „stability of tenure of personnel‟. Fayol believed that key positions would end being occupied by Succession planning is a process of thinking and unskilled or ill-prepared people if the need is ignored earlier at assuming new incumbent as a successor of the key position in proper time (Rothwell 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Behaviour Assessment and Ranking of PRI Members, Natural and Faith Based Leaders and Dipstick Assessment of ASHA, Anganwadi Workers
    Rapid Behaviour assessment and ranking of PRI members, Natural and faith based leaders And Dipstick assessment of ASHA, Anganwadi workers Bihar and Uttar Pradesh 1 Febr16 Table of Contents Executive Summary Key Recommendations 1. Background 1.1 Programme: A brief description on intervention, geography, school settings 1.2 Objectives of the study 2. Methodology 2.1 Sample size calculation 3. Data collection and tools 3.1 Training of teams 3.2 Ensuring data quality 4. Socio Demographic Profile Go to Table of Contents 2 Executive Summary The aim of the study is to assess the behaviour and knowledge of the PRI members and ASHA Angadawadi workers on issues such as open defecation and hand washing practices and also their awareness about the Swach Bharat Program of the Indian Government. For the purpose of the Study, a survey was carried out in 4 Districts of UP and Bihar in which respondents from over 201 villages were interviewed. Amongst the ASHA and Angadwadi workers, almost all have received some sort of formal education and also hygiene training and all of them are house makers. On the other side, primary occupation of most of the PRI members is farming with very less in business and self- employment. When asked about the time given by these workers and leaders in interacting and solving issues of the fellow villagers, over 57% in Bihar and 52% in UP said to devote somewhere between 1 to 2 hours every day. In the survey conducted, lack of proper facilities was founded to be the major reason behind open defecation with more than 75% of the respondents in both states saying so.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Roll No Enrol No Name Father's Name Mother's Name M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 Total Result AU 1957021 U1321068 ALOK KUMAR YADAV RA
    Unit Roll No Enrol No Name Father's Name Mother's Name M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 Total Result AU 1957021 U1321068 ALOK KUMAR YADAV RAMESH CHANDRA YADAV REETA YADAV 51 51 64 62 61 58 53 400 Passed AU 1957022 U1223703 ALOK UPADHYAY KRISHNA PRATAP UPADHYAY NEELAM UPADHYAY52 44 58 63 56 AA 51 324 Elig.for SE AU 1957023 U0820048 AMIT GUPTA HARILAL GUPTA GEETA GUPTA 60 52 63 64 62 53 60 414 Passed AU 1957024 U1771070 AMIT KUMAR SHIV PRASAD GAYATRI DEVI 48 42 66 61 59 51 49 376 Passed AU 1957025 U1760291 AMIT KUMAR OJHA OM PRAKASH OJHA SHYAMA OJHA 48 53 64 63 57 57 45 387 Passed AU 1957026 05AU/363 AMIT KUMAR PANDEY SURYA BHUSHAN PANDEY GEETA DEVI AA AA AA AA AA AA AA Abs Absent AU 1957027 U1760293 AMIT KUMAR SHRIWASTAW ANIL KUMAR SHRIWASTAW KALANDI DEVI 48 40 29 52 15 00 45 229 Failed AU 1957028 U1320016 ANAND KUMAR SHUKLA HARI SHANKAR SHUKLA MADHURI SHUKLA 52 51 64 63 62 49 60 401 Passed AU 1957029 D1430079 ANAND KUMAR YADAV RAJESHWER YADAV MATESHWARI DEVI 44 60 63 55 58 57 57 394 Passed AU 1957030 U1420380 ANAND SINGH LALJI SINGH LAVANGI DEVI 46 63 54 43 60 50 48 364 Passed AU 1957031 13AU/3081 ANAND SINGH SHAILENDRA PRATAP SINGH SHASHI SINGH 63 48 55 50 58 55 57 386 Passed AU 1957032 U1771010 ANAND YADAV VED PRAKASH YADAV KUSUM DEVI 59 62 AA 53 61 58 60 353 Elig.for SE AU 1957033 U1771067 ANANT KUMAR ARVIND KUMAR MISHRA SHALINI MISHRA 54 57 64 53 65 59 60 412 Passed AU 1957034 U1771002 ANANT VABHAV ASHOK KUMAR RANI DEVI 52 64 60 57 53 48 50 384 Passed AU 1957035 U1210432 ANIL KUMAR YADAV RAM KISHUN YADAV SUKHIYA DEVI 51 70 63 53 67 56 60 420 Passed
    [Show full text]
  • High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List
    HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR MONDAY,THE 09TH JANUARY,2012 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 TO 35 2. COMPANY JURISDICTION 36 TO 38 3. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 39 TO 50 4. REGISTRAR GENERAL / 51 TO 66 REGISTRAR (ORGL.) / REGISTRAR (ADMN.) / JOINT REGISTRARS (ORGL.) 09.01.2012 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 09.01.2012 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 DIVISION BENCH-1 HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW [NOTE: NO PASSOVER SHALL BE GIVEN IN THE FIRST TEN MATTERS.] FOR ADMISSION _______________ 1. CRL.M.C. 2649/2011 SONIA KHOSLA APPLICANT IN-PERSON,DEEPAK CRL.M.A. 10961-10962/2011 Vs. VIKRAM BAKSHI AND ORS. KHOSLA 2. LPA 600/2009 UOI RAVINDER AGGARWAL,RAJ KUMAR CM APPL. 16798-16799/2009 Vs. UMA JAIN AND ANR. MEHTA CM APPL. 16801/2009 3. W.P.(C) 8630/2011 ARUN KUMAR JAIN WASIM ASHRAF Vs. DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL III THROUGH REGISTRAR AND ORS 4. W.P.(C) 8946/2011 INDIAN PRIVATE PORTS AND J.SAGAR CM APPL. 20185/2011 TERMINALS AND ANR Vs. UOI QAND ORS AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS ____________________________ 5. CO.APP. 58-59/2011 ADVANCE TELEVISION NETWORK RC BERI LTD Vs. REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES 6. LPA 741/2010 STEEL AUTHORITY INDIA LTD KIRTI MISHRA,RITA CM APPL. 18479/2010 Vs. ELECTRO STELL CASTINGS SHARMA,SANJAY ABBOT,GAURAV LTD AND ORS KEJRIWAL 7. CM APPL. 21597/2011 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION HANU BHASKAR,GS CHARYA In LPA 628/2011 Vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Stand-Up Comedians and Their Fight Against India's Anti
    Universität Potsdam Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik Abschlussarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Master of Education (M.Ed.) Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Dirk Wiemann Zweitgutachterin: Dr. Tania Meyer Comedy as Resistance: Indian Stand-Up Comedians and Their Fight Against India’s Anti-Democratic Tendencies Lea Sophie Nüske Master: Englisch und Französisch auf Lehramt Matrikelnr.: 765845 Selbstständigkeitserklärung Hiermit versichere ich, Lea Nüske, dass ich die Masterarbeit selbstständig und nur mit den angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmitteln angefertigt habe. Alle Stellen der Arbeit, die ich aus diesen Quellen und Hilfsmitteln dem Wortlaut oder dem Sinne nach entnommen habe, sind kenntlich gemacht und im Literaturverzeichnis aufgeführt. Berlin, den 3. August 2018 Lea Nüske Zusammenfassung Die vorliegende Arbeit Comedy as Resistance – Indian Stand-Up Comedians and Their Fight Against India’s Anti-Democratic Tendencies beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, ob und inwiefern Stand-Up Comedy in Indien als Mittel zum sozio-politischen Widerstand genutzt wird und wie weitreichend dieser Widerstand einzuschätzen ist. Um diese Frage zu beantworten werden zunächst die Merkmale des Genres sowie ihre Funktionen untersucht, um herauszustellen, weshalb sich besonders Stand-Up Comedy dafür eignet, indirekten politischen Widerstand zu leisten. Auch die Geschichte des satirischen Widerstandes und des Genres Stand-Up Comedy im indischen Kontext sowie die soziale Spaltung der Gesellschaft, die durch verschiedene Konflikte zum Ausdruck gebracht wird
    [Show full text]
  • Page-1.Qxd (Page 3)
    MONDAY, JULY 20, 2015 (PAGE 4) DAILY EXCELSIOR, JAMMU From page 1 Army concerned over Kashmiri youth joining terror groups Cong suspends 3 top party leaders society, as to what are the rea- numbers are not very large, of “radicalisation, youth social media campaign. The ror group Hizbul Mujahideen, sons that the youth are going but it is tragedy where you engagement, development and magazines they are coming while in the other axis from from primary membership into this direction and is there have young people who unfor- how we can address these out... Definitely, there is an Palhalan to Sopore this group AICC (I) members earlier. Mohammad Sharief Niaz. The ic and unfortunate'' saying this some way to stop this.” tunately pick up the gun. issues”. attempt to attract youth towards as well as few militants of PCC (I) chief GA Mir told the last two hadn't attended the unilateral decision has risked the “The manner, in which they “They are not very well Hooda said “there is sense them and if somebody is watch- Jaish-e-Mohammad are call- Excelsior that the Central meeting then. party's future in the State as (terror groups) use social media trained. We are seeing incidents of alienation also. We cannot get ing it, we cannot 100 per cent ing the shots, say police offi- Disciplinary Committee took the Meanwhile, former multi-pronged challenges posed and how they manage to engage of these people being killed in away from it. These are issues say absolutely that there is no cials. decision to suspend three senior Minister and suspended by new political dimensions the youth, is serious.
    [Show full text]