DOCSLIB.ORG

By Betsy J. Donald a Thesis Submitted In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

by Betsy J. Donald A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirernents for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Geography University of Toronto @ Copyright by Betsy I. Donald 1999 National Library Bibliothèque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Welüngton OnawaON K1A ON4 OttawaON KlAW Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distriiute or seU reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis m microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfichelfilm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in ths thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts f?om it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ECONOMICCHANCE AND CITY-REGIONGOVERNANCE: THE CASEOF TORONTO Doctor of Philosophy 1999 Betsy J. Donald Graduate Department of Geography University of Toronto This thesis explains why the Toronto city-region underwent a policy transformation in its govemance structures, functions and jurisdictional boundaries between 1994-1998. What forces precipitated this change? How had Toronto earned its reputation as the 'city that worked'? Why did it stop 'working'? Are the policy proposais of the pst four years capable of resolving ernerging contradictions in the region's economic dcvelopment? These questions are explored in both an historical and contemporary context by drawing on insights of regulatory theory, urban regime theory, and an analysis of Canada's changing fiscal federalism. This approach infoms the role that institutions (regardless of origin or territorial scope) play in sustaining a local accumulation systern, and how this 'local' accumulation grounds a national regulatory mode and regime of accumulation. The approach also explores the relationship between regime and regulation theories in the context of policy formation and institution building. While postwar Toronto developed within a Fordist regime of accumulation, its elements of regulation at the city-region scale were distinctive. Toronto benefited fkom national regulatory policies, but its economic dynamism also constituted a comerstone of the nation's economic and social viability. Moreover, its localized regulatory structures had a unique institutional richness, which accornmodated many of the crisis tendencies felt by other industrial regions in the mid 1970s and early 1980s. Toronto's own 'stnictural crisis' did not fblly manifest itself until the late 1980s and early 1990s, when fiee trade, resû-ucturing, and other globalization forces emerged. These also influenced the policies and institutions of Canadian federalism, which affected the governance of Toronto. Institutions (such as 'Metro') that had regulated the city- region during the Fordist regime of accumulation were now implicated in its cnsis. This led to a demand for change in Toronto's govemance structures and functions. This study concludes that the policy set now being implemented is incapable of resolving the region's crisis tendencies. Policies of regional competition based on cost reduction clash with the quality-based strategy that was a comerstone of Toronto's past success. Notwithstanding extemal forces, the current policy set is not inevitable. Globalization does not predetermine al1 spatial-economic outcornes. f am deeply grateful to my Ph.D. supervisor, Professor Menc S. Gertler, for his support and direction throughout the doctoral program and in the preparation of this dissertation. He is an outstanding scholar and teacher and 1 fortunate to have worked with him. My inteliectual debt to him is evident throughout the following pages. I would also like to thank my committee memben for their ongoing interest and incisive comments: Professor Car1 G. Amrhein, Professor Gunter H. K. Gad, Professor Robert D. Lewis, and Professor Susan M. Ruddick. Professor Lany S. Boume and Professor Jim T. Lemon also provided direction on earlier versions of this dissertation for which 1 am very thankful. 1 would like to acknowledge the financial support of The Social Sciences and Hurnanities Research Council of Canada Doctoral Fellowship as well as the University of Toronto Connaught Doctoral Entrance Scholarship. The Department of Geography also provided me with research grants and teaching oppomuiities. In particular, 1 am grateful for the opportunity to have worked with Professor J. Robert S. Prichard in his capacity as Commissioner on the Golden Task Force. Thank you to the many policymakers, businesspeople, social activists and citizens who agreed to be interviewed for this research, to the helpful staff at the Metropolitan Toronto Archives, and to my colleagues for their wise advice. Finally, 1would like to acknowledge the support of my farnily, and in particular my parents, Jim and Marie Donald, who have always encouraged me to pursue higher education. Most importantly, 1 would like to thank my husband, Doug Morrow, whose unenhg love, intelligence and inspiration makes it al1 possible. Doug, you are wondefil. List of Tables and Figures ................................................... -vii- htroduction ................................................................. 1 . Theissue ............................................................ -I- The Setting ........................................................... -2- TheArgument ........................................................ -4- TheMethod .......................................................... -8- Economic Change and City-region Governance: Theoretical Underpinnings ............................................... 14- ReguIationTheory .................................................... -21- Regime Theory ....................................................... -34- My Approach ........................................................ -37- Toronto's Golden Age (1945-1989) What Made it Work for So Long? ........................................ -40- Introduction ......................................................... 30- The regulation approach and the Canadian context ........................... -43- The Toronto Area Economy in the Postwar (1 945- 1988) ...................... -47- 1945- 1964: Planning Fordism .......................................... -48- 1965- 1975: Full-swing Fordism ......................................... -65- 1 976- 1988: Unravelling Fordism ........................................ -85- What Made it Work ................................................... -98- Toronto's Economic Crisis and the Shattering of Regulatory Confidence (1 989- 1994) .................................... 105- Introduction ........................................................ -105- Features of Toronto's Fordism in Crisis ................................... 110- ConcIusion .......................................................... 134- Responding to Economic Crisis Exploring New Institutions for Greater Toronto ................................................... 136- introduction ........................................................-136- Setting the stage for governance review in the GTA ......................... - 1 4 1 - Provincial Response .................................................. -1 53- hterpreting the Changes .............................................. -1 84- Conclusion ......................................................... - 1 92- CHAPTER6 Conclusion ............................................................... -1 93- Tables and Figures ........................................................ -206- References ............................................................... -2 19- Appendix ................................................................ -233- LISTOF TABLESAND FIGURES TABLES Table 1 : Places of birth of Toronto immigrants 1996 (Toronto CMA) .............. 206 Table 2: Developrnent of public-sector planning activities in the Metropoliian Toronto Planning area, 1953and1957 ..................................................207 Table 3: Comparative economic statistics .Metro Toronto. Ontario and Canada, 1969-1974 .................................... 208 Table 4: Cornparison of unemployment rates: Toronto. Ontario and Canada, 1968-1975 ................................... -209 Table 5: Summary of the major elements of the mode of regulation operating at the city- region scale in Toronto. 1945- 1989 ..................................210 Table 6: Changes in responsibilities between provincial and municipal governments . 21 1 Table 7: Interpretations of recent govemance events in Toronto ................... 212 Figure 1: A graphic example of the changing industrial landscape in the Toronto region between 1932 and 1953 ......................... 213 Figure 2: Toronto's strategic location (1957) .................................. 214 Figure 3: Toronto's electric power at cost (1957) ............................... 215 Figure 4: Population growth in the Toronto region. 1945- 1953 .................... 216 Figure 5: The Toronto economic district (1 957) ...............................
Recommended publications
  • Toward City Charters in Canada

    Toward City Charters in Canada

    Journal of Law and Social Policy Volume 34 Toronto v Ontario: Implications for Canadian Local Democracy Guest Editors: Alexandra Flynn & Mariana Article 8 Valverde 2021 Toward City Charters in Canada John Sewell Chartercitytoronto.ca Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/jlsp Part of the Law Commons Citation Information Sewell, John. "Toward City Charters in Canada." Journal of Law and Social Policy 34. (2021): 134-164. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/jlsp/vol34/iss1/8 This Voices and Perspectives is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Law and Social Policy by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Sewell: Toward City Charters in Canada Toward City Charters in Canada JOHN SEWELL FOR MORE THAN 30 YEARS, there has been discussion about how cities in Canada can gain more authority and the freedom, powers, and resources necessary to govern their own affairs. The problem goes back to the time of Confederation in 1867, when eighty per cent of Canadians lived in rural areas. Powerful provinces were needed to unite the large, sparsely populated countryside, to pool resources, and to provide good government. Toronto had already become a city in 1834 with a democratically elected government, but its 50,000 people were only around three per cent of Ontario’s 1.6 million. Confederation negotiations did not even consider the idea of conferring governmental power to Toronto or other municipalities, dividing it instead solely between the soon-to-be provinces and the new central government.
  • The New Geography of Office Location and The

    The New Geography of Office Location and The

    Prepared by: Canadian Urban Institute The New Geography of Office Location 555 Richmond St. W., Suite 402, PO Box 612 and the Consequences of Toronto, ON M5V 3B1 Canada Business as Usual in the GTA 416-365-0816 416-365-0650 [email protected] This reportMarch has 2011 been prepared for the Toronto Office Coalition, March 18, 2011. http://www.canurb.org Research Team: Canadian Urban Institute Glenn R. Miller, Vice President, Education & Research, FCIP, RPP Iain Myrans, Senior Planner, MCIP, RPP Juan Carlos Molina, Geospatial Analyst, MSA Thomas Sullivan, GIS & Policy Analyst, B Sc Danielle Berger, GIS Research Assistant Mike Dror, GIS Research Assistant Real Estate Search Corporation Iain Dobson, Principal & Senior Associate, Canadian Urban Institute Hammersmith Communications Philippa Campsie, Principal & Senior Associate, Canadian Urban Institute All photography in this document by Iain Myrans. This report has been prepared for the Toronto Office Coalition, March 18, 2011. Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Recommendations.............................................................................................................. 7 1. Business Competitiveness in the GTA, Five Years On............................................................................. 9 2. Changes and trends since 2005 .............................................................................................................
  • Re-Imagining Community Councils in Canadian Local Government

    Re-Imagining Community Councils in Canadian Local Government

    IMFG P M F G N. • Re-imagining Community Councils in Canadian Local Government Alexandra Flynn and Zachary Spicer IMFG Papers on Municipal Finance and Governance Re-imagining Community Councils in Canadian Local Government By Alexandra Flynn and Zachary Spicer Institute on Municipal Finance & Governance Munk School of Global Affairs University of Toronto 1 Devonshire Place Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 3K7 e-mail contact: [email protected] http://munkschool.utoronto.ca/imfg/ Series editors: Philippa Campsie and Selena Zhang © Copyright held by authors ISBN 978-0-7727-0988-2 ISSN 1927-1921 About IMFG The Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance (IMFG) is an academic research hub and non-partisan think tank based in the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto. IMFG focuses on the fiscal health and governance challenges facing large cities and city- regions. Its objective is to spark and inform public debate and to engage the academic and policy communities around important issues of municipal finance and governance. The Institute conducts original research on issues facing cities in Canada and around the world; promotes high-level discussion among Canada’s government, academic, corporate, and community leaders through conferences and roundtables; and supports graduate and post- graduate students to build Canada’s cadre of municipal finance and governance experts. It is the only institute in Canada that focuses solely on municipal finance issues in large cities and city-regions. IMFG is funded by the Province of Ontario, the City of Toronto, Avana Capital Corporation, Maytree, and TD Bank Group. Authors Alexandra Flynn is an Assistant Professor in the City Studies program at the University of Toronto (Scarborough).
  • Conserving the Modern in Canada Buildings, Ensembles, and Sites: 1945-2005

    Conserving the Modern in Canada Buildings, Ensembles, and Sites: 1945-2005

    Conserving the Modern in Canada Buildings, ensembles, and sites: 1945-2005 Conference Proceedings Trent University, Peterborough, May 6-8, 2005 Editors: Susan Algie, Winnipeg Architecture Foundation James Ashby, Docomomo Canada-Ontario Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Conserving the Modern in Canada (2005: Trent University) Conserving the Modern in Canada: buildings, ensembles, and sites, 1945-2005: conference proceedings, Trent University, Peterborough, May 6-8, 2005 / editors: Susan Algie and James Ashby. Papers presented at the Conserving the Modern in Canada conference held at Trent University, Peterborough, Ont., May 6-8, 2005. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-9683100-5-2 1. Architecture--Conservation and restoration--Canada. 2. Historic sites--Conservation and restoration--Canada. 3. Architecture--Canada--20th century. 4. Historic preservation--Canada. I. Algie, Susan, 1951 II. Ashby, James, 1962 III. Winnipeg Architecture Foundation. NA109.C3C66 2007 363.6'90971 C2007-902448-3 Also available in French. / Aussi disponible en francais. Conserving the Modern in Canada Conference Proceedings Table of Contents 1.0 Foreword . 1 2.0 Acknowledgements . 3 3.0 Conference Programme . 9 4.0 Introduction Session Papers . 15 5.0 Documentation Session Papers . 29 6.0 Evaluation Session Papers . 53 7.0 Legacy of Ronald J. Thom Session Papers . 87 8.0 Stewardship Session Papers . 113 9.0 Conservation Session Papers . 173 10.0 Education Session Papers . 203 11.0 Tours . 239 i Conserving the Modern in Canada Conference Proceedings ii Conserving the Modern in Canada Conference Proceedings FOREWORD The “Conserving the Modern in Canada” conference, held at Trent University in Peterborough from May 6 to 8, 2005, was Canada’s first national conference on the subject of the built heritage of the 1950s, ‘60s, and ‘70s.
  • International Conference on Structural Reform and the Transformation of Organisations and Business

    International Conference on Structural Reform and the Transformation of Organisations and Business

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics International Conference on Structural Reform and the Transformation of Organisations and Business Homerton College, University of Cambridge, U.K September 3 –6, 2003 THE RELEVANCE OF TORONTO’S NEW GOVERMENTAL STRUCTURE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY By HARVEY SCHWARTZ York University 1 Introduction The government of Ontario has made a number of major changes in the way that municipalities are governed and financed. Some municipalities have been forced to amalgamate despite opposition from their residents. Ontario has also redistributed the responsibilities of the province and the municipalities through the Local Service Realignment Program (LSR). This program is referred to as downloading. Other major changes include the use of market value for property tax assessment and the transfer of education funding to the province from the local school boards. This paper is concerned with two aspects of the changes. The first question is whether megacities are less costly to operate than many small municipalities in a large urban area. The recent amalgamation of Toronto is used to examine this question. Since the amalgamation occurred in 1998, the new city is still adjusting to the change, and only preliminary conclusions can be drawn at this time. The second question is concerned with the impact of downloading on the municipalities. The experience of the new City of Toronto is again used to examine this question. 1 The Organization of Local Government Municipalities, their residents, the provincial governments and academics have been concerned with the costs and benefits of a megacity compared with many small and diverse municipalities within a large metropolitan area.
  • 10 City of Toronto Art Collection Management Policy and Historical

    10 City of Toronto Art Collection Management Policy and Historical

    CITY CLERK Clause embodied in Report No. 6 of the Economic Development and Parks Committee, as adopted by the Council of the City of Toronto at its meeting held on June 18, 19 and 20, 2002. 10 City of Toronto Art Collection Management Policy and Historical Collection Management and Development Policies (All Wards) (City Council on June 18, 19 and 20, 2002, amended this Clause by adding thereto the following: “It is further recommended that the following motion be referred to the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism for report thereon to the Economic Development and Parks Committee, such report to address the development of a strategy for ongoing enhancement of the City of Toronto’s art collection: Moved by Councillor Moscoe: ‘It is recommended that the City art collection apply for an annual major cultural grant approximately equivalent to grants provided to each of the “Big 5” cultural organizations, for the acquisition of art for the City of Toronto’s permanent art collection.’ ”) The Economic Development and Parks Committee recommends the adoption of the following report (May 6, 2002) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, subject to adding the following: “including opportunities for collaboration and co-operation with the Royal Ontario Museum and the Art Gallery of Ontario.”: Purpose: This report seeks approval for the City of Toronto Art Collection Management Policy, the Historical Collection Management Policy and the Historical Collection Development Policy. Financial Implications and Impact Statement: There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.
  • Conserving the Modern in Canada Buildings, Ensembles, and Sites: 1945-2005

    Conserving the Modern in Canada Buildings, Ensembles, and Sites: 1945-2005

    Conserving the Modern in Canada Buildings, ensembles, and sites: 1945-2005 Conference Proceedings Trent University, Peterborough, May 6-8, 2005 Editors: Susan Algie, Winnipeg Architecture Foundation James Ashby, Docomomo Canada-Ontario Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Conserving the Modern in Canada (2005: Trent University) Conserving the Modern in Canada: buildings, ensembles, and sites, 1945-2005: conference proceedings, Trent University, Peterborough, May 6-8, 2005 / editors: Susan Algie and James Ashby. Papers presented at the Conserving the Modern in Canada conference held at Trent University, Peterborough, Ont., May 6-8, 2005. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-9683100-5-2 1. Architecture--Conservation and restoration--Canada. 2. Historic sites--Conservation and restoration--Canada. 3. Architecture--Canada--20th century. 4. Historic preservation--Canada. I. Algie, Susan, 1951 II. Ashby, James, 1962 III. Winnipeg Architecture Foundation. NA109.C3C66 2007 363.6'90971 C2007-902448-3 Also available in French. / Aussi disponible en francais. Conserving the Modern in Canada Conference Proceedings Table of Contents 1.0 Foreword . 1 2.0 Acknowledgements . 3 3.0 Conference Programme . 9 4.0 Introduction Session Papers . 15 5.0 Documentation Session Papers . 29 6.0 Evaluation Session Papers . 53 7.0 Legacy of Ronald J. Thom Session Papers . 87 8.0 Stewardship Session Papers . 113 9.0 Conservation Session Papers . 173 10.0 Education Session Papers . 203 11.0 Tours . 239 i Conserving the Modern in Canada Conference Proceedings ii Conserving the Modern in Canada Conference Proceedings FOREWORD The “Conserving the Modern in Canada” conference, held at Trent University in Peterborough from May 6 to 8, 2005, was Canada’s first national conference on the subject of the built heritage of the 1950s, ‘60s, and ‘70s.
  • Rooming Houses in Toronto, 1997–2018

    Rooming Houses in Toronto, 1997–2018

    Rooming houses in Toronto, 1997–2018 Philippa Campsie Research Paper 242 April 2018 Funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada through the Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership www.neighbourhoodchange.ca ISSN 0316-0068; ISBN 978-0-7727-9128-3 Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership ii Rooming houses in Toronto, 1997– 2 0 1 8 Rooming houses in Toronto, 1997–2018 Philippa Campsie April 2018, vi, 81 pp. ISSN 0316-0068 ISBN 978-0-7727-9128-3 Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work University of Toronto 248 Bloor Street West Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1V4 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://neighbourhoodchange.ca This study and its dissemination is supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humani- ties Research Council of Canada which has funded the Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership based at the University of Toronto (J. David Hulchanski, Principal Investigator). The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the research team, the advisory board members, the university, or the funder. Neighbourhood Change Research Partnership Rooming houses in Toronto, 1997 – 2 0 1 8 iii Executive Summary In 1998, amalgamation brought together six cities to form the new City of Toronto. Rooming houses had been permitted and licensed since the 1970s in the former City of Toronto, which became the core of the amalgamated city. In the former cities of Etobicoke and York, they were permitted to some extent, but in the former cities of North York, East York, and Scarborough, rooming houses were not permitted.
  • A Preliminary Assessment of the New City of Toronto

    A Preliminary Assessment of the New City of Toronto

    A Preliminary Assessment of the New City of Toronto Enid Slack Enid Slack Consulting Inc. 214 King Street West, Suite 214 Toronto, ON M5H 3S6 On January 1, 1998, the new City of Toronto came into being by replacing the former metropolitan level of government and its constituent lower-tier munici- palities (Toronto, Etobicoke, North York, Scarborough, York and East York) with a single-tier city.1 This restructuring was not initiated by local initiative but by the provincial government through the passage of Bill 103, the City of To- ronto Act, 1996. 2 Indeed, opposition to the proposed amalgamation came from many different quarters: local municipalities (both inside and outside of Metro Toronto), the opposition parties, citizen organisations, and from within the Conservative party itself (see Stevenson and Gilbert 1999; Sancton 1998). The major citizen opposition was led by a former mayor of Toronto, John Sewell, who was behind the formation of the Citizens for Local Democracy in late 1996. Sewell’s opposition to amalgamation centred on the loss of local identity and 1. The new City of Tor onto is con tained within the G reate r To ron to Ar ea (G TA ) whic h is comprised of the City of Toronto plus the two-tier regions of Durham, Halton, Peel and York. The pop ulation of To ron to in 1999 was 2,385,421. The populations of the other regions of the GTA are: Durham -- 452,608; Halton -- 329,613; Peel -- 869,219; and York -- 618,497. These estimates, which were taken from the 1999 Ontario Municipal Directory, show that the population of Toronto represents about half of the population of the GTA.
  • The New Geography of Office Location and The

    The New Geography of Office Location and The

    Prepared by: Canadian Urban Institute The New Geography of Office Location 555 Richmond St. W., Suite 402, PO Box 612 and the Consequences of Toronto, ON M5V 3B1 Canada Business as Usual in the GTA 416-365-0816 416-365-0650 [email protected] This reportMarch has 2011 been prepared for the Toronto Office Coalition, March 18, 2011. http://www.canurb.org Research Team: Canadian Urban Institute Glenn R. Miller, Vice President, Education & Research, FCIP, RPP Iain Myrans, Senior Planner, MCIP, RPP Juan Carlos Molina, Geospatial Analyst, MSA Thomas Sullivan, GIS & Policy Analyst, B Sc Danielle Berger, GIS Research Assistant Mike Dror, GIS Research Assistant Real Estate Search Corporation Iain Dobson, Principal & Senior Associate, Canadian Urban Institute Hammersmith Communications Philippa Campsie, Principal & Senior Associate, Canadian Urban Institute All photography in this document by Iain Myrans. This report has been prepared for the Toronto Office Coalition, March 18, 2011. Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Recommendations.............................................................................................................. 7 1. Business Competitiveness in the GTA, Five Years On............................................................................. 9 2. Changes and trends since 2005 .............................................................................................................
  • DIVERCITIES: Dealing with Urban Diversity: the Case of Toronto

    DIVERCITIES: Dealing with Urban Diversity: the Case of Toronto

    DIVERCITIES Governing Urban Diversity: governing urban diversity Creating Social Cohesion, Social Mobility and Economic Performance in Today’s Hyper-diversified Cities Dealing with Urban Diversity Dealing with This book is one of the outcomes of the DIVERCITIES project. It focuses on the question of how to create social cohesion, social Urban Diversity • mobility and economic performance in today’s hyper-diversified cities. The Case of Toronto The Case of Toronto The project’s central hypothesis is that urban diversity is an asset; it can inspire creativity, innovation and make cities more liveable. There are fourteen books in this series: Antwerp, Athens, Budapest, Copenhagen, Istanbul, Leipzig, London, Milan, Tuna Tasan-Kok Paris, Rotterdam, Tallinn, Toronto, Warsaw and Zurich. Sara Ozogul This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under www.urbandivercities.eu grant agreement No. 319970. SSH.2012.2.2.2-1; Governance of cohesion and diversity in urban contexts. DIVERCITIES: Dealing with Urban Diversity The Case of Toronto Tuna Tasan-Kok Sara Ozogul Governing Urban Diversity: Creating Social Cohesion, Social Mobility and Economic Performance in Today’s Hyper-diversified Cities To be cited as: Tasan-Kok, T. and Ozogul, S. (2017). Lead Partner DIVERCITIES, Living with Urban Diversity: The case - Utrecht University, The Netherlands of Toronto. Amsterdam and Delft: University of Amsterdam and TU Delft. Consortium Partners This report has been put together by the authors, - University of Vienna, Austria and revised on the basis of the valuable comments, suggestions, and contributions of all DIVERCITIES - University of Antwerp, Belgium partners.
  • The Cases of Montreal and Toronto

    The Cases of Montreal and Toronto

    ARTICLE IN PRESS PROGRESS IN PLANNING Progress in Planning 66 (2006) 7–59 www.elsevier.com/locate/pplann Comparing metropolitan governance: The cases of Montreal and Toronto Julie-Anne Boudreau, Pierre HamelÃ, Bernard Jouve, Roger Keil Universite de Montreal Sociology, Pavillon Lionel-Groulx, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 3150 CHAPTER 1 Introduction The transformation of metropolitan governance cannot be understood without adopting a double reading frame referring on the one hand to the actual content of policies aimed at the metropolitan scale, their raison d’eˆtre, the macro-economic logics that underlie them, and on the other hand to the configurations of actors and institutions which evolved strongly in the last 20 years. Essentially, the metropolitan level, beyond the municipal, progressively became (and not without conflict or opposition) the new territory of reference for political leaders as well as for economic ones.1 Big cities bring pressures for a new configuration of intergovernmental relations. In this institutional and political flux, the main challenge of public policy-making is to stabilize a place for exchanges between institutions. There seem to be an emerging political space at the metropolitan scale, where collective action and claims for local democracy unfold. The recent reforms have created more and more organized local and metropolitan societies. Metropolitanization also means an internal reconstitu- tion of the political sphere and its articulation with civil society. There is a diversification of local and metropolitan responsibilities and activities, from the à Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 514 343 6423; fax: +1 514 343 5722. E-mail address: [email protected] (P. Hamel).