SPDC Data Book 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

SPDC Data Book 2015 Southside Planning District Commission Brunswick County - Halifax County - Mecklenburg County Town of South Boston - Town of South Hill NNING LA DI P ST E R ID IC S T H T X U I O I I S 19 69 C O A I M N M I G O R NW VI EALTH OF ii Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Demographics 5 Income and Wages 11 Retail Markets 15 Wholesale Trade 19 Employment 23 Labor Market Characteristics 27 Agriculture 31 Forestry 33 Tourism and Recreation 35 Education 45 Housing 53 Physical Resources 57 Infrastructure 67 Solid Waste Management 73 District Transportation Systems 75 Industrial and Commerce Parks 83 Broadband Connectivity 85 List of Changes 87 INTERACTIVE DATA SOURCES: Some figures display a plus sign icon in the upper-right corner. If you are using this book in PDF format, clicking on this icon will open a browser to a spreadsheet in Google Drive where you are able to copy, download, or work with the source data. Some of the linked spreadsheets only include source data, while others include historical data or related information. If you are using this book in print format, you can find the figures (as well as the PDF format for download) by going to www.southsidepdc.org and choosing “Data/Census”, then “SPDC Data Book” iii iv Executive Summary The Southside Planning District has embarked on a journey to formulate fundamental decisions that will shape growth and development in the region. These decisions are being made with deliberation and care in view of the fact that the District’s economic role, the character of its environment, and its quality of life will be determined, in major part, by these choices. The Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy provides a basic foundation for making choices wisely. Strategies and decisions are evaluat- ed and adjusted on a continuous basis as unknown and unexpected factors are encountered. This data resource provides a foundation for the goals, objectives, and reccomendations set forth in the CEDS. Southside Planning District, located in the Piedmont region of Virginia along the North Carolina border, encompasses more than 2,000 square miles and three counties—Brunswick, Mecklenburg and Halifax. Much of Lake Gaston and John H. Kerr Reservoir are located within these counties and therefore the area is often called “Lake Country.” Figure 1: The Southside Planning District RICHMOND I¥ BUCKINGHAM COUNTY ± Ir CUMBER- LAND LYNCHBURG COUNTY Kß KÕ Appomattox AMELIA CHESTERFIELD COUNTY COUNTY APPOMATTOX COLONIAL Kâ COUNTY Kâ HEIGHTS PRINCE Farmville IÌ EDWARD COUNTY NOTTOWAY CAMPBELL COUNTY COUNTY Burkeville Crewe Kâ PETERSBURG Altavista CHARLOTTE Blackstone COUNTY DINWIDDIE !"d$ Phenix COUNTY Brookneal Io Hurt Keysville I¥ Charlotte CH Kß Victoria McKenney Gretna IÌ Drakes Branch Kenbridge HALIFAX LUNENBURG COUNTY COUNTY Iq Alberta Chatham Chase !"d$ Kß City Jarratt PITTSYLVANIA Halifax I« COUNTY South EMPORIA Scottsburg MECKLENBURG Hill La Crosse Lawrenceville South COUNTY Boston Ix Boydton I« Brodnax BRUNSWICK I« COUNTY GREENSVILLE Clarksville COUNTY DANVILLE Iq VA VA Virgilina Lake Gaston NC Gaston Milton NC Ir Buggs Island Lake Seaboard PERSON ROANOKE COUNTY RAPIDS IÌ VANCE Norlina Stovall COUNTY !"d$ Macon K² Yanceyville K² Garysburg Roxboro Middleburg Littleton Weldon NORTH- K² GRANVILLE Warrenton AMPTON COUNTY HENDERSON COUNTY CASWELL WARREN HALIFAX Halifax COUNTY COUNTY COUNTY Oxford KÆ KÂ Stem Kittrell !"d$ Centerville Enfield ORANGE Ir FRANKLIN Mebane COUNTY COUNTY IÌ Franklinton Louisburg NASH CO. I§ Hillsborough Red Whitakers Creedmoor Io Oak !"_$ DURHAM !"d$ Castalia Dortches SPDC Map #10672 Rocky Mount Source: Southside Planning District Commission !"d$ Dortches Rocky Mount 1 Executive Summary While the Planning Area counties are rural, they are in excellent proximity to large regional markets and have an outstanding transportation system, which includes an Interstate, U.S. highways, several municipal airports, and one regional airport. The region has an abundance of resources including edu- cational facilities, industrial and residential sites, medical services, outdoor recreational facilities and six lakes: Banister Lake, Gordon Lake, Great Creek Reservoir, Kerr Reservoir/Buggs Island Lake, Lake Connor, and Lake Gaston These resources enhance the area’s competitive advantage as an attractor of people and business. In 2010, 86,402 persons were residing in Southside Planning District, which was a decrease of 2 percent since the 2000 Census. The estimated July 2013 total population is 83,800 (from Census Bureau). The population centers are the twelve incorporated towns and the housing developments around the lakes. The 2010 Decennial Census indicated that 24% of the region’s residents lived within the incorporated limits of a town (unchanged compared to 2000). Throughout the District per capita personal income levels continue to remain below state and federal levels (and slightly decreasing over the past several years). While we find lower income and wages in Southside it is also evident that the lower cost of living increases local spending power. An assessment of the labor market in the Planning District revealed disparity in the employment sectors. The VEC Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages indicates the region is underrepresented in most service-providing sectors with the exception of Education and Health Services, both of which ex- ceeded the state’s relative share. The Agricultural sector and Goods Producing Sector is also higher than the state average.. The PDC’s employment percentage exceeded the state’s in Agriculture, Utili- ties, Construction, Manufacturing, Retail Trade, Transportation/Warehousing, Educational Services, and Healthcare/Social Assistance. Figure 2: Second Quarter 2014 Employment by Industrial Sector, as a percentage of overall employment (SPDC vs Va.) 20% Retail Trade Mining Utilities Services & Social Assistance Information Educational Professional Construction Warehousing 15% & Enterprises Manufacturing Food Services Other Services, Waste Services Waste & Entertainment Administrative & Accomodation & Transportation & Transportation Arts, Recreation, Wholesale Trade exc. Public Admin. Finance & Insurance & Technical Services & Technical Public Administration SPDC Healthcare 10% Virginia Management of Companies Real Estate, Rentals, & Leasing Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, Hunting Agriculture, Forestry, 5% Source: Virginia Employment Commission, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. Downloaded 2/23/15 For decades, even centuries, the economic structure of the District has revolved around agriculture with tobacco being the principal crop. However, in 2004 Congress approved the Tobacco Buyout Bill, which eliminates tobacco market quotas and price supports. The buyout payments, over a period of 10 years, provide an infusion of capital into state and local economies, which are intended to assist farmers and other affected parties to move away from tobacco crops as a source of income. As a result many of the region’s small operators shifted away from tobacco in favor of other crops or retirement from farming. In Virginia, an economic model projects that over the 10 years; the buyout will have had a total economic activity impact of $605 million. After an initial reduction, the acres of tobacco grown in Southside have increased steadily. 2 Executive Summary Other factors have been affecting the number of small farms, which have been steadily decreasing. During the fifties, sixties and seventies, many textile manufacturers built businesses in Southside Vir- ginia, benefiting from readily available labor exiting the farms. As the textile sector grew, the area’s economy developed a dependence upon this industry. With the passing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994, the region began experiencing another severe economic blow. In- dustries have been attracted by the cheap labor in Mexico and overseas, and thousands of jobs have been lost. Between 1999 and 2013, the available labor force has shrunk by over 6,500 workers. Over that time, approximately 4,000 jobs have been lost; of these approximately1,600 were in the textile/ apparel sector, thus presenting another challenge to the economic stability of the region. These losses were counteracted by 2,000 new jobs in a variety of employment sectors. Figure 3: 1990 - 2013 SPDC Annual Unemployment Rate and Civilian Labor Force 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 20082009 2010 20112012 2013 12.2% 41,099 L AB 10.9% 41,064 11.5% 40,584 O R FORCE 40,579 40,252 40,142 40,064 9.8% 9.5% 9.5% 9.8% 41,047 39,376 9.2% 9.6% 8.8% T 39,670 N E M 8.1% Y O L P M 7.4% 37,841 37,971 7.2% NE 7.0% 6.8% U 37,068 6.4% 37,233 6.7% 36,760 37,594 5.9% 6.4% 36,131 5.6% 35,225 35,958 5.4% 5.6% 36,315 35,788 35,573 5.4% 35,748 34,517 4.1% Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics (delivered through VEC), Obtained 2/20/15 After the employment picture began to finally stabilize in the mid 2000’s, the 2007-10 recession pushed the numbers of the unemployed up to historic levels. In February of 2010, the Planning District’s un- employment rate was 13.1%. The most recent unemployment rate is 7.3%, from December 2014. This was the highest rate of any Planning District in the state of Virginia. (The next highest rate is 7.2% from Cumberland Plateau PDC.) As traditional manufacturing and agricultural jobs disappear, new types of industries are expanding. Steps need to be taken to ensure the Planning District’s plentiful labor force is properly trained to take advantage of these new opportunities. The infrastructure necessary to attract these industries must also be available. In this age of new technology, industrial parks must now offer high-speed commu- nications capabilities in addition to water, sewer, natural gas and a good road network. Additionally, tourism, or marketing to “get the word out” about the region figures prominently in any economic devel- opment strategy.
Recommended publications
  • South Boston 2021 Comp Plan

    South Boston 2021 Comp Plan

    Comprehensive Plan 2040 Progress and Preservation on the Dan Adopted Comprehensive Plan 2040 Progress and Preservation on the Dan 2 Comprehensive Plan 2040 Progress and Preservation on the Dan South Boston Planning Commission George Leonard (Chair) Fields Thomas (Vice-chair) Ken Buckley Harriet Claiborne Beverly Crowder Sharon Harris (Town Council Representative) James Landrum, Jr. South Boston Town Council Edward Owens (Mayor) Robert Hughes (Vice-Mayor) Joe Chandler Thomas Elliott Winston Harrell Sharon Harris W. R. Snead South Boston Town Manager Thomas Raab Assisting Consultants Revised by: The Town of South Boston 3 Comprehensive Plan 2040 Progress and Preservation on the Dan 4 Comprehensive Plan 2040 Progress and Preservation on the Dan Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 9 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 11 II. COMMUNITY VISION AND GOALS ...................................................................................... 15 A VISION FOR THE FUTURE ............................................................................................................... 15 COMMUNITY GOALS ......................................................................................................................... 15 Environment .................................................................................................................................
  • JOURNAL of the VIRGINIA SOCIETY of ORNITHOLOGY Volume 83 Number 1 2012 the Virginia Society of Ornithology, Inc

    JOURNAL of the VIRGINIA SOCIETY of ORNITHOLOGY Volume 83 Number 1 2012 the Virginia Society of Ornithology, Inc

    The Raven JOURNAL OF THE VIRGINIA SOCIETY OF ORNITHOLOGY Volume 83 Number 1 2012 The Virginia Society of Ornithology, Inc. exists to encourage the systematic study of birds in Virginia, to stimulate interest in birds, and to assist the conservation of wildlife and other natural resources. All persons interested in those objectives are welcome as members. Present membership includes every level of interest, from professional scientific ornithologists to enthusiastic amateurs. Activities undertaken by the Society include the following: 1. An annual meeting (usually in the spring), held in a different part of the state each year, featuring talks on ornithological subjects and field trips to nearby areas. 2. Other forays or field trips lasting a day or more and scheduled throughout the year so as to include all seasons and to cover the major physiographic regions of the state. 3. A journal, The Raven, published twice yearly, containing articles relevant to Virginia ornithology as well as news of the activities of the Society and its chapters. 4. A newsletter, the VSO Newsletter, published quarterly, containing current news items of interest to members and information about upcoming events and pertinent conservation issues. 5. Study projects (nesting studies, winter bird population surveys, etc.) aimed at making genuine contributions to ornithological knowledge. In addition, some local chapters of the Society conduct their own programs of meetings, field trips and other projects. Those wishing to participate in any of the above activities, or to cooperate in advancing the objectives of the Society, are cordially invited to join and should contact Thelma Dalmas, the Membership Secretary.
  • Banister Scenic River Report Halifax County

    Banister Scenic River Report Halifax County

    Banister Scenic River Report Halifax County Prepared By Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Planning and Recreation Resources December 2012 Table of Contents I. REASON FOR THE STUDY .......................................................................... 3 A. Benefits of Designation ....................................................... 3 B. Designation Process ............................................................ 3 II. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ............................................................................. 4 III. CORRIDOR STUDY MAP .............................................................................. 5 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS .................................................................... 6 A. River Corridor Vegetation ................................................... 6 B. Riverbed and/or River Flow Modifications ...................... 10 C. Human Development of Visual Corridor .......................... 10 D. Historic Features ................................................................ 11 E. Landscape.......................................................................... 13 F. Quality of Fishery ............................................................. 13 G. Special Natural Fauna ....................................................... 15 H. Water Quality ................................................................... 115 I. Parallel Roads ................................................................... 16 J. Crossings ..........................................................................
  • DEQ Office of Water Supply Update

    DEQ Office of Water Supply Update

    March 2017 Update Virginia's Phase III Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Update: Local Engagement Program for the Chesapeake Bay Clean Up In light of the strong emphasis on local engagement for the Phase III WIP, Virginia has developed and begun implementing a local engagement program that will continue throughout the Phase III WIP development process and beyond. The components of the local engagement program include: . Ongoing meetings of the Chesapeake Bay Stakeholder Advisory Group (SAG). This group is comprised of representatives of the agricultural, conservation, development and industrial communities as well as representatives of local governments and soil & water quality conservation districts. The state will be providing updates to this group and eliciting their comments on all aspects of Phase III WIP planning, including the local engagement program. Outreach to local government, soil & water conservation district and stakeholder association meetings to provide continuous updates throughout the Phase III WIP process. Initial regional outreach meetings to local governments and soil & water conservation districts throughout the Chesapeake Bay Watershed portion of the state (currently on-going). Facilitated work sessions for local governments, soil & water conservation districts and stakeholders. These work sessions will involve training on the various tools available for the development and prioritization of pollutant reducing strategies and how to report Best Management Practices (BMPs). On-going assistance to local governments and stakeholders and outreach. For more information, visit the webpage below or contact Joan Salvati at [email protected],(804) 698- 4230. http://www.deq.virginia.gov/Programs/Water/ChesapeakeBay/ChesapeakeBayTMDL.aspx DEQ Office of Water Supply Update: Virginia Water Withdrawal Reporting Regulation: DEQ appreciates the assistance of the VASWCD and Districts as we continue to register farms to report water withdrawals.
  • 2007 the Virginia Society of Ornithology, Inc

    2007 the Virginia Society of Ornithology, Inc

    The Raven JOURNAL OF THE VIRGINIA SOCIETY OF ORNITHOLOGY Volume 78 Number 1 2007 The Virginia Society of Ornithology, Inc. exists to encourage the systematic study of birds in Virginia, to stimulate interest in birds, and to assist the conservation of wildlife and other natural resources. All persons interested in those objectives are welcome as members. Present membership includes every level of interest, from professional scientific ornithologists to enthusiastic amateurs. Activities undertaken by the Society include the following: 1. An annual meeting (usually in the spring), held in a different part of the state each year, featuring talks on ornithological subjects and field trips to nearby areas. 2. Other forays or field trips lasting a day or more and scheduled throughout the year so as to include all seasons and to cover the major physiographic regions of the state. 3. A journal, The Raven, published twice yearly, containing articles relevant to Virginia ornithology, as well as news of the activities of the Society and its chapters. 4. A newsletter, published quarterly, containing current news items of interest to members and information about upcoming events and pertinent conservation issues. 5. Study projects (nesting studies, winter bird population surveys, etc.) aimed at making genuine contributions to ornithological knowledge. In additions, local chapters of the Society, located in some of the larger cities and towns of Virginia, conduct their own programs of meetings, field trips and other projects. Those wishing to participate in any of the above activities, or to cooperate in advancing the objectives of the Society, are cordially invited to join.
  • On the Record Governor Mcdonnell: “If It Can with Stewart East Be Done Safely Then I’M All for It.”

    On the Record Governor Mcdonnell: “If It Can with Stewart East Be Done Safely Then I’M All for It.”

    Fuel for America. Jobs for Virginia. i www.virginiauranium.com i Summer 2011 On the Record Governor McDonnell: “If it can With Stewart East be done safely then I’m all for it.” Stewart East is a geologic technician Governor Bob McDonnell has publicly endorsed with Virginia Uranium, Inc., and a life- the idea that if uranium mining can be done long resident of the Sheva community. safely in Virginia, it should be done. McDonnell, My wife and I were both born and who was elected to office on a ‘Bob’s for Jobs’ raised within a few miles of the Coles campaign platform, stated in a July radio Hill uranium deposit. It’s a dream interview, “It will be a tremendous number of jobs, come true to be able to use skills I tax revenues and opportunities to support the have developed during my education nuclear industry.” The Governor is awaiting the and work experiences elsewhere right here at home. Four generations results of the National Academy of Sciences study of my family have worked the land on the safety of uranium mining in Southside in the Sheva area raising tobacco. Virginia, and notes that the state stands “to gain My father and I still raise beef cattle a lot by a safe and vibrant nuclear industry.” on the same land. My wife and I recently bought a home next to this property, where we now live with our The Virginia Beach Water Study: four-year-old son. I cannot convey how much the farming lifestyle and Fatally Flawed this land mean to me, my family, and A recent analysis by Kleinfelder – an environmental engineering firm – found that my neighbors.
  • TNW Report.Pdf

    TNW Report.Pdf

    ARCHEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL DETERMINATION OF TRADITIONALLY NAVIGABLE WATERS IN NORTHERN VIRGINIA AND A COMPREHENSIVE METHODOLOGY FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE TRADITIONAL NAVIGABILITY OF WATERWAYS IN THE UNITED STATES Goose Creek Canal, Loudoun County Virginia William P. Barse, Ph.D. and Boyd Sipe July 2007 5300 Wellington Branch Drive • Suite 100 • Gainesville, VA 20155 • Phone 703.679.5600 • Fax 703.679.5601 www.wetlandstudies.com A Division of Wetland Studies and Solutions, Inc. ABSTRACT This document presents the results of an archival and documentary study on the Traditional Navigability of Waterways in Northern Virginia. The study area is depicted in Attachment 1 of this report and is roughly bounded by the Potomac River on the north and east, the Opequon Creek watershed on the west and the Rappahannock River watershed on the south. The study was conducted by Thunderbird Archeology, a division of Wetland Studies and Solutions, Inc. of Gainesville, Virginia. The purposes of this work are threefold. The primary purpose is to assist consultants and regulators in completing Section III of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Approved Jurisdictional Form. In order to accomplish this goal, a working definition of what constitutes Traditional Navigable Waterways was prepared. This definition will aid in the determination of Waters of the United States jurisdiction for the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers within the study area. Secondly, using specific archeological and historical information, the paper demonstrates that certain rivers and streams can be identifiable as Traditional Navigable Waterways. It is also possible to consider the use of streams for recreation, e.g.
  • Historic Architectural Resources Survey of Halifax County, Virginia

    Historic Architectural Resources Survey of Halifax County, Virginia

    HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF HALIFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA Prepared by: MAAR Associates, Inc. Hill Studio, P.C. P.O. Box 655 120 West Campbell Avenue Newark, DE 19715 Roanoke, Virginia 540-342-5263 May 2004 July 2008 With contributions by: Ronald A. Thomas, M.A., Project Manager, Principal Investigator and Kim Chen Prepared for: Virginia Department Halifax County of Historic Resources 134 South Main Street 2801 Kensington Avenue Halifax, Virginia Richmond, Virginia 23221 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................................................ i Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................... ii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Purpose and Survey Goals .................................................................................. 1 1.2 Survey Coverage and Study Area ................................................................................... 1 1.3 Survey Methodology ....................................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 Background Research ............................................................................................. 5 1.3.2 On-Site Survey ........................................................................................................ 5
  • Virginia Birds a Quarterly Journal of Ornithological Sightings in the Commonwealth Published by the Virginia Society of Ornithology

    Virginia Birds a Quarterly Journal of Ornithological Sightings in the Commonwealth Published by the Virginia Society of Ornithology

    Virginia Birds A quarterly journal of ornithological sightings in the Commonwealth published by the Virginia Society of Ornithology Volume 11 Number 3 Winter Records Dec 2014–Feb 2015 Virginia Birds Regions Cities/towns numbered on map 1. Abingdon 18. Fredericksburg 32. Poquoson 42. Virginia Beach 2. Alexandria 19. Galax 33. Portsmouth 43. Waynesboro 3. Bedford 20. Hampton 34. Radford 44. Williamsburg 45 Frederick 4. Bristol 21. Harrisonburg 35. Richmond 45. Winchester Clarke Loudoun 5. Buena Vista 22. Hopewell 36. Roanoke North Fairfax Arlington 6. Cape Charles 23. Lexington 37. Salem Warren Fauquier 15,16 Shenandoah 25, 26 7. Charlottesville 24. Lynchburg 38. South Boston Rappahannock Prince 2 Page William 8. Chesapeake 25. Manassas 39. Staunton Madison Culpeper Rockingham 9. Chincoteague 26. Manassas Park 40. Suffolk 21 Stafford King 10. Clifton Forge 27. Martinsville 41. Tazewell Highland Greene George Augusta Orange 18 11. Colonial Heights 28. Newport News 39 Spotsylvania Westmoreland 12. Covington 29. Norfolk Bath 43 7 Caroline Richmond West Albemarle Central Essex East 9 Louisa King and Queen Northumberland 13. Danville 30. Norton 12 Rockbridge King William 10 Nelson Hanover Lancaster 14. Emporia 31. Petersburg Alleghany 23 FluvannaGoochland 5 Middlesex 15. Fairfax Amherst Buckingham Henrico Accomack Botetourt Powhatan New 16. Falls Church Gloucester Craig Appomattox 35 Kent Mathews Bedford Chesterfield Charles James 17. Franklin Cumberland Giles Roanoke 24 Amelia 22 City City 44 Buchanan 3 Prince York 6 Montgomery37 36 Campbell
  • RICHMOND the People, the History, the Issues That Shape a City

    RICHMOND the People, the History, the Issues That Shape a City

    The magazine of the Virginia Municipal League VOL. 50 NO. 8 OCTOBER 2015 RICHMOND The people, the history, the issues that shape a city Inside: 2015 Achievement Award Winners The magazine of the Virginia Municipal League VOL. 50 NO. 8 OCTOBER 2015 About the cover The city and the river aren’t worlds apart in Richmond, but woven together. Offices, shops and restaurants overlook the river where kayakers and paddleboarders glide along the banks of downtown Richmond. Departments Discovering Virginia ............... 2 Professional Directory ......... 24 Virginia Municipal League Features 2015 Annual Report After a very busy and very productive year of representing the Welcome to Richmond interests of local government, the Virginia Municipal League The host city for this year’s annual conference is a community pauses to reflect on its many accomplishments. From the state that is learning to embrace its past and confront current social capitol in Richmond to the halls of Congress in Washington, and economic challenges head on. Richmond is fast becom- VML and its member local governments continue to be an ing a mecca for the arts, cuisine, outdoor adventure, sporting essential voice in the debates surrounding some of the most events and more. The population is on the rise and entrepre- important public policy issues of the times. neurs are finding a warm welcome. Pages 20-34 Pages 5-11 A look back at the past year includes: Announcing the winners A message from the President .............................................20 of the 2015 VML VML Executive Committee ..................................................21 Achievement Awards The Executive Director’s summary .......................................23 Reports from affiliate organizations From Halifax to Marion to Virginia VLGMA ...........................................................................27 Beach, our winners represent cities and VBCOA ...........................................................................27 town of all sizes across the state.
  • See Sizemore Legend and Fact by Ron Blevins

    See Sizemore Legend and Fact by Ron Blevins

    SIZEMORE LEGEND AND FACT I N T R O D U C T I O N A Discussion Paper Excerpted From INDIAN NED SIZEMORE THE LEGEND AND THE LEGACY Disclaimer: Contents of this document include my original research ONLY on the George Sizemore family of Ashe County, NC. All other information is my interpretation of the research of others shared with me during 28 years of correspondence. Readers are cautioned to use this information only as a starting point for doing their own primary research to develop a family tree. Ron Blevins 4250 Mockingbird CT West Point, VA 23181 email [email protected] First issuance: September, 1998 1st Revision with input from Frances Sizemore: October, 1998 2nd Revision March, 1999 3rd Revision July, 1999 HELPFUL HINTS ON HOW TO READ THIS DISCUSSION PAPER: NUMBERING SYSTEM This document is organized such that it uses a sequential numbering system to provide easy tracing of family members from generation to generation. The + symbol beside the number given for a child indicates that further information on that individual appears under the heading of that number later in the document, or that the writer has more information on that person in my files accumulated over the past 28 years. In those instances where a child is listed without the + symbol, I have no additional information on that individual. I would welcome communication from others who are seeking to research and preserve the Sizemore family heritage. ABBREVIATIONS / EXPLANATIONS: ca. = about, i.e. ca.1775 means about 1775 m. = married b. = born d. = died ECA = Eastern Cherokee Application, i.e.
  • Appendix B – Projects by District

    Appendix B – Projects by District

    THE VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION APPENDIX B – PROJECTS BY DISTRICT 2018 - 2023 WORKING DRAFT Commonwealth Transportation Board Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation 05/17/2017 555 This Page Is Intentionally Left Blank 556 05/17/2017 FY2018-2023 Six-Year Improvement Program Appendix B - Projects by District FY18 DRAFT ($ in thousands) Appendix B - Projects by District Bristol Interstate (sorted by district, system, route, jurisdiction) Route Jurisdiction UPC Project Description Budget Total Funds 0077 098 - Wythe County 103320 #HB2.FY17 Add merging lane on I-77N in Ft. Chiswell $8,300 $9,100 0077 098 - Wythe County 109512 I-77 Wythe Co. Median Barrier $925 $925 0081 086 - Smyth County 97555 I-81 NBL BRIDGE PROJECT AT ROUTE 11 STR #17478 $13,320 $13,820 0081 086 - Smyth County 107117 #SGR I-81 STRUCTURES 17470 & 17472 OVER RTE. 686 $14,200 $14,200 0081 086 - Smyth County 109920 I-81 Shoulder Improvements - Smyth Co. $1,765 $15 0081 095 - Washington 97856 INTERSTATE 81 AT EXIT 14 RAMP MODIFICATIONS $42,700 $42,700 County 0081 095 - Washington 109440 #HB2.FY17 I-81 Exit 19 Ramp Improvements $9,736 $9,736 County 0081 098 - Wythe County 104936 #SGR I-81 Structures 19596 & 19597 over Reed Creek in Wythe $23,500 $23,500 0081 098 - Wythe County 108946 Extend accel. lane (exit 72) to decel lane (exit 73) $2,000 $700 0081 M02 - Multi- 109419 #HB2.FY17 I-81 at State Route 75 (Exit 17) Interchange Mod. $21,200 $21,200 jurisdictional: Bristol MPO 0081 M02 - Multi- 110380 #HB2.FY17 I-81 AT RT 75 (Exit