DOCSLIB.ORG

FSC Canada National Risk Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FSC Canada National Risk Assessment FSC National Risk Assessment For Canada DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE FSC-PRO-60-002 V3-0 Version V2-1 Code FSC-NRA-CA V2-1 National Approval National Decision Body: FSC Canada Board of Directors Date: October 03, 2019 International Approval FSC International Center: Performance and Standards Unit Date: November 05, 2019 (updated 31 July 2020) International Contact FSC International Center: Performance and Standards Unit [email protected] Period of Validity November 05, 2019 + 5 years Body Responsible for NRA FSC Canada Maintenance Vivian Peachey, Director of Standards [email protected] FSC-NRA-CA V2-1 NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CANADA 2020 – 1 of 162 – Contents Summary of Risk ............................................................................................................................... 3 Preamble ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Controlled Wood Category 1: Illegally Harvested Wood ............................................................... 10 Overview ............................................................................................................................................................ 10 Sources of Legal Timber in Canada .................................................................................................................. 11 Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................................................... 12 Control Measures .............................................................................................................................................. 48 Controlled Wood Category 2: Wood harvested in violation of traditional and human rights .... 49 Overview ............................................................................................................................................................ 49 Category 2 Summary of Risk Assessment ........................................................................................................ 51 Control Measures .............................................................................................................................................. 51 Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................................................... 53 General Information Sources ......................................................................................................................................... 53 Indicator 2.1 Sources of Information and Detailed Analysis ........................................................................................... 56 Indicator 2.2 Sources of Information and Detailed Analysis ........................................................................................... 58 Indicator 2.3 Sources of Information and Detailed Analysis ........................................................................................... 67 Controlled Wood Category 3: Wood from forests in which high conservation values are threatened by management activities ............................................................................................ 80 Overview ............................................................................................................................................................ 80 Summary of the Risk Assessment for Category 3 ............................................................................................ 86 Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................................................... 88 Indicator 3.1 – HCV 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 89 Indicator 3.2 – HCV 2 ..................................................................................................................................................... 96 Indicator 3.3 – HCV 3 ..................................................................................................................................................... 98 Indicator 3.4 – HCV 4 ..................................................................................................................................................... 99 Indicator 3.5 – HCV 5 ................................................................................................................................................... 110 Indicator 3.6 – HCV 6 ................................................................................................................................................... 119 Control Measures ............................................................................................................................................ 123 References & Information Sources ................................................................................................................. 130 Experts Contacted ........................................................................................................................................................ 130 National Level Data Sources Common to All Provinces and Territories ....................................................................... 132 Provincial Information Sources..................................................................................................................................... 136 Appendix I: Map of Canada’s Terrestrial Ecoregions ...................................................................................... 144 Appendix II: Forested Ecoregions in Canada - Scientific Codes .................................................................... 145 Appendix III: Map of Specified Risk IFLs ........................................................................................................ 146 Controlled Wood Category 4: Wood from forests being converted to plantations or non-forest use .................................................................................................................................................. 147 Overview .......................................................................................................................................................... 147 Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................................................. 148 Control Measures ............................................................................................................................................ 154 Experts Contacted ........................................................................................................................................... 155 Controlled Wood Category 5: Wood from forests in which genetically modified trees are planted............................................................................................................................................ 156 Overview .......................................................................................................................................................... 156 Risk Assessment ............................................................................................................................................. 157 Control Measures ............................................................................................................................................ 161 Update and Revision History ........................................................................................................ 162 1. Updates .................................................................................................................................................... 162 2. Revisions ................................................................................................................................................. 162 FSC-NRA-CA V2-1 NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CANADA 2020 – 2 of 162 – Summary of Risk Indicator Risk Designation Category 1: Illegally harvested wood 1.1 Low Risk for Canada 1.2 Low Risk for Canada 1.3 Low Risk for Canada 1.4 Low Risk for Canada 1.5 Low Risk for Canada 1.6 Low Risk for Canada 1.7 Low Risk for Canada 1.8 Low Risk for Canada 1.9 Low Risk for Canada 1.10 Low Risk for Canada 1.11 Low Risk for Canada 1.12 Low Risk for Canada 1.13 Low Risk for Canada 1.14 Low Risk for Canada 1.15 Low Risk for Canada 1.16 Low Risk for Canada 1.17 Low Risk for Canada 1.18 Low Risk for Canada 1.19 Low Risk for Canada 1.20 Low Risk for Canada 1.21 Low Risk for Canada Category 2: Wood harvested in violation of traditional and human rights 2.1 Low Risk for Canada 2.2 Low Risk for Canada 2.3 Specified Risk for Canada Category 3: Wood from forests where high conservation values are threatened by management activities 3.0 Low Risk for Canada 3.1 Specified Risk for the following ecoregions: • Southern Great Lakes forest • Eastern Great Lake lowland forest • Central Pacific coastal forest • Eastern Canadian forest • New England Acadian forest • Puget Lowland forest • Eastern Canadian Shield taiga • Central Canadian Shield forests • Eastern forest-boreal transition • Midwestern Canadian Shield forest • Mid-Continental Canadian forests • Southern Hudson Bay taiga • Northern Canadian Shield taiga • Canadian Aspen forests and parklands
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Discovery Park
    Final Vegetation Management Plan Discovery Park Prepared for: Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation Seattle, Washington Prepared by: Bellevue, Washington March 5, 2002 Final Vegetation Management Plan Discovery Park Prepared for: Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation 100 Dexter Seattle, Washington 98109 Prepared by: 11820 Northup Way, Suite E300 Bellevue, Washington 98005-1946 425/822-1077 March 5, 2002 This document should be cited as: Jones & Stokes. 2001. Discovery Park. Final Vegetation Management Plan. March 5. (J&S 01383.01.) Bellevue, WA. Prepared for Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation, Seattle, WA. Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND APPROACH........................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Approach .......................................................................................................................2 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND RECENT VEGETATION STUDIES ........................................3 2.1 A Brief Natural History of Discovery Park .........................................................................3 2.2 2001 Vegetation Inventory ...............................................................................................4 2.3 Results of Vegetation Inventory ........................................................................................4 2.3.1 Definitions ......................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Competing in a Global Innovation Economy: the Current State of R&D
    COMPETING IN A GLOBAL INNOVATION ECONOMY: THE CURRENT STATE OF R&D IN CANADA Expert Panel on the State of Science and Technology and Industrial Research and Development in Canada Science Advice in the Public Interest COMPETING IN A GLOBAL INNOVATION ECONOMY: THE CURRENT STATE OF R&D IN CANADA Expert Panel on the State of Science and Technology and Industrial Research and Development in Canada ii Competing in a Global Innovation Economy: The Current State of R&D in Canada THE COUNCIL OF CANADIAN ACADEMIES 180 Elgin Street, Suite 1401, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2P 2K3 Notice: The project that is the subject of this report was undertaken with the approval of the Board of Directors of the Council of Canadian Academies (CCA). Board members are drawn from the Royal Society of Canada (RSC), the Canadian Academy of Engineering (CAE), and the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS), as well as from the general public. The members of the expert panel responsible for the report were selected by the CCA for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance. This report was prepared for the Government of Canada in response to a request from the Minister of Science. Any opinions, findings, or conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors, the Expert Panel on the State of Science and Technology and Industrial Research and Development in Canada, and do not necessarily represent the views of their organizations of affiliation or employment, or the sponsoring organization, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Council of Canadian Academies.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the North American Labour Market © Oecd 2016 5
    THE STATE OF THE NORTH AMERICAN LABOUR MARKET Report Prepared for the 2016 North American Leaders Summit June 2016 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Common Trends And Challenges ............................................................................................. 9 How North America has weathered the crisis ............................................................................................ 10 Long-term challenges................................................................................................................................. 11 Chapter 2 Canada’s Labour Market: Challenges And Prospects ........................................................... 20 How has the labour market weathered the crisis? ...................................................................................... 20 Preparing for the future: Strengthening labour utilisation, job quality and investments in skills .............. 23 Chapter 3 Mexico’s Labour Market: Challenges And Prospects ............................................................ 35 How has the labour market weathered the crisis? ...................................................................................... 35 Preparing for the future: Strengthening labour utilisation, job quality and investments in skills .............. 38 Chapter 4 The United States Labour Market: Challenges And Prospects .............................................. 51 How has the labour market weathered the crisis? .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Commercial Marine Shipping to Canada
    THE VALUE OF COMMERCIAL MARINE SHIPPING TO CANADA The Expert Panel on the Social and Economic Value of Marine Shipping to Canada Science Advice in the Public Interest THE VALUE OF COMMERCIAL MARINE SHIPPING TO CANADA The Expert Panel on the Social and Economic Value of Marine Shipping to Canada ii The Value of Commercial Marine Shipping to Canada THE COUNCIL OF CANADIAN ACADEMIES 180 Elgin Street, Suite 1401, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2P 2K3 Notice: The project that is the subject of this report was undertaken with the approval of the Board of Governors of the Council of Canadian Academies (CCA). Board members are drawn from the Royal Society of Canada (RSC), the Canadian Academy of Engineering (CAE), and the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (CAHS), as well as from the general public. The members of the expert panel responsible for the report were selected by the CCA for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance. This report was prepared for the Clear Seas Centre for Responsible Marine Shipping (Clear Seas). Any opinions, findings, or conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors, the Expert Panel on the Social and Economic Value of Marine Shipping to Canada, and do not necessarily represent the views of their organizations of affiliation or employment or the sponsoring organization, Clear Seas. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Council of Canadian Academies. Expert Panel on the Social and Economic Value of Marine Shipping in Canada, author The value of commercial marine shipping to Canada / The Expert Panel on the Social and Economic Value of Marine Shipping in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheasty Greenspace Vegetation Management Plan
    Cheasty Greenspace Vegetation Management Plan Prepared For: City of Seattle Department of Parks & Recreation 1600 South Dakota Street Seattle, WA 98108-1546 Prepared By: 5031 University Way NE #204 Seattle, WA 98105 206.522.1214 July 2003 Cheasty Greenspace Vegetation Management Plan Prepared For: City of Seattle Department of Parks & Recreation 1600 South Dakota Street Seattle, WA 98108-1546 Prepared By: Marcia Fischer, Restoration Designer Kim Harper, Senior Wetland Ecologist Kevin O’Brien, Wildlife Biologist Sheldon & Associates Inc. 5031 University Way NE #204 Seattle, WA 98105 206.522.1214 July 2003 Acknowledgements Thanks to: EarthCorps for performing data collection Patrick Boland for performing data collection and site recons for ground-truthing of data Eliza Davidson for providing the maps for the VMP The outline and format of this document are based on the Sand Point Magnuson Park Vegetation Management Plan, by Sheldon & Associates, Inc., (2001). TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1.0 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Site Location and Context ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Greenspace Description................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 VMP Synopsis & User’s Guide......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 South Sound Course Outline
    WNPS Native Plant Stewardship Training South Puget Sound Lowlands, Spring 2016 WASHINGTON NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY Native Plant Stewardship Training – South Puget Sound Lowlands Spring 2016 Coordinator and lead trainer Jim Evans Washington Native Plant Society, State Stewardship Program Manager 206-678-8914 [email protected] Class schedule Week Date Activity or Event Description 1 Tuesday, April 5 Class 1 See syllabus Saturday, April 9 Field Trip 1 Puget lowland forests, wetlands & riparian areas 2 Tuesday, April 12 Class 2 See syllabus 3 Monday, April 18 Class 3 See syllabus 4 Tuesday, April 26 Class 4 See syllabus Saturday, April 30 Field Trip 2 Clark’s Creek restoration site & other Pierce County natural areas 5 Tuesday, May 3 Class 5 See syllabus Saturday, May 7 Field Trip 3 Oak woodland and prairie ecosystem, Thurston County 6 Tuesday, May 10 Class 6 See syllabus Classes will meet from 6:30 – 9:00 P.M on the dates indicated above. at the Tacoma Nature Center at Snake Lake, 1919 South Tyler Street, Tacoma (http://www.metroparkstacoma.org/tacomanaturecenter/). Note that Class 3 will meet on a Monday; all other classes meet on Tuesdays. 1 WNPS Native Plant Stewardship Training South Puget Sound Lowlands, Spring 2016 FIELD TRIPS Field trips are an integral part of the stewardship training. Field trips are scheduled for the 1st, 4th, and 5th Saturdays during the course period. Meeting times and places and trip logistics will be announced during class. Field trips will be all-day excursions into local ecosystems, complementing and reinforcing topics covered in classroom sessions. Expect 5-6 hours of instruction, observation, and experience, in addition to travel time to and from our assembly area.
    [Show full text]
  • Certificate Holder: Catalyst Paper Corp
    Certificate holder: Catalyst Paper Corp. Certification Body (CB): PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP FSC CW certificate code: PWC-CW-000405 Date of CB approval: Date of risk assessment: February 2018 Address of CB: 250 Howe Street, Suite 700, Vancouver, BC V6C 3S7 Certificate holder address: 3600 Lysander Lane, Richmond, BC, V7B 1C3 Districts, including countries covered with this Washington State – Darrington-Burlington-Everett areas risk assessment*: *NB! If sources of information, justification, and/or risk levels vary for different districts, separate tables shall be made for each district. Risk Category FSC Indicator Information Sources Used Brief justification Designation 1. Illegally Harvested 1.1 Evidence of enforcement of logging Washington State Forest Practice Rules Washington State Forest Practices Rules Wood The district of related laws in the district establish standards for forest practices such as origin may be considered timber harvest, pre-commercial thinning, road low risk in relation to construction, fertilization, and forest chemical illegal harvesting when all application the following indicators related to forest Washington State DNR Forest Practices Board The Forest Practices Board adopts forest governance are present: practice rules designed to protect public resources such as water quality and fish habitat while maintaining a viable timber industry. Forest Practices Compliance Monitoring The Forest Practices Compliance Monitoring Program Program provides compliance audits and monitoring reports to the Forest Practices Board FSC Global to support the analysis of its rules and guidance. Registry - Low 1.2 There is evidence in the district Forest Practices Application Review System Washington has a Forest Practices Applications demonstrating the legality of harvests and permitting system for proposed forest activities wood purchases that includes robust and which provides information for regulatory and Catalyst effective systems for granting licenses and public review and risk assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Sea Level Rise Mediated by Climate Change 7 8 9 10 Shaily Menon ● Jorge Soberón ● Xingong Li ● A
    The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com Biodiversity and Conservation Menon et al. 1 Volume 19, Number 6, 1599-1609, DOI: 10.1007/s10531-010-9790-4 1 2 3 4 5 Preliminary global assessment of biodiversity consequences 6 of sea level rise mediated by climate change 7 8 9 10 Shaily Menon ● Jorge Soberón ● Xingong Li ● A. Townsend Peterson 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 S. Menon 18 Department of Biology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan 49401-9403 USA, 19 [email protected] 20 21 J. Soberón 22 Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, The University of Kansas, 23 Lawrence, Kansas 66045 USA 24 25 X. Li 26 Department of Geography, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 USA 27 28 A. T. Peterson 29 Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, The University of Kansas, 30 Lawrence, Kansas 66045 USA 31 32 33 34 Corresponding Author: 35 A. Townsend Peterson 36 Tel: (785) 864-3926 37 Fax: (785) 864-5335 38 Email: [email protected] 39 40 The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com | DOI: 10.1007/s10531-010-9790-4 Menon et al. Biodiversity consequences of sea level rise 2 41 Running Title: Biodiversity consequences of sea level rise 42 43 Preliminary global assessment of biodiversity consequences 44 of sea level rise mediated by climate change 45 46 Shaily Menon ● Jorge Soberón ● Xingong Li ● A. Townsend Peterson 47 48 49 Abstract Considerable attention has focused on the climatic effects of global climate change on 50 biodiversity, but few analyses and no broad assessments have evaluated the effects of sea level 51 rise on biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Dlaflowerthesisfinal.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology PROJECTING THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND MANAGEMENT IN FORESTS OF THE PUGET SOUND LOWLANDS A Thesis in Ecology by Danelle Laflower Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2015 The thesis of Danelle Laflower was reviewed and approved* by the following: Matthew D. Hurteau Assistant Professor of Forest Resources, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management Thesis Advisor Margot W. Kaye Associate Professor of Forest Ecology, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management Katriona Shea Alumni Professor in the Biological Sciences, Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics David Eissenstat Professor of Woody Plant Physiology Chair of Ecology Intercollege Graduate Degree Program *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT Tree species have differential responses to changing climate, which may affect competitive interactions and alter species composition and forest carbon dynamics. In energy-limited systems, warming temperatures may lengthen growing season and increase water demand. In water-limited systems, increased evapotranspiration associated with warmer temperatures may limit species diversity and productivity. Management may help maintain productivity under changing climate by reducing competition for resources, increasing heterogeneity, and decreasing disturbance risk. I sought to quantify how projected changes in climate may alter the
    [Show full text]
  • Western Toad (Anaxyrus Boreas) in Canada
    PROPOSED Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series Management Plan for the Western Toad (Anaxyrus boreas) in Canada Western Toad 2016 Recommended citation: Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2016. Management Plan for the Western Toad (Anaxyrus boreas) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Management Plan Series. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa. iv + 38 pp. For copies of the management plan, or for additional information on species at risk, including the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk (SAR) Public Registry1. Cover illustration: copyright Syd Cannings Également disponible en français sous le titre « Plan de gestion du crapaud de l’Ouest (Anaxyrus boreas) au Canada [Proposition] » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, 2016. All rights reserved. ISBN Catalogue no. Content (excluding the illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. 1 http://sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=24F7211B-1 Management Plan for the Western Toad 2016 Preface The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk (1996)2 agreed to establish complementary legislation and programs that provide for effective protection of species at risk throughout Canada. Under the Species at Risk Act (S.C. 2002, c.29) (SARA), the federal competent ministers are responsible for the preparation of management plans for listed species of special concern and are required to report on progress within five years after the publication of the final document on the SAR Public Registry.
    [Show full text]
  • National Attention to Endangered Wildlife Is Not Affected by Global
    Environmental Science and Policy 84 (2018) 74–79 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Environmental Science and Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/envsci National attention to endangered wildlife is not affected by global T endangerment: A case study of Canada’s species at risk program ⁎ Calla V. Raymond , Lina Wen, Steven J. Cooke, Joseph R. Bennett Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: With the number of endangered species increasing and budgets for protection remaining inadequate, there is an Endangered species urgent need to judiciously prioritize management. Some potential approaches include prioritizing based on Endemic species threat, uniqueness (i.e., full species prioritized before subspecies) or endemicity. Here, we use Canada as a case Subspecies study to test whether management under the national Species at Risk Act prioritizes endemic and globally at risk Populations species, versus subspecies and populations of globally secure species. Canada is an ideal case study because it is a Conservation priorities large country with many species that are at the northern edge of their ranges, but others that are globally at risk Taxonomic bias endemics. We show that Canada does a poor job of prioritizing globally at risk and endemic full species. Only a small proportion of species listed have legally required ‘Action Plans’ for management, and this proportion is not significantly greater for globally at risk species. In addition, reptiles, amphibians, mammals and fish are more likely to be managed as subspecies or populations compared to other taxa, possibly due to greater differentiation among populations, bias in research toward charismatic or economically-valued taxa, or to allow continuation of economic activities that threaten portions of species’ habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Priority Ecoregions for Amphibian Conservation in the U.S. and Canada
    Acknowledgements This assessment was conducted as part of a priority setting effort for Operation Frog Pond, a project of Tree Walkers International. Operation Frog Pond is designed to encourage private individuals and community groups to become involved in amphibian conservation around their homes and communities. Funding for this assessment was provided by The Lawrence Foundation, Northwest Frog Fest, and members of Tree Walkers International. This assessment would not be possible without data provided by The Global Amphibian Assessment, NatureServe, and the International Conservation Union. We are indebted to their foresight in compiling basic scientific information about species’ distributions, ecology, and conservation status; and making these data available to the public, so that we can provide informed stewardship for our natural resources. I would also like to extend a special thank you to Aaron Bloch for compiling conservation status data for amphibians in the United States and to Joe Milmoe and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program for supporting Operation Frog Pond. Photo Credits Photographs are credited to each photographer on the pages where they appear. All rights are reserved by individual photographers. All photos on the front and back cover are copyright Tim Paine. Suggested Citation Brock, B.L. 2007. Identifying priority ecoregions for amphibian conservation in the U.S. and Canada. Tree Walkers International Special Report. Tree Walkers International, USA. Text © 2007 by Brent L. Brock and Tree Walkers International Tree Walkers International, 3025 Woodchuck Road, Bozeman, MT 59715-1702 Layout and design: Elizabeth K. Brock Photographs: as noted, all rights reserved by individual photographers.
    [Show full text]