IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 17, Issue 8 Ver. 8 (August. 2018), PP 46-51 www.iosrjournals.org The Psychosocial Issues and Utilization of Geriatric Welfare Services among Elderly in Field Practice Area of RHC, , , A.P

Dr.B.Sreedevi 1 , Dr.chinnamma2 Department Of Community Medicine,Guntur Medical College,Guntur. Corresponding author: Dr.B.Sreedevi 1

Abstract: Context: “Greying of nations” is the most remarkable phenomenon in 20th century.Govt.of adopted National policy on older persons in January 1999.The policy defines senior citizen or elderly as a perso who is of age 60 years or above. Objective : To study the psychosocial problems and geriatric welfare services Material and methods: It was a community based cross-sectional study of Geriatric population conducted in RHC.Sample size required was 390,sampling technique was simple random method Results : Mean age of the study population was 67.07.males 54%,females 46% and belonged to OC (51%) community. 66% married persons living with their spouse Most of them were economically independent(58.5%) and were happy(72.4%) towards life. Most of them were being looked after by family(69.2%)Awareness and utilization of welfare services were <1/3(33%) except old age pension which had more than 90% awareness and 47.4% utilization Key words: geriatric welfare service, awareness, utilization, psychosocial problems ------Date of Submission: 03-08-2018 Date of acceptance: 21-08-2018 ------

I. Background Greying of nations” is the most remarkable phenomenon in 20th century. The boundary of old age cannot be defined exactly because it does not have the same meaning in all societies. Government of India adopted „National Policy on Older Persons‟ in January, 1999. The policy defines „senior citizen‟ or „elderly‟ as a person who is of age 60 years or above1. It is common to define the “young old” as aged 60 –69 years, the “middle old” as aged 70 –79 years and the “oldest old” as 80 years and over.2,3 worldwide there are 600 million persons aged 60 and over; this total will double by 2025 and will reach virtually two billion by 2050 when there will be more people aged 60 and over than children under the age of 15. Most of them will be living in developing countries which are often least prepared to meet the challenges of rapidly ageing societies. In other words WHO says “Developing countries will become old before they become rich while industrialized countries became rich while they were growing old.” In India, currently 7.8% of the population are elderly and it is expected that this will reach 12.6% in 2025.4 By 2020 India will harbour about 158 million elderly, second largest population of elderly world wide after China (230 million).5 Worldwide increase in longevity, decrease in deaths and fertility has shifted the age distribution toward older populations. The growth of the elderly population present a new challenge to health system and social support networks in many less developed countries where populations are becoming old before they become wealthy.6 The socio-economic problems of the elderly are aggravated by factors such as the lack of social security and inadequate facilities for health care, rehabilitation, and recreation. Many surveys have shown that retired elderly people are confronted with the problems of financial insecurity and loneliness10. The Central and State governments have already made efforts to tackle the problem of economic insecurity by launching policies such as the National Policy on Older Persons, National Old Age Pension Program, Annapurna Program, etc. However, the benefits of these programs have several times in terms of the meagre budget, improper identification of beneficiaries, lengthy procedures, and irregular payment.7,8 In South India, is one of the major contributors for greying population. Here elderly constitutes about 9.3% of total population.9 Majority of the studies focussed on overall morbidity pattern. Only a few studies are available addressing psychosocial problems and their attitude towards utilisation of geriatric welfare services. Government of India has undertaken several welfare measures to cater the needs of elderly but the coverage is inadequate.

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1708084651 www.iosrjournals.org 46 | Page The Psychosocial Issues And Utilization Of Geriatric Welfare

In light of the above considerations, the present study was intended to identify the psychosocial problems of elderly and to determine their extent of utilisation of the available geriatric welfare services in the field area of RHC, Tadikonda, Guntur.

Aim and Objectives: Aim: To determine the psychosocial problems and the extent of utilization of geriatric welfare services among elderly.

Objectives: 1.To determine the psycho-social profile of elderly 2.To find out awareness and extent of utilization of Geriatric welfare services..

II. Methodology Study population: Elderly aged 60years and above Study setting: Field practice area of Rural Health Centre, Tadikonda. Study period: Period of 6 months from ethical committee clearance Study design: Cross sectional descriptive study.

Inclusion criteria: 1.Elderly aged 60 years and above residing in the field area of Rural Health Centre, Tadikonda from the past 6 months before the start of study. 2.Those who gave consent.

Exclusion criteria Non responsive, non cooperative and severely ill persons

Sample size: The sample size was calculated by following formula at 95% confidence interval with an allowable error of 12% of prevalence of psychosocial problems among elderly(42%)10 N = 4 PQ/L2 P = Prevalence of psychosocial problems among elderly = 42 % Q = 100 – P = 100 – 42 % = 58 % L = allowable error = 12% of p By substituting the values, we get N = 4 × 42 × 58 / (5.04)2= 384,considering 1% non response rate (3.84) thus constitute 388 to make it round figure thus constitute 390

Study method: The Rural health centre,Tadikonda has 4 sub centres with total population of 45,917 (as on 16-1-2017).

Table 1: List of sub centres of RHC, Tadikonda by population S.No Name of the sub centre Total population 1 Tadikonda 17770 2 Ponnekallu 9031 3 Pedaparimi 6707 4 Motadaka 12409 Total 45,917

2 sub centres Pedaparimi and were selected by simple random sampling method (lottery method). There were 5 villages in 2 sub centres as listed below. Later the population of each village was enumerated and it was found that the population of 5 villages was 19409. The study subjects were selected from these populations by using proportionate to the population of a particular village i.e. population proportionate to size method (PPS method). Thus a sample size of 390 was selected from each of these 5 villages. When sufficient number of study subjects cannot be found, the neighbouring villages were visited till attaining the desired number of study subjects.Thus the final sample of 390 study subjects included in the study from the 5 villages was shown in the table below

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1708084651 www.iosrjournals.org 47 | Page The Psychosocial Issues And Utilization Of Geriatric Welfare

Table 2: Selection of study population by PPS method in respective villages Name of the sub Name of the village/ Total population as on 16- Sample to be drawn as per S.No. centre habitat 1-2017 PPS method 1 Pedaparimi Pedaparimi 7000 141 2 Motadaka Motadaka 3509 71 Nidumukkala 3500 70

Lemalle 2500 50

Karlapudi 2900 58

Total 19409 390

Method of Collection of Data: The study subjects were contacted through household visits for data collection. In each household, elderly was contacted and the purpose of the study was explained. The study subjects were subjected for personal interview using a pretested, semi structured questionnaire regarding socio demographic,psychosocial aspects, and geriatric welfare services . A pilot study was conducted and suitable changes were made in the questionnaire.

Data analysis : Data was entered in MS Excel and analyzed by using SPSS 17 version.Statistical tests like proportions(%) and chi-square test were applied.

III. Results Table 3: socio demographic factors of elderly N=390 Age Frequency %

60-64 141 36.2 65-69 122 31.2 70-74 71 18.2 75-79 30 7.7 80-84 20 5.1 85-89 4 1.0 90-94 2 0.5

Gender Male 208 54 female 182 46 Caste OC 197 51 BC 114 29 SC 79 20

Mean age of the study population was 67.07. majority (36.2%) were between 60-64 years followed by 65-69 years(31.2%).Most of them were males(54%).Most (51%) of them were belonged to OC community followed by BC(29%).

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1708084651 www.iosrjournals.org 48 | Page The Psychosocial Issues And Utilization Of Geriatric Welfare

Table 4: Gender wise distribution of Psychosocial profile of elderly N=390

Most (66%)of the married study subjects were living with their spouse.Most (58.5%)were economically independent.Most(72.4%) were happy towards life.Most(69%)were looked after by family. Main reasons for sadness were lonliness(12.6%) and poverty(11.5%).There was a significant difference between gender and marital status,living arrangements and attitude towards life.

Table 5: Awareness of geriatric welfare services N=390 Welfare services Male Female Total % Statistical significance

Old age pension x2 = 0.215 Aware 198 175 373 96 df=1 Not aware 10 7 17 4 p=0.643,NS Fare concession in travel aware 112 62 174 44.6 x2 = 15.422 not aware 96 120 216 55.4 df=1 p=0.000,s

Enhanced interest on savings Aware 64 37 101 25.9 x2 = 5.512 Not aware 144 145 289 74.1 df=1 p=0.019,s

Preference for seat reservation x2 = 8.175 Aware 97 59 156 40 df=1 Not aware 111 123 234 60 p=0.004,s

Majority of the study subjects(96%) were aware of old age pension scheme and there was no significant difference in gender.There was a significant difference between gender and awareness of fare concession in travel,enhanced interest on savings,preference for seat reservation

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1708084651 www.iosrjournals.org 49 | Page The Psychosocial Issues And Utilization Of Geriatric Welfare

Table 6: utilization of geriatric welfare services N=390 Old age pension Frequency % Utilizing 185 47.4 Not utilizing 205 52.6 Fare concission in travel Utilizing 125 32.1 Not utilizing 265 67.9 Enhanced interest on savings Utilizing 10 2.5 Not utilizing 380 97.5 Preference for seat reservation Utilizing not utilizing 51 13.1 339 86.9

Majority of the study subjects (47%) utilizing old age pension scheme followed by fare concession in travelling(32.1%).

IV. Discussion In this study, out of total 390 geriatric people 182(46%) were females and 208(54%) were males. Majority of the study subjects (36.2%) were in the age group of 60 – 64 years followed by 65- 69(31.1%)years.Similar finding was reported by other studies like Chauhan et al.1 Barua et al2 where it was 42.8%(60-64years) and 80%(60-69years) respectively Majority (66.2%).were married.Among married females majority (73.4%)were widowed.similar findings were reported by Barua et al 2 Present study showed that 43.6% were living with their spouse for whom majority(70%) were males and majority(68.5%) of females were living alone due to loss of their spouse which was comparable to a study done by Madhu et al. found that 46.94% were living along with their spouse and children3.Majority(69%) were being looked after and least (10.3%)were neglected by family‟ Similar findings were also reported by Lena et al4. In the present study , majority(96.4%)of elderly were aware and utilizing(47.4%) old age/widow pension scheme.A study done by Joseph in Mangalore reported that it was only 8.3% , whereas in North India it was 10%.Present study reported that 44.6% were aware of fare concessions in travel, 40% aware of preference for seat reservation and 25.9% were aware of enhanced interest on savings which was comparable to a study done by joseph.et.al where it was found to be 67.5%, 55.8% and 60.2% respectively5 This can be explained by the differences in socio economic status, place of residence and increased awareness regarding welfare schemes among elderly.

V. Conclusion A community based cross-sectional study conducted among geriatric population in field practice area(RHC) of Tadikonda,Guntur.Mean age was 67.1years.Male and female population were about to equal in size and majority were belonged to OC community.Among married elderly majority of male living with their spouse but majority of female living alone due to loss of spouse was being responsible for sadness of life which was statistically significant.More than half were economically independent. More than 2/3 were being looked after by the family.Almost all the study subjects were aware of old age pension scheme but nearly half of them were utilizing the scheme. Awareness and utilization of other geriatric welfare services like fare concession in travel,preference for seat reservation in Railways, and enhanced interest on savings in Bank or Post-office were less than 1/3.There was a statistically significant difference between awareness of geriatric welfare services and gender except old age pension scheme.

VI. Recommendations 1.Geriatric Clinics should be introduced in all the primary health care settings. 2.There is a need for a registry in all primary health centres in order to provide data base for efficient and effective health services and follow up. 3.Elderly clubs should be formed with the help of panchayat members. Construction of old age homes and facilities for organizations working for the welfare of the aged should be made available and accessible. 4.From the study findings it is quite evident that there is low level of awareness regarding government welfare schemes among the study population. Hence regular IEC activities should be carried out to increase the awareness among senior citizens for their welfare and utilization of services in this region.

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1708084651 www.iosrjournals.org 50 | Page The Psychosocial Issues And Utilization Of Geriatric Welfare

Limitations Psychological problems including sleep pattern were not assessed in this study

References [1]. .Chauhanp, Chandrashekar V. A study on morbidity pattern among the geriatric people of Venkatachalem village Nellore District, AP. MRIMS J Health Sci. 2013;1(2):48-53 [2]. Barua A, Mangesh R, Harsha Kumar H N, Mathew S. A cross-sectional study on quality of life in geriatric population. Indian J Community Med. 2007;32:146-7. [3]. Madhu T, Sreedevi A. A study of socio demographic profile of geriatricpopulation in the field practice area of Kurnool Medical College. Int J Res Dev Health. 2013; 1(2):69-76. [4]. Lena A, Ashok K, Padma M, Kamath V, Kamath A. Health and social problems of the elderly: A cross-sectional study in Udupi Taluka, Karnataka. Indian J Community Med. 2009;34(2):131-4. [5]. Joseph N, Nelliyanil M, Nayak SR et al. Assessment of morbidity pattern, quality of life and awareness of government facilities among elderly populationinSoutIndia.J Family Med Prim Care. 2015;4(3):405-10. [6]. Jeyalakshmi S, Chakrabarti S, Gupta N. Situation analysis of the elderly in India. Central Statistics Office Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation, Government of India, NewDelhi;June2011.[Internet].Availablefrom: http://www.mospi.nic.in/mospi_new/upload/elderly_in_india.pd [7]. Forman DE, Berman AD, McCabe CH, Baim DS, Wei JY. "PTCA in the elderly: the „young-old‟ versus the „old-old‟. J American Geriatrics Society 1992;40(1):19–22. [8]. Detels Roger, Me Ewen James. Beaglehole Robert. Tanka Heiza. “Oxford Text Book of Public Health”, 4th Ed. Vol 3. Oxford Medical Publications (2002): 1713-32. [9]. Ashok kumar T,Sowmya KR,Radhika G..Morbidity pattern among the elderly people living in a Southern Rural India-A cross sectional study,Nat.J.Res.Com.Med.,1(1):01-60,2012 [10]. P.K.Goel,S.K.Garg,J.V.Singh,M.Bhatnagar,H.Chopra,S.K.Bajpai..Unmet needs of the elderly in a Rural population of Meerut,IJCM VOL28,NO.4,Oct-Des,2003 [11]. Ayan Ghosh,Deblina Sarkar,Ranabir pal,Bijoy Mukherjee..A profile of common morbidities among elderly Rural Indian Population,American Journal of Public Health

Dr.B.Sreedevi " The Psychosocial Issues And Utilization Of Geriatric Welfare Services Among Elderly In Field Practice Area Of RHC,Tadikonda, Guntur,A.P."IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS), vol. 17, no. 8, 2018, pp 46-51.

DOI: 10.9790/0853-1708084651 www.iosrjournals.org 51 | Page