Arxiv:1910.10089V1

arXiv:1910.10089v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 22 Oct 2019 oeec,i iia a swe ti lie that claimed is coherence quantum it from when harvest quantum as be from way can similar harvest polarization a be spin in can work coherence, thermodynamic that † ∗ been has nanoscale the at control of [ coherence way additional An [ fields externally the least magnetic at and leaving picture the leads hence of out produce, ferromagnetic interaction, they using field Kondo by exchange the overcome influence was through to what condition background a is electronic systems broken the spin is in which fields magnetic symmetry as by a operate analytically, shown that previously junctions tunnel [ found diodes magnetic been temperature thermal has in and it mainly and time, introduced useful mean fields, been magnetic has the less control at and dependent unavoidable less use seems to this desired is it [ though even voltage include control [ [ dynamics interactions single magnetic the of atom [ control by anisotropy the magnetic at uniaxial point ion can one [ field examples the reported in working scientists the e for interest new inducing and oto nidvda tm [ atoms individual on control a eoeesnilfrwiigadraigfo new a [ logic from spin few reading to single and on based writing devices of for generation essential become has lcrncaddress: Electronic lcrncaddress: Electronic h oto fmgei neatosa h nanoscale the at interactions magnetic of control The 12 19 – otiuet h cetneo h yohssta pnpol spin that hypothesis the of acceptance e the dependent to voltage contribute the in variations to leads nmlclrqatmmechanics. quantum molecular in sing the of commutation fie dependent magnetic phase exchange a dependent molecule, phase the a spi with couple to s the lead the to when features related that This features show additional we type work, Aharonov-Bohm a the this to in moments Here individual teraction. the t for including required discussed is previously been has description ical – 14 23 hrnvBh E Bohm Aharonov h xeietlraiaino ope pnpi a been has pair spin coupled a of realization experimental The 11 [email protected] jonas.fransson@physics.uu.se n oclierodradcia exchange chiral and order noncollinear and ] ,u oteetn hti a enclaimed been has it that extent the to up ], , .INTRODUCTION I. 17 ff , csi ffnaetladpractical and fundamental of is ects 18 .O h te ad si a been has it as hand, other the On ]. 11 , 15 17 9 , n antcfils[ fields magnetic and ] – 16 7 11 , unu rnpr n lcrncSrcueTer Unit, Theory Structure Electronic and Transport Quantum 10 .Tetpclwy of ways typical The ]. ,snl oeuespin molecule single ], 8 rkS¨qit hDadJnsFaso,Ph.D Fransson, Jonas and Ph.D Sjöqvist, Erik ,cnrlo h atom the of control ], , ff 11 c nVlaeDpnetMlclrSi ie Switch Dimer Spin Molecular Dependent Voltage in ect knw nttt o cec n Technology, and Science for Institute Okinawa ]. unDvdVsuzJrmlo Ph.D Jaramillo, Vasquez David Juan eateto hsc n Astronomy, and Physics of Department 4 – 6 .A typical As ]. Dtd coe 3 2019) 23, October (Dated: ff ff psl University, Uppsala c h lcrn ntemlclrlgn hog h od i Kondo the through ligand molecular the in electrons the ect psl,Sweden. Uppsala, knw,Japan. Okinawa, cieecag rfiebtentesi ar hs predict These pair. spin the between profile exchange ective 1 – 9 3 ], ], nefrmtrsoni Fig. in shown interferometer ec famgei edee huhteei emnn magn ring. permanent the a of is middle there the though in even field field magnetic a of sence ahwl eisniiet t n ec,ti eoe an becomes this hence, and coherence. it, quantum induce to to insensitive technique attractive be interferomet magnitude the will its in that electrons nonetheless, path the is, but as up important required, less set is becomes particular field this magnetic in a phase Aharonov-Bohm e phase the ability Aharonov-Bohm geometric the the through induce through is to and interference same, quantum the exhibit is to what or system, molecular [ etoe eocpcitreoee osssi w energ two in consists it interferometer mesoscopic through mentioned only Fig. interact in where spins shown junction, coupled as tunneling electronically magnetic a the in embedded ometer phase with interfere then to waves inco two An in interferometer. split is Aharonov-Bohm electron the of Sketch 1: FIG. ecniinta oa antzto ftejunction the of magnetization local that condition he 24 rzto a ehretdfo unu coherence quantum from harvested be can arization icigbhvo fteculdsi aremerge. pair spin coupled the of behavior witching eew rps oeua hrnvBh interfer- Aharonov-Bohm molecular a propose we Here .A lentv a oidc unu oeec na in coherence quantum induce to way alternative An ]. eotdb ek Webber Heiko by reported dcmn rmtefroant nproximity in ferromagnets the from coming ld let ari lcdi nitreoer e pof up set interferometry an in placed is pair n / rpe rudsaeaon eoba n it and bias zero around state ground triplet ∗ 1 † ihisraiaina mesoscopic a as realization its with , et.al B 2 0 n t theoret- its and h elzto fthe of realization The . ff c [ ect 25 ions .Tedfii of deficit The ]. n- φ nteab- the in , ming etic ric y s 2 levels ǫa and ǫb that play the interchangeable role of electron the AB Phase dependent ground state shift. Following th source and sink which are shifted by δ energy units with section of results, we discuss the more relevant features of respect to each other, levels ǫ1 and ǫ2 which play the role of the predictions and then conclude. Fruitful appendices on beam splitter/recombiner due to their coupling with the two the molecular and nonequilibrium Green’s function and the interferometer branches which are resemble by levels ǫu and effective theory for the exchange field and the magnetic ǫd. The corresponding couplings between these energy levels interactions are presented. giving rise to the mesoscopic interferometer are shown in Fig. 2. This mesoscopic interferometer has as main objective the mediation of the interaction ab between spins/magnetic II. MATHEMATICAL MODELS J moments Sa and Sb through the Kondo interaction with coupling strength Ja and Jb as shown in Fig. 2 resembling the A. Multilevel Molecular Green’s Function realization by H. Weber et.al [26]. This molecular structure that play the role of an Aharonov-Bohm interferometer is Here we first consider a generalized noninteracting brought in proximity/contact with two ferromagnetic leads, molecule driven out of equilibrium as in reference [24], gov- as shown in Fig. 3. The basic hypothesis of this work is erned by the following model Hamiltonian: that, the Aharonov-Bohm phase will play a fundamental role both in the injected spin polarization in the interferometer (e) (spin) = Leads + T + mol + mol , (1) from the exterior and in the effective interaction between the H H H H H Leads = ǫkσc† ckσ + ǫqσc† cqσ, (2) magnetic units and hence in the spin excitation spectrum and H kσ qσ the ground state itself. Xkσ Xqσ T = Vmkσc† dmσ + V∗ d† ckσ H kσ mkσ mσ mXkσ

+ Vmqσcq†σdmσ + Vm∗ qσdm† σcqσ, (3) mXqσ (e) = ǫmσd† dmσ + γm m σσd† dm σ, (4) H mol mσ 1 2 m1σ 2 Xmσ mX1m2σ (spin) = Jmd† σσ σ dmσ Sm(t), (5) Hmol mσ1 1 2 2 · mXσ1σ2 d d where mσ and mσ′ creates and annihilates a single electron state in the molecule at the m th energy level with spin σ − and spin σ′ respectively. Leads represents the Hamiltonian describing the the metallicH leads with band structure specified by ǫkσ and ǫqσ for the left and the right lead respectively, FIG. 2: Two Spin RKKY Interfering Machine: Two electronic levels with associated creation and annihilation operators given by S S ǫA and ǫB are coupled to two magnetic units labeled as A and B ck,qσ and ck,q† σ. The multilevel molecular Hamiltonian here via Kondo interaction constants JA and JB. Both magnetic units is given by a sum of contributions from the electronic part interact through the RKKY interaction where the electron bath is (e) (e spin) and the electron-spin coupling contribution − , an Aharonov-Bohm like interferometer composed by two electronic Hmol Hmol with ǫmσ being the level energy, γm m σσ the level hybridiza- beam splitters ǫ1 and ǫ2, and an upper and lower interferometer 1 2 tion matrix and Jm the Kondo interaction between the spin branch respectively labeled as ǫu and ǫd. A phase φ1d is printed in moment Sm(t) and the spin of the electrons in the m th en- the hybridization parameters γ1d and γ2d, which plays the role of an − Aharonov-Bohm phase. ergy level. The nonequilibrium part comes from the coupling between the multilevel molecule and the environment or leads given by the Hamiltonian T , where the hybridization am- The paper is organized as follows: First we detail the system, H the model Hamiltonian and the mathematical model to eval- plitudes are given by Vmkσ and Vmqσ when hybridizing the m th energy level of the molecule with the left and right lead uate the nonequilibrium Green’s function for the full system − in terms of the Aharonov-Bohm Phase and, the effective respectively. The system driven out of equilibrium is shown exchange magnetic field induced from the ferromagnets and in Fig. 3, where the blue lead represents the colder lead with the effective isotropic spin-spin interaction (Nonequilibrium temperature TL, and the red lead represents the hotter lead at RKKY) in terms of the Nonequilibrium Green’s function. temperature TR, where in the case of study TL = TR. Both Second, we establish the most relevant predictions in the part chemical potentials, the one in the left lead and the one in the eVDS eVDS named results, being: 1. The exchange field dependence right lead are set to be µL = µ0 + and µR = µ0 re- 2 − 2 on the AB phase and coherence degree, 2. The shift in the spectively as labeled in Fig. 3. Each of the leads is character- effective interaction as a function of the degree of coherence ized respectively by the Fermi function which is parametrized and as a function of the AB Phase and 3. the commutation by the temperature and the chemical potential. Additionally, as a function of voltage in the spin excitation spectrum the couplings to the leads or reservoirs labeled in Fig. 3 as Γ(α) Γ(β) of the coupled spin pair for different AB phases showing Aσ and Bσ, represent the hybridization between levels ǫA 3 and ǫB respectively with the left and right lead and are related Green’s function, and then we specify the tensors that define to the self-energy by the expression: such object according to our system of study given in Fig. 3. We depart from the generalized equation of motion given by: i Σ(χ) = Λ(χ) Γ(χ), − 2 and to the hybridization amplitude matrix element between ∂G (t,t ) i the molecule and the metal through the retarded version of the ih mnσσ′ ′ = δ δ δ t t T d t , d t , ¯ mn σσ′ ( ′) K mσ( ) n†σ ( ′) self-energy: ∂t − − h¯ H ′ D (6) E

i(φm φn) which is solved in appendix ??. By deﬁning the left and right R(χ) Vmkσ Vnkσ e− − Σmnσσ = | || | . self-energies correspondingly as follows: ǫ ǫkσ + iδ Xk − Moreover, we derive a generalized formula for a molecular (L) Σ (t,t′) = V∗ (t)Vµkσ(t′) kσ(t,t′), (7) mµσσ mkσ G Xk

(R) Σ (t,t′) = V∗ (t)Vµqσ(t′) qσ(t,t′). (8) mµσσ mqσ G Xq

where Vµk,qσ(t′) deﬁnes a tunneling process from m th energy level of the molecule into the left lead for wavevector− k or into the right lead for wavevector q at time t′, Vm∗ kσ(t) de- ﬁnes the tunneling process from the left lead for wavevector k or from the right lead for wavevector q into the m th energy FIG. 3: Molecular Magnet Composed by a Dimer of Spins Inter- − level of the molecule, and k,qσ(t,t′) is the Green’s function acting through a Two Branch AB Electron Interferometer: The cou- for the corresponding lead.G Then, the complete solution for plings to the leads, both left (α) and right (β), are represented by the the Molecular Nonequilibrium Green’s function can be writ- Γ(α,β) matrix element mnσσ, ten as follows:

Gmnσσ (t,t′) = δmnδσσ mσ(t,t′) + γmm mσ(t,τ)Gm nσσ (τ,t′)dτ + Jm σσσ Sm(τ) mσ(t,τ)Gmnσ σ (τ,t′)dτ ′ Z ′ G 1 Z G 1 ′ Z 1 · h iG 1 ′ Xm1 Xσ1 + Σ(L) G + Σ(R) G mσ(t,τ) mµσσ(τ,τ′) µnσσ′ (τ′,t′)dτ′dτ mσ(t,τ) mµσσ(τ,τ′) µnσσ′ (τ′,t′)dτ′dτ (9) Xµ Z Z G Xµ Z Z G

where the molecular Green’s function for the close system is Zeeman ﬁeld, which can be written as: denoted by mσ(t,t′). Now, we particularize expression 9 for (z) G ǫaσ = ǫaσ + Ja Sa σ , (11) the system shown in Fig. 3. By denoting the Green’s function h i σσ (z) for the open system as g0, the coupling matrix which will con- ǫbσ = ǫbσ + Jb Sb σσσ. (12) tain the Aharonov Bohm phase as γ and the corresponding h i (L) (R) from where the bare molecular Green’s function can be writ- coupling to the leads as Γ and Γ , we write the contour or- dered nonequilibrium stationary Green’s function as follows: ten as follows:

h¯ω ǫaσ 0 0 0 0 0 − 0 h¯ω ǫ1σ 0 0 0 0 1 i (L) (R) 1  −  G = g0− γ + Γ + Γ − . (10) 1  0 0 h¯ω ǫdσ 0 0 0  − 2 g0− =  − .  0 0 0 h¯ω ǫuσ 0 0   −   0 0 0 0 h¯ω ǫ2σ 0   −  From the equation of motion given by expression 6, theeﬀect  0 0 0 0 0 h¯ω ǫbσ   −  of the Kondo coupling can be determined, as analogous to a  (13)  4

Next, the coupling matrix can be defined specifically for the where η is a variable that represents classical spins, phonons Fig. 3, which is given by: or any other classical field, including possible EM waves. Now by integrating the electron fields in expression 21, we 0 γa 0 0 00 can define an effective spin action from a new path integral  γa 0 γ1d γ1u 0 0  given by:  0 γ1d 0 0 γ2d 0  γ =   (14)   1 S eff [η]  0 γ1u 0 0 γ2u 0  = [η]Det ( i) − (1 I ) = [η]e−   Z D − G − GH D  0 0 γ2d γ2u 0 γb  Z Z   (21)  00 0 0 γb 0      and from this effective action, a two time pseudo-effective for the specific case of this study we assume that γ = γ , 1d 2d Hamiltonian can be defined in terms of either retarded, ad- which becomes the control parameter for quantum coherence vanced or Keldysh susceptibilities [12, 24, 27–29], but we de- in the system in a similar was as the length of an interfering cide to follow the procedure in [24, 29] just considering the path in a photon interferometer. As for the Aharonov-Bohm retarded susceptibility, hence writting the pseudo Hamiltonian phase, we assume γ γ eiφ0 , where φ is the Aharonov- 1d 1d 0 as follows: Bohm phase. → spin(t,t′) = mn(t,t′)Sm(t) Sn(t′) + Tmn(t,t′) Sm(t) Sn(t′) To evaluate the typical Green’s functions we use analyt- H Xmn J · · × ical continuation and hence obtaining the retarded and e f f Sm(t) Imn(t,t′) Sn(t′) µBSm(t) Bm (t), advanced form of the Green’s functions we use the Keldysh · · − Xm · equation to determine the form of the nonequilibrium Green’s (22) functions given by: where mn(t,t ) is the isotropic exchange interaction which is J ′ R Σ A one of the quantities of interest in this study, Tmn(t,t′) is the G (t,t′) = dτ1dτ2G (t,τ1) (τ1,τ2)G (τ2,t′), I Z Z effective anisotropic anti-symmetric chiral exchange, mn(t,t′) (15) is the anisotropic symmetric exchange interaction which contains the uniaxial and the planar anisotropies mediated by or in the frequency domain: e f f electron and Bm is the effective magnetive field induced by the spin assymetry in the Fermi gas, which is the other G(ω) = GR(ω)Σ(ω)GA(ω), (16) quantity of interest. The system in Fig. 3 is driven is such a where the lesser/greater self energy is given by: way that the lattice inversion symmetry of the junction makes Tmn(t,t′) = 0, and by considering each of the spin units a (α) spin half unit, we make Imn(t,t ) unimportant for the specific Σ (ω) = ( i) fα( ω)Γ , (17) ′ ± Xα ± problem. where α indexes the different reservoirs. Note that all of the Therefore, we can define an effective spin problem in above are matrices in site and spin space. the time invariant regime for Fig. 3 given by: e f f e f f spin = AB(t,t′)SA SB µBSA(t) B µBSB(t) B . H J · − · A − · B B. Effective Theory of Magnetic Interactions (23) Now by defining two new Green’s functions g and G: We consider a nonequilibrium Fermi gas in the absence of spin-orbit coupling with Hamiltonian matrix elements given G + G by 0, with diluted magnetic impurities interacting locally g = ↑ ↓ , (24) withH intinerant electrons with a Hamiltonian matrix elements 2 G G given by I, which is specified by: H G = ↑ − ↓ , (25) 2 I[η](r′) = J(r,r′)S(r′) σ. (18) H · we may write the parameters of the spin Hamiltonian given by Given these information, the partition function of the system expression 23 in the following way: can be evaluated as a Keldysh path integral given by: < > > < Jm Jn gmn(ǫ)gnm(ǫ′) gmn(ǫ)gnm(ǫ′) dǫ dǫ′ mn(ω) = − J 2 Z Z h¯ω ǫ + ǫ 2π 2π ¯ iS [ψ,ψ,η¯ ] − ′ = [ψ,ψ] ηe (19) J J G< (ǫ) G> (ǫ ) G> (ǫ) G< (ǫ ) dǫ dǫ Z Z Z D D m n mn · nm ′ − mn · nm ′ ′ − 2 Z Z h¯ω ǫ + ǫ′ 2π 2π with Keldysh action given by: − (26)

3 3 ∂ and S [ψ,ψ,η¯ ] = d rd r′ dtψ¯(r,t) ih¯ 0 I[η] ψ(r′,t), Z Z IK ∂t −H −H ! e f f dω < Bm = Jm m G (ω). (27) (20) ℑ Z 2π mm 5

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION magnetic field or the exchange field, has to do mainly with the question of how efficient can the spin asymmetry from the A. Effective Magnetic Field leads be transfer into the molecule. In this case we find that this spin asymmetry depends heavily on the Aharonov phase From expression 27 and expression 25, which uses similar and in the degree of coherence as shown in Fig. 4. notation as the one used in [24], one can see that the effective

FIG.4: Effective exchange fields: Here we divide the illustration into 4 panels where we show the effective exchange field acting on each spin moment as a function of voltage and coherence control energy π π for φ0 = 2 in the upper two panels, and for φ0 = 4 the lower two panels, and for spin labeled as A the left-momst panels and the right most panels for the spin labeled as B.

Each effective magnetic field magnetizes efficiently the junc- B. ShiftintheEffective Exchange tion and hence as shown in previous work [11, 18], the nonequilibrium drive will induce a nontrivial behavior on the In previous work we have shown that as a function of surrounding electrons and spin moments due to the effective voltage, the ground state of a coupled spin pair can be shifted interaction between spins, here given by expression 26. For between singlet and triplet, for a spin 1 coupled pair [11] the case shown in Fig. 4, we show the effective exchange 2 in experimental agreement with [26]. Here, Fig. 5 shows fields acting on both spins due to the surrounding electronic that the Aharonov-Bohm phase is completely capable of structure for Aharonov-Bohm phases equal to π/2 and π/4 re- commuting the ground state of the coupled spin pair by spectively due to the fact that modulatingthe phase in between changing the sign of the effective interaction using phase these values will effectively shift the ground state of the cou- modulation mechanisms. pled spin pair as shown in Fig. 6. In Fig. 5, in the upper left panel we can appreciate the normal behavior of the voltage dependent exchange of a system such as the one given by Fig. 3 in the absence of any quantum interference processes. Once quantum interference is allowed by setting γ1d = 1.8[meV] times a AB phase factor, 6

π a phase dependent shift can be appreciate it in the upper to 0 and to 4 , and for the the initial phases, increasing voltage right panel of Fig. 5. For a value of γ1d = 3.1[meV] we can will induce again a four fold degeneracy in the coupled spin appreciate in the lower left panel of Fig. 5 that for some AB pair contrary to what is observed for phases like φ0 = 0 and π phases the zero bias ground state shift is complete. More φ0 = 4 , what is shown in the upper left panel. This is one importantly, for γ1d = 4.0[meV] in the lower right panel of of the key results of the work we are presenting which will Fig. 5, we can appreciate a zero bias shift of the ground state be backed up by an analysis of the occupation of each of the π 2π of the coupled spin pair by modulating the phase from 2 to 3 ground states for diﬀerent phases.

=0 = /6 = /4 = /3 = /2 =2 /3 =5 /6 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.03 0.03

0.02 0.02 =0 0 [meV] [meV] ab ab 0.01 0.01

0 0 Exchange J Exchange J

-0.01 -0.01 -10 -5 0 5 10 -10 -5 0 5 10 Bias Voltage [mV] Bias Voltage [mV]

=0 = /6 = /4 = /3 = /2 =2 /3 =5 /6 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.04 0.2

0.02 0

0 -0.2 [meV] [meV]

ab -0.02 ab -0.4 =0 -0.04 -0.6 0 = /4 0 = /2 -0.06 -0.8 0

Exchange J Exchange J =2 /3 0 -0.08 -1

-0.1 -1.2 -10 -5 0 5 10 -10 -5 0 5 10 Bias Voltage [mV] Bias Voltage [mV]

FIG. 5: Eﬀective Isotropic Exchange for diﬀerent values of γ1d: upper left panel for γ1d = 0[meV], upper right panel for γ1d = 1.8[meV], lower left panel for γ1d = 3.1[meV], and lower right panel for γ1d = 4.0[meV].

Another interesting manifestation of the coherence in the sys- coupled spin pair four fold degeneratefor 5mV VDS 5mV − ≤ ≥ tem that goes along with the inducedAharonovBohm phase is for coherence strengths large than γ1d = 3.5[meV]. the switching of the exchangeinteraction with with the change in the coherence strength γ1d, what has been illustrated in the previous Figure (Fig. 5), but it can be seen in a greater C. Spin Occupation and Eigen Energies amount of detail in Fig. 6 for an Aharonov-Bohm phase of π φ0 = 2 . First we consider the important zero bias anomaly Now we focus on the signatures of the ground state shift presented in Fig. 6, where around γ1d 1[meV] we can ob- in the spin excitation spectrum. A coupled spin pair, in the ≈ serve a shift in sign in the exchange interaction, and hence a absence of a magnetic field has a singlet/triplet configuration shift in the ground state, now clearly because of the coherence given by: strength, which is accompanied by the shift in ground state 1 present when the AB phase is modulated as shown in Fig. 5. s = ( ) (28) Other important features that can be observed from Fig. 6 are | i √2 |↑↓i − |↓↑i the finite bias features, which exhibit interesting behavior in 1 t = ( + ), , , (29) terms of looking the exchange interaction to zero making the | i √2 |↑↓i |↓↑i |↑↑i |↓↓i 7 where s denotes the singlet state with energy 3 ab, and t according to expressions 28 and 29 and their corresponding enotes| thei triplet state which is one with triple− degeneracyJ |ati energies to a ground state energy shift under the modulation of energies ab. Theeffect of the magnetic field is noticeable the phase. By lookingat Fig. 9, we can appreciate a prominent J

Effective Isotropic Exchange J [meV] - = /2 12 0 = /2 4 0 0 40

3.5 -0.2 30 3

[meV] 20

1d 2.5 -0.4

2 10 -0.6 1.5 0 -0.8 1 Coherence Level Eigen Energies [meV] -10

0.5 -1 -20 0 -10 -5 0 5 10 -10 -5 0 5 10 Bias Voltage [mV] Bias Voltage [mV]

FIG. 6: Exchange interaction in the coupled spin pair as a function FIG. 8: Eigen energy for the case φ0 = π/2 of voltage and coherence strength. low energy peak of a single state, while a nearly degenerate only in the states and which increase and decrease conﬁguration with three states emerges as a high energy peak, their energy correspondingly,|↑↑i |↓↓i which is signed in to the spin in contrast with Fig. 8, where clearly the triplet state emerges occupation of the coupled spin pair as shown in Fig. 7 Now as a lower energy peak, hence, showing a clear signature of a phase modulation based ground state shift.

1 = /4 0 0.5

0.8

0 0.6

-0.5 0.4 Spin Occupation 0.2 -1 Eigen Energies [meV]

0 -10 -5 0 5 10 -1.5 Bias Voltage [mV] -10 -5 0 5 10 Bias Voltage [mV] FIG. 7: Spin Occupation: Three nearly degenerate states around zero = bias and for 5mV VDS 5mV, corresponding to a triplet state in FIG. 9: Eigen energy for the case φ0 π/4 the presence− of an e≤ffective≥ exchange field shown in Fig. 4. And one state corresponding to a singlet state. we focus on the eigen energy plots which will provide support IV. CONCLUSIONS for the claim of groundstate shift by modulatingthe Aharonov Bohm phase in the system shown in Fig. 3. By looking at Here we presented a coupled spin pair embeddedin an elec- Fig. 5 we can see that for an Aharonov Bohm phase of π/4, tronic Aharonov Bohm like interferometer, which in turn me- the exchange interaction is slightly positive compared to the diates the interaction among the spin moments. Furthermore case when the exchange interaction prominently negative for we drive the interferometer out of equilibrium using a ferro- the case of an Aharonov Bohm phase of π/2, which leads, magnetic tunnel junction which produces an exchange field 8 acting on the individual spin moments, being the latter a sig- Science, Technology and Innovation) 528 Grant for interna- nature of a spin imbalance or asymmetry in the system in- tional Doctoral studies and financial support from the Oki- jected from the ferromagnetic leads and enhanced through the nawa Institute for Science and Technology (OIST) through the Aharonov Bohm phase. The degree of coherence of the in- Quantum Transport and Electronic Structure Theory Unit. E. terferometer is controlled through the hybridization energy Sjöqvist and J. Fransson would like to acknowledge support iφ γ1de 0 , being φ0 the Aharonov Bohm phase, and we show from Vetenskapre.t. Authors acknowledge useful discussion that in the presence of an exchange magnetic field, the ground with Karlo Penc and Judit Romhanyi. state of the coupled spin pair can be shifted both by modulating the phase and my changing the nature and strength of the quantum coherence in the AB interferometer.

V. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

J.D Vasquez-Jaramillo would like to acknowledge ﬁnan- cial support from the Colciencias (Colombian Department for

[1] Matteo Mannini, Francesco Pineider, Philippe Sainctavit, 2010. Chiara Danieli, Edwige Otero, Corrado Sciancalepore, [13] H. Hammar and J. Fransson. Time-dependent spin and trans- Anna Maria Talarico, Marie-anne Arrio, Andrea Cornia, Dante port properties of a single molecule magnet in a tunnel junction. Gatteschi, and Roberta Sessoli. Magnetic memory of a single- Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, molecule quantum magnet wired to a gold surface. Nature Ma- 054311(August):1–14, 2016. terials, 8(3):194–197, 2009. [14] H Hammar, Juan David Vasquez Jaramillo, and J Fransson. [2] A F Otte, M Ternes, S Loth, C P Lutz, C F Hirjibehedin, and Spin-dependent heat signatures of single-molecule spin dynam- A J Heinrich. Spin Excitations of a Kondo-Screened Atom ics. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Coupled to a Second Magnetic Atom. Physical Review Letters, Physics, 99(11):115416, 2019. 107203(September):1–4, 2009. [15] Miguel Angel´ Niño, Iwona Agnieszka Kowalik, Fran- [3] Sebastian Loth, Susanne Baumann, Christopher P. Lutz, D. M. cisco Jesús Luque, Dimitri Arvanitis, Rodolfo Miranda, and Eigler, and Andreas J. Heinrich. Bistability in atomic-scale an- Juan José De Miguel. Enantiospecific spin polarization of tiferromagnets. Science, 335(6065):196–199, 2012. electrons photoemitted through layers of homochiral organic [4] Lapo Bogani and Wolfgang Wernsdorfer. Molecular spintronics molecules. Advanced Materials, 26(44):7474–7479, 2014. using single-molecule magnets. Nature materials, 7(3):179– [16] Yilei Wu, Matthew D. Krzyaniak, J. Fraser Stoddart, and 186, 2008. Michael R. Wasielewski. Spin Frustration in the Triradical Tri- [5] Peter Jacobson, Tobias Herden, Matthias Muenks, Gennadii anion of a Naphthalenediimide Molecular Triangle. Journal of Laskin, Oleg Brovko, Valeri Stepanyuk, Markus Ternes, and the American Chemical Society, 139(8):2948–2951, 2017. Klaus Kern. Quantum engineering of spin and anisotropy in [17] J. Fransson, M. G. Kang, Y. Yoon, S. Xiao, Y. Ochiai, J. L. magnetic molecular junctions. Nature Communications, 6:1–6, Reno, N. Aoki, and J. P. Bird. Tuning the fano resonance with 2015. an intruder continuum. Nano Letters, 14(2):788–793, 2014. [6] T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich. Antiferro- [18] Juan David Vasquez Jaramillo. Thermoelectric Response of magnetic spintronics. Nature Nanotechnology, 11(3):231–241, Magnetically Controlled Molecular Junctions . Uppsala, 2017. 2016. [19] Amnon Aharony, Yasuhiro Tokura, Guy Z. Cohen, Ora Entin- [7] Benjamin W. Heinrich, Lukas Braun, Jose I. Pascual, and Wohlman, and Shingo Katsumoto. Filtering and analyzing Katharina J. Franke. Tuning the Magnetic Anisotropy of Single mobile qubit information via Rashba-Dresselhaus- Aharonov- Molecules. Nano Letters, 15(6):4024–4028, 2015. Bohm interferometers. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter [8] Juan David Vasquez Jaramillo, Henning Hammar, and Jonas and Materials Physics, 84(3):1–12, 2011. Fransson. Electronically Mediated Magnetic Anisotropy in Vi- [20] Matisse Wei Yuan Tu, Wei Min Zhang, Jinshuang Jin, O. Entin- brating Magnetic Molecules. ACS Omega, 3:6546–6553, 2018. Wohlman, and A. Aharony. Transient quantum transport in [9] Alexander Ako Khajetoorians, Jens Wiebe, Bruno Chilian, double-dot Aharonov-Bohm interferometers. Physical Review Samir Lounis, Stefan Blügel, and Roland Wiesendanger. Atom- B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 86(11):1–10, by-atom engineering and magnetometry of tailored nanomag- 2012. nets. Nature Physics, 8(6):497–503, 2012. [21] Shlomi Matityahu, Amnon Aharony, Ora Entin-Wohlman, [10] T Saygun, J Bylin, H Hammar, and J Fransson. Voltage- and Seigo Tarucha. Spin filtering in a Rashba-Dresselhaus- Induced Switching Dynamics of a Coupled Spin Pair in a Aharonov-Bohm double-dot interferometer. New Journal of Molecular Junction. Nano Letters, 16(4):2824–2829, 2016. Physics, 15, 2013. [11] J. D. Vasquez Jaramillo and J. Fransson. Charge Transport [22] Matisse Wei Yuan Tu, Amnon Aharony, Wei Min Zhang, and and Entropy Production Rate in Magnetically Active Molecular Ora Entin-Wohlman. Real-time dynamics of spin-dependent Dimer. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 121(49):27357– transport through a double-quantum-dot Aharonov-Bohm in- 27368, 2017. terferometer with spin-orbit interaction. Physical Review B - [12] Jonas Fransson. Non-Equilibrium Nano-Physics, volume 809. Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 90(16):1–16, 2014. 9

[23] Jian Heng Liu, Matisse Wei Yuan Tu, and Wei Min Zhang. Fuhr, Daniel Secker, Karin Fink, Mario Ruben, and Heiko B. Quantum coherence of the molecular states and their corre- Weber. Switching of a coupled spin pair in a single-molecule sponding currents in nanoscale Aharonov-Bohm interferome- junction. Nature Nanotechnology, 8(8):575–579, 2013. ters. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials [27] M I Katsnelson and A I Lichtenstein. Magnetic susceptibility, Physics, 94(4):1–10, 2016. exchange interactions and spin-wave spectra in the local spin [24] Juan David Vasquez Jaramillo. Probing Magnetism at the density approximation. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, Atomic Scale : Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics Theo- 16(41):7439–7446, 2004. retical Treatise. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Upp- [28] A. Secchi, S. Brener, A. I. Lichtenstein, and M. I. Katsnelson. sala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology Non-equilibrium magnetic interactions in strongly correlated - ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS, Uppsala, 2018. systems. Annals of Physics, 333:221–271, 2013. [25] Eduardo Fradkin. Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physics. [29] J. Fransson, D. Thonig, P. F. Bessarab, S. Bhattacharjee, Cambridge University Press2013, Cambridge, UK, second edi- J. Hellsvik, and L. Nordstr¨om. Microscopic theory for coupled tion, 2013. atomistic magnetization and lattice dynamics. Physical Review [26] Stefan Wagner, Ferdinand Kisslinger, Stefan Ballmann, Frank Materials, 1(7):074404, 2017. Schramm, Rajadurai Chandrasekar, Tilmann Bodenstein, Olaf