Rushcliffe Biodiversity Opportunity Mapping Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
DRAFT Greater Nottingham Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategy
DRAFT Greater Nottingham Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategy July 2021 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 8 3. Blue-Green Infrastructure Priorities and Principles 18 4. National and Local Planning Policies 23 5. Regional and Local Green Infrastructure Strategies 28 6. Existing Blue-Green Infrastructure Assets 38 7. Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategic Networks 62 8. Ecological Networks 71 9. Synergies between Ecological and the Blue-Green Infrastructure Network 89 Appendix A: BGI Corridor Summaries 92 Appendix B: Biodiversity Connectivity Maps 132 Appendix C: Biodiversity Opportunity Areas 136 Appendix D: Natural Environment Assets 140 Appendix D1: Sites of Special Scientific Interest 141 Appendix D2: Local Nature Reserves 142 Appendix D3: Local Wildlife Sites 145 Appendix D4: Non-Designated 159 1 Appendix E: Recreational Assets 169 Appendix E1: Children’s and Young People’s Play Space 170 Appendix E2: Outdoor Sports Pitches 178 Appendix E3: Parks and Gardens 192 Appendix E4: Allotments 199 Appendix F: Blue Infrastructure 203 Appendix F1: Watercourses 204 2 1. Introduction Objectives of the Strategy 1.1 The Greater Nottingham authorities have determined that a Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) Strategy is required to inform both the Greater Nottingham Strategic Plan (Local Plan Part 1) and the development of policies and allocations within it. This strategic plan is being prepared by Broxtowe Borough Council, Gedling Borough Council, Nottingham City Council and Rushcliffe Borough Council. It will also inform the Erewash Local Plan which is being progressed separately. For the purposes of this BGI Strategy the area comprises the administrative areas of: Broxtowe Borough Council; Erewash Borough Council; Gedling Borough Council; Nottingham City Council; and Rushcliffe Borough Council. -
Leicestershire and Leicester City Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
Leicestershire and Leicester City Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report October 2017 This page has intentionally been left blank 2017s5956 Level 1 SFRA Final v1.0.docx i JBA Project Manager Claire Gardner The Library St Philips Courtyard Church Hill COLESHILL Warwickshire B46 3AD Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Rev 1.0 / June 2017 DRAFT for comment Commissioning authorities Rev 2.0 / June 2017 Minor typo corrections, Commissioning authorities updated with climate change Environment Agency information and flood risk management information Rev 1.0 / September 2017 FINAL DRAFT for comment Commissioning authorities Environment Agency Rev 1.0 / October 2017 FINAL Commissioning authorities Contract This report describes work commissioned by the non-unitary authorities of Leicestershire, Leicester City Council and Leicestershire County Council. The Council’s joint representative for the contract was David Nash, Strategic Planning Consultant supporting the Joint Strategic Planning Manager for the County and Districts of Leicestershire, Leicester City and the LLEP. Prepared by .................................................. Sophie Dusting BSc MEPS Analyst Freyja Scarborough BSc MSc Assistant Analyst Reviewed by ................................................. Claire Gardner BSc MSc MCIWEM C.WEM Chartered Senior Analyst Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for the client. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other -
Leicestershire and Leicester City Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
Leicestershire and Leicester City Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report October 2017 This page has intentionally been left blank 2017s5956 Level 1 SFRA Final v2.0.docx i JBA Project Manager Claire Gardner The Library St Philips Courtyard Church Hill COLESHILL Warwickshire B46 3AD Revision History Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Rev 1.0 / June 2017 DRAFT for comment Commissioning authorities Rev 2.0 / June 2017 Minor typo corrections, Commissioning authorities updated with climate change Environment Agency information and flood risk management information Rev 1.0 / September 2017 FINAL DRAFT for comment Commissioning authorities Environment Agency Rev 1.0 / October 2017 FINAL Commissioning authorities Rev 2.0 / October 2017 FINAL updated with minor Commissioning authorities text amendments Contract This report describes work commissioned by the non-unitary authorities of Leicestershire, Leicester City Council and Leicestershire County Council. The Council’s joint representative for the contract was David Nash, Strategic Planning Consultant supporting the Joint Strategic Planning Manager for the County and Districts of Leicestershire, Leicester City and the LLEP. Prepared by .................................................. Sophie Dusting BSc MEPS Analyst Freyja Scarborough BSc MSc Assistant Analyst Reviewed by ................................................. Claire Gardner BSc MSc MCIWEM C.WEM Chartered Senior Analyst Purpose This document has been prepared as a Final Report for the client. JBA Consulting -
Flooding Survey June 1990 Lower Trent Catchment
Flooding Survey June 1990 Lower Trent Catchment NRA National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region RIVER CATCHMENT AREAS E n v i r o n m e n t Ag e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House. Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD W1SLSH NRA C ard iff WESSEX • NRA B ristol r* Severn-Trent Region Boundary Catchment Boundaries Adjacent NRA Regions 1. Upper Severn 2. Lower Severn 3. Avon 4. Soar 5. Lower Trent 6. Derwent 7. Upper Trent 8. Tame National Rivers Authority Severn-Trent Region FLOODING SURVEY JUNE 1990 SECTION 136(1) WATER ACT 1989 (Supersedes Section 24(5) W ater A ct 1973 Land Drainage Survey dated January 1986) LOWER TRENT CATCHMENT AND NOTTINGHAMSHIRE FLOOD DEFENCE DEPARTMENT bv'v-u’onment Agency NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORrTY SEVERN-TRENT REGION information Centre SAPPHIRE EAST Head Office 550 STREETSBROOK ROAD SOUHULL Class N o W MIDLANDS B91 1QT ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Accession No 099803 CONTENTS Contents List of Tables List of Associated Reports List of Appendices References Glossary of Terms Preface CHAPTER 1 SUMMARY 1.1 Introducti on 1.2 Coding System 1.3 Priority Categories 1.4 Summary of Problem Evaluations 1.5 Summary by Priority Category 1.6 Identification of Problems and their Evaluation CHAPTER 2 THE SURVEY 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Purposes of Survey 2.3 Extent of Survey 2.4 Procedure 2.5 Hydrological Criteria 2.6 Hydraulic Criteria 2.7 Land potential Category 2.8 Improvement Costs 2.9 Benefit Assessment 2.10 Test Oiscount Rate 2.11 Benefit/Cost Ratios 2.12 Priority Category 2.13 -
Natural Environment Research Council British Geological Survey
Natural Environment Research Council British Geological Survey Onshore Geology Series TECHNICAL REPORT WN97146 Geology of the West Leake area 1:lO 000 sheet SK 52 NW Part of 150 000 sheet 141 (Loughborough) and 142 (Melton Mowbray) J N CARNEY and A H COOPER Geographical index UK, West Leake, East Leake, Ratcliffe on Soar, Sutton Bonington, North-West Leicestershire Subject index Geology, Dinantian, Namurian, Sherwood Sandstone, Mercia Mudstone, Cropwell Bishop Formation, Tutbury Gypsum, Newark Gypsum, Scunthrope Mudstone, Quaternary Drift Bibliographical reference Gamey, J N and Cooper, A H. Geology of the West Leake area (SK 42 NW). British Geological Survey Technical Report WA/97/40 b (0)NERC copyright 1997 Keyworth, Nottingham, British Geological Survey 1997 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available Parent Body through the Sales Desks at Keyworth and at Murchison House, Edinburgh, and in the BGS Natural Environment Research Council London Information Office in the Natural History Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon, Museum Earth Galleries. The adjacent bookshop Wiltshire SN2 1EU. stocks the more popular books for sale over the Telephone 01793 411500 counter. Most BGS books and reports are listed in Telex 444293 ENVRE G HMSO’s Sectional List 45, and can be bought FaX 01793 411501 from HMSO and through HMSO agents and retailers. Maps are listed in the BGS Map Catalogue, and can be bought from Ordnance Kingsley Dunham Centre Survey agents as well as from BGS. Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG. Telephone 0115 936 3100 The British Geological Survey carries out the Telex 378173 BGSKEY G geological survey of Great Britain and Northern FaX 0115 936 3200 Ireland (the latter as an agency service for the government of Northern Ireland), and of the Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh surrounding continental she& as well as its basic EH9 3LA. -
Rushcliffe BOM Report 2015
The Rushcliffe Biodiversity Opportunity Mapping Report July 2015 - 1 - The Rushcliffe Biodiversity Opportunity Mapping Project Credits: Report produced by Chris Jackson (Nottinghamshire Biodiversity Action Group) and Nick Crouch (Nottinghamshire County Council), with mapping and data analysis undertaken by Chris Jackson (Nottinghamshire Biodiversity Action Group), Abigail Smith (Nottinghamshire County Council) and Karen Taylor (Nottinghamshire County Council). Funding: This report was possible in part due to funding by Rushcliffe Borough Council and contributions from the Environment Agency and the Trent Vale Landscape Partnership. - 2 - 1. Aim of the Project The aim of this project is to produce a Biodiversity Opportunity Map (BOM) for the Borough of Rushcliffe. This report will also help to underpin the wider work of the Nottinghamshire Biodiversity Action Group (BAG), the Local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP) partnership for Nottinghamshire. 2. Background and context to the Project In 2008 the Nottinghamshire BAG resolved to produce a Biodiversity Opportunity Map for the County, in order to: • Help us have a better understanding of the current distribution of biodiversity in the County • Provide a spatial vision for how partners want the biodiversity of the County to look in the long and medium term • Identify the most effective way to re-create habitat networks at a landscape- scale • Help to focus partners’ resources on optimising biodiversity gain • Help to deliver our contribution to the England Biodiversity Strategy, such as for -
SCI-Consultation List
Nottinghamshire district councils Government departments and agencies Bassetlaw District Council Highways Agency Gedling Borough Council Valuation Office Agency Mansfield District Council Defence Estates (Safeguarding) Newark and Sherwood District Council Heart of England Tourist Board Rushcliffe Borough Council Yorkshire Forward Ashfield District Council East Midlands Development Agency Broxtowe Borough Council Sport England Crown Estate Commissioners – Agricultural Estates Civil Aviation Authority Other minerals and waste planning East Midlands Planning Aid authorities Forest Enterpri se Peak Park Joint Planning Board English Heritage (East Midlands Region) Derbyshire County Council British Waterways Lincolnshire County Council Forestry Commission Derby City Council Department of Trade & Industry Leicester City Council National Air Traffic Services North Lincolnshire Council Coal Authority Nottingham City Council Countryside Agency Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Environment Agency Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Department for Environment, Food and Leicestershire County Council Rural Affairs English Nature (E Midlands Team) Northamptonshire County Council Nottingham Valuation Office Rutland County Council Government Office for the East Midlands Ministry of Defence British Geological Survey Adjacent district councils Health & Safety Executive Amber Valley District Council Department for Culture, Media and Sport N W Leicestershire D C East Midlands Public Health Group West Lindsey District Council East Midlands Regional -
Final Infrastructure Delivery Plan VERSION 3 DRAFT 240513 NO Track
Greater Nottingham Broxtowe Borough Council Erewash Borough Council Gedling Borough Council Nottingham City Council Rushcliffe Borough Council Infrastructure Delivery Plan May 2013 (Version 3) This page is intentionally blank Broxtowe, Erewash, Gedling, Nottingham City and Rushcliffe Infrastructure Delivery Plan Contents Page Executive Summary 2 Part One - Context 1. Purpose of the Plan 4 2. Joint Working Arrangements and Governance 5 3. Scope and Status 6 4. Policy Context 7 5. Engagement and Consultation 11 6. Infrastructure Topic Areas 11 Part 2 - Infrastructure Assessment and Viability 7. Infrastructure Assessment by category a) Strategic Transport 13 b) Utilities - Water 33 c) Utilities - Energy 39 d) Utilities - Digital Infrastructure 49 e) Flooding and Flood Risk 51 f) Health and Local Services 61 g) Education 68 h) Emergency Services (police, fire and ambulance) 78 i) Waste Management (Collection and Disposal) 84 j) Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity 89 k) Heritage Assets 95 8. Strategic Site Schedules 100 9. Viability 208 Part 3 – Infrastructure Schedule, Funding, Monitoring and Review 10. Erewash, Broxtowe, Gedling, Nottingham and Rushcliffe Strategic Infrastructure Schedule 218 11. Funding and Complementary Programmes 235 12. Monitoring and Review 238 Appendix A - Consultees 239 Appendix B - NRL Viability Assessment 240 Appendix C - Summary of main changes from Versions 1 and 2 268 Contacts and Further Information 270 1 Broxtowe, Erewash, Gedling, Nottingham City and Rushcliffe Infrastructure Delivery Plan Executive Summary This Infrastructure Delivery Plan accompanies the Core Strategies of Broxtowe, Erewash, Gedling, Nottingham and Rushcliffe Councils. It considers a range of infrastructure categories and the extent to which each is a constraint to the delivery of the Core Strategies. -
Kingston Brook – Our Concerns from Wikipedia: Kingston Brook Is a Small River in Central England
Kingston Brook – our concerns From Wikipedia: Kingston Brook is a small river in central England. It arises near Old Dalby, Leicestershire on the northern edge of the ridge running from Normanton-on-Soar, Nottinghamshire to Belvoir, Leicestershire. It runs through Willoughby on the Wolds, to the south of Wysall (where it picks up a number of minor tributaries), Costock, East Leake (where it is joined by Sheepwash Brook), West Leake and meets the River Soar near Kingston-on-Soar. The information for this poster is taken from: 1) two studies of the ecological and habitat quality of Kingston Brook undertaken by Ian Morrissey in 2002 and 2012, and a summary survey he carried out in 2018. 2) An archaeological survey by Ursilla Spence (County Archaeologist) and Emily Gillott (Community Archaeologist) in 2016. Kingston Brook forms the centrepiece of Meadow Park, flowing from Gotham Road for approximately 600m before its exit from the park under the Great Central Railway line. In the park there are three bridges over the brook; Heron Bridge, Kestrel Bridge and Kingfisher Bridge. Healthy stream systems are major contributors to local biodiversity as they provide habitat for fish, aquatic macro-invertebrates (e.g. crayfish, snails and aquatic life stages of insects such as dragonflies and mayflies), aquatic plants which in turn support a wide variety of aquatic mammals (otters, water voles) and birds. However, the Kingston Brook currently suffers from both habitat and water quality issues which result in a water- course that falls someway short of its potential as an ecological diversity hotspot within Meadow Park. -
Rushcliffe Nature Conservation Strategy 2021 – 2025 FOREWORD
OFFICIAL Rushcliffe Nature Conservation Strategy 2021 – 2025 FOREWORD On 28 September 2020, Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP, Prime Minister of the UK, signed the Leaders Pledge for Nature, at the United Nations Summit on Biodiversity along with 64 other countries, seeking to reverse Biodiversity Loss by 2030. The pledge states: “We are in a state of planetary emergency: the interdependent crises of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation and climate change”. The Chartered Institute for Ecology and Environmental Management (CIEEM) states “that the climate emergency and biodiversity crisis are inextricably linked and must be addressed together. Restoring biodiversity has the potential to … mitigate against the effects of climate change, through enhancing carbon-storing habitats”. CIEEM called for “action … through nature-based solutions”. The community have a great deal of interest in the natural environment of Rushcliffe, when residents are aware that sensitive wildlife sites are threatened, they are quick to show their concern. Public interest must be translated from words to action. Everyone has a responsibility to do their bit and this strategy outlines actions that statutory and voluntary organisations, businesses and individuals working together can implement. This strategy not only sets out to try to safeguard existing known sites of interest, but also to encourage the creation of new sites, while seeking to address the Climate Emergency and Biodiversity Crisis. The strategy also seeks to preserve the existing links between wildlife sites and to establish new links to allow the spread of wild native plants and animals. The objective of the strategy is not only to benefit wildlife; visitors and residents will also benefit through the opportunities to observe and enjoy nature. -
Greater Nottingham Scoping Water Cycle Study
Greater Nottingham New Growth Point Partnership Greater Nottingham Scoping Water Cycle Study May 2009 Prepared for: Greater Nottingham New Growth Point Partnership Greater Nottingham – Scoping Water Cycle Study Revision Schedule Greater Nottingham - Scoping Water Cycle Study May 2009 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 April 2009 Draft Gemma Costin Andrew Woodliffe Jon Robinson Assistant Flood Risk Senior Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Specialist 02 April 2009 Final Gemma Costin Andrew Woodliffe Jon Robinson Assistant Flood Risk Senior Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Specialist 03 May 2009 Final v2 Fay Tivey Andrew Woodliffe Jon Robinson Assistant Flood Risk Senior Flood Risk Associate Director Specialist Specialist Scott Wilson Mansfield i-Centre Oakham Business Park Hamilton Way Mansfield This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's NG18 5BR appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the Tel: 01623 600 660 purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior Fax: 01623 600 661 written permission of the Company Secret ary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole. -
Local Environment Agency Plan
local environment agency plan SOAR CONSULTATION REPORT APRIL1997 ■ NOTTINGHAM ■ GRANTHAM ■ DERBY ■ BURTON UPON TRENT ■ STAMFORD Hlh NUNEATON ■ ■ CORBY COVENTRY YOUR VIEWS ~ The Local Environment Agency Plan (LEAP) process will establish a common vision for the Soar area and provide a framework for protecting and improving our local environment. It will raise local environmental issues and through partnership will direct resources to where they are most needed. The publication of this report marks the start of a three month period of consultation. Following the consultation period the Environment Agency will produce a five year Action Plan. This will outline both the Agency’s and other partners actions within the area. Annual Reviews will report on the progress being made. The LEAP process is ongoing and your voice, your involvement and commitment is requested throughout. What do you think? The Environment Agency welcomes your views on the future management of the area. * Have all the important environmental issues been identified? * Have all the options and solutions to issues been identified? * Is the vision for the area your vision? * Do you have any other information or ideas you would like to express? All comments received will be treated as public information unless you explicitly state otherwise in your response. Following the consultation period all comments received will be considered in preparing the next phase, the Action Plan. The Consultation Report will not be rewritten as part of the Action Plan process. We intend that the plan should influence the policies and action of developers, planning authorities and other organisations as well as assisting in the day to day management of the area.