DOCSLIB.ORG

Homomorphisms Between Verma Modules in Characteristic P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Homomorphisms Between Verma Modules in Characteristic P JOURNAL OF ALGEBRA 112, 58-85 (1988) Homomorphisms between Verma Modules in Characteristic p JAMES FRANKLIN*-' School of Mathematics, University of New South Wales, Kensington 2033, New South Wales, Australia Communicated by Jacques Tits Received April 28, 1986 INTRODUCTION Let g be a complex semisimple Lie algebra, with a Bore1 subalgebra b c g and Cartan subalgebra h c b. In classifying the finite dimensional represen- tations of g, Cartan showed that any simple finite dimensional g-module has a generating element u, annihilated by n = [b, b], on which h acts by a linear form I E h*. Such an element is called a primitive vector (for the module). Harish-Chandra [9] considered g-modules, not necessarily finite dimensional, with a primitive vector, in particular the “universal” modules of this kind, called “Verma modules” by Dixmier [7]. These are construc- ted using the universal enveloping algebra % of g: the Verma module corresponding to I is VA=%! en+ 1 @(A-l(A)) REh -Y; is naturally a 43- (and hence g-) module. By regarding finite dimensional modules as quotients of Verma modules, Harish-Chandra [9] was able to give a uniform proof of the existence of a finite dimensional simple g-module VA (called a Weyl module) for each dominant integral 2. Verma modules were also used in Bernstein, Gel’fand and Gel’fand’s proof of Weyl’s formula for the characters of the V, [2]. Recently they have found uses in analysis as a more calculatory alternative * I am grateful to Professor Roger Carter for constant help and encouragement with this work. + Financial support was provided by the University of Sydney’s James King of Irrawang Travelling Scholarship. 58 0021-8693/88 $3.00 Copyright 0 1988 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. VERMA MODULES IN CHARACTERISTIC p 59 to C*-algebras, via Duflo’s study of the primitive ideals of the universal enveloping algebra [20]. Composition series of Verma modules and homomorphisms between Verma modules were studied by Verma [19] and Bernstein, Gel’fand and Gel’fand [2, 33. Writing p for half the sum of the dominant roots, the Weyl group W of g relative to b has a translated “dot” action on h* defined by w . I = w(A + p) - p (w E W, A E A*). Verma showed that any non-trivial g-homomorphism of Verma modules ^yj -+ VA is injective; that the space of g-homomorphisms “yj -+ $5 is at most one dimensional; and that, if II -s, .A is a positive integral multiple of CI(a a positive root), then there is a non-trivial homomorphism Ys, 1 --t VA. Bernstein, Gel’fand and Gel’fand showed conversely that any non-trivial homomorphism VP -+ ~j, is a com- position of homomorphisms of this form. More strongly, they proved that if VP is a simple composition factor of Y;., then there exist positive roots CI,, .. CI, such that p=ss,,. ... .sZZ.s,,.jb and s,,~,. ..s.,.A- S .s . “‘S,, . E.is a positive integral multiple of c(;for each i = 1, .. Y.The n?ult~&ities of the V,, as composition factors of the %‘j.were conjectured by Kazhdan and Lusztig [ 131 and established in the two papers [ 1,4]. In characteristic p, the situation is not so well understood. Let K be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p. % has a Z-form %YZ(that is, “ZZ is a subring and aZ 0, C = “2) described by Kostant [ 143. The K-algebra aZ 0, K, called the hyperalgebra, has the same finite dimensional representations as the simply connected algebraic group G, corresponding to g (Sullivan [ 181). If 1 is an integral weight (that is, 2”E h* and I(h,) E Z for all positive roots a) then there are Z-forms in $;. and V, (that is, Z-lat- tices closed under multiplication by aZ). These can be tensored with K to form %=modules %& and Vi.,K. The V,,, are not, as over Cc,irreducible. Each VA,, has, however, a unique simple quotient L,,,, and all simple finite dimensional %= (or rational G,) modules occur in this way. Further, any finite dimensional @<module with a primitive vector is a quotient of a ?‘A,K (Jantzen [ 111). TO investigate the Lj.,K it has proved most useful to con- sider the structure of the V,,,. For example, Jantzen [ 111 obtains results on the composition multiplicities of the L,,, in the P’,,,. This article studies homomorphisms between the ?‘&, the Verma modules in characteristic p. Since every non-trivial homomorphism VP -+ Yi is injective, “y; is regarded as a submodule of ?‘i. (when such a homomorphism exists). Then if v1 is a primitive vector of <., there is an element u of @ such that uvj, is a primitive vector of “yj. Such an element is described by Shapovalov [15]. His treatment is extended here by showing that u is in %YZand so can be used to define a homomorphism Yti:,K-+ Y&. By modifying this element, homomorphisms “yj,, + <,,K are defined for certain pairs p, A for which there are no non-trivial homomorphisms “yj -+ q,. The final result (Theorems 5.2 and 6.3) shows: 60 JAMES FRANKLIN For a positive root r and an integral weight A, there exists a non-zero homomorphism VA _ dr + ?‘j. (d E R + ) provided that (A + p)( h,) = Mp’ + d for some MEZ, eEZt, and d< p’/N, where N is almost always 1, but may be 2 or 3 for certain high roots. This result may be interpreted geometrically in terms of the afline Weyl group: a non-zero homomorphism exists between ?.J$and 6. provided p and J. are mirror images in a p’-hyperplane of h*, and the distance of reflection d is not too large-usually, not more than pe. The main purpose of this work is to extend it to derive similar results for homomorphisms between the Weyl modules in characteristic p. A sub- sequent article will derive a result for the I/,,, which is the same as that above for the Verma modules, but with the extra condition that the weight ,4.must be dominant, and also sufliciently far from certain of the walls of the dominant region. 1. PRELIMINARIES g is a complex semi-simple Lie algebra of rank 1, h a Cartan subalgebra of g, h* its dual. @ is the set of roots, Qf the set of positive roots (relative to some base d = {E,, .. a,}). n, = c g”, n.- = 2 g-” and bk=n_+h. Ita’ It@+ W is the Weyl group of @, generated by reflections s,, c1E @+. We take a Chevalley basis of g, {e,(clE@+), f,(ccc@+)), h,(i= 1, .. I)}, with e,Eg’, f,EC, hi= Cc,,,f,,l. Th ere is an ordering relation < on h* defined by >+< A’ if i is a sum of positive roots (equivalently, of simple roots). For rE @+, expressed as a sum of simple roots cf= 1 n+,, the height ht r of r is defined to be If=, ni. If r, r’ E Qt and r < r’ then ht r < ht r’. C!Zis the universal enveloping algebra of g, %(n + ) that of n + , %(n ~ ) of n , @(b ) of b- and 4!(h) of h. There is a tensor product decomposition of % and a direct sum decomposition #: @ + %(b ~ ) is the projection corresponding to this direct sum decom- position. VERMA MODULES IN CHARACTERISTIC/J 61 Since h is commutative, e(h) is isomorphic to S(h), the symmetric algebra on h. Hence 43!(h) can be regarded as the algebra of polynomial functions on h*. Then for any 1 E h *, the map AH A(A), RE h, defines an algebra homomorphism S(h) + C, “evaluation at A.” This extends to a homomorphism %(b_)=@(n-)@%(h)+@(n_). The image of us% under this map is denoted u(A) and is called “the evaluation of u at 1.” Let m= I@+l. The m-tuples rc=((7c(a))!,ED+, with each n(a)EZ+, are called “partitions”; the set of all partitions is denoted p. For n E p, the weight of rc, wt 7c,is defined to be Clea+ n(a) a, and the degree of II, deg Z, is defined to be C,, G+ z(a). The partitions of a fixed weight are thus the different ways in which that weight can be written as a sum of positive roots. We fix some ordering (a,, .. a,) of the positive roots. 1%has a C-basis, the Poincare-Birkhoff-Witt (PBW) basis: {r;,H,E,,: 71,TC’EP, A E (Z’)‘} where K=f,, n(a1).. f,, n(%l) HA=/+...@ if A = (il, .. i,) E,, = e,“;‘“~’ . ,;M. Then the weight of E,, (in the usual sense of the weight of the adjoint representation of h in a) is wt rc’, and the weight of F, is - wt 7~.The degree of F,H, E,. (in the usual sense for a polynomial expression) is deg 7t+ deg H, + deg n’. (The notation here is adapted from Jantzen [ 121 and Humphreys [IO].) LEMMA 1.1. (a) The Z-span of a PBW basis is a ring (denoted ZPBW). (b) If (ZPBW), denotes the ubeliun subgroup of ZPBW generated by the PBW basis elements of degree ar most n, then (ZPBW), (ZPBW),. G W’BW,+n,. (c) vu E ZPBW is u sum of basis elements of the same weight, and u’ is also a sum of basis elements of the same weight, then uu’ us a sum qf basis elements of weight wt u + wt u’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geometric Representation Theory, Fall 2005
    GEOMETRIC REPRESENTATION THEORY, FALL 2005 Some references 1) J. -P. Serre, Complex semi-simple Lie algebras. 2) T. Springer, Linear algebraic groups. 3) A course on D-modules by J. Bernstein, availiable at www.math.uchicago.edu/∼arinkin/langlands. 4) J. Dixmier, Enveloping algebras. 1. Basics of the category O 1.1. Refresher on semi-simple Lie algebras. In this course we will work with an alge- braically closed ground field of characteristic 0, which may as well be assumed equal to C Let g be a semi-simple Lie algebra. We will fix a Borel subalgebra b ⊂ g (also sometimes denoted b+) and an opposite Borel subalgebra b−. The intersection b+ ∩ b− is a Cartan subalgebra, denoted h. We will denote by n, and n− the unipotent radicals of b and b−, respectively. We have n = [b, b], and h ' b/n. (I.e., h is better to think of as a quotient of b, rather than a subalgebra.) The eigenvalues of h acting on n are by definition the positive roots of g; this set will be denoted by ∆+. We will denote by Q+ the sub-semigroup of h∗ equal to the positive span of ∆+ (i.e., Q+ is the set of eigenvalues of h under the adjoint action on U(n)). For λ, µ ∈ h∗ we shall say that λ ≥ µ if λ − µ ∈ Q+. We denote by P + the sub-semigroup of dominant integral weights, i.e., those λ that satisfy hλ, αˇi ∈ Z+ for all α ∈ ∆+. + For α ∈ ∆ , we will denote by nα the corresponding eigen-space.
    [Show full text]
  • Whatsavermamodule?
    whatsaVermaModule? John Calabrese Abstract. In Fall 2017 I taught a course on Lie theory. I wrote notes on Verma modules. These are said notes. All mistakes here are mine and mine only: you cannot have them. How do you cook up representations of a Lie algebra g? One way is using Verma modules. 1. Tensor Products L ⊗k Let V be a vector space. The tensor algebra is TV = k≥0 V . Notice that V⊗0 = C. TV is an associative (unital) algebra. It’s also the “biggest” possible algebra you can cook up from V, in the sense that it is free on dim V generators. Concretely, we have a bijection Ass(TV, B) = Vect(V, B) where B is any other associative (unital1) algebra. So, this means that to specify an algebra map TV ! B it suffices to give a linear map V ! B. In other words, T: Vect ! Ass is “left adjoint” to the forgetful functor Ass ! Vect which forgets multiplication (i.e. takes an algebra and views it as a plain vector space). The tensor algebra is the mother of many constructions. It can be used for a lot of fun stuff. For example, what if we need a commutative algebra built out of V? Well, we take TV and impose commutativity. Let I ⊂ TV be the (bilateral) ideal generated by elements v ⊗ w { w ⊗ v for all v, w 2 V. The quotient TV/I is precisely the symmetric algebra SV, which is a commutative algebra. It satisfies the universal property CAlg(SV, B) = Hom(V, B) where now B is a commutative algebra.
    [Show full text]
  • Weyl-Kac Character Formula for Affine Lie Algebra in Deligne's Category
    WEYL-KAC CHARACTER FORMULA FOR AFFINE LIE ALGEBRA IN DELIGNE'S CATEGORY ALEKSEI PAKHAREV Abstract. We study the characters of simple modules in the parabolic BGG category of the affine Lie algebra in Deligne's category. More specifically, we take the limit of Weyl-Kac formula to compute the character of the irreducible quotient L(X; k) of the parabolic Verma module M(X; k) of level k, where X is an indecomposable object of Deligne's category Rep(GLt), Rep(Ot), or Rep(Spt), under conditions that the highest weight of X plus the level gives a fundamental weight, t is transcendental, and the base field | has character- istic 0. We compare our result to the partial result in [Eti16, Problem 6.2], and evaluate the characters to the categorical dimensions to get a categorical interpretation of the Nekrasov-Okounkov hook length formula, [NO, Formula (6.12)]. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Preliminaries 3 2.1. Partitions, Frobenius coordinates, and bipartitions 3 2.2. Classical linear groups 3 2.3. Deligne's category 5 2.4. Filtrations on Rep(Gn) and Deligne's category 7 2.5. The affine Lie algebra in a tensor category and its BGG category 7 2.6. Standard facts about roots and Weyl group 9 2.7. Data of the usual and the affine Lie algebra 10 2.8. Weyl-Kac formula and Garland formula in the finite case 11 3. Stable Weyl-Kac formula 12 3.1. M(φ) and L(φ) coherence 12 3.2. Limit Dynkin diagrams 13 3.3. Stable alternating sum 15 arXiv:1906.02902v1 [math.RT] 7 Jun 2019 3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • And Associated Verma Modules
    Journal of Algebra 242, 561–576 (2001) doi:10.1006/jabr.2001.8815, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Generalized Verma Modules Induced from provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector sl2 and Associated Verma Modules Oleksandr Khomenko Mathematisches Institut der Universitat¨ Freiburg, Eckestrasse 1, D-79104, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany E-mail: [email protected] and Volodymyr Mazorchuk Department of Mathematics, Chalmers University of Technology and Goteborg¨ University, SE 412 96, Goteborg,¨ Sweden E-mail: [email protected] Communicated by Georgia Benkart Received June 22, 2000 Witheachgeneralized Verma module induced from a “well-embedded” parabolic subalgebra of a Lie algebra withtriangular decomposition, we associate a Verma module over the same algebra in a natural way. In the case when the semisimple part of the Levi factor of the parabolic subalgebra is isomorphic to sl2 and the generalized Verma module is induced from an infinite-dimensional simple module, we prove that the associated Verma module is simple if and only if the original generalized Verma module is simple. © 2001 Academic Press 1. INTRODUCTION AND SETUP Let be a semisimple complex finite-dimensional Lie algebra witha fixed triangular decomposition = − ⊕ ⊕ + and ⊃ ⊕ + a parabolic subalgebra of withtheLevi decomposition =a ⊕ ⊕, where is nilpotent, = ⊕ is reductive, is semisimple, and ⊂ is abelian and central in .Ageneralized Verma module (GVM) is a module of the 561 0021-8693/01 $35.00 Copyright © 2001 by Academic Press All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. 562 khomenko and mazorchuk form MV =U V (1) U where V is a simple -module and V = 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Irreducible Characters for Verma Modules for the Orthosymplectic Lie Superalgebra Osp(3|4)
    Irreducible Characters for Verma Modules for the Orthosymplectic Lie Superalgebra osp(3j4) Honglin Zhu Mentor: Arun S. Kannan Phillips Exeter Academy October 17, 2020 MIT PRIMES Conference Honglin Zhu Irreducible Characters for Verma Modules Oct 17 1 / 18 Definition A Lie algebra L is a vector space endowed with a bilinear map [−; −]: L × L ! L called the Lie bracket. The Lie bracket satisfies two rules: 1 For all x; y 2 L,[x; y] = −[y; x]. 2 For all x; y; z 2 L, [x; [y; z]] + [y; [z; x]] + [z; [x; y]] = 0: What is a Lie algebra? Honglin Zhu Irreducible Characters for Verma Modules Oct 17 2 / 18 1 For all x; y 2 L,[x; y] = −[y; x]. 2 For all x; y; z 2 L, [x; [y; z]] + [y; [z; x]] + [z; [x; y]] = 0: What is a Lie algebra? Definition A Lie algebra L is a vector space endowed with a bilinear map [−; −]: L × L ! L called the Lie bracket. The Lie bracket satisfies two rules: Honglin Zhu Irreducible Characters for Verma Modules Oct 17 2 / 18 2 For all x; y; z 2 L, [x; [y; z]] + [y; [z; x]] + [z; [x; y]] = 0: What is a Lie algebra? Definition A Lie algebra L is a vector space endowed with a bilinear map [−; −]: L × L ! L called the Lie bracket. The Lie bracket satisfies two rules: 1 For all x; y 2 L,[x; y] = −[y; x]. Honglin Zhu Irreducible Characters for Verma Modules Oct 17 2 / 18 What is a Lie algebra? Definition A Lie algebra L is a vector space endowed with a bilinear map [−; −]: L × L ! L called the Lie bracket.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Entitled on Weight Modules Over Sl2 by Hanh Nguyen
    A Thesis entitled On weight modules over sl2 by Hanh Nguyen Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts in Mathematics Dr. Akaki Tikaradze, Committee Chair Dr. Gerard Thompson, Committee Member Dr. Mao-Pei Tsui, Committee Member Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo August 2013 Copyright 2013, Hanh Nguyen This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of On weight modules over sl2 by Hanh Nguyen Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts in Mathematics The University of Toledo August 2013 An important class of representations of sl2 consists of weight modules. The goal of this thesis is to give a self-contained exposition of the classification of simple weight modules over C. iii Acknowledgments I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor Professor Akaki Tikaradze. Without his guidance and persistent help, this thesis would not have been possible. I would also like to offer special thanks to my loving family, especially my husband Trieu Le for his encouragement and help. Last but not least, I would like to thank my professors and friends for all the support. iv Contents Abstract iii Acknowledgments iv Contents v 1 Basic Definitions and Introduction 1 2 Universal Enveloping Algebras 9 3 Verma modules and their quotients 11 3.1 sl2-modules which have a maximal or a minimal vector .
    [Show full text]
  • Verma Module Lmbeddings and the Bruhat Order for Kac-Moody Algebras*
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector JOURNAL OF ALGEBRA 109, 430-438 (1987) Verma Module lmbeddings and the Bruhat Order for Kac-Moody Algebras* WAYNE NEIDHARDT~ Department of Mathemntics and Computw Science, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts 01610 Communicated by Nathan Jacobson Received September 5, 1985 Let g be a Kac-Moody algebra defined by a (not necessarily symmetrizable) generalized Cartan matrix. It is shown that the existence of an imbedding of Verma modules over g, where the two highest weights both lie in the Weyl group orbit of a dominant integral weight, is determined by the Bruhat order on the Weyl group. Also, some general results relating Verma module imbeddings and the Weyl group are proved. 0 1987 Academic Press, Inc. 1. INTRODUCTION The question of what Verma module imbeddings occur over finite dimensional split semisimple Lie algebras over fields of characteristic zero was settled in [l, Theorems 2 and 31, where it was shown that such imbed- dings are determined by the Bruhat order on the Weyl group. For the case of Kac-Moody algebras, which are infinite dimensional generalizations of the finite dimensional split semisimple algebras, the question is not so sim- ple, due to the fact that Verma module imbeddings exist where the highest weights are not in the same Weyl group orbit (under the “dot” action). When the Kac-Moody algebra is defined by a symmetrizable generalized Cartan matrix, a condition on highest weights is given in [3, Theorem 4.21 which is necessary and sufficient for the existence of a Verma module imbedding.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermann Weyl - Space-Time-Matter
    - As far as I see, all a priori statements in physics have their origin in ... http://www.markus-maute.de/trajectory/trajectory.html Free counter and web stats Music of the week (Spanish): Home | Akivis Algebra Abstract Algebra *-Algebra (4,3) - Association Type Identities (4,2) - Association Type Identities (4,2) - Association Type Identities Taking the identities with , for each of them we can replace the element in one of the positions by another one. I.e. there are identities of rank all in all. These are also given in [1] and to facilitate comparisons, we'll list the labelling used there as well. Identity Abbreviation [1] Type of Quasigroup Right-alternative Right-alternative Jordan identity Trivial if right-alternative Trivial if flexible Trivial if left-alternative Trivial if mono-associative Jordan identity Trivial if mono-associative Trivial if right-alternative Trivial if flexible Trivial if left-alternative Jordan identity Jordan identity Due to the property of unique resolvability of quasigroups. Furthermore we can replace two elements by two other identical elements. For each identity there are inequivalent ways of doing so. Hence we get another rank- identities, listed in the following table: Identity Abbreviation [1] Type of Quasigroup Trivial if left-alternative Trivial if flexible 1 of 80 28.01.2015 18:08 - As far as I see, all a priori statements in physics have their origin in ... http://www.markus-maute.de/trajectory/trajectory.html Trivial if right-alternative Trivial if right-alternative Trivial if flexible Trivial if left-alternative See also: Association type identities (4,3) - association type identities Google books: [1] Geometry and Algebra of Multidimensional Three-webs (1992) - M.
    [Show full text]
  • Staggered and Affine Kac Modules Over A1(1)
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Nuclear Physics B 950 (2020) 114865 www.elsevier.com/locate/nuclphysb (1) Staggered and affine Kac modules over A1 Jørgen Rasmussen School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia Received 22 May 2019; received in revised form 13 November 2019; accepted 20 November 2019 Available online 26 November 2019 Editor: Hubert Saleur Abstract (1) This work concerns the representation theory of the affine Lie algebra A1 at fractional level and its links to the representation theory of the Virasoro algebra. We introduce affine Kac modules as certain finitely generated submodules of Wakimoto modules. We conjecture the existence of several classes of staggered (1) A1 -modules and provide evidence in the form of detailed examples. We extend the applicability of the Goddard-Kent-Olive coset construction to include the affine Kac and staggered modules. We introduce an (1) exact functor between the associated category of A1 -modules and the corresponding category of Virasoro modules. At the level of characters, its action generalises the Mukhi-Panda residue formula. We also obtain (1) explicit expressions for all irreducible A1 -characters appearing in the decomposition of Verma modules, re-examine the construction of Malikov-Feigin-Fuchs vectors, and extend the Fuchs-Astashkevich theorem (1) from the Virasoro algebra to A1 . © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP3. 1. Introduction Kac-Moody algebras [1–3]were introduced half a century ago and include the (infinite- dimensional) affine Lie algebras frequently appearing in theoretical and mathematical physics, including conformal field theory [4–6] and string theory [7,8].
    [Show full text]
  • Exercises for Week 6?
    sl 1 Exercises for week 6? Proof of Serre’s theorem 1. (Warmup) Let V be a vector space and F (V ) the free lie algebra. Prove that F (V ) is spanned by brackets of the form [x1; [x2; [::: [xn−1; xn] :::]]]: 2. (Optional) Recall (from the proof done in class) that P + is spanned by brackets of − raising operators xβ, P is spanned by brackets of lowering operators yβ, and H is + − spanned by hβ, for β 2 ∆. Finish the proof that P = P + H + P . Recall that this + involved showing, e.g., that for y = yβ, and x a bracket in P , that [y; x] is either another bracket in P +, or is in H. 3. (Mandatory) Prove the following: If λ 2 h∗ and λ2 = R · α for α 2 Φ, then there exists w 2 W such that wλ ⊀ 0 and 0 ⊀ wλ. That is, wλ has both positive and negative coefficients when written in terms of the base ∆. Verma Modules and irreducibles 1. (Mandatory) (a) Prove that every submodule of a Verma module is a weight module. (b) Is the following statement true: let V be a representation of g (complex semisimple lie algebra) which is weight, with finite dimensional weight spaces, where the set of weights of V is locally bounded above with respect to ≺. (That is, for each weight of V , the number of other weights of V which are higher is finite.) Then every submodule of V has the same property. 2. (Optional) Suppose that λ is a dominant weight. Finish the proof that each lowering operator yα, α 2 ∆ acts locally nilpotently on the quotient ∆λ=Nλ, where Nλ is gener- hλ,βi+1 ated by yβ v+ for each β 2 ∆.
    [Show full text]
  • ON REPRESENTATIONS of the AFFINE SUPERALGEBRA Q(N)(2)
    ON REPRESENTATIONS OF THE AFFINE SUPERALGEBRA q(n)(2) MARIA GORELIK AND VERA SERGANOVA Abstract. In this paper we study highest weight representations of the affine Lie su- peralgebra q(n)(2). We prove that any Verma module over this algebra is reducible and calculate the character of an irreducible q(n)(2)- module with a generic highest weight. This formula is analogous to the Kac-Kazhdan formula for generic irreducible modules over affine Lie algebras at the critical level. 1. Introduction 1.1. Due to the existence of the Casimir operator a Verma module over a Kac-Moody superalgebra with a symmetrizable Cartan matrix is irreducible if its highest weight is generic. In this paper we study the structure of Verma modules over the twisted affine superal- gebra q(n)(2), n ≥ 3. This superalgebra has a non-symmetrizable Cartan matrix. We will see that any Verma module over it is reducible. We prove that a simple highest weight q(n)(2)-module with a “generic” highest weight λ has the following character formula: (1) ch L(λ)= eλ (1 − e−α)−1 (1 + e−α). Y Y α∈∆ˆ + α∈∆ˆ + re,0 1 Here genericity means that λ lie in the compliment to countably many hypersurfaces in hˆ∗. This formula is analogous to the Kac-Kazhdan character formula, see below. 1.1.1. Let gˆ be a complex affine Lie algebra. A Verma module with a generic weight at non-critical level is irreducible. A Verma module at the critical level is always reducible; if λ is a generic weight at the critical level then the simple module L(λ) has the following λ −α −1 character: ch L(λ) = e + (1 − e ) .
    [Show full text]
  • Extension of the Category Og and a Vanishing Theorem for the Ext Functor for Kac-Moody Algebras
    JOURNAL OF ALGEBRA 108, 472491 (1987) Extension of the Category Og and a Vanishing Theorem for the Ext Functor for Kac-Moody Algebras SHRAWAN KUMAR Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute qf Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts and Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay, India Communicated by J. Tits Received July 15, 1985 INTRODUCTION We extend the equivalence relation z (resp. the category OR) (defined in [DGK]) from Kg to an, in general, much larger subset Pg. c b* (resp. to the category ~3’“.~.),where w.g. stands for “weakly good”. We denote the extended equivalence relation by x ‘. We prove that the equivalence classes in Pa. under Z’ have description exactly similar to that for the equivalence classes in Kg under x, given by Deodhar-Gabber-Kac. We also prove that their category decomposition theorem for UR can be extended to CY8.. We further prove that Extz(M, N) = 0, if M and NE 0 (resp. in C!Yg.)are of inequivalent - (resp. = “) types. Now we describe the contents in more detail. Unless otherwise stated, g will denote an arbitrary symmetrizable Kac-Moody Lie algebra with its Cartan subalgebra fj. Section 1. Fix II, p E h*. Let us say that 2 is related to ,u if the irreducible module L(A) is a subquotient of the Verma module M(p) and denote by - the equivalence relation thus generated. BernsteinGelfand-Gelfand, using central character theory, gave a necessary and sufficient condition for 2 to be related to p, in the case when g is finite dimensional [BGG]. Later Jantzen [J] simplified their proof, by making use of the Shapovalov bilinear form.
    [Show full text]