orbit. Response article How to Cite: Kelly, A 2017 David Foster Wallace and New Sincerity Aesthetics: A Reply to Edward Jackson and Joel Nicholson-Roberts. Orbit: A Journal of American Literature, 5(2): 4, pp. 1–32, DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/ orbit.224 Published: 08 August 2017 Peer Review: This is a non-peer-reviewed response piece. Since the article responds to another published in Orbit, blind peer review was impossible. This piece was reviewed by an editor of the journal. Copyright: © 2017 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Open Access: Orbit: A Journal of American Literature is a peer-reviewed open access journal. Digital Preservation: The Open Library of Humanities and all its journals are digitally preserved in the CLOCKSS scholarly archive service. The Open Library of Humanities is an open access non-profit publisher of scholarly articles and monographs. Adam Kelly, ‘David Foster Wallace and New Sincerity Aesthetics: A Reply to Edward Jackson and Joel Nicholson-Roberts’ (2017) . orbit 5(2): 4 Orbit: A Journal of American Literature, DOI: https:// doi.org/10.16995/orbit.224 RESPONSE ARTICLE David Foster Wallace and New Sincerity Aesthetics: A Reply to Edward Jackson and Joel Nicholson-Roberts Adam Kelly University of York, GB
[email protected] This essay responds to the critique of my work advanced by Edward Jackson and Joel Nicholson-Roberts in “White Guys: Questioning Infinite Jest’s New Sincerity,” published in Orbit in March 2017.