Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
DOE/EIS-0360 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A DEPLETED URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE CONVERSION FACILITY AT THE PORTSMOUTH, OHIO, SITE Volume 1: Main Text and Appendixes A−H June 2004 U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Cover Sheet Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Final EIS COVER SHEET* RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Environmental Impact Statement for Construction and Operation of a Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Conversion Facility at the Portsmouth, Ohio, Site (DOE/EIS-0360) CONTACT: For further information on this environmental impact statement (EIS), contact: Gary S. Hartman DOE-ORO Cultural Resources Management Coordinator U.S. Department of Energy-Oak Ridge Operations P.O. Box 2001 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 e-mail: [email protected] phone: 1-866-530-0944 fax: 1-866-530-0943 For general information on the DOE National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process, contact: Carol Borgstrom, Director Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (EH-42) U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 202-586-4600, or leave message at 1-800-472-2756 ABSTRACT: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) proposes, via a contract awarded at the direction of Congress (Public Law 107-206), to design, construct, and operate two conversion facilities for converting depleted uranium hexafluoride (commonly referred to as DUF6): one at Portsmouth, Ohio, and one at Paducah, Kentucky. DOE intends to use the proposed facilities to convert its inventory of DUF6 to a more stable chemical form suitable for beneficial use or disposal. This site-specific EIS analyzes the construction, operation, maintenance, and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) of the proposed DUF6 conversion facility at three alternative locations within the Portsmouth site; transportation of all cylinders (DUF6, enriched, and empty) currently stored at the East Tennessee Technology Park (ETTP) near Oak Ridge, Tennessee, to Portsmouth; construction of a new cylinder storage yard at Portsmouth (if required) for ETTP cylinders; transportation of depleted uranium conversion products and waste materials to a disposal facility; transportation and sale of the hydrogen fluoride (HF) produced as a conversion co- product; and neutralization of HF to calcium fluoride (CaF2) and its sale or disposal in the event that the HF product is not sold. This EIS also considers a no action alternative that assumes continued storage of DUF6 at the Portsmouth and ETTP sites. A separate EIS has been prepared for the proposed facility at Paducah (DOE/EIS-0359). DOE’s preferred alternative is to construct and operate the conversion facility at Location A within the Portsmouth site. DOE plans to decide where to dispose of depleted U3O8 conversion product after additional appropriate NEPA review. * Vertical lines in the right margin of this cover sheet and in the remainder of this EIS document indicate changes that have been added after the public comment period. iii Contents Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Final EIS CONTENTS COVER SHEET.................................................................................................................... iii NOTATION .......................................................................................................................... xxv ENGLISH/METRIC AND METRIC/ENGLISH EQUIVALENTS..................................... xxx SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... S-1 S.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ S-1 S.1.1 Background Information........................................................................... S-1 S.1.1.1 Creation of USEC...................................................................... S-5 S.1.1.2 Growing Concern over the DUF6 Inventory............................. S-6 S.1.1.3 Programmatic NEPA Review and Congressional Interest........ S-7 S.1.1.4 DOE Request for Contractor Proposals and Site-Specific NEPA Review...................................................... S-8 S.1.1.5 Public Law 107-206 Passed by Congress.................................. S-9 S.1.1.6 Characteristics of DUF6 ............................................................ S-10 S.1.2 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................... S-11 S.1.3 Proposed Action........................................................................................ S-11 S.1.4 Scope......................................................................................................... S-12 S.1.5 Public Review of the Draft EIS ................................................................ S-12 S.1.6 Relationship to Other NEPA Reviews...................................................... S-13 S.1.7 Organization of This Environmental Impact Statement ........................... S-14 S.2 Alternatives........................................................................................................... S-14 S.2.1 No Action Alternative............................................................................... S-14 S.2.2 Proposed Action Alternatives................................................................... S-16 S.2.2.1 Alternative Location A (Preferred Alternative) ........................ S-17 S.2.2.2 Alternative Location B .............................................................. S-19 S.2.2.3 Alternative Location C .............................................................. S-19 S.2.2.4 Conversion Process Description................................................ S-19 S.2.2.5 Preparation and Transportation of ETTP Cylinders to Portsmouth............................................................ S-22 S.2.2.6 Construction of a New Cylinder Storage Yard at Portsmouth............................................................................. S-24 S.2.2.7 Option of Shipping ETTP Cylinders to Paducah ...................... S-24 S.2.2.8 Option of Expanding Conversion Facility Operations.............. S-26 S.2.3 Alternatives Considered but Not Analyzed in Detail ............................... S-27 S.2.3.1 Use of Commercial Conversion Capacity................................. S-27 S.2.3.2 Sites Other Than Portsmouth .................................................... S-27 S.2.3.3 Alternative Conversion Processes............................................. S-27 S.2.3.4 Long-Term Storage and Disposal Alternatives......................... S-27 S.2.3.5 Other Transportation Modes ..................................................... S-28 S.2.3.6 One Conversion Plant for Two Sites......................................... S-28 v Contents Portsmouth DUF6 Conversion Final EIS CONTENTS (Cont.) S.3 Affected Environment .......................................................................................... S-28 S.4 Environmental Impact Assessment Approach, Assumptions, and Methodology.................................................................................................. S-29 S.5 Consequences and Comparison of Alternatives ................................................... S-32 S.5.1 Human Health and Safety Construction and Normal Facility Operations..................................................................... S-32 S.5.2 Human Health and Safety Facility Accidents .................................... S-33 S.5.2.1 Physical Hazards....................................................................... S-33 S.5.2.2 Facility Accidents Involving Radiation or Chemical Releases................................................................ S-33 S.5.3 Human Health and Safety Transportation.......................................... S-37 S.5.4 Air Quality and Noise ............................................................................. S-41 S.5.5 Water and Soil......................................................................................... S-42 S.5.6 Socioeconomics....................................................................................... S-42 S.5.7 Ecology.................................................................................................... S-43 S.5.8 Waste Management................................................................................. S-43 S.5.9 Resource Requirements........................................................................... S-44 S.5.10 Land Use ................................................................................................. S-45 S.5.11 Cultural Resources .................................................................................. S-45 S.5.12 Environmental Justice ............................................................................. S-45 S.5.13 Impacts from Cylinder Preparation at ETTP........................................... S-45 S.5.14 Impacts Associated with Conversion Product Sale and Use................... S-46 S.5.15 Impacts from D&D Activities................................................................. S-47 S.5.16 Cumulative Impacts................................................................................. S-47 S.5.17 Mitigation................................................................................................ S-49 S.5.18 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts ................................................................ S-51 S.5.19 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources....................... S-51