water

Article Analysis and GIS Mapping of Flooding Hazards on 10 May 2016, , China

Hai-Min Lyu 1, Guo-Fu Wang 2,3, Jack Shuilong Shen 1,*, Lin-Hai Lu 2 and Guo-Quan Wang 4

1 State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering and Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep-Sea Exploration (CISSE), Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China; [email protected] 2 Jinan Rail Transit Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250101, Shandong, China; [email protected] (G.-F.W.); [email protected] (L.-H.L.) 3 College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, Shandong, China 4 Department of Earth and Atmospheric Science, The National Center for Airborne Laser Mapping (NCALM), University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5007, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-21-3420-4301

Academic Editor: Athanasios Loukas Received: 9 August 2016; Accepted: 8 October 2016; Published: 12 October 2016

Abstract: On 10 May 2016, Province, China, suffered a heavy rainstorm. This rainstorm flooded the whole city of Guangzhou. More than 100,000 people were affected by the flooding, in which eight people lost their lives. Subway stations, cars, and buses were submerged. In order to analyse the influential factors of this flooding, topographical characteristics were mapped using Digital Elevation Model (DEM) by the Geographical Information System (GIS) and meteorological conditions were statistically summarised at both the whole city level and the district level. To analyse the relationship between flood risk and urbanization, GIS was also adopted to map the effect of the subway system using the Multiple Buffer operator over the flooding distribution area. Based on the analyses, one of the significant influential factors of flooding was identified as the urbanization degree, e.g., construction of a subway system, which forms along flood-prone areas. The total economic loss due to flooding in city centers with high urbanization has become very serious. Based on the analyses, the traditional standard of severity of flooding hazards (rainfall intensity grade) was modified. Rainfall intensity for severity flooding was decreased from 50 mm to 30 mm in urbanized city centers. In order to protect cities from flooding, a “Sponge City” planning approach is recommended to increase the temporary water storage capacity during heavy rainstorms. In addition, for future city management, the combined use of GIS and Building Information Modelling (BIM) is recommended to evaluate flooding hazards.

Keywords: Guangzhou; heavy rainstorm; flooding hazards; DEM; GIS mapping; statistical analysis

1. Introduction Global warming is a phenomenon that is generally accepted to be mainly due to anthropic activity or a combination of anthropic and natural factors. Global warming can result in extreme precipitation in some parts of the world. The impact of flooding is often considered a consequence of global warming [1–3]. The risk of flooding due to intensive precipitation events will increase as the earth’s temperature increases [4–6]. Flooding caused by heavy rainstorms is considered to be the most common natural disaster occurring worldwide during the last few decades. Flooding has led to serious disasters in recent years, with huge associated economic losses. Flooding will also induce other natural hazards (e.g., landslides, sink holes), which may pose further danger to people and the environment.

Water 2016, 8, 447; doi:10.3390/w8100447 www.mdpi.com/journal/water Water 2016, 8, 447 2 of 17 Water 2016, 8, 447 2 of 17 to personalFlooding property is a globally and occurring the environment, natural hazard thatand resultsflooding in widespread has caused damage many to personalenvironmental property and socioeconomicand the environment, consequences and flooding within hasthe causedflood‐prone many environmental areas [7,8]. and socioeconomic consequences withinGuangzhou the flood-prone is located areas in the [7,8 ]., on the northern boundary of the South China Sea. GuangzhouGuangzhou is a istypical located coastal in the Pearlcity with River frequent Delta, on heavy the northern rainstorms. boundary The climate of the South characteristics, China Sea. Guangzhou is a typical coastal city with frequent heavy rainstorms. The climate characteristics, weather systems, and geographical position are major factors in the formation of heavy rainstorms. weather systems, and geographical position are major factors in the formation of heavy rainstorms. FigureFigure 1 shows1 shows the the location location of of the the study study area area in GuangdongGuangdong Province. Province. Climate Climate change change does does affect affect the the amountamount of rainfall of rainfall in inGuangzhou, Guangzhou, and and results results in aa higherhigher level level of of precipitation precipitation [9]. [9]. Fluctuations Fluctuations in in temperaturetemperature and and air air pressure pressure cancan result result in in heavy heavy rainfall rainfall with floodingwith flooding in the summer in the months summer [10 ,months11]. [10,11].The The frequent frequent flooding flooding events inevents Guangzhou in Guangzhou have caused have huge caused economic huge losses economic and also losses endangered and also endangeredthe lives ofthe citizens. lives of Therefore, citizens. analysis Therefore, of the analysis contributing of the factors contributing and investigation factors and of the investigation spatial and of the spatialtemporal and characteristics temporal characteristics of heavy rainfall of inheavy Guangzhou rainfall are in required.Guangzhou are required.

N N (b) 0 40km

China Conghua

Huadu Zengcheng Baiyun u

p e g

h n

n a

a u N Yuexiu i 0 100km (a) T H Liwan Haizhu Fanyu

N a n Guangzhou s Guangzhou h a

Guangdong Province Karst caves

FigureFigure 1. Location 1. Location map map of ofGuangzhou Guangzhou and and distribution distribution ofof karstkarst caves caves in in Guangdong Guangdong Province Province (a) distribution(a) distribution of karst of karst caves caves in in Guangdong Guangdong Province; Province; ( b(b)) districts districts of of Guangzhou Guangzhou City. City.

GuangzhouGuangzhou is isalso also characterised characterised byby its its karst karst topography. topography. Figure Figure1 shows 1 theshows distribution the distribution of karst of karstcaves caves in in Guangdong Guangdong province. province. Guangzhou Guangzhou is located is located in the karst in the area karst of southern area of China. southern The karstChina. or The karstkarst or karst caverns, caverns, which arewhich buried are underground buried underground at depths of upat todepths 50 m, formof up a complex to 50 m, network form system.a complex networkWhen system. there is high-intensityWhen there rainfall,is high karst‐intensity cavern rainfall, network karst may storecavern large network amounts may of rainwater, store large amountswhich of cause rainwater, underground which hazards cause suchunderground as sinkholes hazards [12,13]. Therefore,such as sinkholes the karst areas [12,13]. of South Therefore, China the karstface areas serious of South challenges China with face the serious increased challenges risk of flooding with caused the increased by heavy rainfall.risk of flooding caused by heavy rainfall.With the rapid economic development of the coastal regions of China, a large population has migrated to coastal cities in the last 20 years. Statistical analysis showed that the coastal population With the rapid economic development of the coastal regions of China, a large population has in 1985 was 8.6%, and increased to 19.7% in 2010 [14]. The expansion of the population in coastal migrated to coastal cities in the last 20 years. Statistical analysis showed that the coastal population cities results in rapid urbanisation [15,16]. Increasing traffic congestion has led to a demand for in 1985the was development 8.6%, and of increased urban railway to 19.7% transportation in 2010 [14]. systems The in expansion big cities suchof the as population Beijing, Shanghai, in coastal cities results in rapid urbanisation [15,16]. Increasing traffic congestion has led to a demand for the development of urban railway transportation systems in big cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Chongqing, where there has been construction of underground tunnels, and deep excavation in urban areas [17–19]. Urbanisation also causes other environmental and geological problems, such as groundwater pollution, land subsidence, sink holes in urban areas, and an increased risk of flooding [20–24]. To solve these problems, ground improvement technology has been developed and new environment‐friendly geomaterials have been invented [25–27]. In Water 2016, 8, 447 3 of 17

Guangzhou, and Chongqing, where there has been construction of underground tunnels, and deep excavation in urban areas [17–19]. Urbanisation also causes other environmental and geological problems, such as groundwater pollution, land subsidence, sink holes in urban areas, and an increased risk of flooding [20–24]. To solve these problems, ground improvement technology has been developed and new environment-friendly geomaterials have been invented [25–27]. In Guangzhou, a number of subway lines have been constructed recently. The presence of these underground subway lines leads to the surrounding environment becoming vulnerable to the consequences of heavy rainstorms and prone to flooding. In recent years, Guangzhou City has suffered from frequent flooding. According to the statistics of historic rainfall characteristics, the rainfall and rainy days increased annually. Since the start of the flood season (May to July), Guangzhou City has experienced continuous heavy rain. On 10 May 2016, flooding caused by heavy rainfall hit Guangzhou City. The whole city was flooded within 16 h from 4:00 P.M. on 9 May to 8:30 A.M. on 10 May. This flooding strongly affected local people’s lives and killed eight people. Topography has a significant role on the forming and distribution of flooding [28–30]. Elevation and slope are generally used to quantify topographic variation. Elevation is an important factor in flooding after rainstorms. A ground surface with a lower elevation has a high possibility of flooding. Surfaces with a steep slope have a low possibility of being inundated because floodwater can easily drain towards the downslope. Elevation and slope were generated from a digital elevation model (DEM) using GIS [31]. It is significant to analyse flood risk based on topography and historical rainfall record. GIS is a useful tool to assess flood-prone areas. Topography characteristics can be extracted using the DEM and the influence of the metro system can be analysed using the Multiple Buffer Operator in the ArcMap environment [31]. Linear regression is also an effective method to analyse historical rainfall. Based on statistical analysis, this paper analysed the historical rainfall record and the rainfall that occurred on 10 May 2016 in Guangzhou City. The objectives of this paper are to (i) report on the flooding that happened on 10 May 2016; (ii) analyse the factors associated with flooding based on topography and historical rainfall data; (iii) plot the flood-prone areas by considering the spatial distribution of subway system using GIS mapping; and (iv) discuss future flooding prevention measures.

2. Methodology

2.1. GIS Mapping This paper using three-dimensional Analyst Tools in ArcGIS version 10.2 analysed the topography characteristics of the spatial distribution of elevation and slope in Guanzhou. The characteristics of the river system were also depicted by GIS. These data were obtained from Geospacial Data Cloud. In order to analyse the relationship between flood risk and urbanization, GIS mapping has been used to consider the effect of the subway system on the flooding distribution areas and to delineate the influence areas of subway lines. In order to evaluate the effects of subway lines during rainfall conditions, the flood-prone areas have been analysed. The influence of subway system and the flood-prone areas were analysed using the Multiple Buffer Operator in ArcMap. The value of buffer distance was based on the scale of the tunnel model. The scale of the distance to stratum during construction of tunneling can be determined by the following equation (Peck 1969) [32]:

x2 − 2 Sx = Smaxe 2i , (1) where Sx is a settlement with a distance from tunnel axis x; Smax is the maximum settlement at the ground surface over the tunnel; and i is defined as i = 0.5 d, in which d is a distance from the surface of tunnel axis. The settlement induced by tunnel construction generally ranges from 40 m to 60 m. Water 2016, 8, 447 4 of 17

Shen et al.’s fieldwork results also showed that there exists a ground surface settlement trough similar to Equation (1) along subway lines, induced by long-term train running [33]. Therefore, the buffer distance was designated as 50 m when assessing the scale of flood-prone areas.

2.2. Statistical Analysis In order to analyse the characteristics of the rainfall in Guangzhou City, this paper used the method of linear regression to analyse the rainfall characteristics both at the whole city level and the district level. Based on the precipitation and possibility of flooding, this paper analysed the heavy rainfall that occurred on 10 May 2016. The value of rainfall was obtained from the China Meteorological Data Network in seven hydrological station of Guangzhou. The Thiessen polygon method was used to assess the rainfall distribution via considering topography characteristics. The theory of the method is based on the following equation: 1 i=n Q = Q A , (2) A ∑i=1 i i where Q is the average rainfall in an area; A represents the scale of the area; Qi is the rainfall in the area of Tyson triangle; and Ai represents the scale of the Tyson triangle [31]. There are many classification systems for defining the hazard level of flooding disasters, taking into account the probability, duration, and area of flooding. In Guangdong Province, the rainfall intensity grade is determined by parameter “R”. R is defined by the amount of precipitation within 24 h. When “R” is more than 50 mm, this is defined as a “heavy rain day”, and when “R” is more than 100 mm, this is defined as a “torrential rain day” [1]. In order to evaluate the severity of flooding hazards, based on the historical records in Guangdong province, a value of Rs was used; Rs represents the precipitation within 24 h. The Rs value was used to determine whether the area will develop flooding or not and the flooding severity grade [7]. The severity of flooding hazards is classified into five levels according to the Bureau of Meteorology of Guangzhou, i.e., (1) catastrophic flooding (Rs is more than 250 mm/24-h); (2) severe flooding (Rs ranges from 250 mm to 100 mm/24-h); (3) common flooding (Rs ranges from 100 mm to 50 mm/24-h); (4) light flooding (Rs ranges from 50 mm to 25 mm/24-h); and (5) no flooding (Rs ranges from 25 mm to 0 mm/24-h). Based on the aforementioned classification, this paper identifies the level of flooding hazards on 10 May 2016 in Guangzhou.

3. Characteristics of Study Area

3.1. Topography Figure2 shows the topography of Guangzhou. The river network is densely distributed in Guangzhou. Pear River runs through the central area and ultimately flows into the South China Sea (Figure2a). The average elevation of Guangzhou is 11 m, and the highest peak is 1100 m and is located at the boundary of and Longmen county. The central area lies in the hilly basin region. As a part of the Pearl River Delta, the Fanyu and Conghua districts are on the coastal alluvial plain. The elevation of the central area is lower than that of the northeast area, and the slope in the northeast area is steeper than in the central area, which means that rainwater always flows from the northeast to the central area. This type of topography causes the central areas to be vulnerable to flooding. The special geographical position and topography determine the distribution of flooding caused by heavy rainstorms. The spatial distribution of elevation and slope of Guanzhou are depicted in Figure2b,c. Water 2016, 8, 447 5 of 17

September,Water 2016, 8, 447which is called the flooding season in Guangzhou. Fifty‐one percent of the annual5 of 17 heavy rain happens during April to June, and 39% happens during July to September.

Figure 2. Topography in Guangzhou: (a) River system; (b) elevation; (c) slope. Figure 2. Topography in Guangzhou: (a) River system; (b) elevation; (c) slope. Figure 4 shows the annual number of heavy rain days, during which rainfall is more than 50 3.2. Meteorology mm, in Guangzhou for each year from 1951 to 2009. A total of 403 heavy rain days during the 59 years3.2.1. period Rainfall was Characteristics observed, equivalent at City Level to an average of seven days per year. The maximum number of heavy rain days during the aforementioned 59‐year period is 16, which occurred in 2001, and the minimumSome occurred researchers in [ 341990.–37 ]By believe conducting that the linear increased regression number analysis of heavy on rainfall the annual events isnumber related of to heavyhigh global rain days, temperatures. it can be Guangzhoufound that the has average a southern number subtropical of heavy monsoon rain days climate. presented The monsoon a linear growthclimate trend can lead annually to both (Figure hot weather 4). Therefore, and typhoons, it is important together to withforecast heavy heavy rainfall rainfall in the in order summer. to takeThe annualpreventative rainfall measures ranges from to mitigate 1600 to 1900flooding mm hazards. [1,7]. Rainfall is the main natural factor that can lead to flooding. Figure3 shows the total number of heavy rain days in Guangzhou within the 59-year period from 1951 to 2009. Guangzhou has had heavy rainfall from January to November but there has not been any heavy rain in December within those 59 years. As shown in Figure3, the number of heavy Water 2016, 8, 447 6 of 17 rain days shows two sharp increases; there is an increase from 10 days in March up to 37 days in April, and then another increase from 37 days in April up to 69 days in May (the peak value). The significant heavy rain days and torrential rain days are concentrated in May and June (Figure3). Statistical results show that 90% of the annual heavy rain occurred from April to September, which is called the flooding season in Guangzhou. Fifty-one percent of the annual heavy rain happens during April to June, and 39% happens during July to September. Figure4 shows the annual number of heavy rain days, during which rainfall is more than 50 mm, in Guangzhou for each year from 1951 to 2009. A total of 403 heavy rain days during the 59 years period was observed, equivalent to an average of seven days per year. The maximum number of heavy rain days during the aforementioned 59-year period is 16, which occurred in 2001, and the minimum occurred in 1990. By conducting linear regression analysis on the annual number of heavy rain days, it can be found that the average number of heavy rain days presented a linear growth trend annually (Figure4). Therefore, it is important to forecast heavy rainfall in order to take preventative measures to mitigateWater flooding 2016, 8, 447 hazards. 6 of 17 Water 2016, 8, 447 6 of 17

70 Heavy rain days 70 Heavy rain days Torrential rain days 60 Torrential rain days 60

50 Data from Cai (2011) 50 Data from Cai (2011) 40 40

30 30

Total days of rainfall of days Total 20

Total days of rainfall of days Total 20

10 10

0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month Month Figure 3. Monthly distributed heavy rain days from 1951 to 2009. FigureFigure 3. Monthly 3. Monthly distributed distributed heavy heavy rain days days from from 1951 1951 to 2009. to 2009.

18 18 Annual heavy rain days Annual heavy rain days 16 Average heavy rain days 16 Average heavy rain days 14 14 12 y=0.0279x+5.956 12 y=0.0279x+5.956 10 10 8 8 6 Days of rainfall Days 6 Days of rainfall Days 4 4 2 2 Data from Cai (2011) 0 Data from Cai (2011) 0 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year Year Figure 4. Annual heavy rain days from 1951 to 2009 in Guangzhou. Figure 4. Annual heavy rain days from 1951 to 2009 in Guangzhou. Figure 4. Annual heavy rain days from 1951 to 2009 in Guangzhou. 3.2.2. Rainfall Characteristics at District Level 3.2.2. Rainfall Characteristics at District Level In order to analyse the characteristics of rainfall at district level, more attention was paid to the In order to analyse the characteristics of rainfall at district level, more attention was paid to the attempts to evaluate the central urban area, which includes Fanyu, Huadu, Zengcheng, and attempts to evaluate the central urban area, which includes Fanyu, Huadu, Zengcheng, and Conghua Districts. Figure 5 shows the number of heavy rain days annually in Guangzhou at the Conghua Districts. Figure 5 shows the number of heavy rain days annually in Guangzhou at the district level. As shown in Figure 5, before 2001, except for 1993, there were fewer heavy rain days district level. As shown in Figure 5, before 2001, except for 1993, there were fewer heavy rain days in the central urban area than in the suburban district of Conghua and Zengcheng (Figure 5). in the central urban area than in the suburban district of Conghua and Zengcheng (Figure 5). Moreover, Figure 5 also indicates that in the Conghua and Zengcheng districts heavier rainfall Moreover, Figure 5 also indicates that in the Conghua and Zengcheng districts heavier rainfall occurred than in other districts. Linear analysis also shows that the average number of heavy rain occurred than in other districts. Linear analysis also shows that the average number of heavy rain days in different districts has also increased annually. days in different districts has also increased annually. Water 2016, 8, 447 7 of 17

3.2.2. Rainfall Characteristics at District Level In order to analyse the characteristics of rainfall at district level, more attention was paid to the attempts to evaluate the central urban area, which includes Fanyu, Huadu, Zengcheng, and Conghua Districts. Figure5 shows the number of heavy rain days annually in Guangzhou at the district level. As shown in Figure5, before 2001, except for 1993, there were fewer heavy rain days in the central urban area than in the suburban district of Conghua and Zengcheng (Figure5). Moreover, Figure5 also indicates that in the Conghua and Zengcheng districts heavier rainfall occurred than in other districts. Linear analysis also shows that the average number of heavy rain days in different districts hasWater also 2016 increased, 8, 447 annually. 7 of 17

Central urban area Fanyu 18 Huadu Zengcheng Conghua 16 Average heavy rain days

14

12

10

8

6 Days of rainfall rainfall of Days 4 y=0.1835x+5.638 2

0 Data from Wang (2006)

1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 Year

Figure 5. Annual heavy rain days from 1985 to 2004 in fivefive centralcentral districtsdistricts ofof Guangzhou.Guangzhou.

InIn orderorder to to compare compare the the precipitation precipitation among among different different districts districts in Guangzhou, in Guangzhou, this paper this counted paper thecounted total rainfallthe total within rainfall 20 within years in 20 five years suburban in five districtssuburban of districts Guangzhou. of Guangzhou. Figure6 shows Figure the 6 annual shows rainfallthe annual in different rainfall suburbanin different districts suburban (central districts urban (central area, Fanyu, urban Huadu, area, Fanyu, Zengcheng, Huadu, and Zengcheng, Conghua). and Conghua). It can be seen that Zengcheng and Conghua have heavier rainfall and more It can be seen that Zengcheng and Conghua have heavier rainfall and more torrential rainfall than torrential rainfall than the other districts (Figure 6). The results show that these two areas are more the other districts (Figure6). The results show that these two areas are more vulnerable to heavy rain vulnerable to heavy rain and therefore a monitoring system should be developed to help protect and therefore a monitoring system should be developed to help protect these districts from flooding. these districts from flooding. Based on the analysis of the rainfall characteristics at the city level and Based on the analysis of the rainfall characteristics at the city level and district level, it can be seen that district level, it can be seen that the rainfall increased annually. the rainfall increased annually.

3.3. Human Activities Rainfall 40 Heavy rainfall Data from Wang (2006) As a result of rapid urbanization, Torrential large rainfall numbers of people have congregated in Guangzhou. A significant number35 of urban subways have been constructed in order to reduce traffic pressure. Figure7 shows a plan view of the subway system of Guangzhou. It can be seen from this figure 30 that the distribution of subway lines in the central area is very dense. This subway facility is the mm) 3 main man-made factor25 contributing to serious flooding hazards. Human activities have also made the surrounding environment vulnerable to the effects of heavy rainstorms and flooding hazards. Consequently, the central20 urban area always suffers more in severe conditions and experiences greater economic loss than the suburban areas, even though the rainfall levels are lower than in suburban areas. 15

10

5 Total rainfall in 20 years (10 years 20 in rainfall Total 0 Central area Fanyu Huadu Zengcheng Conghua Different suburban areas Figure 6. Annual rainfall from 1985 to 2004 in five suburban areas of Guangzhou.

3.3. Human Activities As a result of rapid urbanization, large numbers of people have congregated in Guangzhou. A significant number of urban subways have been constructed in order to reduce traffic pressure. Water 2016, 8, 447 7 of 17

Central urban area Fanyu 18 Huadu Zengcheng Conghua 16 Average heavy rain days

14

12

10

8

6 Days of rainfall rainfall of Days 4 y=0.1835x+5.638 2

0 Data from Wang (2006)

1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 Year

Figure 5. Annual heavy rain days from 1985 to 2004 in five central districts of Guangzhou.

In order to compare the precipitation among different districts in Guangzhou, this paper counted the total rainfall within 20 years in five suburban districts of Guangzhou. Figure 6 shows the annual rainfall in different suburban districts (central urban area, Fanyu, Huadu, Zengcheng, and Conghua). It can be seen that Zengcheng and Conghua have heavier rainfall and more torrential rainfall than the other districts (Figure 6). The results show that these two areas are more vulnerable to heavy rain and therefore a monitoring system should be developed to help protect these districts from flooding. Based on the analysis of the rainfall characteristics at the city level and Water 2016, 8, 447 8 of 17 district level, it can be seen that the rainfall increased annually.

Rainfall 40 Heavy rainfall Data from Wang (2006) Torrential rainfall 35

30 mm) 3 25

20

15 Water 2016, 8, 447 8 of 17 10 Figure 7 shows a plan view of the subway system of Guangzhou. It can be seen from this figure that the distribution of subway5 lines in the central area is very dense. This subway facility is the main

man‐made factor contributing (10 years 20 in rainfall Total to serious flooding hazards. Human activities have also made the 0 surrounding environmentCentral vulnerable area to Fanyu the effects Huadu of heavy Zengcheng rainstorms Conghua and flooding hazards. Consequently, the central urban area alwaysDifferent suffers suburban more areasin severe conditions and experiences greater economic loss than the suburban areas, even though the rainfall levels are lower than in Figure 6. Annual rainfall from 1985 to 2004 in five suburban areas of Guangzhou. suburban areas.Figure 6. Annual rainfall from 1985 to 2004 in five suburban areas of Guangzhou. 3.3. Human Activities N As a result of rapid urbanization, large numbers of peopleCentral have urban congregated area in Guangzhou. A significant number of urban subways have been constructed in order to reduce traffic pressure. 0 20km 40km Sub centre area Guangzhou Line 1 Line 2 Line 4 Line 5 Line 6 Line 8 APM Guang-Fo Line Line 7 (under construction) Line 9 (under construction) Line 11 (under construction) Line 13 (under construction) Line 14 (under construction) Line 21 (under construction)

Figure 7. Plan view of Guangzhou city and distribution of subways. Figure 7. Plan view of Guangzhou city and distribution of subways. 4. Flooding Hazards on 10 May 2016 4. Flooding Hazards on 10 May 2016 On 10 May 2016, Guangzhou experienced a heavy rainstorm. The average rainfall was 67.6 mm On 10 May 2016, Guangzhou experienced a heavy rainstorm. The average rainfall was 67.6 mm over a period of 16 h and the heaviest rainfall was 186.6 mm in Fanyu district (suburban area). The over a period of 16 h and the heaviest rainfall was 186.6 mm in Fanyu district (suburban area). total rainfall from 4:00 P.M. on 9 May to 08:30 A.M. on 10 May was 23.2 mm in Conghua, 19.2 mm The total rainfall from 4:00 P.M. on 9 May to 08:30 A.M. on 10 May was 23.2 mm in Conghua, 19.2 mm in Zengcheng, 45.0 mm in Huadu, 63.1 mm in Baiyun, 62.2 mm in Tianhe, 36.8 mm in Yuexiu, 47.1 in Zengcheng, 45.0 mm in Huadu, 63.1 mm in Baiyun, 62.2 mm in Tianhe, 36.8 mm in Yuexiu, mm in Liwan, 41.2 mm in Haizhu, 78.1 mm in Fanyu, 70.6 mm in Nansha, and 46.3 mm in 47.1 mm in Liwan, 41.2 mm in Haizhu, 78.1 mm in Fanyu, 70.6 mm in Nansha, and 46.3 mm in Huangpu. The rainfall data were collected on the Guangzhou Meteorological Data Sharing Huangpu. The rainfall data were collected on the Guangzhou Meteorological Data Sharing Network Network (GMDSN) [38]. This heavy rainstorm flooded the whole city and destroyed many flood (GMDSN) [38]. This heavy rainstorm flooded the whole city and destroyed many flood walls from walls from the land side. The depth of floodwater at some road section was over 500 mm. Some the land side. The depth of floodwater at some road section was over 500 mm. Some road sections road sections were flooded, with partially submerged cars (Figure 8a–c), and in places the roads were flooded, with partially submerged cars (Figure8a–c), and in places the roads looks like pools looks like pools (Figure 8d). The Changpan subway station on Metro Line 6 in Guangzhou was also (Figure8d). The Changpan subway station on Metro Line 6 in Guangzhou was also flooded in the flooded in the rainstorm (Figure 9). A large volume of rainwater flowed into Changpan station and inundated a part of the station, causing the subway to become an underground river. According to records, flood walls failed in six places during the flooding disaster in Guangzhou, which caused a back flow of river water into the city. More than 100,000 people were affected by the floods, and eight people were killed. It is estimated that the direct economic loss caused by this incident was more than CNY ¥543.8 million. In order to mitigate risks in the future, it is essential to investigate the spatial and temporal characteristics of the risk factors. Therefore, factor analysis is conducted in the following paragraphs based on an analysis of the topographical features of Guangzhou City and the meteorological conditions, which are statistically summarised both at the whole city level and at the district level. More attention will be paid to the exacerbation of flooding hazards due to the existence of the subway system. Water 2016, 8, 447 9 of 17 rainstorm (Figure9). A large volume of rainwater flowed into Changpan station and inundated a part of the station, causing the subway to become an underground river. According to records, flood walls failed in six places during the flooding disaster in Guangzhou, which caused a back flow of river water into the city. More than 100,000 people were affected by the floods, and eight people were killed. It is estimated that the direct economic loss caused by this incident was more than CNY ¥543.8 million. In order to mitigate risks in the future, it is essential to investigate the spatial and temporal characteristics of the risk factors. Therefore, factor analysis is conducted in the following paragraphs based on an analysis of the topographical features of Guangzhou City and the meteorological conditions, which are statistically summarised both at the whole city level and at the district level. More attention will be paid to the exacerbation of flooding hazards due to the Water 2016, 8, 447 9 of 17 existenceWater 2016 of, 8 the, 447 subway system. 9 of 17

FigureFigure 8. Roads8. Roads flooded flooded during during the heavythe heavy rainstorm rainstorm in 10 Mayin 10 2016: May ( a2016:) flooded (a) road;flooded (b )road; submerged (b) Figure 8. Roads flooded during the heavy rainstorm in 10 May 2016: (a) flooded road; (b) cars;submerged (c) depth cars; of floodwater (c) depth of over floodwater adult’s knee;over adult’s (d) road knee; like (d pool.) road like pool. submerged cars; (c) depth of floodwater over adult’s knee; (d) road like pool.

Figure 9. Subway station flooded during the heavy rainfall on 10 May 2016. Figure 9. Subway station flooded during the heavy rainfall on 10 May 2016. 5. Results andFigure Discussion 9. Subway station flooded during the heavy rainfall on 10 May 2016.

5. Results5.1. Hazard and Analysis Discussion on 10 May 2016

5.1. HazardFigure Analysis 10 plots on the 10 rainfallMay 2016 in different suburban areas during the flooding on 10 May 2016. The total rainfall in Conghua was 23.2 mm and that in Zengcheng was 19.2 mm in 16 h; Tianhe, Baiyu, Fanyu,Figure Nansha 10 plots all thehad rainfall more than in different 50 mm. This suburban rainfall areas intensity during can thebe defined flooding as on heavy 10 May rainfall 2016. and The totalcan rainfall quickly in cause Conghua flooding. was The 23.2 rainfall mm and in the that central in Zengcheng suburban wasareas 19.2 of Yuxiu, mm in Haizhu, 16 h; Tianhe, Liwan, Baiyu,and Fanyu,Huangpu Nansha was all less had than more 50 mm, than which 50 mm. is notThis enough rainfall to intensity reach the can value be definedof heavy as rainfall, heavy but rainfall due toand canthe quickly intensive cause distribution flooding. ofThe subway rainfall lines in the and central heavy suburban rainfall in areas this district,of Yuxiu, these Haizhu, areas Liwan, suffered and Huangpuserious floodingwas less and than large 50 mm, economic which losses. is not enough to reach the value of heavy rainfall, but due to the intensiveAs shown distribution in Figure 10,of thesubway 10 May lines flooding and heavy fell into rainfall three categories in this district, according these to theareas total suffered loss: seriouscommon, flooding severe, and and large catastrophic economic flooding.losses. This classification of hazard severity is based on the aforementionedAs shown in Figurestandard 10, ofthe severity 10 May of flooding flooding fell hazards into three (Rs ),categories but is slightly according different to the from total the loss: common,traditional severe, Rs, as and will catastrophicbe explained flooding.in detail inThis Section classification 5.2.2. Although of hazard the rainfall severity levels is based in Yuexiu, on the aforementioned standard of severity of flooding hazards (Rs), but is slightly different from the traditional Rs, as will be explained in detail in Section 5.2.2. Although the rainfall levels in Yuexiu, Water 2016, 8, 447 10 of 17

5. Results and Discussion

5.1. Hazard Analysis on 10 May 2016 Figure 10 plots the rainfall in different suburban areas during the flooding on 10 May 2016. The total rainfall in Conghua was 23.2 mm and that in Zengcheng was 19.2 mm in 16 h; Tianhe, Baiyu, Fanyu, Nansha all had more than 50 mm. This rainfall intensity can be defined as heavy rainfall and can quickly cause flooding. The rainfall in the central suburban areas of Yuxiu, Haizhu, Liwan, and Huangpu was less than 50 mm, which is not enough to reach the value of heavy rainfall, but due to the intensive distribution of subway lines and heavy rainfall in this district, these areas suffered serious flooding and large economic losses. As shown in Figure 10, the 10 May flooding fell into three categories according to the total loss: common, severe, and catastrophic flooding. This classification of hazard severity is based on the aforementioned standard of severity of flooding hazards (Rs), but is slightly different from the Water 2016, 8, 447 10 of 17 traditional Rs, as will be explained in detail in Section 5.2.2. Although the rainfall levels in Yuexiu, Haizhu,Haizhu, andand LiwanLiwan werewere lessless thanthan 5050 mm,mm, thethe floodingflooding thatthat occurredoccurred waswas veryvery serious,serious, andand cancan bebe defineddefined as as catastrophic catastrophic flooding. flooding. The The rainfall rainfall levels levels in in Huangpu Huangpu and and Huadu Huadu were were the the same same as thoseas those in Yuexiu,in Yuexiu, Haizhu, Haizhu, and and Liwan, Liwan, but but the situationthe situation in Yuexiu, in Yuexiu, Haizhu, Haizhu, and Liwanand Liwan was morewas more serious serious than inthan Huangpu in Huangpu and Huadu. and Huadu. Therefore, Therefore, the flooding the flooding of Huangpu of Huangpu and Huadu and Huadu was classified was classified as severe as flooding.severe flooding. Flooding Flooding is defined is as defined severe whenas severe the “ Rwhens” value the is“R mores” value than is 50 more mm, sothan the 50 flooding mm, so in thethe suburbanflooding in areas the ofsuburban Tianhe, Baiyun,areas of Fanyu, Tianhe, and Baiyun, Nansha Fanyu, was classified and Nansha as severe was classified in this flooding as severe event. in Thethis rainfallflooding levels event. in ConghuaThe rainfall and levels Zengcheng in Conghua were 23.2and mm Zengcheng and 19.2 were mm, respectively,23.2 mm and so 19.2 that mm, the floodingrespectively, in these so that areas the was flooding classified in these as common areas was flooding. classified as common flooding.

90 Rainfall Flooding disaster caused by heavy rainfall (R >50mm) 80 s Catastrophic flooding Severe flooding 70

60 Flooding disaster caused by internal < and external factors (Rs 50mm) 50 Rs≥30 occurred flooding disaster 40 Common flooding

30 < Rs 50mm Rainfall within 16 hours (mm) 20

10

0 Yuexiu Haizhu Liwan Huangpu Huadu Tianhe Baiyun Fanyu Nansha ConghuaZengcheng Different suburban areas Figure 10. Rainfall in different suburban areas in flooding disaster on 10 May 2016. Figure 10. Rainfall in different suburban areas in flooding disaster on 10 May 2016.

5.2. Factors Inducing Flooding 5.2. Factors Inducing Flooding The main factors that led to the flooding on 10 May 2016 include natural conditions The main factors that led to the flooding on 10 May 2016 include natural conditions (subtropical climate, unique geographical position and topography, level of rainfall) and man‐made (subtropical climate, unique geographical position and topography, level of rainfall) and man-made conditions (especially the construction of subway lines). Based on the recorded rainfall data at both the whole city and district levels, the factors that were determined to contribute to the flood are as follows: (1) Guangzhou has a typical subtropical monsoon climate, which is the main factor leading to flooding. In this type of climate, during the summer months the wind direction is from the ocean to the land, bringing moisture‐laden air. This leads to heavy rain and can result in flooding in the summer months; (2) Human activities, particularly the construction of subway lines, made the flooding hazards more serious, which resulted in severe economic losses; (3) Underground pipelines and road drainage capacities are also important factors that affected the flooding. Proposals for reducing the risk of flooding can be developed after analysing the contribution of each factor. A detailed analysis of those factors is discussed in the following paragraphs.

5.2.1. Rainfall Rainfall is the natural factor that caused the flooding. As indicated in Figure 10, the rainfall levels in Tianhe, Baiyun, Fanyu, and Nansha all exceeded 50 mm within 16 h. This kind of heavy rainfall within a short duration can easily lead to flooding. In this rainstorm, the suburban areas of Fanyu and Nansha experienced severe flooding. The rainfall reached 78.1 mm in Fanyu and 70.6 Water 2016, 8, 447 11 of 17 conditions (especially the construction of subway lines). Based on the recorded rainfall data at both the whole city and district levels, the factors that were determined to contribute to the flood are as follows: (1) Guangzhou has a typical subtropical monsoon climate, which is the main factor leading to flooding. In this type of climate, during the summer months the wind direction is from the ocean to the land, bringing moisture-laden air. This leads to heavy rain and can result in flooding in the summer months; (2) Human activities, particularly the construction of subway lines, made the flooding hazards more serious, which resulted in severe economic losses; (3) Underground pipelines and road drainage capacities are also important factors that affected the flooding. Proposals for reducing the risk of flooding can be developed after analysing the contribution of each factor. A detailed analysis of those factors is discussed in the following paragraphs.

5.2.1. Rainfall Rainfall is the natural factor that caused the flooding. As indicated in Figure 10, the rainfall levels in Tianhe, Baiyun, Fanyu, and Nansha all exceeded 50 mm within 16 h. This kind of heavy rainfall withinWater 2016 a short, 8, 447 duration can easily lead to flooding. In this rainstorm, the suburban areas of Fanyu11 andof 17 Nansha experienced severe flooding. The rainfall reached 78.1 mm in Fanyu and 70.6 mm in Nansha. mm in Nansha. This phenomenon highlights the need for an improved meteorological monitoring This phenomenon highlights the need for an improved meteorological monitoring system for these system for these areas, and the necessity for measures to mitigate flooding disasters. areas, and the necessity for measures to mitigate flooding disasters. Figure 2a depicts the distribution of hydrological stations in Guangzhou city. The hydrological Figure2a depicts the distribution of hydrological stations in Guangzhou city. The hydrological stations can monitor and record precipitation. Considering rivers and characteristics of topography stations can monitor and record precipitation. Considering rivers and characteristics of topography including the elevation and slope of the study area, the rainfall distribution of the 10 May rainstorm including the elevation and slope of the study area, the rainfall distribution of the 10 May rainstorm was was plotted by GIS (Figure 11). The precipitation on 10 May 2016 was obtained from China plottedMeteorological by GIS (Figure Data Network. 11). The precipitation As shown in on Figure 10 May 11, 2016 rainfall was in obtained the southwest from China region Meteorological was higher Datathan Network.in the northeast. As shown Fanyu in Figure district 11 ,had rainfall the inhighest the southwest rainfall and region Zengcheng was higher district than inhad the the northeast. lowest Fanyu(Figure district 11). The had central the highest area rainfallhad the and second Zengcheng highest district rainfall. had Therefore, the lowest the (Figure central 11 ).area The had central the areamost had serious the second flooding. highest rainfall. Therefore, the central area had the most serious flooding.

Figure 11. Rainfall distribution of the 10 May rainstorm, considering the local topography.

5.2.2. Subway System and Modification of Rs The subway lines are intensively distributed underground, particularly in the central areas (Figure 7). Existing underground structures, as well as the ongoing construction of the subway lines, have affected the underground sewage pipe network, and consequently have an effect on the drainage capacity of the sewage system when there is heavy rainfall. It can be seen from Figure 10 that, although the rainfall was less than 50 mm in some areas, the flooding was still serious and caused a huge economic loss. It is recommended that the value of the “Rs” factor for rainfall in this area should be lowered from 50 mm to 30 mm for areas with frequent human activity. In other words, precautions should be taken to prevent flooding if “Rs” is more than 30 mm in 24 h in areas with subway lines. Figure 12 indicates the influence areas and demonstrates their association with the position of underground subway lines. As shown in Figure 12, subway lines have a significant influence on the surrounding environment, which caused the areas with subway lines to become more vulnerable to flooding than areas far away from the subway lines. In order to evaluate the effects of subway lines during rainfall conditions, the flood‐prone areas have been analysed. Figure 13 shows the flood‐prone areas for Line 6 during the heavy rainstorm in Guangzhou on 10 May. It can be seen from the figure that the total flood‐prone area under rainfall conditions is much larger than without rainfall (Figure 12). We also see from Figure 13 that the areas around subway lines become more Water 2016, 8, 447 12 of 17

5.2.2. Subway System and Modification of Rs The subway lines are intensively distributed underground, particularly in the central areas (Figure7). Existing underground structures, as well as the ongoing construction of the subway lines, have affected the underground sewage pipe network, and consequently have an effect on the drainage capacity of the sewage system when there is heavy rainfall. It can be seen from Figure 10 that, although the rainfall was less than 50 mm in some areas, the flooding was still serious and caused a huge economic loss. It is recommended that the value of the “Rs” factor for rainfall in this area should be lowered from 50 mm to 30 mm for areas with frequent human activity. In other words, precautions should be taken to prevent flooding if “Rs” is more than 30 mm in 24 h in areas with subway lines. Figure 12 indicates the influence areas and demonstrates their association with the position of underground subway lines. As shown in Figure 12, subway lines have a significant influence on the surrounding environment, which caused the areas with subway lines to become more vulnerable to flooding than areas far away from the subway lines. In order to evaluate the effects of subway lines during rainfall conditions, the flood-prone areas have been analysed. Figure 13 shows the flood-prone areas for Line 6 during the heavy rainstorm in Guangzhou on 10 May. It can be seen from the figure thatWater the 2016 total, 8, flood-prone 447 area under rainfall conditions is much larger than without rainfall (Figure12 of 17 12 ). We also see from Figure 13 that the areas around subway lines become more vulnerable to flooding thanvulnerable areas further to flooding away from than theareas subway further lines. away It from can alsothe subway be seen lines. that Line It can 6 also is entirely be seen located that Line within 6 theis flood-prone entirely located area within (Figure the 13 flood). ‐prone area (Figure 13). InIn this this flooding flooding disaster, disaster, Changpan Changpan station station ofof LineLine 6 was flooded flooded in in the the rainstorm. rainstorm. Figure Figure 14 14 shows the elevation of Line 6. As shown in Figure 14, Changpan is the final station of Line 6 and is shows the elevation of Line 6. As shown in Figure 14, Changpan is the final station of Line 6 and is located at a lower elevation. The area around the Changpan station is higher. This kind of located at a lower elevation. The area around the Changpan station is higher. This kind of topography topography makes the station prone to flooding because the Line 6 is located in a lower position makes the station prone to flooding because the Line 6 is located in a lower position and the prevention and the prevention gate is insufficient to prevent excess rainwater. This phenomenon is a reminder gatethat is flood insufficient‐prone areas to prevent suffer excessmore serious rainwater. consequences This phenomenon and cause greater is a reminder economic that losses flood-prone in the areasevent suffer of flooding. more serious Therefore, consequences the strengthening and cause of flooding greater protection economic measures losses in in the flood event‐prone of flooding. areas Therefore,is essential. the strengthening of flooding protection measures in flood-prone areas is essential.

Figure 12. Influence areas of subway lines without rainfall. Figure 12. Influence areas of subway lines without rainfall.

Figure 13. Flood‐prone areas and disaster situation of Line 6 during this rainstorm. Water 2016, 8, 447 12 of 17

vulnerable to flooding than areas further away from the subway lines. It can also be seen that Line 6 is entirely located within the flood‐prone area (Figure 13). In this flooding disaster, Changpan station of Line 6 was flooded in the rainstorm. Figure 14 shows the elevation of Line 6. As shown in Figure 14, Changpan is the final station of Line 6 and is located at a lower elevation. The area around the Changpan station is higher. This kind of topography makes the station prone to flooding because the Line 6 is located in a lower position and the prevention gate is insufficient to prevent excess rainwater. This phenomenon is a reminder that flood‐prone areas suffer more serious consequences and cause greater economic losses in the event of flooding. Therefore, the strengthening of flooding protection measures in flood‐prone areas is essential.

Water 2016, 8, 447 13 of 17 Figure 12. Influence areas of subway lines without rainfall.

FigureFigure 13.13. Flood-proneFlood‐prone areas areas and and disaster disaster situation situation of of Line Line 6 during 6 during this this rainstorm. rainstorm. Water 2016, 8, 447 13 of 17

Figure 14. Elevation of Line 6 location. Figure 14. Elevation of Line 6 location. 5.2.3. Underground Pipelines 5.2.3. Underground Pipelines Many infrastructure facilities, such as gas pipelines, cables, and water supply and sewerage Manypipelines, infrastructure have been constructed facilities, such in Guangzhou as gas pipelines, during cables,the past and few water decades. supply Underground and sewerage pipelines,pipelines have are been the constructed main component in Guangzhou of the urban during drainage the past system, few decades.which is Undergroundvery important pipelines for flooding protection. The existing underground pipelines have been disturbed and damaged during are the main component of the urban drainage system, which is very important for flooding protection. the construction of other underground infrastructure. It is a common measure to move existing The existingunderground underground pipelines pipelineswhen they have are beenencountered disturbed during and damagedthe construction during of the underground construction of otherprojects. underground As indicated infrastructure. in Figure It7, isa alarge common number measure of subway to move lines have existing been underground constructed or pipelines are whenunder they areconstruction. encountered These during subway the construction activities of underground can have projects. further influence As indicated on existing in Figure 7, a largeunderground number of pipelines, subway lineswhich have then been reduce constructed their drainage or are capacity. under construction. Therefore, underground These subway constructionpipelines activitiesdo not have can enough have furthercapacity influenceto store the on discharged existing undergroundrainwater, which pipelines, contributes which to an then increased risk of flooding. reduce their drainage capacity. Therefore, underground pipelines do not have enough capacity to store the discharged5.2.4. Road rainwater,Drainage Capacity which contributes to an increased risk of flooding. The factors that affect road drainage capacity are the sewer network system and the materials used in the construction of the road. Road gullies have been widely used in the last few decades. The road gullies design code is based on previous standards, but in practice rainfall is increasing annually, as described previously. Road gullies can easily become blocked by leaves or debris, and some sewers have been severely damaged by the heavy rainstorms. In this flooding event, the depth of floodwater on some road surfaces reached 500 mm. This phenomenon was mainly due to damaged road gullies. Therefore, improvement of the current sewer network and gullies and construction of more sewers are essential. In addition, when a road is undergoing construction, choosing a road surface material with good performance is also important. For example, porous pavements could be adopted.

6. Recommendations A “Sponge City” approach and the application of BIM technology are recommended in order to mitigate the damage caused by flooding due to heavy rainstorms in Guangzhou. To evaluate the flood‐prone areas, GIS mapping, which can give a detailed analysis of flooding distribution, should be adopted. Water 2016, 8, 447 14 of 17

5.2.4. Road Drainage Capacity The factors that affect road drainage capacity are the sewer network system and the materials used in the construction of the road. Road gullies have been widely used in the last few decades. The road gullies design code is based on previous standards, but in practice rainfall is increasing annually, as described previously. Road gullies can easily become blocked by leaves or debris, and some sewers have been severely damaged by the heavy rainstorms. In this flooding event, the depth of floodwater on some road surfaces reached 500 mm. This phenomenon was mainly due to damaged road gullies. Therefore, improvement of the current sewer network and gullies and construction of more sewers are essential. In addition, when a road is undergoing construction, choosing a road surface material with good performance is also important. For example, porous pavements could be adopted.

6. Recommendations A “Sponge City” approach and the application of BIM technology are recommended in order to mitigate the damage caused by flooding due to heavy rainstorms in Guangzhou. To evaluate the flood-prone areas, GIS mapping, which can give a detailed analysis of flooding distribution, should be adopted.

6.1. “Sponge City” Planning Guangzhou is a typical city that could be transformed into a “Sponge City” as it has large amount of rainfall each year. Statistical analysis shows that the rainfall has increased annually. A large volume of rainwater cannot discharge quickly during a heavy rainstorm. In the “Sponge City” planning approach, systems are installed to store the rainwater. This approach to urban planning incorporates improvements to the rainwater storage capacity and drainage systems [24,39,40]. The mechanism of this planning approach includes two phases. The first phase involves storing the run-off temporarily within a multi-functional pipeline system, sluice gates, and pumping stations to provide the storage capacity. The reuse of the rainwater is more environmentally friendly than simply discharging it. Green roofs and forest park areas can temporarily store the rainwater. The other phase of “Sponge City” planning is the drainage of the excess rainwater. This is achieved by draining the excess stored rainwater into rivers. Therefore, the efficient construction of a sewer network system is essential. The previous drainage system can deal with 30 mm rainfall. In the construction of a “Sponge City”, the standard of 50 mm rainfall is recommended. Restricting development in the most flood-prone areas is also required. Improving the efficiency of land use and maintaining a relative balance of land ecosystem and the sustainable use of resources are the basic principles.

6.2. BIM Technology Building Information Modelling (BIM) is a tool for the design, construction, maintenance, and management of projects. It is an efficient model for the construction industry, has been applied to many projects, and is a useful tool for both new and existing construction system. GIS integrates spatial information and spatial analysis, whereas BIM can simulate a more realistic emergency situation by using a Virtual Reality technique [41]. A BIM model can monitor and observe the condition of an underground infrastructure system [42]. During the construction of a “Sponge City”, a large number of multi-functional pipelines will be constructed. The combined use of GIS and BIM can provide a visualisation, which provides information about the geology and the design of multi-functional pipelines. Therefore, the municipal authorities can obtain a level of control over the flooding on a local scale. Recently, with the growth of urbanisation, underground engineering activities have gradually expanded. In order to avoid damaging underground pipelines during construction, an understanding of their distribution is essential. The application of BIM technology can provide useful information for this purpose. Once the layout of the underground pipelines is established, they can be safeguarded Water 2016, 8, 447 15 of 17 during underground engineering construction. Therefore, for future city management, the combined use of GIS and BIM is recommended to evaluate the risk of flooding.

6.3. Evaluation of Flood-Prone Areas Using GIS The occurrence of flooding is not only related to rainfall but also to human activity. Those areas with frequent engineering activities will experience more serious flooding events, which can cause huge economic losses compared to other areas with the same rainfall conditions. In this paper, the underground subway system is considered the main human activity and the analysis focuses on the effects of existing subway lines under heavy rainfall. By using GIS it is possible to identify two of the factors contributing to flooding: the subway line distribution and the rainfall conditions. As shown in Figures 12 and 13, the flood-prone areas become larger during rainstorms. These areas are vulnerable during and after flooding events. In the flood-prone areas disaster situations become more serious. For example, the subway station of Line 6 was flooded because the Line 6 is located in a low position (Figure 14) and the prevention gate was insufficient to prevent excess rainwater during the heavy rainstorm that occurred on 10th May. It is clear that the construction of a large number of urban subway lines has a significant effect on the severity of flooding. Therefore, using GIS to map the flood-prone areas to evaluate the severity of the flooding is effective. In addition, monitoring and protective measures for these flood-prone areas should be strengthened in order to reduce economic losses.

7. Conclusions This paper presents an analysis of the flooding that took place in Guangzhou, China, due to a heavy rainstorm on 10 May 2016. The factors of topography have been analysed using DEM. The meteorology conditions were statistically analysed at the whole city level and the district level. GIS analysis was also performed to map the flood-prone areas. Based on the results of the analysis, the following conclusions can be made:

1. Characteristics of topography include elevation and slopes are critical to the flooding distribution. Metro Line 6 was flooded on 10 May 2016 due to its low elevation in the city center. The observed results show that areas with metro lines were more vulnerable to flooding. Considering the total economic losses in the city center due to flooding, a modification of the standard of severity of flooding hazards was proposed, i.e., lowering the value of the Rs range. 2. There is long-term settlement along metro tunnels due to train running loads, which causes surface subsidence along the subway line. By using multiple buffer analysis in GIS, flood-prone areas along subway lines under rainfall conditions were identified. It can be concluded that the disaster situation was serious and caused greater economic losses in subway areas than in other areas far from the subway lines. Therefore, strengthening of the monitoring and protection system for these flood-prone areas is required. 3. A “Sponge City” planning approach is recommended to improve the capacity of drainage and storage of rainwater temporary during heavy rainstorms. To incorporate the elements of a “Sponge City” requires the construction of a multi-functional pipeline system, sluice gates, and pumping stations in order to store the rainwater and subsequently reuse it. A drainage system should also be constructed to drain the excess rainwater. For the management of the city in the future, the combined use of GIS and BIM is also recommended to evaluate and monitor the risk of flooding.

Acknowledgments: The research work described herein was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant No. 41672259) and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program: 2015CB057802). Financial support was also received from the Shandong Nature Science Foundation (SNSF), Grant No. ZR2014EEM029 and No. ZR2014EEQ028. Water 2016, 8, 447 16 of 17

Author Contributions: Hai-Min Lyu performed the data analysis and drafted the manuscript; Guo-Fu Wang collected the data; Jack Shuilong Shen revised the manuscript; Lin-Hai Lu drew the figures; and Guo-Quan Wang checked the content. All authors made contributions to the study and writing the manuscript. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Wang, X.J.; Pang, A.D. The Cause and Characteristic from Rainstorm of the Past 20 years in Guangzhou. J. Guangzhou Univ. 2006, 5, 50–53. (In Chinese) 2. Huang, Y.; Cheng, H.L. The impact of climate change on coastal geological disasters in south-eastern China. Nat. Hazards 2003, 65, 377–390. [CrossRef] 3. Wu, Y.; Zhong, P.A.; Xu, B.; Zhu, F.; Ma, B. Changing of flood risk due to climate and development in Huaihe River basin, China. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2016, 1–14. [CrossRef] 4. Liu, Y.X.; Li, S.S.; Wang, Y.L.; Zhang, T.; Peng, J.; Li, T. Identification of multiple climatic extremes in metropolis: A comparison of Guangzhou and , China. Nat. Hazards 2015, 79, 939–953. [CrossRef] 5. Cui, P.; Dang, C.; Zhuang, J.Q.; You, Y.; Chen, X.Q.; Scoot, K.M. Landslide-dammed lake at Tangjiashan, Sichuan province, China (triggered by the Wenchuan Earthquake, 12 May 2008): Risk assessment, mitigation strategy, and lessons learned. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 65, 1055–1065. [CrossRef] 6. Almasi, P.; Soltani, S. Assessment of the climate change impacts on flood frequency (case study: Bazoft Basin, Iran). Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2016, 1–12. [CrossRef] 7. Cai, J.Y.; Zhou, X.Y. Heavy rainfall change characteristics in recent 59 years of Guangzhou. Guangdong Meteorol. 2011, 33, 29–31. (In Chinese) 8. Shen, S.L.; Wang, Z.F.; Sun, W.J.; Wang, L.B.; Horpibulsuk, S. A field trial of horizontal jet grouting using the composite-pipe method in the soft deposit of Shanghai. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2013, 35, 142–151. [CrossRef] 9. Shen, S.L.; Wang, Z.F.; Horpibulsuk, S.; Kim, Y.H. Jet-Grouting with a newly developed technology: The Twin-Jet Method. Eng. Geol. 2013, 152, 87–95. [CrossRef] 10. Jing, R.; Zorica, N.-B. Integrating spatial planning and flood risk management: A new conceptual framework for the spatially integrated policy infrastructure. Comput Environ. Urban Syst. 2016, 57, 68–79. 11. Simões, N.E.; Ochoa-Rodríguez, S.; Wang, L.P.; Pina, R.D.; Marques, A.S.; Onof, C.; Leitão, J.P. Stochastic urban pluvial flood hazard maps based upon a spatial-temporal rainfall generator. Water 2015, 7, 3396–3406. [CrossRef] 12. Wu, H.N.; Shen, S.L.; Liao, S.M.; Yin, Z.Y. Longitudinal structural modelling of shield tunnels considering shearing dislocation between segmental rings. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2015, 50, 317–323. [CrossRef] 13. Wu, H.N.; Shen, S.L.; Ma, L.; Yin, Z.Y.; Horpibulsuk, S. Evaluation of the strength increase of marine clay under staged embankment loading: A case study. Mar. Georesour. Geotechnol. 2015, 33, 532–541. [CrossRef] 14. Fu, Y.X.; Chen, Y.Y.; Zhang, Z.K. Temporal and spatial variation of population density of coastal cities during 1985–2010 in China. Trop. Geogr. 2014, 34, 635–642. (In Chinese) 15. Yin, Z.Y.; Hicher, P.Y.; Dano, C.; Jin, Y.F. Modeling the mechanical behavior of very coarse granular materials. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE 2016.[CrossRef] 16. Liu, G.Q.; Wang, X.Q.; Meng, Z.P.; Zhao, H.J. Seawater inrush assessment based on hydrochemical analysis enhanced by hierarchy clustering in an undersea goldmine pit, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014, 71, 4977–4987. [CrossRef] 17. Huang, Y.; Yu, M.; Xu, Q.; Sawada, K.; Moriguchi, S.; Yashima, A.; Liu, C.W.; Xue, L. InSAR-derived digital elevation models for terrain change analysis of earthquake-triggered flow-like landslides based on ALOS/PALSAR imagery. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 73, 7661–7668. [CrossRef] 18. Huang, Y.; Bao, Y.J.; Wang, Y.H. Analysis of geoenvironmental hazards in urban underground space development in Shanghai. Nat. Hazards 2015, 75, 2067–2079. [CrossRef] 19. Tan, Y.; Wei, B.; Diao, Y.; Zhou, X. Spatial corner effects of long and narrow multipropped deep excavations in Shanghai soft clay. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. ASCE 2014, 28, 04014015. [CrossRef] 20. Du, Y.J.; Fan, R.D.; Liu, S.Y.; Reddy, K.R.; Jin, F. Workability, compressibility and hydraulic conductivity of zeolite-amended clayey soil/calcium-bentonite backfills for slurry-trench cutoff walls. Eng. Geol. 2015, 195, 258–268. [CrossRef] Water 2016, 8, 447 17 of 17

21. Shen, S.L.; Xu, Y.S. Numerical evaluation of land subsidence induced by groundwater pumping in Shanghai. Can. Geotech. J. 2011, 48, 1378–1392. [CrossRef] 22. Zhang, N.; Shen, S.L.; Wu, H.N.; Chai, J.C.; Yin, Z.Y. Evaluation of performance of embankments with reinforcement on PVD-improved marine clay. Geotext. Geomembr. 2015, 43, 506–514. [CrossRef] 23. Xu, Y.S.; Shen, S.L.; Ma, L.; Sun, W.J.; Yin, Z.Y. Evaluation of the blocking effect of retaining walls on groundwater seepage in aquifers with different insertion depths. Eng. Geol. 2014, 183, 254–264. [CrossRef] 24. Deng, J.L.; Shen, S.L.; Xu, Y.S. Investigation into pluvial flooding hazards caused by heavy rain and protection measures in Shanghai, China. Nat. Hazards 2016.[CrossRef] 25. Shen, S.L.; Wang, J.P.; Wu, H.N.; Xu, Y.S.; Ye, G.L. Evaluation of hydraulic conductivity for both marine and deltaic deposits based on piezocone testing. Ocean Eng. 2015, 110, 174–182. [CrossRef] 26. Shen, S.L.; Wu, Y.X.; Xu, Y.S.; Hino, T.; Wu, H.N. Evaluation of hydraulic parameter based on groundwater pumping test of multi-aquifer system of Tianjin. Comput. Geotech. 2015, 68, 196–207. [CrossRef] 27. Nerimitknornburee, A.; Horpibulsuk, S.; Chinkulkijniwat, A.; Arulrajah, A.; Disfani, M.M. Durability against wetting-drying cycles of sustainable lightweight cellular cemented construction material comprising clay and fly ash waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 41–49. [CrossRef] 28. Liu, K.L.; Yao, C.; Chen, J.; Li, Z.; Li, Q.; Sun, L. Comparison of three updating models for real time forecasting: A case study of flood forecasting at the middle reaches of the Huai River in East China. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2016, 1–14. [CrossRef] 29. Wang, Y. Advances in remote sensing of flooding. Water 2015, 7, 6404–6410. [CrossRef] 30. Gao, T.; Shi, X. Spatio-temporal characteristics of extreme precipitation events during 1951–2011 in Shandong, China and possible connection to the large scale atmospheric circulation. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2016, 30, 1421–1440. [CrossRef] 31. Liu, R.; Chen, Y.; Wu, J.; Gao, L.; Barrett, D.; Xu, T.; Li, L.; Huang, C.; Yu, J. Assessing spatial likelihood of flooding hazard using naïve Bayes and GIS: A case study in Bowen Basin, Australia. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2016, 30, 1575–1590. [CrossRef] 32. Peck, R.B. Deep excavation and tunneling in soft ground. In Proceeding of the Seventh International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Mexico City, Mexico, 28–29 August 1969. 33. Shen, S.L.; Wu, H.N.; Cui, Y.J.; Yin, Z.Y. Long-term settlement behavior of the metro tunnel in Shanghai. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2014, 40, 309–323. [CrossRef] 34. Zemtsov, S.P.; Goryachko, M.D.; Baburin, V.L.; Krylenko, I.N.; Yumina, N.M. Integrated assessment of socio-economic risks of hazardous hydrological phenomena in Slavyansk municipal district. Nat. Hazards 2016, 82, S43–S61. [CrossRef] 35. Christakos, G.; Serre, M.L. Spatiotemporal analysis of environmental exposure–health effect associations. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2000, 10, 168–187. [CrossRef][PubMed] 36. Shen, S.L.; Ma, L.; Xu, Y.S.; Yin, Z.Y. Interpretation of increased deformation rate in aquifer IV due to groundwater pumping in Shanghai. Can. Geotech. J. 2013, 50, 1129–1142. [CrossRef] 37. Gong, Y.W.; Liang, X.Y.; Li, X.N.; Li, J.Q.; Fang, X.; Song, R.N. Influence of rainfall characteristics on Total suspended solids in urban runoff: A case study in Beijing, China. Water 2016, 8, 278. [CrossRef] 38. Guangzhou Meteorological Data Sharing Network (GMDSN). Available online: http://data.gz121.gov.cn/ weather/index.jsp (accessed on 11 May 2016). 39. Qian, Q.H. Present state, problems and development trends of urban underground space in China. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2016, 55, 280–289. 40. Li, X.; Li, J.; Fang, X.; Gong, Y.; Wang, W. Case studies of the sponge city program in China. World Environ. Water Resour. Congr. 2016.[CrossRef] 41. Zhang, L.; Wu, X.; Ding, L.; Skibniewski, M.J.; Lu, Y. Bim-based risk identification system in tunnel construction. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2016, 22, 529–539. [CrossRef] 42. Marzouk, M.; Abdelaty, A. Monitoring thermal comfort in subways using building information modeling. Energy Build. 2014, 84, 252–257. [CrossRef]

© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).