Sample Thesis Title with a Concise And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sample Thesis Title with a Concise And Comparative genome analysis in rodent models of Parkinson’s disease and spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 by Nivretta Thatra B.S. Neurobiology, The University of Washington, 2014 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Bioinformatics) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) May 2019 © Nivretta Thatra, 2019 The following individuals certify that they have read, and recommend to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies for acceptance, a thesis/dissertation entitled: Comparative genome analysis in rodent models of Parkinson’s disease and spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 submitted by Nivretta Thatra in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Bioinformatics Examining Committee: Dr. Jörg Gsponer Co-supervisor Dr. Paul Pavlidis Co-supervisor Dr. Sara Mostafavi Supervisory Committee Member Dr. Weihong Song Additional Examiner Additional Supervisory Committee Members: Dr. Martin Hirst Supervisory Committee Member Supervisory Committee Member ii Abstract The shared hallmarks of neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) – notably, the existence of protein deposits,1 selective vulnerability of cell types,2 chronic neuroimmune response,3 and early dysfunction in brain vasculature4 – support the idea of studying different transgenic models relevant to NDs in concert rather than separately. Indeed, transgenic models of different NDs, namely Parkinson’s disease (PD) and spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3), show comparable behavioral abnormalities and some similarities in cell loss. In this project, we hypothesized the reflection of these previously characterized similarities at the transcriptomic level in transgenic models of PD and SCA3, and that prioritizing overlaps in gene expression across transgenic models might allow the identification of genes that are involved in pathological pathways relevant to more than one ND. I show in an unpublished dataset of rodent transcriptomes from two time points and up to three brain regions that most overlaps in gene expression patterns are specific both to the brain region and time point from which samples are obtained. Overlaps in gene expression are found between transgenic models that study the effects of the same gene, synuclein alpha (Snca). In examining the overlaps of the interpretations of gene expression via cell type proportional estimations and functional analysis, I find commonalities across models suggesting changes in endothelial cells at the earlier time point and oligodendrocytes at the later time point. iii Lay Summary Many neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) share common features, like the death of specific brain cells and protein deposits in brain cells. With therapeutic aims, researchers hope to find genes associated with these protein deposits or dying brain cells that can be targeted by drugs to help those with NDs. Since brain tissue from humans is difficult to obtain, many investigations are conducted with animal models that are relevant to human disease. In this project, I looked for gene overlaps in rodent models that are relevant to two human NDs (Parkinson’s disease and spinocerebellar ataxia type 3). I show that most overlaps in gene expression occur when the rodent models are related to each other. Otherwise, overlaps in gene expression seem to be associated with changes in brain cell type proportion estimations, perhaps due to cell death. iv Preface The research initiative presented in this paper – to compare different transgenic models of neurodegenerative diseases – was originally proposed in the NeuroGEM project, which both my supervisors Dr. Jörg Gsponer and Dr. Pavlidis are a part of. Our collaborator and NeuroGEM member Dr. Olaf Riess of The University of Tübingen was responsible for overseeing collection of the data by members of his group before it was sent our way. Following data transfer, I was responsible for the analysis of the data presented here. I wrote this thesis with suggestions from Drs. Gsponer and Pavlidis. All chapters and results are as yet unpublished, though manuscripts are planned. v Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... iii Lay Summary ............................................................................................................................... iv Preface .............................................................................................................................................v Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... xii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. xiii List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. xiv Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................xv Dedication ................................................................................................................................... xvi Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................1 1.1 Parkinson’s disease ......................................................................................................... 2 1.1.1 SNCA ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.2 Aggregation and toxicity of α-synuclein .................................................................... 4 1.2 Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 .......................................................................................... 5 1.2.1 ATXN3 ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.2.2 Aggregation and toxicity of ataxin-3 .......................................................................... 5 1.3 Overlapping pathways in neurodegenerative diseases .................................................... 6 1.3.1 Aggregation................................................................................................................. 7 1.3.2 Specific cell types ....................................................................................................... 8 1.3.2.1 Cell types in PD .................................................................................................. 9 1.3.2.2 Cell types in SCA3............................................................................................ 10 vi 1.3.2.3 Cell type proportion estimation ........................................................................ 10 1.3.3 Microglia and inflammation ..................................................................................... 11 1.3.4 Parkinsonism and levodopa-responsive PD in SCA3 ............................................... 12 1.4 Current state of rodent models of NDs ......................................................................... 13 1.4.1 Current state of rodent models of PD ....................................................................... 14 1.4.2 SNCA overexpression rat model relevant to PD ....................................................... 15 1.4.3 Snca KO mouse model relevant to PD ..................................................................... 16 1.4.4 Snca KO and SNCA overexpression mouse model relevant to PD ........................... 16 1.4.5 Current state of rodent models of SCA3 ................................................................... 17 1.4.6 Mutant ATXN3 model of SCA3 ................................................................................ 18 1.5 Transcriptional analyses................................................................................................ 18 1.5.1 Transcriptional analyses in rodent models of PD ..................................................... 19 1.5.2 Transcriptional analyses in rodent models of SCA3................................................. 19 1.6 Methods of assessing overlaps of gene lists ................................................................. 20 1.7 Aims .............................................................................................................................. 20 Chapter 2: Materials and methods .............................................................................................22 2.1 Data ............................................................................................................................... 22 2.2 Data quality control and pre-processing ....................................................................... 24 2.3 Fitting linear models ..................................................................................................... 27 2.3.1 Sub-setting the data by age ....................................................................................... 27 2.3.2 Sub-setting the data by age and tissue ...................................................................... 28 2.4 Functional enrichment .................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Genes in Eyecare Geneseyedoc 3 W.M
    Genes in Eyecare geneseyedoc 3 W.M. Lyle and T.D. Williams 15 Mar 04 This information has been gathered from several sources; however, the principal source is V. A. McKusick’s Mendelian Inheritance in Man on CD-ROM. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998. Other sources include McKusick’s, Mendelian Inheritance in Man. Catalogs of Human Genes and Genetic Disorders. Baltimore. Johns Hopkins University Press 1998 (12th edition). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim See also S.P.Daiger, L.S. Sullivan, and B.J.F. Rossiter Ret Net http://www.sph.uth.tmc.edu/Retnet disease.htm/. Also E.I. Traboulsi’s, Genetic Diseases of the Eye, New York, Oxford University Press, 1998. And Genetics in Primary Eyecare and Clinical Medicine by M.R. Seashore and R.S.Wappner, Appleton and Lange 1996. M. Ridley’s book Genome published in 2000 by Perennial provides additional information. Ridley estimates that we have 60,000 to 80,000 genes. See also R.M. Henig’s book The Monk in the Garden: The Lost and Found Genius of Gregor Mendel, published by Houghton Mifflin in 2001 which tells about the Father of Genetics. The 3rd edition of F. H. Roy’s book Ocular Syndromes and Systemic Diseases published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins in 2002 facilitates differential diagnosis. Additional information is provided in D. Pavan-Langston’s Manual of Ocular Diagnosis and Therapy (5th edition) published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins in 2002. M.A. Foote wrote Basic Human Genetics for Medical Writers in the AMWA Journal 2002;17:7-17. A compilation such as this might suggest that one gene = one disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early
    Cellular and Molecular Signatures in the Disease Tissue of Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Stratify Clinical Response to csDMARD-Therapy and Predict Radiographic Progression Frances Humby1,* Myles Lewis1,* Nandhini Ramamoorthi2, Jason Hackney3, Michael Barnes1, Michele Bombardieri1, Francesca Setiadi2, Stephen Kelly1, Fabiola Bene1, Maria di Cicco1, Sudeh Riahi1, Vidalba Rocher-Ros1, Nora Ng1, Ilias Lazorou1, Rebecca E. Hands1, Desiree van der Heijde4, Robert Landewé5, Annette van der Helm-van Mil4, Alberto Cauli6, Iain B. McInnes7, Christopher D. Buckley8, Ernest Choy9, Peter Taylor10, Michael J. Townsend2 & Costantino Pitzalis1 1Centre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK. Departments of 2Biomarker Discovery OMNI, 3Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Genentech Research and Early Development, South San Francisco, California 94080 USA 4Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands 5Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology & Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 6Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Policlinico of the University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy 7Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8TA, UK 8Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing (IIA), University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK 9Institute of
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Stromal Reprogramming in Benign and Malignant Naturally Occurring Canine Mammary Tumours Identifies Disease-Promoting Stromal Components
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/783621; this version posted September 26, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Differential stromal reprogramming in benign and malignant naturally occurring canine mammary tumours identifies disease-promoting stromal components Parisa Amini 1,a, Sina Nassiri 2,a, Alexandra Malbon 3,4 and Enni Markkanen 1,* 1 Institute of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland 2 Bioinformatics Core Facility, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland 3 Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland 4 current address: The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG a these authors contributed equally to the manuscript * Correspondence: [email protected]; ORCID: 0000-0001-7780-8233 Keywords Laser-capture microdissection, canine mammary carcinoma, canine mammary adenoma, breast cancer, tumour stroma, tumour microenvironment Summary statement: RNasequencing-based analysis of stromal reprogramming between benign and malignant naturally occurring canine mammary tumours identifies potential molecular drivers in cancer-associated stroma that support tumour growth and malignancy. Abstract The importance of cancer-associated stroma (CaS) for initiation and progression of cancer is well accepted. However, as stromal changes in benign forms of naturally occurring tumours are poorly understood, it remains unclear how CaS from benign and malignant tumours compare. Spontaneous canine mammary tumours are viewed as excellent models of human mammary carcinomas (mCa).
    [Show full text]
  • A Unique and Specific Interaction Between Αt-Catenin and Plakophilin
    2126 Research Article A unique and specific interaction between ␣T-catenin and plakophilin-2 in the area composita, the mixed-type junctional structure of cardiac intercalated discs Steven Goossens1,2,*, Barbara Janssens1,2,*,‡, Stefan Bonné1,2,§, Riet De Rycke1,2, Filip Braet1,2,¶, Jolanda van Hengel1,2 and Frans van Roy1,2,** 1Department for Molecular Biomedical Research, VIB and 2Department of Molecular Biology, Ghent University, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium *These authors contributed equally to this work ‡Present address: Wiley-VCH, Boschstrasse 12, D-69469 Weinheim, Germany §Present address: Diabetes Research Center, Brussels Free University (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium ¶Present address: Australian Key Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia **Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 24 April 2007 Journal of Cell Science 120, 2126-2136 Published by The Company of Biologists 2007 doi:10.1242/jcs.004713 Summary Alpha-catenins play key functional roles in cadherin- desmosomal proteins in the heart localize not only to the catenin cell-cell adhesion complexes. We previously desmosomes in the intercalated discs but also at adhering reported on ␣T-catenin, a novel member of the ␣-catenin junctions with hybrid composition. We found that in the protein family. ␣T-catenin is expressed predominantly in latter junctions, endogenous plakophilin-2 colocalizes with cardiomyocytes, where it colocalizes with ␣E-catenin at the ␣T-catenin. By providing an extra link between the intercalated discs. Whether ␣T- and ␣E-catenin have cadherin-catenin complex and intermediate filaments, the specific or synergistic functions remains unknown. In this binding of ␣T-catenin to plakophilin-2 is proposed to be a study we used the yeast two-hybrid approach to identify means of modulating and strengthening cell-cell adhesion specific functions of ␣T-catenin.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • Figure S1. HAEC ROS Production and ML090 NOX5-Inhibition
    Figure S1. HAEC ROS production and ML090 NOX5-inhibition. (a) Extracellular H2O2 production in HAEC treated with ML090 at different concentrations and 24 h after being infected with GFP and NOX5-β adenoviruses (MOI 100). **p< 0.01, and ****p< 0.0001 vs control NOX5-β-infected cells (ML090, 0 nM). Results expressed as mean ± SEM. Fold increase vs GFP-infected cells with 0 nM of ML090. n= 6. (b) NOX5-β overexpression and DHE oxidation in HAEC. Representative images from three experiments are shown. Intracellular superoxide anion production of HAEC 24 h after infection with GFP and NOX5-β adenoviruses at different MOIs treated or not with ML090 (10 nM). MOI: Multiplicity of infection. Figure S2. Ontology analysis of HAEC infected with NOX5-β. Ontology analysis shows that the response to unfolded protein is the most relevant. Figure S3. UPR mRNA expression in heart of infarcted transgenic mice. n= 12-13. Results expressed as mean ± SEM. Table S1: Altered gene expression due to NOX5-β expression at 12 h (bold, highlighted in yellow). N12hvsG12h N18hvsG18h N24hvsG24h GeneName GeneDescription TranscriptID logFC p-value logFC p-value logFC p-value family with sequence similarity NM_052966 1.45 1.20E-17 2.44 3.27E-19 2.96 6.24E-21 FAM129A 129. member A DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog. NM_001130182 2.19 9.83E-20 2.94 2.90E-19 3.01 1.68E-19 DNAJA4 subfamily A. member 4 phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate- NM_021127 0.93 1.84E-12 2.41 1.32E-17 2.69 1.43E-18 PMAIP1 induced protein 1 E2F7 E2F transcription factor 7 NM_203394 0.71 8.35E-11 2.20 2.21E-17 2.48 1.84E-18 DnaJ (Hsp40) homolog.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Memory and Reduced Anxiety in Δ-Catenin Transgenic Mice T Taeyong Ryua,1, Hyung Joon Parkb,1, Hangun Kimc, Young-Chang Choa, Byeong C
    Experimental Neurology 318 (2019) 22–31 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Experimental Neurology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yexnr Research Paper Improved memory and reduced anxiety in δ-catenin transgenic mice T Taeyong Ryua,1, Hyung Joon Parkb,1, Hangun Kimc, Young-Chang Choa, Byeong C. Kimd, ⁎ ⁎⁎ Jihoon Jod, Young-Woo Seoe, Won-Seok Choib, , Kwonseop Kima, a College of Pharmacy and Research Institute for Drug Development, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea b School of Biological Sciences and Technology, College of Natural Sciences, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea c College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sunchon National University, Sunchon 57922, Republic of Korea d Department of Neurology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwnagju 61469, Republic of Korea e Korea Basic Science Institute, Gwangju Center, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: δ-Catenin is abundant in the brain and affects its synaptic plasticity. Furthermore, loss of δ-catenin is related to δ-Catenin the deficits of learning and memory, mental retardation (cri-du-chat syndrome), and autism. A few studies about N-cadherin δ-catenin deficiency mice were performed. However, the effect of δ-catenin overexpression in the brain has not Glutamate receptor been investigated as yet. Therefore we generated a δ-catenin overexpressing mouse model. To generate a Memory transgenic mouse model overexpressing δ-catenin in the brain, δ-catenin plasmid having a Thy-1 promotor was Sociability microinjected in C57BL/6 mice. Our results showed δ-catenin transgenic mice expressed higher levels of N- Anxiety cadherin, β-catenin, and p120-catenin than did wild type mice.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials
    Supplementary material. S1. Images from automatic imaging reader Cytation™ 1. A, A’, A’’ present the same field of view. Cells migrating from the upper compartment of the inserts are stained with DID (red color), Cell nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue color). A’ and A’’ demonstrate the method of analysis (A’ – nuclei numbering, A’’ – migrating cells numbering), scale bar – 300 µm. ASC BM-MSC Y BM-MSC A mean SEM mean SEM mean SEM CXCL6 2.240 0.727 4.158 0.677 2.149 1.816 CXCL16 4.277 0.248 0.763 0.405 1.130 0.346 CXCL12 -2.855 0.483 -4.528 0.226 -3.616 0.318 SMAD3 -0.511 0.191 -1.522 0.188 -1.332 0.215 TGFB2 3.742 0.533 1.238 0.210 0.990 0.568 COL14A 1.532 0.357 -0.397 0.736 -1.522 0.469 MHX 1.397 0.414 1.145 0.412 0.642 0.613 SCX 2.984 0.301 2.062 0.320 2.031 0.249 RUNX2 3.290 0.359 2.319 0.388 2.546 0.529 PPRAG 1.720 0.303 2.926 0.423 2.912 0.215 Supplementary material S3. The table provides the mean Δct and SEM values for all genes and all groups analyzed in this study (n=8 in each group). Supplementary material S2. The table provides the list of genes which displayed significantly different expression between hASCs and hBM-MSCs A based on microarray nr Exp p-value Exp Fold Change ID Symbol Entrez Gene Name 1 2.84E-05 16.896 16960355 TM4SF1 transmembrane 4 L six family member 1 2 9.10E-09 12.238 16684080 IFI6 interferon alpha inducible protein 6 3 3.93E-08 11.851 16667702 VCAM1 vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 4 1.54E-05 9.944 16840113 CXCL16 C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 16 5 2.01E-06 9.123 16852463 RAB27B RAB27B, member RAS oncogene
    [Show full text]
  • Multivariate Gene Expression Analysis Reveals Functional Connectivity
    BMC Systems Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Multivariate gene expression analysis reveals functional connectivity changes between normal/tumoral prostates André Fujita*1, Luciana Rodrigues Gomes2, João Ricardo Sato3, Rui Yamaguchi1, Carlos Eduardo Thomaz4, Mari Cleide Sogayar2 and Satoru Miyano1 Address: 1Human Genome Center, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan, 2Chemistry Institute, University of São Paulo, Av. Lineu Prestes, 748, São Paulo-SP, 05508-900, Brazil, 3Mathematics, Computation and Cognition Center, Universidade Federal do ABC, Rua Santa Adélia, 166 – Santo André, 09210-170, Brazil and 4Department of Electrical Engineering, Centro Universitário da FEI, Av. Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco, 3972 – São Bernardo do Campo, 09850-901, Brazil Email: André Fujita* - [email protected] ; Luciana Rodrigues Gomes - [email protected]; João [email protected]; Rui Yamaguchi - [email protected]; Carlos Eduardo Thomaz - [email protected]; Mari Cleide Sogayar - [email protected]; Satoru Miyano - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 5 December 2008 Received: 29 August 2008 Accepted: 5 December 2008 BMC Systems Biology 2008, 2:106 doi:10.1186/1752-0509-2-106 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1752-0509/2/106 © 2008 Fujita et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Prostate cancer is a leading cause of death in the male population, therefore, a comprehensive study about the genes and the molecular networks involved in the tumoral prostate process becomes necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material Computational Prediction of SARS
    Supplementary_Material Computational prediction of SARS-CoV-2 encoded miRNAs and their putative host targets Sheet_1 List of potential stem-loop structures in SARS-CoV-2 genome as predicted by VMir. Rank Name Start Apex Size Score Window Count (Absolute) Direct Orientation 1 MD13 2801 2864 125 243.8 61 2 MD62 11234 11286 101 211.4 49 4 MD136 27666 27721 104 205.6 119 5 MD108 21131 21184 110 204.7 210 9 MD132 26743 26801 119 188.9 252 19 MD56 9797 9858 128 179.1 59 26 MD139 28196 28233 72 170.4 133 28 MD16 2934 2974 76 169.9 71 43 MD103 20002 20042 80 159.3 403 46 MD6 1489 1531 86 156.7 171 51 MD17 2981 3047 131 152.8 38 87 MD4 651 692 75 140.3 46 95 MD7 1810 1872 121 137.4 58 116 MD140 28217 28252 72 133.8 62 122 MD55 9712 9758 96 132.5 49 135 MD70 13171 13219 93 130.2 131 164 MD95 18782 18820 79 124.7 184 173 MD121 24086 24135 99 123.1 45 176 MD96 19046 19086 75 123.1 179 196 MD19 3197 3236 76 120.4 49 200 MD86 17048 17083 73 119.8 428 223 MD75 14534 14600 137 117 51 228 MD50 8824 8870 94 115.8 79 234 MD129 25598 25642 89 115.6 354 Reverse Orientation 6 MR61 19088 19132 88 197.8 271 10 MR72 23563 23636 148 188.8 286 11 MR11 3775 3844 136 185.1 116 12 MR94 29532 29582 94 184.6 271 15 MR43 14973 15028 109 183.9 226 27 MR14 4160 4206 89 170 241 34 MR35 11734 11792 111 164.2 37 52 MR5 1603 1652 89 152.7 118 53 MR57 18089 18132 101 152.7 139 94 MR8 2804 2864 122 137.4 38 107 MR58 18474 18508 72 134.9 237 117 MR16 4506 4540 72 133.8 311 120 MR34 10010 10048 82 132.7 245 133 MR7 2534 2578 90 130.4 75 146 MR79 24766 24808 75 127.9 59 150 MR65 21528 21576 99 127.4 83 180 MR60 19016 19049 70 122.5 72 187 MR51 16450 16482 75 121 363 190 MR80 25687 25734 96 120.6 75 198 MR64 21507 21544 70 120.3 35 206 MR41 14500 14542 84 119.2 94 218 MR84 26840 26894 108 117.6 94 Sheet_2 List of stable stem-loop structures based on MFE.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of RNA Bound to the TDP-43 Ribonucleoprotein Complex in the Adult Mouse Brain
    Identification of RNA bound to the TDP-43 ribonucleoprotein complex in the adult mouse brain Running Title: Identification of RNA bound to TDP-43 Ramesh K. Narayanan1, Marie Mangelsdorf1, Ajay Panwar1, Tim J. Butler1, Peter G. Noakes1,2, Robyn H. Wallace1,3* 1Queensland Brain Institute, 2School of Biomedical Sciences, 3School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Objectives. Cytoplasmic inclusions containing TDP-43 are a pathological hallmark of several neurodegenerative disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia. TDP-43 is an RNA binding protein involved in gene regulation through control of RNA transcription, splicing and transport. However, the function of TDP-43 in the nervous system is largely unknown and its role in the pathogenesis of ALS is unclear. The aim of this study was to identify genes in the central nervous system that are regulated by TDP-43. Methods. RNA-immunoprecipitation with anti-TDP-43 antibody, followed by microarray analysis (RIP- chip), was used to isolate and identify RNA bound to TDP-43 protein from mouse brain. Results. This analysis produced a list of 1,839 potential TDP-43 gene targets, many of which overlap with previous studies and whose functions include RNA processing and synaptic function. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that the TDP-43 protein could be found at the presynaptic membrane of axon terminals in the neuromuscular junction in mice. Conclusions. The finding that TDP-43 binds to RNA that codes for genes related to synaptic function, together with the localisation of TDP-43 protein at axon terminals, suggest a role for TDP-43 in the transport of synaptic mRNAs into distal processes.
    [Show full text]