Advances in Radiation Oncology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Advances in Radiation Oncology Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Radiation Oncology Departments in Brazil --Manuscript Draft-- Manuscript Number: ADVANCESRADONC-D-20-00407R3 Article Type: Scientific Article Section/Category: COVID-19 Corresponding Author: Harley Francisco de Oliveira, PhD Centro de Tratamento em Radio-Oncologia (CTR) and Fundação São Francisco Xavier (FSFX) - Hospital Márcio Cunha Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo BRAZIL First Author: Harley Francisco de Oliveira, PhD Order of Authors: Harley Francisco de Oliveira, PhD Gerson Hiroshi Yoshinari Jr, PhD Igor Moreira Veras, MD Wilson José de Almeida Jr, MD Nilceana Maya Aires Freitas, PhD Marcus Simões Castilho, MD Antônio Cassio de Assis Pellizzon, PhD Felipe Erlich, MD Renato José Affonso Jr, PhD Ícaro Thiago de Carvalho, MD André Campana Correia-Leite, MD Felipe Quintino Kuhnen, MD Rosa Maria Xavier Faria Najas, MD Arthur Accioly Rosa, MD Abstract: Purpose : The COVID-19 pandemic brought several challenges to cancer practice, especially to ensure continuity of treatment during this period, minimizing the risks of transmission to a vulnerable population. For Radiation Oncology departments in Brazil, this contingency has become even more complex due to the significant impact observed in different sectors of society, the large number of cases and deaths by COVID-19. This study estimated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Brazilian Radiation Oncology departments and the coping measures used in the country. Methods and Materials: The Brazilian Radiotherapy Society (SBRT) developed a questionnaire with 14 questions, sent to all heads of Radiation Oncology departments in the country, between May and June 2020. These data were evaluated regarding cases confirmed and deaths by COVID-19 in epidemiological week 28, on July 11, 2020. Results: One hundred twenty-six questionnaires from different regions were answered, representing 44% of the country’s services. A drop in the number of patients was observed in 61% of services. This drop was observed both in patients from the public and supplementary private health insurance systems. Regarding patients and employees with COVID-19, we observe that services that primarily treat SUS patients reported significantly fewer cases of the disease. About half of the services had collaborators and patients during radiotherapy with a positive diagnosis of COVID-19. Among the coping measures, the services used intensified hygiene and cleanliness, distance, restrictions on access to companions and other changes in daily practice. Conclusions: Thus, there was an important drop in the number of radiotherapy patients in the country during the pandemic, and this impact happened in a similar way among the services, regardless of their characteristics and coping measures adopted during the pandemic. Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation Title Page (WITH Author Details) Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Radiation Oncology Departments in Brazil Impact of COVID-19 on Brazilian Radiotherapy Harley F. Oliveira, PhD a*; Gerson H. Yoshinari Jr, PhD b; Igor M. Veras, MD c; Wilson J. de Almeida Jr, MD d; Nilceana M. A. Freitas, PhD e; Marcus S. Castilho, MD f; Antônio C. de A. Pellizzon, PhD g; Felipe Erlich, MD h; Renato J. Affonso Jr, MD i; Ícaro T. de Carvalho, MD j; André C. C. Leite, MD k; Felipe Q. Kuhnen, MD l; Rosa M. X. F. Najas, MD m; Arthur Accioly Rosa, MD n a. Radiotherapy Department of the Centro de Tratamento em Radio-Oncologia (CTR), Ribeirão Preto/SP; Márcio Cunha Hospital – Fundação São Francisco Xavier, Ipatinga/MG – Brazil. b. Faculty of Medicine of Itajuba – Afya group, Itajubá/MG; Radiotherapy Department of the Oncominas, Pouso Alegre/MG – Brazil. c. Radiotherapy Department of the Regional Integrated Oncology Center, Fortaleza/CE – Brazil. d. Radiotherapy Department of the Moinhos dos Ventos Hospital, Porto Alegre/RS – Brazil. e. Radiotherapy Department of the Araújo Jorge Hospital of the Góias State Association Against Cancer, Goiânia/GO – Brazil. f. Radiotherapy Department of the Felicio Rocho Hospital, Belo Horizonte/MG – Brazil. g. Radiotherapy Department of the AC Camargo Hospital, São Paulo/SP – Brazil. h. Radiotherapy Department of the José Alencar Gomes da Silva National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro/RJ – Brazil. i. Radiotherapy Department of the Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos/SP – Brazil. j. Radiotherapy Department of the Albert Einstein Hospital, São Paulo/SP – Brazil. k. Radiotherapy Department of the Dom Pedro de Alcantara Hospital, Feira de Santana/BA – Brazil. l. Radiotherapy Department of the Charity Hospital of Florianópolis, Florianópolis/SC – Brazil. m. Radiotherapy Department of the Rio Grande do Norte State League Against Cancer, Natal/RN – Brazil. n. Radiotherapy Department of the Santa Izabel Hospital and Português da Bahia Hospital, Salvador/BA; Director of Radiotherapy Oncoclinicas Group; President of the Brazilian Radiotherapy Society (SBRT), São Paulo/SP – Brazil. Corresponding Author: Harley Francisco de Oliveira, PhD; e-mail: [email protected] Author Responsible for Statistical Analysis: Gerson Hiroshi Yoshinari Júnior, PhD; e-mail: [email protected] Disclosures: none. Sources of support: This work had no specific funding. Research data are available at: www.sbradioterapia.com.br Acknowledgements: The Brazilian Radiotherapy Society (SBRT) thanks to the Brazilian radiation oncology departments for keeping the radiotherapy to the patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Summary Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Radiation Oncology Departments in Brazil The Brazilian Radiotherapy Society (SBRT) developed a questionnaire for estimated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Brazilian Radiation Oncology departments (RO). These data were evaluated regarding cases confirmed and deaths by COVID-19 on July 11, 2020. 126 questionnaires were answered (44% of the RO). A drop in the number of patients was observed in 61% of RO, being observed both in patients from the public and supplementary private health insurance systems. BLINDED Revised Manuscript (Unmarked) Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Radiation Oncology Departments in Brazil Abstract: Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic brought several challenges to cancer practice, especially to ensure continuity of treatment during this period, minimizing the risks of transmission to a vulnerable population. For Radiation Oncology departments in Brazil, this contingency has become even more complex due to the significant impact observed in different sectors of society, the large number of cases and deaths by COVID-19. This study estimated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Brazilian Radiation Oncology departments and the coping measures used in the country. Methods and Materials: The Brazilian Radiotherapy Society (SBRT) developed a questionnaire with 14 questions, sent to all heads of Radiation Oncology departments in the country, between May and June 2020. These data were evaluated regarding cases confirmed and deaths by COVID-19 in epidemiological week 28, on July 11, 2020. Results: One hundred twenty-six questionnaires from different regions were answered, representing 44% of the country’s services. A drop in the number of patients was observed in 61% of services. This drop was observed both in patients from the public and supplementary private health insurance systems. Regarding patients and employees with COVID-19, we observe that services that primarily treat SUS patients reported significantly fewer cases of the disease. About half of the services had collaborators and patients during radiotherapy with a positive diagnosis of COVID-19. Among the coping measures, the services used intensified hygiene and cleanliness, distance, restrictions on access to companions and other changes in daily practice. Conclusions: Thus, there was an important drop in the number of radiotherapy patients in the country during the pandemic, and this impact happened in a similar way among the services, regardless of their characteristics and coping measures adopted during the pandemic. Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic declared by the World Health Organization (WHO), given the growing incidence and the complex repercussion observed in different social environments worldwide, requires comprehensive care for the population, especially those with associated comorbidities 1. In this context, patients diagnosed with cancer have a higher risk of severe infections and mortality, especially during cancer treatment, in which they are in vulnerable conditions. The COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) 2 and Thoracic Cancers International COVID-19 Collaboration (TERAVOLT) 3 ran studies with COVID-19 patients. They identified that patients with advanced age, male gender, impaired functional status, and associated comorbidities, such as hypertension, chronic lung disease, diabetes, and active cancer under treatment have a higher risk of morbidity and mortality 2–5. To minimize the impact of the intense demand caused by the increase in the number of contaminants in the country, above its installed capacities, several contingency measures for health services have been proposed in order to guarantee access to patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by the new Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Thus, medical care considered elective and those procedures of less complexity and low risk of aggravation were suspended in almost all health services in Brazil. However, even patients with a high suspicion of cancer had delayed
Recommended publications
  • GVE) E Departamentos Regionais De Saude (DRS)

    GVE) E Departamentos Regionais De Saude (DRS)

    Lista de municípios, Grupos Regionais de VIgilância Epidemiológica (GVE) e Departamentos Regionais de Saude (DRS) Município Regionais (GVE) DRS São Paulo 01 Capital I Capital Diadema 07 Santo Andre I Capital Mauá 07 Santo Andre I Capital Ribeirão Pires 07 Santo Andre I Capital Rio Grande da Serra 07 Santo Andre I Capital Santo André 07 Santo Andre I Capital São Bernardo do Campo 07 Santo Andre I Capital São Caetano do Sul 07 Santo Andre I Capital Aruja 08 Mogi das Cruzes I Capital Biritiba-Mirim 08 Mogi das Cruzes I Capital Ferraz de Vasconcelos 08 Mogi das Cruzes I Capital Guararema 08 Mogi das Cruzes I Capital Guarulhos 08 Mogi das Cruzes I Capital Itaquaquecetuba 08 Mogi das Cruzes I Capital Moji das Cruzes 08 Mogi das Cruzes I Capital Poá 08 Mogi das Cruzes I Capital Salesópolis 08 Mogi das Cruzes I Capital Santa Isabel 08 Mogi das Cruzes I Capital Suzano 08 Mogi das Cruzes I Capital Caieiras 09 Franco da Rocha I Capital Cajamar 09 Franco da Rocha I Capital Francisco Morato 09 Franco da Rocha I Capital Franco da Rocha 09 Franco da Rocha I Capital Mairiporã 09 Franco da Rocha I Capital Barueri 10 Osasco I Capital Carapicuíba 10 Osasco I Capital Cotia 10 Osasco I Capital Embu 10 Osasco I Capital Embu-Guaçu 10 Osasco I Capital Itapecerica da Serra 10 Osasco I Capital Itapevi 10 Osasco I Capital Jandira 10 Osasco I Capital Juquitiba 10 Osasco I Capital Osasco 10 Osasco I Capital Pirapora do Bom Jesus 10 Osasco I Capital Santana de Parnaíba 10 Osasco I Capital São Lourenço da Serra 10 Osasco I Capital Taboão da Serra 10 Osasco I Capital
  • São Paulo Serra Negra Holambra Adamantina

    São Paulo Serra Negra Holambra Adamantina

    SÃO PAULO SERRA NEGRA HOLAMBRA ADAMANTINA ADOLFO AGUAS DE LINDOIA AGUAS DE SANTA BARBARA AGUAS DE SAO PEDRO AGUDOS ALAMBARI ALTAIR ALTINOPOLIS ALUMINIO ALVARES FLORENCE ALVARES MACHADO ALVARO DE CARVALHO ALVINLANDIA AMERICANA AMERICO BRASILIENSE AMERICO DE CAMPOS AMPARO ANALANDIA ANDRADINA ANGATUBA ANHEMBI ANHUMAS APARECIDA APARECIDA DOESTE APIAI ARACARIGUAMA ARACATUBA ARACOIABA DA SERRA ARAMINA ARANDU ARAPEI ARARAQUARA ARARAS AREALVA AREIAS AREIOPOLIS ARIRANHA ARTUR NOGUEIRA ARUJA ASPASIA ASSIS ATIBAIA AURIFLAMA AVAI AVANHANDAVA AVARE BALBINOS BALSAMO BANANAL BARBOSA BARIRI BARRA BONITA BARRA DO CHAPEU BARRA DO TURVO BARRETOS BARRINHA BASTOS BATATAIS BEBEDOURO BENTO DE ABREU BERNARDINO DE CAMPOS BIRIGUI BIRITIBA-MIRIM BOA ESPERANCA DO SUL BOCAINA BOITUVA BOM JESUS DOS PERDOES BOM SUCESSO DE ITARARE BORA BORACEIA BOREBI BOTUCATU BRAGANCA PAULISTA BRAUNA BREJO ALEGRE BRODOWSKI BROTAS BURI BURITAMA BURITIZAL CABRALIA PAULISTA CABREUVA CACAPAVA CACHOEIRA PAULISTA CACONDE CAFELANDIA CAIEIRAS CAIUA CAJAMAR CAJATI CAJOBI CAJURU CAMPINA DO MONTE ALEGRE CAMPINAS CAMPO LIMPO PAULISTA CAMPOS DO JORDAO CAMPOS NOVOS PAULISTA CANANEIA CANAS CANDIDO MOTA CANDIDO RODRIGUES CANITAR CAPAO BONITO CAPELA DO ALTO CAPIVARI CARAGUATATUBA CARAPICUIBA CARDOSO CASA BRANCA CASSIA DOS COQUEIROS CASTILHO CATANDUVA CATIGUA CEDRAL CERQUEIRA CESAR CERQUILHO CESARIO LANGE CHARQUEADA CHAVANTES CLEMENTINA COLINA COLOMBIA CONCHAL CONCHAS CORDEIROPOLIS COROADOS CORONEL MACEDO CORUMBATAI COSMORAMA COTIA CRAVINHOS CRISTAIS PAULISTA CRUZALIA CRUZEIRO CUBATAO CUNHA DESCALVADO
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    Research, Society and Development, v. 9, n. 8, e390985188, 2020 (CC BY 4.0) | ISSN 2525-3409 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5188 Comparativos do preço recebido por saca pelos produtores de soja no Brasil Comparisons of the price received per sack by soybean producers in Brazil Comparaciones del precio recibido por saco por los productores de soja en Brasil Recebido: 02/06/2020 | Revisado: 15/06/2020 | Aceito: 27/06/2020 | Publicado: 09/07/2020 Matheus Vinicius Abadia Ventura ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9114-121X Instituto Federal Goiano, campus Rio Verde, Brasil E-mail: [email protected] Leônidas Miclos Baliza ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-3507 Instituto Federal Goiano, campus Rio Verde, Brasil E-mail: [email protected] Hellen Regina Fernandes Batista ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4815-4159 Instituto Federal Goiano, campus Rio Verde, Brasil E-mail: [email protected] Marcio Moacir Bessa ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6267-775X Universidade Estadual Paulista, Brasil E-mail: [email protected] Marcia Rodrigues de Oliveira ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3262-2678 Instituto Federal Goiano, campus Ceres, Brasil Email: [email protected] Alessandra Paixão Aires Lima ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7700-3918 Faculdade Evangélica de Goianésia, Brasil E-mail: [email protected] Resumo A cultura da soja é uma das culturas mais importantes do agronegócio brasileiro e mundial. Dada a importância da cultura da soja para o agronegócio, objetivou-se com este estudo, 1 Research, Society and Development, v. 9, n. 8, e390985188, 2020 (CC BY 4.0) | ISSN 2525-3409 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5188 analisar e comparar os preços pela saca de soja recebida pelos produtores em diferentes municípios, estados e regiões no Brasil.
  • Endereços Cejuscs

    Endereços Cejuscs

    PODER JUDICIÁRIO TRIBUNAL DE JUSTIÇA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO Núcleo Permanente de Métodos Consensuais de Solução de Conflitos Fórum João Mendes Junior, 13º andar – salas 1301/1311 E-mail: [email protected] CENTROS JUDICIÁRIOS DE SOLUÇÃO DE CONFLITOS E CIDADANIA – CEJUSCs ÍNDICE (Clicar na localidade desejada para obtenção do endereço, telefone e e-mail) SÃO PAULO – CAPITAL .............................................................................................................. 7 Cejusc Central – Fórum João Mendes Jr .................................................................................... 7 Butantã - Foro Regional XV ....................................................................................................... 8 Itaquera - Guaianazes - Foro Regional VII .................................................................................. 8 Jabaquara - Foro Regional III ..................................................................................................... 9 Lapa - Foro Regional IV.............................................................................................................. 9 Nossa Senhora do Ó - Foro Regional XII ..................................................................................... 9 Pinheiros - Foro Regional XI....................................................................................................... 9 Santana - Foro Regional I ........................................................................................................ 10 Santo Amaro - Foro
  • GVE I - CAPITAL GRUPO DE PLANEJAMENTO CVE End: Av

    GVE I - CAPITAL GRUPO DE PLANEJAMENTO CVE End: Av

    atualizado em set2020 RELAÇÃO DOS GRUPOS E SUBGRUPOS DE VIGILÂNCIA EPIDEMIOLÓGICA (GVEs / SGVEs) PLANEJAMENTO Diretor: VERA LÚCIA DA GLÓRIA MALHEIRO End.: Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 351 – 6º andar – sala 600 – Cerqueira Cesar – São Paulo/SP CEP: 01246-000 Fone: (11) 3066-8744 Fax: (11) 3082-8216 E-mail: [email protected] GVE I - CAPITAL GRUPO DE PLANEJAMENTO CVE End: Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 351 – 6º andar Fone: (11) 3066-8744 E-mail: [email protected] COD MUN ID_MUNIC MUNIC DRS NOME RRAS COD_RS NOME RS 355030 Sao Paulo 1 DRs I GRANDE SÃO PAULO 6 35016 Sao Paulo 355030 GVE VII - SANTO ANDRÉ Diretor: ANGELA MARIA MOZENA MORIWAKI End.: Rua Independência, 501 – Jd. Bela Vista – Santo André/SP – CEP: 09041-310 Fone: (11) 4421-7246 Fax: (11) 4421-7246 E-mail: [email protected] COD MUN ID_MUNIC MUNIC DRS NOME DRS RRAS COD_RS NOME RS 351380 Diadema 1 DRs I GRANDE SÃO PAULO 1 35015 Grande ABC 351380 352940 Maua 1 DRs I GRANDE SÃO PAULO 1 35015 Grande ABC 352940 354330 Ribeirao Pires 1 DRs I GRANDE SÃO PAULO 1 35015 Grande ABC 354330 354410 Rio Grande da Serra 1 DRs I GRANDE SÃO PAULO 1 35015 Grande ABC 354410 354780 Santo Andre 1 DRs I GRANDE SÃO PAULO 1 35015 Grande ABC 354780 354870 Sao Bernardo do Campo 1 DRs I GRANDE SÃO PAULO 1 35015 Grande ABC 354870 354880 Sao Caetano do Sul 1 DRs I GRANDE SÃO PAULO 1 35015 Grande ABC 354880 GVE VIII - MOGI DAS CRUZES Diretor: RENATA VILLANUEVA ALVES DE TOLEDO End.: Av.
  • Club Health Assessment for District LC 6 Through April 2013

    Club Health Assessment for District LC 6 Through April 2013

    Club Health Assessment for District LC 6 through April 2013 Status Membership Reports Finance LCIF Number of YTD Member Avg. length of Months Yrs. Since Months Donations Times on Status Current YTD YTD YTD Net Count 12 service Since Last No Since Last for current Club Club Charter Current Quo within 2 Member Members Members Net Growth% Months for dropped Last Officer President Active Activity Account Fiscal Number Name Date Status * years Count Added Dropped Growth Ago members MMR *** Report Rotation Email ** Report *** Balance Year If below If net loss If no report When Number Notes the If no report 15 is greater in 3 more than of officers that in 12 members than 20% months one year repeat do not have months appears appears appears in appears in terms an active appears in in red in red red red indicated Email red Clubs less than two years old 119196 POLONI 04/16/2013 Newly Chartered 20 20 0 20 100.00% 0 0 N/R 115298 VOTUPORANGA ABILIO 10/19/2011 Active 30 0 5 -5 -14.29% 37 1 2 8 $1000.00 CALILLE Clubs more than two years old 17249 ALTINOPOLIS 05/01/1970 Active 14 0 3 -3 -17.65% 18 9 2 P,T,M N/R $610.99 56945 AURIFLAMA 05/05/1995 Active 40 3 6 -3 -6.98% 34 3 0 2 T,M 5 $1000.00 17250 BARRETOS 10/08/1961 Active 13 0 3 -3 -18.75% 16 11 0 2 0 17251 BATATAIS 09/18/1966 Active 31 2 0 2 6.90% 32 0 0 $1000.00 33340 BRODOWSKI 02/23/1977 Active 16 2 3 -1 -5.88% 16 2 0 2 0 $1000.00 17253 CAJURU 08/17/1969 Active 1 23 0 2 -2 -8.00% 26 4 1 P,T,M 17 17255 CATANDUVA 02/25/1956 Active 33 2 2 0 0.00% 31 7 0 M 4 17256 CRAVINHOS 03/31/1964 Active 33 7 3
  • Comarca Nomenclatura Da Unidade/Vara Email Da Unidade

    Comarca Nomenclatura Da Unidade/Vara Email Da Unidade

    Comarca Nomenclatura da Unidade/Vara Email da Unidade ADAMANTINA 2ª VARA CÍVEL E DA INFÂNCIA E JUVENTUDE [email protected]; AGUAÍ VARA ÚNICA DA COMARCA DE AGUAÍ [email protected]; ÁGUAS DE LINDÓIA VARA ÚNICA DA COMARCA DE ÁGUAS DE LINDÓIA [email protected]; AGUDOS 2ª VARA DA COMARCA DE AGUDOS [email protected]; ALTINÓPOLIS VARA ÚNICA DA COMARCA DE ALTINÓPOLIS [email protected]; AMERICANA VARA DO JÚRI, EXECUÇÕES CRIMINAIS E DA INFÂNCIA E DA JUVENTUDE DA COMARCA DE AME [email protected]; AMÉRICO BRASILIENSE 2ª VARA JUDICIAL DA COMARCA DE AMÉRICO BRASILIENSE [email protected]; AMPARO 2ª VARA DA COMARCA DE AMPARO [email protected]; ANDRADINA 3ª VARA DA COMARCA DE ANDRADINA [email protected]; ANGATUBA VARA ÚNICA DA COMARCA DE ANGATUBA [email protected]; APARECIDA 2ª VARA DA COMARCA DE APARECIDA [email protected]; APIAÍ VARA ÚNICA DA COMARCA DE APIAÍ [email protected]; ARAÇATUBA 2ª VARA DAS EXECUÇÕES CRIMINAIS E ANEXO DA INFÂNCIA E JUVENTUDE DA COMARCA DE [email protected]; ARARAQUARA VARA DA INFÂNCIA E DA JUVENTUDE E DO IDOSO DA COMARCA DE ARARAQUARA [email protected]; ARARAS VARA CRIMINAL DA COMARCA DE ARARAS [email protected]; ARTUR NOGUEIRA OFICIO JUDICIAL DA COMARCA DE ARTUR NOGUEIRA [email protected]; ARUJÁ 2ª VARA DA COMARCA DE ARUJÁ [email protected]; ASSIS 3ª VARA CRIMINAL E DA INFÂNCIA E JUVENTUDE DA COMARCA DE ASSIS [email protected]; [email protected] ATIBAIA 1ª VARA CRIMINAL, INFÂNCIA E JUVENTUDE DE ATIBAIA [email protected]; AURIFLAMA VARA ÚNICA
  • MUNICÍPIO MÓDULO FISCAL - MF (Ha) (Ha)

    MUNICÍPIO MÓDULO FISCAL - MF (Ha) (Ha)

    QUATRO MFs MUNICÍPIO MÓDULO FISCAL - MF (ha) (ha) ADAMANTINA 20 80 ADOLFO 22 88 AGUAÍ 18 72 ÁGUAS DA PRATA 22 88 ÁGUAS DE LINDÓIA 16 64 ÁGUAS DE SANTA BÁRBARA 30 120 ÁGUAS DE SÃO PEDRO 18 72 AGUDOS 12 48 ALAMBARI 22 88 ALFREDO MARCONDES 22 88 ALTAIR 28 112 ALTINÓPOLIS 22 88 ALTO ALEGRE 30 120 ALUMÍNIO 12 48 ÁLVARES FLORENCE 28 112 ÁLVARES MACHADO 22 88 ÁLVARO DE CARVALHO 14 56 ALVINLÂNDIA 14 56 AMERICANA 12 48 AMÉRICO BRASILIENSE 12 48 AMÉRICO DE CAMPOS 30 120 AMPARO 20 80 ANALÂNDIA 18 72 ANDRADINA 30 120 ANGATUBA 22 88 ANHEMBI 30 120 ANHUMAS 24 96 APARECIDA 24 96 APARECIDA D'OESTE 30 120 APIAÍ 16 64 ARAÇARIGUAMA 12 48 ARAÇATUBA 30 120 ARAÇOIABA DA SERRA 12 48 ARAMINA 20 80 ARANDU 22 88 ARAPEÍ 24 96 ARARAQUARA 12 48 ARARAS 10 40 ARCO-ÍRIS 20 80 AREALVA 14 56 AREIAS 35 140 AREIÓPOLIS 16 64 ARIRANHA 16 64 ARTUR NOGUEIRA 10 40 ARUJÁ 5 20 ASPÁSIA 26 104 ASSIS 20 80 ATIBAIA 16 64 AURIFLAMA 35 140 AVAÍ 14 56 AVANHANDAVA 30 120 AVARÉ 30 120 BADY BASSITT 16 64 BALBINOS 20 80 BÁLSAMO 20 80 BANANAL 24 96 BARÃO DE ANTONINA 20 80 BARBOSA 30 120 BARIRI 16 64 BARRA BONITA 14 56 BARRA DO CHAPÉU 16 64 BARRA DO TURVO 16 64 BARRETOS 22 88 BARRINHA 12 48 BARUERI 7 28 BASTOS 16 64 BATATAIS 22 88 BAURU 12 48 BEBEDOURO 14 56 BENTO DE ABREU 30 120 BERNARDINO DE CAMPOS 20 80 BERTIOGA 10 40 BILAC 30 120 BIRIGUI 30 120 BIRITIBA-MIRIM 5 20 BOA ESPERANÇA DO SUL 12 48 BOCAINA 16 64 BOFETE 20 80 BOITUVA 18 72 BOM JESUS DOS PERDÕES 16 64 BOM SUCESSO DE ITARARÉ 20 80 BORÁ 20 80 BORACÉIA 16 64 BORBOREMA 16 64 BOREBI 12 48 BOTUCATU 20 80 BRAGANÇA PAULISTA 16 64 BRAÚNA
  • CAJOBI Mauro Terra 9

    CAJOBI Mauro Terra 9

    A B C D E F G H I J K L ,&e0 GUARACI BARRETOS OLP.405 ALTAIR GUARACI OLP.132 1 GUARACI 1 2OtPSLD63 322 PELEGRINI OLP.327 OLP.411 VALDOMIRO OLP.405 MUNIC. EST. ROCHA DA OLP.321 ANA OLP.159 OLP.411 6$17 2 RIBEIRO DOS OLP.412 2 ESTRADA OLP.216 SANTOS OLP.334 ARGEMIRO OLP.414 ANTUNES MUNIC. FERREIRA IBITU OLP.217 EST. OLP.132 OLP.323 OLP.421 EST. OLP.216 OLP.327 MUNIC. ONDA VERDE OLP.218 OLP.218 OLP.420 PAULO BARRETOS V I S T A OLP.424 B O A RIBEIRO OLP.426 OLP.183 N CORREGO MUNIC. DE OLP.218 EST. LIMA ABIHAIDAR FAUZE OLP.426 3 OLP.421 3 SAPO NE COR. DO NW COR. FUNDO CUNHA OLP.425 OLP.424 COR. OLP.334 OLP.132 OLP.440 DA MACRO ZONEAMENTO DO MUNICIPIO OLP.175 MANOEL W E TAPERA OLP.347 OLP.430 '(2/Ë03,$63 OLP.431 DE OLP.432 VIA OLP.436 OLP.361 425 OLP.433 OLP.429 OLP.323 OLP.350 OLP.434 OLP.183 ALEGRE SE EST. OLP.438 MACROZONA URBANA OLP.428 MUNIC. COR SW ADRIANO SPONQUIADO OLP.437 OLP.435 4 S 4 OLP.436 OLP.350 R I OLP.439 OLP.361 OLP.323 B A OLP.437 0$&52=21$'((;3$1d­2 L A M &yUUHJRGR%DJXDoX URBANA FUTURA DO OLP.433 RODOVIA OLP.050 %$*8$d8 GERONIMO COR &yUUHJRGR0RUHLUD NEVES OLP.175 M. MACROZONA RURAL OLP.050 OLP.382 OLP.440 AYUSSO SP OLP.249 COR.
  • SÃO PAULO MUNICÍPIO UNIDADE DE SAÚDE ENDEREÇO TELEFONES Adamantina Santa Casa De Misericórdia R

    SÃO PAULO MUNICÍPIO UNIDADE DE SAÚDE ENDEREÇO TELEFONES Adamantina Santa Casa De Misericórdia R

    SÃO PAULO MUNICÍPIO UNIDADE DE SAÚDE ENDEREÇO TELEFONES Adamantina Santa Casa de Misericórdia R. Joaquim Vian, 209 (18) 3502-2200 Aguai Santa Casa de Misericórdia R. Alexandrino de Alencar, 37 (19) 3652-1366 Águas de Lindóia Hospital Geral Dr. Francisco Tozzi Rua Santa Catarina, 158 (19) 3824-1122 Altinópolis C. S. II Rua Campos Sales, 365 (16) 3665-2299 Americana Hospital Municipal Av. da Saúde, 415 (19) 3471-6750 Amparo Santa Casa Anna Cintra Rua Anna Cintra, 332 (19) 3807-4477 Andradina Santa Casa de Andradina Av. Guanabara, 730 (18) 3702-1100 Angatuba Santa Casa de Misericórdia R. José Franco de Araujo, 1020 - Centro (15) 3255-1055 Aparecida Santa Casa de Misericordia R. Barão Rio Branco, 470 - Centro (12) 3104-5555 Apiaí Santa Casa de Apiaí Rua 1º de Maio, 336 (15) 3552-1266 Araçatuba Santa Casa de Araçatuba Rua Floriano Peixoto, 896 - Vila Mendonça (18) 3607-3000 Araraquara Pronto Socorro Melhado Av. Heitor Bin, 90 - Vila Melhado (16) 3311-1010 Araras Santa casa de Misericórdia Praça Dr. Narciso Gomes, 49 (19) 3543-5400 Assis Pronto Socorro Municipal de Assis Rua Smith Vasconcelos, S/N - Centro (18) 3322-3553/3302-6069 Atibaia Hospital/Maternidade São José (Santa Casa) Praça Dr. Miguel Vairo, 104 (11) 4412-3059 Auriflama Santa Casa de Auriflama Rua Alfredo Dainesi, 59-52 (17) 3482-1282 Avaré Santa Casa de Misericórdia R. Paraíba, 1003 - Centro (14) 3711-9100 Bananal Unidade Mista de Saúde Av. Bom Jesus 134 - Centro (12) 3116-1288 Barra do Turvo Pronto Atendimento R. Vereador Firmino Pedroso dos Santos, 375 (15) 3578-9420 Barretos Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Barretos Av.
  • Andradina 166 Araçatuba 138 Araraquara 86 Assis 89 Avaré 125

    Andradina 166 Araçatuba 138 Araraquara 86 Assis 89 Avaré 125

    SECRETARIA DE AGRICULTURA E ABASTECIMENTO DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO COORDENADORIA DE DEFESA AGROPECUÁRIA PLANO DE METAS CDA/2021 Programa > Atividade Regional Meta 2021 > Produto Andradina 166 Araçatuba 138 Araraquara 86 Assis 89 Avaré 125 Barretos 94 Bauru 108 Botucatu 111 Bragança Paulista 156 Campinas 87 Catanduva 116 Dracena 149 Fernandópolis 95 Franca 77 General Salgado 156 Guaratinguetá 146 Itapetininga 212 Itapeva 148 Jaboticabal 107 Jales 184 Jaú 77 Limeira 95 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ www.cda.sp.gov.br 1 PEVSA > Avaliação de Avaliação propriedades Propriedades > PEVSA quanto ao risco sanitário > avaliadas Lins 87 Marília 84 Mogi das Cruzes 74 Mogi Mirim 89 Orlândia 39 Ourinhos 119 PEVSA > Avaliação de Avaliação propriedades Propriedades > PEVSA quanto ao risco sanitário > avaliadas Pindaminhangaba 196 Piracicaba 95 Pres. Prudente 202 Pres. Venceslau 214 Registro 81 Ribeirão Preto 82 S. J. da Boa Vista 142 S. J. do Rio Preto 189 São Paulo 98 Sorocaba 164 Tupã 103 Votuporanga 98 Programa > Atividade Regional Meta 2021 > Produto Andradina Sob demanda Araçatuba Sob demanda Araraquara Sob demanda Assis Sob demanda Avaré Sob demanda Barretos Sob demanda Bauru Sob demanda Botucatu Sob demanda Bragança Paulista Sob demanda Campinas Sob demanda _______________________________________________________________________________________________Catanduva Sob demanda _____________________________________________________________________
  • Implementation of a Clinical Quality Control Program in a Mammography Screening Service of Brazil

    Implementation of a Clinical Quality Control Program in a Mammography Screening Service of Brazil

    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 34: 5057-5066 (2014) Implementation of a Clinical Quality Control Program in a Mammography Screening Service of Brazil SILVIA MARIA PRIOLI DE SOUZA SABINO1, THIAGO BUOSI SILVA1, ANAPAULA HIDEMI UEMA WATANABE1, KARI SYRJÄNEN2,3, ANDRÉ LOPES CARVALHO2 and EDMUNDO CARVALHO MAUAD1 1Department of Cancer Prevention, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil; 2Teaching and Research Institute, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil; 3Department of Oncology & Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland Abstract. Aim: To evaluate the effect of a clinical quality detection remains one of the cornerstones in the fight against control program on the final quality of a mammography breast cancer mortality (3). The quality of mammography is screening service. Materials and Methods: We conducted directly related to the capacity for detecting an abnormality. retrospective assessment of the clinical quality of 5,000 While screening mammography without adequate quality mammograms taken in a Mammography Screening Program control reaches a sensitivity of 66%, an adequately controlled between November 2010 and September 2011, following the screening mammography has sensitivity up to 85-90% (4, 5). implementation of a Clinical Quality Control Program based Optimal quality of the mammography image is essential on the European Guidelines. Results: Among the 105,000 for successful diagnosis of breast cancer (6, 7). This includes evaluated quality items, there were 8,588 failures (8.2%) - 1.7 both the (i) technical criteria associated with the assessment failures per examination. Altogether, 89% of the failures were of the mammography and workstations through well- associated with positioning. The recall rate due to a technical established periodic tests (8), and (ii) clinical criteria error reached a maximum of 0.5% in the early phase of the involving the review of the produced films, mammographic observation period and subsequently stabilized (0.09%).